Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

New Jersey's Stupid E-Bike & E-Scooter Rules Start This Weekend Starting this weekend (enforcement ramps up around July 19), new licensing, registration, and penalty rules for e-bikes and electric scooters take effect in NJ Key points: •Riders must be 15+ (under 15 = no riding) •Ages 17+: Valid NJ... show more

Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

35,042 subscribers

41,538 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Illinois Democrats are getting ready to force residents to pay registration fees and get insurance on their electric scooters “If you have an e-bike or electric scooter, you will soon have to register it like you would your car” The legislation was rushed through and is already headed to the governor’s desk “Lawmakers talked about the state's first comprehensive framework on electric transportation devices. It would require owners of, say, an e-bike or on an e-scooter that can go faster than 28 miles per hour have a driver's license, title, registration, and insurance. The bill is trying to regulate electric modes of transportation in order to make them safer. The legislation now heads to the governor's desk.” I can’t believe it but it’s real It’s Senate Bill 3336 and related measures like SB 3484, it has passed both chambers of the Illinois General Assembly The bill creates Illinois’ first comprehensive statewide framework for “micromobility” devices, addressing gaps for higher-powered models that current low-speed e-bike rules High-speed devices: E-bikes, electric motorbikes and similar that can exceed 28 mph Owners and operators need: - Valid driver’s license - Title (ownership). 1 Registration (fees apply, similar to vehicles). - Liability insurance. - They are subject to DUI laws and must generally stay on roads All Democrats do is charge you for things that used to be free

Illinois Democrats are getting ready to force residents to pay registration fees and get insurance on their electric scooters “If you have an e-bike or electric scooter, you will soon have to register it like you would your car” The legislation was rushed through and is already headed to the governor’s desk “Lawmakers talked about the state's first comprehensive framework on electric transportation devices. It would require owners of, say, an e-bike or on an e-scooter that can go faster than 28 miles per hour have a driver's license, title, registration, and insurance. The bill is trying to regulate electric modes of transportation in order to make them safer. The legislation now heads to the governor's desk.” I can’t believe it but it’s real It’s Senate Bill 3336 and related measures like SB 3484, it has passed both chambers of the Illinois General Assembly The bill creates Illinois’ first comprehensive statewide framework for “micromobility” devices, addressing gaps for higher-powered models that current low-speed e-bike rules High-speed devices: E-bikes, electric motorbikes and similar that can exceed 28 mph Owners and operators need: - Valid driver’s license - Title (ownership). 1 Registration (fees apply, similar to vehicles). - Liability insurance. - They are subject to DUI laws and must generally stay on roads All Democrats do is charge you for things that used to be free

Wall Street Apes

116,441 views • 2 months ago

Think your e-bike is actually an e-bike? 🚲⚡ Officer Donaldson recently stopped a rider after observing what appeared to be an electric-assisted bicycle traveling more than 30 mph in the bike lane without the rider pedaling. During the stop, the rider explained the bike could be adjusted to different power settings, including one that allowed it to operate without pedaling. Under Washington law, those features can change how the vehicle is classified and what rules apply. As more high-powered e-bikes hit the road, it’s important to know the difference. Not every bike marketed as an e-bike meets Washington’s legal definition of one, and some may actually be classified as electric motorcycles with different licensing, registration and equipment requirements. If you own an e-bike, take a few minutes to make sure you know the rules before you ride. To view an accessible, audio described version of this video, visit: #vanpoliceusa #bodycams

Think your e-bike is actually an e-bike? 🚲⚡ Officer Donaldson recently stopped a rider after observing what appeared to be an electric-assisted bicycle traveling more than 30 mph in the bike lane without the rider pedaling. During the stop, the rider explained the bike could be adjusted to different power settings, including one that allowed it to operate without pedaling. Under Washington law, those features can change how the vehicle is classified and what rules apply. As more high-powered e-bikes hit the road, it’s important to know the difference. Not every bike marketed as an e-bike meets Washington’s legal definition of one, and some may actually be classified as electric motorcycles with different licensing, registration and equipment requirements. If you own an e-bike, take a few minutes to make sure you know the rules before you ride. To view an accessible, audio described version of this video, visit: #vanpoliceusa #bodycams

Vancouver Police USA

501,697 views • 2 months ago

Parents, electric dirt bikes are NOT e-bikes. Walton County Sheriff's Office, Florida is seeing an increase in electric dirt bikes, also called “e-motos”, being ridden in neighborhoods and on public roads. Monday, six of these electric dirt bikes were impounded and citations were issued to juveniles 11-14 years old. Many Do NOT have pedals, have high-powered motors, and are designed only for off-road use. Under Florida law, these vehicles are NOT street legal. It’s illegal to ride electric dirt bikes or "e-motos" on public roads, bike lanes, and sidewalks in Walton County. Driving an unregistered, electric dirt bike on a public road can lead to citations, fines, impoundment, and a mandatory court date. Parents are responsible for making sure e-motos are used legally and safely. Even if it was a gift for Christmas and thought to be an e-bike, many of these are electric dirt bikes and the rules of the road are different. Allowing a child to ride an e-moto on streets or sidewalks puts them and everyone around them at serious risk. E-Bike vs. Electric Dirt Bike or E-Moto ✅ E-Bike: • Has pedals with electric assist • Designed for roads, bike paths, and shared spaces • Typically, lower speeds and requires less protective gear • Less than 750 watts • Can travel 28 mph or less depending on class of bike • Classified as a bicycle 🚫 Electric Dirt Bike / E-Moto: • All throttle • Higher power and higher speeds • Built for off-road terrain only • Requires full protective gear • 750 watts or more • Can travel up to 70 mph • Classified as a motor vehicle ➡️ NOT legal on streets or sidewalks Our goal is education and safety. Not enforcement after something goes horribly wrong and ends in a tragedy. When these e-motos are operated illegally on public roads and sidewalks, enforcement action will be taken. We're here if you need us.

