Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🤯 Narinda Kaur completely lost the plot on Jeremy Vine today after caller Charlotte from County Durham gave her a few home truths about the small boat crisis. The debate was supposedly about housing more “asylum seekers” in wealthier areas. Charlotte cut straight through the nonsense and called it...

triffic_stuff_'s profile picture

J Stewart

35,119 subscribers

470,418 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Tim Farron, "The amount money the Conservative government have wasted on the Rwanda plan so far is the equivalent of 5.7 million GP appointments" Tim Farron #BBCQT "The Conservative party are pushing the Rwanda plan because they think it will give them a few points in the opinion polls" "75% of asylum seekers, when they are processed turn out to be genuine asylum seekers.. What would you want to happen to you if this country was an unliveable basketcase -audience claps- and that is your answer" "France takes 3x more asylum seekers than we do. Germany takes 4x as many. 17 European countries take more asylum seekers per head than we do" "How do we deter people coming here? Spend the Rwanda money on 6,000 case workers" "What would be a deterrent? 25% are not genuine asylum seekers. If we had a government that was competent enough to deal with the backlog, and then remove the people who are not asylum seekers, that would be a deterrent" "The Rwanda plan is a waste of time. A waste of your money that could be spent on the NHS" "They're playing politics with the lives of the most desperate people on the planet" "What 0.2% of all asylum seekers will go to Rwanda. Is that really a deterrent?" "Either Rwanda is a safe place, in which case it will not be a deterrent. Or it is an unsafe place and no decent government would ever send anyone there"
2:10

Tim Farron, "The amount money the Conservative government have wasted on the Rwanda plan so far is the equivalent of 5.7 million GP appointments" Tim Farron #BBCQT "The Conservative party are pushing the Rwanda plan because they think it will give them a few points in the opinion polls" "75% of asylum seekers, when they are processed turn out to be genuine asylum seekers.. What would you want to happen to you if this country was an unliveable basketcase -audience claps- and that is your answer" "France takes 3x more asylum seekers than we do. Germany takes 4x as many. 17 European countries take more asylum seekers per head than we do" "How do we deter people coming here? Spend the Rwanda money on 6,000 case workers" "What would be a deterrent? 25% are not genuine asylum seekers. If we had a government that was competent enough to deal with the backlog, and then remove the people who are not asylum seekers, that would be a deterrent" "The Rwanda plan is a waste of time. A waste of your money that could be spent on the NHS" "They're playing politics with the lives of the most desperate people on the planet" "What 0.2% of all asylum seekers will go to Rwanda. Is that really a deterrent?" "Either Rwanda is a safe place, in which case it will not be a deterrent. Or it is an unsafe place and no decent government would ever send anyone there"

Farrukh

305,587 views • 2 years ago

The biggest takeaway from the Epstein files is that it is a grotesque example of how power corrupts. The entire establishment system is rotten to the core - on all sides of the political spectrum. They think that they are above the law. A bunch of sick and twisted gilded individuals who are more concerned about their selfish and disgustingly depraved needs and who don’t give a shit about improving society, while pretending that they do. They use fake virtue as a masquerade to cover up a whole multitude of sins. And they get away with it because the entire system is tilted. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else. It’s about time that everyone stops being so subservient to these power mad, greedy, corrupt and deviant psychopaths and work together to genuinely try and change the system and drain the swamp. As George Carlin once said: “It's a big club, and you ain’t in it. You and I are not in the big club. And by the way, it's the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long beating you over the head in their media telling you what to believe, what to think and what to buy. The table is tilted folks. The game is rigged. I'll tell you what they don’t want: They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. That’s against their interests. They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around a kitchen table to figure out how badly they’re getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. They don’t want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers.”
2:20

The biggest takeaway from the Epstein files is that it is a grotesque example of how power corrupts. The entire establishment system is rotten to the core - on all sides of the political spectrum. They think that they are above the law. A bunch of sick and twisted gilded individuals who are more concerned about their selfish and disgustingly depraved needs and who don’t give a shit about improving society, while pretending that they do. They use fake virtue as a masquerade to cover up a whole multitude of sins. And they get away with it because the entire system is tilted. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else. It’s about time that everyone stops being so subservient to these power mad, greedy, corrupt and deviant psychopaths and work together to genuinely try and change the system and drain the swamp. As George Carlin once said: “It's a big club, and you ain’t in it. You and I are not in the big club. And by the way, it's the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long beating you over the head in their media telling you what to believe, what to think and what to buy. The table is tilted folks. The game is rigged. I'll tell you what they don’t want: They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. That’s against their interests. They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around a kitchen table to figure out how badly they’re getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. They don’t want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers.”

James Melville 🚜

78,461 views • 6 months ago

“This is why many of Peter Obi's supporters appear to be Rad!cals and not willing to support any other Presidential Candidate; Majority of Peter Obi supporters are normal Nigerians that are not politicians, and also the ones in Diaapora. They just want to see Nigeria work. And any candidate that the diasporan community supports is a candidate that you can take to the bank cos their views are based off of what they see in the country they live in and how they want to it be replicated back home and who they see as the person that can replicate it back home and what’s why they support him cos none of these other candidates can do that including Tinubu himself” - Man says
3:39

“This is why many of Peter Obi's supporters appear to be Rad!cals and not willing to support any other Presidential Candidate; Majority of Peter Obi supporters are normal Nigerians that are not politicians, and also the ones in Diaapora. They just want to see Nigeria work. And any candidate that the diasporan community supports is a candidate that you can take to the bank cos their views are based off of what they see in the country they live in and how they want to it be replicated back home and who they see as the person that can replicate it back home and what’s why they support him cos none of these other candidates can do that including Tinubu himself” - Man says

Oyindamola🙄

16,157 views • 3 months ago

Zoe Gardener on asylum seekers, "People are being moved out of a hotel where there were violent racist protests taking place week in week outside of their gates" "People being terrorised who were living there, a huge disturbance to the local community" "Yes, its right people should not have been housed in that hotel but for it to happen in this way, what an enormous humiliation for this government" "A huge failure which lays bear the arrogance with which they have approached this asylum issue" "Labour have gone day after day after day this summer pursuing anti migrant rhetoric over their social media, their announcements, across all of their policy approaches" "Labour have fuelled the flames of this hatred" "What they should have been doing is acting sooner to moving people out of hotels and into a more sustainable community accommodation" "What if we allowed people to work while they are in the asylum system, as they do across Europe, so that they can pay to support themselves in private rental accommodation" "It is not illegal to enter the UK to seek asylum" "And in every other European country they are entitled to work while their claims are being assessed" "They are not breaking the law by being here, it is clear under international law they have a right to be here and claim asylum" "Under this privatised system of asylum accommodation where people own, as you say, poor quality hard to let properties. That's not the right model" "We should have a not for profit model of asylum accommodation where people are house through local authorities, where they are able to work in order to support their own accommodation" "It is insulting the intelligence of viewers that they can simply be made to disappear" "We're already seeing the violent far right racist organised parts of those demonstrations, those people are saying this was a success, saying that if they create a space that is unsafe outside these hotels, if they create disorder, they will have to move asylum seekers out" "And they are threatening to do it all over the country"
4:22

Zoe Gardener on asylum seekers, "People are being moved out of a hotel where there were violent racist protests taking place week in week outside of their gates" "People being terrorised who were living there, a huge disturbance to the local community" "Yes, its right people should not have been housed in that hotel but for it to happen in this way, what an enormous humiliation for this government" "A huge failure which lays bear the arrogance with which they have approached this asylum issue" "Labour have gone day after day after day this summer pursuing anti migrant rhetoric over their social media, their announcements, across all of their policy approaches" "Labour have fuelled the flames of this hatred" "What they should have been doing is acting sooner to moving people out of hotels and into a more sustainable community accommodation" "What if we allowed people to work while they are in the asylum system, as they do across Europe, so that they can pay to support themselves in private rental accommodation" "It is not illegal to enter the UK to seek asylum" "And in every other European country they are entitled to work while their claims are being assessed" "They are not breaking the law by being here, it is clear under international law they have a right to be here and claim asylum" "Under this privatised system of asylum accommodation where people own, as you say, poor quality hard to let properties. That's not the right model" "We should have a not for profit model of asylum accommodation where people are house through local authorities, where they are able to work in order to support their own accommodation" "It is insulting the intelligence of viewers that they can simply be made to disappear" "We're already seeing the violent far right racist organised parts of those demonstrations, those people are saying this was a success, saying that if they create a space that is unsafe outside these hotels, if they create disorder, they will have to move asylum seekers out" "And they are threatening to do it all over the country"

Farrukh

163,695 views • 1 year ago

Benny Johnson’s Team EXPOSES All Single Military Aged Syrian Men Coming Across The US Mexico Border 🚨 These men are being imported for a very specific reason, this is the finale for the globalist takedown of America. Buy guns & ammo. “I just watched a video of 50 Syrian men crossing our border in Arizona. I just have a few questions. Where are the women and children? How did they get from Syria to Mexico? Who paid for them to get to Mexico? If you believe these are asylum seekers, do you believe that there were no children and women who also needed asylum? No, just military-aged men and why are we allowing 95% of them to come into our country? And why is our government not asking any of these questions? Why is this not being blasted all over the news? Who are these military-aged women and childless men that are coming into our country? Make it make sense. She makes it really good.”
0:46

Benny Johnson’s Team EXPOSES All Single Military Aged Syrian Men Coming Across The US Mexico Border 🚨 These men are being imported for a very specific reason, this is the finale for the globalist takedown of America. Buy guns & ammo. “I just watched a video of 50 Syrian men crossing our border in Arizona. I just have a few questions. Where are the women and children? How did they get from Syria to Mexico? Who paid for them to get to Mexico? If you believe these are asylum seekers, do you believe that there were no children and women who also needed asylum? No, just military-aged men and why are we allowing 95% of them to come into our country? And why is our government not asking any of these questions? Why is this not being blasted all over the news? Who are these military-aged women and childless men that are coming into our country? Make it make sense. She makes it really good.”

Wall Street Apes

741,464 views • 2 years ago

Tucker Carlson Goes Biblical on the Global Agenda “What they’re promising you is DEATH.” “If they’re promising you the opportunity to castrate your children, what are they really promising you? No grandchildren. The end of your line. And Solomon and David would instantly recognize that as an act of total war against you and your people — period. Because that’s what that is. “So they can’t say any of this out loud because there’s not one person who wants that product — extinction. There’s not one person who wants that. And so, if they’re going to take and maintain power, they need to get it another way, a non-democratic way. And the way they’re going to do that, and the way they are doing it as we speak, is by changing the population of the country.” Tucker Carlson
1:30

Tucker Carlson Goes Biblical on the Global Agenda “What they’re promising you is DEATH.” “If they’re promising you the opportunity to castrate your children, what are they really promising you? No grandchildren. The end of your line. And Solomon and David would instantly recognize that as an act of total war against you and your people — period. Because that’s what that is. “So they can’t say any of this out loud because there’s not one person who wants that product — extinction. There’s not one person who wants that. And so, if they’re going to take and maintain power, they need to get it another way, a non-democratic way. And the way they’re going to do that, and the way they are doing it as we speak, is by changing the population of the country.” Tucker Carlson

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,043,637 views • 2 years ago

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”
2:36

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”

