Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🇲🇽🇺🇸 No deal. Talks delayed. And Mexico still thinks this can work. That’s what makes the latest U.S.-Mexico trade negotiations interesting: despite the setback, Mexico isn’t publicly signaling that talks are falling apart. Foreign Minister Roberto Velasco’s “I’m always cautiously optimistic” is careful language, but that caution matters: Mexico...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,923,571 subscribers

39,406 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikFinanzenGesundheit & Wellness
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

4 Kommentare

Profilbild von raffHELL
raffHELLvor 12 Tagen

With how connected both economies are, nobody really wants these talks to collapse

Profilbild von 𝗦𝗛𝗔𝗕𝗕𝗜𝗥
𝗦𝗛𝗔𝗕𝗕𝗜𝗥vor 12 Tagen

Mexico playing the long game. Smart move.

Profilbild von B3a5tc0c
B3a5tc0cvor 12 Tagen

Unlike Canada, Mexico knows where their bread is buttered.

Profilbild von REAL FX 🇺🇸📊
REAL FX 🇺🇸📊vor 12 Tagen

The delay adds uncertainty for businesses on both sides, but Mexico keeping the door open suggests the negotiations are far from over.

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 MEXICO IS BEING FORCED INTO AN IMPOSSIBLE CORNER Footage is flooding in of Mexican military units moving toward the U.S. border — and it’s not happening in a vacuum. President Trump has just reclassified the cartels for what they truly are: Not criminals… but a hostile, armed power operating next door. And that changes everything. The cartels: • control territory • run billion-dollar drug empires • move military-grade weapons • assassinate politicians • and flood the U.S. with narcotics That’s not organized crime. That’s a parallel state. Now Washington is signaling that this is no longer a policing problem — it’s a national-security threat. And Mexico is caught in the middle. If the U.S. moves against the cartels, Mexico faces three brutal realities: Let America act — and expose how little control Mexico truly has Try to block it — and risk confrontation with a superpower Do nothing — and admit the cartels run the country That is why you are seeing troops moving. Not to fight the United States… But because the illusion of sovereignty is cracking. For decades, the cartels grew under protection, corruption, and political cover. Now the reckoning is coming. And when a criminal empire is challenged by a superpower, the entire region feels the shockwave. This is not about borders anymore. It’s about who really controls Mexico.
0:26

🚨 MEXICO IS BEING FORCED INTO AN IMPOSSIBLE CORNER Footage is flooding in of Mexican military units moving toward the U.S. border — and it’s not happening in a vacuum. President Trump has just reclassified the cartels for what they truly are: Not criminals… but a hostile, armed power operating next door. And that changes everything. The cartels: • control territory • run billion-dollar drug empires • move military-grade weapons • assassinate politicians • and flood the U.S. with narcotics That’s not organized crime. That’s a parallel state. Now Washington is signaling that this is no longer a policing problem — it’s a national-security threat. And Mexico is caught in the middle. If the U.S. moves against the cartels, Mexico faces three brutal realities: Let America act — and expose how little control Mexico truly has Try to block it — and risk confrontation with a superpower Do nothing — and admit the cartels run the country That is why you are seeing troops moving. Not to fight the United States… But because the illusion of sovereignty is cracking. For decades, the cartels grew under protection, corruption, and political cover. Now the reckoning is coming. And when a criminal empire is challenged by a superpower, the entire region feels the shockwave. This is not about borders anymore. It’s about who really controls Mexico.

Jim Ferguson

2,796,178 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

"Mexico City is DANGEROUS 💀" American woman claims traveler influencers are LYING about Mexico City "Travel influencers LOVE to say 'don't believe the American propaganda And that Mexico City is safe 🇲🇽 But I was assaulted in a safe area. It's dangerous" Quick thoughts as an American with 9 years in CDMX 👇 1 🇲🇽) While what happened to her sucks, it doesn't define what the norm A vast majority of travel influencers visit Mexico City without problem Yes, there are bad areas and Condesa or Polanco don't represent the whole city But who cares? Most of the audience listening to "travel influencers" won't ever leave the expat areas anyway When this crowd talks about Mexico City, they're talking strictly about the nice areas and there's nothing wrong with that And yes, those areas are safe enough Not as safe as say some place in Switzerland but pretty chill anyway 2 🇲🇽) More broadly speaking though, she's kinda right also The "don't believe American propaganda" line is overused by travel influencers Because the same influencers do in fact make the mistake often of speaking about all of Mexico as if it were just Condesa And it's not propaganda to point out how fucked up Mexico can be outside the touristy areas (it can be VERY fucked up) Even Mexican media REGULARLY shows how fucked up Mexico can be on a daily basis. No shortage of crime and horror stories to report on And no, fucked up areas of the US can't be used to wave away how fucked up Mexico can be And you can't speak for those areas if you, the typical travel influencer, have never been to those areas either If you just stay in Polanco, what would you know about what most of Mexico is like? Nothing 💀
3:05

"Mexico City is DANGEROUS 💀" American woman claims traveler influencers are LYING about Mexico City "Travel influencers LOVE to say 'don't believe the American propaganda And that Mexico City is safe 🇲🇽 But I was assaulted in a safe area. It's dangerous" Quick thoughts as an American with 9 years in CDMX 👇 1 🇲🇽) While what happened to her sucks, it doesn't define what the norm A vast majority of travel influencers visit Mexico City without problem Yes, there are bad areas and Condesa or Polanco don't represent the whole city But who cares? Most of the audience listening to "travel influencers" won't ever leave the expat areas anyway When this crowd talks about Mexico City, they're talking strictly about the nice areas and there's nothing wrong with that And yes, those areas are safe enough Not as safe as say some place in Switzerland but pretty chill anyway 2 🇲🇽) More broadly speaking though, she's kinda right also The "don't believe American propaganda" line is overused by travel influencers Because the same influencers do in fact make the mistake often of speaking about all of Mexico as if it were just Condesa And it's not propaganda to point out how fucked up Mexico can be outside the touristy areas (it can be VERY fucked up) Even Mexican media REGULARLY shows how fucked up Mexico can be on a daily basis. No shortage of crime and horror stories to report on And no, fucked up areas of the US can't be used to wave away how fucked up Mexico can be And you can't speak for those areas if you, the typical travel influencer, have never been to those areas either If you just stay in Polanco, what would you know about what most of Mexico is like? Nothing 💀

Iberian America

47,216 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

My initial thoughts on the deal. There’s no phase two. That's clear to everyone, right? Phase two might happen someday, but it’s unrelated to what’s just been signed. The deal signed now is a hostage release deal. It doesn’t imply anything about the future. Theoretically, fantasies could come true: Emiratis and allies dismantling tunnels, an international body formed, Tony Blair governing Gaza. All this could happen in theory, but it’s not part of the current tactical negotiations. What we have now is a hostage deal, and a ceasefire while talks continue in good faith. There’s the question of course: who decides if talks are happening in good faith? Under Trump, Israel has previously said “Talks aren’t genuine or productive,” and resumed fighting. But this time, I don’t think we’ll see IDF tanks rushing back into Gaza, like what happened when the last two ceasefires ended. The big question is: Are we moving towards the Lebanese model Israel mentioned? In other words, the IDF stays beyond the international border and strikes targets from the air when it detects buildups or threats. Attempts to harm Israel are obvious. But what we’re talking about is buildup efforts, like digging more tunnels or building more arms-producing lathes. This is what Israel is aiming for. The reasonable assumption in Jerusalem is that President Trump will approve it. That’s one point. The IDF will withdraw to the 53% line. It was 57% initially, then dropped to 53% when the hostages will be freed. The talks afterwards are based on the principle of Israeli withdrawal in return for demilitarization and dismantling. Of course, we all assume that Hamas won’t disarm willingly, and the Emiratis and other international forces won’t achieve this quickly either. Now, regarding the hostage issue. I’ll admit than when I hear people say that Israel is “making peace with enemies,” I smell Oslo in the air, and the implications it carries. This isn’t peace, and these are bitter enemies, still on their knees.
2:02

My initial thoughts on the deal. There’s no phase two. That's clear to everyone, right? Phase two might happen someday, but it’s unrelated to what’s just been signed. The deal signed now is a hostage release deal. It doesn’t imply anything about the future. Theoretically, fantasies could come true: Emiratis and allies dismantling tunnels, an international body formed, Tony Blair governing Gaza. All this could happen in theory, but it’s not part of the current tactical negotiations. What we have now is a hostage deal, and a ceasefire while talks continue in good faith. There’s the question of course: who decides if talks are happening in good faith? Under Trump, Israel has previously said “Talks aren’t genuine or productive,” and resumed fighting. But this time, I don’t think we’ll see IDF tanks rushing back into Gaza, like what happened when the last two ceasefires ended. The big question is: Are we moving towards the Lebanese model Israel mentioned? In other words, the IDF stays beyond the international border and strikes targets from the air when it detects buildups or threats. Attempts to harm Israel are obvious. But what we’re talking about is buildup efforts, like digging more tunnels or building more arms-producing lathes. This is what Israel is aiming for. The reasonable assumption in Jerusalem is that President Trump will approve it. That’s one point. The IDF will withdraw to the 53% line. It was 57% initially, then dropped to 53% when the hostages will be freed. The talks afterwards are based on the principle of Israeli withdrawal in return for demilitarization and dismantling. Of course, we all assume that Hamas won’t disarm willingly, and the Emiratis and other international forces won’t achieve this quickly either. Now, regarding the hostage issue. I’ll admit than when I hear people say that Israel is “making peace with enemies,” I smell Oslo in the air, and the implications it carries. This isn’t peace, and these are bitter enemies, still on their knees.

Amit Segal

583,119 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 JUST IN: Vice President JD Vance is departing Switzerland after peace talks with Iran, and this is the kind of moment where every American should understand that the Trump administration is not just talking about peace through strength, it is actively putting serious people in the room to test whether Iran is ready to stop the games. Vance went into these talks with a clear message: America is not going to be trashed, threatened, lied about, or played during negotiations while Iran still expects respect, concessions, and a path forward. That old weakness is gone. The talks happened, the pressure stayed in place, and now the world is watching to see whether Iran chooses compliance, verification, and a real deal, or whether they go back to whining, threatening, and dragging the region toward more chaos. Trump wants peace, but not the Obama kind of peace where America gives everything away and calls it diplomacy. This has to be real. No nukes. No loopholes. No blind trust. Vance leaving Switzerland means the next phase is coming, and 47 still holds the leverage. 🇺🇸
0:40

🚨 JUST IN: Vice President JD Vance is departing Switzerland after peace talks with Iran, and this is the kind of moment where every American should understand that the Trump administration is not just talking about peace through strength, it is actively putting serious people in the room to test whether Iran is ready to stop the games. Vance went into these talks with a clear message: America is not going to be trashed, threatened, lied about, or played during negotiations while Iran still expects respect, concessions, and a path forward. That old weakness is gone. The talks happened, the pressure stayed in place, and now the world is watching to see whether Iran chooses compliance, verification, and a real deal, or whether they go back to whining, threatening, and dragging the region toward more chaos. Trump wants peace, but not the Obama kind of peace where America gives everything away and calls it diplomacy. This has to be real. No nukes. No loopholes. No blind trust. Vance leaving Switzerland means the next phase is coming, and 47 still holds the leverage. 🇺🇸

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

77,046 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Donald Trump’s habit of renaming geographic features rests on a peculiar misunderstanding of how naming actually works. A president can order the Gulf of Mexico called the Gulf of America, or restore Mount McKinley’s old name by decree, but toponymy is not a monarchy. Names persist through use and convention, not through executive orders, and the rest of the world simply keeps calling things what it always has. Mexico still says Gulf of Mexico. Foreign charts, atlases, and everyday speech carry on unbothered, so the whole exercise collapses into theatre rather than policy, a renaming that changes nothing except how self-important the person ordering it looks. What makes this genuinely absurd is the timing. The world is on fire, wars grinding on, alliances fraying, economies under strain, and the man occupying the most consequential office on earth is spending his attention relabeling maps that nobody outside his own government will bother reading differently. It says more about priorities than about geography. Stay connected, Follow Gandalv Gandalv
1:26

Donald Trump’s habit of renaming geographic features rests on a peculiar misunderstanding of how naming actually works. A president can order the Gulf of Mexico called the Gulf of America, or restore Mount McKinley’s old name by decree, but toponymy is not a monarchy. Names persist through use and convention, not through executive orders, and the rest of the world simply keeps calling things what it always has. Mexico still says Gulf of Mexico. Foreign charts, atlases, and everyday speech carry on unbothered, so the whole exercise collapses into theatre rather than policy, a renaming that changes nothing except how self-important the person ordering it looks. What makes this genuinely absurd is the timing. The world is on fire, wars grinding on, alliances fraying, economies under strain, and the man occupying the most consequential office on earth is spending his attention relabeling maps that nobody outside his own government will bother reading differently. It says more about priorities than about geography. Stay connected, Follow Gandalv Gandalv

Gandalv

395,469 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🇮🇱 TECH THURSDAY: GLOBALIZATION IS DYING. ISRAELI TECH COULD BE ONE OF THE BIG WINNERS. (Part of our scheduled content...always pinned) The world is breaking into blocs. Supply chains are collapsing. Wars are redrawing trade routes. Countries are scrambling to bring manufacturing, defense and critical technologies back home. And Israel may be unusually well positioned for what comes next. On the Jerusalem Post’s Defense & Tech podcast, Yoni Heilbon, co-founder and managing partner at IL Ventures, makes a striking argument: Globalization as we knew it is effectively over. What replaces it is a world of technological sovereignty, shortened supply chains and countries increasingly asking one question: What can we no longer afford to depend on someone else for? That is where Israeli tech enters the picture. AI. Robotics. Cybersecurity. Autonomous manufacturing. Supply-chain security. Dual-use technology. Many of these systems were developed under extreme pressure—and some have now been tested in conditions most startups anywhere else in the world could never replicate. But here’s the part that may surprise you: Countries can condemn Israel publicly while quietly continuing to buy Israeli technology behind the scenes. Why? Because when national security, factories, infrastructure and billions of dollars are on the line, politics can suddenly take a back seat to performance. Heilbon believes one of the biggest transformations ahead will be manufacturing itself, as production returns closer to home and automation becomes essential to making that economically possible. And the opportunity for Israeli companies is no longer just America. India. Japan. Europe. Mexico. Brazil. Asia. A fractured world may actually create more demand for the technologies Israel does best. The Startup Nation was built under pressure. Now the rest of the world is entering an age of pressure too. That could change everything. Subscribe to the The Jerusalem Post and its Defense & Tech podcast. Link in comments.
42:32

🇮🇱 TECH THURSDAY: GLOBALIZATION IS DYING. ISRAELI TECH COULD BE ONE OF THE BIG WINNERS. (Part of our scheduled content...always pinned) The world is breaking into blocs. Supply chains are collapsing. Wars are redrawing trade routes. Countries are scrambling to bring manufacturing, defense and critical technologies back home. And Israel may be unusually well positioned for what comes next. On the Jerusalem Post’s Defense & Tech podcast, Yoni Heilbon, co-founder and managing partner at IL Ventures, makes a striking argument: Globalization as we knew it is effectively over. What replaces it is a world of technological sovereignty, shortened supply chains and countries increasingly asking one question: What can we no longer afford to depend on someone else for? That is where Israeli tech enters the picture. AI. Robotics. Cybersecurity. Autonomous manufacturing. Supply-chain security. Dual-use technology. Many of these systems were developed under extreme pressure—and some have now been tested in conditions most startups anywhere else in the world could never replicate. But here’s the part that may surprise you: Countries can condemn Israel publicly while quietly continuing to buy Israeli technology behind the scenes. Why? Because when national security, factories, infrastructure and billions of dollars are on the line, politics can suddenly take a back seat to performance. Heilbon believes one of the biggest transformations ahead will be manufacturing itself, as production returns closer to home and automation becomes essential to making that economically possible. And the opportunity for Israeli companies is no longer just America. India. Japan. Europe. Mexico. Brazil. Asia. A fractured world may actually create more demand for the technologies Israel does best. The Startup Nation was built under pressure. Now the rest of the world is entering an age of pressure too. That could change everything. Subscribe to the The Jerusalem Post and its Defense & Tech podcast. Link in comments.

Mossad Commentary

32,083 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The World Cup is now colliding with the Iran war. FIFA President Gianni Infantino says Iran will play in the U.S. tournament, insisting the team is coming despite the ongoing conflict with the U.S. and Israel, arguing that sports should stay outside politics. But the situation is already unraveling, with Trump saying it would not be appropriate for Iran to attend due to safety concerns, while Iran’s sports minister has gone even further, stating they will not participate under any circumstances. FIFA has already rejected a request to move Iran’s matches to Mexico, and the team remains scheduled to play in Los Angeles and Seattle. What this leaves is a direct standoff between FIFA pushing forward, the U.S. raising security concerns, and Iran signaling it may not show up at all. Politico
2:52

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The World Cup is now colliding with the Iran war. FIFA President Gianni Infantino says Iran will play in the U.S. tournament, insisting the team is coming despite the ongoing conflict with the U.S. and Israel, arguing that sports should stay outside politics. But the situation is already unraveling, with Trump saying it would not be appropriate for Iran to attend due to safety concerns, while Iran’s sports minister has gone even further, stating they will not participate under any circumstances. FIFA has already rejected a request to move Iran’s matches to Mexico, and the team remains scheduled to play in Los Angeles and Seattle. What this leaves is a direct standoff between FIFA pushing forward, the U.S. raising security concerns, and Iran signaling it may not show up at all. Politico

Mario Nawfal

93,477 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇲🇽 🇨🇦 🇨🇺 BREAKING: Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum confirmed this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court ruling has removed the tariff threat against Mexico over oil shipments to Cuba. Asked whether exports would resume, she said her government is reviewing the development and would share an update. Meanwhile, Canada announced Monday that it is preparing a humanitarian aid package for Cuba as the island grapples with acute fuel shortages, prolonged blackouts, and mounting strain on its healthcare system following U.S. measures targeting countries that supply it with oil. Foreign Minister Anita Anand said details are forthcoming and did not clarify what the package would include and whether it would involve fuel. The country is Cuba’s second-largest source of foreign investment, particularly in mining and tourism, Latin Times reported. The announcement comes after Mexico recently shipped more than 800 tons of food and supplies to Havana, and as Cuba’s health minister warns that the energy crisis is disrupting hospital operations and jeopardizing treatment for millions with chronic illnesses. 🎥 Video from President Sheinbaum’s morning briefing, Tuesday, February 24, 2026.
2:21

🇲🇽 🇨🇦 🇨🇺 BREAKING: Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum confirmed this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court ruling has removed the tariff threat against Mexico over oil shipments to Cuba. Asked whether exports would resume, she said her government is reviewing the development and would share an update. Meanwhile, Canada announced Monday that it is preparing a humanitarian aid package for Cuba as the island grapples with acute fuel shortages, prolonged blackouts, and mounting strain on its healthcare system following U.S. measures targeting countries that supply it with oil. Foreign Minister Anita Anand said details are forthcoming and did not clarify what the package would include and whether it would involve fuel. The country is Cuba’s second-largest source of foreign investment, particularly in mining and tourism, Latin Times reported. The announcement comes after Mexico recently shipped more than 800 tons of food and supplies to Havana, and as Cuba’s health minister warns that the energy crisis is disrupting hospital operations and jeopardizing treatment for millions with chronic illnesses. 🎥 Video from President Sheinbaum’s morning briefing, Tuesday, February 24, 2026.

Drop Site

56,638 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran thinks time is running out and so does America. Tehran is still publicly asking Washington for a deal. Former U.S. diplomat and JCPOA negotiator Alan Eyre thinks that’s genuine. Tehran wants sanctions lifted, frozen assets released and a return to something resembling the Islamabad MoU. Trump thinks he can extract more. That creates a dangerous race. Eyre argues Iran knows its economic leverage is strongest before the midterms, which gives Tehran an incentive to intensify pressure now. But America has its own clock. Even with tankers moving through Hormuz under U.S. protection, Eyre says the system cannot simply continue indefinitely. Shipping remains expensive, millions of barrels per day are still missing, and U.S. naval readiness makes permanent escort operations unrealistic. “It’s not sustainable.” That is the part that matters. Washington’s strategy assumes Iran eventually cracks under economic pressure. Iran’s strategy assumes the economic and military cost of containing it eventually becomes intolerable for Washington. Neither side needs to defeat the other outright. They just need the other side’s clock to expire first. Brandon Weichert Alan Eyre
52:16

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran thinks time is running out and so does America. Tehran is still publicly asking Washington for a deal. Former U.S. diplomat and JCPOA negotiator Alan Eyre thinks that’s genuine. Tehran wants sanctions lifted, frozen assets released and a return to something resembling the Islamabad MoU. Trump thinks he can extract more. That creates a dangerous race. Eyre argues Iran knows its economic leverage is strongest before the midterms, which gives Tehran an incentive to intensify pressure now. But America has its own clock. Even with tankers moving through Hormuz under U.S. protection, Eyre says the system cannot simply continue indefinitely. Shipping remains expensive, millions of barrels per day are still missing, and U.S. naval readiness makes permanent escort operations unrealistic. “It’s not sustainable.” That is the part that matters. Washington’s strategy assumes Iran eventually cracks under economic pressure. Iran’s strategy assumes the economic and military cost of containing it eventually becomes intolerable for Washington. Neither side needs to defeat the other outright. They just need the other side’s clock to expire first. Brandon Weichert Alan Eyre

Mario Nawfal

225,668 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just shut down the Iranian regime’s claim that IAEA inspectors will not be allowed into Iran under the U.S. agreement, making it clear that Tehran does not get to rewrite the deal through propaganda after negotiations are already moving forward. “They’re wrong. They know they’re wrong,” Trump said, adding that if Iran’s claim were true, he would cancel the meetings immediately. That is exactly how this has to be handled. No games, no fake statements from the regime, no secret loopholes, and no Obama-style deal where Iran gets benefits while the world is told to just trust them. Trump is saying the inspectors will be on the ground at the appropriate time, which means verification is not optional, inspections are not some side issue, and Iran does not get to take the deal while hiding what it is doing. This is peace through strength. You negotiate, but you verify. You keep the talks alive, but you do not let Tehran control the narrative. President Trump is making it very simple: if Iran wants the agreement, inspectors are part of the deal, and if they try to play games, the meetings can end immediately. 🇺🇸🔥
0:23

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just shut down the Iranian regime’s claim that IAEA inspectors will not be allowed into Iran under the U.S. agreement, making it clear that Tehran does not get to rewrite the deal through propaganda after negotiations are already moving forward. “They’re wrong. They know they’re wrong,” Trump said, adding that if Iran’s claim were true, he would cancel the meetings immediately. That is exactly how this has to be handled. No games, no fake statements from the regime, no secret loopholes, and no Obama-style deal where Iran gets benefits while the world is told to just trust them. Trump is saying the inspectors will be on the ground at the appropriate time, which means verification is not optional, inspections are not some side issue, and Iran does not get to take the deal while hiding what it is doing. This is peace through strength. You negotiate, but you verify. You keep the talks alive, but you do not let Tehran control the narrative. President Trump is making it very simple: if Iran wants the agreement, inspectors are part of the deal, and if they try to play games, the meetings can end immediately. 🇺🇸🔥

Tironianae 🍊🍊 Z. - Ultra Verbum Vincet

142,107 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just shut down the Iranian regime’s claim that IAEA inspectors will not be allowed into Iran under the U.S. agreement, making it clear that Tehran does not get to rewrite the deal through propaganda after negotiations are already moving forward. “They’re wrong. They know they’re wrong,” Trump said, adding that if Iran’s claim were true, he would cancel the meetings immediately. That is exactly how this has to be handled. No games, no fake statements from the regime, no secret loopholes, and no Obama-style deal where Iran gets benefits while the world is told to just trust them. Trump is saying the inspectors will be on the ground at the appropriate time, which means verification is not optional, inspections are not some side issue, and Iran does not get to take the deal while hiding what it is doing. This is peace through strength. You negotiate, but you verify. You keep the talks alive, but you do not let Tehran control the narrative. President Trump is making it very simple: if Iran wants the agreement, inspectors are part of the deal, and if they try to play games, the meetings can end immediately. 🇺🇸🔥
0:23

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just shut down the Iranian regime’s claim that IAEA inspectors will not be allowed into Iran under the U.S. agreement, making it clear that Tehran does not get to rewrite the deal through propaganda after negotiations are already moving forward. “They’re wrong. They know they’re wrong,” Trump said, adding that if Iran’s claim were true, he would cancel the meetings immediately. That is exactly how this has to be handled. No games, no fake statements from the regime, no secret loopholes, and no Obama-style deal where Iran gets benefits while the world is told to just trust them. Trump is saying the inspectors will be on the ground at the appropriate time, which means verification is not optional, inspections are not some side issue, and Iran does not get to take the deal while hiding what it is doing. This is peace through strength. You negotiate, but you verify. You keep the talks alive, but you do not let Tehran control the narrative. President Trump is making it very simple: if Iran wants the agreement, inspectors are part of the deal, and if they try to play games, the meetings can end immediately. 🇺🇸🔥

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

150,177 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🇺🇸🇲🇽 We've been following how DRONES are changing MODERN WARFARE for years But one of the more interesting testing grounds turns out to be the U.S.-MEXICO BORDER The military detected 378 drone incursions there in just 30 days. Most aren’t sophisticated military systems. They’re cheap commercial drones being used by cartels to watch the border during smuggling and trafficking operations. And now the Army is effectively using that problem as a live laboratory. Radars, interceptor drones, autonomous guns and other counter-drone systems are being tested in Arizona. The military says it has already shot down 11 cartel drones with lasers since August. What really caught me is where the Army says the inspiration is coming from: Ukraine. The technology is different. The threat is different. But the lesson is the same: cheap drones evolve ridiculously quickly, and waiting years to develop the perfect countermeasure simply doesn’t work. The drone revolution didn’t stay on the battlefield very long. Source: Reuters / Writer: Oliver
0:45

🇺🇸🇲🇽 We've been following how DRONES are changing MODERN WARFARE for years But one of the more interesting testing grounds turns out to be the U.S.-MEXICO BORDER The military detected 378 drone incursions there in just 30 days. Most aren’t sophisticated military systems. They’re cheap commercial drones being used by cartels to watch the border during smuggling and trafficking operations. And now the Army is effectively using that problem as a live laboratory. Radars, interceptor drones, autonomous guns and other counter-drone systems are being tested in Arizona. The military says it has already shot down 11 cartel drones with lasers since August. What really caught me is where the Army says the inspiration is coming from: Ukraine. The technology is different. The threat is different. But the lesson is the same: cheap drones evolve ridiculously quickly, and waiting years to develop the perfect countermeasure simply doesn’t work. The drone revolution didn’t stay on the battlefield very long. Source: Reuters / Writer: Oliver

Mario Nawfal

28,476 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

🚨 OPERATIONAL UPDATE: TALKS FAIL, PRESSURE CONTINUES - Reporting Window: Last 24 Hours The diplomatic track did not produce a result in this window. After extended, high-level negotiations in Islamabad, the United States and Iran left without an agreement, despite what both sides described as a final round of talks. At the same time, Lebanon remains active, the Strait of Hormuz is still unresolved, and the broader regional pressure structure has not changed. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🇵🇰 ISLAMABAD TALKS: FAILED ROUND, NOT A BREAKTHROUGH The most important development in this window is straightforward: • U.S. and Iranian delegations held 21 hours of direct talks • No agreement was reached • Both sides left without accepting terms • Each side blamed the other The core issues did not move: • U.S. demands: nuclear rollback and unrestricted access to the Strait of Hormuz • Iranian demands: sanctions relief, reparations, control over Hormuz, and a regional ceasefire including Lebanon Those positions remain fundamentally incompatible. At its core, this is not just a ceasefire negotiation. It is a negotiation over Iran’s long-term ability to project power: • The U.S. is pushing to dismantle that capability, including nuclear, missile, and proxy elements • Iran is trying to preserve enough of it to remain a regional power Both sides are still signaling willingness to continue talks, but this round produced no progress. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🇱🇧 LEBANON: CONTINUED STRIKES, NO LINK TO CEASEFIRE Lebanon remains the most active battlefield and was not affected by the failed negotiations. Israeli strikes continued across southern Lebanon, with reporting confirming: • Multiple strike waves across southern towns • At least 11 killed in recent operations • Continued targeting of Hezbollah infrastructure and positions At the same time, Hezbollah continues: • Intermittent rocket fire toward Israel • Ongoing clashes along the border This reinforces the established fact that there is no operational pause in Lebanon. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚓ STRAIT OF HORMUZ: NAVAL MOVEMENTS AND PARTIAL OPENING The most important operational shift in this window is in the Strait itself. Two U.S. Navy destroyers transited the Strait of Hormuz, tied to planned mine-clearing operations. Three supertankers successfully exited the Gulf, while hundreds remain queued, and Iran continues to signal control and leverage over access. At the same time, the U.S. has now moved beyond signaling: • President Trump announced the Navy will interdict vessels that pay tolls to Iran • He indicated a willingness to impose a de facto blockade of the Strait • The stated objective is to eliminate Iran’s ability to monetize or control passage This creates a new reality: • Hormuz is not fully closed • It is not fully open • It is now becoming an actively contested maritime zone ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌍 GLOBAL ENERGY RESPONSE Markets are already adapting to the disruption. • Tankers are rerouting away from the Gulf • U.S. exports are rising toward record levels • Gulf Coast refineries are running near capacity • Major buyers are competing for non-Gulf supply The effect is clear. Iran disrupted supply, the global market began rerouting around it, that does not remove Iran’s leverage. It limits how long that leverage can be sustained. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📌 WHAT MATTERS MOST RIGHT NOW • U.S.–Iran talks failed to produce an agreement • Both sides left Islamabad without accepting terms, though talks may continue • Lebanon remains an active battlefield, with continued Israeli strikes and Hezbollah fire • The U.S. has begun direct naval movement through Hormuz, including destroyer transits and upcoming mine-clearing operations • Shipping is partially resuming, but the Strait remains unstable and contested ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧠 ASSESSMENT This was a real negotiation attempt. It failed. And the reason it failed is becoming clearer. Iran continues to negotiate as if it holds structural leverage over the outcome. The battlefield suggests otherwise. Its position is weaker than its posture. But it is not without leverage. That leverage is concentrated in two places: • The ability to disrupt Hormuz and global energy flow • The ability to keep secondary fronts, especially Lebanon, active The first creates economic pressure. The second prevents clean diplomatic separation. At the same time, the United States is signaling something equally important: It is willing to test those limits directly. Naval transits through Hormuz are not symbolic. They are the early stages of forcing open the most important pressure point Iran still holds. That is the real signal underneath the headlines. Not just that talks failed. But that both sides are now preparing for what happens if they continue to fail.
0:24

🚨 OPERATIONAL UPDATE: TALKS FAIL, PRESSURE CONTINUES - Reporting Window: Last 24 Hours The diplomatic track did not produce a result in this window. After extended, high-level negotiations in Islamabad, the United States and Iran left without an agreement, despite what both sides described as a final round of talks. At the same time, Lebanon remains active, the Strait of Hormuz is still unresolved, and the broader regional pressure structure has not changed. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🇵🇰 ISLAMABAD TALKS: FAILED ROUND, NOT A BREAKTHROUGH The most important development in this window is straightforward: • U.S. and Iranian delegations held 21 hours of direct talks • No agreement was reached • Both sides left without accepting terms • Each side blamed the other The core issues did not move: • U.S. demands: nuclear rollback and unrestricted access to the Strait of Hormuz • Iranian demands: sanctions relief, reparations, control over Hormuz, and a regional ceasefire including Lebanon Those positions remain fundamentally incompatible. At its core, this is not just a ceasefire negotiation. It is a negotiation over Iran’s long-term ability to project power: • The U.S. is pushing to dismantle that capability, including nuclear, missile, and proxy elements • Iran is trying to preserve enough of it to remain a regional power Both sides are still signaling willingness to continue talks, but this round produced no progress. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🇱🇧 LEBANON: CONTINUED STRIKES, NO LINK TO CEASEFIRE Lebanon remains the most active battlefield and was not affected by the failed negotiations. Israeli strikes continued across southern Lebanon, with reporting confirming: • Multiple strike waves across southern towns • At least 11 killed in recent operations • Continued targeting of Hezbollah infrastructure and positions At the same time, Hezbollah continues: • Intermittent rocket fire toward Israel • Ongoing clashes along the border This reinforces the established fact that there is no operational pause in Lebanon. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚓ STRAIT OF HORMUZ: NAVAL MOVEMENTS AND PARTIAL OPENING The most important operational shift in this window is in the Strait itself. Two U.S. Navy destroyers transited the Strait of Hormuz, tied to planned mine-clearing operations. Three supertankers successfully exited the Gulf, while hundreds remain queued, and Iran continues to signal control and leverage over access. At the same time, the U.S. has now moved beyond signaling: • President Trump announced the Navy will interdict vessels that pay tolls to Iran • He indicated a willingness to impose a de facto blockade of the Strait • The stated objective is to eliminate Iran’s ability to monetize or control passage This creates a new reality: • Hormuz is not fully closed • It is not fully open • It is now becoming an actively contested maritime zone ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌍 GLOBAL ENERGY RESPONSE Markets are already adapting to the disruption. • Tankers are rerouting away from the Gulf • U.S. exports are rising toward record levels • Gulf Coast refineries are running near capacity • Major buyers are competing for non-Gulf supply The effect is clear. Iran disrupted supply, the global market began rerouting around it, that does not remove Iran’s leverage. It limits how long that leverage can be sustained. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📌 WHAT MATTERS MOST RIGHT NOW • U.S.–Iran talks failed to produce an agreement • Both sides left Islamabad without accepting terms, though talks may continue • Lebanon remains an active battlefield, with continued Israeli strikes and Hezbollah fire • The U.S. has begun direct naval movement through Hormuz, including destroyer transits and upcoming mine-clearing operations • Shipping is partially resuming, but the Strait remains unstable and contested ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧠 ASSESSMENT This was a real negotiation attempt. It failed. And the reason it failed is becoming clearer. Iran continues to negotiate as if it holds structural leverage over the outcome. The battlefield suggests otherwise. Its position is weaker than its posture. But it is not without leverage. That leverage is concentrated in two places: • The ability to disrupt Hormuz and global energy flow • The ability to keep secondary fronts, especially Lebanon, active The first creates economic pressure. The second prevents clean diplomatic separation. At the same time, the United States is signaling something equally important: It is willing to test those limits directly. Naval transits through Hormuz are not symbolic. They are the early stages of forcing open the most important pressure point Iran still holds. That is the real signal underneath the headlines. Not just that talks failed. But that both sides are now preparing for what happens if they continue to fail.

Inside_Israel_Intel

22,034 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Lewis Goodall, "I can see what a Brexiter might make the argument that we've got preferential treatment" "We've lost an enormous amount of trade as a result of the dislocation with the EU" "The principle argument during Brexit was that we would get a US-UK trade deal. Where is it?" "We're in a net position where we've lost trade with the EU, we have a more distant economic relationship with the EU, and we've got 10% tariffs" Ben Chu, "It's also worth asking what a US-UK trade deal is worth. Donald Trump had a trade deal with Canada and Mexico which he signed himself and said was the greatest deal ever" "He's come back to power and he's ripping it up" Victoria Derbyshire, "If there's a global trade war that head room Rachel Reeves was talking about is gone" Ben Chu, "£10 billion head room and the OBR made it very clear, that if we do get hit with tariffs, then that's gone" Lewis Goodall, "We haven't seen the imposition of trade barriers so quickly since Brexit, on a global scale, we don't know how this is going to feed through. It could be really severe"
1:56

Lewis Goodall, "I can see what a Brexiter might make the argument that we've got preferential treatment" "We've lost an enormous amount of trade as a result of the dislocation with the EU" "The principle argument during Brexit was that we would get a US-UK trade deal. Where is it?" "We're in a net position where we've lost trade with the EU, we have a more distant economic relationship with the EU, and we've got 10% tariffs" Ben Chu, "It's also worth asking what a US-UK trade deal is worth. Donald Trump had a trade deal with Canada and Mexico which he signed himself and said was the greatest deal ever" "He's come back to power and he's ripping it up" Victoria Derbyshire, "If there's a global trade war that head room Rachel Reeves was talking about is gone" Ben Chu, "£10 billion head room and the OBR made it very clear, that if we do get hit with tariffs, then that's gone" Lewis Goodall, "We haven't seen the imposition of trade barriers so quickly since Brexit, on a global scale, we don't know how this is going to feed through. It could be really severe"

Farrukh

133,228 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Being clear is kind. I was in the operating room the other day, during a stressful part of a case I needed a moment of complete focus, so I asked everyone in the room to be quiet. A few minutes later, after we had moved through that part of the operation, I apologized to the anesthesiologist. He looked at me and said, "Being unclear is unkind. Being clear is kind." No one has ever said that to me before. I've always believed that honesty and direct communication are acts of respect, especially at work and in healthcare. Patients deserve clarity. Teams deserve clarity. In the operating room, where every decision matters, clarity creates trust and keeps patients safe. I know I can be intense. My intensity has always been about caring deeply. It's about protecting my patients. It's about making sure everyone in the room knows exactly what I need so we can do our best work together. What meant so much to me about his comment wasn't just the words themselves. It was that he understood what was behind them. He didn't see intensity. He saw kindness. I couldn't ask for more than to work with people who understand that, and to be that kind of surgeon for my patients.
1:08

Being clear is kind. I was in the operating room the other day, during a stressful part of a case I needed a moment of complete focus, so I asked everyone in the room to be quiet. A few minutes later, after we had moved through that part of the operation, I apologized to the anesthesiologist. He looked at me and said, "Being unclear is unkind. Being clear is kind." No one has ever said that to me before. I've always believed that honesty and direct communication are acts of respect, especially at work and in healthcare. Patients deserve clarity. Teams deserve clarity. In the operating room, where every decision matters, clarity creates trust and keeps patients safe. I know I can be intense. My intensity has always been about caring deeply. It's about protecting my patients. It's about making sure everyone in the room knows exactly what I need so we can do our best work together. What meant so much to me about his comment wasn't just the words themselves. It was that he understood what was behind them. He didn't see intensity. He saw kindness. I couldn't ask for more than to work with people who understand that, and to be that kind of surgeon for my patients.

Elisabeth Potter MD

11,105 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Pete Carroll says winning championships was never actually the point “It isn’t about winning the championship. It’s not about that. As soon as you win it, it’s over with. It’s in your back pocket. You’ve already done that.” “That’s not the motivator. The motivator is to be the best you can possibly be. That’s ongoing. It never ends. I’m not a big goals guy.” “Goals, you achieve them. To me, I want ongoing, never-ending aspirations of being great at what you’re doing. There is no one game that is the only game. There is no one accomplishment that’s the only accomplishment.” “Can you come back again? Is that really who you are? Is that worth fighting for?” “Can you be true to yourself? Can you really be yourself under all circumstances? No matter what happens, when you get your ass whipped in the freaking Super Bowl, when you had two in a row and you’re two seconds from doing it again, can you come back after that moment and still be who you are?” “That was what the challenge was to me. As hard as that looked, as hard as it felt, and as hard as it was on all the people around me, I took it like this: ‘Okay, you knew this was going to happen sometime.’ ‘Are you going to be the real deal or not?’”
2:21

Pete Carroll says winning championships was never actually the point “It isn’t about winning the championship. It’s not about that. As soon as you win it, it’s over with. It’s in your back pocket. You’ve already done that.” “That’s not the motivator. The motivator is to be the best you can possibly be. That’s ongoing. It never ends. I’m not a big goals guy.” “Goals, you achieve them. To me, I want ongoing, never-ending aspirations of being great at what you’re doing. There is no one game that is the only game. There is no one accomplishment that’s the only accomplishment.” “Can you come back again? Is that really who you are? Is that worth fighting for?” “Can you be true to yourself? Can you really be yourself under all circumstances? No matter what happens, when you get your ass whipped in the freaking Super Bowl, when you had two in a row and you’re two seconds from doing it again, can you come back after that moment and still be who you are?” “That was what the challenge was to me. As hard as that looked, as hard as it felt, and as hard as it was on all the people around me, I took it like this: ‘Okay, you knew this was going to happen sometime.’ ‘Are you going to be the real deal or not?’”

Josh Chambers

414,083 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen