Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨🚨NO JUSTICE: Alameda County District Attorney's Office refuses to prosecute for assault and robbery. I just heard from Sharon Carney, the Deputy DA that the DA will not be arresting the man who attacked me and stole my phone and signs at a bike race in Livermore last September.... show more

Beth Bourne

58,081 subscribers

36,989 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Sağlık & İyilik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

MUST WATCH 🚨: NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”

MUST WATCH 🚨: NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”

Dr Charlie Ward

114,648 görüntüleme • 14 saat önce

HANK JOHNSON: Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false? JACK SMITH: Yes JOHNSON: And did your investigation uncover sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump publicly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him while he privately acknowledged he lost? SMITH: Yes. We cited instances of that JOHNSON: Yet, here we see on the 5th anniversary of the insurrection, the Trump White House propaganda machine is still promoting the stolen election theory on a government webpage

HANK JOHNSON: Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false? JACK SMITH: Yes JOHNSON: And did your investigation uncover sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump publicly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him while he privately acknowledged he lost? SMITH: Yes. We cited instances of that JOHNSON: Yet, here we see on the 5th anniversary of the insurrection, the Trump White House propaganda machine is still promoting the stolen election theory on a government webpage

Aaron Rupar

316,735 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Justice Minister Fraser heralds Carney government's crackdown on crime: "We will not accept a Canada where people fear that they're going to be attacked at random in the streets and that the offender will be released with impunity"

Justice Minister Fraser heralds Carney government's crackdown on crime: "We will not accept a Canada where people fear that they're going to be attacked at random in the streets and that the offender will be released with impunity"

Riley Donovan

63,090 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”

RedWave Press

212,892 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🚨MSNBC: The central district of California, the top political ally of trump there, and who runs that office acting, if you will, as the U.S. Attorney, Bill Essayli — sources have told us that he was PRESSING FOR WEEKS for his line attorneys (civil servants) to basically bring a criminal investigation or a criminal case against Gavin Newsom. That is NOT how the DOJ works. That is against the manual, the protocol, the regulations in some cases. The DOJ and the FBI have strict rules about when you open an investigation. It's based on evidence and a reasonable, articulable basis to believe a crime has occurred. Evidence of a crime is where you start, not with a dartboard of people who Donald Trump doesn’t like and that is a worry in that office.

🚨MSNBC: The central district of California, the top political ally of trump there, and who runs that office acting, if you will, as the U.S. Attorney, Bill Essayli — sources have told us that he was PRESSING FOR WEEKS for his line attorneys (civil servants) to basically bring a criminal investigation or a criminal case against Gavin Newsom. That is NOT how the DOJ works. That is against the manual, the protocol, the regulations in some cases. The DOJ and the FBI have strict rules about when you open an investigation. It's based on evidence and a reasonable, articulable basis to believe a crime has occurred. Evidence of a crime is where you start, not with a dartboard of people who Donald Trump doesn’t like and that is a worry in that office.

Newsom News

24,596 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨🚨 Juror in #RobertRoberson’s trial just testified that she now believes he is INNOCENT, that the entire case against him was 'shaken baby syndrome' - not beating - and that the jury did not have all the evidence. I keep being told to believe the jury. So I went and found an actual juror from 2003. She couldn’t wait to testify. Here’s what she had to say: Fact: this was ONLY a shaken baby case. Fact: the prosecution never gave evidence that Nikki was beaten. Fact: the jury knew nothing about the severity of Nikki’s illness and her extensive history of illness. Fact: the jury did NOT hear everything they needed to in order to make a correct decision in this case. Fact: this juror, having learned the new scientific evidence, now believes Robert is INNOCENT and would NOT have voted to convict. I believe this juror, who knows more about the trial than those opining on Twitter. Justice demands a new trial. Watch 👇 #txlege

🚨🚨 Juror in #RobertRoberson’s trial just testified that she now believes he is INNOCENT, that the entire case against him was 'shaken baby syndrome' - not beating - and that the jury did not have all the evidence. I keep being told to believe the jury. So I went and found an actual juror from 2003. She couldn’t wait to testify. Here’s what she had to say: Fact: this was ONLY a shaken baby case. Fact: the prosecution never gave evidence that Nikki was beaten. Fact: the jury knew nothing about the severity of Nikki’s illness and her extensive history of illness. Fact: the jury did NOT hear everything they needed to in order to make a correct decision in this case. Fact: this juror, having learned the new scientific evidence, now believes Robert is INNOCENT and would NOT have voted to convict. I believe this juror, who knows more about the trial than those opining on Twitter. Justice demands a new trial. Watch 👇 #txlege

