正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

NASA's lead electrostatics scientist says he has 2,000 experiments showing a force that shouldn't exist. Dr. Charles Buhler has spent over a decade testing what appears to be propellantless thrust. This is a real, repeatable, directional force with no fuel, no exhaust, just electricity. Teams in Germany and Japan... show more

American Alchemy

46,988 subscribers

90,386 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

A NASA scientist built a device that produces thrust with no fuel, no propellant, and no exhaust! The force appears to come from nowhere. It runs on electric fields alone. Thousands of tests have been completed. Tests done in vacuum chambers with Ion wind being ruled out. A theoretical physicist who sat down with Dr. Buhler says he can’t debunk it. The data says the thrust is real even though our current model of physics says it shouldn’t be. And no one has explained where the force is coming from. This episode is WILD!

A NASA scientist built a device that produces thrust with no fuel, no propellant, and no exhaust! The force appears to come from nowhere. It runs on electric fields alone. Thousands of tests have been completed. Tests done in vacuum chambers with Ion wind being ruled out. A theoretical physicist who sat down with Dr. Buhler says he can’t debunk it. The data says the thrust is real even though our current model of physics says it shouldn’t be. And no one has explained where the force is coming from. This episode is WILD!

American Alchemy

19,075 次观看 • 5 个月前

Wow. NASA’s Lead Electrostatics Scientist just built anti-gravity propulsion. “We won’t need rockets.” “It could lead to deep space exploration.” This is about to change everything. Here’s why: 100 years ago, Thomas Townsend Brown declared that he discovered a type of anti-gravity in experiments. He coined the term “electrogravitics” to describe his discovery. In the 1950s, the military and aerospace industry showed great interest in anti-gravity, or electrogravitics, research. Then, all of a sudden, the trail went cold. UFO researchers have speculated for decades that this research was pulled into classified black projects. Now, Dr. Charles Buhler, NASA’s Lead Electrostatics Scientist and Co-Founder of Exodus Propulsion Technologies, has revived anti-gravity propulsion research. Exodus has run over 2,000 vacuum chamber experiments revealing a propellantless thrust force that cannot be dismissed by conventional explanations. Dr. Buhler just sat down with Jesse Michels to break down his revolutionary work: Michels: “You have achieved how much force roughly with your current experiments?” Dr. Charles Buhler: “Somewhere in the 5-10 millinewton range.” Michels: “If you were to apply that … in a microgravity or zero gravity environment, that would be huge.” “Could the 10 millinewtons of thrust turn into newtons of thrust?” “Could we end up launching things into space with this Exodus method?” Dr. Buhler: “That’s our main goal.” “We call it the self-launchers.” Michels: “Over the 2,000 iterations, have you gone up in newtons of thrust?” Dr. Buhler: “Sure.” Michels: “So you have a sense of the levers to get more thrust?” Dr. Buhler: “There are several, and we are trying to optimize those.” “There’s voltage, materials, properties, breakdown strength of materials, the type of signals we send, the physical limits on the materials.” Michels: “In doing these experiments, did you have access to a vacuum chamber?” “Because that’s been a lot of the reason everybody always questions me on this.” “They’re like, this experiment sounds very simple … why has nobody done it yet?” “Number one, I say people always try to explain it away via the ion wind.” “It’s always easy to say there’s ambient ionization in the vacuum.” “Number two, access to an industrial grade vacuum chamber is pretty limited and it's obviously very expensive.” “So did you have access?” Dr. Buhler: “Yes.” “[Andrew Aurigema] and I have access to a chamber, he’s got one at his house.” “He also has a second one that he’s gonna get online soon, which is almost a walk-in size vacuum chamber.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Wow. NASA’s Lead Electrostatics Scientist just built anti-gravity propulsion. “We won’t need rockets.” “It could lead to deep space exploration.” This is about to change everything. Here’s why: 100 years ago, Thomas Townsend Brown declared that he discovered a type of anti-gravity in experiments. He coined the term “electrogravitics” to describe his discovery. In the 1950s, the military and aerospace industry showed great interest in anti-gravity, or electrogravitics, research. Then, all of a sudden, the trail went cold. UFO researchers have speculated for decades that this research was pulled into classified black projects. Now, Dr. Charles Buhler, NASA’s Lead Electrostatics Scientist and Co-Founder of Exodus Propulsion Technologies, has revived anti-gravity propulsion research. Exodus has run over 2,000 vacuum chamber experiments revealing a propellantless thrust force that cannot be dismissed by conventional explanations. Dr. Buhler just sat down with Jesse Michels to break down his revolutionary work: Michels: “You have achieved how much force roughly with your current experiments?” Dr. Charles Buhler: “Somewhere in the 5-10 millinewton range.” Michels: “If you were to apply that … in a microgravity or zero gravity environment, that would be huge.” “Could the 10 millinewtons of thrust turn into newtons of thrust?” “Could we end up launching things into space with this Exodus method?” Dr. Buhler: “That’s our main goal.” “We call it the self-launchers.” Michels: “Over the 2,000 iterations, have you gone up in newtons of thrust?” Dr. Buhler: “Sure.” Michels: “So you have a sense of the levers to get more thrust?” Dr. Buhler: “There are several, and we are trying to optimize those.” “There’s voltage, materials, properties, breakdown strength of materials, the type of signals we send, the physical limits on the materials.” Michels: “In doing these experiments, did you have access to a vacuum chamber?” “Because that’s been a lot of the reason everybody always questions me on this.” “They’re like, this experiment sounds very simple … why has nobody done it yet?” “Number one, I say people always try to explain it away via the ion wind.” “It’s always easy to say there’s ambient ionization in the vacuum.” “Number two, access to an industrial grade vacuum chamber is pretty limited and it's obviously very expensive.” “So did you have access?” Dr. Buhler: “Yes.” “[Andrew Aurigema] and I have access to a chamber, he’s got one at his house.” “He also has a second one that he’s gonna get online soon, which is almost a walk-in size vacuum chamber.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Holden Culotta

