正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

New California Law is about to take effect that will require data brokers to delete all data they have on all residents California’s DELETE Act was passed awhile back, but in a few weeks companies must start deleting all data they collected in residents “The Electronic Frontier Foundation has...

84,489 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

35 条评论

Truth Shero 的头像
Truth Shero2 个月前

Is this to hide illegal aliens? I don't trust California's intention on anything.

Heartland Grump - The Rightest Voice on the Right 的头像
Heartland Grump - The Rightest Voice on the Right2 个月前

I wonder if @CAgovernor will also require the Communist Chinese Party to delete the voter registration files of California voters...

HVYMTL 的头像
HVYMTL2 个月前

CA never does anything just to benefit citizens. So what’s the real reason CA passed this?

DW45_1911 的头像
DW45_19112 个月前

Pfft! Yeah right...they're going to make them delete data. We have a Federal Do Not Call Registry for many years that they ignore too.

Richard Seymore 的头像
Richard Seymore2 个月前

Yeah those companies aren't going to delete the data. It will be stored in the cloud somewhere as they show they've removed the data from local servers.

ringingbells 的头像
ringingbells2 个月前

Flock Cameras. Will this apply to Flock Cameras everywhere in California.

Thomas_Paine_6771 的头像
Thomas_Paine_67712 个月前

In order to check that data has been deleted, the government will have to be allowed access to the data. The delete act is just a ruse to give the government access to your data.

Amy Alkon 的头像
Amy Alkon2 个月前

Government is always broken. I go through whole process and put in my SS# and CA driver's license and the correct changed address (my mailbox place closed) and they "cannot verify" that I'm a CA resident. SINCE THE 1990s! And you can't click through on the supposedly clickable link.

skizznit 的头像
skizznit2 个月前

I’m skeptical, feel like this is going to help lawmakers erase their trail in fraud

H8asen9* 🇺🇸#SaveAmerica #FreeSpeech 的头像
H8asen9* 🇺🇸#SaveAmerica #FreeSpeech2 个月前

ALL the PEOPLE of the US have the right to privacy.

Thomas Stricklin 的头像
Thomas Stricklin2 个月前

One of the few laws I don’t have a problem with them passing lately but yea it bears watching to see just why it was done these guys are something else here.

Liam 的头像
Liam2 个月前

California’s DELETE Act just got real. Data brokers must delete resident info — and keep deleting new data every 45 days. $200 per person per day fines? That’ll hurt. Finally some pushback on Big Tech surveillance. Privacy win? 🇺🇸 What do you think — will they actually enforce it?

Lisa Rosestars 的头像
Lisa Rosestars2 个月前

How will they enforce this law?

Happiness 的头像
Happiness2 个月前

It will require these brokers to delete the data. Do you really think they are going to do it. No, they will just put it on a secret server.

PullOut 的头像
PullOut2 个月前

California’s DELETE Act is the revenge that everybody has been waiting for. 👀

Canderson 的头像
Canderson2 个月前

This is more than what meets the eye It’s about the illegal and sanctuary city. They don’t want companies to start working with the government has a lot to do with voting also. Reading between the lines

I could be wrong... but I doubt it. 的头像
I could be wrong... but I doubt it.2 个月前

Was this law actually passed to bury/hide much of the illegal alien crime created by @GavinNewsom? He knows the dogs are sniffing him out... @DHSgov @realDonaldTrump @dojphofficial

Aeltri 的头像
Aeltri2 个月前

California thinks it has privacy? That's cute. The #DeleteAct requires data brokers to delete personal info—but it has zero jurisdiction over backups stored outside the state, or data already transferred to federal agencies. Meanwhile, the @FBI, @DHSgov, and @ICEgov can subpoena that data anyway, and the Supremacy Clause ensures federal law trumps state law. California is locking the front door while the federal government has the keys to every gate—and they're not asking permission. Enjoy the illusion of privacy while it lasts. The surveillance state doesn't care about state-level legislation.

Tard Cuckerberg 的头像
Tard Cuckerberg2 个月前

What it's really designed to protect is the data of the rich and powerful. It's just another avenue to destroy evidence of their wrongdoing and corruption.

TC 的头像
TC2 个月前

All these companies make money from my information but If I use the companies info in the same manner I could be arrested or sued

Russ 🇺🇸 🦅 的头像
Russ 🇺🇸 🦅2 个月前

I just started emailing every company where I have been forced to create an account on to do business with them. Nearly all seem to be complying by asking for my Phone number and confirmation of the state I reside in. Some company is selling my data; 30-days of VM.

@wutitis101 的头像
@wutitis1012 个月前

Lemme guess the State Exempted itself from deletions???!!!

Tres Leches 的头像
Tres Leches2 个月前

Once again showing the D's are better at going after rotten corporations than the R's. But the D's in California and elsewhere strip all parental rights and other kinds of rights in favor of government. Death by far left culture and gov vs death by corporate looting, poisoning and control

Aga 的头像
Aga2 个月前

It's nice to see democrats do something right for a change @RonDeSantis @GovRonDeSantis Florida should enact something like this too

Mickey O’Neil 的头像
Mickey O’Neil2 个月前

Rare California win

🇺🇸 Just Some Fudd 🇺🇸 的头像
🇺🇸 Just Some Fudd 🇺🇸2 个月前

If people had any idea of how much information about them is being bought and sold, there would be riots!

Dave 的头像
Dave2 个月前

Where does the money collected via these fines go ? How much is for the individuals whose data is the subject ?

Mike 的头像
Mike2 个月前

If it was about our privacy we'd get the money for the violation not the government

Nigel Gardener 的头像
Nigel Gardener2 个月前

But, it's still ok for the state to keep all your voting data when you've been dead for 10 years.

Calling Occupants of Interplanetary Craft 的头像
Calling Occupants of Interplanetary Craft2 个月前

Deletion request?

Roger Spry 的头像
Roger Spry2 个月前

So the government can collect all your data but a parent can't get the medical records of a 13 year old without consent from the 13 year old

JimZ 的头像
JimZ2 个月前

So they copy the data to a data-farm outside of CA and then wipe everything in CA. Done, complied with CA law but they still have everything on everyone.

Traceyvlewis 的头像
Traceyvlewis2 个月前

Don't trust California. When you log on they ask for MORE personal information, which tells me they're gonna sell it 🤣😂🤣😂

BoilingCrude 的头像
BoilingCrude2 个月前

Will they do that with FLOCK cameras?

Rosalia 的头像
Rosalia2 个月前

Wow California got one right. Happens once in a blue n moon. Imagine how many data buildings are going up and some space just got cleared.

相关视频

🚨 THEY FOUND A LEGAL WAY TO SPY ON EVERY AMERICAN — AND THE 4TH AMENDMENT CAN'T STOP IT Most Americans believe the government needs a warrant to monitor them, track them, or collect detailed information about their private lives. But unfortunately, they found a loophole. The government may not be allowed to directly collect certain information on Americans, but private companies collect enormous amounts of it every single day through smartphones, apps, websites, search engines, location services, online purchases, and countless other digital tools most people use without a second thought. That means your location history, browsing habits, purchases, interests, movements, and daily routines are already being recorded, stored, and traded by an entire industry that most Americans have never even heard of. The loophole is that while the government may not be allowed to collect certain information directly without a warrant, it can reportedly purchase data that private companies have already collected. The information may be gathered by private companies. The data may be sold by data brokers. And the government may still end up with access to it. For years, there was one major limitation. There was simply too much data. Even if someone wanted to analyze billions of data points across millions of people, it would have required an impossible number of human analysts. Then AI arrived. Suddenly, information that would have taken years to organize can be processed, searched, categorized, connected, and analyzed in a fraction of the time. People are warning that the combination of artificial intelligence and the data broker loophole could fundamentally change what surveillance looks like in America. For the first time in history, technology may finally exist that can sift through enormous amounts of personal information at a scale that was previously impossible. The question isn't whether the data exists. The question is who has access to it. Because once your location, habits, purchases, interests, relationships, and daily routines can all be analyzed by machines, the line between convenience and surveillance starts getting harder to see. The most alarming part? Most Americans have no idea this conversation is even happening. Do you trust the government with more information about your life than your own family knows?

HustleBitch

23,930 次观看 • 3 个月前

🔥🔥🔥REP FRENCH HILL bringin' the heat to the HOUSE FINANCIAL SERVICES CMTE hearing... “SEC has lost in the court of public opinion…but the agency is now getting trampled by the federal courts as well…’ARBITRARY and CAPRICIOUS’…’BAD FAITH CONDUCT’…’GROSS ABUSE OF POWER’…it’s clear the SEC blatantly and repeatedly OVERSTEPS STATUTORY AUTHORITY.” 💥LOOK NO FURTHER THAN THE #MMTLPFiasco!!! “SEC is proposing to collect every American's brokerage account statement…EVERYDAY, EVERY TRADE… in their CAT system.” French Hill: How can the SEC still do its job effectively without collecting this personally identifiable information??? " MS. Jennifer Schulp, Former Enforcement Attorney at FINRA: “The SEC has been able to do it for years and has continued to be able to do so with transaction data without the personally identifiable information that has already been collected in the CAT. The way it previously worked, upon the SEC noticing some sort of pattern or suspicious activity would create a request for the investors’ information to the brokerage firms.” 💥WAIT💥WAIT💥WAIT A MINUTE!!!💥 You mean they already has data from the brokers regarding suspicious trading activity??? Like hundreds of millions of #CounterfeitShares, complaints from issuers & whistleblowers?? Who gets them that data??? Brokers at the request of #FINRA.... 💥So, let me get this straight, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigates suspicious trading activity by requesting FINRA to acquire the trading data from the brokers, but both regulators refuse a #WhatIsTheShareCount for $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH, because THEY DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THAT KIND OF DATA??? 💥LIAR, LIAR #PantsOnFire!!! 💥WHO OREDERED THE U3 HALT??? 💥TIME FOR SUBPOENAS & HEARINGS!!! Senate Banking and Housing Democrats U.S. Senate Banking Committee GOP Sherrod Brown Oversight Committee Rep. James Comer Financial Services GOP Rep. Ralph Norman Pete Sessions Patrick McHenry

JunkSavvy

29,992 次观看 • 2 年前