Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

New report: "Thin Ice: Why the UK’s progressive majority could stop Labour’s landslide melting away." Labour’s 2024 win was historic—but fragile. 4 in 10 Labour voters "don't identify as supporters". To secure a decade of renewal, Labour must unite with progressives.

45,190 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

Compass's profile picture
Compass1 year ago

Read more of our report here:

Rob Incognito's profile picture
Rob Incognito1 year ago

Why would progressives ever unite with the side of the party who ratfucked them in 2019? Fuck the Labour Right. They made their bed. They can sleep in it.

Crowsa Luxemburg's profile picture
Crowsa Luxemburg1 year ago

should they... have some progressive policies?

Nick Shepley's profile picture
Nick Shepley1 year ago

It would help if, from 2020 onwards, Labour hadn’t done the daily equivalent of shout: “Go fuck yourselves,” with a megaphone to me and everyone I know.

kildog 🇵🇸 🕊️'s profile picture
kildog 🇵🇸 🕊️1 year ago

Genocide backing, lying, red Tory scum.

Dave Toller #SaveOurNHS's profile picture
Dave Toller #SaveOurNHS1 year ago

Starmer told progressives to leave if they didn't like what he was doing. They left. Starmer hasn't got any more progressive.

The Nerd with the Crystal Plumage ♨️'s profile picture
The Nerd with the Crystal Plumage ♨️1 year ago

Starmer would rather reach out to Reform voters than ever seek to build bridges with the progressives he spent the last few years repeatedly kicking.

Guy (again)'s profile picture
Guy (again)1 year ago

Labour will keep purging people until there's nobody left, progressive policies be damned, look in the mirror

Gareth Nicholas's profile picture
Gareth Nicholas1 year ago

Just spent the last few years smashing the progressives 😬

Related Videos

Thoughts on the Holborn and St Pancras by-election. I find it genuinely fascinating that in a parliamentary seat as diverse as Holborn and St Pancras, only 27,309 people out of 70,457 eligible voters actually voted. That means 43,150 people did not vote, or 61.24%. Labour won the seat, with 12,292 votes. However, this means only 1 in 6 eligible voters chose Labour, or 17.4% of the total eligible electorate. A repeat of the 'loveless landslide' Labour won in 2024, when they won a massive majority even though only 20% of the UK voted for them. Here's the most interesting statistic, In 2024 Keir Starmer received 18,884 votes. Labour's candidate yesterday Sagal Abdi-Wali received 12,292. That is 6,592 fewer votes, a drop of 34.9% on the 2024 Labour total, which confirms Sir John Curtis' observation a few weeks ago that people aren't really taking note of the massive drop in Labour's support, even when they win a by-election. So, Reform might be traversing a manufactured bad patch at the moment, but they have now adopted the ultimate election-winning strategy previously employed by the Lib-Dems - SEATS, NOT VOTES. This is how the Lib Dems were able to win 72 seats in 2024 even though they received less votes than Reform, who only ended up with 5 seats, despite receiving over 500,000 more votes than the Lib Dems. However, fear not my fellow Reformers 🙌 I don't know if you noticed or not, but when Reform announced those two record-breaking donations a few weeks ago, they also announced that they would use the money to hire 400 campaign managers so they could (professionally) target 400 winnable seats. This is how we're going to win the next election my fellow patriots, there are 650 parliamentary constituencies but we only need to win 326 for a parliamentary majority. Ignore the bullshit polls from YouGov etc. By targeting 400 seats which are all absolutely winnable, that gives the party a little bit of leeway, which means even if Reform don't win in over 70 of those seats, Reform still wins a parliamentary majority 🙌💪😃

Mr Knight ✝️ 🇬🇧 ➡️

120,085 views • 3 days ago