Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

NEW - Rubio SHUTS DOWN CBS’ Brennan over intel claims on Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Secretary Marco Rubio wasn’t having it when CBS’ Margaret Brennan tried to steer the narrative. Rubio: “Why do they have a space program? Is Iran going to go to the moon?” “No! They’re trying to... build an ICBM, so they can one day put a warhead on it—” Brennan: “That’s a question of intent, and you know in the intelligence assessment it was that Iran wanted to be a threshold state—” Rubio: “How do you know what the intelligence assessment says? How do you know what the intelligence assessment says?” Brennan: “I’m talking about the public March assessment.” Rubio: “Well, that’s also an inaccurate representation of it. That’s an inaccurate representation of it.” “That’s not how intelligence is read. That’s not how intelligence is used.” Then he dropped the facts: “Here’s what the whole world knows, forget about the intelligence, the IAEA knows, they are enriching uranium WELL beyond anything you need for a civil nuclear program.” “So, why would you enrich uranium at 60%? If you don’t intend to one day use to take it to 90 and build a weapon.” “Why are you developing ICBMs?” “Why do you have 8,000 short range missiles and 2,000–3,000 mid-range missiles that you continue to develop?” “Why do you all these things? They have everything they need for a nuclear weapon. They have the delivery mechanisms. They have the enrichment capability. They have the highly enriched uranium that is stored.” “That’s all we need to see.”show more

Overton

265,416 subscribers

56,793 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Comments

PowderkegProtector1 year ago

That lady can't ask a single simple question. It's always 300 words of barely plausible hypotheticals and "concern."

justmytwosatoshis1 year ago

If you must choose between two options: 1) Bomb Iran now to prevent their potential use of a nuclear weapon, or 2) Bomb Iran after they have already used a nuclear weapon, which is the wiser choice?

PAUL GARCIA1 year ago

CBS HAS TURNED INTO THE "COMMUNIST BROADCAST SYSTEM"! CBS, IT'S OWNERS, MANAGEMENT, AND REPORTERS, HATE AMERICA JUST AS MUCH AS OUR ENEMIES DO! THIS ISN'T REPORTING THE NEWS; THIS IS TRYING TO PROPAGANDIZE THE NEWS!

DP1 year ago

She’s impossible! Fighting with the SOS on intel!

Mr. Skeptic 🧐1 year ago

She is just a political hack at this point

ProudMarineWifeOfficial (Reinstated)1 year ago

Oh, Peggy How you sleeping these days?

Libertarian Party of Orange County1 year ago

@HKarlsborn So much projection

LadyMorgan1 year ago

Warmonger

Zdme “ZDme”1 year ago

bless their hearts so many are blind stupid and unable to see think or rationally perceive the OBVIOUS!

Related Videos

🚨NEW—Marco Rubio OWNS Margaret Brennan Brennan: Cites specious intelligence reports. Rubio: "That's inaccurate...here’s what the whole world needs to know..[Iranians] are enriching uranium well beyond anything you need for a civil nuclear program.. that's all we need to see."

🚨NEW—Marco Rubio OWNS Margaret Brennan Brennan: Cites specious intelligence reports. Rubio: "That's inaccurate...here’s what the whole world needs to know..[Iranians] are enriching uranium well beyond anything you need for a civil nuclear program.. that's all we need to see."

Townhall.com

24,373 views • 1 year ago

Secretary of State Marco Rubio says "it's irrelevant" whether the U.S. had intelligence showing Iran's supreme leader had specifically ordered nuclear weaponization, saying "it doesn't matter whether the order was given. They have everything they need to build nuclear weapons." Rubio later adds, "Forget about intelligence...they are enriching uranium well beyond anything you need for a civil nuclear program."

Secretary of State Marco Rubio says "it's irrelevant" whether the U.S. had intelligence showing Iran's supreme leader had specifically ordered nuclear weaponization, saying "it doesn't matter whether the order was given. They have everything they need to build nuclear weapons." Rubio later adds, "Forget about intelligence...they are enriching uranium well beyond anything you need for a civil nuclear program."

Face The Nation

38,570 views • 1 year ago

🚨Secretary of State Rubio takes Margaret Brennan to school over Iran’s nuclear program: "Why do they have 60% enriched uranium? The only countries in the world that have uranium at 60% are countries that have nuclear weapons because they can quickly make it 90%!"

