Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Nothing better than having huge straight #musclemasters & #bodybuilders #facesitting and #farting in the #gayslaves face. Join now to watch full vids plus 1000 other vids of REAL men using, abusing and bullying the #gayslaves. #facesitting #farting #musclefarts #proteinfarts #menfarting #facesitfart #Kink #fetish #malefarts #masterslave #ukmaster #alphafart #bodybuilderfart #farts...

FartSub2's profile picture

stompcrush/sitcrush

20,070 subscribers

74,807 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#musclemasters#bodybuilders#facesitting#farting#gayslaves#gayslaves#facesitting#farting
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

If you still say “I have nothing to hide” in 2025, this 4-minute clip will ruin that sentence for you forever. Glenn Beck grilled Whitney Webb and she dropped pure dynamite: – Larry Ellison (the billionaire now personally advising Trump on ALL tech/AI policy) openly bragged to Oracle shareholders: “We’re recording & surveilling EVERYTHING — citizens will finally be on their best behavior.” – Predictive-policing algorithms (PredPol etc.) proven less accurate than a coin toss are still putting innocent people on house arrest for crimes they haven’t committed yet. – UK keeps using facial recognition that fails 91% of the time and refuses to change vendors — because the goal isn’t catching criminals, it’s creating permanent obedience. – Many of the “America First libertarian” tech voices now inside Trump’s circle sit on the Bilderberg steering committee and have called free markets “for losers” while building monopolies. Whitney’s ice-cold warning: “After the Left failed to sell the digital control grid, the same people are now rebranding it as right-wing common sense. ”Watch these 4:06 and try — just try — to keep saying “I have nothing to hide” with a straight face ever again. If this doesn’t wake you up, nothing will. Do you STILL think “nothing to hide = nothing to fear” when the richest men on earth are openly scripting your future behavior?
4:06

If you still say “I have nothing to hide” in 2025, this 4-minute clip will ruin that sentence for you forever. Glenn Beck grilled Whitney Webb and she dropped pure dynamite: – Larry Ellison (the billionaire now personally advising Trump on ALL tech/AI policy) openly bragged to Oracle shareholders: “We’re recording & surveilling EVERYTHING — citizens will finally be on their best behavior.” – Predictive-policing algorithms (PredPol etc.) proven less accurate than a coin toss are still putting innocent people on house arrest for crimes they haven’t committed yet. – UK keeps using facial recognition that fails 91% of the time and refuses to change vendors — because the goal isn’t catching criminals, it’s creating permanent obedience. – Many of the “America First libertarian” tech voices now inside Trump’s circle sit on the Bilderberg steering committee and have called free markets “for losers” while building monopolies. Whitney’s ice-cold warning: “After the Left failed to sell the digital control grid, the same people are now rebranding it as right-wing common sense. ”Watch these 4:06 and try — just try — to keep saying “I have nothing to hide” with a straight face ever again. If this doesn’t wake you up, nothing will. Do you STILL think “nothing to hide = nothing to fear” when the richest men on earth are openly scripting your future behavior?

Camus

430,499 views • 8 months ago

Here's the second beat I made on the Akai MPC Sample. Let me know what you think below. I've realized that this machine has forced me to get straight to the point and not procrastinate. I've realized that using a program like Ableton (where there is infinite hard drive space and capability), I often sample things with no intention of using them until later. And while having a hard drive full of samples feels good--nothing feels better than making a beat with a sample that you just found right there on the spot. I'm getting back to that now. So I've decided to keep the MPC Sample in my bedroom, on the desk that's right next to my bed. This is how I was making music from 1999-2005, but over the years I had forgotten how much of a difference it makes to keep your tools close to you. I'm still learning how to freak this machine, but will keep y'all posted on my progress with it. Thinking of putting some beatmaking videos on youtube. Would any of y'all be interested? WORD! #akaimpcsample #boombap #boombaphiphop #beatmaker
0:37

Here's the second beat I made on the Akai MPC Sample. Let me know what you think below. I've realized that this machine has forced me to get straight to the point and not procrastinate. I've realized that using a program like Ableton (where there is infinite hard drive space and capability), I often sample things with no intention of using them until later. And while having a hard drive full of samples feels good--nothing feels better than making a beat with a sample that you just found right there on the spot. I'm getting back to that now. So I've decided to keep the MPC Sample in my bedroom, on the desk that's right next to my bed. This is how I was making music from 1999-2005, but over the years I had forgotten how much of a difference it makes to keep your tools close to you. I'm still learning how to freak this machine, but will keep y'all posted on my progress with it. Thinking of putting some beatmaking videos on youtube. Would any of y'all be interested? WORD! #akaimpcsample #boombap #boombaphiphop #beatmaker

BLUEPRINT

19,032 views • 4 months ago

The ELITE have been MOCKING YOU right to YOUR FACE and TRAFFICKING CHILDREN for DECADES, and you never even NOTICED. This is how this Satanic group of elite child predators have been operating a global child trafficking operation right out in the open, through our own government, while opening front companies and NGOs and using them to steal your hard earned taxpayer dollars through these fronts and NGOs for themselves and to sell children all around the world. What makes this even worse is that most of these fronts, NGOs, and non-profits were set up and supposed to help children, like the Clinton Foundation, the Ratcliffe Foundation, or any one of Oprah's child foundations, etc., but, in fact, they all do the exact opposite and facilitate the trafficking and abuse of children to some of the most wealthy elite around the world. This is why the Epstein and the Diddy case are so important to the future of America and the rest of the world and to end child trafficking all together. Since 1996, the FBI logged on record, the first time "Pizza" has been used as a form of communication to signify child po*n, pedophil*a, or anything involving the sexual abuse of children. There are many other numerous symbols and words to specify the exact preferences of that particular person and what type of fetish and child that they are into. This is where the famous "PizzaGate" term stems from and the whole Comet Ping Pong incident with James Alefantis. Then come to find out that members of our own government at the time were using these same secret comms to communicate with each other including, The Podestas, Hillary Clinton, and even Barack Obama, who had a very strange email referring to $65,000 dollars worth of "Hot Dogs" which is also another preference word that signifies a child type and secret comm used that is well known. The fact is that the way these people operate and according to their occult practices and sick narcissistic ways, they have to and enjoy mocking you to your face while communicating with others at the same time. This is more than apparent through all types of media, music, cartoons, basically anything in the mainstream media. Just pay attention and you will see it everywhere. From Ellen at the 2014 Grammys handing out "Pizza," to the way her stage set for her now cancelled T.V. show, "Ellen," that resembled Epstein's island with the blue and white patterns like Epstein's temple and the palm trees was a 1 to 1 match of the horrific island of horrors. You can search almost any celebrity's social media, especially before many of them were called out, and you will see a strange amount of pictures and comments with children and pizza. The references to pizza and children is through the roof. Especially in the order and combination that they are using the words in. You literally have to be blind not to see that they are mocking you or communicating about sexually abusing children, or worse. Another reference that many do not talk about is the reference with Pizza representing children and the Pizza oven, which actually represents an alter to Baal or Moloch, which is a part of the Satanic ritualistic child sacrificial ceremonies that goes as far back as records show and are even included in the Bible. Archeologist are now finding more and more proof that child sexual abuse and child sacrifice has been going on for centuries and is linked to elite families and their ritual practices that formed societal classes throughout history with the elite abusing and sacrificing children to their gods, whether that be Baal, Moloch, or Lucifer himself. Now you see grooming and children being sexualized and even rap*d in their own schools. They are coming for your children and we need to stand up and stop it. Enough talking about it, it's time to act before we let this continue any longer. We need to actually start doing more to protect these kids. One question I will leave you with to ask yourself is, now that we know that they are definitely abusing and trafficking children, especially since RFK Jr. just confirmed that even the Biden/Harris Administration and their own HHS was involved in the trafficking of children, it's not why would they use a secret language or code words to communicate, the real question is, "Why wouldn't they?" There are no coincidences.
6:07

Sensitive content

The ELITE have been MOCKING YOU right to YOUR FACE and TRAFFICKING CHILDREN for DECADES, and you never even NOTICED. This is how this Satanic group of elite child predators have been operating a global child trafficking operation right out in the open, through our own government, while opening front companies and NGOs and using them to steal your hard earned taxpayer dollars through these fronts and NGOs for themselves and to sell children all around the world. What makes this even worse is that most of these fronts, NGOs, and non-profits were set up and supposed to help children, like the Clinton Foundation, the Ratcliffe Foundation, or any one of Oprah's child foundations, etc., but, in fact, they all do the exact opposite and facilitate the trafficking and abuse of children to some of the most wealthy elite around the world. This is why the Epstein and the Diddy case are so important to the future of America and the rest of the world and to end child trafficking all together. Since 1996, the FBI logged on record, the first time "Pizza" has been used as a form of communication to signify child po*n, pedophil*a, or anything involving the sexual abuse of children. There are many other numerous symbols and words to specify the exact preferences of that particular person and what type of fetish and child that they are into. This is where the famous "PizzaGate" term stems from and the whole Comet Ping Pong incident with James Alefantis. Then come to find out that members of our own government at the time were using these same secret comms to communicate with each other including, The Podestas, Hillary Clinton, and even Barack Obama, who had a very strange email referring to $65,000 dollars worth of "Hot Dogs" which is also another preference word that signifies a child type and secret comm used that is well known. The fact is that the way these people operate and according to their occult practices and sick narcissistic ways, they have to and enjoy mocking you to your face while communicating with others at the same time. This is more than apparent through all types of media, music, cartoons, basically anything in the mainstream media. Just pay attention and you will see it everywhere. From Ellen at the 2014 Grammys handing out "Pizza," to the way her stage set for her now cancelled T.V. show, "Ellen," that resembled Epstein's island with the blue and white patterns like Epstein's temple and the palm trees was a 1 to 1 match of the horrific island of horrors. You can search almost any celebrity's social media, especially before many of them were called out, and you will see a strange amount of pictures and comments with children and pizza. The references to pizza and children is through the roof. Especially in the order and combination that they are using the words in. You literally have to be blind not to see that they are mocking you or communicating about sexually abusing children, or worse. Another reference that many do not talk about is the reference with Pizza representing children and the Pizza oven, which actually represents an alter to Baal or Moloch, which is a part of the Satanic ritualistic child sacrificial ceremonies that goes as far back as records show and are even included in the Bible. Archeologist are now finding more and more proof that child sexual abuse and child sacrifice has been going on for centuries and is linked to elite families and their ritual practices that formed societal classes throughout history with the elite abusing and sacrificing children to their gods, whether that be Baal, Moloch, or Lucifer himself. Now you see grooming and children being sexualized and even rap*d in their own schools. They are coming for your children and we need to stand up and stop it. Enough talking about it, it's time to act before we let this continue any longer. We need to actually start doing more to protect these kids. One question I will leave you with to ask yourself is, now that we know that they are definitely abusing and trafficking children, especially since RFK Jr. just confirmed that even the Biden/Harris Administration and their own HHS was involved in the trafficking of children, it's not why would they use a secret language or code words to communicate, the real question is, "Why wouldn't they?" There are no coincidences.

