正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

NEW! The Edge browser now has a "Learning Toolkit" mode 🎓 Make it easy to find #EdgeEDU features! Just type "edge://learning" ➗ Math Solver 📌 Citations 📃 PDF reader 📖 Immersive Reader 🔊 Read Aloud More details: #edtech #MIEExpert #MicrosoftEDU

18,721 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

4 条评论

TricksyBell❣ 的头像
TricksyBell❣3 年前

Nearly as good as edge://surf 🏄‍♀️ 🤣

Javier Boncompte G. 的头像
Javier Boncompte G.3 年前

Are there any coming improvements for ink in PDFs? Like multiple pens, styles, better settings like office, etc?

Ajay 的头像
Ajay3 年前

@MicrosoftEdge

Mike Tholfsen 的头像
Mike Tholfsen3 年前

@MrKavanagh Yup. Not sure if it has rolled to main or still in beta builds there

相关视频

TradingView to Screener & Marketsmith Extension ⚠️Please before asking in comment or DM, how to install, please read the full post, i have given the instructions also, and if you still cant follow it, You will find plenty of video on youtube on how to install the plugin, or ask AI⚠️ 🙏This was a killer timesaver tool for me, Hope it helps all, please share your feedbacks or gratitude in comments, will be sharing more plugin like this in future as well ☑️Overview This Chrome Extension natively integrates with TradingView, adding quick-access buttons to your top chart header. These buttons allow you to instantly view fundamental financial data for the currently active stock symbol on or evaluate it on MarketSmith India. > Features : > Screener New Tab: Opens the consolidated financials page for the current active TradingView symbol in a new browser tab. > Screener Splitscreen: Toggles a bottom-half split screen (iframe) inside the TradingView tab to load the page directly over your charts, letting you perform fundamental and technical analysis synchronously. > Marketsmith New Tab: Opens the stock evaluation page on MarketSmith India for the active symbol in a new tab. > This extension utilizes the Manifest V3 standard APIs and works smoothly across all modern Chromium-based browsers, including: Google Chrome Microsoft Edge Brave Browser Vivaldi Opera Arc Browser ⭐ Installation Instructions (Local/Unpacked) -> 1)Download or keep this entire extension folder on your computer. 1) Download or keep this entire extension folder on your computer: For Google Chrome: type chrome://extensions/ in the address bar. For Microsoft Edge: type edge://extensions/ in the address bar. For Brave: type brave://extensions/ in the address bar. Enable Developer mode using the toggle switch (usually located in the top-right corner). 3) Click the Load unpacked button that appears. 4) In the file explorer popup, choose this exact directory (the folder containing the manifest.json file). 5) The extension is now successfully installed! Open up TradingView to play around with the newly injected buttons in the top header. Github Repo ->

Roshan Kumar

14,810 次观看 • 5 个月前

Experiments in progress. The one on the right has been learning for ~3 hours, the one in the middle for ~1 hour, and the one on the left just started a few minutes ago. The initial motivation for making the physical Atari was just to commit ourselves to a subset of algorithms that can make progress in this setup. This commitment rules out algorithms that require billions of samples to learn (or worse, require multiple environments running in parallel). Atari games are simple enough that we should be able to show learning on them in a short amount of time with no prior knowledge. Since then, I've realized that this setup is also a good way to compare different paradigms in robotics in a principled way. These paradigms are sim2real, learning from tele-operated data, and learning directly on the robots. So far, I have observed that getting sim2real to work reliably is hard. It requires tweaks that don't scale. Policies that can play perfectly in simulation fall apart because of latencies and the messiness of the real world. These aspects could be modeled to improve the simulation, but not without sinking significant human engineering hours. I have higher hopes for learning from tele-operated data, but that requires a human to learn the task first. These experiments are on my to-do list. I have to learn to play some of the games well through the robot. I’m half-decent at playing Pong and Ms Pacman now. Learning directly on robots is looking like the most promising approach. This approach takes away pesky distribution shifts and makes it possible to have algorithms that continually improve with more data and time without any human intervention. It feels great to let experiments run overnight and wake up to find improved policies. With learning on robots, I should, in principle, be able to go on a long vacation and come back to find better policies for complex tasks beyond Atari games. Whether that is possible with current learning algorithms is a different question.

Khurram Javed

52,110 次观看 • 8 个月前

Why You Should Write 1) Putting words on paper freezes your thoughts, which gives your mind space to think deeper about a problem. 2) Writing lets you see if the epiphany you just had is brilliant or total bogus. 3) You want to attract smart people — because smart people read, and smart & successful people read the most. 4) For whatever field you're interested in, if you write about it well, the world's experts will reach out to you. 5) The higher you climb, the more likely you are to write frequently. Every serious executive I know is a voracious reader. Or, as former American president Harry Truman once said: “Not all readers are leaders but all leaders are readers.” 6) Writing accelerates your learning. If you want to understand a topic better, start teaching it. The act of putting ideas into your own words tattoos them into your mind. James Clear once wrote: "If you think you can learn a lot by reading a book, try writing one." 7) The investor Howard Marks once said to me: "In writing, as opposed to speaking, you can't BS. You can't BS in writing because the reader can easily go back and check your work. The logic has to be established. The explanation needs to be clear." 8) It frees up processing space: Mathematicians put their ideas on the whiteboard because jotting down their ideas lets them tackle harder problems. Writing is the same. By putting ideas onto the page, you can transcend the limits of scattered thinking and tackle more challenging problems.

