Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

No gag reflex + that thick trans ass = problem 😵‍💫 Bent over the chair taking every stroke while her booty claps 😩💦 Body too soft #BubbleBooty #Trans #BBC #Backshots #SloppyBlowjob #GoonFuel

GOONERParad1s3's profile picture

GOONER Paradise 🔞

70,283 subscribers

78,855 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#BubbleBooty#Trans#BBC#Backshots#SloppyBlowjob#GoonFuel
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"Take that mother f*ckin' graph and shove it up your ass. Keep trans people out of your mother f*ckin' mouth and watch a real mother love them the way they deserve to be loved." I had no idea who this freak was, but apparently she is a DJ. The video illustrates the deranged gender hypnosis that has mutated these narcissists into authoritarian advocates for child abuse beyond return. Some highlights: - She has allegedly 'smuggled' in hormones to other countries for trans kids that have attended Roisin Murphy's events. - She sees no problem with any strange adult taking up the role of 'mother' for trans kids when their parents don't affirm their delusion; it is a badge of honour. - "Nazis" are hunting down trans kids in her home town. It seems "The Blessed Madonna" is not blessed - she's demonic. #IStandWithRoisinMurphy
6:57

"Take that mother f*ckin' graph and shove it up your ass. Keep trans people out of your mother f*ckin' mouth and watch a real mother love them the way they deserve to be loved." I had no idea who this freak was, but apparently she is a DJ. The video illustrates the deranged gender hypnosis that has mutated these narcissists into authoritarian advocates for child abuse beyond return. Some highlights: - She has allegedly 'smuggled' in hormones to other countries for trans kids that have attended Roisin Murphy's events. - She sees no problem with any strange adult taking up the role of 'mother' for trans kids when their parents don't affirm their delusion; it is a badge of honour. - "Nazis" are hunting down trans kids in her home town. It seems "The Blessed Madonna" is not blessed - she's demonic. #IStandWithRoisinMurphy

Jack Jewell

36,634 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Utterly vile. Emily emily m bragging about helping destroy UK trans healthcare by spreading propaganda through her platform on BBC Newsnight . 30 dead since puberty blockers became unavailable to young trans - though PBs are still prescribed to c!s patients. Is that “data led” enough? Condemning trans youth to go through puberties they explicitly do not want - making them change in ways which make them a target. All in the hope they become c!s. Conversion therapy. And when they don’t become c!s, and are stuck in too tall, too broad bodies, Emily and co say: “Well, at least no harm done.” No expertise in this area. Ideologically driven. PBs are widely available in every country bar culture-wars UK and US. The News Agents
0:36

Utterly vile. Emily emily m bragging about helping destroy UK trans healthcare by spreading propaganda through her platform on BBC Newsnight . 30 dead since puberty blockers became unavailable to young trans - though PBs are still prescribed to c!s patients. Is that “data led” enough? Condemning trans youth to go through puberties they explicitly do not want - making them change in ways which make them a target. All in the hope they become c!s. Conversion therapy. And when they don’t become c!s, and are stuck in too tall, too broad bodies, Emily and co say: “Well, at least no harm done.” No expertise in this area. Ideologically driven. PBs are widely available in every country bar culture-wars UK and US. The News Agents

India Willoughby

23,808 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

If my daughter were in this Guide group, I would remove her immediately. Because youth organisations shouldn’t be using children to front political campaigns. This video from Thatcham Rangers, part of Girlguiding, shows girls holding slogans such as “trans girls are girls” and “our story includes trans girls”, while the Guide Promise is read over the top. The video also includes repeated shots of what appear to be shark and dolphin plush toys - which call to mind the Blåhaj shark plush toy from IKEA, a soft toy that has become a well-known symbol in online trans activism. The video is presented as part of a badge exercise on protest and activism. But when it involves coordinated slogans, covered faces and links to activist organisations, it’s reasonable to ask whether this is really a youth activity - or political campaigning. The caption includes a disclaimer that the views expressed don’t necessarily represent those of Girlguiding or the church involved. But it also thanks activist organisations including Guiders Against Trans Exclusion (GATE) and Newbury Pride. At the end of last year, Girlguiding announced that boys who identify as girls would no longer be able to join Guiding - a policy change that prompted significant public debate. To be clear, this isn’t criticism of the girls themselves. The responsibility lies with the adults who organised and encouraged them to take part in a highly contested political campaign.
0:49

If my daughter were in this Guide group, I would remove her immediately. Because youth organisations shouldn’t be using children to front political campaigns. This video from Thatcham Rangers, part of Girlguiding, shows girls holding slogans such as “trans girls are girls” and “our story includes trans girls”, while the Guide Promise is read over the top. The video also includes repeated shots of what appear to be shark and dolphin plush toys - which call to mind the Blåhaj shark plush toy from IKEA, a soft toy that has become a well-known symbol in online trans activism. The video is presented as part of a badge exercise on protest and activism. But when it involves coordinated slogans, covered faces and links to activist organisations, it’s reasonable to ask whether this is really a youth activity - or political campaigning. The caption includes a disclaimer that the views expressed don’t necessarily represent those of Girlguiding or the church involved. But it also thanks activist organisations including Guiders Against Trans Exclusion (GATE) and Newbury Pride. At the end of last year, Girlguiding announced that boys who identify as girls would no longer be able to join Guiding - a policy change that prompted significant public debate. To be clear, this isn’t criticism of the girls themselves. The responsibility lies with the adults who organised and encouraged them to take part in a highly contested political campaign.

Janet Murray

47,105 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Megyn Kelly ERUPTS as a Washington prosecutor suggests the teenage girl s*xually assaulted by a trans wrestler may have only felt “the sensation” of being penetrated. “This is BULLSH*T!” Megyn plays the video and reads the prosecutor’s memo out loud, and it gets worse with every sentence: MEMO: "As someone who has no history with wrestling, I was unaware that touching in the area of genitals and buttocks is somewhat common, including the sensation that an opponent may be penetrating genitals." KELLY: "The sensation that one is penetrating genitals? I'm sorry, but women know if their genitals are getting penetrated or not. What the f*ck is this?" MEMO: "This practice or sensation is common enough to have a nickname in the wrestling community… 'oil checking' in wrestling circles." MEMO: "The referee who presided over the match appears to have said that while nothing stood out to him during the match, after watching the video of the match, he could not say that the suspect's hand placement was, quote, 'anything out of the ordinary'… sometimes in the course of a match… you grab what you can grab. 'That's something that happens in almost every match.'" KELLY: "You get fingers up your vag*na in almost every match? F*cking bullsh*t. This is bullsh*t. I smell fucking woke administrators who are trying to cover for a trans athlete." ADDED CONTEXT: The victim, a 15-year-old girl, alleges her trans opponent pressed fingers into her vag*na during a December 2025 girls wrestling match in Puyallup, Washington. The sheriff's office referred the case to prosecutors as third-degree r@pe. Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney Mary Robnett refused to charge the trans athlete, admitting there was "no doubt" the girl didn't want the penetration to occur but citing a consent defense for contact in organized sports. The principal and athletic coordinator of the victim's school have been criminally charged for waiting 53 days to report the incident.
1:32

Megyn Kelly ERUPTS as a Washington prosecutor suggests the teenage girl s*xually assaulted by a trans wrestler may have only felt “the sensation” of being penetrated. “This is BULLSH*T!” Megyn plays the video and reads the prosecutor’s memo out loud, and it gets worse with every sentence: MEMO: "As someone who has no history with wrestling, I was unaware that touching in the area of genitals and buttocks is somewhat common, including the sensation that an opponent may be penetrating genitals." KELLY: "The sensation that one is penetrating genitals? I'm sorry, but women know if their genitals are getting penetrated or not. What the f*ck is this?" MEMO: "This practice or sensation is common enough to have a nickname in the wrestling community… 'oil checking' in wrestling circles." MEMO: "The referee who presided over the match appears to have said that while nothing stood out to him during the match, after watching the video of the match, he could not say that the suspect's hand placement was, quote, 'anything out of the ordinary'… sometimes in the course of a match… you grab what you can grab. 'That's something that happens in almost every match.'" KELLY: "You get fingers up your vag*na in almost every match? F*cking bullsh*t. This is bullsh*t. I smell fucking woke administrators who are trying to cover for a trans athlete." ADDED CONTEXT: The victim, a 15-year-old girl, alleges her trans opponent pressed fingers into her vag*na during a December 2025 girls wrestling match in Puyallup, Washington. The sheriff's office referred the case to prosecutors as third-degree r@pe. Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney Mary Robnett refused to charge the trans athlete, admitting there was "no doubt" the girl didn't want the penetration to occur but citing a consent defense for contact in organized sports. The principal and athletic coordinator of the victim's school have been criminally charged for waiting 53 days to report the incident.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

164,310 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

This is WILD! MIT just solved one of the hardest unsolved problems in robotics (Save this). For decades, the fundamental problem with soft robots and wearable exoskeletons has not been compute or AI, it has been actuation. The moment you try to give a soft robot meaningful strength, you run into the same wall every engineer has hit since the field began, fluid-driven systems require external pumps, hydraulic reservoirs, and heavy infrastructure that makes the entire thing impractical to wear or embed into fabric. MIT's new Electrofluidic Fiber Muscles solve that problem by eliminating external infrastructure entirely. The key insight is electrohydrodynamic pumping using electric fields to generate pressure directly from electricity, with no moving parts, no motors, and no external fluid reservoir. The fibers are less than 2 millimeters thick, can be woven into fabric like ordinary textile, and operate in complete silence because nothing physically moves inside them, it is just ions propelling fluid through a closed circuit. The performance numbers published in Science Robotics are not conceptual, they are empirical results from actual hardware. These fibers achieve a power density of 50 watts per kilogram, matching skeletal muscle, with a contraction strain of 20% and a response time of 0.3 seconds. A single bundled configuration lifted 4 kilograms, 200 times its own weight while a separate configuration drove a robotic arm through a 40-degree bend compliant enough to safely complete a human handshake. Another configuration launched objects in under 100 milliseconds, which is faster than a human flinch reflex. The design mirrors biological muscle architecture in a way that prior artificial muscle approaches never achieved. The fibers are organized into antagonistic pairs, one contracts while the other extends, exactly like biceps and triceps and because the system runs in a closed loop, the relaxing fiber serves as the fluid reservoir for the contracting one, which is what allows the whole system to operate untethered with no external tank. The applications are not hypothetical but rather are the exact use cases the industry has been waiting years for the hardware to catch up to. Exoskeletons for physical labor, prosthetic limbs that move with the natural compliance of biological tissue, assistive garments for patients with motor disorders, and soft robots capable of safe physical contact with humans are all immediately unlocked by a muscle technology that is silent, lightweight, and weavable into clothing. The deeper significance is what this technology does when it meets the AI robotics wave that is already underway. Every major humanoid robot program, Figure, 1X, Boston Dynamics, Tesla Optimus is currently bottlenecked by the same hardware limitations these fibers address, actuators that are too rigid, too loud, too heavy, or too dependent on infrastructure to operate naturally alongside humans. Electrofluidic fiber muscles do not just solve a materials science problem but rather they remove one of the last physical barriers between robots that live in labs and robots that live in the world.
0:28

This is WILD! MIT just solved one of the hardest unsolved problems in robotics (Save this). For decades, the fundamental problem with soft robots and wearable exoskeletons has not been compute or AI, it has been actuation. The moment you try to give a soft robot meaningful strength, you run into the same wall every engineer has hit since the field began, fluid-driven systems require external pumps, hydraulic reservoirs, and heavy infrastructure that makes the entire thing impractical to wear or embed into fabric. MIT's new Electrofluidic Fiber Muscles solve that problem by eliminating external infrastructure entirely. The key insight is electrohydrodynamic pumping using electric fields to generate pressure directly from electricity, with no moving parts, no motors, and no external fluid reservoir. The fibers are less than 2 millimeters thick, can be woven into fabric like ordinary textile, and operate in complete silence because nothing physically moves inside them, it is just ions propelling fluid through a closed circuit. The performance numbers published in Science Robotics are not conceptual, they are empirical results from actual hardware. These fibers achieve a power density of 50 watts per kilogram, matching skeletal muscle, with a contraction strain of 20% and a response time of 0.3 seconds. A single bundled configuration lifted 4 kilograms, 200 times its own weight while a separate configuration drove a robotic arm through a 40-degree bend compliant enough to safely complete a human handshake. Another configuration launched objects in under 100 milliseconds, which is faster than a human flinch reflex. The design mirrors biological muscle architecture in a way that prior artificial muscle approaches never achieved. The fibers are organized into antagonistic pairs, one contracts while the other extends, exactly like biceps and triceps and because the system runs in a closed loop, the relaxing fiber serves as the fluid reservoir for the contracting one, which is what allows the whole system to operate untethered with no external tank. The applications are not hypothetical but rather are the exact use cases the industry has been waiting years for the hardware to catch up to. Exoskeletons for physical labor, prosthetic limbs that move with the natural compliance of biological tissue, assistive garments for patients with motor disorders, and soft robots capable of safe physical contact with humans are all immediately unlocked by a muscle technology that is silent, lightweight, and weavable into clothing. The deeper significance is what this technology does when it meets the AI robotics wave that is already underway. Every major humanoid robot program, Figure, 1X, Boston Dynamics, Tesla Optimus is currently bottlenecked by the same hardware limitations these fibers address, actuators that are too rigid, too loud, too heavy, or too dependent on infrastructure to operate naturally alongside humans. Electrofluidic fiber muscles do not just solve a materials science problem but rather they remove one of the last physical barriers between robots that live in labs and robots that live in the world.

Milk Road AI

1,205,969 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The BBC ran schools gender guidance as second story, with the Education Editor, Branwen Jeffreys, on national bulletin at Six. Quite something. Ending the Identity Hub’s gatekeeping of this issue was a very good move. It’s very assured but it needed a balancing quote from a concerned safeguarding group. The residual issue, which is actually a huge problem across the board, and not particular to the BBC, is that the guidance, like the Cass Review, and Pathways puberty blocker research, and almost all media coverage, is predicated on the existence of ‘true trans’. That is, the belief that some children really are born in the wrong body, or have an opposite sex brain. If you believe this [necessarily untrue] claim, then naturally you will assume a small number of children do need to be socially and medically transitioned, it’s just that we need to be careful about which ones. And that creates loopholes, which researchers who’ve followed it for years know will be exploited. For example - the ‘vast majority’ of children can’t transition at school without parents knowing - so that means some schools can help a child secretly transition. Boys can/should be banned from girls sport ‘when it’s safer’ - so some boys can be in a girls category. It’s as if the problem for the last 15 years is that too many children were wrongly thought to be in the wrong body, instead of a global failure to understand that no one is, at all. It looks like this has been settled on as a compromise position for now, for the sake of neutrality. But if we have to set that aside, this was assured and fair content.
2:24

The BBC ran schools gender guidance as second story, with the Education Editor, Branwen Jeffreys, on national bulletin at Six. Quite something. Ending the Identity Hub’s gatekeeping of this issue was a very good move. It’s very assured but it needed a balancing quote from a concerned safeguarding group. The residual issue, which is actually a huge problem across the board, and not particular to the BBC, is that the guidance, like the Cass Review, and Pathways puberty blocker research, and almost all media coverage, is predicated on the existence of ‘true trans’. That is, the belief that some children really are born in the wrong body, or have an opposite sex brain. If you believe this [necessarily untrue] claim, then naturally you will assume a small number of children do need to be socially and medically transitioned, it’s just that we need to be careful about which ones. And that creates loopholes, which researchers who’ve followed it for years know will be exploited. For example - the ‘vast majority’ of children can’t transition at school without parents knowing - so that means some schools can help a child secretly transition. Boys can/should be banned from girls sport ‘when it’s safer’ - so some boys can be in a girls category. It’s as if the problem for the last 15 years is that too many children were wrongly thought to be in the wrong body, instead of a global failure to understand that no one is, at all. It looks like this has been settled on as a compromise position for now, for the sake of neutrality. But if we have to set that aside, this was assured and fair content.

SEEN in Journalism

19,262 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

In 1964, on a BBC broadcast, Arthur C. Clarke said something that most people probably couldn‘t comprehend at the time. He talked about the end of biological evolution. Not someday far off. He pointed to the beginning of the 21st century. Calmly. As if it were obvious. He said machines would begin to think, learn, and improve themselves faster than we ever could. That intelligence would no longer be bound to the human body. That evolution would move on…without us at the center. What strikes me is how human he sounded while saying something so inhuman. No fear. No hesitation. Just quiet certainty. And here we are. Machine is taking over. Making decisions. Learning at speeds most humans can‘t comprehend. Serious conversations about merging with machines just to keep up. This didn’t sneak up on us. You don’t speak this clearly on television unless the path is already set. Clarke was letting us know where things were headed. And now, standing inside the future he described, we finally have to ask the question he never did: Do we actually want this? And if the answer is NO - is it too late? ✨🙌🏾💫
1:34

In 1964, on a BBC broadcast, Arthur C. Clarke said something that most people probably couldn‘t comprehend at the time. He talked about the end of biological evolution. Not someday far off. He pointed to the beginning of the 21st century. Calmly. As if it were obvious. He said machines would begin to think, learn, and improve themselves faster than we ever could. That intelligence would no longer be bound to the human body. That evolution would move on…without us at the center. What strikes me is how human he sounded while saying something so inhuman. No fear. No hesitation. Just quiet certainty. And here we are. Machine is taking over. Making decisions. Learning at speeds most humans can‘t comprehend. Serious conversations about merging with machines just to keep up. This didn’t sneak up on us. You don’t speak this clearly on television unless the path is already set. Clarke was letting us know where things were headed. And now, standing inside the future he described, we finally have to ask the question he never did: Do we actually want this? And if the answer is NO - is it too late? ✨🙌🏾💫

🧬Maxpein🧬

131,715 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

"Tristan identifies as a trans woman. Her preferred pronouns are she/her." These are the words of BBC Radio Ulster presenter Chris Buckler during today's interview with Fiona McAnena from Sex Matters. About a male guest. They were discussing his recent interview with Tristan Morrow - a young man who left the Orange Order and now identifies as a trans woman. SEEN in Journalism criticised that interview for: - Inaccuracy: using female pronouns for a man - Failing to challenge contested ideological claims - Not mentioning women once - despite covering disputes over women's sex-based spaces We've now had the chance to listen back to today's interview with Fiona (McAnena). While it was encouraging to hear a gender-critical woman given similar airtime, the two interviews could hardly have been more different. Morrow was largely allowed to tell his personal story uninterrupted and with relatively little challenge. McAnena faced repeated interruptions and hostile questioning, much of it relating to the recent controversy over the cancellation of a Women's Rights Network event at the Belfast arts festival Féile an Phobail. Among the questions Buckler put to her - some more than once - were: - Do you accept that people born male should be allowed to live as women? - Do you object to referring to Tristan Morrow as "she"? - How does using female pronouns for trans women impact your rights? - Do you believe trans people have a right to exist? - Do you accept there are adults who feel they are in the wrong body? - Would you welcome a trans person to your event ? McAnena did an admirable job of steering the conversation back to women's rights. Buckler repeatedly returned it to transgender identity. Buckler also made several references to SEEN in Journalism's criticism of his interview with Morrow, but appeared to misunderstand the substance of our argument. We did not say he should have included a female voice to "push back" on Morrow. We said he never mentioned women or women's rights once during a 21-minute interview about a dispute rooted in women's sex-based spaces. That is a different point entirely. We also raised concerns about inaccurate language - using female pronouns to describe a male guest. Rather than engaging with those concerns, Buckler appeared to double down - at one point, appearing to rebuke McAnena for referring to Morrow as "he". But our criticism wasn't about politeness. It was about accuracy. A principle the BBC should hold in the highest regard. At one point, Buckler said he wasn't speaking from either side. Yet across these two interviews, listeners learnt far more about identifying as trans than they did about why women defend sex-based rights. Good journalism should help audiences understand competing perspectives, not steer them towards one.
21:00

"Tristan identifies as a trans woman. Her preferred pronouns are she/her." These are the words of BBC Radio Ulster presenter Chris Buckler during today's interview with Fiona McAnena from Sex Matters. About a male guest. They were discussing his recent interview with Tristan Morrow - a young man who left the Orange Order and now identifies as a trans woman. SEEN in Journalism criticised that interview for: - Inaccuracy: using female pronouns for a man - Failing to challenge contested ideological claims - Not mentioning women once - despite covering disputes over women's sex-based spaces We've now had the chance to listen back to today's interview with Fiona (McAnena). While it was encouraging to hear a gender-critical woman given similar airtime, the two interviews could hardly have been more different. Morrow was largely allowed to tell his personal story uninterrupted and with relatively little challenge. McAnena faced repeated interruptions and hostile questioning, much of it relating to the recent controversy over the cancellation of a Women's Rights Network event at the Belfast arts festival Féile an Phobail. Among the questions Buckler put to her - some more than once - were: - Do you accept that people born male should be allowed to live as women? - Do you object to referring to Tristan Morrow as "she"? - How does using female pronouns for trans women impact your rights? - Do you believe trans people have a right to exist? - Do you accept there are adults who feel they are in the wrong body? - Would you welcome a trans person to your event ? McAnena did an admirable job of steering the conversation back to women's rights. Buckler repeatedly returned it to transgender identity. Buckler also made several references to SEEN in Journalism's criticism of his interview with Morrow, but appeared to misunderstand the substance of our argument. We did not say he should have included a female voice to "push back" on Morrow. We said he never mentioned women or women's rights once during a 21-minute interview about a dispute rooted in women's sex-based spaces. That is a different point entirely. We also raised concerns about inaccurate language - using female pronouns to describe a male guest. Rather than engaging with those concerns, Buckler appeared to double down - at one point, appearing to rebuke McAnena for referring to Morrow as "he". But our criticism wasn't about politeness. It was about accuracy. A principle the BBC should hold in the highest regard. At one point, Buckler said he wasn't speaking from either side. Yet across these two interviews, listeners learnt far more about identifying as trans than they did about why women defend sex-based rights. Good journalism should help audiences understand competing perspectives, not steer them towards one.

SEEN in Journalism

79,364 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

POST OFFICE LAWYER WHO REFUSED TO TESTIFY NOW FACES HER OWN TRIBUNAL Jane MacLeod ran the Post Office legal department from 2015 to 2019. That is the exact window when the organisation was busy defending itself against the subpostmasters it had already destroyed. In 2024 the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry asked her to come and explain herself. She said no. She offered a written statement instead and argued too much time had passed for her memory to matter. Inquiry chair Sir Wyn Williams offered to pay her flights and hotel from Australia where she now lives. She still refused, in person or by video link. He admitted publicly that forcing her back would need a criminal conviction and possibly extradition. That process would outlast most subpostmasters patience for justice. So she walked. Now the Solicitors Regulation Authority SRA has referred her to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. The allegation covers April to July 2024, when she failed to cooperate fully with the Inquiry. She is also named as a significant individual in the Metropolitan Police investigation Operation Olympos. When BBC cameras doorstepped her about documents suggesting the Post Office lied about knowing Horizon was faulty, her answer was no comment. A strong move from someone who used to run a legal team built on telling the public the opposite. Over 900 subpostmasters were wrongly prosecuted between 1999 and 2009 because of broken Fujitsu software. Lives and marriages were wrecked while people in her position drafted the legal advice that kept the lie standing. A second solicitor, Nick Gould, has also been referred, over how he charged exonerated subpostmistresses for help after their convictions were quashed. dodging a public inquiry from the other side of the planet while your victims are still waiting for compensation says plenty on its own. Sources: ComputerWeekly Law Society Gazette Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry SRA Nick Wallis
0:33

POST OFFICE LAWYER WHO REFUSED TO TESTIFY NOW FACES HER OWN TRIBUNAL Jane MacLeod ran the Post Office legal department from 2015 to 2019. That is the exact window when the organisation was busy defending itself against the subpostmasters it had already destroyed. In 2024 the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry asked her to come and explain herself. She said no. She offered a written statement instead and argued too much time had passed for her memory to matter. Inquiry chair Sir Wyn Williams offered to pay her flights and hotel from Australia where she now lives. She still refused, in person or by video link. He admitted publicly that forcing her back would need a criminal conviction and possibly extradition. That process would outlast most subpostmasters patience for justice. So she walked. Now the Solicitors Regulation Authority SRA has referred her to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. The allegation covers April to July 2024, when she failed to cooperate fully with the Inquiry. She is also named as a significant individual in the Metropolitan Police investigation Operation Olympos. When BBC cameras doorstepped her about documents suggesting the Post Office lied about knowing Horizon was faulty, her answer was no comment. A strong move from someone who used to run a legal team built on telling the public the opposite. Over 900 subpostmasters were wrongly prosecuted between 1999 and 2009 because of broken Fujitsu software. Lives and marriages were wrecked while people in her position drafted the legal advice that kept the lie standing. A second solicitor, Nick Gould, has also been referred, over how he charged exonerated subpostmistresses for help after their convictions were quashed. dodging a public inquiry from the other side of the planet while your victims are still waiting for compensation says plenty on its own. Sources: ComputerWeekly Law Society Gazette Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry SRA Nick Wallis

Artur Nadolny

66,184 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"I hate to say it, but this person, Tish, isn't the most traditionally feminine person." Amazing! Samantha Lux - a man who identifies as a "woman" - has the nerve to criticize another biological woman's femininity and even claim people might mistake her for trans. Let that sink in: a man who's had countless surgeries and treatments, taking cross-sex hormones, dares to judge a real woman's femininity - a woman who simply complained about men entering the women's changing room at her gym. Then Samantha goes on to declare she's "clearly deeply unwell" and that "nobody's responsible for cuddling your trauma." So a man who believes he was "born in the wrong body" and surgically removed his penis gets to label a biological woman "deeply unwell" for not wanting men in her changing room. To sum it up, Samantha: You're not a woman. Your place is not in women's spaces. You're in no position to criticize real women who don't want men - no matter how they "identify" - in their locker rooms, bathrooms, or any other protected space. This isn't "progress." It's a man telling women how they should look, feel, and behave - while insisting he has the right to enter women's spaces without giving a damn about them.
0:59

Sensitive content

"I hate to say it, but this person, Tish, isn't the most traditionally feminine person." Amazing! Samantha Lux - a man who identifies as a "woman" - has the nerve to criticize another biological woman's femininity and even claim people might mistake her for trans. Let that sink in: a man who's had countless surgeries and treatments, taking cross-sex hormones, dares to judge a real woman's femininity - a woman who simply complained about men entering the women's changing room at her gym. Then Samantha goes on to declare she's "clearly deeply unwell" and that "nobody's responsible for cuddling your trauma." So a man who believes he was "born in the wrong body" and surgically removed his penis gets to label a biological woman "deeply unwell" for not wanting men in her changing room. To sum it up, Samantha: You're not a woman. Your place is not in women's spaces. You're in no position to criticize real women who don't want men - no matter how they "identify" - in their locker rooms, bathrooms, or any other protected space. This isn't "progress." It's a man telling women how they should look, feel, and behave - while insisting he has the right to enter women's spaces without giving a damn about them.

נושא הדגל

202,894 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Pain demands to be felt We brought Banban home around 2017. Papa was planning to pass her to one of his bowling buddies, but we begged, and somehow he smiled and said yes. She came with Lassy and Fudgie at first—those three tumbling through the house like they owned it. One by one, old age quietly took the others, leaving Banban as the last gentle giant of that little pack. She was always indoors, but every chance we got, we’d walk her slowly outside, her tail still sweeping the air like she was young again. I used to be only a cat person—those scrappy puspins were my world. But Banban? She never once snapped or pushed them away. She’d let them curl into her warmth, even nap beside her massive paws. I can still see her lying there, patient, eyes half-closed, as if saying, “It’s okay, little ones. You’re safe here.” That quiet kindness was her language. She carried us through everything. Papa’s death in 2019 left a hole nothing could fill—except Banban, still there at the gate, still wagging like he might walk through the door any second. The pandemic locked us in; Typhoon Ulysses tore the world apart outside; she stayed steady. Through tears, fear, silence, she was the one constant heartbeat we could touch. Every time I left the house, I came back with pasalubong just for her—warm pandesal, bits of chicken, her favorite treats. The second the gate creaked, there she was: ears up, eyes bright, that full-body wiggle of pure joy. No matter how heavy the day had been, her welcome cracked me open with light. Then Britney and Cabs arrived—tiny tornadoes of chaos. They’d nip at her ears, climb over her like she was furniture. Banban never growled. She’d just sigh that big, dramatic sigh, shift her weight, and let them win. Big sister to the end. January 2026 stole her hind legs without warning. We carried her, supported her, walked her anyway—whispering, “Come on, girl, just a little more.” I prayed until my throat hurt, bargained with God, promised anything if she’d just stand again. We bought every medicine, tried every trick. But this week her light started fading fast. Last Wednesday, I looked into those tired brown eyes and knew: we were down to hours. I sat on the floor beside her, forehead to forehead. I whispered sorry—for not walking her one more time around the block, for not sneaking her one extra treat (even though she was already the most spoiled girl in the world). I thanked her for every single day she chose us, for guarding our broken hearts, for being the thread that still tied me to Papa. I told her she didn’t have to fight anymore. “It’s okay to rest now, Banban. You’ve been so brave. I love you. Go find Papa—he’s waiting.” The room went still. Birds sang outside like they knew. Time stretched thin. Five minutes later, she sighed one last soft breath and slipped away—peaceful, no pain, just… gone. The tears haven’t stopped. She was my last living piece of him. Papa brought her home; now they’re together again, I have to believe that. I begged her to come back to us somehow, in some new fur and wagging tail. Coming home now is the hardest part. The gate is empty. No happy bark, no smiling face pressed to the bars, no warm body leaning into my legs. The silence screams. But I thank God—for the gift of her, for the gentle way He carried her home. I’ll keep praying she finds her way back. We love you beyond words, Banban. Run free, our sweetest Ate. Chase endless zoomies, roll in fields of treats, rest your head on Papa’s lap. Watch over us, okay? Until we meet again. I miss you with every breath. But heaven denied Destiny decried Something beautiful died Too soon But I'm letting go I'm givin' up the ghost But don't get me wrong I'll always love you that's why I wrote you this very last song I guess this is where we say goodbye I know I'll be alright Someday I'll be fine But just not tonight
1:32

Pain demands to be felt We brought Banban home around 2017. Papa was planning to pass her to one of his bowling buddies, but we begged, and somehow he smiled and said yes. She came with Lassy and Fudgie at first—those three tumbling through the house like they owned it. One by one, old age quietly took the others, leaving Banban as the last gentle giant of that little pack. She was always indoors, but every chance we got, we’d walk her slowly outside, her tail still sweeping the air like she was young again. I used to be only a cat person—those scrappy puspins were my world. But Banban? She never once snapped or pushed them away. She’d let them curl into her warmth, even nap beside her massive paws. I can still see her lying there, patient, eyes half-closed, as if saying, “It’s okay, little ones. You’re safe here.” That quiet kindness was her language. She carried us through everything. Papa’s death in 2019 left a hole nothing could fill—except Banban, still there at the gate, still wagging like he might walk through the door any second. The pandemic locked us in; Typhoon Ulysses tore the world apart outside; she stayed steady. Through tears, fear, silence, she was the one constant heartbeat we could touch. Every time I left the house, I came back with pasalubong just for her—warm pandesal, bits of chicken, her favorite treats. The second the gate creaked, there she was: ears up, eyes bright, that full-body wiggle of pure joy. No matter how heavy the day had been, her welcome cracked me open with light. Then Britney and Cabs arrived—tiny tornadoes of chaos. They’d nip at her ears, climb over her like she was furniture. Banban never growled. She’d just sigh that big, dramatic sigh, shift her weight, and let them win. Big sister to the end. January 2026 stole her hind legs without warning. We carried her, supported her, walked her anyway—whispering, “Come on, girl, just a little more.” I prayed until my throat hurt, bargained with God, promised anything if she’d just stand again. We bought every medicine, tried every trick. But this week her light started fading fast. Last Wednesday, I looked into those tired brown eyes and knew: we were down to hours. I sat on the floor beside her, forehead to forehead. I whispered sorry—for not walking her one more time around the block, for not sneaking her one extra treat (even though she was already the most spoiled girl in the world). I thanked her for every single day she chose us, for guarding our broken hearts, for being the thread that still tied me to Papa. I told her she didn’t have to fight anymore. “It’s okay to rest now, Banban. You’ve been so brave. I love you. Go find Papa—he’s waiting.” The room went still. Birds sang outside like they knew. Time stretched thin. Five minutes later, she sighed one last soft breath and slipped away—peaceful, no pain, just… gone. The tears haven’t stopped. She was my last living piece of him. Papa brought her home; now they’re together again, I have to believe that. I begged her to come back to us somehow, in some new fur and wagging tail. Coming home now is the hardest part. The gate is empty. No happy bark, no smiling face pressed to the bars, no warm body leaning into my legs. The silence screams. But I thank God—for the gift of her, for the gentle way He carried her home. I’ll keep praying she finds her way back. We love you beyond words, Banban. Run free, our sweetest Ate. Chase endless zoomies, roll in fields of treats, rest your head on Papa’s lap. Watch over us, okay? Until we meet again. I miss you with every breath. But heaven denied Destiny decried Something beautiful died Too soon But I'm letting go I'm givin' up the ghost But don't get me wrong I'll always love you that's why I wrote you this very last song I guess this is where we say goodbye I know I'll be alright Someday I'll be fine But just not tonight

1Jrome

19,721 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Mark Cuban just compared the most powerful AI on earth to a two-year-old in a high chair. The toddler won. Cuban: “A two-year-old on a high chair with a sippy cup knows that when she pushes that cup off, Mom’s going to come running and the baby’s going to be laughing its ass off. It knows the consequences of its actions.” Then he named the thing no one building AI wants to say out loud. Cuban: “If you ask ChatGPT or any of them something and it gives you bad advice, it has no idea what’s going to happen because you took that bad advice.” A system that passed the bar exam. Aced medical boards. Still can’t grasp what a child who can’t tie her own shoes already knows. The child understands cause and effect. AI understands pattern and prediction. They sound similar. They are not even close. A pattern tells you what comes next in a sequence. Consequence tells you what happens to the person standing at the end of it. One is math. The other is meaning. Cuban went further. Cuban: “If you were blind at an intersection and had the choice between your seeing-eye dog or holding up a phone with AI, I’m taking the seeing-eye dog every time.” Because the dog understands something no language model on earth understands. Stakes. The dog knows a wrong step means its owner gets hurt. The app knows a wrong step means a revised output. Hundreds of billions spent building systems that can write, reason, and diagnose. Not one of them loses sleep when the answer is wrong. A toddler pushing a cup off a tray runs a tighter feedback loop than every foundation model combined. The child doesn’t just predict the outcome. The child wants the reaction. Pushes the cup off the edge, watches it fall, watches Mom come running. Laughs. Because the child knew what would happen before the cup ever hit the floor. That gap between prediction and consequence isn’t a bug. It’s not getting patched in the next update. It is the unsolved problem of artificial intelligence. We didn’t build minds. We built mirrors. Mirrors don’t flinch when you walk into traffic.
1:10

Mark Cuban just compared the most powerful AI on earth to a two-year-old in a high chair. The toddler won. Cuban: “A two-year-old on a high chair with a sippy cup knows that when she pushes that cup off, Mom’s going to come running and the baby’s going to be laughing its ass off. It knows the consequences of its actions.” Then he named the thing no one building AI wants to say out loud. Cuban: “If you ask ChatGPT or any of them something and it gives you bad advice, it has no idea what’s going to happen because you took that bad advice.” A system that passed the bar exam. Aced medical boards. Still can’t grasp what a child who can’t tie her own shoes already knows. The child understands cause and effect. AI understands pattern and prediction. They sound similar. They are not even close. A pattern tells you what comes next in a sequence. Consequence tells you what happens to the person standing at the end of it. One is math. The other is meaning. Cuban went further. Cuban: “If you were blind at an intersection and had the choice between your seeing-eye dog or holding up a phone with AI, I’m taking the seeing-eye dog every time.” Because the dog understands something no language model on earth understands. Stakes. The dog knows a wrong step means its owner gets hurt. The app knows a wrong step means a revised output. Hundreds of billions spent building systems that can write, reason, and diagnose. Not one of them loses sleep when the answer is wrong. A toddler pushing a cup off a tray runs a tighter feedback loop than every foundation model combined. The child doesn’t just predict the outcome. The child wants the reaction. Pushes the cup off the edge, watches it fall, watches Mom come running. Laughs. Because the child knew what would happen before the cup ever hit the floor. That gap between prediction and consequence isn’t a bug. It’s not getting patched in the next update. It is the unsolved problem of artificial intelligence. We didn’t build minds. We built mirrors. Mirrors don’t flinch when you walk into traffic.

Dustin

47,919 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

she hovers rakan. i lock xayah without saying anything. we both know. the first few minutes are quiet. just farming. just existing in the same lane again. i forgot how she moves. or maybe i didn't. she positions like she's reading my mind. always in the right spot. always one step ahead of what i need before i need it. i throw feathers and she's already adjusting. creating space. pulling their attention so i can set up the angle. it's annoying how natural this feels. she engages and i swear to god she strokes that W key different than anyone else. soft then sudden. the way she drifts in and out. testing. teasing. waiting for the perfect moment. then she commits. flash R into both of them. no hesitation. no ping. she just expects me to be there. i am. i'm already autoing before she lands. feathers everywhere. she knocked them up and i pull everything back. double kill. silence on the call. just the sound of her breathing through the mic. "nice" she says. quiet. "yeah" i say. we don't talk about how we moved like one player. how her hands controlled her champion and somehow mine too. how i followed her in without thinking because my body remembered before my brain could stop it. she backs off after the fight and i watch her character retreat. smooth. patient. controlled. she always played like that. like she knew something i didn't. like every movement was deliberate. i used to watch her hands on the keyboard when we were together. the way her fingers danced between abilities. the way she'd posture up before an all-in. shoulders forward. leaning in. focused. i don't see her hands anymore. but i see her champion move and i remember exactly how she's sitting right now. some things you can't unlearn. after the game she says "that was clean" "yeah" i say. neither of us leaves the lobby. we're over each other. we're over who we were out of game we tell ourselves that. but in game? we'll never find better. and we both know it. study the saskio way
0:31

she hovers rakan. i lock xayah without saying anything. we both know. the first few minutes are quiet. just farming. just existing in the same lane again. i forgot how she moves. or maybe i didn't. she positions like she's reading my mind. always in the right spot. always one step ahead of what i need before i need it. i throw feathers and she's already adjusting. creating space. pulling their attention so i can set up the angle. it's annoying how natural this feels. she engages and i swear to god she strokes that W key different than anyone else. soft then sudden. the way she drifts in and out. testing. teasing. waiting for the perfect moment. then she commits. flash R into both of them. no hesitation. no ping. she just expects me to be there. i am. i'm already autoing before she lands. feathers everywhere. she knocked them up and i pull everything back. double kill. silence on the call. just the sound of her breathing through the mic. "nice" she says. quiet. "yeah" i say. we don't talk about how we moved like one player. how her hands controlled her champion and somehow mine too. how i followed her in without thinking because my body remembered before my brain could stop it. she backs off after the fight and i watch her character retreat. smooth. patient. controlled. she always played like that. like she knew something i didn't. like every movement was deliberate. i used to watch her hands on the keyboard when we were together. the way her fingers danced between abilities. the way she'd posture up before an all-in. shoulders forward. leaning in. focused. i don't see her hands anymore. but i see her champion move and i remember exactly how she's sitting right now. some things you can't unlearn. after the game she says "that was clean" "yeah" i say. neither of us leaves the lobby. we're over each other. we're over who we were out of game we tell ourselves that. but in game? we'll never find better. and we both know it. study the saskio way

Tony Chau

651,904 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Katie Telford’s Katie Telford career is a cesspool of scandals and allegations that scream corruption, privilege, and a sickening disregard for anything resembling integrity, her every move dripping with the stench of power abused and accountability dodged. Start with the 2016 moving expense scandal, where she and Gerald Butts gorged on $207,000 of taxpayer money to relocate to Ottawa after the Liberals took power, Telford herself pocketing a grotesque chunk before public outrage forced her to repay $23,373, while Butts had to cough up $20,299 plus another $25,141 for land transfer taxes, the two of them whining they followed the rules while Canadians barely scrape by, the whole affair a disgusting display of elitism that spits in the face of hardworking people. Then there’s the SNC-Lavalin debacle in 2019, a rancid pit of interference where the PMO, with Telford as Trudeau’s puppet master, allegedly pressured Jody Wilson-Raybould to let the corrupt Quebec firm off on bribery charges, Butts taking the fall and resigning while Telford sat pretty, her hands maybe not on the smoking gun but surely close enough to smell the powder, the Ethics Commissioner later slamming Trudeau for improper influence while Telford somehow skated free, her silence as damning as any confession. The 2019 lawsuit from Vivian Bercovici piles on more filth, the former ambassador accusing Telford of inflicting mental suffering by stonewalling her pension requests, a cruel little power trip that shows Telford’s alleged knack for crushing anyone who doesn’t kiss the Liberal ring, the claims unproven but fitting a pattern of petty vindictiveness that clings to her name like a bad odor. Her 2023 testimony on Chinese election interference is another masterclass in evasion, as she squirmed before a parliamentary committee, dodging questions about Beijing’s meddling in the 2019 and 2021 elections, refusing to address allegations of $250,000 in covert funding tied to 11 candidates, her vague deflections so infuriating that MPs called her out for stonewalling, leaving everyone convinced she’s hiding a mountain of dirt about the Liberals’ ties to foreign cash. Her cozy history with Butts, now a fat cat at the Eurasia Group, only deepens the rot, with his firm reportedly raking in over $1.5 million in government contracts since 2017, the kind of insider cronyism that makes your skin crawl, and Telford’s past with him in the PMO screaming of backroom deals and influence peddling, even if hard proof stays slippery. The Liberal-NDP pact in 2022, which she helped broker, gets slammed as a shameless power grab, a deal to prop up Trudeau’s sinking ship by selling out any shred of principle for votes, critics calling it a betrayal of democracy while Telford likely smirked, tightening her grip on power no matter who got screwed in the process. Then there’s the 2021 sexual misconduct cover-up allegations tied to her name, where posts on X claim she failed to inform Trudeau about serious accusations against General Jonathan Vance, Canada’s top soldier, and then orchestrated a cover-up to bury the truth, allegedly leaving victims to rot while she protected her own ass, a betrayal so vile it’s hard to stomach. Every scandal, every whisper of corruption sticks to her like tar, from SNC-Lavalin to foreign interference to cronyism with Butts, painting a picture of a woman who thrives on manipulation, control, and dodging the consequences, leaving a trail of broken trust and public disgust in her wake as Canadians are left to wonder how much more she’s buried in her climb to the top, her career a monument to everything wrong with politics, built on the backs of those she’s stepped over without a second thought.
4:03

Katie Telford’s Katie Telford career is a cesspool of scandals and allegations that scream corruption, privilege, and a sickening disregard for anything resembling integrity, her every move dripping with the stench of power abused and accountability dodged. Start with the 2016 moving expense scandal, where she and Gerald Butts gorged on $207,000 of taxpayer money to relocate to Ottawa after the Liberals took power, Telford herself pocketing a grotesque chunk before public outrage forced her to repay $23,373, while Butts had to cough up $20,299 plus another $25,141 for land transfer taxes, the two of them whining they followed the rules while Canadians barely scrape by, the whole affair a disgusting display of elitism that spits in the face of hardworking people. Then there’s the SNC-Lavalin debacle in 2019, a rancid pit of interference where the PMO, with Telford as Trudeau’s puppet master, allegedly pressured Jody Wilson-Raybould to let the corrupt Quebec firm off on bribery charges, Butts taking the fall and resigning while Telford sat pretty, her hands maybe not on the smoking gun but surely close enough to smell the powder, the Ethics Commissioner later slamming Trudeau for improper influence while Telford somehow skated free, her silence as damning as any confession. The 2019 lawsuit from Vivian Bercovici piles on more filth, the former ambassador accusing Telford of inflicting mental suffering by stonewalling her pension requests, a cruel little power trip that shows Telford’s alleged knack for crushing anyone who doesn’t kiss the Liberal ring, the claims unproven but fitting a pattern of petty vindictiveness that clings to her name like a bad odor. Her 2023 testimony on Chinese election interference is another masterclass in evasion, as she squirmed before a parliamentary committee, dodging questions about Beijing’s meddling in the 2019 and 2021 elections, refusing to address allegations of $250,000 in covert funding tied to 11 candidates, her vague deflections so infuriating that MPs called her out for stonewalling, leaving everyone convinced she’s hiding a mountain of dirt about the Liberals’ ties to foreign cash. Her cozy history with Butts, now a fat cat at the Eurasia Group, only deepens the rot, with his firm reportedly raking in over $1.5 million in government contracts since 2017, the kind of insider cronyism that makes your skin crawl, and Telford’s past with him in the PMO screaming of backroom deals and influence peddling, even if hard proof stays slippery. The Liberal-NDP pact in 2022, which she helped broker, gets slammed as a shameless power grab, a deal to prop up Trudeau’s sinking ship by selling out any shred of principle for votes, critics calling it a betrayal of democracy while Telford likely smirked, tightening her grip on power no matter who got screwed in the process. Then there’s the 2021 sexual misconduct cover-up allegations tied to her name, where posts on X claim she failed to inform Trudeau about serious accusations against General Jonathan Vance, Canada’s top soldier, and then orchestrated a cover-up to bury the truth, allegedly leaving victims to rot while she protected her own ass, a betrayal so vile it’s hard to stomach. Every scandal, every whisper of corruption sticks to her like tar, from SNC-Lavalin to foreign interference to cronyism with Butts, painting a picture of a woman who thrives on manipulation, control, and dodging the consequences, leaving a trail of broken trust and public disgust in her wake as Canadians are left to wonder how much more she’s buried in her climb to the top, her career a monument to everything wrong with politics, built on the backs of those she’s stepped over without a second thought.

Vote Canada

46,507 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The nearly 86 year old Ex Labour MP, Maori affairs Minister Dover Samuels tells Laws : “Shane Jones called me to come to this hikoi in Kaikohe to wake up this bloody ngapuhi iwi to the atrocities happening to our kids, but no bugger wants to do anything about it especially Māori themselves. As far as ngapuhi leadership is converned I have no faith in the born again unelected kaumātuas. Shane and I tried to shake them up about the issue but they got offended. They are too busy talking about themselves and hikois for the treaty when nothing was going to bloody happen, meanwhile the murder of children is going on under our roofs, smoking P is the culture. Māori have no leadership and it’s only them who can fix this. What has John Tamihere and TPM ever done for our people? nothing”. Māori leadership. There is none. Māori in leadership roles have continually been a failure over and over again. More concerned about grifting and causing division. Where is the introspection ? Where is courage and truth speaking ? Nah it’s all Marxist mumbo jumbo, while these self anointed faux Māori leaders hitch themselves to the radical gravy train. So here we have this catastrophic failure of culture, of leadership and yet the Govt is hell bent on adopting the “so called Māori approach” to everything. I’m sorry but the Māori approach is one of failure and murdered kids. Stick it up your ass. I am of ngapuhi descent, my grandmother married Dover Samuel’s mums brother, I know that area, and it’s a write off. Gangs, drugs and violence. It’s the pits. Mana Tahere twice backed out of an interview with Laws. He has has been anointed as some kind of ‘leader’ for Ngapuhi and apparently has a masters in indigenous leadership - the 38 year old also serves as an ‘equity’ expert on a health board in Northland. I think we can see where the problem is right there, he’s no leader. I 100% agree with Dover Samuels and with Michael Laws when he says - “I’m over this too many Māori children are dying, too many Māori have drug and violence issues, there is no Māori leadership” Catalya Remana Tangimetua Pepene tragically WILL NOT be the last Māori child murdered by her own family, she is just the latest statistic while the so called “Māori leadership” trumpet ‘dEcOlonIzAT10n’ and blame everyone else but them bloody selves, take responsibility and address this toxic mess that modern Māori culture now represents.
19:21

The nearly 86 year old Ex Labour MP, Maori affairs Minister Dover Samuels tells Laws : “Shane Jones called me to come to this hikoi in Kaikohe to wake up this bloody ngapuhi iwi to the atrocities happening to our kids, but no bugger wants to do anything about it especially Māori themselves. As far as ngapuhi leadership is converned I have no faith in the born again unelected kaumātuas. Shane and I tried to shake them up about the issue but they got offended. They are too busy talking about themselves and hikois for the treaty when nothing was going to bloody happen, meanwhile the murder of children is going on under our roofs, smoking P is the culture. Māori have no leadership and it’s only them who can fix this. What has John Tamihere and TPM ever done for our people? nothing”. Māori leadership. There is none. Māori in leadership roles have continually been a failure over and over again. More concerned about grifting and causing division. Where is the introspection ? Where is courage and truth speaking ? Nah it’s all Marxist mumbo jumbo, while these self anointed faux Māori leaders hitch themselves to the radical gravy train. So here we have this catastrophic failure of culture, of leadership and yet the Govt is hell bent on adopting the “so called Māori approach” to everything. I’m sorry but the Māori approach is one of failure and murdered kids. Stick it up your ass. I am of ngapuhi descent, my grandmother married Dover Samuel’s mums brother, I know that area, and it’s a write off. Gangs, drugs and violence. It’s the pits. Mana Tahere twice backed out of an interview with Laws. He has has been anointed as some kind of ‘leader’ for Ngapuhi and apparently has a masters in indigenous leadership - the 38 year old also serves as an ‘equity’ expert on a health board in Northland. I think we can see where the problem is right there, he’s no leader. I 100% agree with Dover Samuels and with Michael Laws when he says - “I’m over this too many Māori children are dying, too many Māori have drug and violence issues, there is no Māori leadership” Catalya Remana Tangimetua Pepene tragically WILL NOT be the last Māori child murdered by her own family, she is just the latest statistic while the so called “Māori leadership” trumpet ‘dEcOlonIzAT10n’ and blame everyone else but them bloody selves, take responsibility and address this toxic mess that modern Māori culture now represents.

Holyhekatuiteka

21,690 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

For 45 days, a woman in Agra told relatives and police that her husband had mysteriously disappeared. The family searched desperately for answers, unaware that the 44-year-old man's body lay buried beneath the bathroom floor of the very house they kept returning to. The chilling secret came to light only when police dug up newly laid tiles and unearthed the decomposed remains. Surendra Kumar Sharma had been missing since May 18, while his wife, Ruby, allegedly continued telling relatives and neighbours that he had gone somewhere and would return soon. A missing person's report was eventually registered on May 26, but the mystery surrounding his disappearance only deepened. As the investigation progressed, police found several inconsistencies in the statements they received. On Friday, officers revisited the house for verification in connection with an earlier case. During the visit, they found Ruby's behaviour suspicious. At the same time, Surendra's brother shared crucial information with investigators, prompting a thorough search of the house. That search led police to the bathroom, where freshly laid tiles and new plaster immediately caught their attention. Suspecting that something had been concealed beneath the floor, officers ordered the bathroom to be dug up. Moments later, they uncovered the decomposed body of Surendra buried beneath the tiles, exposing what investigators believe was an elaborate attempt to hide the crime. The gruesome discovery sent shockwaves through the neighbourhood as crowds gathered outside the house. According to the preliminary investigation, the accused buried the body inside the bathroom soon after the murder. Soil was poured over the body before the floor was plastered and covered with new tiles to erase any trace of the crime. Police are now investigating whether anyone else helped execute the conspiracy. During questioning, Ruby confessed to the murder. According to police, she revealed that she had arranged for a mason and labourers to carry out renovation work in the bathroom even before the incident. Investigators, however, said the exact motive behind the killing and the complete sequence of events will be established only after examining all evidence collected during the investigation. Surendra's brother, Anil Sharma, said the deceased consumed alcohol regularly, which often led to disputes between the couple. He said Ruby herself informed the family after Surendra went missing and later lodged the missing person's complaint. Despite searching for weeks, the family found no trace of him until police made the gruesome discovery. Police have sent the body for postmortem examination, while the forensic team has collected evidence from the house. Officials said they are probing the conspiracy, the possible involvement of other individuals, and every aspect of the case before taking further legal action. Hariparvat ACP Hemant Patel said over the phone that police had sent the body for postmortem and taken Surendra's wife into custody. He said investigators are questioning her about the murder and are also trying to determine whether anyone else was involved in carrying out the crime.
0:42

For 45 days, a woman in Agra told relatives and police that her husband had mysteriously disappeared. The family searched desperately for answers, unaware that the 44-year-old man's body lay buried beneath the bathroom floor of the very house they kept returning to. The chilling secret came to light only when police dug up newly laid tiles and unearthed the decomposed remains. Surendra Kumar Sharma had been missing since May 18, while his wife, Ruby, allegedly continued telling relatives and neighbours that he had gone somewhere and would return soon. A missing person's report was eventually registered on May 26, but the mystery surrounding his disappearance only deepened. As the investigation progressed, police found several inconsistencies in the statements they received. On Friday, officers revisited the house for verification in connection with an earlier case. During the visit, they found Ruby's behaviour suspicious. At the same time, Surendra's brother shared crucial information with investigators, prompting a thorough search of the house. That search led police to the bathroom, where freshly laid tiles and new plaster immediately caught their attention. Suspecting that something had been concealed beneath the floor, officers ordered the bathroom to be dug up. Moments later, they uncovered the decomposed body of Surendra buried beneath the tiles, exposing what investigators believe was an elaborate attempt to hide the crime. The gruesome discovery sent shockwaves through the neighbourhood as crowds gathered outside the house. According to the preliminary investigation, the accused buried the body inside the bathroom soon after the murder. Soil was poured over the body before the floor was plastered and covered with new tiles to erase any trace of the crime. Police are now investigating whether anyone else helped execute the conspiracy. During questioning, Ruby confessed to the murder. According to police, she revealed that she had arranged for a mason and labourers to carry out renovation work in the bathroom even before the incident. Investigators, however, said the exact motive behind the killing and the complete sequence of events will be established only after examining all evidence collected during the investigation. Surendra's brother, Anil Sharma, said the deceased consumed alcohol regularly, which often led to disputes between the couple. He said Ruby herself informed the family after Surendra went missing and later lodged the missing person's complaint. Despite searching for weeks, the family found no trace of him until police made the gruesome discovery. Police have sent the body for postmortem examination, while the forensic team has collected evidence from the house. Officials said they are probing the conspiracy, the possible involvement of other individuals, and every aspect of the case before taking further legal action. Hariparvat ACP Hemant Patel said over the phone that police had sent the body for postmortem and taken Surendra's wife into custody. He said investigators are questioning her about the murder and are also trying to determine whether anyone else was involved in carrying out the crime.

Hate Detector 🔍

21,830 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Analyzing Episode 55. Season 2 aka The Violence of Alignment If I visualize CihAl's journey for this season, a spiral tightening its rings comes to mind. There's always one problem after another, spiking in intensity and reaction. And, the weight of it is reflected in both Alya's increasingly somber demeanor. But, here's the thing. In every new problem, there's an echo of the old one, which leaves one with an inevitable feeling of deja vu - for the audience and the characters. We'll get to why towards the end of this analysis. For now, on we go. We kick off epi 55 with Cihan being introduced to Meryem *cough* dishrag *cough* by Sadakat. And what follows is a breakdown of her story with Cihan listening. However, when Meryem recounted her past woes, I focused less on her words and more on Cihan's words and expression. And what follows is a masterclass in the difference between sympathy and empathy. Kudos to Ozan Akbaba for portraying the difference. I couldn't help but compare the situation to when Cihan is listening to Alya's account of her past. With Alya, Cihan leans forward, barely moving. He listens, but his face tends to reflect his own emotion and mirrors Alya's at times - in other words, he's living those events with her. When he talks, his voice drops lower, but more importantly, there's a gentle softness meant to soothe. With Meryem, Cihan's body language is a tad more detached. When he's leaning forward in the seat, his hands are extended in front of him, clasped together, creating space. Then he leans back, one arm extended on the table, the other on his thigh. Again, there's this feel of distance. His voice remains soft, but there's no tenderness. He's not trying to alleviate, rather he's simply listening. Don't get me wrong, it's not like the guy doesn't feel bad for her, because what she relates shouldn't be experienced by anyone. But empathy goes beyond sympathy. Empathy is when you hurt with the one who's hurting. And that difference, to me, is clear between the two scenes. Long story short, when he's heard what Meryem's gone through, he offers to help get her out of prison because he feels responsible in part for her misfortunes. He says it's his 'duty' to help her. Here's what's interesting: when Meryem says his kindness and heart haven't changed, he gets uncomfortable. And after that, he's the one to get up from the chair, signaling the end of the conversation. Like he wants to get out of there, because some part of him that's not stupidly male understands Meryem's still attached to him, but he has no interest in that whatsoever. His method of saying goodbye is a handshake, again, a testament to his aloofness. And when Meryem hugs him, his hands remain at their sides; the man could have been a pillar. So, while he speaks not of Alya, the one time he takes her name, he drives the message across that 'she's no one ordinary' and 'tread carefully'. Honestly, I don't think he wants to talk about Alya to Meryem. Not because Alya's not important, but because Alya is too important. The part of his life that Alya represents is his alone, and he's very possessive about sharing that with anyone. To him, Meryem is a past that exists, but one that he would erase if he had the choice, because it hurts Alya. And that's pretty much the whole feel of this conversation. He wants to help Meryem, but he also wants her gone because her presence is a source of discomfort to Alya. Speaking of discomforts, the next scene I want to talk about is when the massive turd, who happens to be Alya's ex-husband, goes to the hospital to threaten her some more. Seriously, this character is a step short of absolute psycho. He's incapable of true emotion, just like his mother. Anyway, when Alya is explaining why she hasn't moved out yet, the zombie's eyes zero in on her wedding band. And, of course, being who he is, he absolutely ignores the topic of Deniz, his own flesh and blood, and instead, wants the ring gone because it symbolizes Alya's love and attachment to Cihan. Thankfully, Cihan arrives in time to push away the zombie and to hear Alya proclaim that while Boran has the power to use her son and distance her from Cihan physically, he has no power over her heart and who reigns over it. Now, think back to that conversation where Deniz wants her to pick between Cihan and himself. And Cihan says Deniz's throne (or place) in her heart is so secure, he's happy to live in the shadow of that throne. While Alya smiles at Cihan's response, she also looks miserable later at the thought of not being able to tell Cihan that things aren't exactly so. However, I think she manages to get her point across in this scene without even realizing it. Because while she may make sacrifices for her son, no amount of blackmail, pain, or hurt can remove Cihan's love from her heart. Now, I don't know about you, but that sounds almost like an equal footing. The only difference is that she's bound to protect her son, because, unlike Cihan, he can't protect himself. And that's what leads Cihan to later tell Alya that her words are etched across his heart, and that he's never felt that loved by anyone. Curiously enough, this scene also brings the spotlight on two other details: Alya's 'anka' side and the wedding ring. Both of which will feature rather greatly, in the coming episodes, I think. Now, there's a rumor going around that Alya will take off her wedding ring. And, I don't know, the fact that Cihan's almost preening at Alya, still wearing the ring, and Alya saying 'I couldn't take it off' tells me that's not what's going to happen. For some reason, I'm beginning to get the vibes of a showdown of trust in the same vein as episode 27. Now you may argue that Cihan actually tells Alya about Mine's pregnancy in that episode, but CihAl have had a long journey since then. Alya has seen Cihan choose her over Boran with her own eyes. She's seen the lengths the man has gone to for her and Deniz. So, yes, she might be pissed about something or the other related to Meryem in future episodes, but her taking off the ring seems not within her character somehow. But hey, that's just me, and I could be wrong. Anyway, the final scene I want to talk about is, of course, the ending. Everyone kept focusing on why Cihan allowed Meryem to hold his hands, but I focused on his words. Because he very clearly tells Meryem that he's no longer in love with her, that he's moved on, and that she should not hang about in the hopes of that ever changing. In his own way, Cihan is quite ruthless here. He draws a line, but his words are designed not to hurt, because he's not an ahole. He just wants dishrag to understand that even the thought of Alya being hurt pains him more now than anything else. And, he's not very kind to people who try to hurt Alya. It's a disclosure and warning, but in the form of steel wrapped in satin. Now, let's go back to the beginning for a bit, where I mentioned spiraling events. See, I somehow thought that those vows Cihal took 'savaşta, bedelde, kararda, kaderde, aşkta' were linear levels. That they'd clear them one by one and get to love. But when you see the overall structure of their journey in this season, it's not linear at all. Because all those things have existed in one form or another since ep 29. There's always an element of all of these conditions in every episode. Which is why we keep thinking, wait a minute, we've been here before. But as I said, the spiral is tightening itself. With every episode, the stakes are raised higher, and CihAl are pushed a little bit closer to the edge. Almost like the deep breath before the plunge. And here’s where things get interesting. Because what feels like repetition is not actually stagnation, it’s confrontation deferred, coming back sharper each time. Every cycle brings them back to the same point. Their love deepens, fear follows, a decision is made in the name of protection, and that decision creates distance instead of resolution. Which brings me back to the vows - savaşta, bedelde, kararda, kaderde, aşkta. I was wrong to think of them as steps. They’re not something Cihan and Alya are moving towards; they’re something CihAl are already inside of. Every episode is them living those vows in real time. But with every new episode, the pressure mounts, like music builds to a crescendo. And yet, within all of that, aşk remains. Not as a reward at the end of the journey. But as the one thing that refuses to disappear, no matter how many times everything else goes wrong. And maybe that's why episode 55 feels the way it does. It creates the illusion that everything is falling apart, yet again, when in reality, everything is being forced into alignment. Something is moving all the pieces on the chessboard for an ultimate showdown. And the process gets more violent by the minute. Cihan hides the truth because he thinks love needs protection. Alya experiences that same act as distance, almost betrayal. Meanwhile, Boran and Sadakat keep pushing, and Meryem drops like a freaking bomb at the worst possible moment. Suddenly, everything that could have remained unsaid, unresolved, or postponed is dragged into the open. This has all the hallmarks of a breaking point. Note, I said breaking point, not breakdown. Because, unlike breakdowns, breaking points are used for revelations. I guess what I'm trying to say is things are headed towards alignment, not just for the overall story, but also CihAl's journey individually. Because Cihan and Alya also keep repeating their mistakes. Their growth requires something along the lines of a push, too. So, we have war, sacrifice, decisions, fate, and love, all coming to a head. And while there are plenty of reasons to feel ominous, I personally don't. The story is no longer about them loving each other - we're well past that. It’s about whether they can finally stand in that love openly and without any fear. Because everything is pushing them toward a breaking point, not to destroy them, I think, but to shape them into who they need to be. And if there’s one thing CihAl have proven since day one, it’s this - they don’t fall apart under pressure, they grow stronger, and they survive the impossible. #CihAl #UzakŞehir
2:51

Analyzing Episode 55. Season 2 aka The Violence of Alignment If I visualize CihAl's journey for this season, a spiral tightening its rings comes to mind. There's always one problem after another, spiking in intensity and reaction. And, the weight of it is reflected in both Alya's increasingly somber demeanor. But, here's the thing. In every new problem, there's an echo of the old one, which leaves one with an inevitable feeling of deja vu - for the audience and the characters. We'll get to why towards the end of this analysis. For now, on we go. We kick off epi 55 with Cihan being introduced to Meryem *cough* dishrag *cough* by Sadakat. And what follows is a breakdown of her story with Cihan listening. However, when Meryem recounted her past woes, I focused less on her words and more on Cihan's words and expression. And what follows is a masterclass in the difference between sympathy and empathy. Kudos to Ozan Akbaba for portraying the difference. I couldn't help but compare the situation to when Cihan is listening to Alya's account of her past. With Alya, Cihan leans forward, barely moving. He listens, but his face tends to reflect his own emotion and mirrors Alya's at times - in other words, he's living those events with her. When he talks, his voice drops lower, but more importantly, there's a gentle softness meant to soothe. With Meryem, Cihan's body language is a tad more detached. When he's leaning forward in the seat, his hands are extended in front of him, clasped together, creating space. Then he leans back, one arm extended on the table, the other on his thigh. Again, there's this feel of distance. His voice remains soft, but there's no tenderness. He's not trying to alleviate, rather he's simply listening. Don't get me wrong, it's not like the guy doesn't feel bad for her, because what she relates shouldn't be experienced by anyone. But empathy goes beyond sympathy. Empathy is when you hurt with the one who's hurting. And that difference, to me, is clear between the two scenes. Long story short, when he's heard what Meryem's gone through, he offers to help get her out of prison because he feels responsible in part for her misfortunes. He says it's his 'duty' to help her. Here's what's interesting: when Meryem says his kindness and heart haven't changed, he gets uncomfortable. And after that, he's the one to get up from the chair, signaling the end of the conversation. Like he wants to get out of there, because some part of him that's not stupidly male understands Meryem's still attached to him, but he has no interest in that whatsoever. His method of saying goodbye is a handshake, again, a testament to his aloofness. And when Meryem hugs him, his hands remain at their sides; the man could have been a pillar. So, while he speaks not of Alya, the one time he takes her name, he drives the message across that 'she's no one ordinary' and 'tread carefully'. Honestly, I don't think he wants to talk about Alya to Meryem. Not because Alya's not important, but because Alya is too important. The part of his life that Alya represents is his alone, and he's very possessive about sharing that with anyone. To him, Meryem is a past that exists, but one that he would erase if he had the choice, because it hurts Alya. And that's pretty much the whole feel of this conversation. He wants to help Meryem, but he also wants her gone because her presence is a source of discomfort to Alya. Speaking of discomforts, the next scene I want to talk about is when the massive turd, who happens to be Alya's ex-husband, goes to the hospital to threaten her some more. Seriously, this character is a step short of absolute psycho. He's incapable of true emotion, just like his mother. Anyway, when Alya is explaining why she hasn't moved out yet, the zombie's eyes zero in on her wedding band. And, of course, being who he is, he absolutely ignores the topic of Deniz, his own flesh and blood, and instead, wants the ring gone because it symbolizes Alya's love and attachment to Cihan. Thankfully, Cihan arrives in time to push away the zombie and to hear Alya proclaim that while Boran has the power to use her son and distance her from Cihan physically, he has no power over her heart and who reigns over it. Now, think back to that conversation where Deniz wants her to pick between Cihan and himself. And Cihan says Deniz's throne (or place) in her heart is so secure, he's happy to live in the shadow of that throne. While Alya smiles at Cihan's response, she also looks miserable later at the thought of not being able to tell Cihan that things aren't exactly so. However, I think she manages to get her point across in this scene without even realizing it. Because while she may make sacrifices for her son, no amount of blackmail, pain, or hurt can remove Cihan's love from her heart. Now, I don't know about you, but that sounds almost like an equal footing. The only difference is that she's bound to protect her son, because, unlike Cihan, he can't protect himself. And that's what leads Cihan to later tell Alya that her words are etched across his heart, and that he's never felt that loved by anyone. Curiously enough, this scene also brings the spotlight on two other details: Alya's 'anka' side and the wedding ring. Both of which will feature rather greatly, in the coming episodes, I think. Now, there's a rumor going around that Alya will take off her wedding ring. And, I don't know, the fact that Cihan's almost preening at Alya, still wearing the ring, and Alya saying 'I couldn't take it off' tells me that's not what's going to happen. For some reason, I'm beginning to get the vibes of a showdown of trust in the same vein as episode 27. Now you may argue that Cihan actually tells Alya about Mine's pregnancy in that episode, but CihAl have had a long journey since then. Alya has seen Cihan choose her over Boran with her own eyes. She's seen the lengths the man has gone to for her and Deniz. So, yes, she might be pissed about something or the other related to Meryem in future episodes, but her taking off the ring seems not within her character somehow. But hey, that's just me, and I could be wrong. Anyway, the final scene I want to talk about is, of course, the ending. Everyone kept focusing on why Cihan allowed Meryem to hold his hands, but I focused on his words. Because he very clearly tells Meryem that he's no longer in love with her, that he's moved on, and that she should not hang about in the hopes of that ever changing. In his own way, Cihan is quite ruthless here. He draws a line, but his words are designed not to hurt, because he's not an ahole. He just wants dishrag to understand that even the thought of Alya being hurt pains him more now than anything else. And, he's not very kind to people who try to hurt Alya. It's a disclosure and warning, but in the form of steel wrapped in satin. Now, let's go back to the beginning for a bit, where I mentioned spiraling events. See, I somehow thought that those vows Cihal took 'savaşta, bedelde, kararda, kaderde, aşkta' were linear levels. That they'd clear them one by one and get to love. But when you see the overall structure of their journey in this season, it's not linear at all. Because all those things have existed in one form or another since ep 29. There's always an element of all of these conditions in every episode. Which is why we keep thinking, wait a minute, we've been here before. But as I said, the spiral is tightening itself. With every episode, the stakes are raised higher, and CihAl are pushed a little bit closer to the edge. Almost like the deep breath before the plunge. And here’s where things get interesting. Because what feels like repetition is not actually stagnation, it’s confrontation deferred, coming back sharper each time. Every cycle brings them back to the same point. Their love deepens, fear follows, a decision is made in the name of protection, and that decision creates distance instead of resolution. Which brings me back to the vows - savaşta, bedelde, kararda, kaderde, aşkta. I was wrong to think of them as steps. They’re not something Cihan and Alya are moving towards; they’re something CihAl are already inside of. Every episode is them living those vows in real time. But with every new episode, the pressure mounts, like music builds to a crescendo. And yet, within all of that, aşk remains. Not as a reward at the end of the journey. But as the one thing that refuses to disappear, no matter how many times everything else goes wrong. And maybe that's why episode 55 feels the way it does. It creates the illusion that everything is falling apart, yet again, when in reality, everything is being forced into alignment. Something is moving all the pieces on the chessboard for an ultimate showdown. And the process gets more violent by the minute. Cihan hides the truth because he thinks love needs protection. Alya experiences that same act as distance, almost betrayal. Meanwhile, Boran and Sadakat keep pushing, and Meryem drops like a freaking bomb at the worst possible moment. Suddenly, everything that could have remained unsaid, unresolved, or postponed is dragged into the open. This has all the hallmarks of a breaking point. Note, I said breaking point, not breakdown. Because, unlike breakdowns, breaking points are used for revelations. I guess what I'm trying to say is things are headed towards alignment, not just for the overall story, but also CihAl's journey individually. Because Cihan and Alya also keep repeating their mistakes. Their growth requires something along the lines of a push, too. So, we have war, sacrifice, decisions, fate, and love, all coming to a head. And while there are plenty of reasons to feel ominous, I personally don't. The story is no longer about them loving each other - we're well past that. It’s about whether they can finally stand in that love openly and without any fear. Because everything is pushing them toward a breaking point, not to destroy them, I think, but to shape them into who they need to be. And if there’s one thing CihAl have proven since day one, it’s this - they don’t fall apart under pressure, they grow stronger, and they survive the impossible. #CihAl #UzakŞehir

CocoLoco

21,061 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten