Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping Pima County Sheriff Nanos gives update on Nancy Guthrie investigation Sheriff admits information being withheld from public, but for good reason They want to ensure they’re doing it right. -Not only to avoid arresting the wrong person, but to ensure they are able to properly prosecute...

24,945 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Nancy Guthrie- 3 Points 1-The time that Annie and Tommaso arrived was at 11:56 a.m. You know how I know? It is so precise. This chart was presented on day 4. It is derived from forensic analysis conducted by investigators over 3 days of "hundreds of officers" working the case. This is exactly the preciseness you would see when the source is digital analysis. This looks just like the chart I would have preliminary prepared based on known data. What Sheriff Nanos said about the time being about 11 a.m. was merely guess-work. He was wrong. The chart is right. Annie and Tommaso looked around and knew quickly that there was a serious issue and called 911 and then called hospitals as they waited on police to arrive. It didn't take any time at all to see there was foul play. I believe the chart. I believe Nanos was guestimating. He even says that. 2-The photo below shows irrefutable evidence of expiration, IMV. (Not aspiration;) See the little droplets in this photo? It gives a better picture of the mist. 3-There is a critical piece of footage from 2/1 where Sheriff Nanos spoke to reporters. Have you seen it? Nanos made multiple key statements about search and rescue efforts to find Nancy, but in the next breath said he had concerns about foul play. Hmmm- *2 doors open *Blood on the porch *Nest camera pulled from the doorway *Nancy was in poor health (his words) There was no way to see this as a search and rescue mission, but he apparently did. Is that why Sheriff Nanos pulled the footage? #NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieKidnapping

Jennifer Coffindaffer

35,424 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

ZELENSKYY ON HIS CONVERSATION WITH ABRAMOVICH: Ceasefire is the biggest compromise from our side to your side. ZELENSKYY: Abramovich, so he came to Kyiv,bI think that he said: "I have message direct to you, and I want to get message, and take message from you, and to give it to Putin." But he said that it has to be silently, without any kind of, public messages. I said, "Look, it's your choice. Okay, for us it doesn't matter, public or un-public." But it's always with Russians such way. If they say something has to be between us, it's mean that tomorrow not only we will know about it. But it's not a secret. He came, and he wanted to give me the message that they want to to understand what we are ready to do. I said: "The question is not about us. You are fighting against us on our territory." And I said to him about Donbas, it was the key message. And I said: "No, we will not leave, and we will not go out from our territory. No, we will not give you a victory such way. And you will not get it." And we spoke about any kind of compromises. I said that all the compromises after ceasefire. Ceasefire is the biggest compromise from our side to your side. JOURNALIST: So is he a go-between now? Between you and Vladimir Putin, he's going back and forth? ZELENSKYY: I don't know. When he got message from me, he said he will go directly to Putin. I said: "Okay, I'm ready to meet, not in Moscow, not in Belarus, and not in Minsk," and it's understandable why. I said, "You can choose any time from tomorrow. You can choose any day, any format. We can choose with President Trump. I'm sure that he will be ready to come, and we can do it with Europeans. I'm sure that everybody want to help, or we can choose the way bilateral, just bilateral meeting."

Kateryna Lisunova

25,494 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Interesting turn of events with Nancy Guthrie case (mother of NBC host kidnapping) The woman the FBI got the Nest camera footage from didn’t have a Premium subscription Yet without a subscription, even being disabled, it was able to record and store footage “We are tracked, they are listening, they are watching, we are being recorded” What’s happening is even if you don’t have a subscription Google is recording and storing the footage from your doorbell camera, but you can only access it without a subscription You think it’s not being recorded and stored, but it is…. Even with the camera disabled, it was recording footage and able to be recovered… “Nancy Guthrie had a Nest camera, which is owned by Google, and law enforcement initially believed the doorbell footage was lost and said Nancy Guthrie did not have a premium subscription to access video from her doorbell camera — Now, according to Google, if a Nest camera is disabled, it can still record up to three hours of event video history without a subscription. So many are wondering, why did it take so long for this video to be released? Well, it takes time for authorities to basically recover this video from Google servers, since Nancy Guthrie did not have a premium subscription that offers special features for video history. And essentially, video is continuously recorded and saved with a subscription, but without a subscription, video is saved until it's overwritten. In this case, they thought because there was no subscription, it would have been erased and recorded over because it would be sort of a continuous situation. And then that's the real issue here. Look, we live in a surveillance economy and as much as we'd like to think that we can delete things and things will go away, and there are some apps that in fact make things go away, the truth of the matter is that we are tracked, They are listening, they are watching, we are being recorded.”

Wall Street Apes

255,091 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Seth Rogen reveals The Interview used a real tiger because the CGI was too expensive, then the tiger wrangler started asking terrifying questions I did a movie called The Interview about North Korea, and there’s a scene with a tiger. I directed the movie with my partner, and we wrote this scene where there’s a tiger. I thought in my head it would be CG. Life of Pi had come out recently, and I was like, “We’ll get the Life of Pi tiger. Put us down for one Life of Pi.” They were like, “We can’t afford that at all. We’ve got to get a real tiger.” I was like, “Oh God.” So we found a tiger wrangler in Calgary, and we had a call with him. It was so funny because he was the least confidence inspiring person you’ve ever spoken to in your entire life. I asked, “Where’d you get the tiger?” He said, “From a stripper.” We were like, “What?” He said, “She had a tiger cub as part of her act, and it got too big, so she had to get rid of it.” We asked, “Where does a stripper get a tiger?” He said, “It’s easier than you think. You could get one.” We had sent him the script, and he said, “Let’s go over the scene. You’re not shooting this at night, are you?” I said, “Yeah, the scene is set at night.” He said, “Ooh.” I asked, “Why is that bad?” He said, “Well, they hunt at night.” He asked, “Can it be during the day?” We said, “No. Is that okay?” There was a long pause, and he said, “Yeah, it’s okay. I think it’s okay.” Then he asked, “It won’t be in a big open area, will it?” We said, “Yeah, it’s basically a giant meadow.” He said, “Ooh.” We asked, “Is that bad?” He said, “Well, if there’s a deer or something, they will go after it.” We said, “That’s bad. Should we not do this?” He said, “No, it’s fine.” Then he asked, “It won’t be raining, will it?” We said, “Yeah. We’re filming in Vancouver in the winter. It will be raining.” He said, “Oh, that’s not good.” We asked, “Why?” He said, “The rain really agitates them. They just don’t like the rain.” We asked, “Should we not do it?” He said, “No, it’s fine. It’ll be fine.”

Ruzy.hl

316,974 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨TRUMP: IF THE RUSSIANS ARE HELPING IRAN, THEY’RE NOT DOING A VERY GOOD JOB. They could give all the information they want, but the people they're sending it to (Iranians) are overwhelmed. Russia would be overwhelmed, too. ENVOY WITKOFF said that he communicated to the Russians not to send targeting information or other assistance to the Iranians. "I strongly said that," he commented. JOURNALIST: Peter asked you a question yesterday. You said it wasn't the right time. But he was asking whether you have indications that Russia is supporting Iran somehow in this. TRUMP: I have no indication of that whatsoever. If they are, they're not doing a very good job because Iran is not doing too well. JOURNALIST: What about the Strait of Hormuz? There's really no traffic going through it right now. TRUMP: That's, you know, the ships' choice. But we have it cleaned out. We've wiped out their navy. Their navy is now at the bottom of the sea. So that's the choice. This is an incursion. We figured oil prices would go up, which they will. They'll also come down. They'll come down very fast. And we will have gotten rid of a major, major cancer on the face of the earth. We will have taken out a cancer. JOURNALIST: Secretary Bessent announced a move to temporarily allow certain Russian oil sales to India. Are you considering any other moves, including the SPR? TRUMP: If there were some, I would do it, just to take a little of the pressure off. The oil pressure. But there's a lot of oil. We've got a lot of oil. Our country has a tremendous amount. There's a lot of oil out there. JOURNALIST: Mr. Witkoff, have you communicated to the Russians not to send targeting information and other assistance to the Iranians? WITKOFF: I strongly said that. JOURNALIST: And do you believe that they are WITKOFF: I hope they're not. JOURNALIST: Do you see any evidence? TRUMP: We don't know, but (Russia) is not doing very well. If they are, it's not helping much. If you take a look at what's happened to Iran in the last week, if they're getting information, it's not helping them much. JOURNALIST: Even if it's not helping the Iranians particularly much, it's still involving themselves in a conflict that they're not... TRUMP: I guess they'd say, we do it against them, wouldn't they? Wouldn't they say that, we do it against them? I don't know. Look, they could give all the information that they want, but the people they're sending it to are overwhelmed. Russia would be overwhelmed, too. Anybody would be overwhelmed. We have the greatest military on earth, and I built it in my first term, and unfortunately, I'm forced to use it now.

Kateryna Lisunova

61,552 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад