正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
🔴NEW from BBC 5 Live Breakfast | Interview with Shoo Lee & Judith Moritz on the Lucy Letby case. Lee: "If the medical evidence does not support malfeasance, is the rest of the circumstantial evidence enough to support the conviction? Moritz: ... "[Dr Lee] can't get into discussion about... show more
11 条评论

@LeeShoo @JudithMoritz If Shoo Lee is right about the medical evidence, THEN THERE WERE NO MURDERS He doesn’t need to comment on pyjamas, handover notes or Facebook searches because they are IRRELEVANT Moritz thinking it is significant he hasn’t commented on these things is completely illogical

@LeeShoo @JudithMoritz They make a big deal out of one of the families complaining about Dr Shoo Lee (ignoring Lucy Letby's parents). They then also ignore one of the families complaining about Judith Moritz.

I don't think it was appropriate for the presenter to say "the families of the babies who died and those who were harmed are very upset about the presentation of this new interpretation", when towards the end of the interview they mention that the solicitors representing the families refused to comment. She is assuming the views of a single parent interviewed by the Daily Mail reflect the views of all families.

In my recent book "Youthful Longevity" I share my 20-year journey from a debilitating diagnosis through the minefield of indefinite management of chronic disease to a spontaneous remission miracle. I'd like to send you a free signed copy so we can Make America Healthy Again!

@LeeShoo @JudithMoritz What a hypocrite @JudithMoritz is. She could stay quiet for the sake of the parents but chooses to keep the now farcical 'guilty' narrative alive purely for personal financial gain and yet she has the brass neck to criticise the panel fighting for justice pro bono.

I am not sure where Judith Moritz goes to in the long gaps between her broadcast performances on Lucy Letby, but it’s somewhere well away from media. The non medical evidence was laughed out some time ago. As to “Lucy’s performance in court” trope. Tell us, Judith. How would an innocent person who has been tormented for six years behave? How does this differ from what you saw? How substantive is that difference??. Enough to bang her away for life. Really? are you that confident? Trial by ordeal went out of fashion centuries ago. Fundsmentally Dr Lee shows that there were no crimes. You can’t argue this, but seem to believe that the prosecution’s monstering of Letby shows that it was still her who committed those crimes that didn’t happen. Can you not see a tiny logic problem here? #lucyletby @Overlordmainst1 @sheelanagiggles @LucyLetbyTrials

@LeeShoo @JudithMoritz Moritz just doesn’t want to be convinced by the evidence She has a book that needs to sell

@LeeShoo @JudithMoritz I mean, what does it take for people to realise that ALL that matters is the medical evidence. If there were no murders then there was no murderer. The prosecution case was blown away. It would only matter if there were two opposing credible views.

@LeeShoo @JudithMoritz Oh dear. We're in the "yes there's no medical evidence against her but" zone. Hey @JudithMoritz

@LeeShoo @JudithMoritz My god. @JudithMoritz really wants her to be guilty doesn't she? If there is no medical evidence there is no case.

@LeeShoo @JudithMoritz Also, anyone notice how Moritz had a much easier time being interviewed than Dr Shoo Lee? She wasn't challenged at all.