Curtis Houck

108,556 views • 4 months ago

Goldman: “If your department then deports anyone with an ongoing asylum application, you are violating the law, correct?” Noem: “Joe Biden left us…” Goldman: “I’m not asking about Joe Biden…If your department deports anyone with an ongoing asylum application. You are violating the law. Is that correct?” Noem: “It was greatly violated when they allowed 1.5 million people to come in.” Goldman: “Why are you filibustering? Why can't you answer the question?” Noem: “Your president and your secretary did not follow the law.” Goldman: “If your department deports anyone with an ongoing asylum application. You are violating the law. Isn't that correct?” Noem: “The asylum system was broken under the last administration.” Goldman: “I will reclaim my time. She's not answering the question. But the obvious answer is that yes. If you follow a lawful pathway, asylum is a lawful pathway. If you have an open asylum case, you are here lawfully, but the problem that we are seeing around the country is that you are not following the law.”
2:03

Goldman: “If your department then deports anyone with an ongoing asylum application, you are violating the law, correct?” Noem: “Joe Biden left us…” Goldman: “I’m not asking about Joe Biden…If your department deports anyone with an ongoing asylum application. You are violating the law. Is that correct?” Noem: “It was greatly violated when they allowed 1.5 million people to come in.” Goldman: “Why are you filibustering? Why can't you answer the question?” Noem: “Your president and your secretary did not follow the law.” Goldman: “If your department deports anyone with an ongoing asylum application. You are violating the law. Isn't that correct?” Noem: “The asylum system was broken under the last administration.” Goldman: “I will reclaim my time. She's not answering the question. But the obvious answer is that yes. If you follow a lawful pathway, asylum is a lawful pathway. If you have an open asylum case, you are here lawfully, but the problem that we are seeing around the country is that you are not following the law.”

The Bulwark

550,003 views • 8 months ago

🚨Warning- F bombs incoming🚨 Could not have said it any better than this fired up woman. “You love Kings! ….The people who are saying they don’t want Government to control them are the same people who want the Government to control them. Yes, you want the Government to do everything for you. You want them to give you free healthcare, free housing, free food, free student loans, the list is endless. All you guys wanna’ do is be dependent on the Government. You love when Government tells what to do like stay home and stay six feet apart and you love when they subsidize your life… YOU ARE THE TYRANNY, yes! YOU are the tyrannical, radical oppressors. You are the people who hate everybody else who doesn’t conform to your ideology. You are the ones who want to have a license to respond to those who do not think the way that you do with nothing but hatred and violence. YOU are the F*****g Kings!” Is she wrong? She is so spot on it’s not funny. And don’t forget, they appointed a presidential candidate without a vote! I’m so with you my friend. You are 100% correct. Hilarious that they are protesting the very thing their party is.
1:40

🚨Warning- F bombs incoming🚨 Could not have said it any better than this fired up woman. “You love Kings! ….The people who are saying they don’t want Government to control them are the same people who want the Government to control them. Yes, you want the Government to do everything for you. You want them to give you free healthcare, free housing, free food, free student loans, the list is endless. All you guys wanna’ do is be dependent on the Government. You love when Government tells what to do like stay home and stay six feet apart and you love when they subsidize your life… YOU ARE THE TYRANNY, yes! YOU are the tyrannical, radical oppressors. You are the people who hate everybody else who doesn’t conform to your ideology. You are the ones who want to have a license to respond to those who do not think the way that you do with nothing but hatred and violence. YOU are the F*****g Kings!” Is she wrong? She is so spot on it’s not funny. And don’t forget, they appointed a presidential candidate without a vote! I’m so with you my friend. You are 100% correct. Hilarious that they are protesting the very thing their party is.

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

118,036 views • 10 months ago

President Trump just gave an answer that will go down in the history books when Peter Doocy asked why assassination attempts keep happening to him. “We’ve changed this country and there are lot of people that are not happy about that.” TRUMP: “Well, you know, I’ve studied assassinations and I must tell you, the most impactful people...” “The people that do the most...you take a look at the people, Abraham Lincoln...the people that have gone through this...the people to do the most...the people that make the biggest impact, they’re the ones that they go after.” “They don’t go after the ones that don’t do much because they like it that way.” “And when you look at the people that have either...whether it was an attempt or a successful attempt, and they’re very impactful people just take a look at the names there.” “And I hate to say I’m honored by that but I’ve done a lot.” “We’ve taken this country and we were a laughingstock years and now we’re the hottest country anywhere in the world.” “We’ve changed this country and there are lot of people that are not happy about that.”
1:22

President Trump just gave an answer that will go down in the history books when Peter Doocy asked why assassination attempts keep happening to him. “We’ve changed this country and there are lot of people that are not happy about that.” TRUMP: “Well, you know, I’ve studied assassinations and I must tell you, the most impactful people...” “The people that do the most...you take a look at the people, Abraham Lincoln...the people that have gone through this...the people to do the most...the people that make the biggest impact, they’re the ones that they go after.” “They don’t go after the ones that don’t do much because they like it that way.” “And when you look at the people that have either...whether it was an attempt or a successful attempt, and they’re very impactful people just take a look at the names there.” “And I hate to say I’m honored by that but I’ve done a lot.” “We’ve taken this country and we were a laughingstock years and now we’re the hottest country anywhere in the world.” “We’ve changed this country and there are lot of people that are not happy about that.”

Overton

57,936 views • 3 months ago

100% correct... Common sense that liberals don’t want to hear!! Finally, someone said it besides me been saying that all along you knew this was a possibility you should’ve budgeted. Nobody put you in this position but yourself feed your goddamn kids, not us.!! Mother's today are to greedy lazy and only having kids that they dont want just to live off the state because they have delusions that the word owes them
1:28

100% correct... Common sense that liberals don’t want to hear!! Finally, someone said it besides me been saying that all along you knew this was a possibility you should’ve budgeted. Nobody put you in this position but yourself feed your goddamn kids, not us.!! Mother's today are to greedy lazy and only having kids that they dont want just to live off the state because they have delusions that the word owes them

GABRIEL 🪽

70,447 views • 9 months ago

Man being chased out the park after being accused of taking photos. This is going to be a common occurrence now and people will be falsely targeted along the way. Myself and those of you with any common sense could see this all coming a mile off. But when we spoke about it we were called racist. These people coming in now are different from the Windrush generation and they are dragging their reputation through the mud but many people on the left are too short sighted to see that.
0:56

Man being chased out the park after being accused of taking photos. This is going to be a common occurrence now and people will be falsely targeted along the way. Myself and those of you with any common sense could see this all coming a mile off. But when we spoke about it we were called racist. These people coming in now are different from the Windrush generation and they are dragging their reputation through the mud but many people on the left are too short sighted to see that.

Around Liverpool

18,450 views • 2 months ago

Bryan Johnson reveals why modern people are NOT in control of their own lives “People are not the architects of their lives because they compulsively scroll, eat fast food, and do all these bad behaviors. When pressed on it, they rationalize it as virtue because they're trapped” “I would challenge everyone here to reclaim yourself and don’t do anything you don’t want to do. The enemy is whoever is trying to get you to do something that is not in your best interest. That gives you the moral power. Don’t be puppeted”
1:06

Bryan Johnson reveals why modern people are NOT in control of their own lives “People are not the architects of their lives because they compulsively scroll, eat fast food, and do all these bad behaviors. When pressed on it, they rationalize it as virtue because they're trapped” “I would challenge everyone here to reclaim yourself and don’t do anything you don’t want to do. The enemy is whoever is trying to get you to do something that is not in your best interest. That gives you the moral power. Don’t be puppeted”

Mikli

110,369 views • 5 months ago

Yes, indeed, this is lawlessness by any standard. Even by banana republic standards, this is still lawlessness. Your country has a constitution, it has a government, it has a police service, and it has a ruling party. I am sure you can see that some of the people there are actually wearing ruling party T-shirts. It is lawless regardless of whoever does it. It is an embarrassment to South Africa as a country, what you are doing and what you are encouraging people to do. Your country has an immigration service. If people are in your country illegally, they should be arrested and deported through lawful processes. You do not go around destroying property, tearing down markets, and attacking people. It is illegal regardless of whoever does it. It is not illegal because I have said so. It is illegal because the laws of your country make it so. This is vigilantism, pure and simple, and it is tainting the reputation of South Africa, not only across Africa but across the world. If you have got satellite television in your home, you can see that these actions are being reported everywhere. It is not good for your country. This kind of barbarism undermines the rule of law, fuels division, and damages South Africa’s standing as a constitutional democracy. It is the actions of a few that are tainting the reputation of many. The average South African is not mindless like this. They respect the law, and they respect the fact that among them, in their communities, there are people from other countries. If those people are in the country illegally, you report them and the law takes its course through proper processes of arrest and deportation. You do not descend into mob justice, lawlessness, and destruction. That is not who South Africans are, and it must not be normalised.
2:51

Yes, indeed, this is lawlessness by any standard. Even by banana republic standards, this is still lawlessness. Your country has a constitution, it has a government, it has a police service, and it has a ruling party. I am sure you can see that some of the people there are actually wearing ruling party T-shirts. It is lawless regardless of whoever does it. It is an embarrassment to South Africa as a country, what you are doing and what you are encouraging people to do. Your country has an immigration service. If people are in your country illegally, they should be arrested and deported through lawful processes. You do not go around destroying property, tearing down markets, and attacking people. It is illegal regardless of whoever does it. It is not illegal because I have said so. It is illegal because the laws of your country make it so. This is vigilantism, pure and simple, and it is tainting the reputation of South Africa, not only across Africa but across the world. If you have got satellite television in your home, you can see that these actions are being reported everywhere. It is not good for your country. This kind of barbarism undermines the rule of law, fuels division, and damages South Africa’s standing as a constitutional democracy. It is the actions of a few that are tainting the reputation of many. The average South African is not mindless like this. They respect the law, and they respect the fact that among them, in their communities, there are people from other countries. If those people are in the country illegally, you report them and the law takes its course through proper processes of arrest and deportation. You do not descend into mob justice, lawlessness, and destruction. That is not who South Africans are, and it must not be normalised.

Hopewell Chin’ono

80,812 views • 3 months ago

JB Pritzker: ”These agents are not being deployed to promote safety. They don’t belong on the streets when they’re not willing to abide by the law. Homeland Security immediately launched a campaign of lies and propaganda to justify their actions. Kristi Noem and Donald Trump have told Americans to disbelieve clear indisputable video evidence. They want you to question what your eyes and ears are telling you. It is unimaginable to think this can happen in our country or that when it does happen the government immediately tries to cover it up. It should anger you. It’s time for Kristi Noem to go.”
2:31

JB Pritzker: ”These agents are not being deployed to promote safety. They don’t belong on the streets when they’re not willing to abide by the law. Homeland Security immediately launched a campaign of lies and propaganda to justify their actions. Kristi Noem and Donald Trump have told Americans to disbelieve clear indisputable video evidence. They want you to question what your eyes and ears are telling you. It is unimaginable to think this can happen in our country or that when it does happen the government immediately tries to cover it up. It should anger you. It’s time for Kristi Noem to go.”

Marco Foster

343,917 views • 7 months ago

Zoe Gardener, "Ukrainians have a safe route to get here.. Nobody from Ukraine got on a small boat and had to be put up in hotels.. We provided them with housing, let them get jobs, have access to welfare" Time Radio, "Regards to protests in Epping, do these people not have legitimate concerns?" Zoe Gardener, "The asylum seekers have no say over where they are housed" "There was a vicar arrested for sexual assaults and abuses yesterday, we haven't seen any protests outside churches" "Why? Because we recognise that one individual white christian is not a representative of an entire parish of white christian people" "So we don't go outside a church full of worshipers and shout racist abuse when a white vicar is arrested on sexual offence charges" "To go to a place where an asylum seeker is accommodated through no fault of their own because another asylum seeker is suspected of having committed an offence is racist" "If you have a problem with the way the government is managing the dispersal of asylum seekers then your target of protest is the government" "It is not innocent people who happen to be asylums seekers, who happen to share the ethnicity of somebody you think may have done something wrong"
3:54

Zoe Gardener, "Ukrainians have a safe route to get here.. Nobody from Ukraine got on a small boat and had to be put up in hotels.. We provided them with housing, let them get jobs, have access to welfare" Time Radio, "Regards to protests in Epping, do these people not have legitimate concerns?" Zoe Gardener, "The asylum seekers have no say over where they are housed" "There was a vicar arrested for sexual assaults and abuses yesterday, we haven't seen any protests outside churches" "Why? Because we recognise that one individual white christian is not a representative of an entire parish of white christian people" "So we don't go outside a church full of worshipers and shout racist abuse when a white vicar is arrested on sexual offence charges" "To go to a place where an asylum seeker is accommodated through no fault of their own because another asylum seeker is suspected of having committed an offence is racist" "If you have a problem with the way the government is managing the dispersal of asylum seekers then your target of protest is the government" "It is not innocent people who happen to be asylums seekers, who happen to share the ethnicity of somebody you think may have done something wrong"

Farrukh

66,200 views • 1 year ago

🚨An ICE agent illegally pulled over a car in Farmingdale, Maine… without probable cause… and tried to tell people, legally in the U.S., that they don’t have the right to stay. The agent says, on video, “Just because you came to this country and applied for asylum… doesn’t mean you get to stay here.” Except… it literally does. That’s not an opinion. That’s the law. If you apply for asylum, you have a legal right to remain in the United States while your case is processed. Period. So what just happened here? An armed federal agent pulled over a vehicle, without probable cause, misstated the law, and tried to intimidate people out of rights they legally have. That’s a constitutional violation. The Fourth Amendment requires probable cause to stop and detain someone. You don’t get to pull people over just because you feel like it or because of who they are. And Maine law enforcement has already made this clear in other cases… if there’s no probable cause, you don’t get to hold someone. That’s a basic constitutional protection. Then there’s due process… Asylum seekers are in a legal process. They are not “illegal” for being here. The government itself allowed them in while their cases are pending. So, when an ICE agent tells them they don’t have the right to stay… That’s not just wrong, that’s the government lying about your rights to your face. And when the people in the car pushed back… when they actually knew the law… The agent left. Because he never had the legal authority to begin with. This is the pattern we keep seeing… People with legal status being stopped, questioned, detained, or targeted anyway. Even recent reporting out of Maine shows asylum seekers, with no criminal records, being stopped during enforcement operations, and taken. They test the line… cross it… and hope nobody notices. That’s how intimidation works. And no one is holding them accountable.
0:25

🚨An ICE agent illegally pulled over a car in Farmingdale, Maine… without probable cause… and tried to tell people, legally in the U.S., that they don’t have the right to stay. The agent says, on video, “Just because you came to this country and applied for asylum… doesn’t mean you get to stay here.” Except… it literally does. That’s not an opinion. That’s the law. If you apply for asylum, you have a legal right to remain in the United States while your case is processed. Period. So what just happened here? An armed federal agent pulled over a vehicle, without probable cause, misstated the law, and tried to intimidate people out of rights they legally have. That’s a constitutional violation. The Fourth Amendment requires probable cause to stop and detain someone. You don’t get to pull people over just because you feel like it or because of who they are. And Maine law enforcement has already made this clear in other cases… if there’s no probable cause, you don’t get to hold someone. That’s a basic constitutional protection. Then there’s due process… Asylum seekers are in a legal process. They are not “illegal” for being here. The government itself allowed them in while their cases are pending. So, when an ICE agent tells them they don’t have the right to stay… That’s not just wrong, that’s the government lying about your rights to your face. And when the people in the car pushed back… when they actually knew the law… The agent left. Because he never had the legal authority to begin with. This is the pattern we keep seeing… People with legal status being stopped, questioned, detained, or targeted anyway. Even recent reporting out of Maine shows asylum seekers, with no criminal records, being stopped during enforcement operations, and taken. They test the line… cross it… and hope nobody notices. That’s how intimidation works. And no one is holding them accountable.

