正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

NET ZERO - Awkies for the narrative … The increase in C02, however that has occurred, has produced a 20% increase in global greening & a 13% global improvement in crop yields, with no additional fertiliser. Shh … thats bad for profit 🤡

97,131 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Rob 的头像
Rob1 年前

Unfortunately, CO2 levels and temperature rises, do not stop here. Even if we do net zero we still have decades more warming to come, and if we don't... UK suffered a 20% reduction in yields last year due to too much rain, this year?

Bernie 的头像
Bernie1 年前

Not as bad as the great famine of 1315 though eh?

Range ETFs 的头像
Range ETFs1 年前

Even as energy shifts, coal remains a critical player in industries from steel production to power generation. $COAL ETF targets companies globally. Capture coal’s potential lasting value with this ETF.

hid65 的头像
hid651 年前

Not to mention the ice caps are growing and sea levels never actually rose anywhere in the world

Tony Matthews 的头像
Tony Matthews1 年前

Have posted a few times, but worth repeating. CO2 levels on our planet are lower than the optimum level that plants need to thrive.

mike brown❌ 的头像
mike brown❌1 年前

Led by China and India. Funny that

ImBackBaby 的头像
ImBackBaby1 年前

Yup

Nick Gilbert 的头像
Nick Gilbert1 年前

Cynic....

Kier Jong Un 的头像
Kier Jong Un1 年前

And that 20% global greening will result in 20% more Oxygen being released by the plant life and 20% more CO2 being burnt up to produce the o2 and keep the carbon to build the plant. But Red Ed wants to spaff £22B in a machine to do what plants do for free. It’s a scam.

Kip 🐶🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇲🐶 的头像
Kip 🐶🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇲🐶1 年前

Same old yarn, always give it a wide berth when is states "Scientists say/have said" ... pull the other one and see if it gives less of a damn. And they never say who these scientists are? strange...

相关视频