The SCIF

52,066 views • 1 year ago

Data has always been the bottleneck for physical AI in self driving and robotics. Tesla is taking two very different approaches for FSD and Optimus. Tesla’s Optimus Training Playbook: 1. Build 30k Optimus Gen 3 robots 2. Operate them in a mock environment where they can perform self-play “Optimus Academy” 3. Train in sim using the real robot data to close sim2real gap. Tesla FSD Training Playbook: 1. Sell millions of cars outfitted with cheap cameras 2. Collect diverse real world driving data (especially intervention and failure recovery data) for free as a byproduct of customers driving the cars. 3. Use driving data to train Autopilot/FSD and deploy policies incrementally as a supervised FSD product 4. Repeat until policy reaches robust unsupervised full self driving for robotaxi launch. The Tesla FSD playbook is a beautiful self-funding, customer subsidized, diverse real world data flywheel. The Optimus playbook is the opposite and shares none of the beautiful attributes of the FSD training flywheel that made FSD successful. The key differences: 1. Instead of having customers pay you for vehicles, Tesla will need to fund 30,000 Optimus robots. Assuming the current landed cost per unit is $100k, that will be $3B to build plus another ~30% per year for maintenance labor and spare parts given it’s still an unhardened pre-production prototype is another $900M per year. For reference, Tesla’s GAAP net income in 2025 was $3.8B. 2. Instead of having customers drive their Teslas on roads all across the world giving Tesla an insanely rich and diverse dataset that Waymo and other AV companies could never collect, the Optimus Academy is doing the equivalent of building a fake town in a parking lot and driving their car in that parking lot. No matter how real you try to make the environments for self-play you can never replicate the diversity, complexity and failure modes of the real world. Data collected in staged environments produces demo-grade policies and will not be rich enough to generalize to the vast diversity of environments, tasks, objects, etc. out of distribution. 3. Instead of having customers collect real world failure recovery data (DAgger style) for free every time FSD disengages, the Optimus Academy will need paid teleoperators or onsite operators to collect the recovery data. Assuming 1 person can manage 2 robots to start that would cost $3.5B in labor per year (30,000 robots, $40/hr fully loaded, 16 hrs/day, 365 days per year, 2:1 robot:operator). Tesla can come up with the money to do this but money doesn’t solve the “mock data” problem. Given the higher degrees of freedom in humanoids vs. cars, training a generalized humanoid will be harder and require more data than a self-driving vehicle. The best way to train your robot is by deploying them in the diverse real world, subsidized by real customer operations. Humanoids face a chicken and egg where it’s very hard to bootstrap your way to a first policy that’s good enough to deploy in real production environments. This is an extremely capital intensive playbook (which doesn’t even include cost of training). Time will tell if it works but a better playbook would be finding a way to copy the FSD playbook.
1:54

Data has always been the bottleneck for physical AI in self driving and robotics. Tesla is taking two very different approaches for FSD and Optimus. Tesla’s Optimus Training Playbook: 1. Build 30k Optimus Gen 3 robots 2. Operate them in a mock environment where they can perform self-play “Optimus Academy” 3. Train in sim using the real robot data to close sim2real gap. Tesla FSD Training Playbook: 1. Sell millions of cars outfitted with cheap cameras 2. Collect diverse real world driving data (especially intervention and failure recovery data) for free as a byproduct of customers driving the cars. 3. Use driving data to train Autopilot/FSD and deploy policies incrementally as a supervised FSD product 4. Repeat until policy reaches robust unsupervised full self driving for robotaxi launch. The Tesla FSD playbook is a beautiful self-funding, customer subsidized, diverse real world data flywheel. The Optimus playbook is the opposite and shares none of the beautiful attributes of the FSD training flywheel that made FSD successful. The key differences: 1. Instead of having customers pay you for vehicles, Tesla will need to fund 30,000 Optimus robots. Assuming the current landed cost per unit is $100k, that will be $3B to build plus another ~30% per year for maintenance labor and spare parts given it’s still an unhardened pre-production prototype is another $900M per year. For reference, Tesla’s GAAP net income in 2025 was $3.8B. 2. Instead of having customers drive their Teslas on roads all across the world giving Tesla an insanely rich and diverse dataset that Waymo and other AV companies could never collect, the Optimus Academy is doing the equivalent of building a fake town in a parking lot and driving their car in that parking lot. No matter how real you try to make the environments for self-play you can never replicate the diversity, complexity and failure modes of the real world. Data collected in staged environments produces demo-grade policies and will not be rich enough to generalize to the vast diversity of environments, tasks, objects, etc. out of distribution. 3. Instead of having customers collect real world failure recovery data (DAgger style) for free every time FSD disengages, the Optimus Academy will need paid teleoperators or onsite operators to collect the recovery data. Assuming 1 person can manage 2 robots to start that would cost $3.5B in labor per year (30,000 robots, $40/hr fully loaded, 16 hrs/day, 365 days per year, 2:1 robot:operator). Tesla can come up with the money to do this but money doesn’t solve the “mock data” problem. Given the higher degrees of freedom in humanoids vs. cars, training a generalized humanoid will be harder and require more data than a self-driving vehicle. The best way to train your robot is by deploying them in the diverse real world, subsidized by real customer operations. Humanoids face a chicken and egg where it’s very hard to bootstrap your way to a first policy that’s good enough to deploy in real production environments. This is an extremely capital intensive playbook (which doesn’t even include cost of training). Time will tell if it works but a better playbook would be finding a way to copy the FSD playbook.

Simon Kalouche

34,671 views • 6 months ago

Hugh Grant, "Politicians mistakenly believe that their entire careers and fate rely on sucking up to the owners of tabloid newspapers" "But such was the pressure of the big newspaper barons on government, and such was the cowardice of government, that they found a tiny technical loophole in the legislative process" "Here we are 12 years later, having waited 12 years for a Labour government, Labour said to victims of press abuse with their terrible stories. Labour said: its ok guys, the Tories are awful, once we're here we'll take care of this" "Suddenly as the election loomed last year, dead silence from Labour" "Since Labour have been in government, absolutely nothing" "On the contrary, what we're now seeing is a repetition of what happened under the Blair government" "Where you have a Labour government sucking up to the very organisations that perpetrated these abuses in the first place" "You have Keir Starmer the Prime Minister writing articles for The Sun. Having lunch with Lachlan Murdoch last year. Hiring the ex Chief Operating Officer of News UK, the Murdoch news company in this country, as the most important communications civil servant in Number 10" "Arranging for Rupert Murdoch to be at the big state banquet for Trump. And having him sit right next to Morgan McSweeney who is the PM's chief of staff" "And it's pretty hard to stomach for the families who were promised so much by Labour" Tom Bradby, "Are you saying to me that the pledge that Keir Starmer made to you and other victims was unequivocal, and that you feel personally betrayed by the fact they have done nothing about it" Hugh Grant, "Yeah, all the victims feel personally betrayed by all the politicians and most depressingly by this Labour government" "Labour were marvellous in opposition" "Labour politicians were very supportive to these families who were really brave, and then when push came to shove, they made this decision clearly. And it's a mistaken decision" "That it's more important for them, for their political careers. For the sake of their party, their bl**dy party, that they make nice with the big newspaper barons, than they do what's right for these families" "And lets face it, for the country" "And what Hacked Off if here to do right now is to try and put pressure on this government on this prime minister to finally do something that will protect those families" "We're asking the PM to do something, to create a law, that makes newspapers obey basic standards of decency" "And in doing that to create a press in this country that we can be proud of, that we can rely on. Which is absolutely essential in this day and age" "I watch, we all watch, liberal democracies that we have happily enjoyed for 30, 40, 50 years, gradually start to disappear" "If you don't have a reliable press, you're in real trouble. You're left to the cowboys of social media"
5:43

Hugh Grant, "Politicians mistakenly believe that their entire careers and fate rely on sucking up to the owners of tabloid newspapers" "But such was the pressure of the big newspaper barons on government, and such was the cowardice of government, that they found a tiny technical loophole in the legislative process" "Here we are 12 years later, having waited 12 years for a Labour government, Labour said to victims of press abuse with their terrible stories. Labour said: its ok guys, the Tories are awful, once we're here we'll take care of this" "Suddenly as the election loomed last year, dead silence from Labour" "Since Labour have been in government, absolutely nothing" "On the contrary, what we're now seeing is a repetition of what happened under the Blair government" "Where you have a Labour government sucking up to the very organisations that perpetrated these abuses in the first place" "You have Keir Starmer the Prime Minister writing articles for The Sun. Having lunch with Lachlan Murdoch last year. Hiring the ex Chief Operating Officer of News UK, the Murdoch news company in this country, as the most important communications civil servant in Number 10" "Arranging for Rupert Murdoch to be at the big state banquet for Trump. And having him sit right next to Morgan McSweeney who is the PM's chief of staff" "And it's pretty hard to stomach for the families who were promised so much by Labour" Tom Bradby, "Are you saying to me that the pledge that Keir Starmer made to you and other victims was unequivocal, and that you feel personally betrayed by the fact they have done nothing about it" Hugh Grant, "Yeah, all the victims feel personally betrayed by all the politicians and most depressingly by this Labour government" "Labour were marvellous in opposition" "Labour politicians were very supportive to these families who were really brave, and then when push came to shove, they made this decision clearly. And it's a mistaken decision" "That it's more important for them, for their political careers. For the sake of their party, their bl**dy party, that they make nice with the big newspaper barons, than they do what's right for these families" "And lets face it, for the country" "And what Hacked Off if here to do right now is to try and put pressure on this government on this prime minister to finally do something that will protect those families" "We're asking the PM to do something, to create a law, that makes newspapers obey basic standards of decency" "And in doing that to create a press in this country that we can be proud of, that we can rely on. Which is absolutely essential in this day and age" "I watch, we all watch, liberal democracies that we have happily enjoyed for 30, 40, 50 years, gradually start to disappear" "If you don't have a reliable press, you're in real trouble. You're left to the cowboys of social media"

Farrukh

374,166 views • 10 months ago

The Epstein Class at it's finest: if you don't agree with this 'under 16s ban' then you're defending pedophiles and groomers online. Coming from a literal pedophile protector... Mandelson and Saville come to mind. Look at this little rat scumbag - he can't even hide his glee. The face, the laugh, the inner demon is on full display for everyone to see. He is absolutely loving every single second of selling you out. This has absolutely nothing to do with protecting children and everything to do with total, calculated control. The 'save the kids' narrative was always the bait; the real prize is absolute surveillance and the total destruction of an adult's right to a privat life. Worse than that; the sheep have signed us up for a real time, real world panopticon. It is not just online anymore - it is the physical rollout of automated 'social credit scores,' mandatory digital IDs, total biometric surveillance, and state-enforced behaviour management. They have handed this regime the keys to track your wallet, your movement, and your mind, ushering in a brutal era of dystopian control where stepping out of line means being deleted from society with a single keystroke. First step: they are stripping away online anonymity so they can harvest, track, and log every single move you make. Why else do you think they are aggressively building massive data centres across the country? It's not to host gaming servers - it's the storage infrastructure for a 24/7 wireless digital dragnet. It never has been, and never will be, about the children. While you are forced to submit facial biometrics and digital IDs just to open an app, MPs, Lords, civil servants and government allies will inevitably be exempt from having their phones screened and monitored. Rules for thee, but never for them. Well done, Britain. You had a golden opportunity to see through the 'save the children' lie and stop this dystopian lockdown in its tracks. Instead, you were far too busy falling for fake 'movements' designed to distract and divide, and sleepwalking straight into a digital cage. You stripped us ALL of our privacy, anonymity and freedoms and now you have exactly the totalitarian state you deserve. Enjoy the surveillance.
2:25

The Epstein Class at it's finest: if you don't agree with this 'under 16s ban' then you're defending pedophiles and groomers online. Coming from a literal pedophile protector... Mandelson and Saville come to mind. Look at this little rat scumbag - he can't even hide his glee. The face, the laugh, the inner demon is on full display for everyone to see. He is absolutely loving every single second of selling you out. This has absolutely nothing to do with protecting children and everything to do with total, calculated control. The 'save the kids' narrative was always the bait; the real prize is absolute surveillance and the total destruction of an adult's right to a privat life. Worse than that; the sheep have signed us up for a real time, real world panopticon. It is not just online anymore - it is the physical rollout of automated 'social credit scores,' mandatory digital IDs, total biometric surveillance, and state-enforced behaviour management. They have handed this regime the keys to track your wallet, your movement, and your mind, ushering in a brutal era of dystopian control where stepping out of line means being deleted from society with a single keystroke. First step: they are stripping away online anonymity so they can harvest, track, and log every single move you make. Why else do you think they are aggressively building massive data centres across the country? It's not to host gaming servers - it's the storage infrastructure for a 24/7 wireless digital dragnet. It never has been, and never will be, about the children. While you are forced to submit facial biometrics and digital IDs just to open an app, MPs, Lords, civil servants and government allies will inevitably be exempt from having their phones screened and monitored. Rules for thee, but never for them. Well done, Britain. You had a golden opportunity to see through the 'save the children' lie and stop this dystopian lockdown in its tracks. Instead, you were far too busy falling for fake 'movements' designed to distract and divide, and sleepwalking straight into a digital cage. You stripped us ALL of our privacy, anonymity and freedoms and now you have exactly the totalitarian state you deserve. Enjoy the surveillance.

Fiona Rose Diamond

192,177 views • 1 month ago

This is what real respect for a president looks like. He never needed to cancel comedians or extort media companies, Fortune 500 CEOs or trusted trading partners. He never bent the knee to Vladimir Putin, a convicted war criminal. He never blamed the victim of an illegal invasion for having caused a conflict. He never instigated a federal sales tax on every American calling it a tariff and pretended foreign countries paid the bill. And he certainly did not preside over the biggest transfer of wealth from the bottom to the top in American history. He never removed the healthcare and SNAP payments of millions of Americans, while removing consumer and environmental protections against clean air and clean water. He never pretended prices were going down when they were going up. He never threatened to invade Canada, Greenland or Panama. He never setup a crypto bribe pipeline and earned $5 billion in his first 6 months in office, by using the seal of the President to extort those seeking access to favors. He never deployed the military to American cities and condoned the abduction of people by masked men from the streets, and he never deported people to concentration camps. He never defunded universities, scientific research including for childhood cancer and never endangered the lives of children by the integrating conspiracy theories into critical vaccines programs for preventable childhood diseases. He never removed the right to bodily autonomy for women or forced them to risk death to preserve an unviable fetus. Or to face imprisonment for a miscarriage. He never tried to ban access to medicated abortion, or try to limit access to contraception. He never tore up the Rose Garden and paved over it with concrete and cheap looking parasols. He never decorated the Oval Office like a 17th Century French brothel, and he definitely did not sell American citizenship. He never committed crimes against the English language and sentence structure. And was never a laughing stock on the world stage, neither did he travel abroad to lecture world leaders on the free speech he was denying his own citizens. He never gave a speech before a monarch during which people cringed and wanted to crawl into a hole with embarrassment for him. He did however win the heart of Queen Elizabeth II who asked him if he would return to visit after his presidency. He did visit Buckingham Palace three times and the Queen allowed his daughters to sit in the Royal carriage as an enduring sign of her affection for him and his family. He was never a fan of wearing orange face paint or living on Big Macs and full sugar Coca-Cola. Oh and did I mention he didn’t cheat at golf? He never lost a presidential election and won the Nobel Peace prize, as well as numerous international honors, and did speak to a joint gathering of the Lords and the Commons in the historic Westminster hall at the Houses of Parliament. But in the spirit of balance, he DID wear a tan suit! Was guilty of being the most popular president in American history and could speak using full sentences, cadence with oratory dynamics. Oh and he wasn’t obese and in such poor health that he lived with cankles and bruised hands from cannulas. Other than this they are like two peas in a pod 🫛 🎥 TikTok -
1:02

This is what real respect for a president looks like. He never needed to cancel comedians or extort media companies, Fortune 500 CEOs or trusted trading partners. He never bent the knee to Vladimir Putin, a convicted war criminal. He never blamed the victim of an illegal invasion for having caused a conflict. He never instigated a federal sales tax on every American calling it a tariff and pretended foreign countries paid the bill. And he certainly did not preside over the biggest transfer of wealth from the bottom to the top in American history. He never removed the healthcare and SNAP payments of millions of Americans, while removing consumer and environmental protections against clean air and clean water. He never pretended prices were going down when they were going up. He never threatened to invade Canada, Greenland or Panama. He never setup a crypto bribe pipeline and earned $5 billion in his first 6 months in office, by using the seal of the President to extort those seeking access to favors. He never deployed the military to American cities and condoned the abduction of people by masked men from the streets, and he never deported people to concentration camps. He never defunded universities, scientific research including for childhood cancer and never endangered the lives of children by the integrating conspiracy theories into critical vaccines programs for preventable childhood diseases. He never removed the right to bodily autonomy for women or forced them to risk death to preserve an unviable fetus. Or to face imprisonment for a miscarriage. He never tried to ban access to medicated abortion, or try to limit access to contraception. He never tore up the Rose Garden and paved over it with concrete and cheap looking parasols. He never decorated the Oval Office like a 17th Century French brothel, and he definitely did not sell American citizenship. He never committed crimes against the English language and sentence structure. And was never a laughing stock on the world stage, neither did he travel abroad to lecture world leaders on the free speech he was denying his own citizens. He never gave a speech before a monarch during which people cringed and wanted to crawl into a hole with embarrassment for him. He did however win the heart of Queen Elizabeth II who asked him if he would return to visit after his presidency. He did visit Buckingham Palace three times and the Queen allowed his daughters to sit in the Royal carriage as an enduring sign of her affection for him and his family. He was never a fan of wearing orange face paint or living on Big Macs and full sugar Coca-Cola. Oh and did I mention he didn’t cheat at golf? He never lost a presidential election and won the Nobel Peace prize, as well as numerous international honors, and did speak to a joint gathering of the Lords and the Commons in the historic Westminster hall at the Houses of Parliament. But in the spirit of balance, he DID wear a tan suit! Was guilty of being the most popular president in American history and could speak using full sentences, cadence with oratory dynamics. Oh and he wasn’t obese and in such poor health that he lived with cankles and bruised hands from cannulas. Other than this they are like two peas in a pod 🫛 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

27,266 views • 10 months ago

"X is a shit show" "X is for Nazis" "X is all about Elon Musk" "X is too noisy" "X's algorithm sucks" How many of you have heard stuff like that? I do, especially when I go to other social media sites, like Threads, which just passed X in total users. I find attitudes like that uninformed, but what stopped an uninformed person from writing something on the Internet? Nothing. But since I jumped over to Threads today and got another eye full of that kind of stuff. So I mostly wanted to say thank you to the community of tens of thousands of people in tech that I follow, and show you what my screens look like today. If you turn on audio on the video here, you'll hear me talk through each of my lists. I use X Pro and lists. And by using them I find even my For You feed gets better. Much better, in fact. Why? Because if you engage on the REAL X, which you can only see on X Pro with lists, the algorithm figures out the kinds of things that catch your eye and looks for more. Also, by following lists you give the algorithm VERY IMPORTANT signal and a lot more things to choose from. Even if you just follow my feeds and never use them, your For You feed will get better BECAUSE you gave the algorithm more signal about what you want to see. If I see a brilliant person, or a new company, I put them on my lists. If I see someone go political all the time I remove them from my lists, or, maybe put them on my news lists if they are posting an interesting point of view that I would want to watch over time. These are the most complete lists in tech industry here on X, by far. I read through a LOT of lists: https:// ts And here is how I have my lists laid out in X Pro. If you are in the AI industry and you aren't following all my AI lists you are hurting yourself and ignoring many thousands of hours of work I've put into them over 18 years of being here on this service. I can only do this on X. The companies, for instance, aren't on the other services, and the AI research and development community here is stronger and more educational than they are on other services. And, because of Grok integration here, X is a far better learning platform. If I see a scientist sharing something I don't understand I click the Grok button and it teaches me a lot more. Thank you. And, yes, there are many other "X's" that I don't see. Sports, being one. I focus only on tech and educated people and my lists show that X is the best place for science, technology, and nerdy news. One last thing: the algorithm will, in about a month, radically change to be totally AI driven. When that happens X will radically change and lists will become even more important as a source of signal. If you want a better X, here's the key. Love!
10:53

"X is a shit show" "X is for Nazis" "X is all about Elon Musk" "X is too noisy" "X's algorithm sucks" How many of you have heard stuff like that? I do, especially when I go to other social media sites, like Threads, which just passed X in total users. I find attitudes like that uninformed, but what stopped an uninformed person from writing something on the Internet? Nothing. But since I jumped over to Threads today and got another eye full of that kind of stuff. So I mostly wanted to say thank you to the community of tens of thousands of people in tech that I follow, and show you what my screens look like today. If you turn on audio on the video here, you'll hear me talk through each of my lists. I use X Pro and lists. And by using them I find even my For You feed gets better. Much better, in fact. Why? Because if you engage on the REAL X, which you can only see on X Pro with lists, the algorithm figures out the kinds of things that catch your eye and looks for more. Also, by following lists you give the algorithm VERY IMPORTANT signal and a lot more things to choose from. Even if you just follow my feeds and never use them, your For You feed will get better BECAUSE you gave the algorithm more signal about what you want to see. If I see a brilliant person, or a new company, I put them on my lists. If I see someone go political all the time I remove them from my lists, or, maybe put them on my news lists if they are posting an interesting point of view that I would want to watch over time. These are the most complete lists in tech industry here on X, by far. I read through a LOT of lists: https:// ts And here is how I have my lists laid out in X Pro. If you are in the AI industry and you aren't following all my AI lists you are hurting yourself and ignoring many thousands of hours of work I've put into them over 18 years of being here on this service. I can only do this on X. The companies, for instance, aren't on the other services, and the AI research and development community here is stronger and more educational than they are on other services. And, because of Grok integration here, X is a far better learning platform. If I see a scientist sharing something I don't understand I click the Grok button and it teaches me a lot more. Thank you. And, yes, there are many other "X's" that I don't see. Sports, being one. I focus only on tech and educated people and my lists show that X is the best place for science, technology, and nerdy news. One last thing: the algorithm will, in about a month, radically change to be totally AI driven. When that happens X will radically change and lists will become even more important as a source of signal. If you want a better X, here's the key. Love!

Robert Scoble

43,712 views • 10 months ago

During the Oxford-style debate at the "Interpreting Europe Conference 2025," I persuaded many professional interpreters to reject the motion: "AI-powered interpretation will never replace human interpretation." Before the debate, the audience was 60-40 in favor of the motion; after, it was about 50-50. The full video is on Youtube. Here is a rough transcript of my speech: Thanks to Gry Gry Hasselbalch for her thoughtful presentation. She argued that AI-supported interpretation will never replace human interpretation. I can't believe that. Today's automatic translators are based on algorithmic methods that my team published at TUM in 1990-1991. Back then, compute was about 10 million times more expensive than it is today, and there wasn't much you could do with our methods - automatic translators at the time could do almost nothing. But since 1941, when the first general-purpose computer was completed, compute has become 10 times cheaper every 5 years. In 2011, compute was already 10,000 times cheaper than in 1991, but the automatic translators still sucked. The Chinese laughed at the automatic translations from Google and other providers. But just five years later, in November 2016, they were no longer laughing, because compute was now 100,000 times cheaper than in 1991, and that was enough: Google suddenly achieved a huge improvement in translation quality through our neural network called LSTM. A year later, everyone was doing it: in 2017, Facebook was using our LSTM to translate 4 billion messages every day. The translations were still not perfect, but now they were getting significantly better every year. Today, a decade after the breakthrough, we have gained another factor of 100, and the translations are already much better than those of 2016. They are certainly better than my own. That's why I also used an AI to translate this text :-) Of course, AI interpreters are already superhuman in some respects, as they can translate for thousands of people simultaneously in dozens of different languages. No human can do that. But when it comes to translation quality, the best human interpreters are still better than the best AIs. But for how much longer? The aforementioned trend will not stop in the coming decades, because the known physical limits of computing are still a long way off. In the next 30 years, compute will again become a million of times cheaper. Everything that seems impressive to us today will seem trivial in retrospect. For this reason alone, no one can seriously believe that AI-supported interpretation will _never_ replace human interpretation. What about the most outstanding of all translations? My favorite example is “The Catcher in the Rye” by Nobel Prize winner J.D. Salinger. Who translated it congenially into German? It was another winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature, Heinrich Böll. One might now hope that such congenial translations are only possible for true people who really know through personal experience what it means to walk barefoot through a field and have all the profoundly human experiences that befall the protagonist of the story. But even in this area, human dominance is not assured. I suspect that the best machine translators will be those who have not only read all the world's literature, who are not just encoders and decoders of sentences, but also have experience in controlling complex humanoid agents that not only have cameras and microphones, but also millions upon millions of touch and pain sensors, and can act in the real world and in principle experience much of what humans experience, interacting with real humans, and learning to better predict their behaviors. These do not yet exist today, but at least simple variants of them have been around for a long time and the prototypes are getting better and better: artificial agents whose main purpose in life is to learn from experience, avoid pain and maximize reward, just like humans. When such agents combine their experience in the real world with the art of expressing themselves like a typical Nobel Prize winner in literature, which can already be acquired today through diligent reading, it seems absurd to assume that AI-supported high quality interpretation will never replace human interpretation. “Never” is such a bold, presumptuous word! Just a few decades ago, many believed that AI would never pass the Turing test, never play chess superhumanly well, never solve difficult math problems formulated in natural language, and so on. All this proved to be a misconception. Consider again that AI gets a million times better per euro every 30 years. It seems inevitable: soon, interpreting AIs will eclipse almost all human interpreters in every important way. Thank you. Final remark: "Unfortunately, Juergen didn't have time to participate in this debate, so he sent me, his avatar." The debate led the charming moderator Andrea Grosso to accept the possibility that AIs will eclipse human interpreters. However, he pointed out that this will take a very long time. My avatar said: "I agree that it will take a long time. This could take months, if not years.”
7:48

During the Oxford-style debate at the "Interpreting Europe Conference 2025," I persuaded many professional interpreters to reject the motion: "AI-powered interpretation will never replace human interpretation." Before the debate, the audience was 60-40 in favor of the motion; after, it was about 50-50. The full video is on Youtube. Here is a rough transcript of my speech: Thanks to Gry Gry Hasselbalch for her thoughtful presentation. She argued that AI-supported interpretation will never replace human interpretation. I can't believe that. Today's automatic translators are based on algorithmic methods that my team published at TUM in 1990-1991. Back then, compute was about 10 million times more expensive than it is today, and there wasn't much you could do with our methods - automatic translators at the time could do almost nothing. But since 1941, when the first general-purpose computer was completed, compute has become 10 times cheaper every 5 years. In 2011, compute was already 10,000 times cheaper than in 1991, but the automatic translators still sucked. The Chinese laughed at the automatic translations from Google and other providers. But just five years later, in November 2016, they were no longer laughing, because compute was now 100,000 times cheaper than in 1991, and that was enough: Google suddenly achieved a huge improvement in translation quality through our neural network called LSTM. A year later, everyone was doing it: in 2017, Facebook was using our LSTM to translate 4 billion messages every day. The translations were still not perfect, but now they were getting significantly better every year. Today, a decade after the breakthrough, we have gained another factor of 100, and the translations are already much better than those of 2016. They are certainly better than my own. That's why I also used an AI to translate this text :-) Of course, AI interpreters are already superhuman in some respects, as they can translate for thousands of people simultaneously in dozens of different languages. No human can do that. But when it comes to translation quality, the best human interpreters are still better than the best AIs. But for how much longer? The aforementioned trend will not stop in the coming decades, because the known physical limits of computing are still a long way off. In the next 30 years, compute will again become a million of times cheaper. Everything that seems impressive to us today will seem trivial in retrospect. For this reason alone, no one can seriously believe that AI-supported interpretation will _never_ replace human interpretation. What about the most outstanding of all translations? My favorite example is “The Catcher in the Rye” by Nobel Prize winner J.D. Salinger. Who translated it congenially into German? It was another winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature, Heinrich Böll. One might now hope that such congenial translations are only possible for true people who really know through personal experience what it means to walk barefoot through a field and have all the profoundly human experiences that befall the protagonist of the story. But even in this area, human dominance is not assured. I suspect that the best machine translators will be those who have not only read all the world's literature, who are not just encoders and decoders of sentences, but also have experience in controlling complex humanoid agents that not only have cameras and microphones, but also millions upon millions of touch and pain sensors, and can act in the real world and in principle experience much of what humans experience, interacting with real humans, and learning to better predict their behaviors. These do not yet exist today, but at least simple variants of them have been around for a long time and the prototypes are getting better and better: artificial agents whose main purpose in life is to learn from experience, avoid pain and maximize reward, just like humans. When such agents combine their experience in the real world with the art of expressing themselves like a typical Nobel Prize winner in literature, which can already be acquired today through diligent reading, it seems absurd to assume that AI-supported high quality interpretation will never replace human interpretation. “Never” is such a bold, presumptuous word! Just a few decades ago, many believed that AI would never pass the Turing test, never play chess superhumanly well, never solve difficult math problems formulated in natural language, and so on. All this proved to be a misconception. Consider again that AI gets a million times better per euro every 30 years. It seems inevitable: soon, interpreting AIs will eclipse almost all human interpreters in every important way. Thank you. Final remark: "Unfortunately, Juergen didn't have time to participate in this debate, so he sent me, his avatar." The debate led the charming moderator Andrea Grosso to accept the possibility that AIs will eclipse human interpreters. However, he pointed out that this will take a very long time. My avatar said: "I agree that it will take a long time. This could take months, if not years.”

Jürgen Schmidhuber

36,279 views • 1 year ago

Texas isn't just big—it's got history so wild it sounds made up. Most folks have no clue about these 10 insane facts that are 100% real. Picture this: For nine whole years, from 1836 to 1845, Texas wasn't a state at all—it was its own independent country. The Republic of Texas had its own president, printed its own money, fielded its own army, and even had diplomatic relations with other nations. It wasn't just a rebellious territory; it was a full-on sovereign nation that later chose to join the United States. Then there's the Texas Constitution. It's longer than the entire U.S. Constitution—clocking in at over 90,000 words, making it one of the longest governing documents anywhere. Why so wordy? Texans built in strict limits on government power because they never trusted centralized authority after breaking away from Mexico. And that Lone Star flag you see everywhere? Texas earned a special perk when it joined the Union: It's the only state legally allowed to fly its state flag at the same height as the American flag. No other state gets that honor, because Texas came in as an equal partner, not just another territory. Speaking of flags, six different ones have flown over Texas soil: Spain, France, Mexico, the Republic of Texas, the Confederacy, and the United States. That's more national flags than any other state can claim—it's literally the 'Six Flags Over Texas' story in real life. Here's one that blows minds: Under the terms of its 1845 annexation agreement, Texas still has the legal right to split itself into up to five separate states without needing Congress's permission. It's never happened, but the option's still on the table. Now zoom out to South Texas—the legendary King Ranch sprawls across more than 825,000 acres. That's bigger than the entire state of Rhode Island. We're not talking a family farm; this place is basically its own small country, running cattle, horses, and history since the 1850s. Independence didn't come easy. When Texas declared itself free from Mexico in 1836, only 59 brave men signed the declaration. Fifty-nine signatures changed everything, turning a province into a nation that would grow into America's second-largest state. Then came the Battle of San Jacinto in 1836—the fight that sealed Texas independence. It lasted just 18 minutes. In less time than a long TikTok scroll, Sam Houston's forces crushed Santa Anna's army: 630 Mexican soldiers fell, while only nine Texans died. That's how fast freedom was won. As the Republic, Texas racked up serious debt. When it joined the U.S., the deal included America taking on that debt—but in exchange, Texas gave up huge chunks of land that are now parts of New Mexico, Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Wyoming. It was a massive land giveaway to erase the bills. Finally, the Alamo. In 1836, around 200 Texan defenders held that mission against thousands of Mexican troops for 13 straight days. They all perished, but their stand bought Sam Houston precious time to rally an army, leading straight to that lightning victory at San Jacinto. 'Remember the Alamo' isn't just a slogan—it's the reason Texas won its freedom. Texas history is full of these jaw-droppers. Drop your favorite Texas fact in the comments, and follow for more stories they don't teach in school. Don't mess with Texas—it's got the receipts to prove why.
2:18

Texas isn't just big—it's got history so wild it sounds made up. Most folks have no clue about these 10 insane facts that are 100% real. Picture this: For nine whole years, from 1836 to 1845, Texas wasn't a state at all—it was its own independent country. The Republic of Texas had its own president, printed its own money, fielded its own army, and even had diplomatic relations with other nations. It wasn't just a rebellious territory; it was a full-on sovereign nation that later chose to join the United States. Then there's the Texas Constitution. It's longer than the entire U.S. Constitution—clocking in at over 90,000 words, making it one of the longest governing documents anywhere. Why so wordy? Texans built in strict limits on government power because they never trusted centralized authority after breaking away from Mexico. And that Lone Star flag you see everywhere? Texas earned a special perk when it joined the Union: It's the only state legally allowed to fly its state flag at the same height as the American flag. No other state gets that honor, because Texas came in as an equal partner, not just another territory. Speaking of flags, six different ones have flown over Texas soil: Spain, France, Mexico, the Republic of Texas, the Confederacy, and the United States. That's more national flags than any other state can claim—it's literally the 'Six Flags Over Texas' story in real life. Here's one that blows minds: Under the terms of its 1845 annexation agreement, Texas still has the legal right to split itself into up to five separate states without needing Congress's permission. It's never happened, but the option's still on the table. Now zoom out to South Texas—the legendary King Ranch sprawls across more than 825,000 acres. That's bigger than the entire state of Rhode Island. We're not talking a family farm; this place is basically its own small country, running cattle, horses, and history since the 1850s. Independence didn't come easy. When Texas declared itself free from Mexico in 1836, only 59 brave men signed the declaration. Fifty-nine signatures changed everything, turning a province into a nation that would grow into America's second-largest state. Then came the Battle of San Jacinto in 1836—the fight that sealed Texas independence. It lasted just 18 minutes. In less time than a long TikTok scroll, Sam Houston's forces crushed Santa Anna's army: 630 Mexican soldiers fell, while only nine Texans died. That's how fast freedom was won. As the Republic, Texas racked up serious debt. When it joined the U.S., the deal included America taking on that debt—but in exchange, Texas gave up huge chunks of land that are now parts of New Mexico, Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Wyoming. It was a massive land giveaway to erase the bills. Finally, the Alamo. In 1836, around 200 Texan defenders held that mission against thousands of Mexican troops for 13 straight days. They all perished, but their stand bought Sam Houston precious time to rally an army, leading straight to that lightning victory at San Jacinto. 'Remember the Alamo' isn't just a slogan—it's the reason Texas won its freedom. Texas history is full of these jaw-droppers. Drop your favorite Texas fact in the comments, and follow for more stories they don't teach in school. Don't mess with Texas—it's got the receipts to prove why.

🌟🇺🇸Nancy Hamm🇺🇸🌟

18,469 views • 4 months ago

I can't believe I managed to roast Craig in my very first sentence on This Morning 😂 sorry! 🎄 Thanks to This Morning for having me on so I could show everyone there's nothing wrong with gluten-free food! (and sneak in a few important things about following a gluten-free diet, Coeliac disease and Coeliac_UK) You can watch the full clip on their website here: All the GF recipes I made (yorkshire puds, gingerbread stuffing and bread sauce) are there in full too 👌🏻 Big thanks to everyone who watched, did you? - if you enjoyed it or want to see me on there again, please let them know! & huge thanks to Craig, Josie Gibson and the entire team behind the show, you are all fabulous 🧡 After the comments made the other day, I felt like there was a big weight on my shoulders to set the record straight... and I knew it would be very tricky to do that whilst making 3 different recipes in the space of 7 minutes!! But thanks to all your support, I think I did ok (or so I’ve been told - it’s all a bit of a whirlwind still) Hopefully everyone can now see that gluten-free food doesn't have to look or taste any different to 'normal' food, nor does everyone have to be eating their own separate meals at Christmas! As I said, being gluten-free is NOT a choice so please don't think of us as difficult! 🙅🏼‍♀️ Oh and of course preventing cross contamination is crucial for ALL who have coeliac disease!
0:43

I can't believe I managed to roast Craig in my very first sentence on This Morning 😂 sorry! 🎄 Thanks to This Morning for having me on so I could show everyone there's nothing wrong with gluten-free food! (and sneak in a few important things about following a gluten-free diet, Coeliac disease and Coeliac_UK) You can watch the full clip on their website here: All the GF recipes I made (yorkshire puds, gingerbread stuffing and bread sauce) are there in full too 👌🏻 Big thanks to everyone who watched, did you? - if you enjoyed it or want to see me on there again, please let them know! & huge thanks to Craig, Josie Gibson and the entire team behind the show, you are all fabulous 🧡 After the comments made the other day, I felt like there was a big weight on my shoulders to set the record straight... and I knew it would be very tricky to do that whilst making 3 different recipes in the space of 7 minutes!! But thanks to all your support, I think I did ok (or so I’ve been told - it’s all a bit of a whirlwind still) Hopefully everyone can now see that gluten-free food doesn't have to look or taste any different to 'normal' food, nor does everyone have to be eating their own separate meals at Christmas! As I said, being gluten-free is NOT a choice so please don't think of us as difficult! 🙅🏼‍♀️ Oh and of course preventing cross contamination is crucial for ALL who have coeliac disease!

Becky Excell 💙

180,044 views • 2 years ago

TOS re-watch day 26: "Devil in the Dark" is absolutely a Top 5 episode for me, from the original series. There are only a handful of other TOS episodes I've re-watched as often as this one, and it remains excellent all these years later. Everything that makes TOS fire on all cylinders is present in this episode: a genuinely alien mystery, the big three cast each getting opportunities to flex his acting chops, an engineering dilemma for Scotty to solve, good guest stars who inhabit their roles nicely, and a practical worldbuilding problem which drives the drama: beyond dealing with a mere monster inhabiting the shadows, Kirk and his crew have to get the mining colony back into operation for the sake of many other Federation colonies who all rely on the miners' product. The questionable physics of a silicon-based deep-dish pizza creature moving through basalt the way we move through air, takes a back seat to the human problem of confronting a murderous entity which only reveals its true nature at the very end. When the miners have to also face their nature. Each of the species reacting against the other, until Spock (with the mind meld) can broker an understanding. I mentioned in my last review that this was a far better example of Nimoy being unleashed from his stone-faced stoicism, than was true in, "This Side of Paradise." Considering the fact Nimoy is having to convincingly and heavily emote—while clutching at throbbing bladders of spray-painted foam—really shows his range. Meanwhile, the irascible DeForest Kelley gets in several Bones-ian lines such as, "I'm a doctor, not a bricklayer!" while barking orders to a junior officer on the ship, and questioning Spock's theses, at the same time simultaneously giving us clues to the mystery through cool-headed forensic talk. And this specific scene—where Shatner discovers the main clutch of Horta eggs—he's staring up into the ceiling of a sound stage. But has to make the audience think he's just seen the most astounding sight imaginable, which suddenly makes him realize just what it is the Horta's been killing for in the first place. Ken Lynch is terrific as Chief Vanderberg, and had an extensive credits history through film and television. A very comfortably familiar face who absolutely sells himself as the production-minded miners' boss. Miner Schmitter (Bill Elliott) likewise had a healthy list of credits, and was important in his brief but key portrayal of a working blue-collar man facing annihilation at the hands of the monster. Security Chief Giotto (John Duke, aka: Barry Russo) would later appear as Commodore Wesley in TOS episode, "The Ultimate Computer." And like Elliott and Lynch, had quite a run of credits. Unlike some other TOS outings, there really isn't much to complain about with this one. The scripting is tight, the plot advances smoothly, the anticipation (as well as horror) is real, and the solution at the end proves quite satisfying. And once again we have clear, undeniable proof that the Federation is not a moneyless utopia, much to the chagrin of Marxist Trekkies. Kirk remarks that Vanderberg and his men are going to be embarrassingly rich once the hatched Horta get going. Likewise, the other colonies depending on Janus VI for rare ores (like the fictional Pergium) are clearly *paying* for the stuff. And any delay in mining or shipping poses a big enough threat to the function of those colonies that Starfleet Command detours the Enterprise to investigate and solve the issue. Thus the economy surrounding the mining is integral to the plot, and inseparable from the worldbuilding. I love this episode. Start to finish. Again, Top 5 for TOS in my book.
1:41

TOS re-watch day 26: "Devil in the Dark" is absolutely a Top 5 episode for me, from the original series. There are only a handful of other TOS episodes I've re-watched as often as this one, and it remains excellent all these years later. Everything that makes TOS fire on all cylinders is present in this episode: a genuinely alien mystery, the big three cast each getting opportunities to flex his acting chops, an engineering dilemma for Scotty to solve, good guest stars who inhabit their roles nicely, and a practical worldbuilding problem which drives the drama: beyond dealing with a mere monster inhabiting the shadows, Kirk and his crew have to get the mining colony back into operation for the sake of many other Federation colonies who all rely on the miners' product. The questionable physics of a silicon-based deep-dish pizza creature moving through basalt the way we move through air, takes a back seat to the human problem of confronting a murderous entity which only reveals its true nature at the very end. When the miners have to also face their nature. Each of the species reacting against the other, until Spock (with the mind meld) can broker an understanding. I mentioned in my last review that this was a far better example of Nimoy being unleashed from his stone-faced stoicism, than was true in, "This Side of Paradise." Considering the fact Nimoy is having to convincingly and heavily emote—while clutching at throbbing bladders of spray-painted foam—really shows his range. Meanwhile, the irascible DeForest Kelley gets in several Bones-ian lines such as, "I'm a doctor, not a bricklayer!" while barking orders to a junior officer on the ship, and questioning Spock's theses, at the same time simultaneously giving us clues to the mystery through cool-headed forensic talk. And this specific scene—where Shatner discovers the main clutch of Horta eggs—he's staring up into the ceiling of a sound stage. But has to make the audience think he's just seen the most astounding sight imaginable, which suddenly makes him realize just what it is the Horta's been killing for in the first place. Ken Lynch is terrific as Chief Vanderberg, and had an extensive credits history through film and television. A very comfortably familiar face who absolutely sells himself as the production-minded miners' boss. Miner Schmitter (Bill Elliott) likewise had a healthy list of credits, and was important in his brief but key portrayal of a working blue-collar man facing annihilation at the hands of the monster. Security Chief Giotto (John Duke, aka: Barry Russo) would later appear as Commodore Wesley in TOS episode, "The Ultimate Computer." And like Elliott and Lynch, had quite a run of credits. Unlike some other TOS outings, there really isn't much to complain about with this one. The scripting is tight, the plot advances smoothly, the anticipation (as well as horror) is real, and the solution at the end proves quite satisfying. And once again we have clear, undeniable proof that the Federation is not a moneyless utopia, much to the chagrin of Marxist Trekkies. Kirk remarks that Vanderberg and his men are going to be embarrassingly rich once the hatched Horta get going. Likewise, the other colonies depending on Janus VI for rare ores (like the fictional Pergium) are clearly *paying* for the stuff. And any delay in mining or shipping poses a big enough threat to the function of those colonies that Starfleet Command detours the Enterprise to investigate and solve the issue. Thus the economy surrounding the mining is integral to the plot, and inseparable from the worldbuilding. I love this episode. Start to finish. Again, Top 5 for TOS in my book.

Brad R. Torgersen

22,282 views • 3 months ago

A Watch and Investment Story I have been a watch enthusiast since my dad got me interested in watches decades ago. About three years ago, I was in London and walked by a watch boutique called Bremont. I stepped into the store, fell in love with the watches, thought they were fairly priced if not somewhat inexpensive for the quality, and bought a number of them as gifts for friends and one for myself. As I was completing the purchases, I asked the store manager: ‘Who owns the company?’ He said, “The English brothers” – Nick and Giles English – and then he proceeded to tell me Bremont’s origin story that begins with a tragic plane crash of a 1942 Harvard trainer aircraft (an American plane purchased by the British beginning in 1938) which killed their father and almost Nick. In their ‘What does not kill me makes me stronger’ new world, Nick and Giles were inspired to pursue their dream of creating and building a British watch company, and Bremont thereafter was born. The manager gave me their contact information and I sent an email congratulating the brothers on the company, the brand, and the watches. I also offered to invest and help the business grow. Sometime later, I did a Zoom with Nick. He explained that my timing was good, as a long-time investor in the company was looking to sell some of their shares. Within a couple of months, an affiliate of mine invested coinciding with the purchase by a legacy Bremont shareholder of primary shares to provide the company with additional growth capital. I thereafter bought more shares of stock from other selling shareholders and I invested a substantial amount of additional growth capital in the company just this past week. Affiliates of mine and The Bremont Long Term Trust, a trust I recently established, now own 63% of the company. Bremont is a luxury British watch company that produces adventure and exploration watches. About one-fourth of Bremont’s sales are to the military, where the company has made custom-designed watches for more than 500 British, U.S., and other American ally squadrons around the world. While today there are very few British watch companies, the British actually created the watch industry – Rolex, notably, was a British company before it moved to Switzerland – with many of the most important technical innovations and complications of the industry having been invented in England in the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries. For the watch industry, the Swiss can be thought of like the Japanese of the U.S. auto industry, where in the early days, the Swiss made cheap imitations of British watches, but eventually by the 20th century, came to dominate the industry. For compliance reasons, I have been limited in my personal investments to private situations, principally startups, real estate, and private equity, directly and through funds. Because of my personal time limitations, I spend very little time on these investments, but through a combination of good luck, investment experience, and a good eye for talent, my collective private investment outcomes have been excellent, with a few huge successes outweighing some disappointments. I have always viewed my non-Pershing Square investments as an opportunity for learning and insights that I can apply to my day job. For example, I have found that closely following the venture investment world has provided important insights into disruptive technologies and companies that can soon become serious threats to even the largest and best capitalized public companies. Experiences at small companies also very often apply to big ones, so in my hobby of making personal investments, my returns have been both financial and educational, from my successes and from my failures. Other than tennis, I don’t have any real hobbies, but perhaps my personal investing qualifies as my second passion. To date, I have been a passive investor in Bremont, but perhaps the activist in me caused me to step forward, to recently seize the opportunity to materially increase my investment in the company, and become the non-executive chairman of a newly refreshed board. I don’t expect my chairman role at Bremont to take much of my time as it is a private company of limited scale, but I do expect my experience here will provide some helpful learnings and insights. I also thought it would be fun, interesting, and rewarding to take the X community along for the ride – at least those that are interested in watches, operations, and investing. I intend to provide periodic updates of the company’s progress on X, about our successes, our struggles, and our failures – so that we can learn and have some fun together. Think of my periodic updates as “Drive to Survive,” but for watches on X. “Time to Succeed”? You can probably come up with a better name for the series, and perhaps then I should reach out to Netflix to see if they are interested (while holding back my tears as I have watched the stock massively appreciate since our exit!). Bremont can greatly benefit by your feedback so I strongly encourage you to share your insights, critiques, and other ideas about the company and its watches on X so we can learn and improve. We will periodically award the best ideas with Bremont watches so you can have an opportunity to earn an appropriate in-kind return on your time invested in helping us succeed. In the modern era, building an independent watch company into a major company, let alone one in the U.K., has rarely if ever occurred. The watch world is littered with many such failed attempts so it is far from guaranteed that we will succeed in building a profitable and sustainable company, let alone a major independent player. My Investment History to Date with Bremont Prior to my investment in the company, Nick and Giles had taken Bremont to a reasonable scale for an independently owned watch company at about £21 million in revenues with a modest operating loss, which is an incredible accomplishment for two young men with no watch industry experience. Nick and Giles accomplishment is particularly significant in an extremely competitive industry characterized by well capitalized incumbents that control many of the top brands, e.g., Richemont, Swatch, LVMH, as well dominant, independently owned companies like Rolex, Patek Philippe, Audemars and Piguet, and a few others. Despite their progress, both Nick and Giles and the other shareholders agreed that bringing in an executive with watch industry experience would help to take the company to the next level. Shortly after I invested, we hired a search firm to identify and ultimately recruit our new CEO, Davide Cerrato, who joined in May of 2023. Davide’s entire career has been spent in the industry at Panerai, Tudor – where he famously created the Black Bay, Montblanc, and with a brief stent at HYT. Davide in turn hired other industry notables to round out the executive suite, and then the team went to work with the ambitious goal of transforming Bremont into a global industry leader. Bremont has some important competitive advantages. First and most importantly, the watches are handsome, extremely well designed, and overengineered. Davide’s team has materially upgraded materials (for example, the company now uses 904L steel for all of its steel watches – the same as Rolex – unprecedented for watches at Bremont’s price point), parts, and movements from what was already a good standard to a level comparable to watches at multiples of the price. The watches are developed, designed, manufactured, and serviced in Henley-on-Thames using principally Swiss movements. While making its own movement is an aspirational goal for Bremont, the Swiss still make the highest quality movements so that is what Bremont uses. Bremont has a unique brand story and heritage, particularly for a 23-year-old company, with two decades of credibility in war zones and air combat missions with the best war fighters and military pilots in the world. Bremont also makes a limited number of watches, around 10,000 per year, compared with more than 1.2 million for Rolex and 70,000 for Patek Philippe, and scarcity drives value in luxury goods. The combination of battlefield credibility, rarity, quality and a fair price make Bremont an extremely attractive alternative to the typical Rolex or Patek, which everyone seems to be wearing in my industry, a ubiquity in my view that loses its luster over time. Over the past 23 months, Davide and team have redesigned and focused Bremont’s range around three core offerings in Land, Sea, and Air – the Terra Nova, the Supermarine, and the Altitude – while upgrading materials, movements, and quality, updating the logo to reflect the new Land and Sea offerings (Bremont was previously perceived to only be an aviation brand), and dramatically improving manufacturing and service. The company has extended its warranty from three to five years on its new watches reflecting these improvements. Bremont benefits from having overinvested in its spectacular 35,000 square foot combined headquarters, manufacturing facility, and showroom in Henley-on-Thames, aka “The Wing” (email tours@bremont.com to arrange a superb tour), with the capacity for substantial growth without the requirement for incremental capital investment. Lastly, Bremont now has a well-capitalized long-term major owner who would like to see Bremont become a big success and achieve its vision of returning watchmaking to the UK, and who is not looking for dividends or a liquidity event in this lifetime. I have learned over time that permanent capital and a truly long-term orientation are enormous competitive advantages for any business, and they should be very helpful here. With respect to the product, later this morning in Geneva at Watches and Wonders, the industry’s most important trade show, the company is launching its new Altitude aviation line, which builds from the company’s highly successful Martin Baker offerings. The company will also be introducing some complicated new watches including two unique, jumping hour models, a 12-piece new tourbillion model (the company's first 30-piece tourbillion watch sold out shortly after its launch last year), and the company’s first perpetual calendar (limited to 50 pieces). I will be back with further updates as we continue to make progress. In the meantime, please check out and visit the Wing (Tours@bremont.com ) and our boutiques in Mayfair and throughout the U.K., on Madison Avenue and 53rd Street, in Hong Kong, and in Melbourne. Pictures don’t do Bremonts justice so you should go in person and tell the store manager that I sent you. Also, please take a look at our new launch video, and don't forget to let me know what you think.
0:45

A Watch and Investment Story I have been a watch enthusiast since my dad got me interested in watches decades ago. About three years ago, I was in London and walked by a watch boutique called Bremont. I stepped into the store, fell in love with the watches, thought they were fairly priced if not somewhat inexpensive for the quality, and bought a number of them as gifts for friends and one for myself. As I was completing the purchases, I asked the store manager: ‘Who owns the company?’ He said, “The English brothers” – Nick and Giles English – and then he proceeded to tell me Bremont’s origin story that begins with a tragic plane crash of a 1942 Harvard trainer aircraft (an American plane purchased by the British beginning in 1938) which killed their father and almost Nick. In their ‘What does not kill me makes me stronger’ new world, Nick and Giles were inspired to pursue their dream of creating and building a British watch company, and Bremont thereafter was born. The manager gave me their contact information and I sent an email congratulating the brothers on the company, the brand, and the watches. I also offered to invest and help the business grow. Sometime later, I did a Zoom with Nick. He explained that my timing was good, as a long-time investor in the company was looking to sell some of their shares. Within a couple of months, an affiliate of mine invested coinciding with the purchase by a legacy Bremont shareholder of primary shares to provide the company with additional growth capital. I thereafter bought more shares of stock from other selling shareholders and I invested a substantial amount of additional growth capital in the company just this past week. Affiliates of mine and The Bremont Long Term Trust, a trust I recently established, now own 63% of the company. Bremont is a luxury British watch company that produces adventure and exploration watches. About one-fourth of Bremont’s sales are to the military, where the company has made custom-designed watches for more than 500 British, U.S., and other American ally squadrons around the world. While today there are very few British watch companies, the British actually created the watch industry – Rolex, notably, was a British company before it moved to Switzerland – with many of the most important technical innovations and complications of the industry having been invented in England in the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries. For the watch industry, the Swiss can be thought of like the Japanese of the U.S. auto industry, where in the early days, the Swiss made cheap imitations of British watches, but eventually by the 20th century, came to dominate the industry. For compliance reasons, I have been limited in my personal investments to private situations, principally startups, real estate, and private equity, directly and through funds. Because of my personal time limitations, I spend very little time on these investments, but through a combination of good luck, investment experience, and a good eye for talent, my collective private investment outcomes have been excellent, with a few huge successes outweighing some disappointments. I have always viewed my non-Pershing Square investments as an opportunity for learning and insights that I can apply to my day job. For example, I have found that closely following the venture investment world has provided important insights into disruptive technologies and companies that can soon become serious threats to even the largest and best capitalized public companies. Experiences at small companies also very often apply to big ones, so in my hobby of making personal investments, my returns have been both financial and educational, from my successes and from my failures. Other than tennis, I don’t have any real hobbies, but perhaps my personal investing qualifies as my second passion. To date, I have been a passive investor in Bremont, but perhaps the activist in me caused me to step forward, to recently seize the opportunity to materially increase my investment in the company, and become the non-executive chairman of a newly refreshed board. I don’t expect my chairman role at Bremont to take much of my time as it is a private company of limited scale, but I do expect my experience here will provide some helpful learnings and insights. I also thought it would be fun, interesting, and rewarding to take the X community along for the ride – at least those that are interested in watches, operations, and investing. I intend to provide periodic updates of the company’s progress on X, about our successes, our struggles, and our failures – so that we can learn and have some fun together. Think of my periodic updates as “Drive to Survive,” but for watches on X. “Time to Succeed”? You can probably come up with a better name for the series, and perhaps then I should reach out to Netflix to see if they are interested (while holding back my tears as I have watched the stock massively appreciate since our exit!). Bremont can greatly benefit by your feedback so I strongly encourage you to share your insights, critiques, and other ideas about the company and its watches on X so we can learn and improve. We will periodically award the best ideas with Bremont watches so you can have an opportunity to earn an appropriate in-kind return on your time invested in helping us succeed. In the modern era, building an independent watch company into a major company, let alone one in the U.K., has rarely if ever occurred. The watch world is littered with many such failed attempts so it is far from guaranteed that we will succeed in building a profitable and sustainable company, let alone a major independent player. My Investment History to Date with Bremont Prior to my investment in the company, Nick and Giles had taken Bremont to a reasonable scale for an independently owned watch company at about £21 million in revenues with a modest operating loss, which is an incredible accomplishment for two young men with no watch industry experience. Nick and Giles accomplishment is particularly significant in an extremely competitive industry characterized by well capitalized incumbents that control many of the top brands, e.g., Richemont, Swatch, LVMH, as well dominant, independently owned companies like Rolex, Patek Philippe, Audemars and Piguet, and a few others. Despite their progress, both Nick and Giles and the other shareholders agreed that bringing in an executive with watch industry experience would help to take the company to the next level. Shortly after I invested, we hired a search firm to identify and ultimately recruit our new CEO, Davide Cerrato, who joined in May of 2023. Davide’s entire career has been spent in the industry at Panerai, Tudor – where he famously created the Black Bay, Montblanc, and with a brief stent at HYT. Davide in turn hired other industry notables to round out the executive suite, and then the team went to work with the ambitious goal of transforming Bremont into a global industry leader. Bremont has some important competitive advantages. First and most importantly, the watches are handsome, extremely well designed, and overengineered. Davide’s team has materially upgraded materials (for example, the company now uses 904L steel for all of its steel watches – the same as Rolex – unprecedented for watches at Bremont’s price point), parts, and movements from what was already a good standard to a level comparable to watches at multiples of the price. The watches are developed, designed, manufactured, and serviced in Henley-on-Thames using principally Swiss movements. While making its own movement is an aspirational goal for Bremont, the Swiss still make the highest quality movements so that is what Bremont uses. Bremont has a unique brand story and heritage, particularly for a 23-year-old company, with two decades of credibility in war zones and air combat missions with the best war fighters and military pilots in the world. Bremont also makes a limited number of watches, around 10,000 per year, compared with more than 1.2 million for Rolex and 70,000 for Patek Philippe, and scarcity drives value in luxury goods. The combination of battlefield credibility, rarity, quality and a fair price make Bremont an extremely attractive alternative to the typical Rolex or Patek, which everyone seems to be wearing in my industry, a ubiquity in my view that loses its luster over time. Over the past 23 months, Davide and team have redesigned and focused Bremont’s range around three core offerings in Land, Sea, and Air – the Terra Nova, the Supermarine, and the Altitude – while upgrading materials, movements, and quality, updating the logo to reflect the new Land and Sea offerings (Bremont was previously perceived to only be an aviation brand), and dramatically improving manufacturing and service. The company has extended its warranty from three to five years on its new watches reflecting these improvements. Bremont benefits from having overinvested in its spectacular 35,000 square foot combined headquarters, manufacturing facility, and showroom in Henley-on-Thames, aka “The Wing” (email [email protected] to arrange a superb tour), with the capacity for substantial growth without the requirement for incremental capital investment. Lastly, Bremont now has a well-capitalized long-term major owner who would like to see Bremont become a big success and achieve its vision of returning watchmaking to the UK, and who is not looking for dividends or a liquidity event in this lifetime. I have learned over time that permanent capital and a truly long-term orientation are enormous competitive advantages for any business, and they should be very helpful here. With respect to the product, later this morning in Geneva at Watches and Wonders, the industry’s most important trade show, the company is launching its new Altitude aviation line, which builds from the company’s highly successful Martin Baker offerings. The company will also be introducing some complicated new watches including two unique, jumping hour models, a 12-piece new tourbillion model (the company's first 30-piece tourbillion watch sold out shortly after its launch last year), and the company’s first perpetual calendar (limited to 50 pieces). I will be back with further updates as we continue to make progress. In the meantime, please check out and visit the Wing ([email protected] ) and our boutiques in Mayfair and throughout the U.K., on Madison Avenue and 53rd Street, in Hong Kong, and in Melbourne. Pictures don’t do Bremonts justice so you should go in person and tell the store manager that I sent you. Also, please take a look at our new launch video, and don't forget to let me know what you think.

