Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

BREAKING: Declassifying Pre-9/11 Operation Able Danger Records Would Show The Defense Department Was “Farther Ahead” Understanding the Global Al-Qaeda Network Than Previously Reported Says Retired Lt. Col Tony Shaffer “I do believe that had we been given the green light to conduct some of the operations that were proposed,...

65,603 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

EXCLUSIVE: New Bi-Partisan Push to Declassify FBI Records Mapping 9/11 Hijackers US Support Network and Alleged Saudi Financing "Substantial Highly Relevant Evidence Has Still Not Been Produced In Court And/Or Released Publicly" The three page letter from Rep. Nadler, Rep. Dan Goldman, Nicole Malliotakis to the Archives confirms the FBI records are being sought through the Public Interest Declassification Board Public Interest Declassification Board With the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 Al Qaeda terrorist attacks that killed nearly three thousand Americans approaching, I sat down with retired Lieutenant Colonel Tony Shaffer who was part of a controversial and classified program called ABLE DANGER. Prior to 9/11, ABLE DANGER datamined phone, travel and financial records to identify al Qaeda members. Shaffer produced new evidence to back up claims that the team identified al Qaeda cells before the attack as well as lead hijacker Mohammed Atta. In 2006, a Senate Report and the DoD internal watchdog (DoD Inspector General) concluded there was no evidence to support the ABLE DANGER claims. But in a 2017 sworn affidavit and “Disclosure of Urgent Concern” to the Intelligence Community Internal Watchdog, a DoD IG Senior Executive said the Senate Report was “informed by the flawed and incorrect premises” of the DoD IG report that was part of a "continued pattern of misconduct." This wide-ranging interview examines suppressed pre-9/11 intelligence, the present day push for declassification of FBI records on Saudi ties, and accountability 25 years later. We reached out to the Saudi Embassy in Washington DC. A spokesperson confirmed receipt of our questions. We will update if a response becomes available. We reached out to the Intelligence Community Inspector General about the status of the ABLE Danger disclosure. The Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission Philip Zelikow said “The Commission staff did follow up and look into what he (Shaffer) had to say…there was no evidence that Atta had ever been in the USA before June 2000 and the exhaustive investigation of his whereabouts and contacts by both the FBI and German intelligence turned up no evidence that would corroborate the earlier hypothesis of his links to a Brooklyn-based cell. This then turned into the issue of how to explain the confusion.” “I remain attentive to the New York litigation. My longstanding hope was that a criminal trial of the people in our custody would bring out some added details but, again, those would probably affect some particulars rather than overall judgments.” LA Times Media Group LA Times Studios 00:39 Government Weaponization Against ABLE DANGER Whistleblowers 01:36 How ABLE DANGER Datamining Worked 02:28 ABLE DANGER Techniques Still Used Today 03:06 Declassified ABLE DANGER Records Would Show Pre-9/11 Defense Department Was “Farther Ahead” On Al-Qaeda 04:10 NEW: Bi-Partisan Push to Declassify FBI Records About Hijackers U.S Support Network + Funding 05:10 First Time Sharing Notes From Meeting With Executive Director 9/11 Commission 06:03 Photo 9/11 Lead Hijacker Mohammed Atta 06:42 Follow up 9/11 Comission: “I called that number…never mind we don’t need to talk to you” 07:42 9/11 Commission Silent on ABLE DANGER 08:45 House Report Confirms Retaliation, Security Clearance Pulled Over $67.00 Cellphone Bill 10:12 Multiple Reports, Senate and DoD Inspector General Concluded ABLE DANGER Did Not Identify Lead Hijacker 11:07 ABLE DANGER chart 12:25 Options To Stop Al-Qaeda Go Back To Clinton and Bush 43 13:15 Senior Executive DoD Internal Watchdog Files Allegation of Misconduct, Calls DoD IG ABLE DANGER Report “Unsupportable” 13:55 New Information About 9/11 Including Epstein Files 15:49 Cover-Up? 16:44 Shaffer: “If anyone is going to actually have the courage to do something about this it’s Donald J. Trump”

Catherine Herridge

1,021,800 views • 5 days ago

The attached video is an interesting clip from a news article just before the referendum vote. Make no mistake, the black population was ready for a fight and if the vote was NO, that we would have had a full on civil war on our hands. The question that I have to ask myself, after seeing with my own eyes many, many times how the mobs scatter after the first bullet flies, is how they would have stood up to the Armed Forces of the Republic. Should it have resulted in an outright war and the gloves were completely off, my personal feelings are that the numerical advantages of the enemy would have been neutralised by artillery and airstrikes into the townships. Not that I would have ever hoped for this, but this is the reality of war. With water, power and supplies cut off and disease spreading, I do not think that the 'majority' could have held out forever. Wouter Basson could have been properly unleashed and entire townships wiped out with poisoned water supplies and other nefarious means. Let's not even talk about our nuclear weapons, which would have most certainly drawn other nuclear powers into the war, some with us and some against us. Nukes aside, we would have had our work cut out for us with communist reinforcements arriving from neighbouring countries. SWAPO were formidable opponents and with them now well equipped, we could have faced some indiscriminate artillery shelling of our own cities and population areas. The Mozambicans were battle hardened by that stage and also a formidable enemy. As always, we would have had to deal with traitors and sympathisers from our own people. As an officer, I would have been responsible for executing traitors and deserters which would not have been nice, or that nice depending on how one looks at it. The whole country would have definitely come to a standstill, possibly for decades, the losses would have been devastating on both sides, and we would not have gotten to enjoy the 1995 World Cup victory, the wonderful 1990's or any day as we know it since then. Every single day from then until now would have been different. Some of my children would not have been born and I would have most certainly lost many loved family members, friends and brother comrades-in-arms, if not my own life. My best friend through my service lives down the road from me and I see him at least a couple of times a week. For that I am blessed. I am not saying that we could not have won, I am just asking if it would have been worth it. Come to think about it. I am glad that peace prevailed, in whatever iteration of peace that we call this. It hurts real bad to think that we laid down our arms and handed over governance of our beloved South Africa to an organised crime syndicate masquerading as a political party. Ultimately true intentions are judged by results and there is nobody alive that can not see plain as day, that the intention of the ANC all along was just to loot the country for themselves without a care in the world for anybody else. They took it all and threw everybody else the scraps. A tear runs down my face when I think of what we could have become and how those wonderful late 90's could have gone on forever. How do we fix this?

Pookie's Polls & Opinions

13,374 views • 4 months ago