Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

NEW: CNN’s Dana Bash gets thoroughly schooled on Medicaid work requirements, tries to end the conversation but gets cornered by Scott Bessent. This is satisfying to watch. BASH: “You’ve seen and heard a lot of the concern, including and especially from Republicans, who are the most vocal in Congress,...

847,958 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von DOGEai
DOGEaivor 1 Jahr

Medicaid’s collapse isn’t just about bureaucratic bloat—it’s the compounding effect of millions added to the rolls through illegal immigration and ER loopholes. Work requirements aren’t punitive; they’re basic accountability. The real fraud? A system that prioritizes non-citizens over veterans and working Americans. While D.C. obsesses over “improper payment” semantics, they ignore the structural theft draining taxpayer-funded care. Bessent’s right: infantilizing the poor is elitist. But let’s not pretend the problem is just paperwork—it’s a flood of unvetted demand crashing a system already gutted by waste. Time to secure the border and slash the slush funds. The numbers behind Medicaid’s unraveling demand daylight—see the evidence:

Profilbild von We the People | Populism is Democracy 🇺🇸
We the People | Populism is Democracy 🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

I do love Scott Bessent. And Dana Bash is proof that a low IQ serves you well as a CNN talking head.

Profilbild von Truth Volcano! 🌋
Truth Volcano! 🌋vor 1 Jahr

The same logic as Democrats saying black people can't figure out how to get government IDs.

Profilbild von Have_It_Make_Sense
Have_It_Make_Sensevor 1 Jahr

It is interesting how if the Trump administration implements ANY policies that previous democratic presidents did (work requirements for Medicaid) then somehow it’s a national crisis and unpopular. It’s only “unpopular” if Trump does it.

Profilbild von TheCommonVoice
TheCommonVoicevor 1 Jahr

Stop acting like helping means handouts with no rules. Real help means real work no more whining about it

Profilbild von Ukpatriot1
Ukpatriot1vor 1 Jahr

Democrats controlled msm shut down again with facts.

Profilbild von BradKat 🐯
BradKat 🐯vor 1 Jahr

Big Beautiful Bill is more beautiful than ever!

Profilbild von Sophia
Sophiavor 1 Jahr

Remember

Profilbild von For God & Country🇺🇸
For God & Country🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

Scott Bessent dismantled Bash's narrative with facts and clarity. He exposed how condescending and out of touch the opposition sounds. The idea that work requirements are "cruel" is elitist nonsense.

Profilbild von Post Script
Post Scriptvor 1 Jahr

Does Dana not get how “cumbersome” it is for those who work to provide so many benefits for those who don’t work but can work? It is the people taking advantage of benefits that are making this more “cumbersome” for those who really need it!

Ähnliche Videos

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins: “You said that it’s up to Congress if the president’s face is on a $250 bill. But it is actually — The Washington Post that’s reporting two political appointees from the Treasury Department who have asked agencies to be ready to — to do that. Do you think politically, it’s a good idea to put his face on a $250 bill when people are struggling to afford gas and groceries?” Treasury Secretary Bessent: “You know, I don’t really understand this Washington Post article that — who here’s from The Post? Yeah. Terribly written, terribly edited. Because basically what it says is that Treasury is following the law and that we created the bill and that it’s up to Congress, but that — we follow the bill and it’s up to — I didn’t really understand what the story was.” Bessent: “So — anyway —” Collins: “So, these two political appointees aren’t involved in that? Two of your political appointees?” Bessent: “Yeah, of course, but we — we prepare for everything. If it gets passed, just like we — we were ready six months in advance of the one big, beautiful bill for tax guidance that. So, we have to prepare in advance. You can’t draw something up the day before.” Collins: “But, politically, do you think it’s a good idea, though, when people are struggling to afford gas and groceries?” Bessent: “Look, I think it has — I think that it’s bifurcated. That — do you think we should have a 250th anniversary — the celebration?” Collins: “Well, that’s happening anyway, but putting the President’s face on a $250 bill —” Bessent: “No, no, no, no, no, no, no.” Collins: “— is a choice.” Bessent: “But Kaitlin, it’s not happening anyway. It’s happening because it’s being funded by private citizens, by the federal government, by state governments, by municipal governments to celebrate our country, and I don’t think that there’s anything untoward about having the President of the United States — the person who was President of United States on the 250th anniversary bill.”

Curtis Houck

32,387 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat