正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

NEWS UPDATE: Another day, ANOTHER EXAM FAILURE? Server failure hits AIIMS Common Recruitment Exam-5 re-examination in Jaipur. Uproar by candidates outside the iON Digital Zone centre. Chaos had also erupted at this same center yesterday during the NEET PG exam. Server failure once again. The exam was scheduled from...

170,196 次观看 • 2 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I'm sure most of us have, at least once in our lives, woken up terrified from a dream where we missed an exam because we were late. We all know that sinking feeling in the pit of the stomach, the panic, helplessness, and regret. That's why this video is so painful to watch. These students missed their NEET after getting stuck in a political rally in Bengaluru. Many would argue that since it wasn't their fault, they should have been allowed to enter. After all, they wouldn't have gained any advantage, they would simply have had less time to write the exam. I understand that sentiment. It comes from a place of empathy, and that's a good thing. But large public exams cannot be run purely on emotions. They require clear, objective, and uniformly enforced rules. The purpose of a reporting-time cutoff isn't to punish late candidates; it's to ensure that every candidate is treated according to the same standard. Once exceptions begin, the rule itself loses meaning. Why allow someone 5 minutes late but not 15? Why make an exception for one reason and not another? Imagine the chaos at thousands of exam centre if you leave entry time to discretion! In exams involving lakhs of candidates, fairness lies not in evaluating individual circumstances but in applying the same rule to everyone without discretion. To add, centers are designed to complete security checks, identity verification, seating, and other protocols before the process begins; late admissions create operational and security complications and undermine confidence in the integrity of the exam. It's heartbreaking for the students. One can sympathize with them and still accept that the authorities were right to enforce the cutoff. Sometimes a decision can be both unfortunate and correct at the same time.

THE SKIN DOCTOR

195,598 次观看 • 2 个月前

𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬'𝐬 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲. In 2024, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra herself admitted that paper leaks had become rampant under the Ashok Gehlot government in Rajasthan and acknowledged that the Congress government had failed to stop them. Take a look at the 2025–26 academic year. Several paper leak and examination malpractice cases have emerged from states governed by the I.N.D.I. Alliance: * Jammu & Kashmir – Service Selection Board Exam * Himachal Pradesh – HP Board Class 12 English * Jharkhand – JAC Class 10 Hindi & Science * Telangana – Intermediate Language Paper * Telangana – SSC Urdu Medium Paper * Tamil Nadu – TNTEU B.Ed Examination * West Bengal – Police Constable Recruitment Exam * Punjab – PSSSB Group B Recruitment Exam * Kerala – PSC-26 Exam Irregularities * Karnataka – SSLC & 2nd PUC Preparatory Exams And this is from one year alone! The contrast is striking. During the Anna Hazare movement, Rahul Gandhi had warned the Parliamentt that a "𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬, 𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐠𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭... 𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐬 𝐚 𝐝𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐲." Today, the same Congress is on the streets championing protests. If Congress and other Opposition parties cannot stop paper leaks where they are in power, what exactly are these protests meant to achieve? In contrast, the BJP government enacted the 𝐏𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜 𝐄𝐱𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 (𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐔𝐧𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐫 𝐌𝐞𝐚𝐧𝐬) 𝐀𝐜𝐭 and strengthened enforcement to crack down on paper leaks, with stringent punishment for those involved in examination malpractice. Post the NEET paper leak, the Modi government responded with decisive action — conducting swift re-examinations, arresting 13 accused in the NEET paper leak case, and further strengthening enforcement to safeguard the integrity of public examinations. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫: 𝐩𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐫𝐞.

BJP

69,770 次观看 • 1 个月前

NEET CANCELLED: A Global Power That Cannot Hold A Fair Exam. In this "RAW DISPATCH FROM MY DESK" i reflect on Twenty-three lakh students or 2.3 million students who will not sleep well tonight in one of the world’s fastest rising powers. Why? Because the government finds it difficult to ensure the integrity of an exam that will decide the course of their lives. Yes, for all its pretensions of being a world power, India cannot hold an exam without the fear of a question paper leak. The NEET exam for 2026 now stands cancelled and the students will be re-tested, re-traumatised. All it took was a paltry sum of Rs 5 lakhs to ensure that cheats got hold of the paper or at least large sections of it that reportedly matched the actual NEET paper “word for word, comma for comma”. The NEET ecosystem has repeatedly faced allegations of leaks, malpractice and compromised integrity over the past decade. Investigators claim that the paper was circulating days before the exam in WhatsApp groups as a “guess paper”. The question is how did a paper allegedly copied at a printing press in Nashik travel across multiple states including Maharashtra, Haryana, Rajasthan, Jammu and Kashmir, Bihar and Kerala without the NTA detecting a single breach? And if the paper is so easily accessed every so often, isn’t it evident that organised rackets have penetrated India’s examination ecosystem under the NTA’s watch? What is surprising is that not one top NTA official has offered to hold him or herself to account. Not one has offered to step down voluntarily. In fact, when the question was repeatedly asked of Abhishek Singh, the DG of the NTA , he was evasive. The point is a simple one: given the scale of its repeated failures, does the NTA understand that every leak destroys not just an exam, but public faith in the idea of fair competition itself? The Modi government prides itself on ensuring that every ordinary Indian gets a level playing field. It must now ask itself whether it is living up to that commitment made to the people.

Rahul Shivshankar

16,250 次观看 • 3 个月前

Minister of State for Home Affairs Bandi Sanjay Kumar at Ashok Nagar- Hyderabad. Likely to proceed to the Secretariat with the TGPSC Aspirants. Let’s Understand what is the issue. Group 1 refers to the top-tier civil service examinations conducted by state public service commissions across India. These exams recruit candidates for senior administrative roles such as Deputy Collectors, DSPs, and other key positions in state governance. In Telangana, the Telangana Public Service Commission (TSPSC) oversees the Group 1 exam. The Telangana Group 1 exams are being conducted after a staggering 13-year gap (last held in 2011, with results declared in 2016). The government has notified 563 posts, including prestigious positions in state administration. Given this long delay, the exam has become extremely competitive, with thousands of aspirants dedicating years to preparation. However, the entire process is now clouded by serious issues regarding fairness, transparency, and procedural irregularities, which have cast a shadow over this crucial recruitment drive. What is G.O. 29? G.O. 29 is a government order from Telangana that changes the eligibility criteria and reservation norms, particularly impacting SC, ST, BC, and EWS categories. This order was issued after the Group 1 exam notification was released, causing widespread concern. Aspirants who were eligible under the previous rules now find themselves potentially disqualified. This abrupt change in reservation policy violates fundamental rights under Articles 15 and 16 of the Constitution, threatening the fairness of the selection process. Students are raising alarms that this could lead to years of legal battles, much like the 2011 Group 1 exam, which was tied up in litigation for several years. Why are they protesting? The protestors argue that G.O. 29 unfairly alters reservation norms mid-process, depriving many eligible candidates of their deserved opportunities. They demand clarity on study materials, as TSPSC declared Telugu Academy books non-standard just 10 days before the exam, despite students relying on them for subjects like Telangana history and geography. Additionally, students are calling attention to police brutality against peaceful protesters, adding another layer of injustice. What are the demands? - as per TGPSC Aspirants 1. No clarity on study materials: TSPSC invalidated Telugu Academy books just days before the exam, leaving students confused. 2. Uncertainty of results: The exam is mired in litigation, leaving students unsure whether their efforts will be recognized or invalidated. 3. Denial of fair reservations: G.O. 29 undermines constitutional guarantees of fair reservation, affecting various categories. The government defends G.O. 29, claiming it aims to align reservation systems with updated policies. However, protestors argue that these changes are unconstitutional and have only caused confusion and distress. The government's failure to communicate clear guidelines has intensified the unrest among students. Court order The Telangana High Court issued an interim order stating that the outcome of the Group 1 exams will depend on the final judgment, which is scheduled for November 20, 2024. This means that even if the exams are conducted, the results could be rendered invalid depending on the court's decision regarding G.O. 29. Students are asking for is a one-month postponement until the court delivers its final decision.

@Coreena Enet Suares

31,350 次观看 • 1 年前