Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Not only does it appear, given his body language and answer, that Jack Smith is lying about taking any oath of office (a requirement as an officer of the court), but that Merrick Garland realized the problem and had Smith take an oath in September 2023. But Smith had... show more

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

909,771 subscribers

392,651 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

THE GOLDEN QUESTION WAS JUST ASKED! Lance Gooden just got Jack Smith to EXPOSE himself and Merrick Garland! Gooden: "It strikes me as odd that you don't remember who SWORE YOU IN, or how you were sworn in." Everyone knows that the appointment of Smith as Special Counsel wasn't LAWFUL, and Jack was just backed into a corner! Gooden "Attorney General Garland had you retake the oath of office...Why did he make you do that? " Smith tried to DENY knowing the "particulars" but Lance just blew open their BS for the ENTIRE WORLD to see! LOVE IT!

THE GOLDEN QUESTION WAS JUST ASKED! Lance Gooden just got Jack Smith to EXPOSE himself and Merrick Garland! Gooden: "It strikes me as odd that you don't remember who SWORE YOU IN, or how you were sworn in." Everyone knows that the appointment of Smith as Special Counsel wasn't LAWFUL, and Jack was just backed into a corner! Gooden "Attorney General Garland had you retake the oath of office...Why did he make you do that? " Smith tried to DENY knowing the "particulars" but Lance just blew open their BS for the ENTIRE WORLD to see! LOVE IT!

Gunther Eagleman™

539,555 views • 6 months ago

Remember, Jack Smith is NOT an independent counsel. He's a special counsel, answerable to AG Merrick Garland and ultimately to Joe Biden above him. Joe Biden made it clear that he wanted Jack Smith to prosecute Trump over J6. What do we have? Jack Smith prosecuting DOnald Trump over J6! This is not a DOJ investigation of a potential criminal. It is an American president prosecuting his chief political rival. Election interference!

Remember, Jack Smith is NOT an independent counsel. He's a special counsel, answerable to AG Merrick Garland and ultimately to Joe Biden above him. Joe Biden made it clear that he wanted Jack Smith to prosecute Trump over J6. What do we have? Jack Smith prosecuting DOnald Trump over J6! This is not a DOJ investigation of a potential criminal. It is an American president prosecuting his chief political rival. Election interference!

Charlie Kirk

578,773 views • 3 years ago

Yesterday Jack Smith said under oath to the House Judiciary Committee that he had evidence that proves without a doubt that Trump broke the law in his attempt to overthrow our free and fair election. Below is the full J6 indictment. An indictment by 12 grand jurors, not Biden.

Yesterday Jack Smith said under oath to the House Judiciary Committee that he had evidence that proves without a doubt that Trump broke the law in his attempt to overthrow our free and fair election. Below is the full J6 indictment. An indictment by 12 grand jurors, not Biden.

AnthonyAndrews

186,316 views • 7 months ago

Save and share the hell out of this clip. This destroys Jack Smith even being appointed as a Special Prosecutor, and Merrick Garland by proxy. There now remains a 0% chance Smith and his co-conspirators can lawfully move their case forward as the Special Counsel office was never lawfully established - and it turns out that's kind of impt. But don't take my word for it, Garland flat-out admits as much right here. Absolute destruction delivered masterfully by Congressman (R-KY) Thomas Massie Hat's of to you, Congressman. 🫡 h/t @Travis_4_Trump 👊

Save and share the hell out of this clip. This destroys Jack Smith even being appointed as a Special Prosecutor, and Merrick Garland by proxy. There now remains a 0% chance Smith and his co-conspirators can lawfully move their case forward as the Special Counsel office was never lawfully established - and it turns out that's kind of impt. But don't take my word for it, Garland flat-out admits as much right here. Absolute destruction delivered masterfully by Congressman (R-KY) Thomas Massie Hat's of to you, Congressman. 🫡 h/t @Travis_4_Trump 👊

AwakenedOutlaw⚒️

619,533 views • 2 years ago

🚨 WOW! A stunning revelation that Special Counsel Jack Smith SPIED ON the content of text messages of US Senators is resulting in calls for Smith to be prosecuted Smith surveilled over 40 LAWMAKERS, mostly GOP PERJURY! He likely LIED TO CONGRESS: Smith said "no," he didn't spy on text messages, but he DID "Some are now accusing Jack Smith of LYING UNDER OATH." Jack Smith is a dirty deep stater. Prosecute him NOW!

🚨 WOW! A stunning revelation that Special Counsel Jack Smith SPIED ON the content of text messages of US Senators is resulting in calls for Smith to be prosecuted Smith surveilled over 40 LAWMAKERS, mostly GOP PERJURY! He likely LIED TO CONGRESS: Smith said "no," he didn't spy on text messages, but he DID "Some are now accusing Jack Smith of LYING UNDER OATH." Jack Smith is a dirty deep stater. Prosecute him NOW!

Eric Daugherty

40,334 views • 17 days ago

More on Jack Smith. The individual Smith refers to here (and in his gag order motion) is Mark Milley, the treacherous former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the president's Truth Social post about his treasonous act of alerting China about potential moves by the president toward the end of Trump's term. Of course, Milley was never going to be a witness in any proceeding related to Smith's J6 indictment. But Smith used the president's (accurate) Sept 2023 Truth Social post about Milley as evidence the president needed to be placed under a gag order for "threatening potential witnesses." Tanya Chutkan only too happy to oblige.

More on Jack Smith. The individual Smith refers to here (and in his gag order motion) is Mark Milley, the treacherous former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the president's Truth Social post about his treasonous act of alerting China about potential moves by the president toward the end of Trump's term. Of course, Milley was never going to be a witness in any proceeding related to Smith's J6 indictment. But Smith used the president's (accurate) Sept 2023 Truth Social post about Milley as evidence the president needed to be placed under a gag order for "threatening potential witnesses." Tanya Chutkan only too happy to oblige.

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

133,946 views • 6 months ago

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he fears Americans now take the idea of “rule of law” for granted, and that its execution depends on "collective commitment." In a hearing focused on Smith’s investigations into President Donald Trump’s mishandling of classified documents and role in the Jan. 6 attack, Smith said as a public servant in international settings, he has “seen how the rule of law can erode,” adding that many Americans may now take it for granted in the U.S. “The rule of law is not self-executing. It depends on our collective commitment to apply it. It requires dedicated service on behalf of others, especially when that service is difficult and comes with costs,” Smith said. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He’s denied accusations of bias.

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he fears Americans now take the idea of “rule of law” for granted, and that its execution depends on "collective commitment." In a hearing focused on Smith’s investigations into President Donald Trump’s mishandling of classified documents and role in the Jan. 6 attack, Smith said as a public servant in international settings, he has “seen how the rule of law can erode,” adding that many Americans may now take it for granted in the U.S. “The rule of law is not self-executing. It depends on our collective commitment to apply it. It requires dedicated service on behalf of others, especially when that service is difficult and comes with costs,” Smith said. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He’s denied accusations of bias.

PBS News

18,557 views • 6 months ago

January, 2026. Jamie Raskin gives an opening statement during a hearing with Jack Smith and lets everyone know that Smith never obtained any content from the phone records subpoenaed. Under oath, Jack Smith confirms what Raskin had said. Neither was telling the truth.

January, 2026. Jamie Raskin gives an opening statement during a hearing with Jack Smith and lets everyone know that Smith never obtained any content from the phone records subpoenaed. Under oath, Jack Smith confirms what Raskin had said. Neither was telling the truth.

MAZE

154,467 views • 17 days ago

Special counsel Jack Smith urged Americans to read the federal indictment against former President Donald Trump that has been unsealed. “I invite everyone to read it in full to understand the scope and the gravity of the crimes charged," Smith said.

Special counsel Jack Smith urged Americans to read the federal indictment against former President Donald Trump that has been unsealed. “I invite everyone to read it in full to understand the scope and the gravity of the crimes charged," Smith said.

CNN

1,172,416 views • 3 years ago

A federal judge on Monday dismissed in its entirety the classified documents case against Donald Trump, ruling that the appointment of Jack Smith as the special counsel had violated the Constitution. Our reporter explains the ruling.

A federal judge on Monday dismissed in its entirety the classified documents case against Donald Trump, ruling that the appointment of Jack Smith as the special counsel had violated the Constitution. Our reporter explains the ruling.

The New York Times

114,648 views • 2 years ago

To Kevin McCarthy, Marge and everyone who keeps claiming that Special Counsel Jack Smith is somehow bias, you are either ignoring the facts or you are intentionally being disingenuous. - Jack Smith was appointed by Merrick Garland in November 2022 because Garland didn’t want the investigation into Trump to have any bias or appearance of bias. - In the past, Jack Smith literally oversaw the DOJ’s public integrity section, which investigated wrongdoing by politicians as well as election crimes. - Jack Smith has worked on the prosecution teams against both Republican and Democrat politicians in the past, including against Democrat former VP candidate John Edwards. - The entire Code of Federal Regulations says that a special counsel must have “a reputation for integrity and impartial decision making.” - Jack Smith is a registered Independent. - In the end, it will not be Jack Smith who determines Trump’s innocents or guilt. It will be an entire jury of his peers, and a verdict requires every single juror on the jury, which is selected by both Trump’s attorneys and the prosecution, to agree that Trump is either innocent or guilty. If any one juror believes differently from the others, there will be no verdict, and there will be a mistrial. - In the end, the facts will be what determines Trump’s innocents or guilt — not bias!

To Kevin McCarthy, Marge and everyone who keeps claiming that Special Counsel Jack Smith is somehow bias, you are either ignoring the facts or you are intentionally being disingenuous. - Jack Smith was appointed by Merrick Garland in November 2022 because Garland didn’t want the investigation into Trump to have any bias or appearance of bias. - In the past, Jack Smith literally oversaw the DOJ’s public integrity section, which investigated wrongdoing by politicians as well as election crimes. - Jack Smith has worked on the prosecution teams against both Republican and Democrat politicians in the past, including against Democrat former VP candidate John Edwards. - The entire Code of Federal Regulations says that a special counsel must have “a reputation for integrity and impartial decision making.” - Jack Smith is a registered Independent. - In the end, it will not be Jack Smith who determines Trump’s innocents or guilt. It will be an entire jury of his peers, and a verdict requires every single juror on the jury, which is selected by both Trump’s attorneys and the prosecution, to agree that Trump is either innocent or guilty. If any one juror believes differently from the others, there will be no verdict, and there will be a mistrial. - In the end, the facts will be what determines Trump’s innocents or guilt — not bias!

Ed Krassenstein

999,486 views • 3 years ago

Here it is: President Trump: “You can comeback, I voluntarily consent for you to search here.” King Solomon Reporting: RE: A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY: Not only did Jack Smith deliberately hide from the judge who signed off on the search warrant for the Mar-a-Lago raid that President Trump had given the FBI full consent to search Mar-a-Lago, but Jack Smith tampered with and planted evidence, lied to the court about it, and got caught. Documents obtained by America First Legal Stephen Miller through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) confirm: NARA was conspiring with the Department of Justice and the Biden White House to craft a criminal referral against Donald J. Trump as early as September 2021 — five months before the “official” referral by NARA to the DOJ in February 2022.

Here it is: President Trump: “You can comeback, I voluntarily consent for you to search here.” King Solomon Reporting: RE: A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY: Not only did Jack Smith deliberately hide from the judge who signed off on the search warrant for the Mar-a-Lago raid that President Trump had given the FBI full consent to search Mar-a-Lago, but Jack Smith tampered with and planted evidence, lied to the court about it, and got caught. Documents obtained by America First Legal Stephen Miller through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) confirm: NARA was conspiring with the Department of Justice and the Biden White House to craft a criminal referral against Donald J. Trump as early as September 2021 — five months before the “official” referral by NARA to the DOJ in February 2022.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

344,604 views • 6 months ago

This is what journalist Nick McKenzie had to say after Ben Roberts-Smith lost his landmark defamation case. Mr Roberts-Smith was not charged over any of the alleged conduct and no findings have been made against him in a criminal court. Read more:

This is what journalist Nick McKenzie had to say after Ben Roberts-Smith lost his landmark defamation case. Mr Roberts-Smith was not charged over any of the alleged conduct and no findings have been made against him in a criminal court. Read more:

SBS News

11,394 views • 3 years ago

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he stands by the decisions he made in that role, "including the decision to bring charges against President Trump." In a hearing focused on Smith's investigations into President Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents and role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Smith said his investigation developed proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump had engaged in criminal activity. "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or Republican," Smith said. "No one should be above the law in this country," he added. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He's denied accusations of bias.

Former special counsel Jack Smith told a House committee Thursday that he stands by the decisions he made in that role, "including the decision to bring charges against President Trump." In a hearing focused on Smith's investigations into President Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents and role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Smith said his investigation developed proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump had engaged in criminal activity. "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or Republican," Smith said. "No one should be above the law in this country," he added. The hearing is an opportunity for the career prosecutor to publicly offer his inside perspective on the investigations, which both led to unprecedented indictments. Both were scuttled once it was clear that Trump would return to the Oval Office; Department of Justice policy prevents prosecution of a sitting president. Republicans and the president have accused Smith of pursuing a politically motivated case against the president. Trump has denied wrongdoing while attacking Smith, calling him a "criminal" who ought to be investigated and "put in prison." Smith defended his investigations in an hourslong closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, saying he said he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" of what his investigations laid out. He's denied accusations of bias.

PBS News

13,485 views • 6 months ago

Jack Smith is a terrible attorney with a lot of failures in his career. Now, he’s abusing his power, the power of the special counsel, and the power of the Department of Injustice. I will not fund Jack Smith’s special counsel and I will use the Holman Rule to defund his office. President Trump is innocent and we must end the witch hunts!

Jack Smith is a terrible attorney with a lot of failures in his career. Now, he’s abusing his power, the power of the special counsel, and the power of the Department of Injustice. I will not fund Jack Smith’s special counsel and I will use the Holman Rule to defund his office. President Trump is innocent and we must end the witch hunts!

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

1,213,372 views • 3 years ago

Jack Smith testified under oath that he did not spy on Members of Congress and didn’t read their text messages. Bombshell new DOJ documents just revealed Smith and his team reviewed the communications of 44 Members of Congress. Lying to Congress Under Oath is called perjury and is a felony under 18 U.S. Code 1001 §§ 1621, which carries a punishment of up to five years in prison. Smith must be charged.

Jack Smith testified under oath that he did not spy on Members of Congress and didn’t read their text messages. Bombshell new DOJ documents just revealed Smith and his team reviewed the communications of 44 Members of Congress. Lying to Congress Under Oath is called perjury and is a felony under 18 U.S. Code 1001 §§ 1621, which carries a punishment of up to five years in prison. Smith must be charged.

Benny Johnson

227,470 views • 18 days ago

Even CNN is now turning on Jack Smith after his House Judiciary testimony. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig zeroed in on the moment Republicans cornered Smith over rushing the Trump case right before the 2024 election — and Smith had no answer. HONIG: “To your question, Brianna, the last Congressman we saw brought up the fact that jack Smith demanded a trial date four months out, five months out in a case involving 13 MILLION pages of documents.” “There is no defense lawyer in the country who can constitutionally prepare for trial and defend his client on that short of time frame.” “The implication was you were rushing to get this in before the 2024 election.” “Jack Smith did not defend himself, by the way. He didn’t say a word about that, which I found, I found striking.” “And Jack Smith has always maintained this veneer that he never thought about the election…of course he did!” “Why would would you demand such a quick trial date?”

Even CNN is now turning on Jack Smith after his House Judiciary testimony. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig zeroed in on the moment Republicans cornered Smith over rushing the Trump case right before the 2024 election — and Smith had no answer. HONIG: “To your question, Brianna, the last Congressman we saw brought up the fact that jack Smith demanded a trial date four months out, five months out in a case involving 13 MILLION pages of documents.” “There is no defense lawyer in the country who can constitutionally prepare for trial and defend his client on that short of time frame.” “The implication was you were rushing to get this in before the 2024 election.” “Jack Smith did not defend himself, by the way. He didn’t say a word about that, which I found, I found striking.” “And Jack Smith has always maintained this veneer that he never thought about the election…of course he did!” “Why would would you demand such a quick trial date?”

Overton

397,286 views • 6 months ago

🚨 Former Special Counsel Jack Smith, in a closed-door House Judiciary Committee hearing: “The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts.” “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power”

🚨 Former Special Counsel Jack Smith, in a closed-door House Judiciary Committee hearing: “The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts.” “Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power”

Republicans against Trump

185,834 views • 7 months ago

Special Counsel Jack Smith said former president Donald Trump tried to obstruct “a bedrock function of the U.S. government” — the certification of the presidential election results. Smith said the Department of Justice is committed to a speedy trial, and that the investigation of other individuals in the case continues.

Special Counsel Jack Smith said former president Donald Trump tried to obstruct “a bedrock function of the U.S. government” — the certification of the presidential election results. Smith said the Department of Justice is committed to a speedy trial, and that the investigation of other individuals in the case continues.

The Washington Post

1,391,713 views • 3 years ago

In a brief statement after Trump was indicted, special counsel Jack Smith described the US Capitol insurrection as an “unprecedented assault” that was “fueled by lies” from the former president. He encouraged Americans to read the indictment.

In a brief statement after Trump was indicted, special counsel Jack Smith described the US Capitol insurrection as an “unprecedented assault” that was “fueled by lies” from the former president. He encouraged Americans to read the indictment.

CNN

979,481 views • 3 years ago