正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Non-zero chance that Iran stopped signaling missile attacks and actually seriously targeted USAF fighter-jet assets in Jordan Not just depleting $4 million dollar Patriot PAC-3 stocks with 20-times cheaper missiles but hitting painful targets ➡️ Escalating disproportionally ?
140,054 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)
38 条评论
Two MaRV gliders made it through a salvo of 10 ($40 million) PAC-3 Two other MaRVs seem to have been intercepted (total 4)
Correction: Looks more like just one was intercepted Usually I try to stay conservative in favor of the underdog in such situations (U.S. in this case)
One can hope I’ve been kinda disappointed at their lack of focus on air bases throughout the war tbh
Iranians have the strategic patience that can only come from a millenary civilisation. I say this with no small degree of grudge because a side of me will never forgive them for having propped up Assad, but they are some smart fuckers.
How could it be disproportionate when your fight is existential? If I'm fighting for my survival, I'm going to break something of yours every time you strike me. Iran knows every minute of the fake ceasfire was a stalling tactic. The US have not given up on regime change goals.
Relative to the size of Iran’s and the United States’ economies, one PAC-3 interceptor costs the United States about 11 times less than a single ballistic missile costs Iran. Even if the U.S. spends $4 million on an interceptor and Iran spends $500,000 on a missile, the U.S. economy is roughly 80–90 times larger, making the financial burden far smaller for the United States.
What did the Iranian MP mean when he said Iran’s security belt will extend geographically as it did at Sea. Is Iran going to invade & take over Bahrain & Kuwait where most attacks are coming from?
The US is stupid reach. It is deep inside their positive cost/benefit frame. In other words this is a price they are willing to pay.
More an problem of sufficient quality technicians and engineers and some dynamics of intense capitalism
Sorry what?
@Pataramesh I think he's saying the US can't build these fast enough, even if the cost wasn't an issue
@IamZeev @Pataramesh No, he saying They US good n a lot engineers n technicians but Capitalism is issue Mil/Industry complex inflates the value of their products so high for so few weapons
@thesmoosh @Pataramesh They don’t have a clue about how free-market competition actually works.
@thesmoosh @Pataramesh US Military industrial complex is Techno feudalist in practice with Free market Veil. 1.5T is enough to buy n sustain 15X what they currently have. But it’s not only their fault they def not getting all that money but in fact stolen n shared among them
@thesmoosh @Pataramesh Can you give me a specific example of an advanced military aerospace product that is produced faster and cheaper outside a capitalist country maintaining the same quality and quantity?
No- if anything they’re still holding back ALOT. The savage Americans/Israelis attacked a water desalination plant. Now 20,000 Iranians are w/o water
I love the whole “disproportionate escalation “ narrative (not saying you). What is proportionate for having thousands of your civilians and regional civilians killed?
Americans tactics are stalling talks, while trying to degrade iranian mil assets in the northern coasts of Hormuz strait. why? because small conflict lessen the pressure internally in US.
When new video? is been long we see complete update and analysis.
When ever Mahdi Zarif and other Iranian officials spoiled brats got kicked out of US, their bank accounts were confiscated and their corrupt dads in Iran were rounded up and kicked out of decision making circles then missiles can work, till then it’s a show.
Why do you tards keep mentioning price like it fkn matters? The USA has 20 trillion dollar economy. We can afford a billion Patriot missiles. LOL
You mean Iran was signalling missile attacks until now? Find that hard to believe
No. Iran needs to send Americans and Israelis a message. STOP FUCKING AROUND!
Signaling restraint was the diplomatic cover. Dropping that cover with F-16 class assets in the crosshairs is a very different message
Time for cutting the tongue and the hand of the threatening crusaders.
I can't tell who's who.
The Iranians will stop any attack before the US market opens—they still don't know what the market is anyway. As the AI narrative gets dumped, the Iran peace talks are still working, so Trump will use the Iranians to fade the sell-offs.
Qasem bashir?
Would greatly appreciate another YouTube update 🙏
What do u mean stopped signalling ? Was Iran informing the US of attacks in June and the Ramadan war ?
Why don’t they have sleeper cells in countries that host bases? Wouldn’t that be easier than using missiles?
At this point why is Iran not bombing the air bases just before they take off to attack? What's the point of waiting?
Dear Patarames, Iran cannot match USA's warfare: USA has killed millions of iranians by hybrid warfare, over past decades Modern warfare cannot be considered only from the military perspective, as most deaths and suffering are caused by "soft" power:
Why not just utilize multiple cluster MRBM against these soft targets?
I see zero impact here. Very dissapointing.
Hi @grok what are inflation rates in Iran this days
Sounds like someone's trying to turn a budget meeting into a fireworks show, minus the fireworks.
Iran’s potential shift from signaling missile attacks to actual targeting demonstrates increased military assertiveness, raising concerns about regional stability and escalation.
![🇮🇷⚔️🇺🇸Iran or US: Who will win missile war or attrition? Russian military expert, historian of the Air Defense Forces Yuri Knutov explains: 💬 "If we look at the numbers being cited, Iran is said to have between 2,000 and 4,000 missiles. At a launch rate of around 100 or more per day, that would suggest roughly a month of sustained high-intensity missile attacks. As for THAAD interceptors, about 650 have been produced in total, with 150 used during a previous attack. That would leave roughly 400 remaining, possibly fewer. With careful and efficient use, that stock could last around 10 days — perhaps as little as five. If we’re talking about Patriot missiles, the US stockpile is larger, of course, but it can be depleted as well. Especially if they launch 10 missiles against a single Iranian ballistic missile, then they would have enough for three weeks, and that's with a very, very large margin. 👉 So Iran has a very important trump card right now. And if it uses its missiles correctly, saving its most technologically advanced ones, the hypersonic Fattahs, for the final stage—and the Fattahs are not intercepted at all by Israeli Arrow-3 missiles, nor by American THAAD and Patriot systems—then Iran essentially has a chance to land a very painful blow on Israel and the US. And in that way, essentially, to take revenge for the surprise attack carried out on Iran. [The US] produces around 55 interceptors per month, which is not enough to rapidly replenish heavy battlefield usage. New production facilities are under construction in Germany and Romania, but they are not yet operational. While some missiles could potentially be sourced from Arab states, yet Arab countries are using these missiles too. That’s why I say that given this intensity, this missile use can endure from two to three weeks, four weeks tops. But we don’t know the situation in Iran. It’s possible Iran has underground plants where ballistic missiles are produced as well."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2028438409924997354/amplify_video_thumb/2028437834600968192/img/hujwlV1H29AlzPP-.jpg)
