Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

NEW: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton explains how Democrats stole the election in 2020 when they stopped counting votes on election night. These are the interviews Tucker would have never been able to have with Fox News 🔥 Paxton explained that vote counting stopped in toss up states so...

2,999,343 views • 3 years ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Tyler's profile picture
Tyler3 years ago

@TPostMillennial Was a very good interview — leaving Fox was the best thing Tucker could have done!

Collin Rugg's profile picture
Collin Rugg3 years ago

@TPostMillennial Yep. Fox would have had a meltdown if Tucker aired something like this.

Western Lensman's profile picture
Western Lensman3 years ago

@TPostMillennial When you see interviews like this, it is easy to understand why X is under assault from every direction. You will not see this anywhere else.

Collin Rugg's profile picture
Collin Rugg3 years ago

@TPostMillennial Exactly. Us common folk aren't allowed to hear things like this.

Paul Hookem's profile picture
Paul Hookem3 years ago

@TPostMillennial Donald Trump loves him some Ken Paxton! 🔥

Paul Hookem's profile picture
Paul Hookem3 years ago

@TPostMillennial

Raynoshi's profile picture
Raynoshi3 years ago

Tucker: Can you just stop counting votes in the middle of the night on election night? Paxton: I've never seen it in my entire life. I knew when Trump was leading in all those states what was going on [...] There's no way of knowing where those extra ballots came from at 3am.

Hot Takes 🔥🥔's profile picture
Hot Takes 🔥🥔3 years ago

@TPostMillennial He might be able to explain in theory, but does he have the evidence?

Collin Rugg's profile picture
Collin Rugg3 years ago

The evidence is in the statistics. Wins 80% of bellwether counties, loses election. Demolishes in toss ups where counting ends on election night (FL, OH), loses in toss up states where counting goes on for days. From a statistical perspective, there is a much higher chance that the election was widely fraudulent than Americans all waking up one day and making a seismic shift in voting trends.

Kyle Reese's profile picture
Kyle Reese3 years ago

@TPostMillennial Little did FOX know at the time when they fired him they were doing us the biggest favor. Love the new format.

Related Videos

The Democrats have stolen an election, yet again. Do not let the mainstream media and the left gaslight you in this moment. They are cheaters. They stole the LA mayoral election. The late mail-in ballot numbers are—quite literally—unbelievable. There is no way that this no-name councilwoman got 22% of the in-person vote on election day (plus the mail-in ballots that arrived before election day) and then magically, organically won DOUBLE this percentage—40-45%—of the late mail-in ballots. Coincidentally, 40-45% was just enough to pass Spencer Pratt...isn't that peculiar? She's losing in her own district as she's getting this enormous amount of votes. I find that to be strange. I also find it strange that there were 12,000 more votes for LA mayor than for California governor... Also, on election day, the in-person voter turnout was actually relatively low and the late mail-in ballots was nearly a record high. Meanwhile, Spencer Pratt—whose fundraising skyrocketed in the days before the election—supposedly completely bottomed out from 30% on election day to 20% of late mail-in ballots?! The left is so audacious, they do not even try to hide it. They know they'll get away with it. This is why they fight tooth and nail against all common sense election integrity laws because they need every single aspect of the election to be chaotic and vulnerable, in order to make their fraud so difficult to detect that it's virtually untraceable. We're supposed to just sit here and believe that Nithya Raman got TWICE the percentage of votes in late mail-in ballots as she did on election day?!

Liz Wheeler

34,487 views • 3 months ago