Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Net Zero is not saving the planet. It is making Britain poorer, colder and weaker. China secures cheap energy for its people. Britain sabotages itself, destroys its industry and calls it virtue.

GreatBritishPAC's profile picture

Great British PAC

98,111 subscribers

12,188 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

You were told Net Zero would save the planet. Instead, it is making Britain poorer, colder, weaker and more dependent on China. Expensive energy kills. I sat down with Kathryn Porter to expose the cost of this madness. Live at 6pm 👉
1:08

You were told Net Zero would save the planet. Instead, it is making Britain poorer, colder, weaker and more dependent on China. Expensive energy kills. I sat down with Kathryn Porter to expose the cost of this madness. Live at 6pm 👉

Ben Habib

25,440 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Advance UK is launching its draft energy policy: a plan to scrap Net Zero, restore British energy sovereignty, cut bills, revive industry and put the interests of the British people first. Our energy policy will repeal Net Zero legislation, ditch damaging international frameworks, scrap punitive green taxes, support domestic oil, gas, coal, nuclear, hydro and shale where viable, and ensure Britain has cheap, abundant and reliable energy for decades to come. This policy is being released in draft form so that members and the wider public can scrutinise it, challenge it and help improve it ahead of the next general election. Britain cannot be sovereign if it cannot power itself.
35:41

Advance UK is launching its draft energy policy: a plan to scrap Net Zero, restore British energy sovereignty, cut bills, revive industry and put the interests of the British people first. Our energy policy will repeal Net Zero legislation, ditch damaging international frameworks, scrap punitive green taxes, support domestic oil, gas, coal, nuclear, hydro and shale where viable, and ensure Britain has cheap, abundant and reliable energy for decades to come. This policy is being released in draft form so that members and the wider public can scrutinise it, challenge it and help improve it ahead of the next general election. Britain cannot be sovereign if it cannot power itself.

Advance UK

46,530 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Labour’s Net Zero obsession is making Britain poorer. It’s now threatening our entire North Sea oil and gas industry. It’s a national emergency, and we’re the only Party with the backbone to get Britain drilling.
3:29

Labour’s Net Zero obsession is making Britain poorer. It’s now threatening our entire North Sea oil and gas industry. It’s a national emergency, and we’re the only Party with the backbone to get Britain drilling.

Conservatives

43,564 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Not only does China provide universal healthcare and housing to its people, but its also saving the planet by replacing plastics with biodegradable bamboo. China is the new leader of the free world and the planet is better off because of it.
0:32

Not only does China provide universal healthcare and housing to its people, but its also saving the planet by replacing plastics with biodegradable bamboo. China is the new leader of the free world and the planet is better off because of it.

Power to the People ☭🕊

16,361 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Net Zero is not an engineering policy. It is an ideology pretending to be one. Wind power is not clean, cheap or reliable. It is material-heavy, land-hungry and wildly inefficient compared with gas. Britain is dismantling reliable energy to worship at the altar of green delusion.
1:17

Net Zero is not an engineering policy. It is an ideology pretending to be one. Wind power is not clean, cheap or reliable. It is material-heavy, land-hungry and wildly inefficient compared with gas. Britain is dismantling reliable energy to worship at the altar of green delusion.

Advance UK

32,487 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

This is NOT racism, its not cruel, its not bigotry it is FACT and we MUST put the British people first. It’s simply not fair and our priority must be the survival, safety and wellbeing of our own people! Its as simple as that. Restore Britain
0:31

This is NOT racism, its not cruel, its not bigotry it is FACT and we MUST put the British people first. It’s simply not fair and our priority must be the survival, safety and wellbeing of our own people! Its as simple as that. Restore Britain

Orla Minihane

22,642 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Saving the planet by destroying it‼️ We need reliable, cheap, energy‼️ No to Net Zero! ❌ The Green Scam! 🚫
1:01

Saving the planet by destroying it‼️ We need reliable, cheap, energy‼️ No to Net Zero! ❌ The Green Scam! 🚫

katy 🌸

17,967 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

In just 8 years, China pumped out more carbon emissions than Britain has produced in 250 years. Net zero is wrecking our industry, and driving up our energy bills, but it's having zero impact on global climate. It's time to scrap Net Zero for good.
1:00

In just 8 years, China pumped out more carbon emissions than Britain has produced in 250 years. Net zero is wrecking our industry, and driving up our energy bills, but it's having zero impact on global climate. It's time to scrap Net Zero for good.

Katie Lam

194,115 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Britain has some of the most expensive energy in the world, it is killing jobs, driving inflation, and hollowing out whole regions. Net Zero is the culprit, and this government is complicit.
3:14

Britain has some of the most expensive energy in the world, it is killing jobs, driving inflation, and hollowing out whole regions. Net Zero is the culprit, and this government is complicit.

Great British PAC

22,009 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

ICA and its members’ decarbonization roadmap is here: Copper—The Pathway to Net Zero! Across the world, the shift to a carbon neutral planet has begun. Now, the industry that helps other sectors decarbonize is going net zero itself. Learn more. #NetZeroCopper 👇
2:18

ICA and its members’ decarbonization roadmap is here: Copper—The Pathway to Net Zero! Across the world, the shift to a carbon neutral planet has begun. Now, the industry that helps other sectors decarbonize is going net zero itself. Learn more. #NetZeroCopper 👇

International Copper Association

138,298 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

An absolute takedown of the whole Net Zero agenda by U.S. Energy Secretary Secretary Chris Wright. Britain is crying out for an energy secretary that is driven by rationality and not zealotry.
3:36

An absolute takedown of the whole Net Zero agenda by U.S. Energy Secretary Secretary Chris Wright. Britain is crying out for an energy secretary that is driven by rationality and not zealotry.

Net Zero Watch

41,192 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The left's obsession with Net Zero is keeping energy bills high. Today in the Commons I made the case for why Britain must drill for its own oil and gas. 👀Here's how I took apart their arguments...
16:20

The left's obsession with Net Zero is keeping energy bills high. Today in the Commons I made the case for why Britain must drill for its own oil and gas. 👀Here's how I took apart their arguments...

Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧

36,202 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Britain is not being governed for the British people. It is being governed for globalist agendas: net zero, open borders, mass migration, higher taxes and a welfare state that punishes work. The uniparty has not lost touch by accident. It has chosen this.
2:06

Britain is not being governed for the British people. It is being governed for globalist agendas: net zero, open borders, mass migration, higher taxes and a welfare state that punishes work. The uniparty has not lost touch by accident. It has chosen this.

Advance UK

62,228 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

'I don't think drilling for oil and gas is against net zero... All we're doing is saying we should produce it here.' Energy policy expert Tone Langengen reacts as Tony Blair calls on the Government to allow new oil and gas fields, against its current net zero agenda.
3:14

'I don't think drilling for oil and gas is against net zero... All we're doing is saying we should produce it here.' Energy policy expert Tone Langengen reacts as Tony Blair calls on the Government to allow new oil and gas fields, against its current net zero agenda.

GB News

16,205 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

'I wonder, can the steel industry or any heavy manufacturing now survive in Britain?' Nigel Farage responds to the potential nationalisation of steel, branding it 'sad' and blaming the decline of the industry on 'net zero policies' and China.
2:13

'I wonder, can the steel industry or any heavy manufacturing now survive in Britain?' Nigel Farage responds to the potential nationalisation of steel, branding it 'sad' and blaming the decline of the industry on 'net zero policies' and China.

GB News

61,642 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇪🇺🇭🇺 Orban industrializes Hungary! Orban: “Europe's major manufacturers, including Mercedes Benz, are warning Brussels. Without affordable energy, Europe’s automotive industry is at risk. With it, factories stay open, jobs are protected, and competitiveness survives. You can count on us. Hungary is doing its part to secure cheap energy for industry and households.” -> With cheap energy which Orban secures for Hungary, manufacturing can move there. Smart
1:20

🇪🇺🇭🇺 Orban industrializes Hungary! Orban: “Europe's major manufacturers, including Mercedes Benz, are warning Brussels. Without affordable energy, Europe’s automotive industry is at risk. With it, factories stay open, jobs are protected, and competitiveness survives. You can count on us. Hungary is doing its part to secure cheap energy for industry and households.” -> With cheap energy which Orban secures for Hungary, manufacturing can move there. Smart

Lord Bebo

12,523 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The EU has mastered one trick: When it wins, it calls it free trade. When China wins, it calls it overdependence. For decades, European cars, appliances, luxury goods, chemicals, machinery, and high-end consumer products entered the Chinese market. China did not cry that Europe was “distorting” its market or creating “dependency.” China competed. China learned. China upgraded. But the moment Chinese industries became competitive, Europe suddenly discovered “strategic risk.” Solar panels? Europe blocked and punished Chinese solar for years with tariffs and trade barriers. Did that revive Europe’s own solar industry? No. It only made Europe’s energy transition more expensive until it eventually had to reopen the door. Huawei and ZTE? Europe followed Washington’s pressure campaign, ripped out Chinese telecom infrastructure it had already deployed, spent more money, delayed its own networks, and called that “security.” Energy? Europe chose geopolitical obedience, cut itself off from cheap Russian energy, raised its own industrial costs, became more dependent on the U.S., and then watched its companies move across the Atlantic under American subsidies and tariffs. But somehow the problem is still China. Please. Europe’s crisis was not created by Chinese overcapacity. It was created by European complacency, American dependency, ideological industrial policy, expensive energy, and decades of mistaking moral lectures for competitiveness. Now Chinese industries are faster, cheaper, more integrated, and more efficient — from EVs to batteries, solar, electronics, ports, logistics, and manufacturing ecosystems. So Europe invents new language: “Diversification.” “De-risking.” “Overdependence.” “Fair competition.” But strip away the diplomatic costume, and it is just protectionism with Brussels paperwork. China did not force Europe to deindustrialize itself. Europe made its choices. It followed Washington. It sanctioned its own energy base. It taxed its own consumers. It slowed its own innovation. It lectured China while China built. And now it wants China to pay for Europe’s failure to compete. No. China-EU trade is not a charity program for declining European industries. If Europe wants competitiveness, it should build it. Not rename protectionism as “diversification” and expect China to applaud.
2:07

The EU has mastered one trick: When it wins, it calls it free trade. When China wins, it calls it overdependence. For decades, European cars, appliances, luxury goods, chemicals, machinery, and high-end consumer products entered the Chinese market. China did not cry that Europe was “distorting” its market or creating “dependency.” China competed. China learned. China upgraded. But the moment Chinese industries became competitive, Europe suddenly discovered “strategic risk.” Solar panels? Europe blocked and punished Chinese solar for years with tariffs and trade barriers. Did that revive Europe’s own solar industry? No. It only made Europe’s energy transition more expensive until it eventually had to reopen the door. Huawei and ZTE? Europe followed Washington’s pressure campaign, ripped out Chinese telecom infrastructure it had already deployed, spent more money, delayed its own networks, and called that “security.” Energy? Europe chose geopolitical obedience, cut itself off from cheap Russian energy, raised its own industrial costs, became more dependent on the U.S., and then watched its companies move across the Atlantic under American subsidies and tariffs. But somehow the problem is still China. Please. Europe’s crisis was not created by Chinese overcapacity. It was created by European complacency, American dependency, ideological industrial policy, expensive energy, and decades of mistaking moral lectures for competitiveness. Now Chinese industries are faster, cheaper, more integrated, and more efficient — from EVs to batteries, solar, electronics, ports, logistics, and manufacturing ecosystems. So Europe invents new language: “Diversification.” “De-risking.” “Overdependence.” “Fair competition.” But strip away the diplomatic costume, and it is just protectionism with Brussels paperwork. China did not force Europe to deindustrialize itself. Europe made its choices. It followed Washington. It sanctioned its own energy base. It taxed its own consumers. It slowed its own innovation. It lectured China while China built. And now it wants China to pay for Europe’s failure to compete. No. China-EU trade is not a charity program for declining European industries. If Europe wants competitiveness, it should build it. Not rename protectionism as “diversification” and expect China to applaud.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

47,517 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

PORT TALBOT - Today Britain no longer makes steel….So we can save the planet! 🏭Instead we’re going to import it from countries like Germany and China. 🏭They import vast quantities of coal (so they can also say they are saving the planet) …to make the steel for the Uk 🏭And this is Richard’s Bay in S.A. the queue of diesel trucks is full of coal, on its way to Germany, to make British steel. Ahh … the circular economy of net zero 🤡
0:23

PORT TALBOT - Today Britain no longer makes steel….So we can save the planet! 🏭Instead we’re going to import it from countries like Germany and China. 🏭They import vast quantities of coal (so they can also say they are saving the planet) …to make the steel for the Uk 🏭And this is Richard’s Bay in S.A. the queue of diesel trucks is full of coal, on its way to Germany, to make British steel. Ahh … the circular economy of net zero 🤡

Bernie

867,243 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren