Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 🚨 NEW WHITEBOARD Explaining the outrageous Supreme Court decision yesterday: using race in the districting process is bad when it’s remedying discrimination, but perfectly fine when it’s a ruse to gerrymander elections in advance. WATCH 1/

David Pepper

109,033 subscribers

22,511 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

BREAKING: The Supreme Court just struck another blow to fair districts, this time in Alabama. This enabling of another partisan and racial gerrymander by the Court is a new race to the bottom.

BREAKING: The Supreme Court just struck another blow to fair districts, this time in Alabama. This enabling of another partisan and racial gerrymander by the Court is a new race to the bottom.

Senator Adam Schiff

88,901 views • 3 months ago

When the President defies the Supreme Court – that's a constitutional crisis. Due process is afforded to every single person living in our country – that's part of the Constitution and it’s worth defending.

When the President defies the Supreme Court – that's a constitutional crisis. Due process is afforded to every single person living in our country – that's part of the Constitution and it’s worth defending.

Congressman Robert Garcia

65,952 views • 1 year ago

🚨 🚨 NEW Whiteboard on Winning Democracy in the Long Term Who would ever use big money to prioritize statehouses? Um…the Koch Brothers, that’s who. It’s called ALEC and it’s why they’ve been winning. We must do the same. WATCH and RT 1/

🚨 🚨 NEW Whiteboard on Winning Democracy in the Long Term Who would ever use big money to prioritize statehouses? Um…the Koch Brothers, that’s who. It’s called ALEC and it’s why they’ve been winning. We must do the same. WATCH and RT 1/

David Pepper

14,857 views • 1 year ago

🚨 The Supreme Court just ruled that Democrats cannot redraw congressional maps primarily based on race in Louisiana, shutting down another attempt to use identity politics to control elections instead of fair representation. “The Supreme Court made the right decision. If you want to redistrict, you need to redistrict based on reasons outside of race.”

🚨 The Supreme Court just ruled that Democrats cannot redraw congressional maps primarily based on race in Louisiana, shutting down another attempt to use identity politics to control elections instead of fair representation. “The Supreme Court made the right decision. If you want to redistrict, you need to redistrict based on reasons outside of race.”

Brandon Tatum

24,752 views • 3 months ago

🚨 LMFAO! Scott Jennings has a liberal in PANIC MODE, saying it’s “cheating” for the VA Supreme Court to end the Democrat gerrymandering map while red states redraw “How is it cheating?” 😂 Racial discrimination in districts is DONE! They can’t handle it

🚨 LMFAO! Scott Jennings has a liberal in PANIC MODE, saying it’s “cheating” for the VA Supreme Court to end the Democrat gerrymandering map while red states redraw “How is it cheating?” 😂 Racial discrimination in districts is DONE! They can’t handle it

Eric Daugherty

104,828 views • 3 months ago

🚨 🚨 NEW WHITEBOARD A quick whiteboard explaining how the Democrats position on ACA subsidies stops a downward spiral of a spike in both costs and the number of uninsured Americans. No wonder most Americans support our stance. WATCH

🚨 🚨 NEW WHITEBOARD A quick whiteboard explaining how the Democrats position on ACA subsidies stops a downward spiral of a spike in both costs and the number of uninsured Americans. No wonder most Americans support our stance. WATCH

David Pepper

35,560 views • 10 months ago

So when Democrats use IDs to keep their events safe and secure, it’s fine — not racist. But when Republicans want to pass the SAVE America Act that would do the same to secure our elections, suddenly it’s a problem? Ossoff's Office and Chuck Schumer have some explaining to do.

So when Democrats use IDs to keep their events safe and secure, it’s fine — not racist. But when Republicans want to pass the SAVE America Act that would do the same to secure our elections, suddenly it’s a problem? Ossoff's Office and Chuck Schumer have some explaining to do.

