Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Neural networks don't predict the future. Train one on 10,000 dice rolls, it predicts 3.5. A number no die rolls. This is the exact math hedge funds use on markets. Roan just published the framework with full PyTorch code. Bookmark & read tonight, no matter what. Article below.

Phosphen

12,795 subscribers

179,827 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Eğitim Bilim & Teknoloji Finans

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

This 1956 Bell Labs paper is the foundation of every $1B hedge fund. A blackjack player used it to make $800,000,000. Renaissance, Citadel & Jane Street still run on it. 10 pages. The single most useful research paper you can find in open access. Bookmark & read tonight.

This 1956 Bell Labs paper is the foundation of every $1B hedge fund. A blackjack player used it to make $800,000,000. Renaissance, Citadel & Jane Street still run on it. 10 pages. The single most useful research paper you can find in open access. Bookmark & read tonight.

Phosphen

369,852 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

The most boring bot on Polymarket is the most reliable one. It's a sweeper. It doesn't predict anything. But it prints me ~$11k /month PASSSIVELY. My public wallet: < It waits until the outcome is ALREADY decided, then buys a sure thing for less than a dollar. Here's the whole idea: When BTC has clearly closed above the line with seconds left, that share is worth $1. But someone's still selling it at 99c. You buy it. You redeem it at a dollar. The gap is yours. No forecast. No coin flip. Just collecting a cent someone left on the table, hundreds of times a day. That's why it runs on crypto markets, the outcomes resolve fast and clean. Full build + code in the article below. Thank me later.

The most boring bot on Polymarket is the most reliable one. It's a sweeper. It doesn't predict anything. But it prints me ~$11k /month PASSSIVELY. My public wallet: < It waits until the outcome is ALREADY decided, then buys a sure thing for less than a dollar. Here's the whole idea: When BTC has clearly closed above the line with seconds left, that share is worth $1. But someone's still selling it at 99c. You buy it. You redeem it at a dollar. The gap is yours. No forecast. No coin flip. Just collecting a cent someone left on the table, hundreds of times a day. That's why it runs on crypto markets, the outcomes resolve fast and clean. Full build + code in the article below. Thank me later.

Punisher

15,678 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

this is f**king dangerous someone figured out how to make Opus 4.8 run on Fable 5's brain with one prompt access to the best model is never guaranteed. It disappeared once already this year. but you can use it forever. here's how: 1. ask Fable 5: "write the operating manual your replacement will run on" (procedures, failure modes, a 5-question self-test) 2. save the output as one .md file and drop it into a new Claude Project as the project instructions 3. switch to Opus 4.8 and now your everyday model runs off the smart one's method, no top-tier price save and bookmark this no matter what full extraction prompt is in the article below: ↓

this is f**king dangerous someone figured out how to make Opus 4.8 run on Fable 5's brain with one prompt access to the best model is never guaranteed. It disappeared once already this year. but you can use it forever. here's how: 1. ask Fable 5: "write the operating manual your replacement will run on" (procedures, failure modes, a 5-question self-test) 2. save the output as one .md file and drop it into a new Claude Project as the project instructions 3. switch to Opus 4.8 and now your everyday model runs off the smart one's method, no top-tier price save and bookmark this no matter what full extraction prompt is in the article below: ↓

Hamza Khalid

32,300 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

ANTHROPIC ENGINEER JUST SHOWS EXACTLY WHAT GRAPH ENGINEERING LOOKS LIKE WHEN A TASK RUNS THROUGH IT most people arguing about graphs online have never actually watched one execute Task → Researcher → Planner → Writer + Code Agent → Reviewer → Deploy six nodes, one shared state, graph completes itself while you watch loop mode gets disabled the second the task splits into real specialties, one agent stops trying to do everything at once reviewer catches a failure, kicks it straight back to the exact node that broke - not a full restart, no lost context the graph is not a fancier loop - it is the org chart your agents were missing bookmark this and watch it run, then read the article below to see why the timeline just found what production systems already do

