Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
No Name, No Case 👊💥🔥 This is Jevon Martinez and he may have cracked the code. This is the simplest yet most effective way to prevent the court from acquiring jurisdiction. Listen to how he did it and why it worked.
171,837 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)
43 Kommentare

That's an old 3 Stooges trick

😂

lol people believe some real bullshit.

I know. They believe stupid things like their rights come government, when obviously the Declaration of Independence tells us that our right come from God and we created government as a servant to aid in securing that which we already had. They believe stupid things like the government has arbitrary authority over them when no crime has been committed and can invade their fundamental right to privacy and autonomy over their property. People like you believe some horribly moronic things.

@melvinthecat5 Okay great. So do you support actual criminals that have harmed people not being held to account? You think anyone should be able to just bamboozle their way out of being held responsible?

@BurnTheCorpFic @melvinthecat5 Harming another is not the same thing as enacting your right. That's the difference between a woman having the abortion VS a man forcing himself on her. One has a victim the other doesn't. Same thing here . One has a victim .

@Simmulator117 @BurnTheCorpFic You’re making distinctions that isn’t reality. Instead of cameras let’s say it was traffic lights ,fire hydrants or playgrounds. Who’s the victim? He also wasn’t enacting his rights he was spouting nonsense

@Simmulator117 @BurnTheCorpFic Extenuating circumstances is a legal way of saying laws can be broken or changed based on the moment of action. Implying that laws are man made and are fickle and not to be confused with natural law. You're confusing the two .

@Simmulator117 @BurnTheCorpFic Natural law doesn’t exist. All laws are man made. Idk even what your argument is

Have you heard of K.L.? He was a featured guest on a couple of Crrow777radio shows speaking about legalese and the corporate fiction. Incredibly fascinating info. You just have to study hard and truly understand & be ready, because they will try & make your life hell

I know exactly what they are doing, how they are doing it, and how to beat it. One of my students got a traffic ticket dismissed last week.

Hero

Agreed.

Fucking brilliant

Absolutely!

Show all your court documents to prove your claims…with the case number visible so people can go look if they want to.

Narrator: "The whole thing did not, in fact, get dismissed." This guy is so dumb he doesn't even know the difference between "showing up" and "making an appearance." Sovcits are the second dumbest cult next to flat earthers.

1000%. It's part of the plan to take away your rights and get you to accept that we have to resist

Keep in mind there has to be at least three or more others who signed affidavits. Most judges don't know this and why its sends them into a tail spin and pisses them off mostly due to embarrassment.

@777Jessejames

Yep in the Bill of Rights you have to give consent to be governed you also can say no when read your rights not no you don't understand no you don't accept their ruling authority or so they say I just mind my own and follow the law but we are in a 1930's Germany time loop all a sudden

This is obviously engagement farming. This isn't legal. They can compel him to give fingerprints or other means to verify identity. He'll be in jail soon, unfortunately. I agree with cutting down the cameras but this won't work

Does refusing to give your name in court work to defeat jurisdiction?No. This does not "crack the code" or prevent a court from acquiring or exercising jurisdiction. Here's why:Courts establish identity independently. Once someone is properly before the court (via arrest on a warrant, summons, or physical presence in the courtroom), the court has jurisdiction over the person. Identity is proven through fingerprints, photos, witness identification, case documents, prior records, or even the judge/officers recognizing the individual—not solely by the defendant verbally stating their name.

This is a lie I’ve seen sovereign citizens try this shit in court and when they’re called by name, they say I’m here on that matter your honor and they get nowhere and they’re fucked. This is a wet dream. Don’t buy it.

You know what this sovereign citizen crap gets you... The judge decides that since the named person being accused hasn't identified themselves... bench warrant for their arrest.... next case

Oh snap! A sovereign citizen poster. I have to credit you guys with being Candace Owens level nutso before it was cool.

And there you have it... ALL LIES! i've watched countless people try to use this defense in court.And it never works.

Please stop with this nonsense. Learn the law properly. This is utter crap.

Why do you keep saying security guard. Courts don't have security, they have law enforcement, usually deputies...

Doing a little research on the Net indicates that arrest warrants were issued. This tactic apparently didn't work. If I'm wrong please provide a link to show otherwise.

You can tell jews came up with this

Brilliant. Another #DeFlock patriot

Shit that never happened.

GET THE FLOCK OUTTA HERE 🤬

This doesn't work, knock it off, they'll hold you until you give your name, or they'll bring in somebody you know to identify you. That's how easy it is. But they won't let you out of jail unless you let them process you. FAFO if you have nothing better to do and no job to lose.

Amazing way to piss off the judge and get the maximum penalty

No Jurisdiction.

So stupid. Not how it works. Total lie

It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out. Grok claims case was not dismissed but the warrant has not been issued yet either.

This is sovereign citizen buffoonery at it's finest.

Retarded

@JustManBeHad So…all that just to get a warrant for his arrest.

If you people are truly sovereign (and sober) then why do you show up to court?
