Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

A NASA scientist built a device that produces thrust with no fuel, no propellant, and no exhaust! The force appears to come from nowhere. It runs on electric fields alone. Thousands of tests have been completed. Tests done in vacuum chambers with Ion wind being ruled out. A theoretical... show more

American Alchemy

40,796 subscribers

19,075 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

NASA's lead electrostatics scientist says he has 2,000 experiments showing a force that shouldn't exist. Dr. Charles Buhler has spent over a decade testing what appears to be propellantless thrust. This is a real, repeatable, directional force with no fuel, no exhaust, just electricity. Teams in Germany and Japan are now reproducing similar results independently and Buhler says the work may finally vindicate Thomas Townsend Brown's work. If 2,000 experiments are all wrong, that's one hell of a coincidence. If they're right, chemical rockets just became obsolete. Episode out now.

NASA's lead electrostatics scientist says he has 2,000 experiments showing a force that shouldn't exist. Dr. Charles Buhler has spent over a decade testing what appears to be propellantless thrust. This is a real, repeatable, directional force with no fuel, no exhaust, just electricity. Teams in Germany and Japan are now reproducing similar results independently and Buhler says the work may finally vindicate Thomas Townsend Brown's work. If 2,000 experiments are all wrong, that's one hell of a coincidence. If they're right, chemical rockets just became obsolete. Episode out now.