Jesus Freakin Congress

56,369 views • 3 months ago

WOW 🚨 Dominik Tarczyński reveals there is a “First safe country” policy that’s countries were supposed to be abiding by, even the United States, and only Poland was It means if there is a refugee, they MUST go to the “First safe country” typically one that shares a border. If they don’t, they can even be returned to the “first safe country” per this policy Many countries apply “first safe country” (or “first country of asylum”) and “safe third country” concepts in their asylum policies First country of asylum: Asylum seekers can be returned to a prior country where they already received (or had the opportunity for) protection. Safe third country: Claims can be deemed inadmissible if the person passed through a “safe” country where they could have claimed protection. The concepts date back to the 1990s/2000s US-Canada have had these Safe Third Country Agreements in effect since 2004 We should not have taken any of these fake asylum seekers
2:30

WOW 🚨 Dominik Tarczyński reveals there is a “First safe country” policy that’s countries were supposed to be abiding by, even the United States, and only Poland was It means if there is a refugee, they MUST go to the “First safe country” typically one that shares a border. If they don’t, they can even be returned to the “first safe country” per this policy Many countries apply “first safe country” (or “first country of asylum”) and “safe third country” concepts in their asylum policies First country of asylum: Asylum seekers can be returned to a prior country where they already received (or had the opportunity for) protection. Safe third country: Claims can be deemed inadmissible if the person passed through a “safe” country where they could have claimed protection. The concepts date back to the 1990s/2000s US-Canada have had these Safe Third Country Agreements in effect since 2004 We should not have taken any of these fake asylum seekers

Wall Street Apes

47,537 views • 1 month ago

WOW 🚨 England Home Office decision will house illegal migrants on military bases These migrants won’t be required to stay in the barracks, meaning they’ll be infrastructure concerns since these male illegals will be on military bases Liberals are bringing down Europe “Now this news of this legal challenge that could bring more upheaval to that asylum policy. This is important for the government because the government wants to move forward with a system where they can take asylum seekers out of the hotels — and they want to move towards the use of military barracks, either presently used or former military barracks and other suitable sites. That they can put these migrant camps within, but the residents here in this East Sussex town are fighting back because they say that it's completely unsuitable to put, as the government is planning, more than 500 young male asylum seekers in an area where there is just not the infrastructure and real concerns among local people that you have young men who won't be confined to these barracks. It's not a secure accommodation centre. They will be allowed to wander free in the local towns and villages in that area. That's what is so concerning to people in the Croydon area.”
1:16

WOW 🚨 England Home Office decision will house illegal migrants on military bases These migrants won’t be required to stay in the barracks, meaning they’ll be infrastructure concerns since these male illegals will be on military bases Liberals are bringing down Europe “Now this news of this legal challenge that could bring more upheaval to that asylum policy. This is important for the government because the government wants to move forward with a system where they can take asylum seekers out of the hotels — and they want to move towards the use of military barracks, either presently used or former military barracks and other suitable sites. That they can put these migrant camps within, but the residents here in this East Sussex town are fighting back because they say that it's completely unsuitable to put, as the government is planning, more than 500 young male asylum seekers in an area where there is just not the infrastructure and real concerns among local people that you have young men who won't be confined to these barracks. It's not a secure accommodation centre. They will be allowed to wander free in the local towns and villages in that area. That's what is so concerning to people in the Croydon area.”

Wall Street Apes

45,741 views • 8 months ago