24,917 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨BREAKING: NASA's Lead Electrostatics Scientist claims he’s discovered a “new force” that counteracts gravity with no fuel necessary. Dr. Charles Buhler has run 2,000 vacuum chamber experiments showing a propellantless thrust force that persists after the power is switched off, and cannot be explained by ion wind, magnetic effects, or classical energy conservation. The input is pure electricity and the output is millinewtons of thrust counteracting gravity. He believes his work vindicates the legacy of midcentury antigravity pioneer Thomas Townsend Brown and will lead to a new paradigm of propellantless deep space travel that transcends chemical combustion rockets🚨 Charles Buhler has a PhD in condensed matter physics from Florida State University, spent over two decades at NASA's Electrostatics and Surface Physics Laboratory at Kennedy Space Center (which he now leads), and is the incoming president of the Electrostatic Society of America. He is NASA’s authority on electrostatics. His colleague Andrew Aurigema, a 35-year veteran engineer working from the Townsend Brown electrogravitics lineage, developed a parallel version of the same experiment independently, and the two discovered each other through a mutual colleague who had been watching both of them work in silence for years. Together, under their company Exodus Propulsion Technologies, they have tested nearly 2,000 variations of what they believe is a previously undocumented force. He’s also developed a quantum electrodynamics based theory to explain his results. Buhler’s patent is now under formal examination by the U.S. Patent Office with affidavit-signing witnesses being contacted independently. This is the future of space travel, beyond chemical combustion. With Rocketry, we can only get to Proxima Centauri B in 80,000 years. And you’d burn through the fuel well before that. It’s completely untenable for interstellar travel. 1. Buhler’s Skeptic Mentor Stopped Cold in 2010 The first demonstration happened in a non-vacuum lab using a laser aimed at a wall to detect small displacements. Buhler had his future brother-in-law run the test. His mentor, Dr. Sid Clements, an electrostatics expert who had dismissed the work entirely, watched the laser move and immediately abandoned what he was doing. He walked over, ran through a series of verification steps on the spot, and never questioned the reality of the effect again. That was 2010. It took two more years working with Drew before Buhler realized the force appeared even without any B field or current present. He wasn't in the field momentum regime at all. He was in pure electrostatics. 2. The Force is Not Explainable by Newton’s Laws or Ion Wind Ion wind produces thrust in the same direction the ionized air is traveling. The “Exodus force” (Buhler’s name for his new force) produces thrust perpendicular to the expected ion wind direction, reverses cleanly when the device is flipped, and remains present inside a sealed enclosure where no ionized air can escape. Buhler documented this publicly with video: a balsa lifter placed inside a sealed plastic box on a scale, powered up, lifts internally while the scale reads flat. That is conservation of momentum. That is what ion wind looks like. The Exodus force is something different, and Buhler, as the person who leads NASA's only electrostatics lab, is in an unambiguous position to make that distinction. 3. 2,000 Variations, All Producing the Same Result Since beginning collaboration with Drew, Buhler has tracked nearly 2,000 distinct test articles, each tested multiple times. Pendulums. Spinners. Rotators. Force plates. Scales. Pendulum deflections inside Faraday cages. Reversed polarity tests. Vacuum chamber runs at multiple pressure levels. DC-only configurations that eliminate magnetic field artifacts entirely. Every geometry, every material, every packaging approach. The force appears consistently. When a confounding variable is proposed, they address it, run the modified test, and the force is still there. Buhler says if an exotic explanation remains, it is not one he or any colleague has been able to name. 4. The Device Generates Thrust With the Power Off This is the finding that breaks the classical framework entirely. After charging the device and disconnecting it from the power supply, the thrust continues. The capacitor does not drain in the way a simple energy storage calculation would predict. Put on a scale, the weight reduction persists. Buhler's description: if placed in space with the power off, the device would accelerate. He cannot explain that to the scientific community and says so directly. David Chester, who has independently interacted with Drew through APEC sessions and private communications, said he cannot think of a prosaic explanation for this. The phenomenon has been reproduced enough times across enough configurations that calling it experimental error is no longer a defensible position. 5. The Implications of This for Past Antigravity Work Buhler believes his work is derivative of and related to Townsend Brown’s midcentury asymmetric capacitor experiments also showing thrust with pure electricity as the input. Chemical combustion is limited - plain and simple - we can’t get to the nearest habitable planet (Proxima Centauri B) in close the amount of time we’d need; it would take us 80,000 years and we’d burn through the fuel before we got there. It’s a checkmate in one argument against anyone claiming rockets are the frontier of efficiency. This was the dream of Thomas Townsend Brown – one that got stifled and suppressed behind the veil of secrecy and subcompartments. The common trope from experiments around the world are high electric field differentials seem to result in thrust. Buhler’s experiment exists in this lineage. 6. The Patent Office is Running the Peer Review Buhler made a deliberate choice not to pursue academic peer review as a primary path. His second patent is currently under examination, and the examiner's office has been reaching out to independent witnesses who have signed affidavits confirming they have seen and reproduced the effect. Buhler describes this as equivalent to scientific peer review, run by people with no financial interest in the outcome. His first patent may have been held under a national security review process before release. He does not confirm this, but he was aware it was a risk when he filed. 7. A QED Theorist Could Poke Holes in the Theory, But Not the Experiment We brought in UCLA PhD David Chester to evaluate Buhler’s ideas on quantum electrodynamics (which might account for the thrust being seen). David Chester's contribution was not to validate the theory Buhler proposed. He found some issues with the specific scalar virtual photon framing Buhler had developed. What Chester could not do was provide a prosaic explanation for the experimental results themselves. He said directly that, of all the anomalous phenomena he has surveyed, Buhler and Drew's work ranks in the top ten for experimental persuasiveness, specifically because of the iteration rate and the self-consistency across configurations. He noted that Drew's innovation rate alone, constantly testing new geometries and material stacks, is unlike anything he has seen from other groups making similar claims. Buhler pointed out that his theories were based on time-independent perturbation theory which Chester admits requires further examination from him. 8. NASA's UAP Investigation Had No Physicists Buhler and his wife, an engineer in NASA's Launch Services Program, were approached to assist with NASA's second UAP follow-on investigation. When Buhler asked to be placed with the physicists on the project, he was told there were none. The group was instrumentation-focused. Buhler says he was genuinely shocked. His reaction, expressed directly: if you are facing objects that defy the laws of physics, why is there not a single physicist in the room. He described the same reaction Eric Davis has expressed publicly. This is either institutional brain death or something else is happening somewhere else. 9. Six Lights Emerged from the Ocean Near Patrick Air Force Base Around 2013, Buhler and his wife were alone on the beach near Cocoa Beach, Florida, three miles south of Patrick Air Force Base. A red light appeared roughly three miles offshore, grew extremely bright, then appeared to explode, lighting the full length of beach. A helicopter launched from Patrick Air Force Base, flew to the location, hovered briefly, and returned to base without intervening. The light did not stop. It began moving toward them. At some point it split from one light into six rotating orange-pink lights that went under the water and re-emerged in a repeating cycle. The lights tracked their movement along the beach for forty minutes, closing to within roughly fifty yards before disappearing. Buhler says similar lights have been reported by others in the same area, and Stephen Greer runs group observation sessions approximately forty minutes south of the same beach. 10. The Force Crosses the Unity Threshold for Space Already The current demonstrated force is in the five to ten millinewton range. For Earth launch, that is not yet sufficient, and Buhler does not claim otherwise. For orbital station-keeping, for preventing satellite orbital decay, for repositioning between orbits in microgravity, the force exceeds what is needed. Buhler calls this hitting unity for space, moon, and Mars applications without any major development beyond what has already been demonstrated. The self-launcher, a device capable of lifting itself from Earth's surface, is the declared goal. No blueprints exist yet for the energy requirements. But the force is real, it is directional, it reverses on command, and it does not require continuous power to sustain. Why This Matters NASA's lead electrostatics scientist ran nearly 2,000 controlled experiments, eliminated every prosaic explanation the field has available, documented a thrust that persists after the power is cut, watched the fine structure constant emerge from the data repeatedly, and submitted a second patent currently under formal examination. A QED theorist with no commercial stake in the outcome reviewed the experimental claims and could not find a conventional explanation. The standard debunking line for this entire lineage of experiments has always been ion wind. That argument has been answered, documented, and filmed. What remains is a force that requires either new physics or an error that two decades of systematic testing has not been able to locate. The patent process will resolve part of this. The vacuum chamber footage will resolve more of it. Full conversation is live now. The next stage in human space travel is here.

🚨BREAKING: NASA's Lead Electrostatics Scientist claims he’s discovered a “new force” that counteracts gravity with no fuel necessary. Dr. Charles Buhler has run 2,000 vacuum chamber experiments showing a propellantless thrust force that persists after the power is switched off, and cannot be explained by ion wind, magnetic effects, or classical energy conservation. The input is pure electricity and the output is millinewtons of thrust counteracting gravity. He believes his work vindicates the legacy of midcentury antigravity pioneer Thomas Townsend Brown and will lead to a new paradigm of propellantless deep space travel that transcends chemical combustion rockets🚨 Charles Buhler has a PhD in condensed matter physics from Florida State University, spent over two decades at NASA's Electrostatics and Surface Physics Laboratory at Kennedy Space Center (which he now leads), and is the incoming president of the Electrostatic Society of America. He is NASA’s authority on electrostatics. His colleague Andrew Aurigema, a 35-year veteran engineer working from the Townsend Brown electrogravitics lineage, developed a parallel version of the same experiment independently, and the two discovered each other through a mutual colleague who had been watching both of them work in silence for years. Together, under their company Exodus Propulsion Technologies, they have tested nearly 2,000 variations of what they believe is a previously undocumented force. He’s also developed a quantum electrodynamics based theory to explain his results. Buhler’s patent is now under formal examination by the U.S. Patent Office with affidavit-signing witnesses being contacted independently. This is the future of space travel, beyond chemical combustion. With Rocketry, we can only get to Proxima Centauri B in 80,000 years. And you’d burn through the fuel well before that. It’s completely untenable for interstellar travel. 1. Buhler’s Skeptic Mentor Stopped Cold in 2010 The first demonstration happened in a non-vacuum lab using a laser aimed at a wall to detect small displacements. Buhler had his future brother-in-law run the test. His mentor, Dr. Sid Clements, an electrostatics expert who had dismissed the work entirely, watched the laser move and immediately abandoned what he was doing. He walked over, ran through a series of verification steps on the spot, and never questioned the reality of the effect again. That was 2010. It took two more years working with Drew before Buhler realized the force appeared even without any B field or current present. He wasn't in the field momentum regime at all. He was in pure electrostatics. 2. The Force is Not Explainable by Newton’s Laws or Ion Wind Ion wind produces thrust in the same direction the ionized air is traveling. The “Exodus force” (Buhler’s name for his new force) produces thrust perpendicular to the expected ion wind direction, reverses cleanly when the device is flipped, and remains present inside a sealed enclosure where no ionized air can escape. Buhler documented this publicly with video: a balsa lifter placed inside a sealed plastic box on a scale, powered up, lifts internally while the scale reads flat. That is conservation of momentum. That is what ion wind looks like. The Exodus force is something different, and Buhler, as the person who leads NASA's only electrostatics lab, is in an unambiguous position to make that distinction. 3. 2,000 Variations, All Producing the Same Result Since beginning collaboration with Drew, Buhler has tracked nearly 2,000 distinct test articles, each tested multiple times. Pendulums. Spinners. Rotators. Force plates. Scales. Pendulum deflections inside Faraday cages. Reversed polarity tests. Vacuum chamber runs at multiple pressure levels. DC-only configurations that eliminate magnetic field artifacts entirely. Every geometry, every material, every packaging approach. The force appears consistently. When a confounding variable is proposed, they address it, run the modified test, and the force is still there. Buhler says if an exotic explanation remains, it is not one he or any colleague has been able to name. 4. The Device Generates Thrust With the Power Off This is the finding that breaks the classical framework entirely. After charging the device and disconnecting it from the power supply, the thrust continues. The capacitor does not drain in the way a simple energy storage calculation would predict. Put on a scale, the weight reduction persists. Buhler's description: if placed in space with the power off, the device would accelerate. He cannot explain that to the scientific community and says so directly. David Chester, who has independently interacted with Drew through APEC sessions and private communications, said he cannot think of a prosaic explanation for this. The phenomenon has been reproduced enough times across enough configurations that calling it experimental error is no longer a defensible position. 5. The Implications of This for Past Antigravity Work Buhler believes his work is derivative of and related to Townsend Brown’s midcentury asymmetric capacitor experiments also showing thrust with pure electricity as the input. Chemical combustion is limited - plain and simple - we can’t get to the nearest habitable planet (Proxima Centauri B) in close the amount of time we’d need; it would take us 80,000 years and we’d burn through the fuel before we got there. It’s a checkmate in one argument against anyone claiming rockets are the frontier of efficiency. This was the dream of Thomas Townsend Brown – one that got stifled and suppressed behind the veil of secrecy and subcompartments. The common trope from experiments around the world are high electric field differentials seem to result in thrust. Buhler’s experiment exists in this lineage. 6. The Patent Office is Running the Peer Review Buhler made a deliberate choice not to pursue academic peer review as a primary path. His second patent is currently under examination, and the examiner's office has been reaching out to independent witnesses who have signed affidavits confirming they have seen and reproduced the effect. Buhler describes this as equivalent to scientific peer review, run by people with no financial interest in the outcome. His first patent may have been held under a national security review process before release. He does not confirm this, but he was aware it was a risk when he filed. 7. A QED Theorist Could Poke Holes in the Theory, But Not the Experiment We brought in UCLA PhD David Chester to evaluate Buhler’s ideas on quantum electrodynamics (which might account for the thrust being seen). David Chester's contribution was not to validate the theory Buhler proposed. He found some issues with the specific scalar virtual photon framing Buhler had developed. What Chester could not do was provide a prosaic explanation for the experimental results themselves. He said directly that, of all the anomalous phenomena he has surveyed, Buhler and Drew's work ranks in the top ten for experimental persuasiveness, specifically because of the iteration rate and the self-consistency across configurations. He noted that Drew's innovation rate alone, constantly testing new geometries and material stacks, is unlike anything he has seen from other groups making similar claims. Buhler pointed out that his theories were based on time-independent perturbation theory which Chester admits requires further examination from him. 8. NASA's UAP Investigation Had No Physicists Buhler and his wife, an engineer in NASA's Launch Services Program, were approached to assist with NASA's second UAP follow-on investigation. When Buhler asked to be placed with the physicists on the project, he was told there were none. The group was instrumentation-focused. Buhler says he was genuinely shocked. His reaction, expressed directly: if you are facing objects that defy the laws of physics, why is there not a single physicist in the room. He described the same reaction Eric Davis has expressed publicly. This is either institutional brain death or something else is happening somewhere else. 9. Six Lights Emerged from the Ocean Near Patrick Air Force Base Around 2013, Buhler and his wife were alone on the beach near Cocoa Beach, Florida, three miles south of Patrick Air Force Base. A red light appeared roughly three miles offshore, grew extremely bright, then appeared to explode, lighting the full length of beach. A helicopter launched from Patrick Air Force Base, flew to the location, hovered briefly, and returned to base without intervening. The light did not stop. It began moving toward them. At some point it split from one light into six rotating orange-pink lights that went under the water and re-emerged in a repeating cycle. The lights tracked their movement along the beach for forty minutes, closing to within roughly fifty yards before disappearing. Buhler says similar lights have been reported by others in the same area, and Stephen Greer runs group observation sessions approximately forty minutes south of the same beach. 10. The Force Crosses the Unity Threshold for Space Already The current demonstrated force is in the five to ten millinewton range. For Earth launch, that is not yet sufficient, and Buhler does not claim otherwise. For orbital station-keeping, for preventing satellite orbital decay, for repositioning between orbits in microgravity, the force exceeds what is needed. Buhler calls this hitting unity for space, moon, and Mars applications without any major development beyond what has already been demonstrated. The self-launcher, a device capable of lifting itself from Earth's surface, is the declared goal. No blueprints exist yet for the energy requirements. But the force is real, it is directional, it reverses on command, and it does not require continuous power to sustain. Why This Matters NASA's lead electrostatics scientist ran nearly 2,000 controlled experiments, eliminated every prosaic explanation the field has available, documented a thrust that persists after the power is cut, watched the fine structure constant emerge from the data repeatedly, and submitted a second patent currently under formal examination. A QED theorist with no commercial stake in the outcome reviewed the experimental claims and could not find a conventional explanation. The standard debunking line for this entire lineage of experiments has always been ion wind. That argument has been answered, documented, and filmed. What remains is a force that requires either new physics or an error that two decades of systematic testing has not been able to locate. The patent process will resolve part of this. The vacuum chamber footage will resolve more of it. Full conversation is live now. The next stage in human space travel is here.

Jesse Michels

877,031 次观看 • 5 个月前

Chris Bledsoe: “I’m filming angelic beings with wings… I have one on video big as a Cessna 150. To me that would be the Seraphim from The Bible.” 🛸😱 In a new interview, Bledsoe says the green orbs his family has filmed for years are the same phenomenon documented over nuclear sites in the late 1940s and 1950s. “100% it’s the same thing,” he said. He claims there are at least three levels of what he is seeing. Some appear as orbs. Others, he says, are winged beings that fly overhead while groups of witnesses watch. “They fly over flapping. Sometimes 25 of them appear right over our group blowing red or white or gray.” The green ones are different. “The green orbs come with a message when they come. They’re talking.” He calls them a special communicator and says a NASA scientist told him one appears to follow him “like a pilot to watch over me.” Bledsoe says he has collected this footage for years and only now started showing some of it publicly. He ties the green orbs to a larger shift he believes is coming. Watch the clip and decide what you think. What would convince you this is communication and not just lights in the sky?

Chris Bledsoe: “I’m filming angelic beings with wings… I have one on video big as a Cessna 150. To me that would be the Seraphim from The Bible.” 🛸😱 In a new interview, Bledsoe says the green orbs his family has filmed for years are the same phenomenon documented over nuclear sites in the late 1940s and 1950s. “100% it’s the same thing,” he said. He claims there are at least three levels of what he is seeing. Some appear as orbs. Others, he says, are winged beings that fly overhead while groups of witnesses watch. “They fly over flapping. Sometimes 25 of them appear right over our group blowing red or white or gray.” The green ones are different. “The green orbs come with a message when they come. They’re talking.” He calls them a special communicator and says a NASA scientist told him one appears to follow him “like a pilot to watch over me.” Bledsoe says he has collected this footage for years and only now started showing some of it publicly. He ties the green orbs to a larger shift he believes is coming. Watch the clip and decide what you think. What would convince you this is communication and not just lights in the sky?

Interstellar

22,497 次观看 • 15 天前

Ben Affleck says actors have no job security because 130K people are in the actors union and only 30,000 work each year "I got real cold and had a couple of movies that didn't work... all of a sudden it can be kind of over for you" "there's no seniority, there's no tenure, there's no retirement. There's no gold watch" "if your show doesn't work or your movie doesn't work and nobody wants to hire you, they're just gonna hire someone else" "there's 130,000 people in SAG and there's only 30,000 people that work every year"

Ben Affleck says actors have no job security because 130K people are in the actors union and only 30,000 work each year "I got real cold and had a couple of movies that didn't work... all of a sudden it can be kind of over for you" "there's no seniority, there's no tenure, there's no retirement. There's no gold watch" "if your show doesn't work or your movie doesn't work and nobody wants to hire you, they're just gonna hire someone else" "there's 130,000 people in SAG and there's only 30,000 people that work every year"

Yonan

5,255,030 次观看 • 3 个月前

ABC News moderator Whoopi Goldberg falsely claims "they're planning on a draft" to go fight Iran. One cast member thinks she'd be drafted, another says he just beat the a revised cut off. Fact check: misinformation. There is no draft and none of them filled out Selective Service cards. Transcript: ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: Keep in mind the Iranian regime is the biggest state sponsor o terrorism. Ten years from now, 20 years from now, they may try to strike the homeland, they may try to strike troops in the region. This doesn't go away just because you sign a piece of paper. WHOOPI GOLDBERG: No, nothing goes away. And hat's why they're planning on a draft! They're planning on a draft! And you're bitching and moaning that there are women who are part of the - the Army, Navy, all the - and you're getting rid of people and talking about who shouldn't be -- what the hell are you people doing?! FARAH GRIFFIN: What it is is they're changing that you no longer - you used to have to opt into the draft, now it makes it automatic. GOLDBERG: It's a draft! I can sorry, it's a draft! Because if you are 18 to 25, they're looking at you! SARA HAINES: Well, they're increasing that age, too - GOLDBERG: How old is it now? HAINES: I think it's 42. FARAH GRIFFIN: Oh I'm - (as if she'd be drafted). ANA NAVARRO: Why don't we make it 80? HAINES: I just made it! I'm just kidding. NAVARRO: Make it 80 and see how he feels about it. [Applause] GOLDBERG Well, he has sores. Right? NAVARRO: Bone spurs. GOLDBERG: He has bone spurs. He has bone spurs.

ABC News moderator Whoopi Goldberg falsely claims "they're planning on a draft" to go fight Iran. One cast member thinks she'd be drafted, another says he just beat the a revised cut off. Fact check: misinformation. There is no draft and none of them filled out Selective Service cards. Transcript: ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: Keep in mind the Iranian regime is the biggest state sponsor o terrorism. Ten years from now, 20 years from now, they may try to strike the homeland, they may try to strike troops in the region. This doesn't go away just because you sign a piece of paper. WHOOPI GOLDBERG: No, nothing goes away. And hat's why they're planning on a draft! They're planning on a draft! And you're bitching and moaning that there are women who are part of the - the Army, Navy, all the - and you're getting rid of people and talking about who shouldn't be -- what the hell are you people doing?! FARAH GRIFFIN: What it is is they're changing that you no longer - you used to have to opt into the draft, now it makes it automatic. GOLDBERG: It's a draft! I can sorry, it's a draft! Because if you are 18 to 25, they're looking at you! SARA HAINES: Well, they're increasing that age, too - GOLDBERG: How old is it now? HAINES: I think it's 42. FARAH GRIFFIN: Oh I'm - (as if she'd be drafted). ANA NAVARRO: Why don't we make it 80? HAINES: I just made it! I'm just kidding. NAVARRO: Make it 80 and see how he feels about it. [Applause] GOLDBERG Well, he has sores. Right? NAVARRO: Bone spurs. GOLDBERG: He has bone spurs. He has bone spurs.

Nicholas Fondacaro

41,865 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨🇮🇷 🇺🇸 IS THIS PEACE OR JUST A LONGER PAUSE? Norwegian political scientist Glenn Diesen says don't get too comfortable with the ceasefire. Israel has already used prior pauses as cover to escalate. And with too many parties unable to concede anything publicly, a real peace deal may not be possible. He says extended ceasefires might be the ceiling. Not peace. Just managed intervals between the next round. The guns going quiet means nothing if the politics underneath stay broken. And right now, every side has a reason to restart. Glenn Diesen

🚨🇮🇷 🇺🇸 IS THIS PEACE OR JUST A LONGER PAUSE? Norwegian political scientist Glenn Diesen says don't get too comfortable with the ceasefire. Israel has already used prior pauses as cover to escalate. And with too many parties unable to concede anything publicly, a real peace deal may not be possible. He says extended ceasefires might be the ceiling. Not peace. Just managed intervals between the next round. The guns going quiet means nothing if the politics underneath stay broken. And right now, every side has a reason to restart. Glenn Diesen

Mario Nawfal

55,234 次观看 • 5 个月前

There's no such thing as a postpartum chemical imbalance. Dr. Roger McFillin calls the theory "a complete lie," one he says has been pushed on the American public since the 1990s specifically to sell psychiatric drugs. He points to Hardin's first law of human ecology: you are never intervening with just one thing. Since these drugs became standard prescriptions, we've seen an increase in all identifiable statistics around worsening mental health. That doesn't mean people aren't genuinely struggling. Postpartum is a real and difficult period. Hormonal shifts, sleep deprivation, nutritional deficiencies, and a mountain of psychosocial pressure, marriage strain, inadequate support, economic demands pulling both parents back to work, all collide at once. Dr. McFillin says the message women get first is that something is wrong with them, when the truth is they're mothers overwhelmed trying to meet three children's needs without enough support. That's what he says is playing out in the Lindsey Clancy case: pressure to return to work colliding with a culture that's lost a sense of what's normal, leaving women in battle with their own minds, carrying fear, guilt, and insecurity into a medical system that treats those feelings as symptoms of an underlying condition, then prescribes a drug with a poor efficacy and safety record. Tracy Thurman Dr. Roger McFillin

There's no such thing as a postpartum chemical imbalance. Dr. Roger McFillin calls the theory "a complete lie," one he says has been pushed on the American public since the 1990s specifically to sell psychiatric drugs. He points to Hardin's first law of human ecology: you are never intervening with just one thing. Since these drugs became standard prescriptions, we've seen an increase in all identifiable statistics around worsening mental health. That doesn't mean people aren't genuinely struggling. Postpartum is a real and difficult period. Hormonal shifts, sleep deprivation, nutritional deficiencies, and a mountain of psychosocial pressure, marriage strain, inadequate support, economic demands pulling both parents back to work, all collide at once. Dr. McFillin says the message women get first is that something is wrong with them, when the truth is they're mothers overwhelmed trying to meet three children's needs without enough support. That's what he says is playing out in the Lindsey Clancy case: pressure to return to work colliding with a culture that's lost a sense of what's normal, leaving women in battle with their own minds, carrying fear, guilt, and insecurity into a medical system that treats those feelings as symptoms of an underlying condition, then prescribes a drug with a poor efficacy and safety record. Tracy Thurman Dr. Roger McFillin

The HighWire

12,128 次观看 • 19 天前

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump has just launched a MASSIVE H-1B visa fraud investigation within the Labor Department DOZENS of subpoenas going out right now. Whistleblowers coming forward There is reportedly "fraud and HUMAN TRAFFICKING within the H-1B program" 🤯 Holy crap! SHUT IT ALL DOWN! "We have whistleblowers talking about some of the biggest companies." "We are going to work with the President and VP's task force to exhaust every lead."

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump has just launched a MASSIVE H-1B visa fraud investigation within the Labor Department DOZENS of subpoenas going out right now. Whistleblowers coming forward There is reportedly "fraud and HUMAN TRAFFICKING within the H-1B program" 🤯 Holy crap! SHUT IT ALL DOWN! "We have whistleblowers talking about some of the biggest companies." "We are going to work with the President and VP's task force to exhaust every lead."

Eric Daugherty

656,271 次观看 • 2 个月前

California Governor candidate Chad Bianco says Democrats planned for ICE to have to come into communities, they did it on purpose He says Democrats passed SB 54 He warned before they did this that if they passed this, it would force ICE to have to enter communities “We absolutely told that law enforcement said — This is what's going to happen if you, if you do this, ICE is going to have to go into communities to find these people because they're criminals. They're victimizing us Right now. They just come into the jail and the safety of a jail. Nobody knows it's happening and they just deport them. If you make this law, ICE is going to have to go into the streets and this is what you're going to have — That's what we're really seeing right now, is Democrats purposely knowingly made sanctuary states and cities to force ICE on the ground so they could create this” “That's fu*king insane” “Absolutely, it is. They knew it was going to happen” He says they did it for votes, and to create a spectacle for votes Democrats are the worse enemy America has

California Governor candidate Chad Bianco says Democrats planned for ICE to have to come into communities, they did it on purpose He says Democrats passed SB 54 He warned before they did this that if they passed this, it would force ICE to have to enter communities “We absolutely told that law enforcement said — This is what's going to happen if you, if you do this, ICE is going to have to go into communities to find these people because they're criminals. They're victimizing us Right now. They just come into the jail and the safety of a jail. Nobody knows it's happening and they just deport them. If you make this law, ICE is going to have to go into the streets and this is what you're going to have — That's what we're really seeing right now, is Democrats purposely knowingly made sanctuary states and cities to force ICE on the ground so they could create this” “That's fu*king insane” “Absolutely, it is. They knew it was going to happen” He says they did it for votes, and to create a spectacle for votes Democrats are the worse enemy America has

Wall Street Apes

77,113 次观看 • 4 个月前

A Muslim from Bangladesh moved to London and now works in the visa office in Italy He believes in Sharia Law and says all Muslims who come over will believe in Sharia Law Again, this is a Visa officer in European Union. What could go wrong… Nate Friedman “It's very difficult to ID someone if just their eyes are showing. Do you see that as a problem?” “I don't know”

A Muslim from Bangladesh moved to London and now works in the visa office in Italy He believes in Sharia Law and says all Muslims who come over will believe in Sharia Law Again, this is a Visa officer in European Union. What could go wrong… Nate Friedman “It's very difficult to ID someone if just their eyes are showing. Do you see that as a problem?” “I don't know”

Wall Street Apes

316,655 次观看 • 6 个月前

Former Air Force Pilot Breaks Silence: 'UFOs Are Real, and the Government Knows It!'" A former Air Force pilot has spoken out, declaring that UFOs—now officially referred to as UAPs—are not just real but that the government is actively covering up the truth. As these mysterious objects continue to dominate the skies, the question looms large: What are they, and why is the public being kept in the dark? If these unidentified crafts pose a hostile threat, the time for secrecy is over. The American people deserve answers, and if necessary, action. Shoot them down if they’re hostile, but the truth can no longer be hidden. 🚨 #UFOs #Breaking #NationalSecurity #UAPs #ExposeTheTruth

Former Air Force Pilot Breaks Silence: 'UFOs Are Real, and the Government Knows It!'" A former Air Force pilot has spoken out, declaring that UFOs—now officially referred to as UAPs—are not just real but that the government is actively covering up the truth. As these mysterious objects continue to dominate the skies, the question looms large: What are they, and why is the public being kept in the dark? If these unidentified crafts pose a hostile threat, the time for secrecy is over. The American people deserve answers, and if necessary, action. Shoot them down if they’re hostile, but the truth can no longer be hidden. 🚨 #UFOs #Breaking #NationalSecurity #UAPs #ExposeTheTruth

Jim Ferguson

771,214 次观看 • 1 年前

Bill O’Reilly says it’s important to remember one thing about what Tim Walz is doing: he’s protecting foreign FUGITIVES with FEDERAL warrants. He predicts that Jacob Frey is in DEEP trouble and warns that if he is charged with a federal crime, “All HELL will break loose in this country.” O’REILLY: “These people, these foreign nationals in the Minnesota jails are fugitives.” “Everybody should remember that. They’re fugitives.” “So what Walz is doing, because the jails are the subject of his office, the sheriff’s and all, is he’s protecting fugitives.” “It’s outrageous!” “And all he has to do is tell Ellison—Ellison’s a lackey, a far-left lackey—just let ICE and take these people because they have federal warrant out.” “And on a federal warrant plateau, Frey has to appear Tuesday at 09:00am in U.S. Federal court in Minneapolis to answer a subpoena.” “He has to testify in front of a grand jury.” “And I hope that the Justice Department, a lot of people disagree with me on this, will charge him with some kind of federal crime.” “And he’s in trouble, Frey. Big trouble.” “Now, if they do that, all hell is going to break loose. Katie, all hell will break loose in this country.”

Bill O’Reilly says it’s important to remember one thing about what Tim Walz is doing: he’s protecting foreign FUGITIVES with FEDERAL warrants. He predicts that Jacob Frey is in DEEP trouble and warns that if he is charged with a federal crime, “All HELL will break loose in this country.” O’REILLY: “These people, these foreign nationals in the Minnesota jails are fugitives.” “Everybody should remember that. They’re fugitives.” “So what Walz is doing, because the jails are the subject of his office, the sheriff’s and all, is he’s protecting fugitives.” “It’s outrageous!” “And all he has to do is tell Ellison—Ellison’s a lackey, a far-left lackey—just let ICE and take these people because they have federal warrant out.” “And on a federal warrant plateau, Frey has to appear Tuesday at 09:00am in U.S. Federal court in Minneapolis to answer a subpoena.” “He has to testify in front of a grand jury.” “And I hope that the Justice Department, a lot of people disagree with me on this, will charge him with some kind of federal crime.” “And he’s in trouble, Frey. Big trouble.” “Now, if they do that, all hell is going to break loose. Katie, all hell will break loose in this country.”

Overton

255,682 次观看 • 7 个月前

Intel CEO on working with Elon Musk: "Elon Musk, I think we all agree is one of the best entrepreneur in this century. He and we share the same view. It's just delighted to work with him. He's very unconventional. He question every step and why this traditional way of doing things and I like that. We both are going to learn a lot together. He have a vision that his robots and his car, he needs a lot of silicon. We are delighted to work with him on Terafab. He has a very good team that I work with weekly and it's just refreshing to work with him." via No Priors

Intel CEO on working with Elon Musk: "Elon Musk, I think we all agree is one of the best entrepreneur in this century. He and we share the same view. It's just delighted to work with him. He's very unconventional. He question every step and why this traditional way of doing things and I like that. We both are going to learn a lot together. He have a vision that his robots and his car, he needs a lot of silicon. We are delighted to work with him on Terafab. He has a very good team that I work with weekly and it's just refreshing to work with him." via No Priors

DogeDesigner

98,805 次观看 • 3 个月前

Daniel Baldwin says there are currently bidding wars going on in Hollywood where celebrities are buying Diddy tapes to save themselves from being exposed. The comments were made on the PBD podcast. “He has videos of the parties… I've heard from friends that are attorneys… is there's a bidding war going on right now.” “They're driving that price up because if you want your client and your famous actor to not be involved, a famous singer to not come out, here's the price, and that they're just selling to the individuals that are in those.” “This is what I heard. They're selling those videos.”

Daniel Baldwin says there are currently bidding wars going on in Hollywood where celebrities are buying Diddy tapes to save themselves from being exposed. The comments were made on the PBD podcast. “He has videos of the parties… I've heard from friends that are attorneys… is there's a bidding war going on right now.” “They're driving that price up because if you want your client and your famous actor to not be involved, a famous singer to not come out, here's the price, and that they're just selling to the individuals that are in those.” “This is what I heard. They're selling those videos.”

Collin Rugg

4,382,518 次观看 • 1 年前

#BREAKING Anthony Albanese angrily responds to news that Angus Taylor has said that the door is open for a preference deal with One Nation: “The door isn’t open, there’s no door, they’re in the same room” “One Nation, the Liberal party and the Nationals, there are now 3 right wing parties in Australia” “All advocating policies that aren’t in the interests of social cohesion that’s needed to bring the country together” “Angus Taylor’s budget reply where he tried to separate Australians from migrants singling out migrants as if they’re not contributing to this country” “You would have no construction, if you had no migrants” “Hospitals would close if you had no migrants” This bloke has lost the plot. He honestly believes Australians do not work in construction and Australians are not doctors and nurses. Forgetting that Aussies have built this country from its foundations in 1788 to what it is today. He has just disrespected every Australian in this country, with that statement.

#BREAKING Anthony Albanese angrily responds to news that Angus Taylor has said that the door is open for a preference deal with One Nation: “The door isn’t open, there’s no door, they’re in the same room” “One Nation, the Liberal party and the Nationals, there are now 3 right wing parties in Australia” “All advocating policies that aren’t in the interests of social cohesion that’s needed to bring the country together” “Angus Taylor’s budget reply where he tried to separate Australians from migrants singling out migrants as if they’re not contributing to this country” “You would have no construction, if you had no migrants” “Hospitals would close if you had no migrants” This bloke has lost the plot. He honestly believes Australians do not work in construction and Australians are not doctors and nurses. Forgetting that Aussies have built this country from its foundations in 1788 to what it is today. He has just disrespected every Australian in this country, with that statement.

Ryan Dally

142,835 次观看 • 4 个月前

Sequoia’s Julien Bek says many of their founders are now wondering if they’re “just an iteration away” from AI labs destroying their business. He says the most defensible companies - and potentially the next trillion-dollar company - will be “a software business that masquerades as a services firm.” “If you sell tools today, you’re really in the line of sight for the models and you’re effectively competing with the next generation that they’re going to launch.” “Whereas if you sell the work, you’re actually benefiting from what the models are doing and all the billions of dollars that are going towards AI.”

Sequoia’s Julien Bek says many of their founders are now wondering if they’re “just an iteration away” from AI labs destroying their business. He says the most defensible companies - and potentially the next trillion-dollar company - will be “a software business that masquerades as a services firm.” “If you sell tools today, you’re really in the line of sight for the models and you’re effectively competing with the next generation that they’re going to launch.” “Whereas if you sell the work, you’re actually benefiting from what the models are doing and all the billions of dollars that are going towards AI.”

TBPN

684,521 次观看 • 6 个月前

Terence Tao, UCLA mathematics professor and Fields Medallist, on why AI may be succeeding at science while scientists get worse at it: Tao starts by naming the tension directly: "There is this paradox that on the one hand AIs are becoming more powerful and more capable and making fewer mistakes, and they are ostensibly achieving a lot of the goals that we think scientists are trying to do. They're running experiments. They're analyzing data. They're writing papers." Experiments run, data analyzed, papers written — the exact outputs any university or funding body would cite as proof that science is working. Tao's concern is what those outputs stop telling you: "It may be that it comes at the cost of the AI picks up some skill but no human scientist gets any better at doing the science." The skill still accumulates, just in the wrong place. The system gets more capable while the people operating it stand still, because the work that used to build a researcher is now the work being handed off. And the cost shows up in the one thing scientists are supposed to be able to do: "No human can communicate exactly what just happened and why. This scientific discovery is interesting, why this proof is new and what features it has and how it connects." That final clause is the sharp end of it. Tao is describing a result nobody can place — a proof that arrives with no one able to say what makes it new, how it's built, or how it connects to the rest of the field. Understanding is a separate achievement from getting the answer, and it can quietly disappear while the answers keep arriving on schedule. Which is why he thinks the target itself needs re-examining: "We may have to sort of redesign our conception of what science is and what we actually want out of science. What exactly is science for and what are we trying to do? And is there a danger that we are optimizing the wrong thing when we are pointing our AI tools at science?"

Terence Tao, UCLA mathematics professor and Fields Medallist, on why AI may be succeeding at science while scientists get worse at it: Tao starts by naming the tension directly: "There is this paradox that on the one hand AIs are becoming more powerful and more capable and making fewer mistakes, and they are ostensibly achieving a lot of the goals that we think scientists are trying to do. They're running experiments. They're analyzing data. They're writing papers." Experiments run, data analyzed, papers written — the exact outputs any university or funding body would cite as proof that science is working. Tao's concern is what those outputs stop telling you: "It may be that it comes at the cost of the AI picks up some skill but no human scientist gets any better at doing the science." The skill still accumulates, just in the wrong place. The system gets more capable while the people operating it stand still, because the work that used to build a researcher is now the work being handed off. And the cost shows up in the one thing scientists are supposed to be able to do: "No human can communicate exactly what just happened and why. This scientific discovery is interesting, why this proof is new and what features it has and how it connects." That final clause is the sharp end of it. Tao is describing a result nobody can place — a proof that arrives with no one able to say what makes it new, how it's built, or how it connects to the rest of the field. Understanding is a separate achievement from getting the answer, and it can quietly disappear while the answers keep arriving on schedule. Which is why he thinks the target itself needs re-examining: "We may have to sort of redesign our conception of what science is and what we actually want out of science. What exactly is science for and what are we trying to do? And is there a danger that we are optimizing the wrong thing when we are pointing our AI tools at science?"

Big Brain AI

42,366 次观看 • 10 天前

Meiselas: Donald Trump is such a loser, and he's been such a loser his whole life. And you wonder why all of his businesses have been losers? Because this is how he behaves. He just likes the drama and the chaos. He was born with the golden spoon in his mouth, he's never had to face ramifications in his life for doing stupid shit. If he was just some crappy, scummy billionaire who lived in Florida, they are a dime a dozen. Do you think I'd give a crap? My issue is this freaking loser, this con artist, this grifter, this scammer has brought his life of scamming and bankrupting casinos and destroying people's lives, which is bad enough that that's how he was using his privilege and wealth — and now he's doing it to the United States, where now the American people are the ones who are suffering, not just the people who work for him. And we're seeing what that's like. They can go all they want, "Oh, inflation's being reduced." No, it's not. "Oh, the housing market has never been better." No, it's never been worse. Shut up. "Oh, everybody's getting jobs." No, jobless claims are surging. Shut up. Stop lying. The American people know that you're an idiot right now. It's just ridiculous. A bunch of freaking buffoons right now. And the American people know.

Meiselas: Donald Trump is such a loser, and he's been such a loser his whole life. And you wonder why all of his businesses have been losers? Because this is how he behaves. He just likes the drama and the chaos. He was born with the golden spoon in his mouth, he's never had to face ramifications in his life for doing stupid shit. If he was just some crappy, scummy billionaire who lived in Florida, they are a dime a dozen. Do you think I'd give a crap? My issue is this freaking loser, this con artist, this grifter, this scammer has brought his life of scamming and bankrupting casinos and destroying people's lives, which is bad enough that that's how he was using his privilege and wealth — and now he's doing it to the United States, where now the American people are the ones who are suffering, not just the people who work for him. And we're seeing what that's like. They can go all they want, "Oh, inflation's being reduced." No, it's not. "Oh, the housing market has never been better." No, it's never been worse. Shut up. "Oh, everybody's getting jobs." No, jobless claims are surging. Shut up. Stop lying. The American people know that you're an idiot right now. It's just ridiculous. A bunch of freaking buffoons right now. And the American people know.

MeidasTouch

284,067 次观看 • 10 个月前