Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Natural #ballbusting under a waterfall. Also on holiday the #slave needs to undergo #cbt #torturing. #nude #naked #nakedslave #skinnyslave #cocktorture #ballbashing #sub #subboi #submissive #gayslave #fetish #kinky #gaykink #gayfetish

Subslaf (6K) 🔜 Amsterdam Pride 🔜 Folsom Berlin

7,122 subscribers

12,978 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #ballbusting #slave #cbt #torturing #nude #naked #nakedslave #skinnyslave #cocktorture #ballbashing #sub #subboi #submissive #gayslave #fetish #kinky #gaykink #gayfetish

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

MP for Gomoa Central, Kwame Asare Obeng (The People's Person™) tells it all about the proposed artificial waterfall set to be developed under the Block A Project at his constituency. The MP together with engineers, and other technical experts are on a site tour of Yenku Forest to inspect the proposed artificial waterfall set to be developed under the Block A Project. The team is also assessing how the area can be designed to accommodate exciting attractions, including a zipline, airstrip, sky bicycle, and other adventure experiences. The inspection is part of the broader vision for the Gomoa Central Special Economic Zone (GCSEZ) — a flagship tourism initiative aimed at showcasing the area’s breathtaking natural beauty, unlocking its eco-tourism potential, and creating over 60,000 jobs.

MP for Gomoa Central, Kwame Asare Obeng (The People's Person™) tells it all about the proposed artificial waterfall set to be developed under the Block A Project at his constituency. The MP together with engineers, and other technical experts are on a site tour of Yenku Forest to inspect the proposed artificial waterfall set to be developed under the Block A Project. The team is also assessing how the area can be designed to accommodate exciting attractions, including a zipline, airstrip, sky bicycle, and other adventure experiences. The inspection is part of the broader vision for the Gomoa Central Special Economic Zone (GCSEZ) — a flagship tourism initiative aimed at showcasing the area’s breathtaking natural beauty, unlocking its eco-tourism potential, and creating over 60,000 jobs.

Zionfelix

26,718 次观看 • 1 个月前

“House prices across picturesque coastal and regional Australia could be trashed under an insurance crisis, the prudential regulator has warned. A stress test of Australia's insurers has sounded the alarm on homes exposed to natural catastrophes, with the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority declaring banks are likely to stay away from houses that can no longer secure insurance. 40,000 households could lose insurance cover each year over the coming 25 years under a disaster pathway. It would likely leave nearly 1 in 4 Australian homes, or nearly 2.4 million households, with unaffordable insurance pricing, according to APRA. These homes will struggle to attract insurance, with APRA warning this would then result in a decline in banks lending on them and, as a result, a fall in prices. Banks typically require a homebuyer to secure insurance on a property when lending on it.” •••••••••••••••••• It’s bad enough the government has made housing expensive for Australians, but the cost of insurance is also a nightmare that needs to be resolved. The only way to solve this problem is to bring back a government insurance office that will eliminate the cost of reinsurance paid offshore. This will help lower the cost of insurance by up to 50%. People First Party is the only party that has restoring a National Government Insurance Office as a policy. If you would like to help us promote this policy please sign up today at

“House prices across picturesque coastal and regional Australia could be trashed under an insurance crisis, the prudential regulator has warned. A stress test of Australia's insurers has sounded the alarm on homes exposed to natural catastrophes, with the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority declaring banks are likely to stay away from houses that can no longer secure insurance. 40,000 households could lose insurance cover each year over the coming 25 years under a disaster pathway. It would likely leave nearly 1 in 4 Australian homes, or nearly 2.4 million households, with unaffordable insurance pricing, according to APRA. These homes will struggle to attract insurance, with APRA warning this would then result in a decline in banks lending on them and, as a result, a fall in prices. Banks typically require a homebuyer to secure insurance on a property when lending on it.” •••••••••••••••••• It’s bad enough the government has made housing expensive for Australians, but the cost of insurance is also a nightmare that needs to be resolved. The only way to solve this problem is to bring back a government insurance office that will eliminate the cost of reinsurance paid offshore. This will help lower the cost of insurance by up to 50%. People First Party is the only party that has restoring a National Government Insurance Office as a policy. If you would like to help us promote this policy please sign up today at

Gerard Rennick

55,712 次观看 • 4 个月前

🇺🇸 BELOW No proszę, klęczysz jak grzeczny piesek - z daniną gotową, jakbyś całe życie na ten moment czekał. Wąchaj sobie moje spocone stópki, popatrz na tyłeczek i pomarz… bo tyle właśnie ci wolno - patrzeć i dziękować losowi, że w ogóle możesz. *** Well, well… there you are on your knees like a good little puppy - tribute ready, like you've been waiting your whole life for this. Go ahead, sniff my sweaty feet, admire the view of my ass, and keep dreaming… because that’s all you get – to watch and be grateful you even can. findom femdom paypig whalesub walletdrain humanatm finsub footfetish footworship feetfetish humiliation betaloser goddess domination domme Feet RT PROMO 💯K (ROAD TO 200K!) #FootParadise RT Group Slave Dominic 🇨🇦 dommesRt RT_Feet_slave RT FINDOM PROMO RT Promo Ebony Supremacy Owned Sub by Goddess @stepsxo BRUNO THE RT SUB LiveLifeFeet RT Page NUDE & FINDOM & FETISH 3.7K RT Findom 9.4K Empregadinho da Boss FemDom Promo Puppy Alex 🐶 findom RT 🔄 Howard Embleton Biznesmenel Findom PROMO FinDomme curious TPE RT slave and exposing timewasters Polski Findom 👑 king of toes Ugur Can FINDOM/FEET RT Footsie Retweet Feet 14K Thetoesfinder Foot Fetish Only Solesshoutouts007 15k 🦶

Sensitive content

🇺🇸 BELOW No proszę, klęczysz jak grzeczny piesek - z daniną gotową, jakbyś całe życie na ten moment czekał. Wąchaj sobie moje spocone stópki, popatrz na tyłeczek i pomarz… bo tyle właśnie ci wolno - patrzeć i dziękować losowi, że w ogóle możesz. *** Well, well… there you are on your knees like a good little puppy - tribute ready, like you've been waiting your whole life for this. Go ahead, sniff my sweaty feet, admire the view of my ass, and keep dreaming… because that’s all you get – to watch and be grateful you even can. findom femdom paypig whalesub walletdrain humanatm finsub footfetish footworship feetfetish humiliation betaloser goddess domination domme Feet RT PROMO 💯K (ROAD TO 200K!) #FootParadise RT Group Slave Dominic 🇨🇦 dommesRt RT_Feet_slave RT FINDOM PROMO RT Promo Ebony Supremacy Owned Sub by Goddess @stepsxo BRUNO THE RT SUB LiveLifeFeet RT Page NUDE & FINDOM & FETISH 3.7K RT Findom 9.4K Empregadinho da Boss FemDom Promo Puppy Alex 🐶 findom RT 🔄 Howard Embleton Biznesmenel Findom PROMO FinDomme curious TPE RT slave and exposing timewasters Polski Findom 👑 king of toes Ugur Can FINDOM/FEET RT Footsie Retweet Feet 14K Thetoesfinder Foot Fetish Only Solesshoutouts007 15k 🦶

GoddessOrtera

25,369 次观看 • 1 年前

In Jacob Rees-Mogg’s desperation during the Oxford Islam debate, he also came up with this bit of loony argument, praising Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406) as a great Islamic political theorist we ought to admire in the West today. Sir Jacob is a fan of Ibn Khaldun’s writings on taxation. But what does he think of the rest of political thought? Unlike some contemporary scholars who argued Jihad should only be defensive, Ibn Khaldun explicitly stated that Islam has a unique divine obligation to aggressively subjugate other nations. He wrote: “In the Islamic community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and the obligation to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force.” He contrasted Islam with Christianity, arguing that Christians were not commanded to seek global political dominion, whereas Muslims were. He fiercely held that Muslims were intrinsically culturally and morally superior to all non-Muslims simply by virtue of possessing the Islamic faith and legal code. He also argued that an oppressive, tyrannical, and unjust Muslim ruler was vastly preferable to even a single day of civil unrest or rebellion, and that citizens have an absolute religious duty to unconditionally submit to state authority, even if the ruler is actively stealing their property or acting cruelly. In his foundational work, The Muqaddimah, he also explains his pseudo-scientific views on sub-Saharan Africans, explicitly writing that people living in the extreme hot climates of sub-Saharan Africa were “closer to dumb animals than to rational beings” and alleged that they lived in caves and engaged in cannibalism. He used these prejudices to justify the Arab slave trade, writing: “Therefore, the Negro nations are, as a rule, submissive to slavery, because Negroes have little that is essentially human and possess attributes that are quite similar to those of dumb animals. He also claimed that Black people were characterized by universal “stupidity, levity, excitability, and great emotionalism,” attributing this to the “hot air” of their geographic zone. His views on Islamic political supremacy were uncompromising, and he openly argued that a religious theocracy (Khilafah) was the only legitimate form of governance. He explicitly stated that purely secular political systems based on human reason are fundamentally corrupt and sinful because they prioritise worldly greed over divine law. He even had zero tolerance for heterodoxy within the Muslim world, railing against Shia Muslims, and aggressively condemned and sought to ban the works of ecstatic or philosophical Sufi mystics (such as Ibn Arabi). So, are you embarrassed of this speech yet, Jacob Rees-Mogg?

In Jacob Rees-Mogg’s desperation during the Oxford Islam debate, he also came up with this bit of loony argument, praising Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406) as a great Islamic political theorist we ought to admire in the West today. Sir Jacob is a fan of Ibn Khaldun’s writings on taxation. But what does he think of the rest of political thought? Unlike some contemporary scholars who argued Jihad should only be defensive, Ibn Khaldun explicitly stated that Islam has a unique divine obligation to aggressively subjugate other nations. He wrote: “In the Islamic community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and the obligation to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force.” He contrasted Islam with Christianity, arguing that Christians were not commanded to seek global political dominion, whereas Muslims were. He fiercely held that Muslims were intrinsically culturally and morally superior to all non-Muslims simply by virtue of possessing the Islamic faith and legal code. He also argued that an oppressive, tyrannical, and unjust Muslim ruler was vastly preferable to even a single day of civil unrest or rebellion, and that citizens have an absolute religious duty to unconditionally submit to state authority, even if the ruler is actively stealing their property or acting cruelly. In his foundational work, The Muqaddimah, he also explains his pseudo-scientific views on sub-Saharan Africans, explicitly writing that people living in the extreme hot climates of sub-Saharan Africa were “closer to dumb animals than to rational beings” and alleged that they lived in caves and engaged in cannibalism. He used these prejudices to justify the Arab slave trade, writing: “Therefore, the Negro nations are, as a rule, submissive to slavery, because Negroes have little that is essentially human and possess attributes that are quite similar to those of dumb animals. He also claimed that Black people were characterized by universal “stupidity, levity, excitability, and great emotionalism,” attributing this to the “hot air” of their geographic zone. His views on Islamic political supremacy were uncompromising, and he openly argued that a religious theocracy (Khilafah) was the only legitimate form of governance. He explicitly stated that purely secular political systems based on human reason are fundamentally corrupt and sinful because they prioritise worldly greed over divine law. He even had zero tolerance for heterodoxy within the Muslim world, railing against Shia Muslims, and aggressively condemned and sought to ban the works of ecstatic or philosophical Sufi mystics (such as Ibn Arabi). So, are you embarrassed of this speech yet, Jacob Rees-Mogg?

Jonathan Sacerdoti

88,882 次观看 • 13 天前

🔥🔥🔥 The recent OCC statement is financial history in the making! What’s written there validates so much of what we’ve been analysing about Stronghold, and even about networks like Stellar and Ripple. For the first time, the US regulator states plainly, banks can hold crypto on their balance sheet, pay network fees, and operate directly on blockchains as a normal part of banking activity. I’m not sure everyone fully grasps the scale of this 😅 Banks not only can, they MUST be connected to different ledgers whenever those networks form part of permissible banking activities. The regulator describes DLTs as “new ways of conducting the very old business of banking”, and that says everything. It means blockchains are no longer a technological experiment; they’re being treated as natural extensions of the financial system. The document goes even further by stating that a bank may be unable to perform certain functions if it lacks the capacity to operate on these networks. If the payment, settlement, swap, or record is happening on a specific ledger, the bank needs to be there and it needs to operate using the native token, because that’s how fees are paid, transactions are validated, and consensus is reached. For the OCC, this is simply part of how a modern bank should function. And because each ledger works under its own rules — Ethereum with gas, Stellar with path payments, Ripple with ODL — the OCC explicitly acknowledges that banks will need to hold small amounts of multiple crypto-assets whenever this supports permitted activities. To test platforms, settle movements, reconcile internal wallets, execute client instructions… all of it requires presence on the networks and tokens to operate. This vision opens the door to something far bigger, a financial system where banks are connected to several DLTs simultaneously, each one serving a different purpose. Liquidity, messaging, FX, settlement. And if banks need to be on these networks, they also need the layers that link them together, translate data, maintain compliance, and ensure all of this can coexist with traditional standards. This is where the entire ecosystem of utility tokens and interoperable networks takes on renewed importance. 🔥 HUUUGE! 🔥 🧠 Know what you hold! $SHx $XLM $XRP #DigitalAssets #ISO20022 #Crypto #RWA

🔥🔥🔥 The recent OCC statement is financial history in the making! What’s written there validates so much of what we’ve been analysing about Stronghold, and even about networks like Stellar and Ripple. For the first time, the US regulator states plainly, banks can hold crypto on their balance sheet, pay network fees, and operate directly on blockchains as a normal part of banking activity. I’m not sure everyone fully grasps the scale of this 😅 Banks not only can, they MUST be connected to different ledgers whenever those networks form part of permissible banking activities. The regulator describes DLTs as “new ways of conducting the very old business of banking”, and that says everything. It means blockchains are no longer a technological experiment; they’re being treated as natural extensions of the financial system. The document goes even further by stating that a bank may be unable to perform certain functions if it lacks the capacity to operate on these networks. If the payment, settlement, swap, or record is happening on a specific ledger, the bank needs to be there and it needs to operate using the native token, because that’s how fees are paid, transactions are validated, and consensus is reached. For the OCC, this is simply part of how a modern bank should function. And because each ledger works under its own rules — Ethereum with gas, Stellar with path payments, Ripple with ODL — the OCC explicitly acknowledges that banks will need to hold small amounts of multiple crypto-assets whenever this supports permitted activities. To test platforms, settle movements, reconcile internal wallets, execute client instructions… all of it requires presence on the networks and tokens to operate. This vision opens the door to something far bigger, a financial system where banks are connected to several DLTs simultaneously, each one serving a different purpose. Liquidity, messaging, FX, settlement. And if banks need to be on these networks, they also need the layers that link them together, translate data, maintain compliance, and ensure all of this can coexist with traditional standards. This is where the entire ecosystem of utility tokens and interoperable networks takes on renewed importance. 🔥 HUUUGE! 🔥 🧠 Know what you hold! $SHx $XLM $XRP #DigitalAssets #ISO20022 #Crypto #RWA

StrongSHx

28,507 次观看 • 8 个月前

First Presbyterian Church, Augusta (PCA), has a whole lot of women’s shepherds. They specify: “Women’s Shepherds are commissioned under the authority of BCO 9-7.” Here is what BCO 9-7 says: "It is often expedient that the Session of a church should select and appoint godly men and women of the congregation to assist the deacons in caring for the sick, the widows, the orphans, the prisoners, and others who may be in any distress or need. These assistants to the deacons are not officers of the church (BCO 7-2) and, as such, are not subjects for ordination (BCO 17)." But based on their own description, it doesn’t seem that First Pres’s women’s shepherds exist primarily to assist the deacons in works of mercy. They don’t list them under their mercy ministry, alongside the deacons, as “deaconesses” or “deacon assistants.” Instead, they list them under shepherding in a separate sub-header. At First Pres, shepherds function more like lay leaders who oversee a segment of the congregation called parishes. Listen to how they describe their work: "In addition, we have a team of Women’s Shepherds who are non-ordained members of our care team. They also have a flock and work with the elders and deacons to come alongside women in the church to encourage them, support them, help connect them with the church, and point them to the good news of Jesus. Our Women’s Shepherding program is small and growing. Currently, not every woman is assigned to a Women’s Shepherd; however, if you have a need, a Women’s Shepherd is available to assist you! All shepherds and Women’s Shepherds receive training in theology, crisis care, skilled listening, and peacemaking so that they can help shoulder the burden of life’s struggles. Their desire is to walk with our members, provide spiritual care and counsel, and connect you with other assistance as needed. A Care Group may be provided in certain situations. This is a small group of people gathered to address longer-term needs." This doesn’teven look like a straightforward application of BCO 9-7. Instead, it creates a non-ordained but commissioned group of women’s shepherds tasked with overseeing the spiritual (not merely practical) needs of the women. Functionally, men have their pastors, and women have their shepherds. It’s a slow drift toward female pastors for the whole congregation.

First Presbyterian Church, Augusta (PCA), has a whole lot of women’s shepherds. They specify: “Women’s Shepherds are commissioned under the authority of BCO 9-7.” Here is what BCO 9-7 says: "It is often expedient that the Session of a church should select and appoint godly men and women of the congregation to assist the deacons in caring for the sick, the widows, the orphans, the prisoners, and others who may be in any distress or need. These assistants to the deacons are not officers of the church (BCO 7-2) and, as such, are not subjects for ordination (BCO 17)." But based on their own description, it doesn’t seem that First Pres’s women’s shepherds exist primarily to assist the deacons in works of mercy. They don’t list them under their mercy ministry, alongside the deacons, as “deaconesses” or “deacon assistants.” Instead, they list them under shepherding in a separate sub-header. At First Pres, shepherds function more like lay leaders who oversee a segment of the congregation called parishes. Listen to how they describe their work: "In addition, we have a team of Women’s Shepherds who are non-ordained members of our care team. They also have a flock and work with the elders and deacons to come alongside women in the church to encourage them, support them, help connect them with the church, and point them to the good news of Jesus. Our Women’s Shepherding program is small and growing. Currently, not every woman is assigned to a Women’s Shepherd; however, if you have a need, a Women’s Shepherd is available to assist you! All shepherds and Women’s Shepherds receive training in theology, crisis care, skilled listening, and peacemaking so that they can help shoulder the burden of life’s struggles. Their desire is to walk with our members, provide spiritual care and counsel, and connect you with other assistance as needed. A Care Group may be provided in certain situations. This is a small group of people gathered to address longer-term needs." This doesn’teven look like a straightforward application of BCO 9-7. Instead, it creates a non-ordained but commissioned group of women’s shepherds tasked with overseeing the spiritual (not merely practical) needs of the women. Functionally, men have their pastors, and women have their shepherds. It’s a slow drift toward female pastors for the whole congregation.

Michael Foster

13,687 次观看 • 10 个月前

Today at Yoast we’re shipping something I've actually wanted to see on the web for some time (even before working at Yoast) and am now honored to be part of the team to bring this to the masses... Built in collaboration with the Open Source and NLWeb team at Microsoft lead by R.V.Guha (co-creator of RSS, RDF and other web standards) - we're introducing the Schema Aggregation feature: a "schemamap" endpoint that outputs your site's entire structured data map in one place. Under the hood, we now provide a standardised, deduplicated map of your entities via a single endpoint. An agent no longer needs to crawl all individual pages to understand its meaning but can now ingest an entire entity map with ease. A few details to note about the endpoint: - It's is cacheable with sub‑100ms responses - It respects existing privacy and indexing settings - It aggregates all indexable content without navigation noise - It merges duplicate entities so your "Author X" or "Article Y" exist as a single node instead of being re‑discovered on every URL. - If you're using one of our paid plugins that extends schema even more (such as Yoast WooCommerce SEO adds product schema) this will be populated within the endpoint too - If you already extend Yoast’s Schema API, or use partners like events or recipe plugins, their entities are pulled into the same map automatically. For me, this is one of the first major ways the agentic web can ingest a site at scale, and with much more efficiency and context. It has also been so much fun to work with this alongside the team at Yoast, particularly the genius mind of Alain Schlesser. Lastly, we have also launched a schema visualisation tool to view how everything is output. You can enable this feature today with the free version of Yoast SEO.

Today at Yoast we’re shipping something I've actually wanted to see on the web for some time (even before working at Yoast) and am now honored to be part of the team to bring this to the masses... Built in collaboration with the Open Source and NLWeb team at Microsoft lead by R.V.Guha (co-creator of RSS, RDF and other web standards) - we're introducing the Schema Aggregation feature: a "schemamap" endpoint that outputs your site's entire structured data map in one place. Under the hood, we now provide a standardised, deduplicated map of your entities via a single endpoint. An agent no longer needs to crawl all individual pages to understand its meaning but can now ingest an entire entity map with ease. A few details to note about the endpoint: - It's is cacheable with sub‑100ms responses - It respects existing privacy and indexing settings - It aggregates all indexable content without navigation noise - It merges duplicate entities so your "Author X" or "Article Y" exist as a single node instead of being re‑discovered on every URL. - If you're using one of our paid plugins that extends schema even more (such as Yoast WooCommerce SEO adds product schema) this will be populated within the endpoint too - If you already extend Yoast’s Schema API, or use partners like events or recipe plugins, their entities are pulled into the same map automatically. For me, this is one of the first major ways the agentic web can ingest a site at scale, and with much more efficiency and context. It has also been so much fun to work with this alongside the team at Yoast, particularly the genius mind of Alain Schlesser. Lastly, we have also launched a schema visualisation tool to view how everything is output. You can enable this feature today with the free version of Yoast SEO.

Alex Moss

15,372 次观看 • 5 个月前

Roman road Stepping Stones, prominent in cities like Pompeii, were ingenious solutions for urban life, allowing pedestrians to cross streets without stepping in rainwater, mud, and waste, acting as rudimentary crosswalks that also controlled cart traffic by forcing them to slow down, showcasing early Roman urban planning for cleanliness and safety. These large, raised stones, dating back to 2nd-1st Century BC, demonstrate how Romans managed frequent street flooding and refuse in cities lacking modern sewers, creating a functional system for both foot and wheeled traffic. With no advanced sewer systems, Roman streets were often filled with rainwater and waste; the stones kept feet clean and dry. Spaced to allow cart wheels to pass, they channeled vehicles and created designated pedestrian crossing zones, much like modern zebra crossings. Their widespread use reflects a practical approach to urban life, ensuring easier movement and managing environmental challenges. The stones in Pompeii provide tangible evidence of these daily life solutions, showcasing a clever adaptation to the environment.... Prior to the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 AD, and consequently being buried under volcanic ash, the ancient Roman city of Pompeii was a thriving place. The vibrant settlement played a critical role in trade; thus, its 15,000 inhabitants lived in impressively modern conditions for the era. When tourists visit the site today, they are able to see the preserved ruins of a well-planned city that accounted for its citizens' needs. This ancient innovation is particularly evident when looking at how roads were built in Pompeii. One of most noticeable features on the streets is the series of large raised stones placed in strategic locations. These prominent stepping stones acted as ancient crosswalks. Not only did they allow people to cross the street without touching the water and mud sitting on ground level, but they were also spaced wide enough so that carriage wheels could pass through without issue. Natural reflectors were also incorporated into some of the roads in the form of small white stones. These paler rocks were set among the larger slabs to help people find their way at night. The moon would reflect on the stones, creating enough light for people to be able to see. Drainage was also particularly important since most homes in Pompeii had no direct sewer connection. Refuse was washed into the street, making these stepping stones critical. Raised sidewalks with drainage also allowed people to move freely without putting their feet in sewage. The gaps between the stones were carefully designed to fit the width of chariot and cart wheels, forcing them to slow down and navigate carefully. These features highlight Roman ingenuity in balancing pedestrian needs, vehicle movement, and sanitation in their bustling cities. Innovations like these make Pompeii a fascinating place to visit and a wonderful example of ancient Roman urban planning. 🎥© sagalensfilms (IG) #archaeohistories

Roman road Stepping Stones, prominent in cities like Pompeii, were ingenious solutions for urban life, allowing pedestrians to cross streets without stepping in rainwater, mud, and waste, acting as rudimentary crosswalks that also controlled cart traffic by forcing them to slow down, showcasing early Roman urban planning for cleanliness and safety. These large, raised stones, dating back to 2nd-1st Century BC, demonstrate how Romans managed frequent street flooding and refuse in cities lacking modern sewers, creating a functional system for both foot and wheeled traffic. With no advanced sewer systems, Roman streets were often filled with rainwater and waste; the stones kept feet clean and dry. Spaced to allow cart wheels to pass, they channeled vehicles and created designated pedestrian crossing zones, much like modern zebra crossings. Their widespread use reflects a practical approach to urban life, ensuring easier movement and managing environmental challenges. The stones in Pompeii provide tangible evidence of these daily life solutions, showcasing a clever adaptation to the environment.... Prior to the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 AD, and consequently being buried under volcanic ash, the ancient Roman city of Pompeii was a thriving place. The vibrant settlement played a critical role in trade; thus, its 15,000 inhabitants lived in impressively modern conditions for the era. When tourists visit the site today, they are able to see the preserved ruins of a well-planned city that accounted for its citizens' needs. This ancient innovation is particularly evident when looking at how roads were built in Pompeii. One of most noticeable features on the streets is the series of large raised stones placed in strategic locations. These prominent stepping stones acted as ancient crosswalks. Not only did they allow people to cross the street without touching the water and mud sitting on ground level, but they were also spaced wide enough so that carriage wheels could pass through without issue. Natural reflectors were also incorporated into some of the roads in the form of small white stones. These paler rocks were set among the larger slabs to help people find their way at night. The moon would reflect on the stones, creating enough light for people to be able to see. Drainage was also particularly important since most homes in Pompeii had no direct sewer connection. Refuse was washed into the street, making these stepping stones critical. Raised sidewalks with drainage also allowed people to move freely without putting their feet in sewage. The gaps between the stones were carefully designed to fit the width of chariot and cart wheels, forcing them to slow down and navigate carefully. These features highlight Roman ingenuity in balancing pedestrian needs, vehicle movement, and sanitation in their bustling cities. Innovations like these make Pompeii a fascinating place to visit and a wonderful example of ancient Roman urban planning. 🎥© sagalensfilms (IG) #archaeohistories

Archaeo - Histories

863,706 次观看 • 7 个月前

Another Chhangur Baba Gang in UP? Yet again, a case involving Hindu women, minors, and Islamists has come to light from Lucknow. Two brave victims have come forward, leading to three FIRs and rescue of 17 girls. The modus operandi is same: meeting girls online, offering them jobs or trapping them in fake love affairs, then taking them to rooms and hotels, intoxicating them, recording nude clips, and beginning the blackmail. One of the victims came to Lucknow preparing for the UP Police exam. She met one Rahul, who promised her a job. He took her to a hotel, intoxicated her, raped her, recorded a video, and then forced her to repeat it with others. The other victim, a minor from Delhi, found a number on the internet regarding a job opportunity. She was then taken to Ajmer, from there to Lucknow, and then to the same spa as the first victim. Both had been converted to Islam, abandoned by their families, and exploited by Rahul and his gang, who is actually Kamru Jamal. The others in the gang are Amir, Javed, Kamar, and others. The third FIR was also registered by the family of a minor Dalit girl, alleging she has been kidnapped by one Amaan Khan, Ameeran, and Sahiba. Activists claim that in the last three days, as many as 17 girls have been rescued, with only one Muslim and 16 Hindus. Allegations have also been leveled against the UP Police, claiming that they are registering cases under less heinous sections. The link with Ajmer raises another suspicion about what has been cooking. When we at Organiser Weekly went there in April last year, a gang was operational which trapped teen girls, took them to cafes, and recorded videos to blackmail them, following the same modus operandi as in Ajmer 1992. This is organised crime. Islamists get money for doing this; it has been said again and again and needs deeper investigation. Kindly help UP POLICE, Yogi Adityanath Office. Detailed report in next tweet.

Another Chhangur Baba Gang in UP? Yet again, a case involving Hindu women, minors, and Islamists has come to light from Lucknow. Two brave victims have come forward, leading to three FIRs and rescue of 17 girls. The modus operandi is same: meeting girls online, offering them jobs or trapping them in fake love affairs, then taking them to rooms and hotels, intoxicating them, recording nude clips, and beginning the blackmail. One of the victims came to Lucknow preparing for the UP Police exam. She met one Rahul, who promised her a job. He took her to a hotel, intoxicated her, raped her, recorded a video, and then forced her to repeat it with others. The other victim, a minor from Delhi, found a number on the internet regarding a job opportunity. She was then taken to Ajmer, from there to Lucknow, and then to the same spa as the first victim. Both had been converted to Islam, abandoned by their families, and exploited by Rahul and his gang, who is actually Kamru Jamal. The others in the gang are Amir, Javed, Kamar, and others. The third FIR was also registered by the family of a minor Dalit girl, alleging she has been kidnapped by one Amaan Khan, Ameeran, and Sahiba. Activists claim that in the last three days, as many as 17 girls have been rescued, with only one Muslim and 16 Hindus. Allegations have also been leveled against the UP Police, claiming that they are registering cases under less heinous sections. The link with Ajmer raises another suspicion about what has been cooking. When we at Organiser Weekly went there in April last year, a gang was operational which trapped teen girls, took them to cafes, and recorded videos to blackmail them, following the same modus operandi as in Ajmer 1992. This is organised crime. Islamists get money for doing this; it has been said again and again and needs deeper investigation. Kindly help UP POLICE, Yogi Adityanath Office. Detailed report in next tweet.

Subhi Vishwakarma

14,208 次观看 • 6 个月前

Many of the children of Daraya have never seen a space like this. They were born into war, into the barren and blown out landscape that the Assad regime & its Russian backers turned the Damascus suburb Daraya and huge swaths of Syria into. For years this area was under siege, its population starved, bombed, and forcibly displaced. The kids were timid at first, the soft flooring, the different toys and activities all something of a novelty, such a contrast to their world outside. They were so polite, repeatedly asking “Can I play with this? Is this all for us?” This space will have playtime, a reading corner, all sorts of fun activities and also many related to the children’s mental health. We will conduct group and one on one sessions for those who need it. One of the jarring things I heard was that in this area alone some 15,000 men were disappeared by the regime. We will also be conducting activities and mental health sessions for the mothers. Women are carrying the burden of both mother and father. Children constantly ask “where is Daddy?” Mothers used to say “Daddy is with the regime”. But they can’t say that anymore, the kids are responding “the regime is gone, why isn’t Daddy home”. Mothers don’t know how to explain that Daddy disappeared, that he’s either in a yet to be discovered mass grave or one of the corpses that was dug up, that he was just a number for the Assad regime. The traumas across this country are deep, raw wounds. In Daraya, we are also in the process of setting up a mobile primary care medical van. This is just the start of our work in Syria. We travelled to other areas pinpointing where we need to expand to, what sort of programs are needed. There are so many kids who never got the medical treatment they need to physically recover from their war injuries or whose parents can’t afford the cost. There’s a lot of work to be done in the mental health and access to education space, needs ranging from hygiene to nutrition. We’re trying to raise as much as we can this holiday season, so please donate here: And if you can’t please please do share.

Many of the children of Daraya have never seen a space like this. They were born into war, into the barren and blown out landscape that the Assad regime & its Russian backers turned the Damascus suburb Daraya and huge swaths of Syria into. For years this area was under siege, its population starved, bombed, and forcibly displaced. The kids were timid at first, the soft flooring, the different toys and activities all something of a novelty, such a contrast to their world outside. They were so polite, repeatedly asking “Can I play with this? Is this all for us?” This space will have playtime, a reading corner, all sorts of fun activities and also many related to the children’s mental health. We will conduct group and one on one sessions for those who need it. One of the jarring things I heard was that in this area alone some 15,000 men were disappeared by the regime. We will also be conducting activities and mental health sessions for the mothers. Women are carrying the burden of both mother and father. Children constantly ask “where is Daddy?” Mothers used to say “Daddy is with the regime”. But they can’t say that anymore, the kids are responding “the regime is gone, why isn’t Daddy home”. Mothers don’t know how to explain that Daddy disappeared, that he’s either in a yet to be discovered mass grave or one of the corpses that was dug up, that he was just a number for the Assad regime. The traumas across this country are deep, raw wounds. In Daraya, we are also in the process of setting up a mobile primary care medical van. This is just the start of our work in Syria. We travelled to other areas pinpointing where we need to expand to, what sort of programs are needed. There are so many kids who never got the medical treatment they need to physically recover from their war injuries or whose parents can’t afford the cost. There’s a lot of work to be done in the mental health and access to education space, needs ranging from hygiene to nutrition. We’re trying to raise as much as we can this holiday season, so please donate here: And if you can’t please please do share.

Arwa Damon

65,665 次观看 • 1 年前

More Shocking Fake News, Disinformation, and Leftist Propaganda from the ABC Once again, the ABC has deceived Australians, airing the totally unchallenged false claim that net immigration of around 300,000 people creates a "surplus" of housing. This is classic dog-whistling to leftist activists who desperately want to deny the obvious link between excessive immigration and Australia’s housing crisis. The ABC’s false claim rests on the flawed premise that Australia is building 175,000 "new" homes per year. At an average occupancy of 2.4 people per home, this supposedly covers the needs of 300,000 net migrants (requiring only ~125,000 homes), leaving a supposed "surplus" of housing enabling migration rates to be increased, Such reporting is fundamentally dishonest. 🟠FIRST, it ignores the fact that we must also provide new housing for the natural population growth—not just new migrants. According to the latest ABS figures for the year ending September 2024 (or closest available), net overseas migration was approximately 311,000, while natural increase added another 112,600 people. That totals 423,600 additional people needing housing. At 2.4 people per dwelling, Australia required around 176,500 new homes just to keep pace—meaning the claimed "surplus" (based in building 175,000 "new" homes) is at best an illusion. 🟠SECOND using the ABS’s 175,000 "new" homes figure is grossly misleading because this number includes knock-down rebuilds (KDRs) that do NOT increase overall housing supply. ABS data shows that between July 2019 and June 2025, 19.2% of "new" dwellings approved were knock-down rebuilds that simply replaced existing housing. Applying that rate, the real net addition to housing stock was only about 141,400 homes—well short of the 176,500 needed. This leaves a shortfall of roughly 35,000 homes in that year alone. In equivalent terms, that’s like an excess migration intake of around 84,000 people (before even addressing the backlog from previous years of under-supply). 🟠Yet the ABC pushed the exact opposite of the truth, deceiving viewers into believing there was a housing surplus. No doubt many of their gullible leftist audience clapped along like trained seals. The ABC’s persistent disinformation on migration and housing is actively preventing Australians from having an informed national debate. By peddling these half-truths and omissions, they shield failed policies from scrutiny and exacerbate the very crisis they pretend to report on. 🟠The ABC needs to be defunded. Taxpayers should not be forced to subsidise this kind of biased, misleading journalism.

More Shocking Fake News, Disinformation, and Leftist Propaganda from the ABC Once again, the ABC has deceived Australians, airing the totally unchallenged false claim that net immigration of around 300,000 people creates a "surplus" of housing. This is classic dog-whistling to leftist activists who desperately want to deny the obvious link between excessive immigration and Australia’s housing crisis. The ABC’s false claim rests on the flawed premise that Australia is building 175,000 "new" homes per year. At an average occupancy of 2.4 people per home, this supposedly covers the needs of 300,000 net migrants (requiring only ~125,000 homes), leaving a supposed "surplus" of housing enabling migration rates to be increased, Such reporting is fundamentally dishonest. 🟠FIRST, it ignores the fact that we must also provide new housing for the natural population growth—not just new migrants. According to the latest ABS figures for the year ending September 2024 (or closest available), net overseas migration was approximately 311,000, while natural increase added another 112,600 people. That totals 423,600 additional people needing housing. At 2.4 people per dwelling, Australia required around 176,500 new homes just to keep pace—meaning the claimed "surplus" (based in building 175,000 "new" homes) is at best an illusion. 🟠SECOND using the ABS’s 175,000 "new" homes figure is grossly misleading because this number includes knock-down rebuilds (KDRs) that do NOT increase overall housing supply. ABS data shows that between July 2019 and June 2025, 19.2% of "new" dwellings approved were knock-down rebuilds that simply replaced existing housing. Applying that rate, the real net addition to housing stock was only about 141,400 homes—well short of the 176,500 needed. This leaves a shortfall of roughly 35,000 homes in that year alone. In equivalent terms, that’s like an excess migration intake of around 84,000 people (before even addressing the backlog from previous years of under-supply). 🟠Yet the ABC pushed the exact opposite of the truth, deceiving viewers into believing there was a housing surplus. No doubt many of their gullible leftist audience clapped along like trained seals. The ABC’s persistent disinformation on migration and housing is actively preventing Australians from having an informed national debate. By peddling these half-truths and omissions, they shield failed policies from scrutiny and exacerbate the very crisis they pretend to report on. 🟠The ABC needs to be defunded. Taxpayers should not be forced to subsidise this kind of biased, misleading journalism.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

22,022 次观看 • 2 个月前

BREAKING NEWS🚨🚨🚨: Michael Proctor will be forced to appear for his deposition with Alan Jackson and Karen Read, however Judge Gildea will delay his final ruling until 4pm ET today in order to supplement Proctor's "insufficient" arguments to the court regarding a protective order to delay that deposition. Another hearing will happen today at 4:15PM et TODAY (Monday, June 8th, 2026, via Zoom). Proctor's deposition, for now, is stayed for 24 hours. "For this case to proceed efficiently, and for our system of justice to work, certain basic things need to happen," Judge Gildea began during his ruling. "A subpoena needs to mean something, a lawyer's agreement needs to have some meaning, lawyers need to communicate with their clients, clients need to keep their attorneys informed, and when given an opportunity to provide support for a party's request, that party needs to avail themselves of the opportunity," Judge continued (scolding Proctor's counsel for failing to provide a sufficient record to justify a delay in Proctor's deposition, despite an order by the court on Friday for such information to be filed). Based on the record before me, there is insufficient information to support a delay in the deposition going forward, however, given the claims made in the filings over the weekend, I will delay making a final decision on the motion until 4PM today, to give Mr. Proctor's counsel to supplement the record before me," Judge Gildea concluded. The Michael Proctor and Sean Goode "Proctorgate" files have caused serious damage, and Karen Read stands tall. Read more about those shocking, and abhorrent, messages here (also discussed by Judge Gildea during today's hearing) wherein Proctor (a former State Trooper who investigated Karen Read for the death of John O'Keefe) and former Canton cop Sean Goode talked about everything from how Anne Frank was a "liar" to how Proctor felt Goode should "let them die" after Proctor noticed a car accident victim was, in Proctor's words, a "ni**er". Proctor also discussed "planting cocaine" on someone and, shockingly, said "America sucks" because the country stopped the Third Reich during World War II (while, at the same time, saying "Jews in Sharon" should be "put in a concentration camp") at this link: To this day, the death of John O'Keefe remains unsolved. Proctor is just one of multiple witnesses involving in the twice-failed prosecution of Karen for John's death who Read's lawyers have told Judge Gildea are attempting to avoid or delay depositions (including Colin Albert, Jennifer McCabe, Brian Higgins, Matt McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert). Last week, on Wednesday, I reported: In a shocking hearing before Judge Mark Gildea on Wednesday, Karen Read's lawyers announced that they have been forced to file a motion to compel a deposition of Colin Albert. Further, Karen's lawyers will be filing motions to compel depositions of Jennifer McCabe, Brian Higgins, Matt McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert, as those parties are seeking to delay their depositions until late July, or early August, of 2026. "Colin Albert refused to appear or produce documents...his attorney said he is unavailable and then, suddenly, said Colin would only be available for seven more days and, then, [Colin] would be gone for the entire discovery period," Karen's Lawyer, Aaron Rosenberg, told Judge Gildea during Wednesday's hearing. In that regard, here is the full recording of today's John O'Keefe and Karen Read hearing in Plymouth Superior Court. This case is one of three ongoing civil lawsuits (one in federal court and two in Plymouth District Court in front of Judge Gildea) that stem from the, yet-unsolved, murder of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. To this day, it is unclear if anyone has found the Mystery Man who is suspected of being at the center of potential upcoming investigations by state and federal authorities as to John's death. Read more about that Mystery Man here - Judge Gildea began Wednesday's hearing by asking counsel for all parties how many depositions have been conducted in the case. "I am hoping at least four have been taken," said Judge Gildea. The O'Keefe lawyer told Judge Gildea that only three depositions have taken place. Judge then asked the O'Keefe lawyer what depositions need to still take place for the plaintiffs. "There are 12," the O'Keefe lawyer responded, including Paul Markowski. The O'Keefe lawyers also need to change Karen's deposition until June 24th. The O'Keefe lawyers changed Karen's deposition from July to June 19th, but multiple lawyer's will not be working on that day as that day is a federal holiday. Judge was not pleased that so few depositions have taken place, but Judge understood that June 19th is a federal holiday and, in turn, Karen's deposition will be held on June 24th, 2026. Karen's lawyers had proposed four other dates and Mr. Diller (the O'Keefe lawyer) picked a federal holiday, instead. "It is beyond belief to me the number of experienced lawyers involved in this case, the length the case has been pending...for however long it has been pending for all parties...that there are so few depositions that have taken place...I don't need to hear all the details, and the nitpicking, what I need to hear is, going forward, how you all are going to get the discovery done," Judge Gildea said to all lawyers. Things, at that point, got quite intense, as Karen's lawyers then noted to Judge Gildea that they have six depositions currently scheduled for the following six witnesses; Brian and Nicole Albert, Matthew McCabe, Allie McCabe, Jennifer McCabe and Brian Higgins. However, the law firm for all of those people got back to Karen's lawyers last night, on June 2nd, 2026, at 9:45PM and said NONE of those witnesses could appear on the dates scheduled for their depositions and, for some reason, none of those witnesses are able to appear for depositions until late July of 2026 at the earliest. Stunningly, no reason was given for why those witnesses refused to appear for their depositions on the dates originally proposed by Karen's lawyers, Attorney Rosenberg told Judge Gildea. Those notices of depositions went out on May 5th, 2026, said Karen's lawyers, when Judge Gildea asked about that date (indicating Judge Gildea, already displeased with discovery and deposition delays in the years-old case, was not pleased to hear about witnesses, on their own accord, attempting to delay depositions by two more months). Karen's lawyers, picking up on Judge Gildea's frustration, then noted that they intend to file motions to compel those witnesses to appear for depositions as a result of the proposed delays. Also, during the hearing, it was announced that former Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor will be deposed by Karen Read's lawyers on Monday, June 8th, 2026, per a statement from Karen's lawyers in court on Wednesday. The O'Keefe lawyer, for their part, noted they intend to depose Aidan Kearney, Karen Read, Kaitlin Boudreau Read (Nathan Read's wife), Janet Read, Nathan Read, William Read, multiple witnesses from the bars (C.F. McCarthy's and The Waterfall), and an outstanding deposition that Karen's team needed to move last week. Judge Gildea then asked what, if anything, he could do to help the parties (other than moving quickly on motions before the court when submitted). Both parties said they will involve the court, in motion practice, as needed going forward. Judge then wanted to know what motions have been sent out under Rule 9(a). It was at that point that Karen's lawyers announced that she will be filing a motion to compel production of documents and the deposition of Colin Albert. "Colin Albert refused to appear or produce documents...his attorney said he is unavailable and then, suddenly, said Colin would only be available for seven more days and then [Colin] would be gone for the entire discovery period," Karen's Lawyer, Aaron Rosenberg, told Judge Mark Gildea during the hearing. Earlier, Karen also announced that she intends to file similar motions for Brian Higgins, Matt McCabe, Jen McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert, as those witnesses are attempting to avoid their depositions until late July or early August of 2026. The O'Keefe lawyer, for their part, told Judge Gildea they intend to serve a motion to compel regarding Aidan Kearney as a keeper of record (and, for some reason, Diller wants documents from Aidan's ongoing case in Norfolk Superior Court). "File a motion and we'll put it on for an expedited hearing," Judge Gildea said regarding that issue, and any other motions to compel the parties may want to file (including the motion regarding Colin Albert that has already been served, and should be in the docket in the next few weeks). When a motion is served under Rule 9(a), it is first given to the opposing party who then responds. Then, the moving party (the "movant") is able to file a sur-reply. Only at that point does the entire motion to compel get compiled as a so-called "Rule 9 (a) package" and, in turn, appear on the docket (with all filings related to a given motion showing up at the same time). It is unclear when the motions to compel the depositions of Brian Higgins, Jen McCabe, Matt McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert will be served and, eventually, docketed with the court. Penalties for third-parties who avoid discovery, or document production requests, can include court sanctions, compelled deposition dates, and adverse evidentiary rulings if a motion to compel is granted, yet further delays then occur. Judge Gildea told all of the lawyers present that he expects to dive deep into the issue of who was issued deposition notices in this case, who avoided those depositions, who delayed depositions and, in turn, what remedies the court will impose. "We served it Monday," the O'Keefe lawyer then said, as the hearing ended (indicating a number of motions to compel discovery, or depositions, may be heard over the coming weeks under the sweltering heat of Judge Gildea's virtual courtroom stare). More as I know it.

BREAKING NEWS🚨🚨🚨: Michael Proctor will be forced to appear for his deposition with Alan Jackson and Karen Read, however Judge Gildea will delay his final ruling until 4pm ET today in order to supplement Proctor's "insufficient" arguments to the court regarding a protective order to delay that deposition. Another hearing will happen today at 4:15PM et TODAY (Monday, June 8th, 2026, via Zoom). Proctor's deposition, for now, is stayed for 24 hours. "For this case to proceed efficiently, and for our system of justice to work, certain basic things need to happen," Judge Gildea began during his ruling. "A subpoena needs to mean something, a lawyer's agreement needs to have some meaning, lawyers need to communicate with their clients, clients need to keep their attorneys informed, and when given an opportunity to provide support for a party's request, that party needs to avail themselves of the opportunity," Judge continued (scolding Proctor's counsel for failing to provide a sufficient record to justify a delay in Proctor's deposition, despite an order by the court on Friday for such information to be filed). Based on the record before me, there is insufficient information to support a delay in the deposition going forward, however, given the claims made in the filings over the weekend, I will delay making a final decision on the motion until 4PM today, to give Mr. Proctor's counsel to supplement the record before me," Judge Gildea concluded. The Michael Proctor and Sean Goode "Proctorgate" files have caused serious damage, and Karen Read stands tall. Read more about those shocking, and abhorrent, messages here (also discussed by Judge Gildea during today's hearing) wherein Proctor (a former State Trooper who investigated Karen Read for the death of John O'Keefe) and former Canton cop Sean Goode talked about everything from how Anne Frank was a "liar" to how Proctor felt Goode should "let them die" after Proctor noticed a car accident victim was, in Proctor's words, a "ni**er". Proctor also discussed "planting cocaine" on someone and, shockingly, said "America sucks" because the country stopped the Third Reich during World War II (while, at the same time, saying "Jews in Sharon" should be "put in a concentration camp") at this link: To this day, the death of John O'Keefe remains unsolved. Proctor is just one of multiple witnesses involving in the twice-failed prosecution of Karen for John's death who Read's lawyers have told Judge Gildea are attempting to avoid or delay depositions (including Colin Albert, Jennifer McCabe, Brian Higgins, Matt McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert). Last week, on Wednesday, I reported: In a shocking hearing before Judge Mark Gildea on Wednesday, Karen Read's lawyers announced that they have been forced to file a motion to compel a deposition of Colin Albert. Further, Karen's lawyers will be filing motions to compel depositions of Jennifer McCabe, Brian Higgins, Matt McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert, as those parties are seeking to delay their depositions until late July, or early August, of 2026. "Colin Albert refused to appear or produce documents...his attorney said he is unavailable and then, suddenly, said Colin would only be available for seven more days and, then, [Colin] would be gone for the entire discovery period," Karen's Lawyer, Aaron Rosenberg, told Judge Gildea during Wednesday's hearing. In that regard, here is the full recording of today's John O'Keefe and Karen Read hearing in Plymouth Superior Court. This case is one of three ongoing civil lawsuits (one in federal court and two in Plymouth District Court in front of Judge Gildea) that stem from the, yet-unsolved, murder of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. To this day, it is unclear if anyone has found the Mystery Man who is suspected of being at the center of potential upcoming investigations by state and federal authorities as to John's death. Read more about that Mystery Man here - Judge Gildea began Wednesday's hearing by asking counsel for all parties how many depositions have been conducted in the case. "I am hoping at least four have been taken," said Judge Gildea. The O'Keefe lawyer told Judge Gildea that only three depositions have taken place. Judge then asked the O'Keefe lawyer what depositions need to still take place for the plaintiffs. "There are 12," the O'Keefe lawyer responded, including Paul Markowski. The O'Keefe lawyers also need to change Karen's deposition until June 24th. The O'Keefe lawyers changed Karen's deposition from July to June 19th, but multiple lawyer's will not be working on that day as that day is a federal holiday. Judge was not pleased that so few depositions have taken place, but Judge understood that June 19th is a federal holiday and, in turn, Karen's deposition will be held on June 24th, 2026. Karen's lawyers had proposed four other dates and Mr. Diller (the O'Keefe lawyer) picked a federal holiday, instead. "It is beyond belief to me the number of experienced lawyers involved in this case, the length the case has been pending...for however long it has been pending for all parties...that there are so few depositions that have taken place...I don't need to hear all the details, and the nitpicking, what I need to hear is, going forward, how you all are going to get the discovery done," Judge Gildea said to all lawyers. Things, at that point, got quite intense, as Karen's lawyers then noted to Judge Gildea that they have six depositions currently scheduled for the following six witnesses; Brian and Nicole Albert, Matthew McCabe, Allie McCabe, Jennifer McCabe and Brian Higgins. However, the law firm for all of those people got back to Karen's lawyers last night, on June 2nd, 2026, at 9:45PM and said NONE of those witnesses could appear on the dates scheduled for their depositions and, for some reason, none of those witnesses are able to appear for depositions until late July of 2026 at the earliest. Stunningly, no reason was given for why those witnesses refused to appear for their depositions on the dates originally proposed by Karen's lawyers, Attorney Rosenberg told Judge Gildea. Those notices of depositions went out on May 5th, 2026, said Karen's lawyers, when Judge Gildea asked about that date (indicating Judge Gildea, already displeased with discovery and deposition delays in the years-old case, was not pleased to hear about witnesses, on their own accord, attempting to delay depositions by two more months). Karen's lawyers, picking up on Judge Gildea's frustration, then noted that they intend to file motions to compel those witnesses to appear for depositions as a result of the proposed delays. Also, during the hearing, it was announced that former Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor will be deposed by Karen Read's lawyers on Monday, June 8th, 2026, per a statement from Karen's lawyers in court on Wednesday. The O'Keefe lawyer, for their part, noted they intend to depose Aidan Kearney, Karen Read, Kaitlin Boudreau Read (Nathan Read's wife), Janet Read, Nathan Read, William Read, multiple witnesses from the bars (C.F. McCarthy's and The Waterfall), and an outstanding deposition that Karen's team needed to move last week. Judge Gildea then asked what, if anything, he could do to help the parties (other than moving quickly on motions before the court when submitted). Both parties said they will involve the court, in motion practice, as needed going forward. Judge then wanted to know what motions have been sent out under Rule 9(a). It was at that point that Karen's lawyers announced that she will be filing a motion to compel production of documents and the deposition of Colin Albert. "Colin Albert refused to appear or produce documents...his attorney said he is unavailable and then, suddenly, said Colin would only be available for seven more days and then [Colin] would be gone for the entire discovery period," Karen's Lawyer, Aaron Rosenberg, told Judge Mark Gildea during the hearing. Earlier, Karen also announced that she intends to file similar motions for Brian Higgins, Matt McCabe, Jen McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert, as those witnesses are attempting to avoid their depositions until late July or early August of 2026. The O'Keefe lawyer, for their part, told Judge Gildea they intend to serve a motion to compel regarding Aidan Kearney as a keeper of record (and, for some reason, Diller wants documents from Aidan's ongoing case in Norfolk Superior Court). "File a motion and we'll put it on for an expedited hearing," Judge Gildea said regarding that issue, and any other motions to compel the parties may want to file (including the motion regarding Colin Albert that has already been served, and should be in the docket in the next few weeks). When a motion is served under Rule 9(a), it is first given to the opposing party who then responds. Then, the moving party (the "movant") is able to file a sur-reply. Only at that point does the entire motion to compel get compiled as a so-called "Rule 9 (a) package" and, in turn, appear on the docket (with all filings related to a given motion showing up at the same time). It is unclear when the motions to compel the depositions of Brian Higgins, Jen McCabe, Matt McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert will be served and, eventually, docketed with the court. Penalties for third-parties who avoid discovery, or document production requests, can include court sanctions, compelled deposition dates, and adverse evidentiary rulings if a motion to compel is granted, yet further delays then occur. Judge Gildea told all of the lawyers present that he expects to dive deep into the issue of who was issued deposition notices in this case, who avoided those depositions, who delayed depositions and, in turn, what remedies the court will impose. "We served it Monday," the O'Keefe lawyer then said, as the hearing ended (indicating a number of motions to compel discovery, or depositions, may be heard over the coming weeks under the sweltering heat of Judge Gildea's virtual courtroom stare). More as I know it.

Grant Smith Ellis

24,953 次观看 • 2 个月前

Excited to announce UtilitySat, the world’s first multi-mission geostationary satellite, that we're launching at the end of this year. This is a first of its kind. And a new product line-- providing on-demand connectivity for disaster relief, bridge capacity, and other missions. We started Astranis to build something new: small communications satellites that provide dedicated broadband capacity for our customers. At the end of this year we’re launching four more of them on a dedicated Falcon 9 rocket, with many more to come after that. That launch of four satellites includes one satellite for Peru, two satellites for in-flight connectivity, and a fourth satellite that had been previously kept under wraps. Until now. Introducing UtilitySat, the Swiss Army Knife of satellites This is a new product— the world’s first multi-mission commercial GEO satellite, capable of conducting multiple fully-operational broadband connectivity missions. And it is just the first of many. We’ll plan to launch many UtilitySats in the years to come. UtilitySat can provide connectivity on standard Ku, Ka, and Q/V bands, and has the flexibility to dial in exact frequencies using Astranis’s proprietary ultra-wideband software-defined radio. It can also relocate dozens of times around the GEO belt over its lifetime. It does this using our unique on-board dual-propulsion architecture, which includes both a chemical monopropellant system and an electric ion thruster. A new mission every year, or every month When we first began development of UtilitySat almost 2 years ago, we had many different missions in mind. UtilitySat can serve as bridge capacity for a customer that is waiting for a dedicated satellite, as an on-orbit spare, or as extra, surge capacity that can be brought in to supplement the broadband service we’re providing to one of our customers. There are acute needs as well — a natural disaster can wipe out terrestrial connectivity over a huge geographic area. One of the top priorities for first responders and during disaster relief is reliable comms on the ground. With multiple UtilitySats on orbit, Astranis can bring in extra capacity on incredibly short notice. Capacity that is compatible with existing, low-cost GEO ground terminals. In initial conversations with customers for UtilitySat, we’ve seen huge demand — these customers often want to lease the entire capacity of the satellite once they learn what UtilitySat can offer. Customers need all the capacity they can get, and new capacity that can be deployed on short notice is a huge deal and a huge departure from traditional GEO satellites. We see a future where customers will be able to call up extra capacity on demand to augment their existing capacity needs, and we’re making that future a reality. US Government applications The first UtilitySat mission will be a commercial one, but we are seeing enormous demand from both from commercial companies and from our government customers. The US Government has unique needs — Combatant Commanders need to be able to task dedicated satellites to specific AORs at a moment’s notice — and surge communications would give them a new tool in their toolbox, helping them win even in a contested environment. And more broadly speaking our military leaders have said the one priority in national security space is to add resiliency to our fleets, using larger numbers of smaller, flexible, and maneuverable satellites so we’re not dependent on just a handful of huge satellites in GEO. UtilitySat shows that Astranis can do just that. Not traditional GEO satellites UtilitySat is only possible because of Astranis’s unique technology — including our proprietary software–defined radio. The flexibility of having on-board digital signal processing allows us to build a standardized satellite design, and move a lot of what used to be done in hardware, into software. UtilitySat uses the standard Astranis MicroGEO platform, adding more frequency bands and some new software capabilities to make maximum use of the available spectrum, no matter where the satellite is on orbit. Traditional geostationary satellites are designed to sit in one orbital slot for up to 20 years, with a set of frequency bands that is hardwired in at the factory. Their single mission must be predetermined many years before they are launched. Astranis does not build traditional GEO satellites. From day one we knew there had to be a better way, and we’re doing it.

Excited to announce UtilitySat, the world’s first multi-mission geostationary satellite, that we're launching at the end of this year. This is a first of its kind. And a new product line-- providing on-demand connectivity for disaster relief, bridge capacity, and other missions. We started Astranis to build something new: small communications satellites that provide dedicated broadband capacity for our customers. At the end of this year we’re launching four more of them on a dedicated Falcon 9 rocket, with many more to come after that. That launch of four satellites includes one satellite for Peru, two satellites for in-flight connectivity, and a fourth satellite that had been previously kept under wraps. Until now. Introducing UtilitySat, the Swiss Army Knife of satellites This is a new product— the world’s first multi-mission commercial GEO satellite, capable of conducting multiple fully-operational broadband connectivity missions. And it is just the first of many. We’ll plan to launch many UtilitySats in the years to come. UtilitySat can provide connectivity on standard Ku, Ka, and Q/V bands, and has the flexibility to dial in exact frequencies using Astranis’s proprietary ultra-wideband software-defined radio. It can also relocate dozens of times around the GEO belt over its lifetime. It does this using our unique on-board dual-propulsion architecture, which includes both a chemical monopropellant system and an electric ion thruster. A new mission every year, or every month When we first began development of UtilitySat almost 2 years ago, we had many different missions in mind. UtilitySat can serve as bridge capacity for a customer that is waiting for a dedicated satellite, as an on-orbit spare, or as extra, surge capacity that can be brought in to supplement the broadband service we’re providing to one of our customers. There are acute needs as well — a natural disaster can wipe out terrestrial connectivity over a huge geographic area. One of the top priorities for first responders and during disaster relief is reliable comms on the ground. With multiple UtilitySats on orbit, Astranis can bring in extra capacity on incredibly short notice. Capacity that is compatible with existing, low-cost GEO ground terminals. In initial conversations with customers for UtilitySat, we’ve seen huge demand — these customers often want to lease the entire capacity of the satellite once they learn what UtilitySat can offer. Customers need all the capacity they can get, and new capacity that can be deployed on short notice is a huge deal and a huge departure from traditional GEO satellites. We see a future where customers will be able to call up extra capacity on demand to augment their existing capacity needs, and we’re making that future a reality. US Government applications The first UtilitySat mission will be a commercial one, but we are seeing enormous demand from both from commercial companies and from our government customers. The US Government has unique needs — Combatant Commanders need to be able to task dedicated satellites to specific AORs at a moment’s notice — and surge communications would give them a new tool in their toolbox, helping them win even in a contested environment. And more broadly speaking our military leaders have said the one priority in national security space is to add resiliency to our fleets, using larger numbers of smaller, flexible, and maneuverable satellites so we’re not dependent on just a handful of huge satellites in GEO. UtilitySat shows that Astranis can do just that. Not traditional GEO satellites UtilitySat is only possible because of Astranis’s unique technology — including our proprietary software–defined radio. The flexibility of having on-board digital signal processing allows us to build a standardized satellite design, and move a lot of what used to be done in hardware, into software. UtilitySat uses the standard Astranis MicroGEO platform, adding more frequency bands and some new software capabilities to make maximum use of the available spectrum, no matter where the satellite is on orbit. Traditional geostationary satellites are designed to sit in one orbital slot for up to 20 years, with a set of frequency bands that is hardwired in at the factory. Their single mission must be predetermined many years before they are launched. Astranis does not build traditional GEO satellites. From day one we knew there had to be a better way, and we’re doing it.

John Gedmark

122,069 次观看 • 3 年前

In Russia - a brilliantly shot mini-film by German director Vincent Urban about the most beautiful country. Of course, this is a film about Russia, which is called "In Russia". In it, he showed not only the natural beauties, but also the types of different people. There are hooligans, shepherds, and soldiers. The film really turned out to be very large-scale, although it only lasts 6.5 minutes. It's breathtaking. The atmosphere of our country is so brilliantly conveyed. In 6.5 minutes, absolutely different people with different needs and desires, living in different natural and climatic zones, are shown. And all of this is our huge, beautiful country, Russia 俄罗斯 🇷🇺 --------------------------------------------- The Soviet Union (USSR), which was a communist state under Marxist-Leninist ideology, dissolved on December 26, 1991. The Russian Federation that emerged is a separate country with a different system. Key Facts About Modern Russia - Constitution and Government: Russia's 1993 Constitution establishes it as a democratic federal republic with a multi-party system, separation of powers (though in practice it's highly centralized under the president), and recognition of ideological diversity. No single ideology, including communism, is declared as state ideology. It describes Russia as a "social state" but operates within a market economy framework. - Economy: Russia has a mixed capitalist economy with private ownership, markets, oligarchs, and significant state involvement in key sectors (e.g., energy). It is not based on collective ownership of the means of production or central planning as in Soviet communism. - Politics: Vladimir Putin and the dominant United Russia party lead an authoritarian system. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF/KPRF) exists as the second-largest party and adheres to Marxist-Leninist ideas in theory. However, it typically gets 10-20% of the vote, functions as a systemic opposition (often patriotic and socially conservative), and does not control the government. - Russia is not listed among the remaining countries with communist governments (e.g., China, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, North Korea). Putin has nostalgia for certain Soviet aspects (like strong state power), but he has criticized Lenin, pursued nationalist policies, and built a system based on personalist authoritarianism, state capitalism, and Orthodox Christian cultural elements rather than communist ideology. In short, while Soviet-era symbols and nostalgia persist for some, Russia's current system is fundamentally post-communist.

In Russia - a brilliantly shot mini-film by German director Vincent Urban about the most beautiful country. Of course, this is a film about Russia, which is called "In Russia". In it, he showed not only the natural beauties, but also the types of different people. There are hooligans, shepherds, and soldiers. The film really turned out to be very large-scale, although it only lasts 6.5 minutes. It's breathtaking. The atmosphere of our country is so brilliantly conveyed. In 6.5 minutes, absolutely different people with different needs and desires, living in different natural and climatic zones, are shown. And all of this is our huge, beautiful country, Russia 俄罗斯 🇷🇺 --------------------------------------------- The Soviet Union (USSR), which was a communist state under Marxist-Leninist ideology, dissolved on December 26, 1991. The Russian Federation that emerged is a separate country with a different system. Key Facts About Modern Russia - Constitution and Government: Russia's 1993 Constitution establishes it as a democratic federal republic with a multi-party system, separation of powers (though in practice it's highly centralized under the president), and recognition of ideological diversity. No single ideology, including communism, is declared as state ideology. It describes Russia as a "social state" but operates within a market economy framework. - Economy: Russia has a mixed capitalist economy with private ownership, markets, oligarchs, and significant state involvement in key sectors (e.g., energy). It is not based on collective ownership of the means of production or central planning as in Soviet communism. - Politics: Vladimir Putin and the dominant United Russia party lead an authoritarian system. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF/KPRF) exists as the second-largest party and adheres to Marxist-Leninist ideas in theory. However, it typically gets 10-20% of the vote, functions as a systemic opposition (often patriotic and socially conservative), and does not control the government. - Russia is not listed among the remaining countries with communist governments (e.g., China, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, North Korea). Putin has nostalgia for certain Soviet aspects (like strong state power), but he has criticized Lenin, pursued nationalist policies, and built a system based on personalist authoritarianism, state capitalism, and Orthodox Christian cultural elements rather than communist ideology. In short, while Soviet-era symbols and nostalgia persist for some, Russia's current system is fundamentally post-communist.

Mofobian

36,981 次观看 • 2 个月前

Who Is the Antichrist and Why Is He Associated With Technology? In our modern times the Antichrist is making headlines. In these discussions he is frequently associated with the rapid development of technology and various technocratic figures. Why is that? Certainly there are different undercurrents in the Christian Tradition that hint to the oppressive and consolidating power of technology, however, an even deeper explanation arises when we examine the esoteric principals behind Antichrist. First off, the Antichrist in not a metaphor, nor is he an allegory. He is not simply your 'shadow self' or an 'archetypal image of human evil'. He is an entity, an actual spiritual being that will take a body in the future. This incarnation will mark the official delineation of humanity into two distinct streams: those who organize themselves around life and morality, and those who organize themselves around death and immorality. While this is certainly disturbing to consider, this is how humanity evolves, under certain spiritual and even social pressures, we are whittled down to our genuine core beliefs. It is unavoidable, and thus why all people should be properly educated on the coming incarnation of the Antichrist to prepare themselves. Secondly, the Antichrist is associated with transhumanism and technology because these things represent his own nature. They are symbols of him. The Antichrist is, quite simply, machine-like. He is soulless. He therefore enters into technology because technology is his equal. His forces are readily emerging from machines as they bear his likeness. Machines are a form of sympathetic magic, and from them the forces of the subatomic , sub-natural world emerge. While Christ is the way, the truth and the life, the Antichrist is the undoing of humanity, the lie, and death. The Antichrist therefore emerges from the sub-natural plane, or from the world of death. He arrives here as a being of systematic decay. he is embodied and emboldened in the empty shells, both human and inhuman, that bear his symbol. He is seeking to consume life, to coldly and robotically break it apart. In contrast, Christ descended from the spiritual world, from heaven, to give life. To free humanity from death and the constant entropic appetites of the underworld. Lastly, in Christian Esotericism, the appearance of the Antichrist marks a significant cosmic event: the beginning of the return of the moon. Here, in our relationship with the moon, we also see the automatic, machine like quality of nature. Spiritually, the moon often appears as a machine, it feels as a machine feels. It's rhythms are set and cast upon the earth to deal with. This is not because it is actually synthetic, or a technological object, but rather because it retains a connection to the sub-natural realm. The lunar sphere is our gate to the underworld. Further, the moon is often associated with the animal level of consciousness, or, the prior development of humanity, or the old 'lunar condition' of man. The lunar sphere, therefore, contains what has been reduced to unconscious impulses in present day humanity. All that lies in the unconscious mind lives in the realm of the moon. In this way man is confronting, through the slow return of the moon to the earth, his own mechanical unexamined impulses, his own unconsciousness. And thus, behind the moon, in its darkest region, lies perhaps the greatest secret of Ahriman, the Antichrist. After all, it was the mystic G.I. Gurdjieff who reminded us that we are 'food for the moon' meaning that we often end up dissolving ourselves into, or losing ourselves in, what we have not yet overcome. We become possessed by what we refuse to acknowledge and take responsibility for. The lunar spirits are hungry ghosts bearing unnatural gifts. Man must now awaken to his unconscious, machine-like impulses. In turn it is our awakening, our making conscious of what is unconscious through Christ, that reveals the reality of the Antichrist.

Who Is the Antichrist and Why Is He Associated With Technology? In our modern times the Antichrist is making headlines. In these discussions he is frequently associated with the rapid development of technology and various technocratic figures. Why is that? Certainly there are different undercurrents in the Christian Tradition that hint to the oppressive and consolidating power of technology, however, an even deeper explanation arises when we examine the esoteric principals behind Antichrist. First off, the Antichrist in not a metaphor, nor is he an allegory. He is not simply your 'shadow self' or an 'archetypal image of human evil'. He is an entity, an actual spiritual being that will take a body in the future. This incarnation will mark the official delineation of humanity into two distinct streams: those who organize themselves around life and morality, and those who organize themselves around death and immorality. While this is certainly disturbing to consider, this is how humanity evolves, under certain spiritual and even social pressures, we are whittled down to our genuine core beliefs. It is unavoidable, and thus why all people should be properly educated on the coming incarnation of the Antichrist to prepare themselves. Secondly, the Antichrist is associated with transhumanism and technology because these things represent his own nature. They are symbols of him. The Antichrist is, quite simply, machine-like. He is soulless. He therefore enters into technology because technology is his equal. His forces are readily emerging from machines as they bear his likeness. Machines are a form of sympathetic magic, and from them the forces of the subatomic , sub-natural world emerge. While Christ is the way, the truth and the life, the Antichrist is the undoing of humanity, the lie, and death. The Antichrist therefore emerges from the sub-natural plane, or from the world of death. He arrives here as a being of systematic decay. he is embodied and emboldened in the empty shells, both human and inhuman, that bear his symbol. He is seeking to consume life, to coldly and robotically break it apart. In contrast, Christ descended from the spiritual world, from heaven, to give life. To free humanity from death and the constant entropic appetites of the underworld. Lastly, in Christian Esotericism, the appearance of the Antichrist marks a significant cosmic event: the beginning of the return of the moon. Here, in our relationship with the moon, we also see the automatic, machine like quality of nature. Spiritually, the moon often appears as a machine, it feels as a machine feels. It's rhythms are set and cast upon the earth to deal with. This is not because it is actually synthetic, or a technological object, but rather because it retains a connection to the sub-natural realm. The lunar sphere is our gate to the underworld. Further, the moon is often associated with the animal level of consciousness, or, the prior development of humanity, or the old 'lunar condition' of man. The lunar sphere, therefore, contains what has been reduced to unconscious impulses in present day humanity. All that lies in the unconscious mind lives in the realm of the moon. In this way man is confronting, through the slow return of the moon to the earth, his own mechanical unexamined impulses, his own unconsciousness. And thus, behind the moon, in its darkest region, lies perhaps the greatest secret of Ahriman, the Antichrist. After all, it was the mystic G.I. Gurdjieff who reminded us that we are 'food for the moon' meaning that we often end up dissolving ourselves into, or losing ourselves in, what we have not yet overcome. We become possessed by what we refuse to acknowledge and take responsibility for. The lunar spirits are hungry ghosts bearing unnatural gifts. Man must now awaken to his unconscious, machine-like impulses. In turn it is our awakening, our making conscious of what is unconscious through Christ, that reveals the reality of the Antichrist.

Gigi Young

13,559 次观看 • 11 个月前

I'm finally releasing my entire conversation with Farha Khalidi and Jazmen Jafar. They are OnlyFans celebrities from Muslim backgrounds who are known for wiping the floor with manosphere types in debates. Watch the whole thing on X! Farha is also a comedian and has 1.8 million followers on TikTok. Jazmen went to law school, but decided posting naked pictures and having sex was a lot funner than becoming a lawyer and paid better. We discuss the manosphere, influencers like Nala Ray and Andrew Tate, anti-porn regulations, how their families feel about their jobs, and much more. You'll want to watch this. Time stamps are included. 0:00 Intros and the girls' ethnic and career backgrounds 1:53 How the girls got started in OnlyFans and manosphere debates 6:45 Are Middle Eastern women more dominant? 9:15 How their families reacted to OnlyFans. I talk about growing up with Middle East parents 13:20 The first nude photo they took. What's it like to take the plunge? The girls talk about getting started as content creators 20:30 On doing OnlyFans chats with users, and what they like to talk about. They discuss stalkers and getting doxxed 23:20 On the unattractiveness of manosphere types. How serious are they about their beliefs? 28:00 Andrew Tate "converting" to Islam, and other goofy influencers including tradcaths, etc 32:30 Me on what is healthy and unhealthy about the manosphere space 34:20 On whether people should get married and have kids, collapsing fertility 40:40 OnlyFans subscriber demographics, and what they want 46:45 Nala Ray converting to Christianity 48:40 What are JOIs? 52:45 Working real jobs and going to law school 1:04:40 Getting hit on in public, and why young men no think they can approach women 1:11:45 Getting offered money to do Biden propaganda on TikTok 1:24:00 Having natural boobs 1:30:40 Farha on debating liberal men, the kind of man she's looking for, and whether she might become a Muslim again or date a groyper 1:31:55 On my past writing, getting doxxed, and what changed. Jazmen calls me the most progressive man they've talked to 1:33:00 Manosphere types as losers without wives or girlfriends, and what it's like to do the "bottom of the barrel" shows 1:38:00 The anti-porn movement, debanking, and legal difficulties 1:50:15 My politics, and how the media covers me

Sensitive content

I'm finally releasing my entire conversation with Farha Khalidi and Jazmen Jafar. They are OnlyFans celebrities from Muslim backgrounds who are known for wiping the floor with manosphere types in debates. Watch the whole thing on X! Farha is also a comedian and has 1.8 million followers on TikTok. Jazmen went to law school, but decided posting naked pictures and having sex was a lot funner than becoming a lawyer and paid better. We discuss the manosphere, influencers like Nala Ray and Andrew Tate, anti-porn regulations, how their families feel about their jobs, and much more. You'll want to watch this. Time stamps are included. 0:00 Intros and the girls' ethnic and career backgrounds 1:53 How the girls got started in OnlyFans and manosphere debates 6:45 Are Middle Eastern women more dominant? 9:15 How their families reacted to OnlyFans. I talk about growing up with Middle East parents 13:20 The first nude photo they took. What's it like to take the plunge? The girls talk about getting started as content creators 20:30 On doing OnlyFans chats with users, and what they like to talk about. They discuss stalkers and getting doxxed 23:20 On the unattractiveness of manosphere types. How serious are they about their beliefs? 28:00 Andrew Tate "converting" to Islam, and other goofy influencers including tradcaths, etc 32:30 Me on what is healthy and unhealthy about the manosphere space 34:20 On whether people should get married and have kids, collapsing fertility 40:40 OnlyFans subscriber demographics, and what they want 46:45 Nala Ray converting to Christianity 48:40 What are JOIs? 52:45 Working real jobs and going to law school 1:04:40 Getting hit on in public, and why young men no think they can approach women 1:11:45 Getting offered money to do Biden propaganda on TikTok 1:24:00 Having natural boobs 1:30:40 Farha on debating liberal men, the kind of man she's looking for, and whether she might become a Muslim again or date a groyper 1:31:55 On my past writing, getting doxxed, and what changed. Jazmen calls me the most progressive man they've talked to 1:33:00 Manosphere types as losers without wives or girlfriends, and what it's like to do the "bottom of the barrel" shows 1:38:00 The anti-porn movement, debanking, and legal difficulties 1:50:15 My politics, and how the media covers me

Richard Hanania

143,924 次观看 • 2 年前

Who needs the Epstein files—the first 16 women to accuse Trump speak out. 👇 #1 Cathy Heller—"He took my hand, and grabbed me, and went for the lips." #2 Jill Harth—"And he just slipped his hand there, touching my private part." #3 Temple Taggart—"He turned to me and embraced me and gave me a kiss on the lips. And I remember being shocked, because I would have just thought to shake somebody's hand, but that was his first response." #4 Cassandra Searles—"He continually grabbed my ass and invited me to his hotel room." #5 Jessica Leeds—"It was a real shock when all of a sudden his hands were all over me. But it's when he started putting his hand up my skirt, and that was it. That was it." #6 Kristin Anderson—"The person on my right, who unbeknownst to me at that time was Donald Trump, put their hand up my skirt. He did touch my vagina through my underwear." #7 Lisa Boyne—"As the women walked across the table, Donald Trump would look up under their skirt and, you know, comment on whether they had underwear or didn't have underwear. I didn't want to have to walk across the table. I wanted to get out of there." #8 Karena Virginia—"Then his hand touched the right inside of my breast. I felt intimidated and I felt powerless." #9 Mindy McGillivray—"Melania was standing right next to him when he touched my butt. She also caught him at the first encounter that we had." #10 Rachel Crooks—"He kissed me directly on the mouth. It was so inappropriate. He thought I was so insignificant he could do that." #11 Natasha Stoynoff—"I don't really care if he finds me attractive or not. Apparently, he found me attractive enough 11 years ago. I think that he's saying there that only pretty women get assaulted." #12 Jessica Drake—"When we entered the room, he grabbed each of us tightly in a hug and kissed each one of us without asking permission. After that, I received another call from either Donald or a male calling on his behalf, offering me ten thousand dollars. His actions are a huge testament to his character, that of uncontrollable misogyny, entitlement, and being a sexual assault apologist." #13 Ninni Laaksonen—"He really grabbed my butt. Mr. Trump was a slimy man!" #14 Samantha Holvey—"I'm sitting there in my robe and having my makeup and hair done and everything, and he comes walking in, and I was just like, Oh my goodness, like what is he doing back here? I saw him walk into the dressing room. He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on or any sort of clothing or anything. Some girls were topless, other girls were naked." #15 Tash Dixon—"He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on. Some girls were topless, and other girls were naked. Walking in when we're naked or half naked in a very physically vulnerable position." #16 Summer Zervos—"And he came to me and started kissing me open-mouthed as he was pulling me towards him. He then grabbed my shoulder and began kissing me again very aggressively and placed his hand on my breast. And I said, come on, man, get real. He repeated my words back to me. Get real. As he began thrusting his genitals." #DemVoice1 #wtpBLUE #DemsUnited

Sensitive content

Who needs the Epstein files—the first 16 women to accuse Trump speak out. 👇 #1 Cathy Heller—"He took my hand, and grabbed me, and went for the lips." #2 Jill Harth—"And he just slipped his hand there, touching my private part." #3 Temple Taggart—"He turned to me and embraced me and gave me a kiss on the lips. And I remember being shocked, because I would have just thought to shake somebody's hand, but that was his first response." #4 Cassandra Searles—"He continually grabbed my ass and invited me to his hotel room." #5 Jessica Leeds—"It was a real shock when all of a sudden his hands were all over me. But it's when he started putting his hand up my skirt, and that was it. That was it." #6 Kristin Anderson—"The person on my right, who unbeknownst to me at that time was Donald Trump, put their hand up my skirt. He did touch my vagina through my underwear." #7 Lisa Boyne—"As the women walked across the table, Donald Trump would look up under their skirt and, you know, comment on whether they had underwear or didn't have underwear. I didn't want to have to walk across the table. I wanted to get out of there." #8 Karena Virginia—"Then his hand touched the right inside of my breast. I felt intimidated and I felt powerless." #9 Mindy McGillivray—"Melania was standing right next to him when he touched my butt. She also caught him at the first encounter that we had." #10 Rachel Crooks—"He kissed me directly on the mouth. It was so inappropriate. He thought I was so insignificant he could do that." #11 Natasha Stoynoff—"I don't really care if he finds me attractive or not. Apparently, he found me attractive enough 11 years ago. I think that he's saying there that only pretty women get assaulted." #12 Jessica Drake—"When we entered the room, he grabbed each of us tightly in a hug and kissed each one of us without asking permission. After that, I received another call from either Donald or a male calling on his behalf, offering me ten thousand dollars. His actions are a huge testament to his character, that of uncontrollable misogyny, entitlement, and being a sexual assault apologist." #13 Ninni Laaksonen—"He really grabbed my butt. Mr. Trump was a slimy man!" #14 Samantha Holvey—"I'm sitting there in my robe and having my makeup and hair done and everything, and he comes walking in, and I was just like, Oh my goodness, like what is he doing back here? I saw him walk into the dressing room. He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on or any sort of clothing or anything. Some girls were topless, other girls were naked." #15 Tash Dixon—"He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on. Some girls were topless, and other girls were naked. Walking in when we're naked or half naked in a very physically vulnerable position." #16 Summer Zervos—"And he came to me and started kissing me open-mouthed as he was pulling me towards him. He then grabbed my shoulder and began kissing me again very aggressively and placed his hand on my breast. And I said, come on, man, get real. He repeated my words back to me. Get real. As he began thrusting his genitals." #DemVoice1 #wtpBLUE #DemsUnited

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻

606,823 次观看 • 1 年前

Parklands Residents Decry Sakaja’s Negligence as Mandera Governor’s Controversial Development Destroys Nairobi’s Green Spaces In the name of progress, Parklands is losing its environmental sanctity. The destruction of homes and ecosystems to make way for new developments is unsustainable and unjustifiable. True progress must prioritize the environment, not sacrifice it. Deforestation threatens not only wildlife but also human well-being. As one quote wisely puts it, “A civilization that burns its future to fuel its present isn’t developing — it’s dismantling.” We wish to remind all stakeholders that planting trees is also a form of development. Parklands needs more trees, not just towers. The state is constitutionally obliged to eliminate processes and activities likely to endanger the environment. Yet, under Governor Johnson Sakaja’s administration, we have witnessed a flagrant disregard for this duty. Relevant county officials have ignored repeated and desperate pleas from residents, allowing environmental destruction to continue unchecked. It has been reported that the development in question belongs to the Governor of Mandera County, raising a critical question: Is public money being used to finance private construction projects in Nairobi? Such conflicts of interest deepen mistrust and highlight the urgent need for transparency and accountability in land use approvals within the city. The project site lies within a densely built urban area where most natural vegetation has already been cleared. It contains a single mature Acacia xanthophloea, the only such tree within the vicinity, which currently hosts active weaver bird (Ploceidae family) colonies — specifically the Village Weaver (Ploceus cucullatus) and possibly the Baglafecht Weaver (Ploceus baglafecht). Other bird species also rely on these mature trees and shrubs for nesting and shelter. Weaver birds play a key ecological role by: •Contributing to seed dispersal and insect population control. •Providing nesting material and shelter for smaller species. •Enhancing the aesthetic and ecological value of local environments. Their nesting behavior reflects habitat quality and supports broader biodiversity. However, ongoing excavation has already exposed the acacia’s root system, leaving roots visibly protruding and creating immediate ecological risks. Without urgent intervention, the tree faces destabilization, drying, or collapse, endangering both the tree and the nesting birds. Residents have reported — and environmental assessments have confirmed — the presence of damaged nests, broken eggs, and dead nestlings. There is an urgent need to rescue and protect the remaining active nesting weavers to prevent further loss of wildlife. We urge all responsible agencies and the public to act swiftly. Saving this single acacia is not just about one tree — it is about holding Governor Sakaja’s administration accountable, questioning the use of public funds, and defending Nairobi’s rapidly vanishing urban biodiversity.

Parklands Residents Decry Sakaja’s Negligence as Mandera Governor’s Controversial Development Destroys Nairobi’s Green Spaces In the name of progress, Parklands is losing its environmental sanctity. The destruction of homes and ecosystems to make way for new developments is unsustainable and unjustifiable. True progress must prioritize the environment, not sacrifice it. Deforestation threatens not only wildlife but also human well-being. As one quote wisely puts it, “A civilization that burns its future to fuel its present isn’t developing — it’s dismantling.” We wish to remind all stakeholders that planting trees is also a form of development. Parklands needs more trees, not just towers. The state is constitutionally obliged to eliminate processes and activities likely to endanger the environment. Yet, under Governor Johnson Sakaja’s administration, we have witnessed a flagrant disregard for this duty. Relevant county officials have ignored repeated and desperate pleas from residents, allowing environmental destruction to continue unchecked. It has been reported that the development in question belongs to the Governor of Mandera County, raising a critical question: Is public money being used to finance private construction projects in Nairobi? Such conflicts of interest deepen mistrust and highlight the urgent need for transparency and accountability in land use approvals within the city. The project site lies within a densely built urban area where most natural vegetation has already been cleared. It contains a single mature Acacia xanthophloea, the only such tree within the vicinity, which currently hosts active weaver bird (Ploceidae family) colonies — specifically the Village Weaver (Ploceus cucullatus) and possibly the Baglafecht Weaver (Ploceus baglafecht). Other bird species also rely on these mature trees and shrubs for nesting and shelter. Weaver birds play a key ecological role by: •Contributing to seed dispersal and insect population control. •Providing nesting material and shelter for smaller species. •Enhancing the aesthetic and ecological value of local environments. Their nesting behavior reflects habitat quality and supports broader biodiversity. However, ongoing excavation has already exposed the acacia’s root system, leaving roots visibly protruding and creating immediate ecological risks. Without urgent intervention, the tree faces destabilization, drying, or collapse, endangering both the tree and the nesting birds. Residents have reported — and environmental assessments have confirmed — the presence of damaged nests, broken eggs, and dead nestlings. There is an urgent need to rescue and protect the remaining active nesting weavers to prevent further loss of wildlife. We urge all responsible agencies and the public to act swiftly. Saving this single acacia is not just about one tree — it is about holding Governor Sakaja’s administration accountable, questioning the use of public funds, and defending Nairobi’s rapidly vanishing urban biodiversity.

Nelson Amenya

55,218 次观看 • 9 个月前

BREAKING NEWS🚨🚨🚨:. Michael Proctor lost his last-minute request to delay his deposition in the Karen Read and John O'Keefe civil case. As a result, Proctor is required to attend a deposition with Alan Jackson on June 25th or July 14th. Karen Read and Alan Jackson have won, again. As the ruling was handed down late Monday at the conclusion of a 4:15PM ET Zoom hearing in front of Judge Gildea in Plymouth Superior Court --after an emergency 8:45AM ET hearing led to a six hour race-against-the-clock where Proctor's counsel was given one last chance to provide the court sufficient grounds to delay Proctor's deposition-- I reported: Judge Gildea finds that the supplemental submission does not meet the requirements to delay the deposition. Judge found that the person who submitted a document on Proctor's behalf was not qualified to do so. Then a random person named "Brendon" joined the Zoom and cussed. Then Judge went back to his ruling and found the letter submitted turned the request from Proctor into a request to delay his deposition forever. That, Judge Gildea found, was not what Proctor originally requested. Further, the letter was done by Committee but all Committee members were not present. The motion for a protective order is denied. Proctor shall appear TOMORROW, ruled Judge Gildea originally. However, due to scheduling conflicts for counsel, further discussion needed to occur and the hearing did not end. I then reported: Lawyers for all parties are now heading into a breakout room to discuss the nature of Michael Proctor's deposition. The hearing is not yet over, as Judge Gildea wants an update from Karen Read's counsel about how long this deposition will take before the end for the day. Shock and awe ruling from Judge Gildea right there, as to denying Proctor's request for a proactive order to delay his deposition. After the breakout room ended, I reported; Karen's lawyers propose the dates of June 25th (the day of a status hearing in the case) or July 14th. Judge Gildea modifies his order to say that Proctor shall appear on a date agreed to by counsel. Judge asks what depositions are scheduled for June 24th. The Brian Albert is on June 24th, but that may be subject to a motion to compel. Karen's deposition is also June 24th. The 26th is Matthew McCabe, also subject to discussion and a motion to compel, scheduled for 10AM ET. There will be a status conference on the 26th of June, 2026, at 9:45AM. "The timing of that hearing will encourage us all to be brief," Judge Gildea said. We will see you then. The hearing for June 25th is now moved to June 26th, 2026. Earlier today, I reported; The Michael Proctor and Sean Goode "Proctorgate" files have caused serious damage, and Karen Read stands tall. Read more about those shocking, and abhorrent, messages here (also discussed by Judge Gildea during today's hearing) wherein Proctor (a former State Trooper who investigated Karen Read for the death of John O'Keefe) and former Canton cop Sean Goode talked about everything from how Anne Frank was a "liar" to how Proctor felt Goode should "let them die" after Proctor noticed a car accident victim was, in Proctor's words, a "ni**er". Proctor also discussed "planting cocaine" on someone and, shockingly, said "America sucks" because the country stopped the Third Reich during World War II (while, at the same time, saying "Jews in Sharon" should be "put in a concentration camp") at this link: To this day, the death of John O'Keefe remains unsolved. Proctor is just one of multiple witnesses involving in the twice-failed prosecution of Karen for John's death who Read's lawyers have told Judge Gildea are attempting to avoid or delay depositions (including Colin Albert, Jennifer McCabe, Brian Higgins, Matt McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert). Last week, on Wednesday, I reported: In a shocking hearing before Judge Mark Gildea on Wednesday, Karen Read's lawyers announced that they have been forced to file a motion to compel a deposition of Colin Albert. Further, Karen's lawyers will be filing motions to compel depositions of Jennifer McCabe, Brian Higgins, Matt McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert, as those parties are seeking to delay their depositions until late July, or early August, of 2026. "Colin Albert refused to appear or produce documents...his attorney said he is unavailable and then, suddenly, said Colin would only be available for seven more days and, then, [Colin] would be gone for the entire discovery period," Karen's Lawyer, Aaron Rosenberg, told Judge Gildea during Wednesday's hearing. In that regard, here is the full recording of today's John O'Keefe and Karen Read hearing in Plymouth Superior Court. This case is one of three ongoing civil lawsuits (one in federal court and two in Plymouth District Court in front of Judge Gildea) that stem from the, yet-unsolved, murder of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. To this day, it is unclear if anyone has found the Mystery Man who is suspected of being at the center of potential upcoming investigations by state and federal authorities as to John's death. Read more about that Mystery Man here - More background on last Wednesday's hearing (also involving deposition disputes): Judge Gildea began Wednesday's hearing by asking counsel for all parties how many depositions have been conducted in the case. "I am hoping at least four have been taken," said Judge Gildea. The O'Keefe lawyer told Judge Gildea that only three depositions have taken place. Judge then asked the O'Keefe lawyer what depositions need to still take place for the plaintiffs. "There are 12," the O'Keefe lawyer responded, including Paul Markowski. The O'Keefe lawyers also need to change Karen's deposition until June 24th. The O'Keefe lawyers changed Karen's deposition from July to June 19th, but multiple lawyer's will not be working on that day as that day is a federal holiday. Judge was not pleased that so few depositions have taken place, but Judge understood that June 19th is a federal holiday and, in turn, Karen's deposition will be held on June 24th, 2026. Karen's lawyers had proposed four other dates and Mr. Diller (the O'Keefe lawyer) picked a federal holiday, instead. "It is beyond belief to me the number of experienced lawyers involved in this case, the length the case has been pending...for however long it has been pending for all parties...that there are so few depositions that have taken place...I don't need to hear all the details, and the nitpicking, what I need to hear is, going forward, how you all are going to get the discovery done," Judge Gildea said to all lawyers. Things, at that point, got quite intense, as Karen's lawyers then noted to Judge Gildea that they have six depositions currently scheduled for the following six witnesses; Brian and Nicole Albert, Matthew McCabe, Allie McCabe, Jennifer McCabe and Brian Higgins. However, the law firm for all of those people got back to Karen's lawyers last night, on June 2nd, 2026, at 9:45PM and said NONE of those witnesses could appear on the dates scheduled for their depositions and, for some reason, none of those witnesses are able to appear for depositions until late July of 2026 at the earliest. Stunningly, no reason was given for why those witnesses refused to appear for their depositions on the dates originally proposed by Karen's lawyers, Attorney Rosenberg told Judge Gildea. Those notices of depositions went out on May 5th, 2026, said Karen's lawyers, when Judge Gildea asked about that date (indicating Judge Gildea, already displeased with discovery and deposition delays in the years-old case, was not pleased to hear about witnesses, on their own accord, attempting to delay depositions by two more months). Karen's lawyers, picking up on Judge Gildea's frustration, then noted that they intend to file motions to compel those witnesses to appear for depositions as a result of the proposed delays. Also, during the hearing, it was announced that former Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor will be deposed by Karen Read's lawyers on Monday, June 8th, 2026, per a statement from Karen's lawyers in court on Wednesday. The O'Keefe lawyer, for their part, noted they intend to depose Aidan Kearney, Karen Read, Kaitlin Boudreau Read (Nathan Read's wife), Janet Read, Nathan Read, William Read, multiple witnesses from the bars (C.F. McCarthy's and The Waterfall), and an outstanding deposition that Karen's team needed to move last week. Judge Gildea then asked what, if anything, he could do to help the parties (other than moving quickly on motions before the court when submitted). Both parties said they will involve the court, in motion practice, as needed going forward. Judge then wanted to know what motions have been sent out under Rule 9(a). It was at that point that Karen's lawyers announced that she will be filing a motion to compel production of documents and the deposition of Colin Albert. "Colin Albert refused to appear or produce documents...his attorney said he is unavailable and then, suddenly, said Colin would only be available for seven more days and then [Colin] would be gone for the entire discovery period," Karen's Lawyer, Aaron Rosenberg, told Judge Mark Gildea during the hearing. Earlier, Karen also announced that she intends to file similar motions for Brian Higgins, Matt McCabe, Jen McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert, as those witnesses are attempting to avoid their depositions until late July or early August of 2026. The O'Keefe lawyer, for their part, told Judge Gildea they intend to serve a motion to compel regarding Aidan Kearney as a keeper of record (and, for some reason, Diller wants documents from Aidan's ongoing case in Norfolk Superior Court). "File a motion and we'll put it on for an expedited hearing," Judge Gildea said regarding that issue, and any other motions to compel the parties may want to file (including the motion regarding Colin Albert that has already been served, and should be in the docket in the next few weeks). When a motion is served under Rule 9(a), it is first given to the opposing party who then responds. Then, the moving party (the "movant") is able to file a sur-reply. Only at that point does the entire motion to compel get compiled as a so-called "Rule 9 (a) package" and, in turn, appear on the docket (with all filings related to a given motion showing up at the same time). It is unclear when the motions to compel the depositions of Brian Higgins, Jen McCabe, Matt McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert will be served and, eventually, docketed with the court. Penalties for third-parties who avoid discovery, or document production requests, can include court sanctions, compelled deposition dates, and adverse evidentiary rulings if a motion to compel is granted, yet further delays then occur. Judge Gildea told all of the lawyers present that he expects to dive deep into the issue of who was issued deposition notices in this case, who avoided those depositions, who delayed depositions and, in turn, what remedies the court will impose. "We served it Monday," the O'Keefe lawyer then said, as the hearing ended (indicating a number of motions to compel discovery, or depositions, may be heard over the coming weeks under the sweltering heat of Judge Gildea's virtual courtroom stare).

BREAKING NEWS🚨🚨🚨:. Michael Proctor lost his last-minute request to delay his deposition in the Karen Read and John O'Keefe civil case. As a result, Proctor is required to attend a deposition with Alan Jackson on June 25th or July 14th. Karen Read and Alan Jackson have won, again. As the ruling was handed down late Monday at the conclusion of a 4:15PM ET Zoom hearing in front of Judge Gildea in Plymouth Superior Court --after an emergency 8:45AM ET hearing led to a six hour race-against-the-clock where Proctor's counsel was given one last chance to provide the court sufficient grounds to delay Proctor's deposition-- I reported: Judge Gildea finds that the supplemental submission does not meet the requirements to delay the deposition. Judge found that the person who submitted a document on Proctor's behalf was not qualified to do so. Then a random person named "Brendon" joined the Zoom and cussed. Then Judge went back to his ruling and found the letter submitted turned the request from Proctor into a request to delay his deposition forever. That, Judge Gildea found, was not what Proctor originally requested. Further, the letter was done by Committee but all Committee members were not present. The motion for a protective order is denied. Proctor shall appear TOMORROW, ruled Judge Gildea originally. However, due to scheduling conflicts for counsel, further discussion needed to occur and the hearing did not end. I then reported: Lawyers for all parties are now heading into a breakout room to discuss the nature of Michael Proctor's deposition. The hearing is not yet over, as Judge Gildea wants an update from Karen Read's counsel about how long this deposition will take before the end for the day. Shock and awe ruling from Judge Gildea right there, as to denying Proctor's request for a proactive order to delay his deposition. After the breakout room ended, I reported; Karen's lawyers propose the dates of June 25th (the day of a status hearing in the case) or July 14th. Judge Gildea modifies his order to say that Proctor shall appear on a date agreed to by counsel. Judge asks what depositions are scheduled for June 24th. The Brian Albert is on June 24th, but that may be subject to a motion to compel. Karen's deposition is also June 24th. The 26th is Matthew McCabe, also subject to discussion and a motion to compel, scheduled for 10AM ET. There will be a status conference on the 26th of June, 2026, at 9:45AM. "The timing of that hearing will encourage us all to be brief," Judge Gildea said. We will see you then. The hearing for June 25th is now moved to June 26th, 2026. Earlier today, I reported; The Michael Proctor and Sean Goode "Proctorgate" files have caused serious damage, and Karen Read stands tall. Read more about those shocking, and abhorrent, messages here (also discussed by Judge Gildea during today's hearing) wherein Proctor (a former State Trooper who investigated Karen Read for the death of John O'Keefe) and former Canton cop Sean Goode talked about everything from how Anne Frank was a "liar" to how Proctor felt Goode should "let them die" after Proctor noticed a car accident victim was, in Proctor's words, a "ni**er". Proctor also discussed "planting cocaine" on someone and, shockingly, said "America sucks" because the country stopped the Third Reich during World War II (while, at the same time, saying "Jews in Sharon" should be "put in a concentration camp") at this link: To this day, the death of John O'Keefe remains unsolved. Proctor is just one of multiple witnesses involving in the twice-failed prosecution of Karen for John's death who Read's lawyers have told Judge Gildea are attempting to avoid or delay depositions (including Colin Albert, Jennifer McCabe, Brian Higgins, Matt McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert). Last week, on Wednesday, I reported: In a shocking hearing before Judge Mark Gildea on Wednesday, Karen Read's lawyers announced that they have been forced to file a motion to compel a deposition of Colin Albert. Further, Karen's lawyers will be filing motions to compel depositions of Jennifer McCabe, Brian Higgins, Matt McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert, as those parties are seeking to delay their depositions until late July, or early August, of 2026. "Colin Albert refused to appear or produce documents...his attorney said he is unavailable and then, suddenly, said Colin would only be available for seven more days and, then, [Colin] would be gone for the entire discovery period," Karen's Lawyer, Aaron Rosenberg, told Judge Gildea during Wednesday's hearing. In that regard, here is the full recording of today's John O'Keefe and Karen Read hearing in Plymouth Superior Court. This case is one of three ongoing civil lawsuits (one in federal court and two in Plymouth District Court in front of Judge Gildea) that stem from the, yet-unsolved, murder of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. To this day, it is unclear if anyone has found the Mystery Man who is suspected of being at the center of potential upcoming investigations by state and federal authorities as to John's death. Read more about that Mystery Man here - More background on last Wednesday's hearing (also involving deposition disputes): Judge Gildea began Wednesday's hearing by asking counsel for all parties how many depositions have been conducted in the case. "I am hoping at least four have been taken," said Judge Gildea. The O'Keefe lawyer told Judge Gildea that only three depositions have taken place. Judge then asked the O'Keefe lawyer what depositions need to still take place for the plaintiffs. "There are 12," the O'Keefe lawyer responded, including Paul Markowski. The O'Keefe lawyers also need to change Karen's deposition until June 24th. The O'Keefe lawyers changed Karen's deposition from July to June 19th, but multiple lawyer's will not be working on that day as that day is a federal holiday. Judge was not pleased that so few depositions have taken place, but Judge understood that June 19th is a federal holiday and, in turn, Karen's deposition will be held on June 24th, 2026. Karen's lawyers had proposed four other dates and Mr. Diller (the O'Keefe lawyer) picked a federal holiday, instead. "It is beyond belief to me the number of experienced lawyers involved in this case, the length the case has been pending...for however long it has been pending for all parties...that there are so few depositions that have taken place...I don't need to hear all the details, and the nitpicking, what I need to hear is, going forward, how you all are going to get the discovery done," Judge Gildea said to all lawyers. Things, at that point, got quite intense, as Karen's lawyers then noted to Judge Gildea that they have six depositions currently scheduled for the following six witnesses; Brian and Nicole Albert, Matthew McCabe, Allie McCabe, Jennifer McCabe and Brian Higgins. However, the law firm for all of those people got back to Karen's lawyers last night, on June 2nd, 2026, at 9:45PM and said NONE of those witnesses could appear on the dates scheduled for their depositions and, for some reason, none of those witnesses are able to appear for depositions until late July of 2026 at the earliest. Stunningly, no reason was given for why those witnesses refused to appear for their depositions on the dates originally proposed by Karen's lawyers, Attorney Rosenberg told Judge Gildea. Those notices of depositions went out on May 5th, 2026, said Karen's lawyers, when Judge Gildea asked about that date (indicating Judge Gildea, already displeased with discovery and deposition delays in the years-old case, was not pleased to hear about witnesses, on their own accord, attempting to delay depositions by two more months). Karen's lawyers, picking up on Judge Gildea's frustration, then noted that they intend to file motions to compel those witnesses to appear for depositions as a result of the proposed delays. Also, during the hearing, it was announced that former Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor will be deposed by Karen Read's lawyers on Monday, June 8th, 2026, per a statement from Karen's lawyers in court on Wednesday. The O'Keefe lawyer, for their part, noted they intend to depose Aidan Kearney, Karen Read, Kaitlin Boudreau Read (Nathan Read's wife), Janet Read, Nathan Read, William Read, multiple witnesses from the bars (C.F. McCarthy's and The Waterfall), and an outstanding deposition that Karen's team needed to move last week. Judge Gildea then asked what, if anything, he could do to help the parties (other than moving quickly on motions before the court when submitted). Both parties said they will involve the court, in motion practice, as needed going forward. Judge then wanted to know what motions have been sent out under Rule 9(a). It was at that point that Karen's lawyers announced that she will be filing a motion to compel production of documents and the deposition of Colin Albert. "Colin Albert refused to appear or produce documents...his attorney said he is unavailable and then, suddenly, said Colin would only be available for seven more days and then [Colin] would be gone for the entire discovery period," Karen's Lawyer, Aaron Rosenberg, told Judge Mark Gildea during the hearing. Earlier, Karen also announced that she intends to file similar motions for Brian Higgins, Matt McCabe, Jen McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert, as those witnesses are attempting to avoid their depositions until late July or early August of 2026. The O'Keefe lawyer, for their part, told Judge Gildea they intend to serve a motion to compel regarding Aidan Kearney as a keeper of record (and, for some reason, Diller wants documents from Aidan's ongoing case in Norfolk Superior Court). "File a motion and we'll put it on for an expedited hearing," Judge Gildea said regarding that issue, and any other motions to compel the parties may want to file (including the motion regarding Colin Albert that has already been served, and should be in the docket in the next few weeks). When a motion is served under Rule 9(a), it is first given to the opposing party who then responds. Then, the moving party (the "movant") is able to file a sur-reply. Only at that point does the entire motion to compel get compiled as a so-called "Rule 9 (a) package" and, in turn, appear on the docket (with all filings related to a given motion showing up at the same time). It is unclear when the motions to compel the depositions of Brian Higgins, Jen McCabe, Matt McCabe, Nicole Albert and Brian Albert will be served and, eventually, docketed with the court. Penalties for third-parties who avoid discovery, or document production requests, can include court sanctions, compelled deposition dates, and adverse evidentiary rulings if a motion to compel is granted, yet further delays then occur. Judge Gildea told all of the lawyers present that he expects to dive deep into the issue of who was issued deposition notices in this case, who avoided those depositions, who delayed depositions and, in turn, what remedies the court will impose. "We served it Monday," the O'Keefe lawyer then said, as the hearing ended (indicating a number of motions to compel discovery, or depositions, may be heard over the coming weeks under the sweltering heat of Judge Gildea's virtual courtroom stare).

Grant Smith Ellis

34,808 次观看 • 2 个月前