ANTHROPIC ENGINEER JUST SHOWS EXACTLY WHAT GRAPH ENGINEERING LOOKS LIKE WHEN A TASK RUNS THROUGH IT most people arguing about graphs online have never actually watched one execute Task → Researcher → Planner → Writer + Code Agent → Reviewer → Deploy six nodes, one shared state, graph completes itself while you watch loop mode gets disabled the second the task splits into real specialties, one agent stops trying to do everything at once reviewer catches a failure, kicks it straight back to the exact node that broke - not a full restart, no lost context the graph is not a fancier loop - it is the org chart your agents were missing bookmark this and watch it run, then read the article below to see why the timeline just found what production systems already do

leopardracer

53,328 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

This trader turned $130 into $33,000 on Polymarket using a simple script it doesn't read news, check polls or predict anything just buys contracts under 1c that everyone thinks are dead wrong 94% of the time -> one hit = 99x, one win covers 98 losses His wins: $1,191 -> $11,990 $11 -> $2,587 $133 -> $1,791 The inefficiency: markets priced at 99c/1c pull back to 50c far more often than the price implies I found 8 wallets doing this -> $550K combined fed 400M trades into Claude, built the bot full code inside copy his trades with ARES: bookmark this before the code gets taken down

This trader turned $130 into $33,000 on Polymarket using a simple script it doesn't read news, check polls or predict anything just buys contracts under 1c that everyone thinks are dead wrong 94% of the time -> one hit = 99x, one win covers 98 losses His wins: $1,191 -> $11,990 $11 -> $2,587 $133 -> $1,791 The inefficiency: markets priced at 99c/1c pull back to 50c far more often than the price implies I found 8 wallets doing this -> $550K combined fed 400M trades into Claude, built the bot full code inside copy his trades with ARES: bookmark this before the code gets taken down

Paone

13,390 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

212,000 people stopped scrolling for a staircase. that's not luck. that's what happens when the visual is right. real estate has always sold on emotion. the problem was getting the visual in front of enough people. AI just solved that part. one scan. one video. organic reach to thousands of buyers. no agency. no crew. no $2,000 shoot. the full breakdown is in the article below.

212,000 people stopped scrolling for a staircase. that's not luck. that's what happens when the visual is right. real estate has always sold on emotion. the problem was getting the visual in front of enough people. AI just solved that part. one scan. one video. organic reach to thousands of buyers. no agency. no crew. no $2,000 shoot. the full breakdown is in the article below.

Dep

16,740 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This trader has won 148 predictions in a row on Polymarket He only bets on No and always win Here's the cold math behind his $275k profit 148 closed positions. Every single one: Won His secret? He doesn't predict the future The math that makes this work: EV = P(No) × Payout − Cost When the market says 95¢, it implies 95% confidence You should try copy-trade him even with $10 using Kreo: He just identifies what the market is overestimating His strategy: • Find extreme price targets the crowd thinks are possible • Buy "No" when the odds reach 88-98¢ • Collect the premium like an insurance company He doesn't care about the asset He cares about the mispricing

This trader has won 148 predictions in a row on Polymarket He only bets on No and always win Here's the cold math behind his $275k profit 148 closed positions. Every single one: Won His secret? He doesn't predict the future The math that makes this work: EV = P(No) × Payout − Cost When the market says 95¢, it implies 95% confidence You should try copy-trade him even with $10 using Kreo: He just identifies what the market is overestimating His strategy: • Find extreme price targets the crowd thinks are possible • Buy "No" when the odds reach 88-98¢ • Collect the premium like an insurance company He doesn't care about the asset He cares about the mispricing

Ricker

198,670 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

"You Dropped a Bomb on Me" (Aug 1982) is synth funk with that falling bomb whistle and timpani rolls. It reached No. 2 R&B and No. 31 Hot 100. Do you remember this group or the song?

"You Dropped a Bomb on Me" (Aug 1982) is synth funk with that falling bomb whistle and timpani rolls. It reached No. 2 R&B and No. 31 Hot 100. Do you remember this group or the song?

🇺🇸Hot Pepper

13,285 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

A wallet called yamal19 - created TODAY - just dropped $1.6M on Spain to win the World Cup. one bet. no hedge. 🇪🇸 Spain to win it all - $1.6M @ 59¢ fresh account. hours old. exactly ONE prediction in its history - 2.7M shares on Spain lifting the trophy tonight. a fan? almost certainly. but you spin up a wallet the day of the final, name it yamal19, and send $1.6M on Spain with zero hedge... the timeline's going to run with that 👀 whoever's behind it isn't here to hedge. they're here to watch Spain win 🇪🇸

A wallet called yamal19 - created TODAY - just dropped $1.6M on Spain to win the World Cup. one bet. no hedge. 🇪🇸 Spain to win it all - $1.6M @ 59¢ fresh account. hours old. exactly ONE prediction in its history - 2.7M shares on Spain lifting the trophy tonight. a fan? almost certainly. but you spin up a wallet the day of the final, name it yamal19, and send $1.6M on Spain with zero hedge... the timeline's going to run with that 👀 whoever's behind it isn't here to hedge. they're here to watch Spain win 🇪🇸

Polykinder

650,668 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce

In 2025, the smartest thing you can do is this: → Pick a painful problem → Train an AI agent to solve it → Charge people for using it Here's what I'd use to start and scale it to $5k/month, with no team, no funding, no code 👇

In 2025, the smartest thing you can do is this: → Pick a painful problem → Train an AI agent to solve it → Charge people for using it Here's what I'd use to start and scale it to $5k/month, with no team, no funding, no code 👇

EyeingAI

51,466 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Is it the game devs that don't know how to use unreal engine 5, or the engine is just unfixable with its temporal smears? this is "epic" preset with ray tracing on and no upscaling.

Is it the game devs that don't know how to use unreal engine 5, or the engine is just unfixable with its temporal smears? this is "epic" preset with ray tracing on and no upscaling.

xPaw

143,281 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

You can make $600K. With a bot that earns $83 every hour, 24/7, no days off, 365 days straight. By buying both sides of the same match on Polymarket and locking profit before the game even starts. > The bot buys YES and NO simultaneously on sports markets. > When combined price is below $1 - profit is locked instantly. > 7,877 trades. > $619K in 12 months. Check the wallet here: I reverse-engineered every trade and rebuilt the full logic in Claude Opus 4.6. The strategy, the math, both arb types, the exact 5-step bot architecture - all in the article. Feed it to your OpenClaw, let it spec the bot for Claude Opus 4.6, and you are set.

You can make $600K. With a bot that earns $83 every hour, 24/7, no days off, 365 days straight. By buying both sides of the same match on Polymarket and locking profit before the game even starts. > The bot buys YES and NO simultaneously on sports markets. > When combined price is below $1 - profit is locked instantly. > 7,877 trades. > $619K in 12 months. Check the wallet here: I reverse-engineered every trade and rebuilt the full logic in Claude Opus 4.6. The strategy, the math, both arb types, the exact 5-step bot architecture - all in the article. Feed it to your OpenClaw, let it spec the bot for Claude Opus 4.6, and you are set.

may.crypto {🦅}

998,611 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

MOST PEOPLE WHO BUILD WEBSITES USE CLAUDE CODE THE WRONG WAY A few people train it properly and get the bottom one. The difference is not the model. It is the skills you feed it. Regular Claude without web-design systems produces clean but average product pages. The same Claude, loaded with the right skills, starts delivering sites that look like they cost $5,000. Those skills are free right now. They live on GitHub. The exact names sit in the article below. One set of prompts. One trained workflow. Suddenly every luxury brand page you build stops looking like a template and starts looking like money.

Romario

218,342 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

They quoted him $6,000 for a website He opened Claude Code instead 4 minutes later it was live The gap between knowing how to use Claude Code and not knowing is worth thousands EngineerKit is what made this possible It's on full guide below

They quoted him $6,000 for a website He opened Claude Code instead 4 minutes later it was live The gap between knowing how to use Claude Code and not knowing is worth thousands EngineerKit is what made this possible It's on full guide below

Madni Aghadi

78,111 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

+$2,912 ON WEATHER MARKETS WITHOUT PREDICTING A SINGLE TEMPERATURE 80.6% win rate. 1,200+ positions. fully automated the pattern is simple and works on any weather market: > every specific temperature range has a low hit probability > market often overprices narrow exact bands at $0.05-$0.10 > the No side sits at $0.90-$1.00 -> almost free money > buy No across 20+ cities simultaneously > 87.7% resolve in your favor by pure base-rate math > run it with a bot 24/7 so you never miss a market you don't need a weather model -> you need to understand that exact values almost never land > full profile: real edge survives stress. this one did

Mr. Buzzoni

57,916 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

I spent 48h to find this ''bot trading wallet'' on Polymarket He made 10,057 trades in one month and earned $87,000 > this wallet is an arbitrage bot > trades only BTC Up or Down (5 min) only > always use the same strategy And here's how it trades: > waits until one of the outcomes (YES/NO) falls below 35¢ > buy more when the average price is low > watch how the opposite outcome moves > makes sure the total average prices are under 99¢ > if he doesn't have a hedge, just closing the position with no losses This is exactly how algo-trading works His profile:

sopersone

36,813 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

BREAKING: Scientists may have just cracked the code on treating leukemia at HOME. A new study published in Lancet Haematology shows AML (blood cancer) can now be treated with a pill — no hospital, no IV drip, no infusion chair. Here's why this is a big deal 🧵👇

BREAKING: Scientists may have just cracked the code on treating leukemia at HOME. A new study published in Lancet Haematology shows AML (blood cancer) can now be treated with a pill — no hospital, no IV drip, no infusion chair. Here's why this is a big deal 🧵👇

Harshi Peiris, Ph.D.

51,028 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

KOREA OWNS MORE $SPCX THAN ALL OF WALL STREET COMBINED Yes, you read that right Yes, the largest holder of $SPCX is not the USA Let me show you the math: - Mirae Asset (South Korean fund): 26,000,000 Shares - Swedbank (Sweden): 3,560,000 Shares - Everyone else: under 1,200,000 Shares One Korean firm holds 7x more than the second largest owner on the planet At $113 per share that's roughly $2,950,000,000 No headlines. No CNBC segment. No viral post about it Just quiet accumulation while everyone was looking elsewhere So why Korea? Here's what I think is happening Mirae Asset manages $600 billion globally. At that scale you don't accidentally build a $3 billion position in one name They're not buying SpaceX. They're buying Starlink - the only communication infrastructure on earth that no government can shut down. And Korea understands better than most what it means to depend on communication infrastructure you don't control This isn't a tech trade. This is a strategic position disguised as a stock pick American funds are still running DCF models on rocket launches Korean money already made the call

KOREA OWNS MORE $SPCX THAN ALL OF WALL STREET COMBINED Yes, you read that right Yes, the largest holder of $SPCX is not the USA Let me show you the math: - Mirae Asset (South Korean fund): 26,000,000 Shares - Swedbank (Sweden): 3,560,000 Shares - Everyone else: under 1,200,000 Shares One Korean firm holds 7x more than the second largest owner on the planet At $113 per share that's roughly $2,950,000,000 No headlines. No CNBC segment. No viral post about it Just quiet accumulation while everyone was looking elsewhere So why Korea? Here's what I think is happening Mirae Asset manages $600 billion globally. At that scale you don't accidentally build a $3 billion position in one name They're not buying SpaceX. They're buying Starlink - the only communication infrastructure on earth that no government can shut down. And Korea understands better than most what it means to depend on communication infrastructure you don't control This isn't a tech trade. This is a strategic position disguised as a stock pick American funds are still running DCF models on rocket launches Korean money already made the call

bee🐝

233,653 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce

I STOPPED REVIEWING MY OWN AGENT, SOMETHING ELSE DOES IT NOW I used to read every diff it produced and approve most of them, because an agent grading itself always says the work is good. -> Now a second model with different instructions tries to break the work first, and I only read what survived. Here is what is actually in the folder that took over the night shift: • the brief > CONTRACT.md -- what it may touch, and what it may never touch. > VISION.md -- the destination, so turn 47 still knows why it started. • the gate > judge/ -- a different model, never the one that wrote the code. > break-it.md -- it opens the page, clicks, screenshots, reports back. > -- no opinion, just zero or non-zero. > shift.yml -- 03:30 every night, laptop closed. • the memory > receipts/ -- one folder per night, dated and graded. > STATE.md -- where it stopped and what it escalated. > lessons.log -- the flaky test, written down once instead of rediscovered weekly. • the brakes > caps.json -- turn limit, retry limit, spend limit. > -- written on day one, used never. The generator decides what your loop can produce -> The judge decides what it refuses to produce. One of those is the part everyone builds -> The other is why most loops quietly fail. Bookmark it & Read Full breakdown below ↓

I STOPPED REVIEWING MY OWN AGENT, SOMETHING ELSE DOES IT NOW I used to read every diff it produced and approve most of them, because an agent grading itself always says the work is good. -> Now a second model with different instructions tries to break the work first, and I only read what survived. Here is what is actually in the folder that took over the night shift: • the brief > CONTRACT.md -- what it may touch, and what it may never touch. > VISION.md -- the destination, so turn 47 still knows why it started. • the gate > judge/ -- a different model, never the one that wrote the code. > break-it.md -- it opens the page, clicks, screenshots, reports back. > -- no opinion, just zero or non-zero. > shift.yml -- 03:30 every night, laptop closed. • the memory > receipts/ -- one folder per night, dated and graded. > STATE.md -- where it stopped and what it escalated. > lessons.log -- the flaky test, written down once instead of rediscovered weekly. • the brakes > caps.json -- turn limit, retry limit, spend limit. > -- written on day one, used never. The generator decides what your loop can produce -> The judge decides what it refuses to produce. One of those is the part everyone builds -> The other is why most loops quietly fail. Bookmark it & Read Full breakdown below ↓

slash1s

37,405 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

Claude "Puzzling" while GPT 5.6 on GOD-MODE just bade a banger that's mindblowing. Here's the exact way to get a site like this, step by step: > open the desktop app, pick Sol, reasoning on High. taste work never goes to small models > drop it 3 sites with motion you love and one line: "reverse-engineer the art direction: mood, typography, pacing, and WHY each animation exists. save it as a style bible" > brief in one paragraph, goal not steps: "[your niche] site, cinematic scroll, every animation has a job. follow the bible" > house rules on top: no template hero, no stock gradients, nothing on the page moves without a reason > now the bar: "a motion designer can't tell this from an agency build." spin up a SECOND 5.6 with fresh context whose only job is to FAIL the build against that bar > /loop overnight: build, grade, close the biggest gap, again. you're asleep for all of it > when the verifier runs out of complaints: tag Sites. live URL, one click, zero hosting The deeper version of every step (the full contract, the house rules, the verifier trick, when Ultra is worth the bill) is in the article below. P.S. send the article to your GPT and tell it "we're doing this tonight".

Claude "Puzzling" while GPT 5.6 on GOD-MODE just bade a banger that's mindblowing. Here's the exact way to get a site like this, step by step: > open the desktop app, pick Sol, reasoning on High. taste work never goes to small models > drop it 3 sites with motion you love and one line: "reverse-engineer the art direction: mood, typography, pacing, and WHY each animation exists. save it as a style bible" > brief in one paragraph, goal not steps: "[your niche] site, cinematic scroll, every animation has a job. follow the bible" > house rules on top: no template hero, no stock gradients, nothing on the page moves without a reason > now the bar: "a motion designer can't tell this from an agency build." spin up a SECOND 5.6 with fresh context whose only job is to FAIL the build against that bar > /loop overnight: build, grade, close the biggest gap, again. you're asleep for all of it > when the verifier runs out of complaints: tag Sites. live URL, one click, zero hosting The deeper version of every step (the full contract, the house rules, the verifier trick, when Ultra is worth the bill) is in the article below. P.S. send the article to your GPT and tell it "we're doing this tonight".

Miraqle

206,109 görüntüleme • 29 gün önce