Parents, electric dirt bikes are NOT e-bikes. Walton County Sheriff's Office, Florida is seeing an increase in electric dirt bikes, also called “e-motos”, being ridden in neighborhoods and on public roads. Monday, six of these electric dirt bikes were impounded and citations were issued to juveniles 11-14 years old. Many Do NOT have pedals, have high-powered motors, and are designed only for off-road use. Under Florida law, these vehicles are NOT street legal. It’s illegal to ride electric dirt bikes or "e-motos" on public roads, bike lanes, and sidewalks in Walton County. Driving an unregistered, electric dirt bike on a public road can lead to citations, fines, impoundment, and a mandatory court date. Parents are responsible for making sure e-motos are used legally and safely. Even if it was a gift for Christmas and thought to be an e-bike, many of these are electric dirt bikes and the rules of the road are different. Allowing a child to ride an e-moto on streets or sidewalks puts them and everyone around them at serious risk. E-Bike vs. Electric Dirt Bike or E-Moto ✅ E-Bike: • Has pedals with electric assist • Designed for roads, bike paths, and shared spaces • Typically, lower speeds and requires less protective gear • Less than 750 watts • Can travel 28 mph or less depending on class of bike • Classified as a bicycle 🚫 Electric Dirt Bike / E-Moto: • All throttle • Higher power and higher speeds • Built for off-road terrain only • Requires full protective gear • 750 watts or more • Can travel up to 70 mph • Classified as a motor vehicle ➡️ NOT legal on streets or sidewalks Our goal is education and safety. Not enforcement after something goes horribly wrong and ends in a tragedy. When these e-motos are operated illegally on public roads and sidewalks, enforcement action will be taken. We're here if you need us.

Walton County Sheriff's Office, Florida

24,702 views • 7 months ago

BREAKING 🚨: An Orange County motorcycle cop trolled and calmly narrated his pursuit of a teen who tried to outrun him on an e-bike through Grijalva Park in California. “I would stop if I were you. This is a really, really bad idea.” “We can keep going but it’s a bad idea. Your face is on camera. I know you go to school around here. I’m going to find you. What’s mom and dad going to say when they see your face. when I tell them this?” “I promise I’m a better rider than you too.” “Oh, look, I’m still here. Get off the bike! Get off the bike or we’re gonna have big problems, bud.” The chase ended with the teen cited for nine violations, including evading police, riding unsafely in a park, no helmet, no license plate, no insurance/registration, and operating without a proper license. His e-motorcycle was impounded.

BREAKING 🚨: An Orange County motorcycle cop trolled and calmly narrated his pursuit of a teen who tried to outrun him on an e-bike through Grijalva Park in California. “I would stop if I were you. This is a really, really bad idea.” “We can keep going but it’s a bad idea. Your face is on camera. I know you go to school around here. I’m going to find you. What’s mom and dad going to say when they see your face. when I tell them this?” “I promise I’m a better rider than you too.” “Oh, look, I’m still here. Get off the bike! Get off the bike or we’re gonna have big problems, bud.” The chase ended with the teen cited for nine violations, including evading police, riding unsafely in a park, no helmet, no license plate, no insurance/registration, and operating without a proper license. His e-motorcycle was impounded.

Dr Charlie Ward

202,476 views • 22 days ago

HILARIOUS: An Orange County motorcycle cop trolled and calmly narrated his pursuit of a teen who tried to outrun him on an e-bike through Grijalva Park in California. “I would stop if I were you. This is a really, really bad idea.” “We can keep going but it’s a bad idea. Your face is on camera. I know you go to school around here. I’m going to find you. What’s mom and dad going to say when they see your face. when I tell them this?” “I promise I’m a better rider than you too.” “Oh, look, I’m still here. Get off the bike! Get off the bike or we’re gonna have big problems, bud.” The chase ended with the teen cited for nine violations, including evading police, riding unsafely in a park, no helmet, no license plate, no insurance/registration, and operating without a proper license. His e-motorcycle was impounded.

HILARIOUS: An Orange County motorcycle cop trolled and calmly narrated his pursuit of a teen who tried to outrun him on an e-bike through Grijalva Park in California. “I would stop if I were you. This is a really, really bad idea.” “We can keep going but it’s a bad idea. Your face is on camera. I know you go to school around here. I’m going to find you. What’s mom and dad going to say when they see your face. when I tell them this?” “I promise I’m a better rider than you too.” “Oh, look, I’m still here. Get off the bike! Get off the bike or we’re gonna have big problems, bud.” The chase ended with the teen cited for nine violations, including evading police, riding unsafely in a park, no helmet, no license plate, no insurance/registration, and operating without a proper license. His e-motorcycle was impounded.

RedWave Press

842,582 views • 2 months ago

My take on this is I don’t feel unlicensed teens on E-bikes should be allowed to ride in the streets with oncoming traffic. I see a group of kids blocking the lanes for cars, it was only a matter of time before someone was hurt. These kids were riding in one lane and weaving into another, when this car tried to pass them it looked like one of the riders got too close and tried to swerve and fell. Then the ringleader of the group rides up and damages the car. I think that events like this is why lose drivers despise E-bike riders. The kid filming who damaged the car took down the plate number of the car and wanted them to pay for the damage to the bike that was damaged. I don’t think the car is liable for that. If anything I feel the kids are liable for the damage to the car, who do you feel is at fault here?

My take on this is I don’t feel unlicensed teens on E-bikes should be allowed to ride in the streets with oncoming traffic. I see a group of kids blocking the lanes for cars, it was only a matter of time before someone was hurt. These kids were riding in one lane and weaving into another, when this car tried to pass them it looked like one of the riders got too close and tried to swerve and fell. Then the ringleader of the group rides up and damages the car. I think that events like this is why lose drivers despise E-bike riders. The kid filming who damaged the car took down the plate number of the car and wanted them to pay for the damage to the bike that was damaged. I don’t think the car is liable for that. If anything I feel the kids are liable for the damage to the car, who do you feel is at fault here?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

121,376 views • 3 months ago

Wake Up NJ Speech from Trenton today in the Assembly Appropriations Committee on Bill A5267 How are you doing members of the committee, My name is Michael from Wake Up New Jersey, Bill A5267 means to procure and incentivize transmission-scale energy storage for "renewables" such as solar and wind How is this being funded? Well through your NJ electric bills! Starting July 1st 2027, a "minimum" of $60M will be collected via the societal benefits charges or SBC Might be asking yourself, what's an SBC? When first digging into why our bills were so high in February this year I had no idea, but They are hidden charges in your electric bills to pay for mostly pet projects The Board of Public Utilities or BPU, recommends the SBC funding level for 2025 to be?......anyone here know? It's over $344M per year in our NJ electric bills Why don't we go over a few these programs, Ever Heard of Charge Up New Jersey? It's a program that gives folks up to $4,250 dollars for buying Electric Vehicles and chargers. This is costing NJ residents over $30 million dollars a year in their electric bills How about 'It Pay$ to Plug In', this program has spent $100M since 2012 on EV chargers in your electric Bill! This program cost ratepayers $27M this year alone as an SBC Per year Electric Vehicle Programs total $82.5M, Clean Energy Equity costs us $16.6M, NJ Wind total $22M and Energy Storage is currently costing the rate payers $29.5M per year, just to stress again this bill your voting on today will jump it up to $60M a year at a minimum! More than double it's current total Why is all this in our New Jersey Electric Bills? Want to know the real problem NJ? Democrats here have been pillaging your pockets, nickel and diming you year after year for pet projects in your electric bills. Now with the rake hikes happening, they are frantically trying to steamroll multiple bills in committees in an effort to deflect from the main issue Since 2017 - 6 power plants have closed totaling over half our power here in NJ, Democrats championed coal and nuclear plants being shut down, betting on Windfarms that never happened, this is a huge reason our electric bills are so high here, we need sensible solutions, not a green agenda storage push that caused this mess New Jersey residents pay over $8,100 more per year than the average American Household on their bills and pay around $700 more per month in overall bills compared to the national average My handle receives so many messages, comments, concerns from citizens that are struggling daily, some working 2 to 3 jobs, this state is becoming more unaffordable each and every day, and bills coming out of this Legislature that add to that burden, are not good for the hardworking people of New Jersey We are already hurting with the worst property and corporate taxes, one of the worst income and gas tax rates, and the absolute worst overall tax burden at over 54% of your lifetime earnings being syphoned from our NJ residents How much more do you want to take from us? How do you justify so much money hidden in our electric bills yearly? This endless spending path is unsustainable, we need more money in our pockets, not less Voting yes for this literally raises our electric bills yet again, is that really what you want to do to the people of NJ? Thank you Any questions? Or comments?

Wake Up NJ Speech from Trenton today in the Assembly Appropriations Committee on Bill A5267 How are you doing members of the committee, My name is Michael from Wake Up New Jersey, Bill A5267 means to procure and incentivize transmission-scale energy storage for "renewables" such as solar and wind How is this being funded? Well through your NJ electric bills! Starting July 1st 2027, a "minimum" of $60M will be collected via the societal benefits charges or SBC Might be asking yourself, what's an SBC? When first digging into why our bills were so high in February this year I had no idea, but They are hidden charges in your electric bills to pay for mostly pet projects The Board of Public Utilities or BPU, recommends the SBC funding level for 2025 to be?......anyone here know? It's over $344M per year in our NJ electric bills Why don't we go over a few these programs, Ever Heard of Charge Up New Jersey? It's a program that gives folks up to $4,250 dollars for buying Electric Vehicles and chargers. This is costing NJ residents over $30 million dollars a year in their electric bills How about 'It Pay$ to Plug In', this program has spent $100M since 2012 on EV chargers in your electric Bill! This program cost ratepayers $27M this year alone as an SBC Per year Electric Vehicle Programs total $82.5M, Clean Energy Equity costs us $16.6M, NJ Wind total $22M and Energy Storage is currently costing the rate payers $29.5M per year, just to stress again this bill your voting on today will jump it up to $60M a year at a minimum! More than double it's current total Why is all this in our New Jersey Electric Bills? Want to know the real problem NJ? Democrats here have been pillaging your pockets, nickel and diming you year after year for pet projects in your electric bills. Now with the rake hikes happening, they are frantically trying to steamroll multiple bills in committees in an effort to deflect from the main issue Since 2017 - 6 power plants have closed totaling over half our power here in NJ, Democrats championed coal and nuclear plants being shut down, betting on Windfarms that never happened, this is a huge reason our electric bills are so high here, we need sensible solutions, not a green agenda storage push that caused this mess New Jersey residents pay over $8,100 more per year than the average American Household on their bills and pay around $700 more per month in overall bills compared to the national average My handle receives so many messages, comments, concerns from citizens that are struggling daily, some working 2 to 3 jobs, this state is becoming more unaffordable each and every day, and bills coming out of this Legislature that add to that burden, are not good for the hardworking people of New Jersey We are already hurting with the worst property and corporate taxes, one of the worst income and gas tax rates, and the absolute worst overall tax burden at over 54% of your lifetime earnings being syphoned from our NJ residents How much more do you want to take from us? How do you justify so much money hidden in our electric bills yearly? This endless spending path is unsustainable, we need more money in our pockets, not less Voting yes for this literally raises our electric bills yet again, is that really what you want to do to the people of NJ? Thank you Any questions? Or comments?

Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

145,050 views • 1 year ago

Speaking of cyclists who think the road revolves around them… This guy on the e-bike pulls up to a parked white Lamborghini. His wife already went around like a normal person. There’s clearly space. A kid is literally selling lemonade right there. But instead of doing the obvious thing, he stops, plants his feet, pulls out his phone, and acts like he’s the main character in a movie nobody asked for: “All I’m asking is if you can move your car off the bike lane into this side road. It would take ten seconds!” Bro. You have a bike. You have two legs. You have the easiest workaround in human history and the guy was ready to lewve. But no — he has to be THAT guy. The solo version of the problem. No spandex pack required. Just pure, undiluted “the world must accommodate me” energy. These people don’t ride bikes. They weaponize them. 🚲💀 Go around, Kyle. It’s not that deep.

Speaking of cyclists who think the road revolves around them… This guy on the e-bike pulls up to a parked white Lamborghini. His wife already went around like a normal person. There’s clearly space. A kid is literally selling lemonade right there. But instead of doing the obvious thing, he stops, plants his feet, pulls out his phone, and acts like he’s the main character in a movie nobody asked for: “All I’m asking is if you can move your car off the bike lane into this side road. It would take ten seconds!” Bro. You have a bike. You have two legs. You have the easiest workaround in human history and the guy was ready to lewve. But no — he has to be THAT guy. The solo version of the problem. No spandex pack required. Just pure, undiluted “the world must accommodate me” energy. These people don’t ride bikes. They weaponize them. 🚲💀 Go around, Kyle. It’s not that deep.

DocumentingLibs

129,532 views • 2 months ago

If you would like this to be your new office window, the Speedbird Pilot Academy are open for new applications NOW until the 23rd of April. This is for a fully funded course, which subsequent to completing it successfully, will see you guaranteed a position at British Airways as a pilot. Requirements.. •You'll be 17-58 years of age to apply and 18 years of age to start training •Six GCSEs grade A-C or 4-9, including Maths, English Language and a Science or equivalent qualifications •Fluent in English •A valid passport which permits unrestricted worldwide travel •Your height must be between 1.57m (5'2") and 1.90m (6'3"). If your height is outside of this range, you may be required to undergo a functionality check. •Able to obtain and hold a UK CAA Class 1 medical with no restrictions and meet British Airways medical criteria •Before training starts, you must have completed referencing and pre-employment checks •Have the right to live and work in the UK without sponsorship Reach for the skies (and your dreams!) and apply here: #avgeek #avgeeks #aviation

If you would like this to be your new office window, the Speedbird Pilot Academy are open for new applications NOW until the 23rd of April. This is for a fully funded course, which subsequent to completing it successfully, will see you guaranteed a position at British Airways as a pilot. Requirements.. •You'll be 17-58 years of age to apply and 18 years of age to start training •Six GCSEs grade A-C or 4-9, including Maths, English Language and a Science or equivalent qualifications •Fluent in English •A valid passport which permits unrestricted worldwide travel •Your height must be between 1.57m (5'2") and 1.90m (6'3"). If your height is outside of this range, you may be required to undergo a functionality check. •Able to obtain and hold a UK CAA Class 1 medical with no restrictions and meet British Airways medical criteria •Before training starts, you must have completed referencing and pre-employment checks •Have the right to live and work in the UK without sponsorship Reach for the skies (and your dreams!) and apply here: #avgeek #avgeeks #aviation

James Shepard

65,046 views • 4 months ago

Listen, the link up last weekend was epic! My brother, Ras Baraka, Mayor of Newark, hosted a rally for VP Kamala Harris and invited your girl out to ignite the people around voter registration. It was an honor to be amongst some of our most, caring inspiring and dedicated leaders in NJ government, and to stand next to my community. So, you know what I’m about to ask: ARE YOU REGISTERED TO VOTE? 🤔 No matter who you’re voting for, make sure you’re exercising your power. Check my link in bio for more details. Make sure you know your state deadline and tap your friends/family to make sure they’re #voteready. Let’s get this work done and make history together! Last Day To Register: Wisconsin Wednesday, Oct 16 California Monday, Oct 21 Michigan Monday. Oct 21 Pennsylvania Monday, Oct 21 New York Friday, Oct 25 Hit the link in bio for more registration details.

Listen, the link up last weekend was epic! My brother, Ras Baraka, Mayor of Newark, hosted a rally for VP Kamala Harris and invited your girl out to ignite the people around voter registration. It was an honor to be amongst some of our most, caring inspiring and dedicated leaders in NJ government, and to stand next to my community. So, you know what I’m about to ask: ARE YOU REGISTERED TO VOTE? 🤔 No matter who you’re voting for, make sure you’re exercising your power. Check my link in bio for more details. Make sure you know your state deadline and tap your friends/family to make sure they’re #voteready. Let’s get this work done and make history together! Last Day To Register: Wisconsin Wednesday, Oct 16 California Monday, Oct 21 Michigan Monday. Oct 21 Pennsylvania Monday, Oct 21 New York Friday, Oct 25 Hit the link in bio for more registration details.

Queen Latifah

135,505 views • 1 year ago

We cannot legalize an illegality under the guise of a "hustle." Your hustle must not compromise the rights of others by polluting their environment. We must all join this online campaign to educate the public on the importance of maintaining a clean and healthy environment. All waste from households, companies, and any other garbage-generating establishments must be transported to the designated final disposal site the Dandora dumpsite. We are also developing a waste-to-energy plant at Dandora, which will clear existing waste and transform the area into a more habitable and dignified environment. Anyone earning from or handling waste whether organic, recyclable, e-waste, or any other form of waste must be licensed by the County Government. Waste pickers and recyclers must cease creating unauthorized dumpsites in residential areas under the pretext of sorting or recycling. If you must handle recyclables, it must be done away from residential areas and must fully comply with the required standards. To those criticizing our enforcement efforts online before you condemn, take time to understand why we are doing this. You are welcome to join us during our operations and witness firsthand the suffering endured by residents living near non-compliant sorting centers and material recovery facilities. We must do what is right, no matter the cost. The time to act is now. To those attempting to compromise junior staff and obstruct proper enforcement, be warned: integrity will prevail. Our mission is clear to create a cleaner, greener, and healthier environment for all.

We cannot legalize an illegality under the guise of a "hustle." Your hustle must not compromise the rights of others by polluting their environment. We must all join this online campaign to educate the public on the importance of maintaining a clean and healthy environment. All waste from households, companies, and any other garbage-generating establishments must be transported to the designated final disposal site the Dandora dumpsite. We are also developing a waste-to-energy plant at Dandora, which will clear existing waste and transform the area into a more habitable and dignified environment. Anyone earning from or handling waste whether organic, recyclable, e-waste, or any other form of waste must be licensed by the County Government. Waste pickers and recyclers must cease creating unauthorized dumpsites in residential areas under the pretext of sorting or recycling. If you must handle recyclables, it must be done away from residential areas and must fully comply with the required standards. To those criticizing our enforcement efforts online before you condemn, take time to understand why we are doing this. You are welcome to join us during our operations and witness firsthand the suffering endured by residents living near non-compliant sorting centers and material recovery facilities. We must do what is right, no matter the cost. The time to act is now. To those attempting to compromise junior staff and obstruct proper enforcement, be warned: integrity will prevail. Our mission is clear to create a cleaner, greener, and healthier environment for all.

Geoffrey Mosiria

227,651 views • 1 year ago

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

Giggling Ganon

194,059 views • 2 months ago

Kannadigas are being threatened with penalties and vehicle seizure for not having a rear view mirror, while the same department looks away when Muslims are performing deadly wheeles on the road and ride without helmet. A State that enforces rules selectively is a proof that It is weak on spine. Kanndigas, please know the law and if some scamsters try to loot your bike in name of rules, please tell them this 👇 1) NO REAR VIEW MIRROR Absence of a rear-view mirror is a minor, compoundable offence under the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. ✅ Punishable by fine only ❌ No power to seize the vehicle for this petty offence If a vehicle is otherwise road worthy, detention or seizure is illegal. 2) NO ORIGINAL RC Under Section 130, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, a driver must produce documents on demand. ✅ Digital or photocopy of RC is legally valid ❌ Seizure is NOT permitted merely because the original RC is not carried 3) WHEN CAN A VEHICLE BE SEIZED? Section 207, Motor Vehicles Act applies only if • Vehicle is without registration, OR • Vehicle is without a valid permit, OR • Vehicle is involved in an offence or poses immediate danger None of these apply here 👇 4) PROCEDURE FOR SEIZURE Even if seizure were lawful: • Written seizure memo is compulsory • Grounds must be recorded (No such petty case like, NO MIRROR) • Acknowledgement to owner is mandatory

Kannadigas are being threatened with penalties and vehicle seizure for not having a rear view mirror, while the same department looks away when Muslims are performing deadly wheeles on the road and ride without helmet. A State that enforces rules selectively is a proof that It is weak on spine. Kanndigas, please know the law and if some scamsters try to loot your bike in name of rules, please tell them this 👇 1) NO REAR VIEW MIRROR Absence of a rear-view mirror is a minor, compoundable offence under the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. ✅ Punishable by fine only ❌ No power to seize the vehicle for this petty offence If a vehicle is otherwise road worthy, detention or seizure is illegal. 2) NO ORIGINAL RC Under Section 130, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, a driver must produce documents on demand. ✅ Digital or photocopy of RC is legally valid ❌ Seizure is NOT permitted merely because the original RC is not carried 3) WHEN CAN A VEHICLE BE SEIZED? Section 207, Motor Vehicles Act applies only if • Vehicle is without registration, OR • Vehicle is without a valid permit, OR • Vehicle is involved in an offence or poses immediate danger None of these apply here 👇 4) PROCEDURE FOR SEIZURE Even if seizure were lawful: • Written seizure memo is compulsory • Grounds must be recorded (No such petty case like, NO MIRROR) • Acknowledgement to owner is mandatory

Kiran Aradhya

47,692 views • 6 months ago

Do you ride a bike? Or an e-scooter? Or walk a dog? If so, please take a second to read this. If you are on a bike or scooter on a shared pathway and approaching someone walking a dog, please be courteous and slow down a little. Especially if coming up from behind. I am a wheelchair user with a dog and we have way too many close calls with fast moving bikes and scooters. People not using a bell and whipping by within inches. If the dog turned it's head or stepped a bit wide, they'd be hit. I'll happily move as far to one side of the path as possible, and if I've got the younger dog who isn't as experienced around fast moving things, I'll stop at the very side and have him sit in front of me to give everyone as much space as possible. If I don't know you're approaching, I can't do that. So please, for the love of dog, use your bell. Don't wait until you're right behind someone with a dog. Use it while you're still at a distance, and if you aren't sure they noticed it, ring it a few more times. Give them as much time as possible to move to the side and prepare the dog. If it's a puppy or a dog that hasn't had much experience with bikes, being able to get them off the path or give them a little extra distance from the fast moving bike helps prevent them from getting scared. The vast majority of cyclists are great and really respectful, but there's always a few that aren't. This year the challenge is kids on e-scooters. They are going fast and having fun. Safety isn't at the forefront of their mind. They often don't use a bell or slow down at blind corners, and many don't think about giving the dog any space. I've been startled a few times by them so I can only imagine how the dog felt. This is one of the reasons why I do a lot of desensitization and counter conditioning. Dog owners-you need to do your part to. If you've got headphones on, make sure you can still hear the bike bell. Make sure to give the cyclist or scooter rider as much space as possible from your dog. And of course, unless you are on a designated off leash trail, keep your dog on a leash. If you have a puppy or a newly adopted dog that might not be comfortable around bikes, take some kibble or treats and go hang out with them near a multi use path. Let them watch. As the bike or scooter approaches, drop a few treats on the ground. For many dogs, this is all it takes, but if your dog is visibly stressed, fixated on the bike, or reacting, try moving a further from the trail and once they're comfortable at a slightly further distance, try closer again. If they are still stressed or fearful even with more distance, don't force the issue. Instead introduce them to a bike that isn't moving, and gradually work them up from there. If they are struggling, talk to a trainer. Regardless of if you are holding a leash, riding a bike or scooter, or enjoying a walk outdoors, just be respectful. And of course, be safe. Thanks, Admin 🎥 Puppy walk for cuteness