Brian Harrison

26,944 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

NEW: Georgia State Rep Mesha Mainor Suing DA Fani Willis “We're starting to see, there's a pattern of corruption within the district attorney's office” Proven falsified evidence out of DA Fani Willis office “Tried to get my son to take a 20-year plea deal by falsifying evidence.” “I'm the father of Casey Watley who's been incarcerated in Fulton County Jail for five years now. And as we're starting to see, there's a pattern of corruption within the district attorney's office. My son, like I say, has been incarcerated five years. The attorney he had was a current, a prior district attorney who had worked with Fannie Willis previously. They came back and stated that they found evidence in my son's case after there was no evidence. They came back and said they found evidence and they had found fingerprints. Well, it came to find out in court that that was a lie. They said a second testing had been done and my son's fingerprints were found on the scene and that was a lie. The attorney, Darryl Korn, tried to get my son to take a 20-year plea deal by falsifying evidence. And as you can see, corruption is just running rampant within Fulton County Jail. It's time for something to be done, man. We gotta do something. Y'all allowing these kids to be locked up, knowing that lady is corrupt. She spent the money that was meant to help the kids, and then she re-coded. She re-coded all the young people, after she spent the money that was meant to help them to create a safe environment for them not to have to be out here in these gangs. Now let's ask her what she did with that money. It's time to do something to clean up Fullerton County. We're not talking about tomorrow. We need to start today. You got over 800 people in that jail who shouldn't be there. Haven't been indicted. They won't take them to trial. How is that justice? And you know what the crazy thing is? Fulton County, sit back and watch it.”

NEW: Georgia State Rep Mesha Mainor Suing DA Fani Willis “We're starting to see, there's a pattern of corruption within the district attorney's office” Proven falsified evidence out of DA Fani Willis office “Tried to get my son to take a 20-year plea deal by falsifying evidence.” “I'm the father of Casey Watley who's been incarcerated in Fulton County Jail for five years now. And as we're starting to see, there's a pattern of corruption within the district attorney's office. My son, like I say, has been incarcerated five years. The attorney he had was a current, a prior district attorney who had worked with Fannie Willis previously. They came back and stated that they found evidence in my son's case after there was no evidence. They came back and said they found evidence and they had found fingerprints. Well, it came to find out in court that that was a lie. They said a second testing had been done and my son's fingerprints were found on the scene and that was a lie. The attorney, Darryl Korn, tried to get my son to take a 20-year plea deal by falsifying evidence. And as you can see, corruption is just running rampant within Fulton County Jail. It's time for something to be done, man. We gotta do something. Y'all allowing these kids to be locked up, knowing that lady is corrupt. She spent the money that was meant to help the kids, and then she re-coded. She re-coded all the young people, after she spent the money that was meant to help them to create a safe environment for them not to have to be out here in these gangs. Now let's ask her what she did with that money. It's time to do something to clean up Fullerton County. We're not talking about tomorrow. We need to start today. You got over 800 people in that jail who shouldn't be there. Haven't been indicted. They won't take them to trial. How is that justice? And you know what the crazy thing is? Fulton County, sit back and watch it.”

Wall Street Apes

604,514 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

.jeaninepirro: “Now, I want to make something perfectly clear. Violence against anyone in this district will not be tolerated, especially violence, which has hate at its core and is the genesis of violence. The President put me here to do a job to clean up the District, to make sure that crime doesn’t overshadow this phenomenal city, our nation’s capital. And I have, throughout my career, fought anti-Semitism for 32 years as a prosecutor and a judge. I do so, I fight hate crimes with a vengeance, so don’t even think about targeting people in this district because of who they are or because of where they are from. I promise you, justice will be swift and it will be certain and I will work furiously and diligently with my phenomenal staff to make sure that we prosecute every one of these cases. This is the nation’s capital. This is where we celebrate unity. Hate has no place, but justice will rule.”

.jeaninepirro: “Now, I want to make something perfectly clear. Violence against anyone in this district will not be tolerated, especially violence, which has hate at its core and is the genesis of violence. The President put me here to do a job to clean up the District, to make sure that crime doesn’t overshadow this phenomenal city, our nation’s capital. And I have, throughout my career, fought anti-Semitism for 32 years as a prosecutor and a judge. I do so, I fight hate crimes with a vengeance, so don’t even think about targeting people in this district because of who they are or because of where they are from. I promise you, justice will be swift and it will be certain and I will work furiously and diligently with my phenomenal staff to make sure that we prosecute every one of these cases. This is the nation’s capital. This is where we celebrate unity. Hate has no place, but justice will rule.”

Curtis Houck

32,933 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Let’s listen to attorney Baron Coleman to see what he thinks about ”the mountain of evidence” that was promised to the public. There doesn’t have to be a conspiracy involved at all in this case. I am not suggesting that. The question is if you/me/anyone/the jury would send a person to death IF (1) there isn’t enough substance to convince a jury about ’guilt beyond a reasonable doubt’ AND (2) there’s no alternative assassin presented. Hopefully the answer is ’no’ (because that could be you/me/anyone/the jury sitting in Tyler Robinson’s chair). My point is that the trial is about Tyler Robinson’s guilt. The defense doesn’t need an alternative theory about who killed Charlie Kirk to prove his guilt (just like the defense in the OJ Simpson case didn’t need an alternative theory about who killed Nicole Brown). It’s up to the prosecution to prove guilt and that’s what will ultimately matter in the trial.

Let’s listen to attorney Baron Coleman to see what he thinks about ”the mountain of evidence” that was promised to the public. There doesn’t have to be a conspiracy involved at all in this case. I am not suggesting that. The question is if you/me/anyone/the jury would send a person to death IF (1) there isn’t enough substance to convince a jury about ’guilt beyond a reasonable doubt’ AND (2) there’s no alternative assassin presented. Hopefully the answer is ’no’ (because that could be you/me/anyone/the jury sitting in Tyler Robinson’s chair). My point is that the trial is about Tyler Robinson’s guilt. The defense doesn’t need an alternative theory about who killed Charlie Kirk to prove his guilt (just like the defense in the OJ Simpson case didn’t need an alternative theory about who killed Nicole Brown). It’s up to the prosecution to prove guilt and that’s what will ultimately matter in the trial.

Turtle (𝔦, 𝔦)

10,753 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Rosie Barton is either ignoring Poilievre's words or is deliberately misleading the CBC audience. First she goes along with the Carney story that he was asked to be Finance Minister under Harper "Harper's former director of communications responded to this by saying Carney's not telling the whole story and that Harper in no way supports Carney." Next she says "But we also heard Poilievre doubling down on the need to axe the consumer carbon tax, even though no Liberal leadership candidate supports it going forward." Carney is keeping a Carbon Tax and here is what Poilievre says about it "And after much reflection, I have concluded that the carbon tax will be an even bigger issue in the coming election than we thought." "He said just a few days ago that he doesn't want to "axe the tax."" "Mr. Carney's new and bigger carbon tax will help America take every industrial job from Canada." It's pretty clear that Poilievre is fighting Carney and the CBC!

Rosie Barton is either ignoring Poilievre's words or is deliberately misleading the CBC audience. First she goes along with the Carney story that he was asked to be Finance Minister under Harper "Harper's former director of communications responded to this by saying Carney's not telling the whole story and that Harper in no way supports Carney." Next she says "But we also heard Poilievre doubling down on the need to axe the consumer carbon tax, even though no Liberal leadership candidate supports it going forward." Carney is keeping a Carbon Tax and here is what Poilievre says about it "And after much reflection, I have concluded that the carbon tax will be an even bigger issue in the coming election than we thought." "He said just a few days ago that he doesn't want to "axe the tax."" "Mr. Carney's new and bigger carbon tax will help America take every industrial job from Canada." It's pretty clear that Poilievre is fighting Carney and the CBC!

cbcwatcher

127,680 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨OVER MY DEAD BODY! Tim Walz just made it clear he has NO INTENTION of resigning although he ADMITTED that he will be held accountable for his CRIMES. "I‘m not going anywhere and you can make all your request for me to resign. Over my dead body will that happen. I will fight this thing to the very end to make the state better" "I am accountable for this. And because of that accountability I am not running for office again." He should NOT be allowed to escape TRUE accountability by withdrawing from a race. ARREST TIM WALZ!

🚨OVER MY DEAD BODY! Tim Walz just made it clear he has NO INTENTION of resigning although he ADMITTED that he will be held accountable for his CRIMES. "I‘m not going anywhere and you can make all your request for me to resign. Over my dead body will that happen. I will fight this thing to the very end to make the state better" "I am accountable for this. And because of that accountability I am not running for office again." He should NOT be allowed to escape TRUE accountability by withdrawing from a race. ARREST TIM WALZ!

Gunther Eagleman™

172,773 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

My hope is this trial in Florida so Mr. Castro faces a jury of his peers in the nation that stands for freedom, liberty and opportunity - not dictatorship. We want to see justice and justice will be done. Don’t believe us? Go ask the former head of Venezuela.

My hope is this trial in Florida so Mr. Castro faces a jury of his peers in the nation that stands for freedom, liberty and opportunity - not dictatorship. We want to see justice and justice will be done. Don’t believe us? Go ask the former head of Venezuela.

Byron Donalds

25,499 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

REASONABLE DOUBT REASON # 1: #KarenReadTrial If a medical examiner couldn’t even determine #JohnOKeefe’s death was a homicide, how can anyone on the jury? Fun Fact: Over 4 months after Karen Read was first arrested, on June 10, 2022, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office upgraded her charges from manslaughter to second degree murder despite the fact that their medical examiner couldn’t even determine if it was a homicide. At that time in June 2022, the DA’s Office said that while some of Officer O’Keefe’s injuries were apparently known, the full autopsy findings were purportedly “not complete”. Hmm… 🤔 Was it that they were “not complete”? Or was it that they were complete but didn’t fit your narrative? The DA’s Office further went on to state: "While the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has accepted the case and will determine the cause and manner of death.” Despite apparently having neither a cause nor manner of death determination, apparently someone thought it was a good idea to charge Karen Read with not only manslaughter, but also second degree murder. Antithetical to the entire purpose of an investigation, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office and its Massachusetts State Police investigators don’t follow the evidence. Instead, they desperately twist and contort to try to make the evidence fit their narrative. Is this how we get to the truth? Is this why Michael Proctor was texting Trooper David DiCicco on April 28, 2022—in the lead up to the state grand jury to try to secure an indictment on upgraded charges—about how he wasn’t following the evidence in this case, but instead was trying to pressure the medical examiner to give him the determinations he wanted? The DA’s Office itself subsequently said “the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall” and didn’t have a cause or manner of death determination! 🤯 THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. Prosecutors have a duty to pursue justice. They have ethical obligations. Per ABA’s Standards for the Prosecution Function, Standard 3-4.6 says that: “A prosecutor should not seek an indictment unless the prosecutor reasonably believes the charges are supported by probable cause and that there will be admissible evidence sufficient to support the charges beyond reasonable doubt at trial.” This particularly applies to the Quality and Scope of Evidence Before a Grand Jury. Yet, despite having the definition of reasonable doubt, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office moved ahead with charges and upgraded charges against Karen anyway… …because, hey, according to them it could’ve been an “accidental fall”… …which would mean that Karen Read did not kill John O’Keefe, and she’s entirely innocent… …but who cares about the truth anyways? Apparently not this DA’s Office. It’s not like someone’s life isn’t hanging in the balance or anything. I guess this all explains why the Commonwealth wanted to conceal these inconvenient truths—that John’s manner of death could not be determined—evidence exculpatory to Karen Read. They sought to preclude this from the jury at trial (per their Motion In Limine to keep out John’s manner of death evidence)—because, forget about trying to get at the truth of the matter! This was never about justice. ——— VIDEO about reasonable doubt (attached) — Attorney David Howard gives one of my favorite analogy’s for reasonable doubt. Where was there not reasonable doubt in Karen Read’s case? I’m beyond eager to hear any of the jurors from her trial explain this. Anyone have any ideas? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenRead #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead #PoliceCorruption

REASONABLE DOUBT REASON # 1: #KarenReadTrial If a medical examiner couldn’t even determine #JohnOKeefe’s death was a homicide, how can anyone on the jury? Fun Fact: Over 4 months after Karen Read was first arrested, on June 10, 2022, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office upgraded her charges from manslaughter to second degree murder despite the fact that their medical examiner couldn’t even determine if it was a homicide. At that time in June 2022, the DA’s Office said that while some of Officer O’Keefe’s injuries were apparently known, the full autopsy findings were purportedly “not complete”. Hmm… 🤔 Was it that they were “not complete”? Or was it that they were complete but didn’t fit your narrative? The DA’s Office further went on to state: "While the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has accepted the case and will determine the cause and manner of death.” Despite apparently having neither a cause nor manner of death determination, apparently someone thought it was a good idea to charge Karen Read with not only manslaughter, but also second degree murder. Antithetical to the entire purpose of an investigation, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office and its Massachusetts State Police investigators don’t follow the evidence. Instead, they desperately twist and contort to try to make the evidence fit their narrative. Is this how we get to the truth? Is this why Michael Proctor was texting Trooper David DiCicco on April 28, 2022—in the lead up to the state grand jury to try to secure an indictment on upgraded charges—about how he wasn’t following the evidence in this case, but instead was trying to pressure the medical examiner to give him the determinations he wanted? The DA’s Office itself subsequently said “the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall” and didn’t have a cause or manner of death determination! 🤯 THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. Prosecutors have a duty to pursue justice. They have ethical obligations. Per ABA’s Standards for the Prosecution Function, Standard 3-4.6 says that: “A prosecutor should not seek an indictment unless the prosecutor reasonably believes the charges are supported by probable cause and that there will be admissible evidence sufficient to support the charges beyond reasonable doubt at trial.” This particularly applies to the Quality and Scope of Evidence Before a Grand Jury. Yet, despite having the definition of reasonable doubt, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office moved ahead with charges and upgraded charges against Karen anyway… …because, hey, according to them it could’ve been an “accidental fall”… …which would mean that Karen Read did not kill John O’Keefe, and she’s entirely innocent… …but who cares about the truth anyways? Apparently not this DA’s Office. It’s not like someone’s life isn’t hanging in the balance or anything. I guess this all explains why the Commonwealth wanted to conceal these inconvenient truths—that John’s manner of death could not be determined—evidence exculpatory to Karen Read. They sought to preclude this from the jury at trial (per their Motion In Limine to keep out John’s manner of death evidence)—because, forget about trying to get at the truth of the matter! This was never about justice. ——— VIDEO about reasonable doubt (attached) — Attorney David Howard gives one of my favorite analogy’s for reasonable doubt. Where was there not reasonable doubt in Karen Read’s case? I’m beyond eager to hear any of the jurors from her trial explain this. Anyone have any ideas? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenRead #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

236,339 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

“Affordability is the best it’s ever been in over a decade…” ~ Mark Carney It’s so affordable that a record amount of Canadians have filed for bankruptcy in the first 3 months of this year. Carney is not doing the one thing he was voted in for and Canadians are suffering for it. He refuses to talk to Trump. His life will be ok without a deal though.

“Affordability is the best it’s ever been in over a decade…” ~ Mark Carney It’s so affordable that a record amount of Canadians have filed for bankruptcy in the first 3 months of this year. Carney is not doing the one thing he was voted in for and Canadians are suffering for it. He refuses to talk to Trump. His life will be ok without a deal though.

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

27,572 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

JUST IN: Epstein survivor says she was shocked and upset when she heard Trump call the Epstein case a “hoax,” says she couldn’t believe he called it that. “For me personally, it was shocking and upsetting.” “I just I couldn't believe that he said that. For so many years, he acknowledged that there were thousands of files, and he was going to release them.” “And so hearing that today, I was just confused by it. I think he thought that we were targeting him, and we weren't.” “I don't believe there's any evidence that he abused any of the survivors. So it wasn't a target against him. It was just a cry for us being fed up and wanting answers.”

JUST IN: Epstein survivor says she was shocked and upset when she heard Trump call the Epstein case a “hoax,” says she couldn’t believe he called it that. “For me personally, it was shocking and upsetting.” “I just I couldn't believe that he said that. For so many years, he acknowledged that there were thousands of files, and he was going to release them.” “And so hearing that today, I was just confused by it. I think he thought that we were targeting him, and we weren't.” “I don't believe there's any evidence that he abused any of the survivors. So it wasn't a target against him. It was just a cry for us being fed up and wanting answers.”

Collin Rugg

260,195 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

President Biden: The American principle that no one is above the law was reaffirmed. Donald Trump was given every opportunity to defend himself. It was a state case, not a federal case. And it was heard by a jury of 12 citizens. 12 Americans, 12 people like you. Like millions of Americans who served on juries, this jury is chosen the same way every jury in America is chosen. It was a process that Donald Trump's attorney was part of. The jury heard five weeks of evidence. After careful deliberation, the jury reached a unanimous verdict. They found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts. Now he’ll be given the opportunity as he should to appeal that decision just like everyone else has that opportunity. That's how the American system of justice works. And it's reckless, it's dangerous, and it's irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict. Our justice system has endured for nearly 250 years and it literally is the cornerstone of America. The justice system should be respected, and we should never allow anyone to tear it down. That's America. That's who we are. And that's who we will always be, God willing

President Biden: The American principle that no one is above the law was reaffirmed. Donald Trump was given every opportunity to defend himself. It was a state case, not a federal case. And it was heard by a jury of 12 citizens. 12 Americans, 12 people like you. Like millions of Americans who served on juries, this jury is chosen the same way every jury in America is chosen. It was a process that Donald Trump's attorney was part of. The jury heard five weeks of evidence. After careful deliberation, the jury reached a unanimous verdict. They found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts. Now he’ll be given the opportunity as he should to appeal that decision just like everyone else has that opportunity. That's how the American system of justice works. And it's reckless, it's dangerous, and it's irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict. Our justice system has endured for nearly 250 years and it literally is the cornerstone of America. The justice system should be respected, and we should never allow anyone to tear it down. That's America. That's who we are. And that's who we will always be, God willing

Headquarters

1,286,959 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🚨 JUST IN: Deputy AG Todd Blanche confirms Don Lemon does NOT have a "get out of jail free card" allowing him to storm a church with leftists because he claims to be a "journalist" Bring charges against him! "No, the freedom of the press extends to a lot of different areas. It does NOT extend to somebody just trespassing and being embedded with a group of rioters and being part of the group that storms inside of a church!" "So, as our assistant attorney general said yesterday, we are absolutely investigating that conduct. And the fact that that man, that Mr. Lemon, thought that that was a good idea to do that, and then to race away from it, saying it was freedom of the press. Well, we'll see!"

🚨 JUST IN: Deputy AG Todd Blanche confirms Don Lemon does NOT have a "get out of jail free card" allowing him to storm a church with leftists because he claims to be a "journalist" Bring charges against him! "No, the freedom of the press extends to a lot of different areas. It does NOT extend to somebody just trespassing and being embedded with a group of rioters and being part of the group that storms inside of a church!" "So, as our assistant attorney general said yesterday, we are absolutely investigating that conduct. And the fact that that man, that Mr. Lemon, thought that that was a good idea to do that, and then to race away from it, saying it was freedom of the press. Well, we'll see!"

Eric Daugherty

24,910 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨 BREAKING: In a bombshell revelation, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino announces there were "multiple warning signs" ahead of Tyler Robinson's assassination of Charlie Kirk - and evidence suggests people might've KNOWN IN ADVANCE Charlie would be his target. "There were people in his network, friends and family, who had stated that he had become more political, that he had become, at some parts, I believe some of his coworkers had stated that he had kind of detached himself when the topic of politics came up and walked away from them." "Family members said he'd become more political, leading us to believe that this ideology had infected him and had taken over and he was just intent, it appears, from the data we've accumulated and the channel and that note, which we have some evidence may have existed before based on the communications in that channel, that his target was obviously going to be Charlie and that people knew in advance."

🚨 BREAKING: In a bombshell revelation, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino announces there were "multiple warning signs" ahead of Tyler Robinson's assassination of Charlie Kirk - and evidence suggests people might've KNOWN IN ADVANCE Charlie would be his target. "There were people in his network, friends and family, who had stated that he had become more political, that he had become, at some parts, I believe some of his coworkers had stated that he had kind of detached himself when the topic of politics came up and walked away from them." "Family members said he'd become more political, leading us to believe that this ideology had infected him and had taken over and he was just intent, it appears, from the data we've accumulated and the channel and that note, which we have some evidence may have existed before based on the communications in that channel, that his target was obviously going to be Charlie and that people knew in advance."

Eric Daugherty

457,894 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Poilievre accuses Carney of being a political grifter. "It's crony capitalism... let's just unpack what Mr. Carney did in this particular case. He used his political power to convince the British gov't to require more expensive jet fuel for air travel. And then, his company invested $1 billion in the company that was selling that jet fuel." WATCH:

Poilievre accuses Carney of being a political grifter. "It's crony capitalism... let's just unpack what Mr. Carney did in this particular case. He used his political power to convince the British gov't to require more expensive jet fuel for air travel. And then, his company invested $1 billion in the company that was selling that jet fuel." WATCH:

Bret 🍁

32,339 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce