Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

'No one has convinced me why Ghana needs a five-year presidential term. Until then, I will not support it...What we should be discussing is efficiency, not extending presidential terms'. — Inusah Fuseini, former Tamale Central MP on the proposed constitutional amendments. Watch here: #PointOfView #ChannelOneTV #CitiFM #InusahFuseini #ConstitutionalAmendments

CITI FM 97.3

1,730,964 subscribers

39,958 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

I maintain that Kenya’s next General Election must be held in August 2026, not 2027. Article 136(2)(a) of the Constitution is explicit: a presidential election shall be held on the second Tuesday in August in every fifth year. The Constitution does not say after five years. It says in the fifth year. A term that runs beyond August 2026 spills into a sixth year, which the Constitution does not permit. Constitutional timelines are not elastic, and political convenience cannot override clear constitutional text. If we respect the supremacy of the Constitution, then elections must be held in August 2026.

I maintain that Kenya’s next General Election must be held in August 2026, not 2027. Article 136(2)(a) of the Constitution is explicit: a presidential election shall be held on the second Tuesday in August in every fifth year. The Constitution does not say after five years. It says in the fifth year. A term that runs beyond August 2026 spills into a sixth year, which the Constitution does not permit. Constitutional timelines are not elastic, and political convenience cannot override clear constitutional text. If we respect the supremacy of the Constitution, then elections must be held in August 2026.

Willis Evans Otieno

18,270 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

"When it rains, it pours": Zimbabwe's🇿🇼 President Emmerson Mnangagwa, who is 83 years old, was expected to step down after serving two five-year terms, but has now rallied his cabinet to adopt proposed constitutional amendments that lengthens presidential terms from five years to seven. When approved by parliament, Mnangagwa will be in office until 2030. The proposed changes by his cabinet on Tuesday also take power from the people. No direct popular vote. Zimbabweans will no longer vote for a president; instead, parliament will elect the president. Both the President and Parliament will serve a term of seven years. Mnangagwa's ZANU-PF party has been in power since independence, and holds a supermajority in both Houses of Parliament. This makes it even easier to amend the constitution. He assumed power following a military coup that removed longtime leader Robert Mugabe in 2017.

"When it rains, it pours": Zimbabwe's🇿🇼 President Emmerson Mnangagwa, who is 83 years old, was expected to step down after serving two five-year terms, but has now rallied his cabinet to adopt proposed constitutional amendments that lengthens presidential terms from five years to seven. When approved by parliament, Mnangagwa will be in office until 2030. The proposed changes by his cabinet on Tuesday also take power from the people. No direct popular vote. Zimbabweans will no longer vote for a president; instead, parliament will elect the president. Both the President and Parliament will serve a term of seven years. Mnangagwa's ZANU-PF party has been in power since independence, and holds a supermajority in both Houses of Parliament. This makes it even easier to amend the constitution. He assumed power following a military coup that removed longtime leader Robert Mugabe in 2017.

Kennedy Wandera

44,992 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🇿🇼 “Zimbabwe’s democracy has breathed its last” Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa signed into law constitutional amendments extending his presidency to 2030, government spokesperson Nick Mangwana confirmed Tuesday. The changes extend presidential and parliamentary terms from five to seven years, postpone elections scheduled for 2028, and abolish the direct popular vote for president, replacing it with selection by a parliament dominated by the ruling Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF). Critics have described the move as a constitutional coup. Opposition lawyer Doug Coltart warned lawmakers “could continually renew their own mandate without ever returning to the electorate,” while former MP Fadzayi Mahere wrote that Zimbabwe’s democracy “has breathed its last.” Legal experts argue the constitution’s no-benefit clause bars amendments extending a sitting president’s tenure without a referendum. 🎥 Mnangagwa, 83, took power after the 2017 military coup that ousted Robert Mugabe. In 2018, he pledged: “If I am elected for a second term, I will do my second term. But I will not go beyond that.”

🇿🇼 “Zimbabwe’s democracy has breathed its last” Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa signed into law constitutional amendments extending his presidency to 2030, government spokesperson Nick Mangwana confirmed Tuesday. The changes extend presidential and parliamentary terms from five to seven years, postpone elections scheduled for 2028, and abolish the direct popular vote for president, replacing it with selection by a parliament dominated by the ruling Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF). Critics have described the move as a constitutional coup. Opposition lawyer Doug Coltart warned lawmakers “could continually renew their own mandate without ever returning to the electorate,” while former MP Fadzayi Mahere wrote that Zimbabwe’s democracy “has breathed its last.” Legal experts argue the constitution’s no-benefit clause bars amendments extending a sitting president’s tenure without a referendum. 🎥 Mnangagwa, 83, took power after the 2017 military coup that ousted Robert Mugabe. In 2018, he pledged: “If I am elected for a second term, I will do my second term. But I will not go beyond that.”

Drop Site

50,985 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"There will be a third term. I did say that. I was not hallucinating; I was totally of sound mind when I made those statements, and I accidentally went further to say I was willing to bet on it. I'm not the person writing the script. Opeyemi Bamidele has said they were amending the constitution to introduce a single six-year presidential term. When will it be done? After the next election. The only question that will then arise is: can President Tinubu be entitled to benefit?" — Chidi Anselm Odinkalu, CGoF

"There will be a third term. I did say that. I was not hallucinating; I was totally of sound mind when I made those statements, and I accidentally went further to say I was willing to bet on it. I'm not the person writing the script. Opeyemi Bamidele has said they were amending the constitution to introduce a single six-year presidential term. When will it be done? After the next election. The only question that will then arise is: can President Tinubu be entitled to benefit?" — Chidi Anselm Odinkalu, CGoF

TheCable

40,437 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

President William Ruto dismisses claims of a one-term presidency: “Sometimes you are threatened with talk of a one-term presidency, two-term but that is not my concern. Will the 2027 election be any different from the ones we have held before? What is the problem?” “I was an MP for 15 years, Deputy President for 10 years, and now I am serving as President for almost five years now. What is it that I have not become? What can someone threaten me with?”

President William Ruto dismisses claims of a one-term presidency: “Sometimes you are threatened with talk of a one-term presidency, two-term but that is not my concern. Will the 2027 election be any different from the ones we have held before? What is the problem?” “I was an MP for 15 years, Deputy President for 10 years, and now I am serving as President for almost five years now. What is it that I have not become? What can someone threaten me with?”

Cyprian, Is Nyakundi

76,366 просмотров • 1 год назад

Yes Rigathi Gachagua will be ELIGIBLE TO VIE until the ENTIRE APPEAL PIPELINE is Exhausted. Is Article 99(3) a Goof thing? I do not know. Maybe it is one of the areas that we should think through in Broader Discourses on Constitutional Reform.

Yes Rigathi Gachagua will be ELIGIBLE TO VIE until the ENTIRE APPEAL PIPELINE is Exhausted. Is Article 99(3) a Goof thing? I do not know. Maybe it is one of the areas that we should think through in Broader Discourses on Constitutional Reform.

Ndong@Conslaw

15,157 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Serbian President Vucic: I did not come here to lie. You want me to say that we will be part of the EU in 2028, but we will not. It will all be over, we will see each other in four years, and what should I tell you? It will not happen. I do not deceive my people. I will not lie to anyone. You will ask me whether the Ukrainians will win. Let's say I say "yes". But will it really happen? I doubt it. And no one is talking about it openly. I have my own brains, I say what I think. We are on the way to the EU. We traditionally have excellent relations with Russia, we do not hide it, I am not ashamed of it. It has always been like this between the Serbs and the Russians. And we are the only country in Europe that has not imposed any sanctions against Russia. I say this openly, I am not afraid.

Serbian President Vucic: I did not come here to lie. You want me to say that we will be part of the EU in 2028, but we will not. It will all be over, we will see each other in four years, and what should I tell you? It will not happen. I do not deceive my people. I will not lie to anyone. You will ask me whether the Ukrainians will win. Let's say I say "yes". But will it really happen? I doubt it. And no one is talking about it openly. I have my own brains, I say what I think. We are on the way to the EU. We traditionally have excellent relations with Russia, we do not hide it, I am not ashamed of it. It has always been like this between the Serbs and the Russians. And we are the only country in Europe that has not imposed any sanctions against Russia. I say this openly, I am not afraid.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

350,541 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Jimi Wanjigi: I am not for two term, give me a break, why would I be for two term. Two term then what, one term then what? The issue is then what? In 2002, we had a moment similar to what we are going through, when everybody was saying Moi must go. Kibaki had a then what, and there were two anchors to his campaign: free primary education and a new constitution. When you say one term, then what? Tell me what you hear after that. After William Ruto goes, how will people’s lives change? #CitizenSundayLive

Jimi Wanjigi: I am not for two term, give me a break, why would I be for two term. Two term then what, one term then what? The issue is then what? In 2002, we had a moment similar to what we are going through, when everybody was saying Moi must go. Kibaki had a then what, and there were two anchors to his campaign: free primary education and a new constitution. When you say one term, then what? Tell me what you hear after that. After William Ruto goes, how will people’s lives change? #CitizenSundayLive

Citizen TV Kenya

54,271 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

#WATCH | A voter, Mader Mollah, says, "... A proper road should be constructed here. There is no primary health care centre here, which should come up. There is no high school here either, so a school should be built. We hope that harmony prevails here. If the leaders do something about it, I will be happy. I do not like what is happening right now. I do not like what Humayun Kabir and Suvendu Adhikari are saying..."

#WATCH | A voter, Mader Mollah, says, "... A proper road should be constructed here. There is no primary health care centre here, which should come up. There is no high school here either, so a school should be built. We hope that harmony prevails here. If the leaders do something about it, I will be happy. I do not like what is happening right now. I do not like what Humayun Kabir and Suvendu Adhikari are saying..."

ANI

55,575 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

I will repost this video until there's no longer a need for it. Zimbabwe needs a National Sex Offender Registration list ⚠️ We can not continue to be complicit with the rampant rape culture that is so pervasive in our nation. A 13 year old should NOT be a mother #263birthstories

I will repost this video until there's no longer a need for it. Zimbabwe needs a National Sex Offender Registration list ⚠️ We can not continue to be complicit with the rampant rape culture that is so pervasive in our nation. A 13 year old should NOT be a mother #263birthstories

Chipo Tsitsi Mlambo 🇿🇼 🇨🇦

40,217 просмотров • 1 год назад

Rigathi Gachagua: I have no other responsibility from today, it is to make sure that we have one single presidential candidate against President William Ruto. In the meantime, after this weekend, when I go to Western, you will not see me again in political mobilization. We are moving into the phase of strategy to identify one single presidential candidate, and then after that is done, we start the work of political mobilization

Rigathi Gachagua: I have no other responsibility from today, it is to make sure that we have one single presidential candidate against President William Ruto. In the meantime, after this weekend, when I go to Western, you will not see me again in political mobilization. We are moving into the phase of strategy to identify one single presidential candidate, and then after that is done, we start the work of political mobilization

Citizen TV Kenya

37,855 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

#WATCH | On Waqf Act hearing in Supreme Court, AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi says, "We consider this Act unconstitutional. The Court has said that the Central Waqf Council and the State Waqf Council will not be constituted, and 'Waqf by user' cannot be deleted. During the deliberations of the JPC, I gave a report opposing all amendments proposed by the government, and during the debate on the bill, I called the bill unconstitutional. Our legal battle against this Act will continue."

#WATCH | On Waqf Act hearing in Supreme Court, AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi says, "We consider this Act unconstitutional. The Court has said that the Central Waqf Council and the State Waqf Council will not be constituted, and 'Waqf by user' cannot be deleted. During the deliberations of the JPC, I gave a report opposing all amendments proposed by the government, and during the debate on the bill, I called the bill unconstitutional. Our legal battle against this Act will continue."

ANI

97,471 просмотров • 1 год назад

Question: Should the Democratic presidential candidate reevaluate military aid to Israel? AOC: This isn't just about a presidential election. The US has an obligation to uphold its own laws. Unconditional aid, no matter what one does, does not make sense. I think it enabled a genocide in Gaza, and I think that we have thousands of women and children dead that was completely avoidable.

Question: Should the Democratic presidential candidate reevaluate military aid to Israel? AOC: This isn't just about a presidential election. The US has an obligation to uphold its own laws. Unconditional aid, no matter what one does, does not make sense. I think it enabled a genocide in Gaza, and I think that we have thousands of women and children dead that was completely avoidable.

Acyn

686,876 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi: On media reports that the central government is likely to bring a bill to curb the powers of the Waqf Board over assets, Former Vice Chairman Of National Commission For Minorities Atif Rasheed says, "The Waqf Act was formed in 1954. The then government in 1995 changed it completely. In 2013, a lot of amendments were made to the act. So, now if an amendment is taking place, it does not need to be taken negatively. We should trust the government, it is dedicated to 'Sabka Sath, Sabka Vikas'... As per the reports, it seems that there are going to be around 32 amendments in the act. If it is about registration with the Collector or a judicial inquiry, then why should one have a problem with it? In 2013, it was amended that the government should map it every 10 years... This is not an interference in the Shariat and it does not decrease the power of the Waqf..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On media reports that the central government is likely to bring a bill to curb the powers of the Waqf Board over assets, Former Vice Chairman Of National Commission For Minorities Atif Rasheed says, "The Waqf Act was formed in 1954. The then government in 1995 changed it completely. In 2013, a lot of amendments were made to the act. So, now if an amendment is taking place, it does not need to be taken negatively. We should trust the government, it is dedicated to 'Sabka Sath, Sabka Vikas'... As per the reports, it seems that there are going to be around 32 amendments in the act. If it is about registration with the Collector or a judicial inquiry, then why should one have a problem with it? In 2013, it was amended that the government should map it every 10 years... This is not an interference in the Shariat and it does not decrease the power of the Waqf..."

ANI

14,687 просмотров • 2 лет назад

As EU vote approaches on U.S. trade deal, EU MP Brando Benifei tells me: “I want to be very clear: threats coming from the other side of the Atlantic will not help Europe, but also will not help US interests. We need to be on good terms for our economy to work well together. We should stop hearing threats one time on Spain, one time on Greenland, one time on France. This is not useful for the American economy.”

As EU vote approaches on U.S. trade deal, EU MP Brando Benifei tells me: “I want to be very clear: threats coming from the other side of the Atlantic will not help Europe, but also will not help US interests. We need to be on good terms for our economy to work well together. We should stop hearing threats one time on Spain, one time on Greenland, one time on France. This is not useful for the American economy.”

Jim Sciutto

18,914 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

I have listened to the debate on Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 between legal scholar Dr Justice Mavedzenge and political scientist Prof Jonathan Moyo today on Twitter. Without any doubt, Dr Justice Mavedzenge explained, clarified, and made ordinary people understand the issues, and more importantly, in my humble view, he won the debate on whether there is need for Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 to be subjected to a referendum or not. Anything done for the people, as Prof Jonathan Moyo says these monumental amendments are, should be subjected to the people. The Constitution is not ambiguous on this. It is clear that term limits should be subjected to a referendum for any change to be done legally. Under Section 328 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, any amendment that seeks to extend the length of time a President may hold office, or to remove or alter term limits in a way that benefits an incumbent, cannot apply to the sitting President and must be subjected to constitutional safeguards. You cannot claim to be doing something for the people and yet deny those same people the right to have a say. Prof Jonathan Moyo has a right to his views, but those views must be subjected to the law for the amendments to be implemented legally, and based on what I have read in our Constitution, his views are not aligned with the law. And I am not making this up. It is in the Constitution. Even veteran Zimbabwean lawyer and former ZANUPF legal secretary, Patrick Chinamasa, has said so. In this video, he explains in front of President Mnangagwa that what they are attempting to do today, which Prof Jonathan Moyo argues does not require a referendum, would in fact require two referendums. One to remove or alter presidential term limits from five to seven years, and another to extend the sitting president’s tenure to 2030. This position was declared, and not contradicted, at a ZANUPF conference in Bulawayo. What the broader legal fraternity in Zimbabwe is saying, save for a few lawyers who have since revised their positions and now echo the same view, is that the Constitution is explicit on these prescripts. Anything else is political propaganda to win hearts and minds. The problem with propaganda is that it cannot be anchored in constitutional provisions. It rests on opinion. In this instance, however, we are not expressing opinions. We are stating what is contained in the Constitution and what ZANUPF itself has previously acknowledged. You can decide today that you want a 20-year presidential term. That is your right to hold that view, but you must subject that proposition to the law. If you believe in it, take it to the citizens in the manner prescribed by the Constitution. You cannot decide, through opinion or political argument, whether a referendum is required or not. That question is not settled by what anyone thinks. It is settled by what the law says. If the Constitution requires a referendum, then you must subject yourself to it. That is how constitutional democracy works. We know that the judiciary in Zimbabwe is captured. We know how they are going to rule, but the whole world knows the truth, that if they rule in favour of these amendments going ahead without a referendum, they are simply a captured judiciary without the respect that is required for anyone holding such an important office, and history will remember them as such.

I have listened to the debate on Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 between legal scholar Dr Justice Mavedzenge and political scientist Prof Jonathan Moyo today on Twitter. Without any doubt, Dr Justice Mavedzenge explained, clarified, and made ordinary people understand the issues, and more importantly, in my humble view, he won the debate on whether there is need for Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 to be subjected to a referendum or not. Anything done for the people, as Prof Jonathan Moyo says these monumental amendments are, should be subjected to the people. The Constitution is not ambiguous on this. It is clear that term limits should be subjected to a referendum for any change to be done legally. Under Section 328 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, any amendment that seeks to extend the length of time a President may hold office, or to remove or alter term limits in a way that benefits an incumbent, cannot apply to the sitting President and must be subjected to constitutional safeguards. You cannot claim to be doing something for the people and yet deny those same people the right to have a say. Prof Jonathan Moyo has a right to his views, but those views must be subjected to the law for the amendments to be implemented legally, and based on what I have read in our Constitution, his views are not aligned with the law. And I am not making this up. It is in the Constitution. Even veteran Zimbabwean lawyer and former ZANUPF legal secretary, Patrick Chinamasa, has said so. In this video, he explains in front of President Mnangagwa that what they are attempting to do today, which Prof Jonathan Moyo argues does not require a referendum, would in fact require two referendums. One to remove or alter presidential term limits from five to seven years, and another to extend the sitting president’s tenure to 2030. This position was declared, and not contradicted, at a ZANUPF conference in Bulawayo. What the broader legal fraternity in Zimbabwe is saying, save for a few lawyers who have since revised their positions and now echo the same view, is that the Constitution is explicit on these prescripts. Anything else is political propaganda to win hearts and minds. The problem with propaganda is that it cannot be anchored in constitutional provisions. It rests on opinion. In this instance, however, we are not expressing opinions. We are stating what is contained in the Constitution and what ZANUPF itself has previously acknowledged. You can decide today that you want a 20-year presidential term. That is your right to hold that view, but you must subject that proposition to the law. If you believe in it, take it to the citizens in the manner prescribed by the Constitution. You cannot decide, through opinion or political argument, whether a referendum is required or not. That question is not settled by what anyone thinks. It is settled by what the law says. If the Constitution requires a referendum, then you must subject yourself to it. That is how constitutional democracy works. We know that the judiciary in Zimbabwe is captured. We know how they are going to rule, but the whole world knows the truth, that if they rule in favour of these amendments going ahead without a referendum, they are simply a captured judiciary without the respect that is required for anyone holding such an important office, and history will remember them as such.

Hopewell Chin’ono

62,456 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🔸Speaking to SABC News yesterday, it was important to highlight that the main reason Zimbabweans are opposed to the proposed constitutional amendments is the insidious attempt to re-introduce the Mugabe clauses. We enacted a new Constitution in 2013 to ensure that presidential terms are expressly limited so that no president can stay in power indefinitely. Fast forward to 2026, ZANU PF wants to take us back to a place where we have an imperial presidency who has vast power, is not voted for by the people and who has extensive control over the judiciary and other key levers of the State. This is not acceptable. #NoTo2030 We need new leaders.🇿🇼

🔸Speaking to SABC News yesterday, it was important to highlight that the main reason Zimbabweans are opposed to the proposed constitutional amendments is the insidious attempt to re-introduce the Mugabe clauses. We enacted a new Constitution in 2013 to ensure that presidential terms are expressly limited so that no president can stay in power indefinitely. Fast forward to 2026, ZANU PF wants to take us back to a place where we have an imperial presidency who has vast power, is not voted for by the people and who has extensive control over the judiciary and other key levers of the State. This is not acceptable. #NoTo2030 We need new leaders.🇿🇼

Fadzayi Mahere🇿🇼

42,202 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi | On the statement of Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra on Union Education Minister Pralhad Joshi, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "...I did not hear what was said. Since it has been expunged, I will not know exactly what was said. However, she is a very responsible person. I am sure that whatever she said is fully backed up. We will see what she said..."

#WATCH | Delhi | On the statement of Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra on Union Education Minister Pralhad Joshi, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "...I did not hear what was said. Since it has been expunged, I will not know exactly what was said. However, she is a very responsible person. I am sure that whatever she said is fully backed up. We will see what she said..."

ANI

52,866 просмотров • 1 месяц назад