Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

NCBA sent a mass text to cattle producers this week. The text called MCOOL supporters "activists." It said mandatory country of origin labeling is "failed policy" and "pro-government, not pro-consumer or pro-cattleman." It claimed MCOOL would cost the industry $1 billion a year. The text had NCBA letterhead. You...

BeefMaps's profile picture

SAVE BEEF 🇺🇸 BeefMaps.com

59,144 subscribers

12,053 views • 14 days ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

“If you love America and you love American farmers and ranchers, then how can you be against the idea that we’re gonna label where our beef and our food comes from.” “There’s just no question on this one.” “It’s black and white.” USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins says she fully supports restoring Mandatory Country-of-Origin Labeling (MCOOL). Farm Action is encouraged to hear this, but now we need to turn those words into action. Thursday’s Farm Bill hearing showed promising movement toward restoring MCOOL, even though the overall bill did not advance out of committee. With bipartisan support building in Congress and Secretary Rollins fully backing MCOOL, we have a real opportunity to finally restore it. The momentum is there. Now Congress needs to get it done. Lonesome Lands Secretary Brooke Rollins
0:36

“If you love America and you love American farmers and ranchers, then how can you be against the idea that we’re gonna label where our beef and our food comes from.” “There’s just no question on this one.” “It’s black and white.” USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins says she fully supports restoring Mandatory Country-of-Origin Labeling (MCOOL). Farm Action is encouraged to hear this, but now we need to turn those words into action. Thursday’s Farm Bill hearing showed promising movement toward restoring MCOOL, even though the overall bill did not advance out of committee. With bipartisan support building in Congress and Secretary Rollins fully backing MCOOL, we have a real opportunity to finally restore it. The momentum is there. Now Congress needs to get it done. Lonesome Lands Secretary Brooke Rollins

Farm Action

51,909 views • 7 days ago

The United States repealed the Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling law “If you buy meat from the store right now and it says ‘Product of the USA,’ it’s not.” Meat from anywhere in the world can be labeled a “Product of the USA” - We're importing 3.7-4.2 billion pounds of beef from other countries, not counting in the lamb and sheep industry - 75% of lamb and sheep sold in the United States is foreign The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) allows the “Product of USA” label on meat, poultry, or egg products if they are processed in the United States, regardless of where the animals were born, raised, or slaughtered. This means meat from animals imported from countries like Uruguay, Australia, or Canada can still be labeled “Product of USA” Canards and Mexico complained so the US changed our labeling law, ‘Canada and Mexico challenged this under the World Trade Organization (WTO), arguing it discriminated against their exports by favoring U.S. producers.’
0:44

The United States repealed the Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling law “If you buy meat from the store right now and it says ‘Product of the USA,’ it’s not.” Meat from anywhere in the world can be labeled a “Product of the USA” - We're importing 3.7-4.2 billion pounds of beef from other countries, not counting in the lamb and sheep industry - 75% of lamb and sheep sold in the United States is foreign The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) allows the “Product of USA” label on meat, poultry, or egg products if they are processed in the United States, regardless of where the animals were born, raised, or slaughtered. This means meat from animals imported from countries like Uruguay, Australia, or Canada can still be labeled “Product of USA” Canards and Mexico complained so the US changed our labeling law, ‘Canada and Mexico challenged this under the World Trade Organization (WTO), arguing it discriminated against their exports by favoring U.S. producers.’

Wall Street Apes

47,777 views • 9 months ago

Farm Action’s Joe Maxwell just went to Washington and sounded the alarm: America’s ranchers are in “CRISIS.” “We cannot afford a food supply where foreign beef fills the gap while American ranchers go out of business.” And he named the first step that the Trump Administration can take to reverse this crisis: “Reinstating Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling for beef and pork must be a top U.S. priority in the 2026 USMCA review.” “This is urgent regarding our food security, the survival of independent ranchers, and the long-term stability of North America’s beef supply.” “USDA reports that the U.S. beef cow herd has fallen to its smallest level in over 70 years.” “Ranchers tell us the same thing across the country. They cannot justify rebuilding their herds because the market does not reward U.S. origin.” “Tyson just closed a beef plant in Lexington, Nebraska, and is scaling back a plant in Amarillo, Texas.” “These moves impact 4,900 jobs.” “At the same time, beef imports are rising to record levels, over 4.5 million pounds last year.” “That combination—a shrinking domestic herd and rising imports—is a dangerous trajectory for America’s food security and rural economy.” “Reinstating MCOOL would give ranchers the most important thing they lack today: a reliable and forceful market signal that U.S.-raised beef will be recognized and rewarded.” “Reinstating MCOOL would allow consumers to choose U.S.-raised beef and ensure that choice benefits U.S. ranchers, give producers the confidence to reinvest in multi-year herd expansion, strengthen rural economies by keeping food dollars local, and build a more resilient domestic supply.” “The United States cannot afford a cattle industry at its smallest level in 70 years.” “MCOOL is essential for rebuilding the herd, restoring fairness, and protecting our food security.”
5:04

Farm Action’s Joe Maxwell just went to Washington and sounded the alarm: America’s ranchers are in “CRISIS.” “We cannot afford a food supply where foreign beef fills the gap while American ranchers go out of business.” And he named the first step that the Trump Administration can take to reverse this crisis: “Reinstating Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling for beef and pork must be a top U.S. priority in the 2026 USMCA review.” “This is urgent regarding our food security, the survival of independent ranchers, and the long-term stability of North America’s beef supply.” “USDA reports that the U.S. beef cow herd has fallen to its smallest level in over 70 years.” “Ranchers tell us the same thing across the country. They cannot justify rebuilding their herds because the market does not reward U.S. origin.” “Tyson just closed a beef plant in Lexington, Nebraska, and is scaling back a plant in Amarillo, Texas.” “These moves impact 4,900 jobs.” “At the same time, beef imports are rising to record levels, over 4.5 million pounds last year.” “That combination—a shrinking domestic herd and rising imports—is a dangerous trajectory for America’s food security and rural economy.” “Reinstating MCOOL would give ranchers the most important thing they lack today: a reliable and forceful market signal that U.S.-raised beef will be recognized and rewarded.” “Reinstating MCOOL would allow consumers to choose U.S.-raised beef and ensure that choice benefits U.S. ranchers, give producers the confidence to reinvest in multi-year herd expansion, strengthen rural economies by keeping food dollars local, and build a more resilient domestic supply.” “The United States cannot afford a cattle industry at its smallest level in 70 years.” “MCOOL is essential for rebuilding the herd, restoring fairness, and protecting our food security.”

Farm Action

13,204 views • 8 months ago

Mandatory Country Of Origin Labeling on beef was rescinded in 2015, and since that time, American shelves have been flooded with beef labeled "Product of the USA," despite the fact that it was from animals born, raised and slaughtered overseas. It appears that after the first of this coming year, "Product of USA" will once again mean that the animals were born, raised and slaughtered in the United States of America. Unfortunately, this is not a mandatory ruling, so no country of origin is required to be put on the label. It is our hope that this small change will once again allow American farmers to differentiate domestic product from imported product.
1:15

Mandatory Country Of Origin Labeling on beef was rescinded in 2015, and since that time, American shelves have been flooded with beef labeled "Product of the USA," despite the fact that it was from animals born, raised and slaughtered overseas. It appears that after the first of this coming year, "Product of USA" will once again mean that the animals were born, raised and slaughtered in the United States of America. Unfortunately, this is not a mandatory ruling, so no country of origin is required to be put on the label. It is our hope that this small change will once again allow American farmers to differentiate domestic product from imported product.

White Oak Pastures

17,887 views • 7 months ago

Senator Cory Booker just exposed how massive food lobbyists are abusing federal programs to steal money from independent farmers. Then, they use that money to entrench their monopoly power at the expense of independent farmers. “I cannot tell you how much the checkoff program pisses me off.” “They’re making American cattlemen and women pay money into the group that then uses it to hurt their industry.” Farm Action’s Joe Maxwell revealed that “almost 70%” of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association budget comes from these checkoff funds. And he named one key reform that Congress can pass to fight back on behalf of independent farmers: “One of the best ways to stabilize the market for domestic production is to restore Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling for beef.” “Those cowboy hats that walk this hall for NCBA will oppose it, not because it’s in the best interest of the cattle producers of the United States to oppose it, [but] because it’s in the best interest of the meat packers.” Sen. Cory Booker
2:03

Senator Cory Booker just exposed how massive food lobbyists are abusing federal programs to steal money from independent farmers. Then, they use that money to entrench their monopoly power at the expense of independent farmers. “I cannot tell you how much the checkoff program pisses me off.” “They’re making American cattlemen and women pay money into the group that then uses it to hurt their industry.” Farm Action’s Joe Maxwell revealed that “almost 70%” of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association budget comes from these checkoff funds. And he named one key reform that Congress can pass to fight back on behalf of independent farmers: “One of the best ways to stabilize the market for domestic production is to restore Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling for beef.” “Those cowboy hats that walk this hall for NCBA will oppose it, not because it’s in the best interest of the cattle producers of the United States to oppose it, [but] because it’s in the best interest of the meat packers.” Sen. Cory Booker

Farm Action

16,346 views • 5 months ago

Watch Beaver Stockyards hold up a piece of American beef and tell you what your grocery store won’t. $1.1 billion. That’s what Mexico invested in new packing and slaughter capacity after the border closed. Facilities. Infrastructure. Processing jobs. Value-added production — all of it now south of the border. Meanwhile the US herd sits at a 75-year low. Independent feeders are idling. And boxed beef is crossing back north with no country of origin label — because Mandatory COOL was gutted in 2016 and nobody in Washington has put it back. You’re paying record prices. You don’t know what you’re buying. And the ranchers actually raising American beef are getting squeezed from every direction. The consolidated packers don’t care where it comes from. Cheaper global supply is the whole business model. That’s JBS’s world — not ours. US beef imports are projected to hit 5.5 billion pounds in 2026. Record territory. This is exactly what we’re building for. Provenance settled at the ranch. You know the rancher. You know the animal. No opacity. No guessing. Country of origin labeling is the floor. Not the ceiling. Eat beef, keep slim. Just know where it’s coming from. Beaver County Stockyards Satoshi
0:57

Watch Beaver Stockyards hold up a piece of American beef and tell you what your grocery store won’t. $1.1 billion. That’s what Mexico invested in new packing and slaughter capacity after the border closed. Facilities. Infrastructure. Processing jobs. Value-added production — all of it now south of the border. Meanwhile the US herd sits at a 75-year low. Independent feeders are idling. And boxed beef is crossing back north with no country of origin label — because Mandatory COOL was gutted in 2016 and nobody in Washington has put it back. You’re paying record prices. You don’t know what you’re buying. And the ranchers actually raising American beef are getting squeezed from every direction. The consolidated packers don’t care where it comes from. Cheaper global supply is the whole business model. That’s JBS’s world — not ours. US beef imports are projected to hit 5.5 billion pounds in 2026. Record territory. This is exactly what we’re building for. Provenance settled at the ranch. You know the rancher. You know the animal. No opacity. No guessing. Country of origin labeling is the floor. Not the ceiling. Eat beef, keep slim. Just know where it’s coming from. Beaver County Stockyards Satoshi

Texas Slim™

95,914 views • 5 months ago

USDA Allows 'Product of USA' Labels On Grass Fed Beef That Never Lived On American Soil. Almost 90% Of American Market Grass Fed Beef Is Imported From 20+ Foreign Countries. Once The Foreign Meat Enters The US, Repackaging It Makes It 'Legal' To Qualify As A 'Product Of USA.' The elimination of country of origin labeling for meat caused American producers’ share of the grass fed cattle market to decline from 60% to less than 15% in just a few years. In 2015, the Obama administration’s USDA rolled back Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) for beef & pork products, allowing meat to be sold without disclosing what country it came from, on the label. Under current rules, beef & pork products that are shipped to the United States can be labeled “product of U.S.A.,” even when the animal was raised on another continent. A steer that is born, raised & processed in Uruguay can be cut into steaks or ground up & repackaged at a meatpacking plant in Colorado & is labeled as American meat—even when it isn’t. "The very idea of labeling beef in a grocery store ‘product of U.S.A.,’ when the animal never drew a breath of air on this continent, is just horrible,” says Will Harris, owner of White Oak Pastures, which produces its branded line of grass-fed beef in Bluffton, Georgia." "I don’t begrudge importers or producers from other countries selling to knowing consumers that want to buy that imported product. But I’m appalled at what the deception has done to the economies of our ranchers." Imported grass fed beef brands are taking advantage of a legal ambiguity—& some are downright deceptive. 3 powerful meatpackers...JBS, Tyson & Cargill, are deceptively using the law that allows use of the “Product of USA” label even when the beef & pork was born, raised & processed in a foreign country. Once the meat enters the U.S. it undergoes repackaging or what the USDA refers to as 'value added.' 'Value Added' is a loophole term that if the foreign beef & pork has been sliced, cut, ground or repackaged on American soil, then it is legally labeled as 'product of the USA.' Now, more than ever, it is crucial for our health & in support of American farmers & ranchers...to buy local, to purchase from small reputable butcher shops & to order from online grass fed beef shipping ranchers. 👇USDA Food Labeling Policy Book👇 👇Foreign Meat Contamination Found In US👇 👇Imported Beef Found To Be Contaminated👇 Speakers: Will & Jenni Harris of White Oak Pastures Video: Investearnsave Podcast: Joe Rogan
1:07

USDA Allows 'Product of USA' Labels On Grass Fed Beef That Never Lived On American Soil. Almost 90% Of American Market Grass Fed Beef Is Imported From 20+ Foreign Countries. Once The Foreign Meat Enters The US, Repackaging It Makes It 'Legal' To Qualify As A 'Product Of USA.' The elimination of country of origin labeling for meat caused American producers’ share of the grass fed cattle market to decline from 60% to less than 15% in just a few years. In 2015, the Obama administration’s USDA rolled back Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) for beef & pork products, allowing meat to be sold without disclosing what country it came from, on the label. Under current rules, beef & pork products that are shipped to the United States can be labeled “product of U.S.A.,” even when the animal was raised on another continent. A steer that is born, raised & processed in Uruguay can be cut into steaks or ground up & repackaged at a meatpacking plant in Colorado & is labeled as American meat—even when it isn’t. "The very idea of labeling beef in a grocery store ‘product of U.S.A.,’ when the animal never drew a breath of air on this continent, is just horrible,” says Will Harris, owner of White Oak Pastures, which produces its branded line of grass-fed beef in Bluffton, Georgia." "I don’t begrudge importers or producers from other countries selling to knowing consumers that want to buy that imported product. But I’m appalled at what the deception has done to the economies of our ranchers." Imported grass fed beef brands are taking advantage of a legal ambiguity—& some are downright deceptive. 3 powerful meatpackers...JBS, Tyson & Cargill, are deceptively using the law that allows use of the “Product of USA” label even when the beef & pork was born, raised & processed in a foreign country. Once the meat enters the U.S. it undergoes repackaging or what the USDA refers to as 'value added.' 'Value Added' is a loophole term that if the foreign beef & pork has been sliced, cut, ground or repackaged on American soil, then it is legally labeled as 'product of the USA.' Now, more than ever, it is crucial for our health & in support of American farmers & ranchers...to buy local, to purchase from small reputable butcher shops & to order from online grass fed beef shipping ranchers. 👇USDA Food Labeling Policy Book👇 👇Foreign Meat Contamination Found In US👇 👇Imported Beef Found To Be Contaminated👇 Speakers: Will & Jenni Harris of White Oak Pastures Video: Investearnsave Podcast: Joe Rogan

Valerie Anne Smith

231,219 views • 10 months ago

American Ranchers Are Desperately Trying To Educate The American People That They Are Being Replaced By Foreign Imports Thanks To Lobbyists Selling Them Out Legally a “Product of the USA can now be imported from overseas — The US cattle industry is at an all time low” “There's some interesting and concerning stuff happening in the US cattle industry. Did you know meat is being imported into the US from overseas and being marketed as a product of the USA? The US cattle industry is at an all time low. It's a result of things like extreme drought, beef cost rising, and inflation. Cattle prices are at an all time high, which drives the price of beef. But this isn't necessarily a good thing for ranchers. This just means the 4 large corporations who control 85 percent of the US beef market, 2 of them Brazilian owned, will import meat from other countries where they can source it cheaper. And because of our own laws, if it is repackaged in any way, it can be labeled product of the USA. This is especially unsettling for ground beef that can come from multiple countries, from different ages, and different breeds of older cows that any sort of untraceable diet. That shrimp can be frozen for who knows how long and imported in droves, then thawed and mixed in a large vat in a large processing plant with literally hundreds of different DNA samples landing in 1 pound of ground beef. Importing and exporting is not the problem. Americans like their hamburger, but not their heart. Traditional export markets are good for ranchers to get a premium for the unusual cuts that are more widely desired in foreign markets. But the American consumer deserves to know where their meat comes from and how it was raised. And there is an answer. Buy directly from a rancher in the USA. Find a ranch you can buy direct from locally or one who ships to your doorstep and start ordering now and trusting the source of the food you feed your family.”
1:27

American Ranchers Are Desperately Trying To Educate The American People That They Are Being Replaced By Foreign Imports Thanks To Lobbyists Selling Them Out Legally a “Product of the USA can now be imported from overseas — The US cattle industry is at an all time low” “There's some interesting and concerning stuff happening in the US cattle industry. Did you know meat is being imported into the US from overseas and being marketed as a product of the USA? The US cattle industry is at an all time low. It's a result of things like extreme drought, beef cost rising, and inflation. Cattle prices are at an all time high, which drives the price of beef. But this isn't necessarily a good thing for ranchers. This just means the 4 large corporations who control 85 percent of the US beef market, 2 of them Brazilian owned, will import meat from other countries where they can source it cheaper. And because of our own laws, if it is repackaged in any way, it can be labeled product of the USA. This is especially unsettling for ground beef that can come from multiple countries, from different ages, and different breeds of older cows that any sort of untraceable diet. That shrimp can be frozen for who knows how long and imported in droves, then thawed and mixed in a large vat in a large processing plant with literally hundreds of different DNA samples landing in 1 pound of ground beef. Importing and exporting is not the problem. Americans like their hamburger, but not their heart. Traditional export markets are good for ranchers to get a premium for the unusual cuts that are more widely desired in foreign markets. But the American consumer deserves to know where their meat comes from and how it was raised. And there is an answer. Buy directly from a rancher in the USA. Find a ranch you can buy direct from locally or one who ships to your doorstep and start ordering now and trusting the source of the food you feed your family.”

Wall Street Apes

365,332 views • 2 years ago

🚨We have a RARE chance to secure a huge win for America’s farmers right now—here’s how: In 2015, Congress repealed Country of Origin Labeling for beef and pork. Thomas Massie EXPOSED this as a globalist “trick” on the American people. “Those are the GLOBALISTS at work trying to make sure that they can sell you a substandard product from Canada or Mexico or China and slap a label on it that says USDA and trick consumers into thinking that means USA.” Now, U.S. trade officials are reviewing a major trade deal with Mexico and Canada—and this review could RESTORE Country of Origin Labeling between our three countries. We The People have a chance to make our voices heard and demand this common sense, America First reform. Farm Action put together a step-by-step guide on how you can send a message urging the U.S. Trade Representative to RESTORE Country of Origin Labeling. Use the link below to make your voice heard!👇
1:15

🚨We have a RARE chance to secure a huge win for America’s farmers right now—here’s how: In 2015, Congress repealed Country of Origin Labeling for beef and pork. Thomas Massie EXPOSED this as a globalist “trick” on the American people. “Those are the GLOBALISTS at work trying to make sure that they can sell you a substandard product from Canada or Mexico or China and slap a label on it that says USDA and trick consumers into thinking that means USA.” Now, U.S. trade officials are reviewing a major trade deal with Mexico and Canada—and this review could RESTORE Country of Origin Labeling between our three countries. We The People have a chance to make our voices heard and demand this common sense, America First reform. Farm Action put together a step-by-step guide on how you can send a message urging the U.S. Trade Representative to RESTORE Country of Origin Labeling. Use the link below to make your voice heard!👇

Farm Action

36,673 views • 9 months ago

The Nigerian government is sending people in Lagos back to their State of Origin. Let that sink in. They are dividing their own people, treating them as foreigners within their own country. This is not a policy of unity, it is a policy of exclusion. It is a testament to the deep-seated tribalism that has plagued Nigeria since independence. The Igbo, the Hausa, the Yoruba they cannot live together. They don’t trust each other, they don’t love each other. They cannot build a nation. This is why Nigeria will never be great, despite its immense potential. They have resources. They have the people. But they are divided by tribe, by religion, by region. They hate each other within their own country, and they refuse to confront this hatred. They would rather send people back to their "State of Origin" than build a nation where everyone belongs. This is not leadership, it is surrender. And until they confront this reality, Nigeria will remain a country of potential, not of progress. ✊🏾
4:59

The Nigerian government is sending people in Lagos back to their State of Origin. Let that sink in. They are dividing their own people, treating them as foreigners within their own country. This is not a policy of unity, it is a policy of exclusion. It is a testament to the deep-seated tribalism that has plagued Nigeria since independence. The Igbo, the Hausa, the Yoruba they cannot live together. They don’t trust each other, they don’t love each other. They cannot build a nation. This is why Nigeria will never be great, despite its immense potential. They have resources. They have the people. But they are divided by tribe, by religion, by region. They hate each other within their own country, and they refuse to confront this hatred. They would rather send people back to their "State of Origin" than build a nation where everyone belongs. This is not leadership, it is surrender. And until they confront this reality, Nigeria will remain a country of potential, not of progress. ✊🏾

Musa Ronalds

61,451 views • 1 month ago

Beef Checkoff: Rigged💲 || Post No. 1 There is an Unholy Trinity of Middlers who stand between the Farmers and Ranchers on the one side and Big Ag on the other. It’s my opinion that the Middlers have done more harm to the Farmers and Ranchers than Big Ag ever could — because they are on the inside playing the Farmer for a fool. I harp relentlessly on the first two of the Unholy Trinity: Farm Credit + Farm Bureau. But there is a third amongst them and it’s the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association or the NCBA; and we start taking a look at them tonight. Meet my friend Fred Stokes — a hero to cattle producers and a man of integrity. More to come.
5:28

Beef Checkoff: Rigged💲 || Post No. 1 There is an Unholy Trinity of Middlers who stand between the Farmers and Ranchers on the one side and Big Ag on the other. It’s my opinion that the Middlers have done more harm to the Farmers and Ranchers than Big Ag ever could — because they are on the inside playing the Farmer for a fool. I harp relentlessly on the first two of the Unholy Trinity: Farm Credit + Farm Bureau. But there is a third amongst them and it’s the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association or the NCBA; and we start taking a look at them tonight. Meet my friend Fred Stokes — a hero to cattle producers and a man of integrity. More to come.

Dustin Kittle

35,541 views • 1 year ago

“The variation from N90 billion, they are proposing N532 billion, I will not accept it. The option I have is to cancel the contract. From N90 billion to N532 billion within a space of two years, to do second runway, I will not accept it.” - The Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Mr. Festus Keyamo, has stated that the Federal Government will not agree to the contractors' request for a N532 billion adjustment to the contract for the second runway at Abuja International Airport.
2:09

“The variation from N90 billion, they are proposing N532 billion, I will not accept it. The option I have is to cancel the contract. From N90 billion to N532 billion within a space of two years, to do second runway, I will not accept it.” - The Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Mr. Festus Keyamo, has stated that the Federal Government will not agree to the contractors' request for a N532 billion adjustment to the contract for the second runway at Abuja International Airport.

Imran Muhammad

157,560 views • 1 year ago

7 confirmed cases of screwworm. Yesterday it was 5. The day before, 3. Two states. All originating from cartel-controlled ranches south of the border. has been tracking cartel cattle corridors for over a year. Now screwworm is in Texas. The parasite moved through the same routes the cattle did. InSight Crime confirmed it: outbreak hotspots mirror the smuggling routes. 800,000 head a year smuggled through Mexico with falsified paperwork, no quarantine, no traceability. CJNG doesn't just extort ranchers — they charge 5 pesos per kilo on export animals. They access live herd data through RFID tags. They run regional managers embedded in Mexico's legal export system. Cattle bought for $650 in Central America, resold for $1,500 in Texas. A $1.2 billion shadow market. The parasite isn't the only thing hiding in plain sight. The "Product of USA" rule changed in January. Packers can now only use that label if the animal was born, raised, harvested, AND processed in the US. The old loophole where imported beef got stamped "Product of USA" just for being processed here? Gone. But it's still voluntary. Packers don't have to tell you anything. They can just leave the label off. Imported beef from cartel corridors can sit in your grocery store with zero origin disclosure. MCOOL — mandatory country of origin labeling — would fix that. Every cut, labeled. Born where. Raised where. Slaughtered where. No exceptions. H.R. 5818 is sitting in Congress right now. The screwworm made this urgent. The cartel corridors made it obvious.
1:26

7 confirmed cases of screwworm. Yesterday it was 5. The day before, 3. Two states. All originating from cartel-controlled ranches south of the border. has been tracking cartel cattle corridors for over a year. Now screwworm is in Texas. The parasite moved through the same routes the cattle did. InSight Crime confirmed it: outbreak hotspots mirror the smuggling routes. 800,000 head a year smuggled through Mexico with falsified paperwork, no quarantine, no traceability. CJNG doesn't just extort ranchers — they charge 5 pesos per kilo on export animals. They access live herd data through RFID tags. They run regional managers embedded in Mexico's legal export system. Cattle bought for $650 in Central America, resold for $1,500 in Texas. A $1.2 billion shadow market. The parasite isn't the only thing hiding in plain sight. The "Product of USA" rule changed in January. Packers can now only use that label if the animal was born, raised, harvested, AND processed in the US. The old loophole where imported beef got stamped "Product of USA" just for being processed here? Gone. But it's still voluntary. Packers don't have to tell you anything. They can just leave the label off. Imported beef from cartel corridors can sit in your grocery store with zero origin disclosure. MCOOL — mandatory country of origin labeling — would fix that. Every cut, labeled. Born where. Raised where. Slaughtered where. No exceptions. H.R. 5818 is sitting in Congress right now. The screwworm made this urgent. The cartel corridors made it obvious.

Beef Support | BeefMaps.com

29,613 views • 2 months ago

American rancher explains why Walmart and large retailer hamburger is cheaper “Why is the hamburger so much cheaper to Walmart or a big box store? They mix a lot of trim, the trimmings from other meats, other beefs from Brazil or other countries. They'll bring that in. That stuff comes in at $2 a pound or less. And they grind it with the American hamburger. Call it all American. I don't think they have to put that in the label and sell it as American hamburger.” They don’t. Under current U.S. regulations as of 2026, retailers and suppliers do not have to label ground beef (including hamburger) with country of origin information, even if it includes trimmings or meat imported from other countries like Brazil.
0:20

American rancher explains why Walmart and large retailer hamburger is cheaper “Why is the hamburger so much cheaper to Walmart or a big box store? They mix a lot of trim, the trimmings from other meats, other beefs from Brazil or other countries. They'll bring that in. That stuff comes in at $2 a pound or less. And they grind it with the American hamburger. Call it all American. I don't think they have to put that in the label and sell it as American hamburger.” They don’t. Under current U.S. regulations as of 2026, retailers and suppliers do not have to label ground beef (including hamburger) with country of origin information, even if it includes trimmings or meat imported from other countries like Brazil.

Wall Street Apes

133,427 views • 6 months ago

I’ve Been Blowing The Whistle On This For Months, The Electronic Ear Tag For Cattle Bill VERY IMPORTANT 🚨 Not only do American farmers say this could put ALL small family farms out of business but Rep Thomas Massie says this is the first step to BANNING cattle - “The key that opens the door to end to the end of independent producers across the country” - The mandatory electronic identification ear tag bill would allow government & environmental groups who attribute livestock to climate change to receive information on small farms cattle - Smaller operations will struggle to shoulder the cost and infrastructure to maintain these systems - Said by farmers I’ve shared “A Trojan horse to get in and control the small farmer. It’s meant to come in, put the small farmer out of business - The rule would increase marketing costs because whenever an animal is sold, it would have to be traced and recorded “Well, you know, the left wants to ban cattle. And before you can ban anything, you need a registry. You need to know where it's at and who owns it, and that's why they want to tag cattle. We've seen it happen in Europe. Now on the right, you've got some cronies who stand to make some money from these ear tags. They're the ones who get the $15,000,000, uh, earmark. It doesn't go to USDA. It's going to, quote, stakeholders. That is a code word for private entities are getting a handout. And, um, what they'll do, they'll verticalize the industry with this. The big corporations, you know, you just talked about China. There are 4 corporations control meat processing in United States. One's owned by China. One's owned Brazil by Brazil. American ranchers will be working for those organizations if this tracking goes through because they'll verticalize the industry. —What's your response to this tracking of cattle? Are you concerned as well? Oh, yes. I am. It is, the key that opens the door to end to the end of independent producers across the country, and it is a pro a private property rights issue that, uh, we really have to consider here. When we start talking about RFID, EID, and data monitor monitoring of farmers and ranchers and their cattle herd size, we open up to what the door to what is going on in the European Union. And, under the rules of sustainable development, we know that the RFID, has led to a land seizure in the name of climate change. So once we open that door, there's no going back. And, uh, they can come and they can monitor, measure, report, and verify everything that's going on your on your farm or ranch. And then it's maybe down the road in the name of climate change, they can come and, uh, uh, dictate to you the rules of their production, which are subjective on a from a third party verification, and it is extremely dangerous to private property rights. This is a liberty taker, not a liberty maker.” Congressman Thomas Massie posted on “Hidden in this week’s Omnibus: Lobbyists got $15 million dollars to implement ELECTRONIC TAGGING of all cattle in the US. No law authorizes this! It will be used by the GREEN agenda to limit beef production, and by the corporate meat oligopoly to DOMINATE small ranchers. Massie, who sponsored the PRIME Act (which would allow meat from custom exempt slaughter plants to be marketed in some instances) shared the language, apparently directly from the omnibus bill: “The agreement directs the Department to continue to provide the tags and related infrastructure needed to comply with the Federal Animal Disease Traceability rule (9 CFR 86), including no less than $15,000,000 for electronic identification (EID) tags and related infrastructure needed for stakeholders to comply with the proposed rule. “Use of Electronic identification Eartags as Official Identification in Cattle and Bison.” (88 FR 3320), should that rule be finalized.
1:59

I’ve Been Blowing The Whistle On This For Months, The Electronic Ear Tag For Cattle Bill VERY IMPORTANT 🚨 Not only do American farmers say this could put ALL small family farms out of business but Rep Thomas Massie says this is the first step to BANNING cattle - “The key that opens the door to end to the end of independent producers across the country” - The mandatory electronic identification ear tag bill would allow government & environmental groups who attribute livestock to climate change to receive information on small farms cattle - Smaller operations will struggle to shoulder the cost and infrastructure to maintain these systems - Said by farmers I’ve shared “A Trojan horse to get in and control the small farmer. It’s meant to come in, put the small farmer out of business - The rule would increase marketing costs because whenever an animal is sold, it would have to be traced and recorded “Well, you know, the left wants to ban cattle. And before you can ban anything, you need a registry. You need to know where it's at and who owns it, and that's why they want to tag cattle. We've seen it happen in Europe. Now on the right, you've got some cronies who stand to make some money from these ear tags. They're the ones who get the $15,000,000, uh, earmark. It doesn't go to USDA. It's going to, quote, stakeholders. That is a code word for private entities are getting a handout. And, um, what they'll do, they'll verticalize the industry with this. The big corporations, you know, you just talked about China. There are 4 corporations control meat processing in United States. One's owned by China. One's owned Brazil by Brazil. American ranchers will be working for those organizations if this tracking goes through because they'll verticalize the industry. —What's your response to this tracking of cattle? Are you concerned as well? Oh, yes. I am. It is, the key that opens the door to end to the end of independent producers across the country, and it is a pro a private property rights issue that, uh, we really have to consider here. When we start talking about RFID, EID, and data monitor monitoring of farmers and ranchers and their cattle herd size, we open up to what the door to what is going on in the European Union. And, under the rules of sustainable development, we know that the RFID, has led to a land seizure in the name of climate change. So once we open that door, there's no going back. And, uh, they can come and they can monitor, measure, report, and verify everything that's going on your on your farm or ranch. And then it's maybe down the road in the name of climate change, they can come and, uh, uh, dictate to you the rules of their production, which are subjective on a from a third party verification, and it is extremely dangerous to private property rights. This is a liberty taker, not a liberty maker.” Congressman Thomas Massie posted on “Hidden in this week’s Omnibus: Lobbyists got $15 million dollars to implement ELECTRONIC TAGGING of all cattle in the US. No law authorizes this! It will be used by the GREEN agenda to limit beef production, and by the corporate meat oligopoly to DOMINATE small ranchers. Massie, who sponsored the PRIME Act (which would allow meat from custom exempt slaughter plants to be marketed in some instances) shared the language, apparently directly from the omnibus bill: “The agreement directs the Department to continue to provide the tags and related infrastructure needed to comply with the Federal Animal Disease Traceability rule (9 CFR 86), including no less than $15,000,000 for electronic identification (EID) tags and related infrastructure needed for stakeholders to comply with the proposed rule. “Use of Electronic identification Eartags as Official Identification in Cattle and Bison.” (88 FR 3320), should that rule be finalized.

Wall Street Apes

323,230 views • 2 years ago

Elon Musk: Unfettered mass immigration will lead to the destruction of any country that allows it. “At the end of the day, it is a numbers game, a number situation. If there are 8 billion people in the world and let's say you're a country of, you know, 50 million, 60 million for a medium-sized country, but even for a country like the United States, which is 350 million, given that there are 8 billion people in the world, it only takes a few percent of the rest of the world to move to the country to where it is no longer that country. A country is not its geography. A country is its people. This is a fundamental concept that should be obvious. And if you took the people of Italy and you teleported the people of Italy to, say, some part of the United States, it would still be Italy. But if you teleported a bunch of people from some other part of the world to Italy, where the Italian people no longer be because they've been teleported to America, then the geographic region would no longer be Italy. It would be that other country. A country is its people, not its geography.” Source: Elon Musk at Lega Congress, April 5, 2025
1:13

Elon Musk: Unfettered mass immigration will lead to the destruction of any country that allows it. “At the end of the day, it is a numbers game, a number situation. If there are 8 billion people in the world and let's say you're a country of, you know, 50 million, 60 million for a medium-sized country, but even for a country like the United States, which is 350 million, given that there are 8 billion people in the world, it only takes a few percent of the rest of the world to move to the country to where it is no longer that country. A country is not its geography. A country is its people. This is a fundamental concept that should be obvious. And if you took the people of Italy and you teleported the people of Italy to, say, some part of the United States, it would still be Italy. But if you teleported a bunch of people from some other part of the world to Italy, where the Italian people no longer be because they've been teleported to America, then the geographic region would no longer be Italy. It would be that other country. A country is its people, not its geography.” Source: Elon Musk at Lega Congress, April 5, 2025

ELON CLIPS

34,707 views • 2 months ago

They want a Europe of subsidies; a Europe of socialist restrictions; a Europe of protectionism. They want it because that's how they would like to run—or is it to ruin—this country. Every time we have stood up and fought for Britain and British interests, the frontbench opposite have carped, criticised and moaned. On the central issues of Europe's future, they will not tell us where they stand. Do they want a single currency? The right hon. gentleman does not even know what it means or the consequences of it. Are they prepared to defend the rights of the United Kingdom Parliament? No, for all that the right hon. gentleman said. For them it's all compromise, "sweep it under the carpet”, “leave it for another day and it might sort itself out”, in the hope that the people of Britain will not notice what is happening to them, and how the powers would be gradually slipping away.
2:15

They want a Europe of subsidies; a Europe of socialist restrictions; a Europe of protectionism. They want it because that's how they would like to run—or is it to ruin—this country. Every time we have stood up and fought for Britain and British interests, the frontbench opposite have carped, criticised and moaned. On the central issues of Europe's future, they will not tell us where they stand. Do they want a single currency? The right hon. gentleman does not even know what it means or the consequences of it. Are they prepared to defend the rights of the United Kingdom Parliament? No, for all that the right hon. gentleman said. For them it's all compromise, "sweep it under the carpet”, “leave it for another day and it might sort itself out”, in the hope that the people of Britain will not notice what is happening to them, and how the powers would be gradually slipping away.

Margaret Thatcher

25,044 views • 1 year ago

Friends, in our first reading from the book of Deuteronomy this week, Moses says to the people, “For this command that I enjoin on you today is not too mysterious and remote for you. . . . No, it is something very near to you, already in your mouths and in your hearts; you have only to carry it out.” This is a master text for what we call in the Catholic tradition “the natural law.” It means that there is within us a kind of deep moral intuition by which we know the right thing to do; there are intuitions of value that give us a sense of meaning, purpose, and direction in life.
14:31

Friends, in our first reading from the book of Deuteronomy this week, Moses says to the people, “For this command that I enjoin on you today is not too mysterious and remote for you. . . . No, it is something very near to you, already in your mouths and in your hearts; you have only to carry it out.” This is a master text for what we call in the Catholic tradition “the natural law.” It means that there is within us a kind of deep moral intuition by which we know the right thing to do; there are intuitions of value that give us a sense of meaning, purpose, and direction in life.

Bishop Robert Barron

28,866 views • 1 year ago

NTSB investigators have given an update on the deadly plane crash that claimed the life of NASCAR star Greg Biffle and six other people, including his children, on Thursday morning. At Saturday’s press conference, officials confirmed that they still do not know the cause of the crash. “We do not know the circumstances which led the aircraft… to attempt to return to the airport, but that is the focus of our investigation,” officials said. They also confirmed that a text reading “Emergency landing” was sent from someone on the plane. “I can confirm that the NTSB is aware of one brief text from a passenger on board the aircraft to a family member that read, and I quote, ‘Emergency landing.'” “We are not aware of any other communications from passengers on board the aircraft to those on the ground.” The NTSB also says that at this time, it does not know who the pilot of the plane was.
4:09

NTSB investigators have given an update on the deadly plane crash that claimed the life of NASCAR star Greg Biffle and six other people, including his children, on Thursday morning. At Saturday’s press conference, officials confirmed that they still do not know the cause of the crash. “We do not know the circumstances which led the aircraft… to attempt to return to the airport, but that is the focus of our investigation,” officials said. They also confirmed that a text reading “Emergency landing” was sent from someone on the plane. “I can confirm that the NTSB is aware of one brief text from a passenger on board the aircraft to a family member that read, and I quote, ‘Emergency landing.'” “We are not aware of any other communications from passengers on board the aircraft to those on the ground.” The NTSB also says that at this time, it does not know who the pilot of the plane was.

Breaking Aviation News & Videos

199,871 views • 8 months ago