Do you ride a bike? Or an e-scooter? Or walk a dog? If so, please take a second to read this. If you are on a bike or scooter on a shared pathway and approaching someone walking a dog, please be courteous and slow down a little. Especially if coming up from behind. I am a wheelchair user with a dog and we have way too many close calls with fast moving bikes and scooters. People not using a bell and whipping by within inches. If the dog turned it's head or stepped a bit wide, they'd be hit. I'll happily move as far to one side of the path as possible, and if I've got the younger dog who isn't as experienced around fast moving things, I'll stop at the very side and have him sit in front of me to give everyone as much space as possible. If I don't know you're approaching, I can't do that. So please, for the love of dog, use your bell. Don't wait until you're right behind someone with a dog. Use it while you're still at a distance, and if you aren't sure they noticed it, ring it a few more times. Give them as much time as possible to move to the side and prepare the dog. If it's a puppy or a dog that hasn't had much experience with bikes, being able to get them off the path or give them a little extra distance from the fast moving bike helps prevent them from getting scared. The vast majority of cyclists are great and really respectful, but there's always a few that aren't. This year the challenge is kids on e-scooters. They are going fast and having fun. Safety isn't at the forefront of their mind. They often don't use a bell or slow down at blind corners, and many don't think about giving the dog any space. I've been startled a few times by them so I can only imagine how the dog felt. This is one of the reasons why I do a lot of desensitization and counter conditioning. Dog owners-you need to do your part to. If you've got headphones on, make sure you can still hear the bike bell. Make sure to give the cyclist or scooter rider as much space as possible from your dog. And of course, unless you are on a designated off leash trail, keep your dog on a leash. If you have a puppy or a newly adopted dog that might not be comfortable around bikes, take some kibble or treats and go hang out with them near a multi use path. Let them watch. As the bike or scooter approaches, drop a few treats on the ground. For many dogs, this is all it takes, but if your dog is visibly stressed, fixated on the bike, or reacting, try moving a further from the trail and once they're comfortable at a slightly further distance, try closer again. If they are still stressed or fearful even with more distance, don't force the issue. Instead introduce them to a bike that isn't moving, and gradually work them up from there. If they are struggling, talk to a trainer. Regardless of if you are holding a leash, riding a bike or scooter, or enjoying a walk outdoors, just be respectful. And of course, be safe. Thanks, Admin 🎥 Puppy walk for cuteness

Team Servicerottie🇨🇦🐕‍🦺🦽

15,771 views • 1 month ago

MAJOR RED ALERT: What's sitting in your garage, charging in your bedroom, or parked in your driveway could be a ticking time bomb. You missed the story the corporate media barely covered: Matson, a US shipping giant, just BANNED all electric vehicle shipments after 3 consecutive ship fires. Their reason? The "hazards of lithium-ion batteries." Why should you care? You're not shipping 3,000 cars across the ocean. Because the same technology in those EVs is in YOUR home right now: → Your phone → Your laptop → Your e-bike/scooter → Your Tesla → Your lawn equipment → Your toothbrush → Your kid's toys The stats are terrifying & they're being ignored: 🚨 NYC: Lithium battery fires increased 7X. 🚨 SF: Battery fires more than doubled. 🚨 Nationally: 40+ deaths from e-scooter/bike fires since 2017. 🚨 FAA: 60+ onboard battery incidents this year alone. These fires aren't like normal fires. They're chemical infernos. Once they start, they are often UNSTOPPABLE. Fire departments are often told to just "let them burn." The cause? A single point of failure: ✅ Overcharging ✅ Overheating (leaving an e-bike in the sun) ✅ Physical damage (a simple drop) ✅ Manufacturing defect ✅ Water exposure (flooded EVs burn houses down) This is a direct threat to your family and your home. YOUR ACTION PLAN NOW: 1. STOP overcharging devices. Unplug them once charged. 2. NEVER leave devices (especially e-bikes) charging unattended or overnight. 3. KEEP them out of direct sunlight and away from heat sources. 4. INSPECT batteries regularly for damage, swelling, or punctures. 5. CONSIDER a fire-proof containment bag for larger batteries (e-bikes, scooters). This isn't fear-mongering. It's a public safety emergency happening in silence. The government isn't acting. The media isn't warning you. Your safety is your responsibility. SHARE this to warn everyone you know.

MAJOR RED ALERT: What's sitting in your garage, charging in your bedroom, or parked in your driveway could be a ticking time bomb. You missed the story the corporate media barely covered: Matson, a US shipping giant, just BANNED all electric vehicle shipments after 3 consecutive ship fires. Their reason? The "hazards of lithium-ion batteries." Why should you care? You're not shipping 3,000 cars across the ocean. Because the same technology in those EVs is in YOUR home right now: → Your phone → Your laptop → Your e-bike/scooter → Your Tesla → Your lawn equipment → Your toothbrush → Your kid's toys The stats are terrifying & they're being ignored: 🚨 NYC: Lithium battery fires increased 7X. 🚨 SF: Battery fires more than doubled. 🚨 Nationally: 40+ deaths from e-scooter/bike fires since 2017. 🚨 FAA: 60+ onboard battery incidents this year alone. These fires aren't like normal fires. They're chemical infernos. Once they start, they are often UNSTOPPABLE. Fire departments are often told to just "let them burn." The cause? A single point of failure: ✅ Overcharging ✅ Overheating (leaving an e-bike in the sun) ✅ Physical damage (a simple drop) ✅ Manufacturing defect ✅ Water exposure (flooded EVs burn houses down) This is a direct threat to your family and your home. YOUR ACTION PLAN NOW: 1. STOP overcharging devices. Unplug them once charged. 2. NEVER leave devices (especially e-bikes) charging unattended or overnight. 3. KEEP them out of direct sunlight and away from heat sources. 4. INSPECT batteries regularly for damage, swelling, or punctures. 5. CONSIDER a fire-proof containment bag for larger batteries (e-bikes, scooters). This isn't fear-mongering. It's a public safety emergency happening in silence. The government isn't acting. The media isn't warning you. Your safety is your responsibility. SHARE this to warn everyone you know.

Camus

74,865 views • 1 year ago

Watch the exact moment a traffic stop went from a citation to an arrest over a single piece of plastic. An officer pulls the driver over, stating she failed to come to a complete stop at a stop sign. The driver refuses to physically hand over her driver's license to the officer. Instead, she holds it up so the officer can see the information but refuses to surrender physical possession of the license. She cites a belief that she is not legally required to "hand" the officer her license. The officer repeatedly explains that he needs to hold it to verify it as part of the traffic stop. The driver continues to refuse, and the officer orders her to step out of the vehicle. The driver eventually steps out of the vehicle after a lengthy debate about the law and her rights. The video concludes with the driver outside her vehicle, continuing to argue her legal stance with the officers and getting arrested for resisting and obstructing law enforcement. The Conflict Over "Presenting" a License In Florida, as in many states, the requirement to "present" or "submit" a driver's license is not interpreted as merely showing it from a distance. Law enforcement requires physical possession of the document for several operational reasons: Authentication: Officers must verify the security features of the card (holograms, tactile elements, etc.) to ensure it is not a counterfeit or an altered document. Database Verification: To complete a traffic stop investigation, the officer must run the license through the FCIC/NCIC (Florida Crime Information Center / National Crime Information Center) databases. This check verifies the status of the license (valid, suspended, revoked) and checks for outstanding warrants or other issues. An officer cannot perform this background check without the license number and/or the ability to scan the card. The Charge of "Resisting Without Violence" While the driver may have provided other documentation, the refusal to surrender the driver's license for verification is viewed by law enforcement as a failure to comply with a lawful order during a traffic stop. The Legal Trigger: Under Florida Statute § 843.02, an officer can charge a person with "resisting an officer without violence" if they believe the individual is obstructing them in the "lawful execution of any legal duty." The Interpretation of Obstruction: If an officer determines that the driver's refusal to hand over the license prevents them from completing the mandatory identification and background check, they may consider the driver to be intentionally obstructing their investigation. The Escalation: Even if the driver was cooperative in other aspects, the persistent refusal to comply with the officer’s instruction to hand over the license can lead to a formal detention and, ultimately, an arrest. The arrest is typically made because the officer determines that the driver is willfully impeding their ability to perform their official duties. In court, defense attorneys often argue whether a driver's actions constituted "obstruction" or merely a misunderstanding, but the outcome is highly dependent on the judge's interpretation of whether the driver’s refusal effectively stopped the officer from performing their duties.

Watch the exact moment a traffic stop went from a citation to an arrest over a single piece of plastic. An officer pulls the driver over, stating she failed to come to a complete stop at a stop sign. The driver refuses to physically hand over her driver's license to the officer. Instead, she holds it up so the officer can see the information but refuses to surrender physical possession of the license. She cites a belief that she is not legally required to "hand" the officer her license. The officer repeatedly explains that he needs to hold it to verify it as part of the traffic stop. The driver continues to refuse, and the officer orders her to step out of the vehicle. The driver eventually steps out of the vehicle after a lengthy debate about the law and her rights. The video concludes with the driver outside her vehicle, continuing to argue her legal stance with the officers and getting arrested for resisting and obstructing law enforcement. The Conflict Over "Presenting" a License In Florida, as in many states, the requirement to "present" or "submit" a driver's license is not interpreted as merely showing it from a distance. Law enforcement requires physical possession of the document for several operational reasons: Authentication: Officers must verify the security features of the card (holograms, tactile elements, etc.) to ensure it is not a counterfeit or an altered document. Database Verification: To complete a traffic stop investigation, the officer must run the license through the FCIC/NCIC (Florida Crime Information Center / National Crime Information Center) databases. This check verifies the status of the license (valid, suspended, revoked) and checks for outstanding warrants or other issues. An officer cannot perform this background check without the license number and/or the ability to scan the card. The Charge of "Resisting Without Violence" While the driver may have provided other documentation, the refusal to surrender the driver's license for verification is viewed by law enforcement as a failure to comply with a lawful order during a traffic stop. The Legal Trigger: Under Florida Statute § 843.02, an officer can charge a person with "resisting an officer without violence" if they believe the individual is obstructing them in the "lawful execution of any legal duty." The Interpretation of Obstruction: If an officer determines that the driver's refusal to hand over the license prevents them from completing the mandatory identification and background check, they may consider the driver to be intentionally obstructing their investigation. The Escalation: Even if the driver was cooperative in other aspects, the persistent refusal to comply with the officer’s instruction to hand over the license can lead to a formal detention and, ultimately, an arrest. The arrest is typically made because the officer determines that the driver is willfully impeding their ability to perform their official duties. In court, defense attorneys often argue whether a driver's actions constituted "obstruction" or merely a misunderstanding, but the outcome is highly dependent on the judge's interpretation of whether the driver’s refusal effectively stopped the officer from performing their duties.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

12,859 views • 3 months ago