正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

NEW: Justice Clarence Thomas issues a scathing 91-page dissenting opinion after the Supreme Court struck down President Trump's birthright citizenship order. "The Court today takes the extraordinary step of holding facially unconstitutional the President's Order excluding from citizenship the children of foreign temporary visitors and illegal aliens," Thomas wrote.... show more

Collin Rugg

2,841,616 subscribers

1,271,058 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育健康养生

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 JUST IN: Justice Clarence Thomas SLAMS the Supreme Court decision strike down President Trump's birthright citizenship executive order Thomas writes that the 14th Amendment "was enacted in the wake of the Civil War with the ONE pervading purpose of securing equal citizenship for the FREED SLAVES." He goes on to say that the Court, meaning the majority now, has REPURPOSED the 14th Amendment to protect its own set of preferred rights that the Reconstruction Congress NEVER contemplated, and that CANNOT find support in the text today.

🚨 JUST IN: Justice Clarence Thomas SLAMS the Supreme Court decision strike down President Trump's birthright citizenship executive order Thomas writes that the 14th Amendment "was enacted in the wake of the Civil War with the ONE pervading purpose of securing equal citizenship for the FREED SLAVES." He goes on to say that the Court, meaning the majority now, has REPURPOSED the 14th Amendment to protect its own set of preferred rights that the Reconstruction Congress NEVER contemplated, and that CANNOT find support in the text today.

Nick Sortor

1,985,990 次观看 • 1 个月前

The Supreme Court faces a critical birthright citizenship decision. On January 20th of this year, President Trump signed an order to stop automatic birthright citizenship. The Fourteenth Amendment does not require it. The Fourteenth Amendment gave equal protection and due process. So, if American Indians’ children lacked it under the Fourteenth, why would illegal aliens’ children have it? They don’t.

The Supreme Court faces a critical birthright citizenship decision. On January 20th of this year, President Trump signed an order to stop automatic birthright citizenship. The Fourteenth Amendment does not require it. The Fourteenth Amendment gave equal protection and due process. So, if American Indians’ children lacked it under the Fourteenth, why would illegal aliens’ children have it? They don’t.

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

69,321 次观看 • 8 个月前

Birthright citizenship was never intended for illegal aliens or temporary visitors. The authors of the 14th Amendment explicitly distinguished citizens from those who owed allegiance to a foreign power. The Supreme Court ignored that history. Ryan Helfenbein

Birthright citizenship was never intended for illegal aliens or temporary visitors. The authors of the 14th Amendment explicitly distinguished citizens from those who owed allegiance to a foreign power. The Supreme Court ignored that history. Ryan Helfenbein

Standing for Freedom Center

796,572 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 JESSE WATTERS: SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP in 5-4 ruling, Chief Justice Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett sided with the liberals. President Trump’s challenge rejected. That means babies of illegal aliens, birth tourists, and foreign visitors are automatically American citizens. Justice Clarence Thomas ripped it in a blistering 91-page dissent, saying the 14th Amendment was for freed slaves, not for caravans and scammers. Justice Alito called it one of the biggest mistakes in Court history that will harm America’s future.

🚨 JESSE WATTERS: SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP in 5-4 ruling, Chief Justice Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett sided with the liberals. President Trump’s challenge rejected. That means babies of illegal aliens, birth tourists, and foreign visitors are automatically American citizens. Justice Clarence Thomas ripped it in a blistering 91-page dissent, saying the 14th Amendment was for freed slaves, not for caravans and scammers. Justice Alito called it one of the biggest mistakes in Court history that will harm America’s future.

Gunther Eagleman™

26,935 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 The Supreme Court will rule on the legality of President Trump's executive order to limit birthright citizenship. Watch Rep. Glenn Grothman expose how the 14th Amendment was NEVER intended to grant automatic citizenship to children of illegal aliens:

🚨 The Supreme Court will rule on the legality of President Trump's executive order to limit birthright citizenship. Watch Rep. Glenn Grothman expose how the 14th Amendment was NEVER intended to grant automatic citizenship to children of illegal aliens:

NumbersUSA

16,614 次观看 • 8 个月前

SCOTUS just struck down President Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants and temporary visa holders. The Court reaffirmed the broad 14th Amendment interpretation in a major loss for the administration’s immigration agenda. Congress has the authority to change this through legislation. Ending the filibuster and passing the SAVE America Act would give lawmakers the tools to address birthright citizenship and secure the border for good.

SCOTUS just struck down President Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants and temporary visa holders. The Court reaffirmed the broad 14th Amendment interpretation in a major loss for the administration’s immigration agenda. Congress has the authority to change this through legislation. Ending the filibuster and passing the SAVE America Act would give lawmakers the tools to address birthright citizenship and secure the border for good.

Died Suddenly

24,938 次观看 • 1 个月前

Justice Clarence Thomas lays out his dissent against the Birthright Citizenship decision, stating that the purpose of the 14th amendment was to protect the children of freed slaves- not illegal aliens and tourists. Do you agree?

Justice Clarence Thomas lays out his dissent against the Birthright Citizenship decision, stating that the purpose of the 14th amendment was to protect the children of freed slaves- not illegal aliens and tourists. Do you agree?

Brandon Straka #WalkAway

12,651 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨#BREAKING: The Supreme Court has STRUCK DOWN President Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order, saying the administration CANNOT end automatic citizenship for children of illegal aliens/anchor babies born on U.S. soil. WHAT ON EARTH?!!!! THIS IS ABSURD!!!!!

🚨#BREAKING: The Supreme Court has STRUCK DOWN President Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order, saying the administration CANNOT end automatic citizenship for children of illegal aliens/anchor babies born on U.S. soil. WHAT ON EARTH?!!!! THIS IS ABSURD!!!!!

Matt Van Swol

84,522 次观看 • 1 个月前

Justice Clarence Thomas calling out woke judges after the ruling on birthright citizenship from the Supreme Court. Our country would be a much better place if the entire Supreme Court was full of men like Clarence Thomas. I said what I said.

Justice Clarence Thomas calling out woke judges after the ruling on birthright citizenship from the Supreme Court. Our country would be a much better place if the entire Supreme Court was full of men like Clarence Thomas. I said what I said.

AmericanPapaBear™

57,958 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: Oral arguments in the birthright citizenship case in front of the Supreme Court, with President Trump in attendance, have begun US SOLICITOR GENERAL: "[The 14th amendment] does NOT extend citizenship to illegal aliens. Unlike the slaves, they don't have immediate allegiance to the United States." "Children of temporary visitors are NOT citizens, and illegal aliens lack the legal capacity to establish domicile here." "Unrestricted birthright citizenship CONTRADICTS the practice of the MAJORITY of modern nations."

🚨 BREAKING: Oral arguments in the birthright citizenship case in front of the Supreme Court, with President Trump in attendance, have begun US SOLICITOR GENERAL: "[The 14th amendment] does NOT extend citizenship to illegal aliens. Unlike the slaves, they don't have immediate allegiance to the United States." "Children of temporary visitors are NOT citizens, and illegal aliens lack the legal capacity to establish domicile here." "Unrestricted birthright citizenship CONTRADICTS the practice of the MAJORITY of modern nations."

Nick Sortor

135,737 次观看 • 4 个月前

CLARENCE THOMAS JUST PUBLISHED THE EXACT ARGUMENT FOR WHY THE SUPREME COURT'S BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP RULING IS CONSTITUTIONALLY WRONG Not a political objection. Not a policy disagreement. NAMED HISTORY. SPECIFIC TEXT. Amendment by amendment. 📜 14th Amendment, 1868 — "ONE pervading purpose": securing equal citizenship for FREED SLAVES after the Civil War 📜 Reconstruction Congress intent — zero evidence the drafters contemplated children of foreign temporary visitors or illegal aliens 📜 "Subject to the jurisdiction" clause — Thomas: means full political allegiance, not mere physical presence on US soil 📜 The majority opinion — Thomas says it REPURPOSED the Amendment to protect preferred rights the drafters NEVER contemplated 📜 Thomas's direct quote — those rights "CANNOT find support in the text today" 📜 His warning on the ruling — "I am not sure that today's opinion will stand the test of time" 📜 Thomas during April 2026 oral arguments — probed whether immigration debates even existed when the 14th was written 📜 His core distinction — freed slaves were entitled to citizenship because they were Americans with no other homeland; children of foreign nationals are not in the same category 📜 Roberts and Barrett — joined the liberal bloc in the 6-3 majority in Trump v. Barbara 📜 Gorsuch — joined Thomas in dissent; Alito filed a separate dissent 💀 91 pages 💀 1 purpose the 14th Amendment actually had, per Thomas 💀 ZERO rights the Reconstruction Congress contemplated for children of foreign nationals 💀 100% of Thomas's argument grounded in the specific post-Civil War historical record — not modern policy preference Every argument on this list is anchored in the text and history of the Amendment. Not in what the Court wishes it said. In what the people who wrote it actually intended. The Court's ruling stands. But Thomas put a 91-page marker on the record. Thomas's dissent is still ticking. These are the arguments at the core of it. I'll keep you updated as this unfolds, turn on notifications this is EXTREMELY important.

CLARENCE THOMAS JUST PUBLISHED THE EXACT ARGUMENT FOR WHY THE SUPREME COURT'S BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP RULING IS CONSTITUTIONALLY WRONG Not a political objection. Not a policy disagreement. NAMED HISTORY. SPECIFIC TEXT. Amendment by amendment. 📜 14th Amendment, 1868 — "ONE pervading purpose": securing equal citizenship for FREED SLAVES after the Civil War 📜 Reconstruction Congress intent — zero evidence the drafters contemplated children of foreign temporary visitors or illegal aliens 📜 "Subject to the jurisdiction" clause — Thomas: means full political allegiance, not mere physical presence on US soil 📜 The majority opinion — Thomas says it REPURPOSED the Amendment to protect preferred rights the drafters NEVER contemplated 📜 Thomas's direct quote — those rights "CANNOT find support in the text today" 📜 His warning on the ruling — "I am not sure that today's opinion will stand the test of time" 📜 Thomas during April 2026 oral arguments — probed whether immigration debates even existed when the 14th was written 📜 His core distinction — freed slaves were entitled to citizenship because they were Americans with no other homeland; children of foreign nationals are not in the same category 📜 Roberts and Barrett — joined the liberal bloc in the 6-3 majority in Trump v. Barbara 📜 Gorsuch — joined Thomas in dissent; Alito filed a separate dissent 💀 91 pages 💀 1 purpose the 14th Amendment actually had, per Thomas 💀 ZERO rights the Reconstruction Congress contemplated for children of foreign nationals 💀 100% of Thomas's argument grounded in the specific post-Civil War historical record — not modern policy preference Every argument on this list is anchored in the text and history of the Amendment. Not in what the Court wishes it said. In what the people who wrote it actually intended. The Court's ruling stands. But Thomas put a 91-page marker on the record. Thomas's dissent is still ticking. These are the arguments at the core of it. I'll keep you updated as this unfolds, turn on notifications this is EXTREMELY important.

John Fitzgerald Kennedy Jr.

304,736 次观看 • 9 天前

Birthright citizenship now sits before the Supreme Court. After the Civil War, we guaranteed due process and equal protection with the 14th Amendment. The framers meant birthright citizenship for the children of freed slaves. “Subject to the jurisdiction” has teeth. It means allegiance to the United States. Ambassadors’ kids born here? No citizenship. Invading armies’ kids born here? No citizenship. American Indians did not fall under U.S. jurisdiction for this clause. Congress granted citizenship by statute. So ask the question: if American Indians did not get automatic citizenship under the Fourteenth, how do illegal aliens get it? Answer: they don’t. Thanks for having me, Joe Pags Pagliarulo.

Birthright citizenship now sits before the Supreme Court. After the Civil War, we guaranteed due process and equal protection with the 14th Amendment. The framers meant birthright citizenship for the children of freed slaves. “Subject to the jurisdiction” has teeth. It means allegiance to the United States. Ambassadors’ kids born here? No citizenship. Invading armies’ kids born here? No citizenship. American Indians did not fall under U.S. jurisdiction for this clause. Congress granted citizenship by statute. So ask the question: if American Indians did not get automatic citizenship under the Fourteenth, how do illegal aliens get it? Answer: they don’t. Thanks for having me, Joe Pags Pagliarulo.

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

130,127 次观看 • 8 个月前

.President Donald J. Trump: "We had a very unfortunate decision in the Supreme Court concerning birthright [citizenship]... so we're making adjustments." President Trump is signing two Executive Orders to protect the meaning and value of American citizenship after Trump v. Barbara: — The first Executive Order non-exhaustively identifies certain categories of children of aliens who are not entitled to birthright citizenship consistent with historical exceptions to birthright citizenship recognized by the Supreme Court in Barbara. — The second Executive Order delegates presidential authorities to the Secretary of State and Secretary of Homeland Security and directs them to halt the practice of birth tourism.

.President Donald J. Trump: "We had a very unfortunate decision in the Supreme Court concerning birthright [citizenship]... so we're making adjustments." President Trump is signing two Executive Orders to protect the meaning and value of American citizenship after Trump v. Barbara: — The first Executive Order non-exhaustively identifies certain categories of children of aliens who are not entitled to birthright citizenship consistent with historical exceptions to birthright citizenship recognized by the Supreme Court in Barbara. — The second Executive Order delegates presidential authorities to the Secretary of State and Secretary of Homeland Security and directs them to halt the practice of birth tourism.

Rapid Response 47

2,633,577 次观看 • 12 天前

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump calls on Congress to IMMEDIATELY move to end birthright citizenship for illegal aliens after the Supreme Court ruling — NO constitutional amendment needed LISTEN TO 47! START NOW! 🇺🇸 “The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process.” “No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary!” “Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship. They will have my Complete and Total Support! President DONALD J. TRUMP” NUKE THE FILIBUSTER TO DO IT 🔥

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump calls on Congress to IMMEDIATELY move to end birthright citizenship for illegal aliens after the Supreme Court ruling — NO constitutional amendment needed LISTEN TO 47! START NOW! 🇺🇸 “The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process.” “No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary!” “Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship. They will have my Complete and Total Support! President DONALD J. TRUMP” NUKE THE FILIBUSTER TO DO IT 🔥

Eric Daugherty

226,715 次观看 • 1 个月前

BREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court has BLOCKED President Trump from deploying the National Guard to Chicago, Illinois, to protect federal agents conducting immigration enforcement. The vote was 6-3, with Justice Samuel Alito, Justice Clarence Thomas, and Justice Neil Gorsuch dissenting. “I have serious doubts about the correctness of the court’s views. And I strongly disagree with the manner in which the court has disposed of this application,” Alito wrote in a dissenting opinion.

BREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court has BLOCKED President Trump from deploying the National Guard to Chicago, Illinois, to protect federal agents conducting immigration enforcement. The vote was 6-3, with Justice Samuel Alito, Justice Clarence Thomas, and Justice Neil Gorsuch dissenting. “I have serious doubts about the correctness of the court’s views. And I strongly disagree with the manner in which the court has disposed of this application,” Alito wrote in a dissenting opinion.

RedWave Press

210,581 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 Justice Alito NAILED IT in his birthright citizenship dissent: “This is one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court, and in my judgment, the Court has made a serious mistake.” The 14th Amendment clearly states "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." As Justice Thomas wrote: "Children born to temporary visitors owed allegiance to another government—the country of their domicile—so they were not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States." The logical manifestation of the majority upholding birthright citizenship is that BILLIONS of foreigners -- including from HOSTILE NATIONS -- have instant access to U.S. citizenship for their children. All they must do is set foot on American soil and give birth to a child. No need to stay. This makes precious little sense, and Justice Thomas is correct: "I am not sure that today’s opinion will stand the test of time. The Citizenship Clause 'added greatly to the dignity and glory of American citizenship.' Today’s opinion devalues that citizenship." The Five Fox News ⬇️

🚨 Justice Alito NAILED IT in his birthright citizenship dissent: “This is one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court, and in my judgment, the Court has made a serious mistake.” The 14th Amendment clearly states "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." As Justice Thomas wrote: "Children born to temporary visitors owed allegiance to another government—the country of their domicile—so they were not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States." The logical manifestation of the majority upholding birthright citizenship is that BILLIONS of foreigners -- including from HOSTILE NATIONS -- have instant access to U.S. citizenship for their children. All they must do is set foot on American soil and give birth to a child. No need to stay. This makes precious little sense, and Justice Thomas is correct: "I am not sure that today’s opinion will stand the test of time. The Citizenship Clause 'added greatly to the dignity and glory of American citizenship.' Today’s opinion devalues that citizenship." The Five Fox News ⬇️

Kayleigh McEnany

207,662 次观看 • 1 个月前

The US Supreme Court has blocked President Donald Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship for all individuals born on US soil, ruling that children born in the country remain entitled to citizenship under the Constitution.

The US Supreme Court has blocked President Donald Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship for all individuals born on US soil, ruling that children born in the country remain entitled to citizenship under the Constitution.

Al Jazeera English

56,795 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump calls on Congress to "start TODAY" to work on "ending expensive and unfair" birthright citizenship, after the Supreme Court struck down his executive order to limit the practice. HARRISFAULKNER

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump calls on Congress to "start TODAY" to work on "ending expensive and unfair" birthright citizenship, after the Supreme Court struck down his executive order to limit the practice. HARRISFAULKNER

Outnumbered

10,955 次观看 • 1 个月前

JUST NOW: The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a 6-3 decision upholding automatic birthright citizenship!! Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, ruling that executive orders cannot bypass the current interpretation of the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause. President Trump expressed his dissatisfaction, saying: “The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country. ”

JUST NOW: The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a 6-3 decision upholding automatic birthright citizenship!! Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, ruling that executive orders cannot bypass the current interpretation of the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause. President Trump expressed his dissatisfaction, saying: “The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country. ”

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

81,307 次观看 • 1 个月前