David Perell

99,861 次观看 • 2 年前

Demis Hassabis thinks mathematics has a ceiling. He thinks biology is where we hit it. Hassabis: “Machine learning is the perfect description language for biology in the same way maths is for physics.” He isn’t calling AI a tool. He’s calling it a language. For four hundred years we only had one. Newton wrote gravity in it. Maxwell wrote light. Einstein wrote spacetime itself. Every law we ever pulled out of nature came back in equations, and we decided that meant nature was written in equations. It didn’t mean that. It meant the parts that surrendered first were small enough to fit the language we already spoke. Hassabis: “The expressive power of maths is not enough to understand these highly emergent dynamical systems.” Math can put a planet’s orbit on a single line. It cannot put one protein on a page. Same universe, same laws, and one fits our notation while the other refuses. Weak signals buried under noise, correlations stacked on correlations, more moving parts turning at once than any mind can hold. Biology isn’t harder than physics. It’s more expressive than the tool we brought to it. That was never a gap in our knowledge. It was a wall in our vocabulary. Hassabis is working on the far side of that wall. He calls it a virtual cell. A running simulation of a living system that no equation could ever contain. Hassabis: “Once you learn these simulators, you could maybe extract some equations from that.” He isn’t replacing math. He’s going after math we were never going to reach on our own. The model learns the system the way you learn to catch a ball, without ever solving the equation in the air. Understanding first. Formula after. That reverses the order science has followed since Newton. We started with the equation and used it to predict the system. He starts with the system and pulls the equation out of it. What if the deepest laws of life were always there, fully written, in a language we never learned to read. Math was never the language of the universe. It was the first one we spoke. Every disease we failed to cure is a sentence in that language, sitting in the open, waiting on a reader. Every person we lost to one died on the wrong side of a translation gap. The cell was never silent. We were illiterate. Hassabis isn’t building a better microscope. He’s building a second language for reality. And the first thing it’s learning to say is life.

Dustin

17,368 次观看 • 4 天前

We've all finished a chapter only to realize we can't remember what we just read. This points to something decades of research has confirmed: passive reading is surprisingly ineffective for learning. # The control effect Markant et al. (2014) stripped away different aspects of self-directed learning to find what actually matters. They have found that even just pressing a button when ready to see the next item—with no control over content or duration—significantly enhanced recognition memory. The researchers suggested this works because controlling when you see new information lets you coordinate stimulus presentation with your own attentional state. When you decide when to advance, your brain is better prepared to encode what comes next. # Self-pacing and strategy Tullis and Benjamin (2011) showed that self-paced learners outperformed those who studied for the same total time but couldn't control their pace. The benefit was strongest for learners who spent more time on difficult material—a "discrepancy reduction" strategy. Self-pacing isn't just about having control; it's about using it to allocate attention where it's needed. # Why agency matters DuBrow et al. (2019) found that choice are inherently rewarding. Items learned when participants could make a choice (even an inconsequential one) were remembered better, and there was a correlation between how much someone's preference increased for chosen items and how much their memory improved. Agency engages value-based brain systems that strengthen consolidation. Ding et al. (2021) extended this to incidental memory—showing that even when participants weren't trying to memorize, having control over the task improved later recognition, particularly for items processed quickly. # ChapterPal I programmed ChapterPal to implement these principles: gradual text reveal controlled by the reader, AI-generated comprehension quizzes inserted during reading, regular guess-this-blurred-term puzzles, and contextual Q&A for engaging with difficult passages. The quizzes and puzzles align with research showing that testing and guessing strengthens retention, while the self-paced reveal directly implements the minimal agency sufficient to enhance memory. # References - Tullis & Benjamin (2011). On the effectiveness of self-paced learning. Journal of Memory and Language. - Markant et al. (2014). Deconstructing the effect of self-directed study on episodic memory. Memory & Cognition. - DuBrow et al. (2019). A common mechanism underlying choice's influence on preference and memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. - Ding et al. (2021). The effect of choice on intentional and incidental memory. Learning & Memory. A demo of puzzles and Q&A's on ChapterPal:

BURKOV

39,849 次观看 • 7 个月前

Mark Zuckerberg just argued that AI will force companies to hire more people. Not fewer. Three and a half billion people use Meta every day. Not one of them has a phone number to call. Mark Zuckerberg: “It’s clearly just going to automate jobs and like all these jobs are going to go away… that has not really been how the history of technology has worked.” The entire media cycle runs the same story. AI replaces workers. Industries hollow out. The human becomes unnecessary. History has never once cooperated. Voice support for 3.5 billion daily users costs between ten and twenty billion dollars a year. The math made it untouchable. So Meta never built it. AI changed the math. Zuckerberg: “Let’s say the AI can handle 90 percent of that… you’ve gotten the cost of providing that service down to one 10th.” A service that could not exist becomes standard. Overnight. The moment it goes live, the edge cases arrive. The escalations. The problems no model can close alone. Every one needs a human on the other end. Zuckerberg: “I actually think we’re probably going to go hire more customer support people.” The AI did not kill the jobs. It unlocked a service so vast the company now needs people it never would have hired. When execution costs crater, companies do not pocket the savings. They go after problems they could never afford to touch. New markets. New products. New services that were economically impossible twelve months ago. Every one creates roles that did not exist before the machine arrived. The people terrified of automation are tracking the wrong number. They count the jobs that disappear. They have no framework for the ones that haven’t been invented yet.

Dustin

369,810 次观看 • 4 个月前