正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
NEVER SEEN BEFORE: Retired Army Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer Shares Notes From His Post-9/11 Briefing With 9/11 Commission Executive Director Philip Zelikow About Classified Program ABLE DANGER “So the cells, we found the cells in the initial run of data. And I told him specifically, we found two of... show more
0 条评论
暂无评论
原始帖子的评论将显示在这里
![Tenured Professor at Michigan State University Mark Skidmore on the $21 TRILLION missing from the DOD's balance sheet: "in a single year, the Army had acknowledged... it could not account for $6.2 trillion in transactions" "we found, from official government sources, $21 trillion in transactions for which there was no clear explanation" "[This] happened... back in 2016, '17, '18, [when] the total debt was about $21 trillion" "[the federal government] said they were going to address the challenge, and they said, We're going to conduct our first official external audit of the DOD ever" "[But] after it completed [the audit], [DOD] did not pass the audit and has not since. So it's been about eight years" This clip of Skidmore, a tenured Professor and Morris Chair in State and Local Government Finance and Policy, who also serves as a resident fellow with the MSU Extension Center for Local Government Finance and Policy, is taken from a discussion with Alexander Sachon (Alexander Sachon) posted to YouTube on January 10, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "That's when I ran into some of Catherine Austin Fitts' work. And I was just listening to an interview and she, she made a statement that in fiscal year 2015, the report came out in 2016, for the DOD, specifically the Army, in which, in a single year, the Army had acknowledged, through an OIG report, the Office of Inspector General, that it could not account for $6.2 trillion in transactions. "So having some background in looking at local government and finances and state level, it's like there's no way that these accounting discrepancies should be multiples of the entire budget. "If you had say a 500 billion dollar budget from the Army or a 200 billion dollar budget, it'd only be a small fraction. How could it be multiples? So I just, I, at first I thought she had made a mistake. It couldn't be, you know, $6.2 trillion, maybe $6.2 billion. And even then that would be a huge sum to lose track of. "And so I found the report myself and I just started looking at it. Just all kinds of strange examples of transactions that couldn't be accounted for. And so I just started asking questions, and then Catherine and I were in touch with one another and we said, let's try to systematically look over the years for all of these reports that exist and just sum them up and tally them and see what we can learn. "And you know, so they don't, they typically don't produce a report like this every year for the Army or every year for the Navy, etc. They only do them every once in a while. So we tallied them all up for the DOD as well as Housing and Urban Development. And we found, from official government sources, $21 trillion in transactions for which there were no clear explanation. "And so we just asked the question and it, it happened at that time, back in 2016, '17, '18, it, it, the, the total debt was about $21 trillion. So it just got a lot of exposure in the media, like, wow. "So in that sense I think people started to ask questions and it got a little bit of attention, which I think is good. But the challenge was is that the federal government, rather than addressing it, on the one side they said they were going to address the challenge and they said, we're going to conduct our first official external audit of the DOD ever. And after it completed that, it did not pass the audit and has not since. So it's been about eight years."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2064860605958455457/amplify_video_thumb/2064857193363783680/img/cl2wERBOP69gfNa_.jpg)
!["The [COVID] shots were coming from the DOD...They have a separate office [inside Moderna]. Only people with security clearance can go in that office. And [they] receive [the] active ingredients in bags. [Moderna doesn't] know what it is, [they] just mix it...and ship it out." Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") describes for Neil Oliver (Neil Oliver) how the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) is ultimately responsible for much of the design and production of the COVID injections. Latypova says in this clip that the Pentagon put on several press conferences "where [they discussed] that they have their own mRNA products" and notes that the department even has its own separate office inside of Moderna, which is only accessible to those with the right security clearance. Incredibly, Latypova notes that the DOD provides the active ingredients for the injections to Moderna "in bags," which are then mixed in with lipid nanoparticles and shipped out. Those who do the mixing at Moderna have no idea what's inside of the bags. "Clearly, this is a government vaccine," Latypova says. ---------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "So yes, so the way this was done, ostensibly, they're saying HHS partnered with DOD, although, actually, they've been learning and figured out how why they partnered together. They partnered together to overcome their own respective limitations which was Legal limitations. Legal limitations established by Congress of what they can and cannot do. So to overcome those limitations, they combined their forces, HHS and DOD, to order mass order medical products and vaccines that were going to be distributed to the civilian population and would not be they would be under these EUA countermeasure frameworks, which absolves them of all regulatory requirements. And so separately, they couldn't do that. "So DoD could do it for themselves, but not for civilian population, not in mass. And for HHS to do that, it needed to go through regulatory approval, which this didn't. So they combined their forces. And then the Department of Defense gave this consortium, this public private consortium, dollars 50 billion dollars, just the first goal, to produce these shots. But the shots were coming from the DoD. So the DoD actually there are several Pentagon press releases or press conferences rather where they're discussing that they have their own product, their own mRNA product. "And so, and I'm also in touch with other, people who worked and currently work for Moderna. And they were saying, yeah, we have a separate office inside Moderna. This is in outside of Boston. They have a separate office, which is DOD only. Only people with security clearance can go in that office. And we receive active ingredient in bags. We don't know what it is, and we just mix it in with LNPs and ship it out. "DARPA and also NIH participated in this. So, specifically, NIH developed several vaccine candidates, transferred them to Moderna, the new product candidates, transferred them to Moderna right before 2020. There are documents for that too. And then as part of the R and D I also discussed this with RFK Jr. As part of the R and D program, which was very poorly done, but still there were some studies being done, NIH ran several studies several critical studies for Moderna. "So NIH themselves in their Vaccine Research Center ran those studies, gave reports to Moderna. And these reports have we still have very hard time to FOIA them. And it's in process. We're trying to FOIA them. But so and NIH also co owns investigational so there's an investigational number assigned to every new product in pharmaceutical R and D and FDA approval program. So NIH owns separate number for Moderna product in addition to Moderna owning another number. So there are two numbers for one product. One is owned by NIH. One is owned by Moderna. So clearly, this is a government vaccine."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1887939227918409838/ext_tw_video_thumb/1887935782893023232/pu/img/J6LBotoJB9R13SVR.jpg)
![Scott Jennings: “Today, [Zohran Mamdani] had this press conference—I watched a chunk of it. I didn't hear any words for the victims of 9/11 but he found the real victim, his aunt. The victims of 9/11 were in the Twin Towers. This were the victims.” Abby Phillip: “Is the implication here that he has to answer for the terrorist who attacked 9/11?” Scott Jennings: “No, I think if you’re going to run for Mayor of New York City… and you’re going to talk about 9/11 or invoke 9/11. You darn sure better start with the people that died in the Twin Towers… and he didn’t do that. He made it about his experience and his aunt.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1982079280587608206/amplify_video_thumb/1982079021723668480/img/1HiRXc8MSuJ3t5eM.jpg)
!["Two days after the election in 2016, I was called up on the NSA phone. The person said I had to be on the intelligence community assessment that was assembling to finalize the Russia narrative. because we were going to prove that Trump was a Russian asset, and we were going to delay or block the inauguration of Donald J. Trump for the first term. I just couldn't believe it. This is what I was told on the phone. So, this was a deep state coup from the beginning that actually started in early 2016. We went through the process in November, December. The final product came out in the first few days of January, 2017. But bottom line - [in] the supposed Top Secret Review, there was nothing there to show that Russia was trying to manipulate the campaign or the outcome of the election in the favor of Donald J Trump, that the Trump campaign was somehow colluding with Russia. There was no evidence of anything," says Col. (Ret.) John Mills. He served as the Director for Cybersecurity Policy, Strategy, and International Affairs in the Office of the Secretary of Defense.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1950546170855440761/amplify_video_thumb/1950544962694656000/img/bjM_j2RP2vZPuDyt.jpg)
![How Health New Zealand (Te Whatu Ora) Buried Whistleblower Barry Young's Protected Disclosure. Barry Young details how he made a protected disclosure to Health New Zealand’s executive leadership team with statistical evidence suggesting serious vaccine safety issues. After extensive review with epidemiologists, doctors, and statisticians, he calculated odds of 100 billion to one against the vaccine not causing the observed signals. The handling of his Protected Disclosure reveals suppression of evidence, which would be potentially serious illegality, at the highest levels of the Ministry of Health. Barry had to raise several OIA (Official Information Act) requests to obtain the evidence that Health New Zealand had indeed received his original Protected Disclosure email, despite the evidence being "buried away in an Accenture Report, which was a Forensics Report." This is essential viewing for anyone who has concerns about government transparency, public health accountability, and Whistleblower Protections in New Zealand and beyond. Transcript: "I gave it to Health New Zealand, that was my protected disclosure... And only after doing a lot of due diligence with a lot of experts and statisticians and doctors who looked at it and I found out in hindsight I'm perfectly allowed to do that under the act to see how and whether that's important, whether to make a protected disclosure. It was all... red flag, red flag, red flag. So yes, I did put all that together, I did some crude analysis back then, getting a lot better at it now. And I just came up with some numbers that was 100 billion to one against the vaccine not causing this. I can't say for sure, I can never say that. And I sent that in an email to the executive leadership team at Health New Zealand. So of course, yeah, yeah, to make them aware of what I was saying and that formed the protected disclosure which was the whole purpose of the act, which is why we're here. Of course, they just ignored that and retaliated. In the police disclosures, I didn't even see a sign of that original email that I sent, they tried to bury it, they tried to withhold it from evidence because it was a protected disclosure. The original ELT email, the only one they did provide as evidence was the email I sent to the MPs, not knowing that that wasn't a protected disclosure. I didn't know the act at the time, but they withheld the one I sent to the executive leadership team. And the only reason that I can think of they did that was to try and avoid saying that it was a protected disclosure. They tried to bury it. I... emailed them, the Crown, the police, where's the email that I sent to the executive team? Oh no, we've sent you everything that we have. So I thought, that's a bit strange. I did send an email. ... I had to resort to writing OIA's to Health New Zealand, which they denied. They said, oh no, we didn't, there's no email sent from you at that time to these people. Your request is denied because it doesn't exist. And I wrote back to them. I said, check again, please. These are the times. These are the dates. And they said, we've gone back and we've done a thorough check and we stand by original decision. The email doesn't exist. So Health New Zealand said twice that email doesn't exist. I found it. The evidence buried away in an Accenture report, which was a forensics report. I said, hang on a minute. There's the email there in that report. Only after that did the police and the Crown reply to me. And lo and behold, there it was. The protected disclosure email... produced nearly a year after I was charged. It should have been the very first thing that they sent and [that] they dealt with. ...Looking at a protected disclosure, the way it's meant to be, they're meant to receive it and acknowledge it and reply to it. They tried to bury it."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2079740952785424403/amplify_video_thumb/2079731110884646912/img/RJZ1Eky984U5NigT.jpg)