🚨Secretary of State Rubio takes Margaret Brennan to school over Iran’s nuclear program: "Why do they have 60% enriched uranium? The only countries in the world that have uranium at 60% are countries that have nuclear weapons because they can quickly make it 90%!"

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

28,210 views • 1 year ago

BREAKING 🚨 Secretary of State Marco Rubio just schooled Margaret Brennan to her face on IRAN’s nuclear program RUBIO: "How do YOU know what the intelligence assessment said?” MIC DROP 🔥

BREAKING 🚨 Secretary of State Marco Rubio just schooled Margaret Brennan to her face on IRAN’s nuclear program RUBIO: "How do YOU know what the intelligence assessment said?” MIC DROP 🔥

MAGA Voice

154,306 views • 1 year ago

Rubio teaches Margaret Brennan a lesson on Iran’s nuclear program. “Why do they have 60% enriched uranium? The only countries in the world that have uranium at 60% are countries that have nuclear weapons because they can quickly make it 90%!”

Rubio teaches Margaret Brennan a lesson on Iran’s nuclear program. “Why do they have 60% enriched uranium? The only countries in the world that have uranium at 60% are countries that have nuclear weapons because they can quickly make it 90%!”

Open Source Intel

470,197 views • 1 year ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Rubio says that Iran enriched uranium to 60% to one day push it to 90%. “Why do they have a space program? So they go to the moon? No!”

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Rubio says that Iran enriched uranium to 60% to one day push it to 90%. “Why do they have a space program? So they go to the moon? No!”

Lord Bebo

168,668 views • 1 year ago

Marco Rubio is a phenomenal Secretary of State. "Why would you bury things in a mountain 300ft under the ground? Why do they have 60% enriched uranium. The only countries that have uranium at 60%, are countries that have nuclear weapons." "Why do they have a space program?"

Marco Rubio is a phenomenal Secretary of State. "Why would you bury things in a mountain 300ft under the ground? Why do they have 60% enriched uranium. The only countries that have uranium at 60%, are countries that have nuclear weapons." "Why do they have a space program?"

Thomas Hern

943,663 views • 1 year ago

MUST WATCH: Secretary Marco Rubio schools Margaret Brennan on the Iranian regime's nuclear program. "Why do they have 60% enriched uranium? ... The only countries in the world that have uranium at 60% are countries that have nuclear weapons because they can quickly make it 90%!"

MUST WATCH: Secretary Marco Rubio schools Margaret Brennan on the Iranian regime's nuclear program. "Why do they have 60% enriched uranium? ... The only countries in the world that have uranium at 60% are countries that have nuclear weapons because they can quickly make it 90%!"

Rapid Response 47

2,162,621 views • 1 year ago

Secretary of State Marco Rubio on March 2: "The purpose of this is to destroy that missile capability. Why does Iran want that ballistic missile capability? What they are trying to do and have been trying to do for a very long time is build a conventional weapons capability as a shield where they can hide behind. Meaning there would come a point where they have so many conventional missiles, so many drones, and it can inflict so much damage that no one can do anything about their nuclear program. That is what they were trying to do, is put themselves in a place of immunity where the damage they could inflict on the region would be so high that no one can do anything about their nuclear program or their nuclear ambitions."

Secretary of State Marco Rubio on March 2: "The purpose of this is to destroy that missile capability. Why does Iran want that ballistic missile capability? What they are trying to do and have been trying to do for a very long time is build a conventional weapons capability as a shield where they can hide behind. Meaning there would come a point where they have so many conventional missiles, so many drones, and it can inflict so much damage that no one can do anything about their nuclear program. That is what they were trying to do, is put themselves in a place of immunity where the damage they could inflict on the region would be so high that no one can do anything about their nuclear program or their nuclear ambitions."

Batya Ungar-Sargon

31,216 views • 1 month ago

🚨 SECRETARY MARCO RUBIO JUST TRUTH NUKED THE WHOLE WORLD "They could make our gas $8 a gallon and we wouldn't be able to do ANYTHING about it!" "A nuclear-armed Iran could do whatever the HELL they want with the Straits — and there's NOTHING anyone would be able to do about it!" "And that's one of the many reasons, apart from the massive loss of life and a nuclear strike, why Iran can never have a nuclear weapon." "I mean, so this is an example of if they had a nuclear weapon, they closed the Straits and they would tell the world, what are you going to do about it?!" "We have a nuclear weapon, we can attack you with it. That's the world NONE of us want to leave behind." "It won't happen under this President's watch, but some future President and future Americans will have to deal with this. So just one more example by these guys can never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon." He said it perfectly.

🚨 SECRETARY MARCO RUBIO JUST TRUTH NUKED THE WHOLE WORLD "They could make our gas $8 a gallon and we wouldn't be able to do ANYTHING about it!" "A nuclear-armed Iran could do whatever the HELL they want with the Straits — and there's NOTHING anyone would be able to do about it!" "And that's one of the many reasons, apart from the massive loss of life and a nuclear strike, why Iran can never have a nuclear weapon." "I mean, so this is an example of if they had a nuclear weapon, they closed the Straits and they would tell the world, what are you going to do about it?!" "We have a nuclear weapon, we can attack you with it. That's the world NONE of us want to leave behind." "It won't happen under this President's watch, but some future President and future Americans will have to deal with this. So just one more example by these guys can never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon." He said it perfectly.

Eric Daugherty

2,678,210 views • 3 months ago

Phillip: Why are we bending over backwards to make Iran feel comfortable about signing a deal that actually gives us what we had before and gives them what they did not have? Jennings: You're leaving out the critical piece, which is the document flatly states Iran will not have a nuclear weapon. Phillip: That’s what the JCPOA said. And this document, as we know, says that it reiterates what it has always said which is they are not pursuing a nuclear weapon. Jennings: You believe it? Phillip: No, you don’t believe it. So, why do you believe it now? Jennings: Because we bombed the crap of their uranium enrichment facilities last summer. Setmayer: Apparently not enough.

Phillip: Why are we bending over backwards to make Iran feel comfortable about signing a deal that actually gives us what we had before and gives them what they did not have? Jennings: You're leaving out the critical piece, which is the document flatly states Iran will not have a nuclear weapon. Phillip: That’s what the JCPOA said. And this document, as we know, says that it reiterates what it has always said which is they are not pursuing a nuclear weapon. Jennings: You believe it? Phillip: No, you don’t believe it. So, why do you believe it now? Jennings: Because we bombed the crap of their uranium enrichment facilities last summer. Setmayer: Apparently not enough.

Acyn

379,670 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 RUBIO TO IRAN: TURN OVER THE ENRICHED URANIUM "What they should do is say, we're not gonna have any enrichment capability in our country. Instead, what we're gonna have is a civil nuclear program like dozens of countries around the world have, where we build reactors that create electricity, and we import enriched material. And we've made very general, I'm not gonna get all the details of the offers, but there are other avenues here that would be acceptable to them. If that's what they wanted, if what they want is a civil, peaceful nuclear program, the route has always been there. The problem is that everything they're demanding has nothing to do with a peaceful program. They are all the things you would want if you want to retain the option of one day weaponizing the program." Source: CBS News

🇺🇸🇮🇷 RUBIO TO IRAN: TURN OVER THE ENRICHED URANIUM "What they should do is say, we're not gonna have any enrichment capability in our country. Instead, what we're gonna have is a civil nuclear program like dozens of countries around the world have, where we build reactors that create electricity, and we import enriched material. And we've made very general, I'm not gonna get all the details of the offers, but there are other avenues here that would be acceptable to them. If that's what they wanted, if what they want is a civil, peaceful nuclear program, the route has always been there. The problem is that everything they're demanding has nothing to do with a peaceful program. They are all the things you would want if you want to retain the option of one day weaponizing the program." Source: CBS News

Mario Nawfal

245,668 views • 1 year ago

Rubio on Iran’s enrichment: "Once you know how to enrich at any level, all you need is time to be able to enrich at a higher level. And they've already proven the ability to enrich at a higher level. In fact, they have and are doing so now," US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Tuesday. “They claim that enrichment is a matter of national pride. It is our view that they want enrichment as a deterrent, they believe that it makes them a threshold nuclear power, and as a result, becomes untouchable," Rubio told a Senate committee. "That is the crux of the situation we're facing right now." "Our hope is that we can encourage them to show them a path towards prosperity and peace that allow them to develop their economy, that allow them, if they want, to have a civil nuclear energy program like other countries around the world have - without enrichment."

Rubio on Iran’s enrichment: "Once you know how to enrich at any level, all you need is time to be able to enrich at a higher level. And they've already proven the ability to enrich at a higher level. In fact, they have and are doing so now," US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Tuesday. “They claim that enrichment is a matter of national pride. It is our view that they want enrichment as a deterrent, they believe that it makes them a threshold nuclear power, and as a result, becomes untouchable," Rubio told a Senate committee. "That is the crux of the situation we're facing right now." "Our hope is that we can encourage them to show them a path towards prosperity and peace that allow them to develop their economy, that allow them, if they want, to have a civil nuclear energy program like other countries around the world have - without enrichment."

Open Source Intel

30,334 views • 1 year ago

MUST WATCH: Secretary Marco Rubio explains why Operation Epic Fury is so important: "The purpose of this is to destroy that missile capability. Why does Iran want that ballistic missile capability? What they are trying to do, and have been trying to do for a very long time, is build a convention weapons capability as a shield where they can hide behind — meaning there would come a point where they have so many conventional missiles, so many drones, and can inflict so much damage that no one can do anything about their nuclear program. That is what they were trying to do."

MUST WATCH: Secretary Marco Rubio explains why Operation Epic Fury is so important: "The purpose of this is to destroy that missile capability. Why does Iran want that ballistic missile capability? What they are trying to do, and have been trying to do for a very long time, is build a convention weapons capability as a shield where they can hide behind — meaning there would come a point where they have so many conventional missiles, so many drones, and can inflict so much damage that no one can do anything about their nuclear program. That is what they were trying to do."

Rapid Response 47

357,862 views • 5 months ago

.Secretary Marco Rubio on Iran (May): "Once you're at 60%, you're 90% of the way there. You are, in essence, a threshold nuclear weapon state — which is what Iran basically has become. They are at the threshold of a nuclear weapon. If they decided to do so, they could do so very quickly."

.Secretary Marco Rubio on Iran (May): "Once you're at 60%, you're 90% of the way there. You are, in essence, a threshold nuclear weapon state — which is what Iran basically has become. They are at the threshold of a nuclear weapon. If they decided to do so, they could do so very quickly."

Rapid Response 47

944,133 views • 1 year ago

BREAKING: Secretary Rubio fires back at reporter: "I cannot understand why anyone would think it's a good idea for Iran to ever have a nuclear weapon." "Look what they're doing with the Strait right now. They're holding the whole world hostage." "What do you think they would do if they had a nuclear weapon? They would hold the world hostage with that nuclear weapon. That's what they would do." "I think the president's point is how anyone cannot see that as an unacceptable outcome and an unacceptable risk is beyond him. It's puzzling."

BREAKING: Secretary Rubio fires back at reporter: "I cannot understand why anyone would think it's a good idea for Iran to ever have a nuclear weapon." "Look what they're doing with the Strait right now. They're holding the whole world hostage." "What do you think they would do if they had a nuclear weapon? They would hold the world hostage with that nuclear weapon. That's what they would do." "I think the president's point is how anyone cannot see that as an unacceptable outcome and an unacceptable risk is beyond him. It's puzzling."

Fox News

180,391 views • 3 months ago

ABC’s Mary Bruce: “On the rising oil and gas prices, the President has said that this is a small price to pay for getting rid of a nuclear weapon. But ten weeks in, are we any closer to getting rid of Iran’s nuclear material?” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Yeah, but look, here’s the way to think about Iran. And this is what I described at the very beginning of this. What was Iran’s plan? You have to understand what their plan was. Their plan was they were going to build this conventional shield where they would have so many thousands of missiles and drones and rockets that they couldn’t be attacked. And behind that conventional shield that they were trying to build, they would then break out and do whatever they wanted with their nuclear program. They no longer have that conventional shield, okay? We told you guys from the very beginning, and we’re very consistent in this messaging. The operation that has concluded was going to destroy their navy. They have no navy left. They don’t. Not a navy. They have small boats and Boston Whalers, but they don’t have a navy left. They don’t have an air force. I challenge you. When is the last time you read or heard about an Iranian jet flying anywhere? They don’t have an air force. Their missile launching capability has been substantially degraded. And their industrial base — their defense industrial base has been severely, severely damaged. So, their ability to build a shield behind which they could hide their nuclear program was wiped out. That’s a very substantial achievement. And that was the purpose of this operation from day one.” Bruce: “But do you HAVE to get their nuclear material in order for this war to end?” Rubio: “Well, that’s one of the topics that needs to be discussed. I don’t know about. I think you’re linking it — the operation is over. Epic Fury is — President notified Congress we’re done with that stage of it. Okay. We’re now on to this project of freedom. As far as the negotiation is concerned, I think the President’s been clear that part of the negotiation process has to be not just the enrichment, but what happens to this material that’s buried deep somewhere that they have still have access to if they ever wanted to dig it out, that has to be addressed. And that’s being addressed in the negotiation. I’m not going to go further on what progress has been made on that topic, because I don’t want to endanger the negotiations, but suffice it to say that the President and this entire team is aware of the centrality of that question, and that will have to be addressed one way or the other.”

ABC’s Mary Bruce: “On the rising oil and gas prices, the President has said that this is a small price to pay for getting rid of a nuclear weapon. But ten weeks in, are we any closer to getting rid of Iran’s nuclear material?” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Yeah, but look, here’s the way to think about Iran. And this is what I described at the very beginning of this. What was Iran’s plan? You have to understand what their plan was. Their plan was they were going to build this conventional shield where they would have so many thousands of missiles and drones and rockets that they couldn’t be attacked. And behind that conventional shield that they were trying to build, they would then break out and do whatever they wanted with their nuclear program. They no longer have that conventional shield, okay? We told you guys from the very beginning, and we’re very consistent in this messaging. The operation that has concluded was going to destroy their navy. They have no navy left. They don’t. Not a navy. They have small boats and Boston Whalers, but they don’t have a navy left. They don’t have an air force. I challenge you. When is the last time you read or heard about an Iranian jet flying anywhere? They don’t have an air force. Their missile launching capability has been substantially degraded. And their industrial base — their defense industrial base has been severely, severely damaged. So, their ability to build a shield behind which they could hide their nuclear program was wiped out. That’s a very substantial achievement. And that was the purpose of this operation from day one.” Bruce: “But do you HAVE to get their nuclear material in order for this war to end?” Rubio: “Well, that’s one of the topics that needs to be discussed. I don’t know about. I think you’re linking it — the operation is over. Epic Fury is — President notified Congress we’re done with that stage of it. Okay. We’re now on to this project of freedom. As far as the negotiation is concerned, I think the President’s been clear that part of the negotiation process has to be not just the enrichment, but what happens to this material that’s buried deep somewhere that they have still have access to if they ever wanted to dig it out, that has to be addressed. And that’s being addressed in the negotiation. I’m not going to go further on what progress has been made on that topic, because I don’t want to endanger the negotiations, but suffice it to say that the President and this entire team is aware of the centrality of that question, and that will have to be addressed one way or the other.”

Curtis Houck

51,169 views • 3 months ago

Senator Lindsey Graham just eviscerated his Democrat colleagues for their total failure on Iran. “Why should we listen to you?!” He used Secretary Hegseth’s hearing to HAMMER them for letting Iran become a nuclear threshold state under Obama and Biden. GRAHAM: “Is it possible they could have 60% highly enriched uranium without them cheating in the past?” HEGSETH: “We know in every context of what Iran has undertaken, they've lied and cheated.” GRAHAM: “The answer is no.” “Everything that Obama and Biden did was designed to keep it to civilian nuclear program. There is no way in hell they can have 60% highly enriched uranium unless they cheat.” “So everything y'all did failed! And you want to criticize?” “You failed! You allowed Iran to be a threshold nuclear nation.” “Everything you did failed!” “Missiles to Diego Garcia. Did they shoot missiles at Diego Garcia, General Caine, the Iranians?” CAINE: “Uh, yes sir, they shot a few.” GRAHAM: “Under the protocols we had in place, were they supposed to be able to do that?” CAINE: “Without reviewing the fine print, I believe the answer is no.” GRAHAM: “No they weren't! You failed there!” “You failed to stop Iran from being a nuclear threshold nation, you failed to stop Iran having missiles that could go thousands of miles.” “Why should we listen to you?!” Graham just reminded everyone why Democrats have zero credibility on Iran.

Senator Lindsey Graham just eviscerated his Democrat colleagues for their total failure on Iran. “Why should we listen to you?!” He used Secretary Hegseth’s hearing to HAMMER them for letting Iran become a nuclear threshold state under Obama and Biden. GRAHAM: “Is it possible they could have 60% highly enriched uranium without them cheating in the past?” HEGSETH: “We know in every context of what Iran has undertaken, they've lied and cheated.” GRAHAM: “The answer is no.” “Everything that Obama and Biden did was designed to keep it to civilian nuclear program. There is no way in hell they can have 60% highly enriched uranium unless they cheat.” “So everything y'all did failed! And you want to criticize?” “You failed! You allowed Iran to be a threshold nuclear nation.” “Everything you did failed!” “Missiles to Diego Garcia. Did they shoot missiles at Diego Garcia, General Caine, the Iranians?” CAINE: “Uh, yes sir, they shot a few.” GRAHAM: “Under the protocols we had in place, were they supposed to be able to do that?” CAINE: “Without reviewing the fine print, I believe the answer is no.” GRAHAM: “No they weren't! You failed there!” “You failed to stop Iran from being a nuclear threshold nation, you failed to stop Iran having missiles that could go thousands of miles.” “Why should we listen to you?!” Graham just reminded everyone why Democrats have zero credibility on Iran.

Overton

29,367 views • 3 months ago

"We'll see what Iran decides to do. I think they should choose the route of peace," Secretary of State Marco Rubio says, when asked about what intelligence the U.S. has on Iran's capabilities to retaliate for the U.S. strikes on its nuclear sites. "What happens next will now depend on what Iran chooses to do next. If they choose the path of diplomacy, we're ready," Rubio tells Margaret Brennan. "If they choose another route, then there will be consequences for that."

"We'll see what Iran decides to do. I think they should choose the route of peace," Secretary of State Marco Rubio says, when asked about what intelligence the U.S. has on Iran's capabilities to retaliate for the U.S. strikes on its nuclear sites. "What happens next will now depend on what Iran chooses to do next. If they choose the path of diplomacy, we're ready," Rubio tells Margaret Brennan. "If they choose another route, then there will be consequences for that."

Face The Nation

28,182 views • 1 year ago

🚨 MARCO RUBIO ON PRESIDENT TRUMP'S DEBATE WITH POPE LEO: "What the President basically said is that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon because they would use it against places that have a lot of Catholics and Christians and others for that matter!" "It goes back to the central point. I think the President, without trying to speak for him, but I think I can characterize it this way. He doesn't understand why anybody, leave aside the Pope." "The President and I for that matter, I think most people, I cannot understand why ANYONE would think that it's a good idea for Iran to ever have a nuclear weapon." "Look what they're doing with the Straits right now. They're holding the whole world hostage." "They have these sailors on commercial ships that are going to starve to death out there. They don't care. They don't care that this is melting the economies around the world, even of their own allies." "This is what they're doing with the Straits. What do you think they would do if they had a nuclear weapon? They would hold the world hostage with that nuclear weapon. That's what they would do."

🚨 MARCO RUBIO ON PRESIDENT TRUMP'S DEBATE WITH POPE LEO: "What the President basically said is that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon because they would use it against places that have a lot of Catholics and Christians and others for that matter!" "It goes back to the central point. I think the President, without trying to speak for him, but I think I can characterize it this way. He doesn't understand why anybody, leave aside the Pope." "The President and I for that matter, I think most people, I cannot understand why ANYONE would think that it's a good idea for Iran to ever have a nuclear weapon." "Look what they're doing with the Straits right now. They're holding the whole world hostage." "They have these sailors on commercial ships that are going to starve to death out there. They don't care. They don't care that this is melting the economies around the world, even of their own allies." "This is what they're doing with the Straits. What do you think they would do if they had a nuclear weapon? They would hold the world hostage with that nuclear weapon. That's what they would do."

Eric Daugherty

18,840 views • 3 months ago