Rick Scott

129,018 views • 6 months ago

🚨BIG BREAKING 🚨 It's said that petition is filed in Supreme Court to declare "FREEBIES" given during elections as "BRIBES". Supreme Court has issued notice to the Centre and Election Commission of India. Indeed a remarkable development!!

🚨BIG BREAKING 🚨 It's said that petition is filed in Supreme Court to declare "FREEBIES" given during elections as "BRIBES". Supreme Court has issued notice to the Centre and Election Commission of India. Indeed a remarkable development!!

Mahesh Vikram Hegde 🇮🇳

287,706 views • 1 year ago

A Supreme court that rushes to remove discrimination from the Hindu faith but cowers behind a lamppost like a wet cat when it comes to other faiths, is not a Supreme court, it is a sharia court. The problem is not the standard. The problem is the double standard. My views:

A Supreme court that rushes to remove discrimination from the Hindu faith but cowers behind a lamppost like a wet cat when it comes to other faiths, is not a Supreme court, it is a sharia court. The problem is not the standard. The problem is the double standard. My views:

Anand Ranganathan

77,712 views • 6 months ago

🚨 🚨 NEW WHITEBOARD: Pushing back It’s already starting. Trump pushing terrible policies onto America from Day 1 A key part of stopping them, & turning this around, is to expose how toxic these policies are Last week, a referendum in Kentucky showed the way WATCH & RT 1/

🚨 🚨 NEW WHITEBOARD: Pushing back It’s already starting. Trump pushing terrible policies onto America from Day 1 A key part of stopping them, & turning this around, is to expose how toxic these policies are Last week, a referendum in Kentucky showed the way WATCH & RT 1/

David Pepper

81,321 views • 1 year ago

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz breaks down the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: “The court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution.” Cruz explained: “The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion. And in that opinion, the court vindicated the Constitution of the United States. And in particular the 14th Amendment that ensures that all persons in the United States are entitled to equal protection of the laws, and also the 15th Amendment which protects the right to vote regardless of race. And what the court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution. I think that question is absolutely correct. Uh as Chief Justice Roberts wrote in a previous case, it is a sorted business this divying us up by race. He also said the best way to stop discriminating on race is to stop discriminating based on race. And and I think the court's decision here says our government should be blind to color. We should be colorblind. We should not discriminate in favor of or against any race. I think the Supreme Court is correct and and and that uh that is the result of decades of litigation to to to get these racial gerrymanders struck down.”

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz breaks down the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: “The court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution.” Cruz explained: “The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion. And in that opinion, the court vindicated the Constitution of the United States. And in particular the 14th Amendment that ensures that all persons in the United States are entitled to equal protection of the laws, and also the 15th Amendment which protects the right to vote regardless of race. And what the court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution. I think that question is absolutely correct. Uh as Chief Justice Roberts wrote in a previous case, it is a sorted business this divying us up by race. He also said the best way to stop discriminating on race is to stop discriminating based on race. And and I think the court's decision here says our government should be blind to color. We should be colorblind. We should not discriminate in favor of or against any race. I think the Supreme Court is correct and and and that uh that is the result of decades of litigation to to to get these racial gerrymanders struck down.”

Steve Guest

115,581 views • 3 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: The Virginia Supreme Court is now hearing oral arguments in Virginia's alleged illegal redistricting referendum. Republicans are challenging the Democrat-led process, arguing it violated constitutional and procedural rules A lower court had previously ruled the referendum unconstitutional and blocked certification. The high court’s decision could determine whether the new maps take effect for the 2026 elections.

🚨 BREAKING: The Virginia Supreme Court is now hearing oral arguments in Virginia's alleged illegal redistricting referendum. Republicans are challenging the Democrat-led process, arguing it violated constitutional and procedural rules A lower court had previously ruled the referendum unconstitutional and blocked certification. The high court’s decision could determine whether the new maps take effect for the 2026 elections.

The Patriot Oasis™

118,806 views • 3 months ago

"I think the Supreme Court made the right decision today...a bandaid earlier in the process does not solve the failures early on." Vivek Ramaswamy, the first millennial GOP hopeful, joins Linsey Davis to share his reaction to the Supreme Court ruling on race-based admissions.

"I think the Supreme Court made the right decision today...a bandaid earlier in the process does not solve the failures early on." Vivek Ramaswamy, the first millennial GOP hopeful, joins Linsey Davis to share his reaction to the Supreme Court ruling on race-based admissions.

ABC News Live

91,450 views • 3 years ago

“Romantic love is an addiction — a perfectly wonderful addiction when it’s going well, and a perfectly horrible addiction when it’s going poorly.” In memory of anthropologist Helen Fisher, watch the full version of her TED2008 talk here:

“Romantic love is an addiction — a perfectly wonderful addiction when it’s going well, and a perfectly horrible addiction when it’s going poorly.” In memory of anthropologist Helen Fisher, watch the full version of her TED2008 talk here:

TED Talks

98,563 views • 1 year ago

🚨 PETE BUTTIGIEG JUST MADE THE CASE FOR PACKING THE SUPREME COURT In a new interview, the Democratic candidate stopped short of calling himself a socialist — but still pushed radical institutional change. On the Supreme Court, Buttigieg said: “We could have a Supreme Court that better reflects the expectations of the American people and that is more legitimate… It has come to feel like a nakedly partisan institution.” Translation: The Court is only “illegitimate” when it doesn’t deliver the outcomes the left wants. This is the same argument we’ve heard for years. When they don’t like the rulings, they attack the institution itself. Court-packing isn’t reform. It’s a power play.

🚨 PETE BUTTIGIEG JUST MADE THE CASE FOR PACKING THE SUPREME COURT In a new interview, the Democratic candidate stopped short of calling himself a socialist — but still pushed radical institutional change. On the Supreme Court, Buttigieg said: “We could have a Supreme Court that better reflects the expectations of the American people and that is more legitimate… It has come to feel like a nakedly partisan institution.” Translation: The Court is only “illegitimate” when it doesn’t deliver the outcomes the left wants. This is the same argument we’ve heard for years. When they don’t like the rulings, they attack the institution itself. Court-packing isn’t reform. It’s a power play.

Gunther Eagleman™

45,405 views • 19 days ago

🚨 🚨 WHITEBOARD: Voter Registration Manipulation A 🧵 There is a Death Star hovering over American elections and democracy at the moment A threat as great as any suppression tactic we’ve seen in a long time But one well know in the annals of our history— WATCH & RT 1/

🚨 🚨 WHITEBOARD: Voter Registration Manipulation A 🧵 There is a Death Star hovering over American elections and democracy at the moment A threat as great as any suppression tactic we’ve seen in a long time But one well know in the annals of our history— WATCH & RT 1/

David Pepper

158,174 views • 1 year ago

New max alert 🚨 370 (You een gotta watch the whole thing but just know it’s a process to prepare lol Also I didn’t get too hype in the gym for pulling this)

New max alert 🚨 370 (You een gotta watch the whole thing but just know it’s a process to prepare lol Also I didn’t get too hype in the gym for pulling this)

Jade Onyx Sage🧘🏽‍♀️🕉♑️

23,527 views • 6 months ago

🚨 🚨 NEW WHITEBOARD While the GOP is trying to gaslight the nation on its new round of gerrymandering, the truth is it’s an assault on democracy that mirrors “The Big Lie” effort after November 2020. And should be treated as such. How? WATCH and RT 1/

🚨 🚨 NEW WHITEBOARD While the GOP is trying to gaslight the nation on its new round of gerrymandering, the truth is it’s an assault on democracy that mirrors “The Big Lie” effort after November 2020. And should be treated as such. How? WATCH and RT 1/

David Pepper

33,369 views • 1 year ago