American Alchemy

90,386 views • 5 months ago

🚨BREAKING: NASA's Lead Electrostatics Scientist claims he’s discovered a “new force” that counteracts gravity with no fuel necessary. Dr. Charles Buhler has run 2,000 vacuum chamber experiments showing a propellantless thrust force that persists after the power is switched off, and cannot be explained by ion wind, magnetic effects, or classical energy conservation. The input is pure electricity and the output is millinewtons of thrust counteracting gravity. He believes his work vindicates the legacy of midcentury antigravity pioneer Thomas Townsend Brown and will lead to a new paradigm of propellantless deep space travel that transcends chemical combustion rockets🚨 Charles Buhler has a PhD in condensed matter physics from Florida State University, spent over two decades at NASA's Electrostatics and Surface Physics Laboratory at Kennedy Space Center (which he now leads), and is the incoming president of the Electrostatic Society of America. He is NASA’s authority on electrostatics. His colleague Andrew Aurigema, a 35-year veteran engineer working from the Townsend Brown electrogravitics lineage, developed a parallel version of the same experiment independently, and the two discovered each other through a mutual colleague who had been watching both of them work in silence for years. Together, under their company Exodus Propulsion Technologies, they have tested nearly 2,000 variations of what they believe is a previously undocumented force. He’s also developed a quantum electrodynamics based theory to explain his results. Buhler’s patent is now under formal examination by the U.S. Patent Office with affidavit-signing witnesses being contacted independently. This is the future of space travel, beyond chemical combustion. With Rocketry, we can only get to Proxima Centauri B in 80,000 years. And you’d burn through the fuel well before that. It’s completely untenable for interstellar travel. 1. Buhler’s Skeptic Mentor Stopped Cold in 2010 The first demonstration happened in a non-vacuum lab using a laser aimed at a wall to detect small displacements. Buhler had his future brother-in-law run the test. His mentor, Dr. Sid Clements, an electrostatics expert who had dismissed the work entirely, watched the laser move and immediately abandoned what he was doing. He walked over, ran through a series of verification steps on the spot, and never questioned the reality of the effect again. That was 2010. It took two more years working with Drew before Buhler realized the force appeared even without any B field or current present. He wasn't in the field momentum regime at all. He was in pure electrostatics. 2. The Force is Not Explainable by Newton’s Laws or Ion Wind Ion wind produces thrust in the same direction the ionized air is traveling. The “Exodus force” (Buhler’s name for his new force) produces thrust perpendicular to the expected ion wind direction, reverses cleanly when the device is flipped, and remains present inside a sealed enclosure where no ionized air can escape. Buhler documented this publicly with video: a balsa lifter placed inside a sealed plastic box on a scale, powered up, lifts internally while the scale reads flat. That is conservation of momentum. That is what ion wind looks like. The Exodus force is something different, and Buhler, as the person who leads NASA's only electrostatics lab, is in an unambiguous position to make that distinction. 3. 2,000 Variations, All Producing the Same Result Since beginning collaboration with Drew, Buhler has tracked nearly 2,000 distinct test articles, each tested multiple times. Pendulums. Spinners. Rotators. Force plates. Scales. Pendulum deflections inside Faraday cages. Reversed polarity tests. Vacuum chamber runs at multiple pressure levels. DC-only configurations that eliminate magnetic field artifacts entirely. Every geometry, every material, every packaging approach. The force appears consistently. When a confounding variable is proposed, they address it, run the modified test, and the force is still there. Buhler says if an exotic explanation remains, it is not one he or any colleague has been able to name. 4. The Device Generates Thrust With the Power Off This is the finding that breaks the classical framework entirely. After charging the device and disconnecting it from the power supply, the thrust continues. The capacitor does not drain in the way a simple energy storage calculation would predict. Put on a scale, the weight reduction persists. Buhler's description: if placed in space with the power off, the device would accelerate. He cannot explain that to the scientific community and says so directly. David Chester, who has independently interacted with Drew through APEC sessions and private communications, said he cannot think of a prosaic explanation for this. The phenomenon has been reproduced enough times across enough configurations that calling it experimental error is no longer a defensible position. 5. The Implications of This for Past Antigravity Work Buhler believes his work is derivative of and related to Townsend Brown’s midcentury asymmetric capacitor experiments also showing thrust with pure electricity as the input. Chemical combustion is limited - plain and simple - we can’t get to the nearest habitable planet (Proxima Centauri B) in close the amount of time we’d need; it would take us 80,000 years and we’d burn through the fuel before we got there. It’s a checkmate in one argument against anyone claiming rockets are the frontier of efficiency. This was the dream of Thomas Townsend Brown – one that got stifled and suppressed behind the veil of secrecy and subcompartments. The common trope from experiments around the world are high electric field differentials seem to result in thrust. Buhler’s experiment exists in this lineage. 6. The Patent Office is Running the Peer Review Buhler made a deliberate choice not to pursue academic peer review as a primary path. His second patent is currently under examination, and the examiner's office has been reaching out to independent witnesses who have signed affidavits confirming they have seen and reproduced the effect. Buhler describes this as equivalent to scientific peer review, run by people with no financial interest in the outcome. His first patent may have been held under a national security review process before release. He does not confirm this, but he was aware it was a risk when he filed. 7. A QED Theorist Could Poke Holes in the Theory, But Not the Experiment We brought in UCLA PhD David Chester to evaluate Buhler’s ideas on quantum electrodynamics (which might account for the thrust being seen). David Chester's contribution was not to validate the theory Buhler proposed. He found some issues with the specific scalar virtual photon framing Buhler had developed. What Chester could not do was provide a prosaic explanation for the experimental results themselves. He said directly that, of all the anomalous phenomena he has surveyed, Buhler and Drew's work ranks in the top ten for experimental persuasiveness, specifically because of the iteration rate and the self-consistency across configurations. He noted that Drew's innovation rate alone, constantly testing new geometries and material stacks, is unlike anything he has seen from other groups making similar claims. Buhler pointed out that his theories were based on time-independent perturbation theory which Chester admits requires further examination from him. 8. NASA's UAP Investigation Had No Physicists Buhler and his wife, an engineer in NASA's Launch Services Program, were approached to assist with NASA's second UAP follow-on investigation. When Buhler asked to be placed with the physicists on the project, he was told there were none. The group was instrumentation-focused. Buhler says he was genuinely shocked. His reaction, expressed directly: if you are facing objects that defy the laws of physics, why is there not a single physicist in the room. He described the same reaction Eric Davis has expressed publicly. This is either institutional brain death or something else is happening somewhere else. 9. Six Lights Emerged from the Ocean Near Patrick Air Force Base Around 2013, Buhler and his wife were alone on the beach near Cocoa Beach, Florida, three miles south of Patrick Air Force Base. A red light appeared roughly three miles offshore, grew extremely bright, then appeared to explode, lighting the full length of beach. A helicopter launched from Patrick Air Force Base, flew to the location, hovered briefly, and returned to base without intervening. The light did not stop. It began moving toward them. At some point it split from one light into six rotating orange-pink lights that went under the water and re-emerged in a repeating cycle. The lights tracked their movement along the beach for forty minutes, closing to within roughly fifty yards before disappearing. Buhler says similar lights have been reported by others in the same area, and Stephen Greer runs group observation sessions approximately forty minutes south of the same beach. 10. The Force Crosses the Unity Threshold for Space Already The current demonstrated force is in the five to ten millinewton range. For Earth launch, that is not yet sufficient, and Buhler does not claim otherwise. For orbital station-keeping, for preventing satellite orbital decay, for repositioning between orbits in microgravity, the force exceeds what is needed. Buhler calls this hitting unity for space, moon, and Mars applications without any major development beyond what has already been demonstrated. The self-launcher, a device capable of lifting itself from Earth's surface, is the declared goal. No blueprints exist yet for the energy requirements. But the force is real, it is directional, it reverses on command, and it does not require continuous power to sustain. Why This Matters NASA's lead electrostatics scientist ran nearly 2,000 controlled experiments, eliminated every prosaic explanation the field has available, documented a thrust that persists after the power is cut, watched the fine structure constant emerge from the data repeatedly, and submitted a second patent currently under formal examination. A QED theorist with no commercial stake in the outcome reviewed the experimental claims and could not find a conventional explanation. The standard debunking line for this entire lineage of experiments has always been ion wind. That argument has been answered, documented, and filmed. What remains is a force that requires either new physics or an error that two decades of systematic testing has not been able to locate. The patent process will resolve part of this. The vacuum chamber footage will resolve more of it. Full conversation is live now. The next stage in human space travel is here.

🚨BREAKING: NASA's Lead Electrostatics Scientist claims he’s discovered a “new force” that counteracts gravity with no fuel necessary. Dr. Charles Buhler has run 2,000 vacuum chamber experiments showing a propellantless thrust force that persists after the power is switched off, and cannot be explained by ion wind, magnetic effects, or classical energy conservation. The input is pure electricity and the output is millinewtons of thrust counteracting gravity. He believes his work vindicates the legacy of midcentury antigravity pioneer Thomas Townsend Brown and will lead to a new paradigm of propellantless deep space travel that transcends chemical combustion rockets🚨 Charles Buhler has a PhD in condensed matter physics from Florida State University, spent over two decades at NASA's Electrostatics and Surface Physics Laboratory at Kennedy Space Center (which he now leads), and is the incoming president of the Electrostatic Society of America. He is NASA’s authority on electrostatics. His colleague Andrew Aurigema, a 35-year veteran engineer working from the Townsend Brown electrogravitics lineage, developed a parallel version of the same experiment independently, and the two discovered each other through a mutual colleague who had been watching both of them work in silence for years. Together, under their company Exodus Propulsion Technologies, they have tested nearly 2,000 variations of what they believe is a previously undocumented force. He’s also developed a quantum electrodynamics based theory to explain his results. Buhler’s patent is now under formal examination by the U.S. Patent Office with affidavit-signing witnesses being contacted independently. This is the future of space travel, beyond chemical combustion. With Rocketry, we can only get to Proxima Centauri B in 80,000 years. And you’d burn through the fuel well before that. It’s completely untenable for interstellar travel. 1. Buhler’s Skeptic Mentor Stopped Cold in 2010 The first demonstration happened in a non-vacuum lab using a laser aimed at a wall to detect small displacements. Buhler had his future brother-in-law run the test. His mentor, Dr. Sid Clements, an electrostatics expert who had dismissed the work entirely, watched the laser move and immediately abandoned what he was doing. He walked over, ran through a series of verification steps on the spot, and never questioned the reality of the effect again. That was 2010. It took two more years working with Drew before Buhler realized the force appeared even without any B field or current present. He wasn't in the field momentum regime at all. He was in pure electrostatics. 2. The Force is Not Explainable by Newton’s Laws or Ion Wind Ion wind produces thrust in the same direction the ionized air is traveling. The “Exodus force” (Buhler’s name for his new force) produces thrust perpendicular to the expected ion wind direction, reverses cleanly when the device is flipped, and remains present inside a sealed enclosure where no ionized air can escape. Buhler documented this publicly with video: a balsa lifter placed inside a sealed plastic box on a scale, powered up, lifts internally while the scale reads flat. That is conservation of momentum. That is what ion wind looks like. The Exodus force is something different, and Buhler, as the person who leads NASA's only electrostatics lab, is in an unambiguous position to make that distinction. 3. 2,000 Variations, All Producing the Same Result Since beginning collaboration with Drew, Buhler has tracked nearly 2,000 distinct test articles, each tested multiple times. Pendulums. Spinners. Rotators. Force plates. Scales. Pendulum deflections inside Faraday cages. Reversed polarity tests. Vacuum chamber runs at multiple pressure levels. DC-only configurations that eliminate magnetic field artifacts entirely. Every geometry, every material, every packaging approach. The force appears consistently. When a confounding variable is proposed, they address it, run the modified test, and the force is still there. Buhler says if an exotic explanation remains, it is not one he or any colleague has been able to name. 4. The Device Generates Thrust With the Power Off This is the finding that breaks the classical framework entirely. After charging the device and disconnecting it from the power supply, the thrust continues. The capacitor does not drain in the way a simple energy storage calculation would predict. Put on a scale, the weight reduction persists. Buhler's description: if placed in space with the power off, the device would accelerate. He cannot explain that to the scientific community and says so directly. David Chester, who has independently interacted with Drew through APEC sessions and private communications, said he cannot think of a prosaic explanation for this. The phenomenon has been reproduced enough times across enough configurations that calling it experimental error is no longer a defensible position. 5. The Implications of This for Past Antigravity Work Buhler believes his work is derivative of and related to Townsend Brown’s midcentury asymmetric capacitor experiments also showing thrust with pure electricity as the input. Chemical combustion is limited - plain and simple - we can’t get to the nearest habitable planet (Proxima Centauri B) in close the amount of time we’d need; it would take us 80,000 years and we’d burn through the fuel before we got there. It’s a checkmate in one argument against anyone claiming rockets are the frontier of efficiency. This was the dream of Thomas Townsend Brown – one that got stifled and suppressed behind the veil of secrecy and subcompartments. The common trope from experiments around the world are high electric field differentials seem to result in thrust. Buhler’s experiment exists in this lineage. 6. The Patent Office is Running the Peer Review Buhler made a deliberate choice not to pursue academic peer review as a primary path. His second patent is currently under examination, and the examiner's office has been reaching out to independent witnesses who have signed affidavits confirming they have seen and reproduced the effect. Buhler describes this as equivalent to scientific peer review, run by people with no financial interest in the outcome. His first patent may have been held under a national security review process before release. He does not confirm this, but he was aware it was a risk when he filed. 7. A QED Theorist Could Poke Holes in the Theory, But Not the Experiment We brought in UCLA PhD David Chester to evaluate Buhler’s ideas on quantum electrodynamics (which might account for the thrust being seen). David Chester's contribution was not to validate the theory Buhler proposed. He found some issues with the specific scalar virtual photon framing Buhler had developed. What Chester could not do was provide a prosaic explanation for the experimental results themselves. He said directly that, of all the anomalous phenomena he has surveyed, Buhler and Drew's work ranks in the top ten for experimental persuasiveness, specifically because of the iteration rate and the self-consistency across configurations. He noted that Drew's innovation rate alone, constantly testing new geometries and material stacks, is unlike anything he has seen from other groups making similar claims. Buhler pointed out that his theories were based on time-independent perturbation theory which Chester admits requires further examination from him. 8. NASA's UAP Investigation Had No Physicists Buhler and his wife, an engineer in NASA's Launch Services Program, were approached to assist with NASA's second UAP follow-on investigation. When Buhler asked to be placed with the physicists on the project, he was told there were none. The group was instrumentation-focused. Buhler says he was genuinely shocked. His reaction, expressed directly: if you are facing objects that defy the laws of physics, why is there not a single physicist in the room. He described the same reaction Eric Davis has expressed publicly. This is either institutional brain death or something else is happening somewhere else. 9. Six Lights Emerged from the Ocean Near Patrick Air Force Base Around 2013, Buhler and his wife were alone on the beach near Cocoa Beach, Florida, three miles south of Patrick Air Force Base. A red light appeared roughly three miles offshore, grew extremely bright, then appeared to explode, lighting the full length of beach. A helicopter launched from Patrick Air Force Base, flew to the location, hovered briefly, and returned to base without intervening. The light did not stop. It began moving toward them. At some point it split from one light into six rotating orange-pink lights that went under the water and re-emerged in a repeating cycle. The lights tracked their movement along the beach for forty minutes, closing to within roughly fifty yards before disappearing. Buhler says similar lights have been reported by others in the same area, and Stephen Greer runs group observation sessions approximately forty minutes south of the same beach. 10. The Force Crosses the Unity Threshold for Space Already The current demonstrated force is in the five to ten millinewton range. For Earth launch, that is not yet sufficient, and Buhler does not claim otherwise. For orbital station-keeping, for preventing satellite orbital decay, for repositioning between orbits in microgravity, the force exceeds what is needed. Buhler calls this hitting unity for space, moon, and Mars applications without any major development beyond what has already been demonstrated. The self-launcher, a device capable of lifting itself from Earth's surface, is the declared goal. No blueprints exist yet for the energy requirements. But the force is real, it is directional, it reverses on command, and it does not require continuous power to sustain. Why This Matters NASA's lead electrostatics scientist ran nearly 2,000 controlled experiments, eliminated every prosaic explanation the field has available, documented a thrust that persists after the power is cut, watched the fine structure constant emerge from the data repeatedly, and submitted a second patent currently under formal examination. A QED theorist with no commercial stake in the outcome reviewed the experimental claims and could not find a conventional explanation. The standard debunking line for this entire lineage of experiments has always been ion wind. That argument has been answered, documented, and filmed. What remains is a force that requires either new physics or an error that two decades of systematic testing has not been able to locate. The patent process will resolve part of this. The vacuum chamber footage will resolve more of it. Full conversation is live now. The next stage in human space travel is here.

Jesse Michels

877,031 views • 5 months ago

Wow. NASA’s Lead Electrostatics Scientist just built anti-gravity propulsion. “We won’t need rockets.” “It could lead to deep space exploration.” This is about to change everything. Here’s why: 100 years ago, Thomas Townsend Brown declared that he discovered a type of anti-gravity in experiments. He coined the term “electrogravitics” to describe his discovery. In the 1950s, the military and aerospace industry showed great interest in anti-gravity, or electrogravitics, research. Then, all of a sudden, the trail went cold. UFO researchers have speculated for decades that this research was pulled into classified black projects. Now, Dr. Charles Buhler, NASA’s Lead Electrostatics Scientist and Co-Founder of Exodus Propulsion Technologies, has revived anti-gravity propulsion research. Exodus has run over 2,000 vacuum chamber experiments revealing a propellantless thrust force that cannot be dismissed by conventional explanations. Dr. Buhler just sat down with Jesse Michels to break down his revolutionary work: Michels: “You have achieved how much force roughly with your current experiments?” Dr. Charles Buhler: “Somewhere in the 5-10 millinewton range.” Michels: “If you were to apply that … in a microgravity or zero gravity environment, that would be huge.” “Could the 10 millinewtons of thrust turn into newtons of thrust?” “Could we end up launching things into space with this Exodus method?” Dr. Buhler: “That’s our main goal.” “We call it the self-launchers.” Michels: “Over the 2,000 iterations, have you gone up in newtons of thrust?” Dr. Buhler: “Sure.” Michels: “So you have a sense of the levers to get more thrust?” Dr. Buhler: “There are several, and we are trying to optimize those.” “There’s voltage, materials, properties, breakdown strength of materials, the type of signals we send, the physical limits on the materials.” Michels: “In doing these experiments, did you have access to a vacuum chamber?” “Because that’s been a lot of the reason everybody always questions me on this.” “They’re like, this experiment sounds very simple … why has nobody done it yet?” “Number one, I say people always try to explain it away via the ion wind.” “It’s always easy to say there’s ambient ionization in the vacuum.” “Number two, access to an industrial grade vacuum chamber is pretty limited and it's obviously very expensive.” “So did you have access?” Dr. Buhler: “Yes.” “[Andrew Aurigema] and I have access to a chamber, he’s got one at his house.” “He also has a second one that he’s gonna get online soon, which is almost a walk-in size vacuum chamber.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Wow. NASA’s Lead Electrostatics Scientist just built anti-gravity propulsion. “We won’t need rockets.” “It could lead to deep space exploration.” This is about to change everything. Here’s why: 100 years ago, Thomas Townsend Brown declared that he discovered a type of anti-gravity in experiments. He coined the term “electrogravitics” to describe his discovery. In the 1950s, the military and aerospace industry showed great interest in anti-gravity, or electrogravitics, research. Then, all of a sudden, the trail went cold. UFO researchers have speculated for decades that this research was pulled into classified black projects. Now, Dr. Charles Buhler, NASA’s Lead Electrostatics Scientist and Co-Founder of Exodus Propulsion Technologies, has revived anti-gravity propulsion research. Exodus has run over 2,000 vacuum chamber experiments revealing a propellantless thrust force that cannot be dismissed by conventional explanations. Dr. Buhler just sat down with Jesse Michels to break down his revolutionary work: Michels: “You have achieved how much force roughly with your current experiments?” Dr. Charles Buhler: “Somewhere in the 5-10 millinewton range.” Michels: “If you were to apply that … in a microgravity or zero gravity environment, that would be huge.” “Could the 10 millinewtons of thrust turn into newtons of thrust?” “Could we end up launching things into space with this Exodus method?” Dr. Buhler: “That’s our main goal.” “We call it the self-launchers.” Michels: “Over the 2,000 iterations, have you gone up in newtons of thrust?” Dr. Buhler: “Sure.” Michels: “So you have a sense of the levers to get more thrust?” Dr. Buhler: “There are several, and we are trying to optimize those.” “There’s voltage, materials, properties, breakdown strength of materials, the type of signals we send, the physical limits on the materials.” Michels: “In doing these experiments, did you have access to a vacuum chamber?” “Because that’s been a lot of the reason everybody always questions me on this.” “They’re like, this experiment sounds very simple … why has nobody done it yet?” “Number one, I say people always try to explain it away via the ion wind.” “It’s always easy to say there’s ambient ionization in the vacuum.” “Number two, access to an industrial grade vacuum chamber is pretty limited and it's obviously very expensive.” “So did you have access?” Dr. Buhler: “Yes.” “[Andrew Aurigema] and I have access to a chamber, he’s got one at his house.” “He also has a second one that he’s gonna get online soon, which is almost a walk-in size vacuum chamber.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Holden Culotta

24,917 views • 5 months ago

🇺🇸 A retired NASA flight surgeon says he saw a U.S. Air Force UFO in 1992. Dr. Greg Rogers claims the craft was hovering 3 feet off the ground inside a secure military facility, rotating in place with no visible propulsion and “U.S. Air Force” markings on it. When he asked where it came from, he says he was told: “We got it from them,” implying the craft was allegedly obtained from a non-human source. Writer: Sol

🇺🇸 A retired NASA flight surgeon says he saw a U.S. Air Force UFO in 1992. Dr. Greg Rogers claims the craft was hovering 3 feet off the ground inside a secure military facility, rotating in place with no visible propulsion and “U.S. Air Force” markings on it. When he asked where it came from, he says he was told: “We got it from them,” implying the craft was allegedly obtained from a non-human source. Writer: Sol

Mario Nawfal

24,209 views • 3 months ago

Michaël van de Poppe says 99% of tokens have no purpose and no value: "NEAR is one of the prime tokens we hold because of the revenue it generates and the growth rate it has." "You can model it for the coming years and build a fuel where the current price is underpriced based on market circumstances, not the token itself." "Even Aave. We hold it, but ecosystem events can still produce a drawdown. That's why allocations stay small and most of the fund runs default trading."

Michaël van de Poppe says 99% of tokens have no purpose and no value: "NEAR is one of the prime tokens we hold because of the revenue it generates and the growth rate it has." "You can model it for the coming years and build a fuel where the current price is underpriced based on market circumstances, not the token itself." "Even Aave. We hold it, but ecosystem events can still produce a drawdown. That's why allocations stay small and most of the fund runs default trading."

The Rollup

20,913 views • 4 months ago

4-year-old Brayden is autistic and nonverbal. His mother says he came home from school with unexplained injuries, including a hematoma and possible concussion. She says the school district has not explained what happened, while the district says it is investigating. How does a child come home from school with these injuries and there's NO explanation?

4-year-old Brayden is autistic and nonverbal. His mother says he came home from school with unexplained injuries, including a hematoma and possible concussion. She says the school district has not explained what happened, while the district says it is investigating. How does a child come home from school with these injuries and there's NO explanation?

Ben Crump

15,629 views • 14 days ago

Newroz celebrations in East Kurdistan are even bigger than last year. This is our culture, history, and ancient tradition. This is our identity, no one can steal it from us, and no one can force us not to celebrate it. Down with the criminal, terrorist regime of Khamenei.ir #Kurdistan #Newroz2725

Newroz celebrations in East Kurdistan are even bigger than last year. This is our culture, history, and ancient tradition. This is our identity, no one can steal it from us, and no one can force us not to celebrate it. Down with the criminal, terrorist regime of Khamenei.ir #Kurdistan #Newroz2725

Awat Berkhaneh

14,905 views • 1 year ago

Next up on Dumb Shit Cenk Uygur Says; he goes on a rant and says Israel is the enemy and that the anti Israel bias is theoretical. He says they’re done with “maniacal Israel supporters calling them names”, “now they’re in the era of them calling you names”. And that the “name they calling you has nothing to do with religion”, it has to do with anyone still supporting the “maniacal genocidal government.” And anyone doing it is a terrible person. 99% of Jews support Israel

Next up on Dumb Shit Cenk Uygur Says; he goes on a rant and says Israel is the enemy and that the anti Israel bias is theoretical. He says they’re done with “maniacal Israel supporters calling them names”, “now they’re in the era of them calling you names”. And that the “name they calling you has nothing to do with religion”, it has to do with anyone still supporting the “maniacal genocidal government.” And anyone doing it is a terrible person. 99% of Jews support Israel

Mish

34,138 views • 11 months ago

#WATCH | Thiruvananthapuram | Keralam BJP President Rajeev Chandrashekhar says, "This is a very sacred, 2,000-year-old Parshurama Temple, which is a historic site. Not only is it historic, but it is also a place where lakhs of pilgrims from across the country and the world come for the last rites of their family members. For several years, however, this temple has been neglected. The canals where the "Bali" is offered to the gods have been in disarray, with no water flow and no work done on desilting. Today, a team comprising myself, the mayor, and the councillors of the Corporation came here to assure the worshippers and stakeholders that this temple will no longer remain without a protector. This is something we are committed to. We will ensure that such neglect is never repeated. This is a very holy place, and we expect it to be treated, developed, and maintained accordingly. That is our main intention..."

#WATCH | Thiruvananthapuram | Keralam BJP President Rajeev Chandrashekhar says, "This is a very sacred, 2,000-year-old Parshurama Temple, which is a historic site. Not only is it historic, but it is also a place where lakhs of pilgrims from across the country and the world come for the last rites of their family members. For several years, however, this temple has been neglected. The canals where the "Bali" is offered to the gods have been in disarray, with no water flow and no work done on desilting. Today, a team comprising myself, the mayor, and the councillors of the Corporation came here to assure the worshippers and stakeholders that this temple will no longer remain without a protector. This is something we are committed to. We will ensure that such neglect is never repeated. This is a very holy place, and we expect it to be treated, developed, and maintained accordingly. That is our main intention..."

ANI

47,811 views • 3 months ago

The his guy@says he is from The President and no one can stop him. He is demolishing houses and homes in rural Zvimba. There is no mercy and there is no restraint. These villagers have nowhere to go with little kids on their backs. This government is something else

The his guy@says he is from The President and no one can stop him. He is demolishing houses and homes in rural Zvimba. There is no mercy and there is no restraint. These villagers have nowhere to go with little kids on their backs. This government is something else

Mdara Gee

19,664 views • 27 days ago

The OBR making clear what we have been saying all along. The government has set out NO plans as to where this “very very large pressure” is going to be cut. It is a “real risk” and with no plan the Education Secretary needs to be clear whether this is coming from SEND or schools.

The OBR making clear what we have been saying all along. The government has set out NO plans as to where this “very very large pressure” is going to be cut. It is a “real risk” and with no plan the Education Secretary needs to be clear whether this is coming from SEND or schools.

Laura Trott MP

46,423 views • 9 months ago

🚨 DR. PHIL: "I’ve sat with President Trump alone with no cameras, no people listening…. And I can tell you this is a man of DEEP faith and deep conviction… This is a man who wants this country to have a heart and have religion. GOD BLESS AMERICA for giving us President Donald Trump... It comes from the heart from him."

🚨 DR. PHIL: "I’ve sat with President Trump alone with no cameras, no people listening…. And I can tell you this is a man of DEEP faith and deep conviction… This is a man who wants this country to have a heart and have religion. GOD BLESS AMERICA for giving us President Donald Trump... It comes from the heart from him."

Nick Sortor

110,111 views • 1 year ago

Lindsey Graham says from Israel that he has received new intelligence claiming Iran is “up to no good” once again. He says Iran is rebuilding its nuclear weapons program and wants the United States and Israel to bomb Iran together. Graham also says the U.S., together with Israel, should bomb Lebanon to force it into the Abraham Accords.

Lindsey Graham says from Israel that he has received new intelligence claiming Iran is “up to no good” once again. He says Iran is rebuilding its nuclear weapons program and wants the United States and Israel to bomb Iran together. Graham also says the U.S., together with Israel, should bomb Lebanon to force it into the Abraham Accords.

Shadow of Ezra

583,798 views • 9 months ago

Barack Obama says aliens are real, he hasn’t seen them, and says he can confirm they are not being kept in Area 51 He says there is “no underground facility,” unless there is a grand conspiracy to hide it from the President of the United States.

Barack Obama says aliens are real, he hasn’t seen them, and says he can confirm they are not being kept in Area 51 He says there is “no underground facility,” unless there is a grand conspiracy to hide it from the President of the United States.

Shadow of Ezra

265,144 views • 7 months ago

🚨 “DROPPED FROM THE SKY?” - MYSTERY OBJECT APPEARS OVERNIGHT IN INDIANA PARK A woman says this strange monument “just appeared overnight.” She walks her dog there every day and swears it wasn’t there yesterday. It’s covered in mysterious carvings. She says it looks like it “either came up from the ground or dropped down from the sky.” And no one, not the park, not the city, is claiming it. Who put it there and why is no one talking about it?

🚨 “DROPPED FROM THE SKY?” - MYSTERY OBJECT APPEARS OVERNIGHT IN INDIANA PARK A woman says this strange monument “just appeared overnight.” She walks her dog there every day and swears it wasn’t there yesterday. It’s covered in mysterious carvings. She says it looks like it “either came up from the ground or dropped down from the sky.” And no one, not the park, not the city, is claiming it. Who put it there and why is no one talking about it?

HustleBitch

1,067,117 views • 10 months ago

The Canada Revenue Agency has started telling big companies like Deloitte, one of Canada’s largest accounting firms, that they cannot represent individual people. It says the same thing was said to me. It says this is a tactic to force people to deal directly with the CRA instead of having representation. It says this is illegal and should be challenged with lawsuits and charges. #IncomeTax #CorporateTax #RealEstate #CanadaRevenueAgency #CRA

The Canada Revenue Agency has started telling big companies like Deloitte, one of Canada’s largest accounting firms, that they cannot represent individual people. It says the same thing was said to me. It says this is a tactic to force people to deal directly with the CRA instead of having representation. It says this is illegal and should be challenged with lawsuits and charges. #IncomeTax #CorporateTax #RealEstate #CanadaRevenueAgency #CRA

Canada Tax Expert - I Crush Tax, And MAKE YOU RICH

23,266 views • 3 months ago

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On CM Yogi Adityanath's statement, AIMIM leader Waris Pathan says, "He is the Chief Minister of the state, yet he just comes out and says whatever he pleases... Now, he has simply come forward and claimed that certain Maulanas want the cow to be declared the National Animal... Everyone is talking about it, now we have started speaking about it too—and suddenly you seem to have a problem. Once the cow is declared the National Animal, no one will buy it, no one will slaughter it, no one will sell it, and no one will export it. The entire controversy would be resolved once and for all..." (03.06)

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On CM Yogi Adityanath's statement, AIMIM leader Waris Pathan says, "He is the Chief Minister of the state, yet he just comes out and says whatever he pleases... Now, he has simply come forward and claimed that certain Maulanas want the cow to be declared the National Animal... Everyone is talking about it, now we have started speaking about it too—and suddenly you seem to have a problem. Once the cow is declared the National Animal, no one will buy it, no one will slaughter it, no one will sell it, and no one will export it. The entire controversy would be resolved once and for all..." (03.06)

ANI

57,470 views • 3 months ago

A NOBEL WINNING PHYSICIST ARGUED THAT NO AI, NO MATTER HOW POWERFUL, WILL EVER TRULY UNDERSTAND A SINGLE THING IT SAYS. HIS REASON IS NOT COMPUTE OR DATA -- IT IS A MATH THEOREM FROM THE 1930s THAT SAYS SOME TRUTHS CAN BE SEEN BUT NEVER COMPUTED 81 minutes with Roger Penrose -- the Oxford physicist who won a Nobel for his work on black holes and general relativity. -> His claim: whatever consciousness is, it is not a computation. A machine following rules can imitate understanding, but never actually have it. He builds it on Gödel: a human can just "see" that certain statements are true, even though no algorithm can ever prove them. That seeing, he argues, is non-computational. If he is right, understanding is not something you scale into. You can stack a trillion parameters and still have zero awareness underneath. Which cuts straight through the AI moment. Everyone assumes bigger models will eventually "wake up". Penrose says that is a category error -- more computation is still just computation. You thought intelligence and understanding were the same thing. This is the conversation that pulls them apart. Save this. It is the sharpest case against the hype ↓

A NOBEL WINNING PHYSICIST ARGUED THAT NO AI, NO MATTER HOW POWERFUL, WILL EVER TRULY UNDERSTAND A SINGLE THING IT SAYS. HIS REASON IS NOT COMPUTE OR DATA -- IT IS A MATH THEOREM FROM THE 1930s THAT SAYS SOME TRUTHS CAN BE SEEN BUT NEVER COMPUTED 81 minutes with Roger Penrose -- the Oxford physicist who won a Nobel for his work on black holes and general relativity. -> His claim: whatever consciousness is, it is not a computation. A machine following rules can imitate understanding, but never actually have it. He builds it on Gödel: a human can just "see" that certain statements are true, even though no algorithm can ever prove them. That seeing, he argues, is non-computational. If he is right, understanding is not something you scale into. You can stack a trillion parameters and still have zero awareness underneath. Which cuts straight through the AI moment. Everyone assumes bigger models will eventually "wake up". Penrose says that is a category error -- more computation is still just computation. You thought intelligence and understanding were the same thing. This is the conversation that pulls them apart. Save this. It is the sharpest case against the hype ↓

slash1s

277,266 views • 2 months ago