Bill Ackman

1,625,902 views • 1 year ago

Masterful takedown by Dominique de Villepin, former French Prime Minister, of Macron's utterly irresponsible rhetoric on sending NATO ground troops to Ukraine (Villepin himself calls it irresponsible). I translated it in full, because I think it's so important people are aware of the extreme danger behind Macron's (and some other NATO leaders) attempt to escalate the conflict: "For this debate [over sending ground troops] to have been useful, it would have first been necessary for us to be able to answer 5 questions. Five risks associated with this escalation, this step we would be taking if we were to send ground troops, send fighters. Five risks. The first is the expansion of the conflict. If we send ground troops, do we know if on the Russian side others will send, on the other side, ground troops? Will we face African fighters, will we face Asian fighters, will we face Middle Eastern fighters in this global south that also wants to take on the West? First risk. [Host comments: This does not seem to me a favored scenario...] If Westerners, Europeans, French send troops there, don't you think that solidarity will also play on the Russian side? I think we still need to ask ourselves that question. In any case, our diplomacy has not done what it should have to isolate Russia. If Russia were isolated, we would know it... I think, by the way, that we are more isolated, unfortunately, than Russia. Second major question: new front. Risk of a new front. I warned, I was among the few voices to say 'be careful, Ukraine is a dangerous situation but what happens if another front opens?'. The front in Gaza and the Middle East has opened. But there are other fronts that can open: in Korea, in Africa... And so, are we going to wage war like this on all 5 continents? This reality must be taken into account: the world is not limited to the drama and tragedy of Ukraine. It turns out that America is a global power and that we claim to be a global power too, so we are concerned by the major balances and the order of the world, and unfortunately our diplomacy does not sufficiently take into account these disorders which concern the Congolese, the Sudanese, etc. Third risk which is important: the terrorist risk. I am not thinking of terrorism that would come from our opponents in Ukraine, I am thinking of opportunistic terrorism. When there are situations of this type of disorder, terrorism strikes. And I remind you: we have planned here in France not a year of war, but a year of celebrations. In a few months, we will commemorate the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landings and delegations will come from all over the world. We are going to spend several months celebrating the Olympics. If we need to mobilize, let's mobilize, but maybe it should have been done a bit more: I don't see a war economy, the preparation of minds in terms of civil defense and hybrid warfare, I see nothing... You don't just pull the idea of going to war in Ukraine out of a hat without having prepared a little... Fourth risk: we are on the eve of an American election that will determine the new world order. It's a safe bet that we are heading for a new era of isolationism and protectionism like the world has never seen. We are seeing a split in this new world order between Trump and a China that has just celebrated the reunion of its parliament and is becoming more introverted, more focused on its security than ever. This is a general global context that must be taken into account. And then there's one last element that may be one of the most important, which is the nuclear risk. I know the good experts, the great experts who speak on this subject and I respect them immensely. But sending ground troops, fighters, places us in a situation in terms of deterrence that we have never known. Forty years of Cold War: the forces of the Warsaw Pact and NATO forces never clashed. And it's not by chance: it's because of a reality that relates to the grammar of nuclear. The rule of deterrence is based on the principle of mutual assured destruction. That is, if one uses the bomb and the other responds, we're all dead. [...] I think the nuclear grammar means that today the risk of NATO ground troops in Ukraine presents a risk and that this risk, for responsible powers, is unacceptable. I travel enough around the world to have observed something for 15 years: the use of nuclear weapons is based on political cultures, societal cultures, and civilizations. The world is changing and what seemed unthinkable 10 or 15 years ago appears today differently: the rhetoric of the enemy, the hatred of the other, has developed to a point where we live in an international community that may want to settle scores with the other. [...] Today, and I'm not just thinking of the Russians, let's not forget nuclear proliferation with countries like Pakistan and many others that now have nuclear weapons. And it is in this that the principle of responsibility is essential, and there is a rule that must be drawn from all this: the logic of force, when not controlled, leads to an escalation that can be deadly. This is what makes the situation in Ukraine a real danger and it's also what makes - because this principle of the logic of uncontrolled force I would gladly apply to the situation in Gaza - it's what makes the Israeli policy applied today to Gaza a real danger. Because there is no control over the use of force. And when you look [...] all fronts are linked, all crises are linked."
7:37

Masterful takedown by Dominique de Villepin, former French Prime Minister, of Macron's utterly irresponsible rhetoric on sending NATO ground troops to Ukraine (Villepin himself calls it irresponsible). I translated it in full, because I think it's so important people are aware of the extreme danger behind Macron's (and some other NATO leaders) attempt to escalate the conflict: "For this debate [over sending ground troops] to have been useful, it would have first been necessary for us to be able to answer 5 questions. Five risks associated with this escalation, this step we would be taking if we were to send ground troops, send fighters. Five risks. The first is the expansion of the conflict. If we send ground troops, do we know if on the Russian side others will send, on the other side, ground troops? Will we face African fighters, will we face Asian fighters, will we face Middle Eastern fighters in this global south that also wants to take on the West? First risk. [Host comments: This does not seem to me a favored scenario...] If Westerners, Europeans, French send troops there, don't you think that solidarity will also play on the Russian side? I think we still need to ask ourselves that question. In any case, our diplomacy has not done what it should have to isolate Russia. If Russia were isolated, we would know it... I think, by the way, that we are more isolated, unfortunately, than Russia. Second major question: new front. Risk of a new front. I warned, I was among the few voices to say 'be careful, Ukraine is a dangerous situation but what happens if another front opens?'. The front in Gaza and the Middle East has opened. But there are other fronts that can open: in Korea, in Africa... And so, are we going to wage war like this on all 5 continents? This reality must be taken into account: the world is not limited to the drama and tragedy of Ukraine. It turns out that America is a global power and that we claim to be a global power too, so we are concerned by the major balances and the order of the world, and unfortunately our diplomacy does not sufficiently take into account these disorders which concern the Congolese, the Sudanese, etc. Third risk which is important: the terrorist risk. I am not thinking of terrorism that would come from our opponents in Ukraine, I am thinking of opportunistic terrorism. When there are situations of this type of disorder, terrorism strikes. And I remind you: we have planned here in France not a year of war, but a year of celebrations. In a few months, we will commemorate the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landings and delegations will come from all over the world. We are going to spend several months celebrating the Olympics. If we need to mobilize, let's mobilize, but maybe it should have been done a bit more: I don't see a war economy, the preparation of minds in terms of civil defense and hybrid warfare, I see nothing... You don't just pull the idea of going to war in Ukraine out of a hat without having prepared a little... Fourth risk: we are on the eve of an American election that will determine the new world order. It's a safe bet that we are heading for a new era of isolationism and protectionism like the world has never seen. We are seeing a split in this new world order between Trump and a China that has just celebrated the reunion of its parliament and is becoming more introverted, more focused on its security than ever. This is a general global context that must be taken into account. And then there's one last element that may be one of the most important, which is the nuclear risk. I know the good experts, the great experts who speak on this subject and I respect them immensely. But sending ground troops, fighters, places us in a situation in terms of deterrence that we have never known. Forty years of Cold War: the forces of the Warsaw Pact and NATO forces never clashed. And it's not by chance: it's because of a reality that relates to the grammar of nuclear. The rule of deterrence is based on the principle of mutual assured destruction. That is, if one uses the bomb and the other responds, we're all dead. [...] I think the nuclear grammar means that today the risk of NATO ground troops in Ukraine presents a risk and that this risk, for responsible powers, is unacceptable. I travel enough around the world to have observed something for 15 years: the use of nuclear weapons is based on political cultures, societal cultures, and civilizations. The world is changing and what seemed unthinkable 10 or 15 years ago appears today differently: the rhetoric of the enemy, the hatred of the other, has developed to a point where we live in an international community that may want to settle scores with the other. [...] Today, and I'm not just thinking of the Russians, let's not forget nuclear proliferation with countries like Pakistan and many others that now have nuclear weapons. And it is in this that the principle of responsibility is essential, and there is a rule that must be drawn from all this: the logic of force, when not controlled, leads to an escalation that can be deadly. This is what makes the situation in Ukraine a real danger and it's also what makes - because this principle of the logic of uncontrolled force I would gladly apply to the situation in Gaza - it's what makes the Israeli policy applied today to Gaza a real danger. Because there is no control over the use of force. And when you look [...] all fronts are linked, all crises are linked."

Arnaud Bertrand

846,373 views • 2 years ago

I SMASH all of you! Listen carefully now — I have testified in court in the Southern District of New York against some of the most dangerous Russian oligarchs in the world. One of them had according to rumours over a thousand kills, and the prosecutor in Spain handling his case was the most protected person in the country. I exposed in court the largest cocaine trafficking operation in the world, involving people who eat El Chapo for lunch. By the way, El Chapo was in the same housing unit as me in 2019 while I was talking with the FBI and prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. The law enforcement team assigned to protect me during this time, refused to escort me unless every inch of the area had been searched by K9 dogs for explosives. I survived two assassination attempts. For 15 years, I was the bank agent for the worst of the worst, making their money completely clean and safe in Luxembourg, Switzerland, Dubai, Singapore and Sweden etc. I was in court over billions of dollars, where Wes Watson’s Bugatti was a couple of weeks’ legal fees — his little boys and their cars are nothing but peanuts in my world. Frankly, no real man even drives a car — we have drivers and travel in a motorcade. I haven’t driven a car for the last 10 years. There isn’t a single ounce of fear that any so-called American gangster with a couple of kills can put in my body — they are nothing but a laughing stock to me. The people I fought would vaporize any criminal gang in America, along with their entire family tree in a heartbeat. That’s how dangerous and hardcore they are. And that’s exactly why the last thing these men would ever do is expose their children or love partners online like the extremely weak, crying babies #WesWatson and #AndrewTate do all day long. This is the world I come from, I am everything; they are nothing. The flipside of the coin: After all my legal challenges ended in 2021, I made deals and am cool today with the Russians, the Turks and the cocaine people. I have insurances in place— information that would unleash hell if anything ever happened to me. So, I’m untouchable now. But listen closely — I handle my problems like a real man. For example, in 2021 I met with a guy who handles business for the Russian oligarchs in the U.S. We met at a coffee shop in LA — he came with his people, and I came with my heavily armed security. He sat down, put a plastic bag on the table, slipped his hand inside and the first thing he said was that he had a gun pointed at me. I looked him in the eye and said, “Pull the trigger.” Then I explained — if he did, it would have turned the scene into the biggest bloodbath LA had ever seen. There were more guns in that place than the entire SWAT team would have had. He explained who and why they killed my former client, Russian oligarch Dmitry Bosov, whose death was officially ruled a homicide. We talked for some time, and since then I have honored my promise and they have honored theirs. I followed a similar procedure with the other people I was forced to call out in court. That’s how real men handle problems — we face them head-on, never back down. And if someone from my world truly wants to take someone out, they don’t just go after the individual — they eliminate their entire family tree so there’s nothing left. Finally: I take orders from only two people in this world. My full loyalty is with President Trump and his great son, Barron Trump. I am their greatest warrior, and I will give my life in this fight to Make America Great, so their names will live for eternity. - Victor X 🇺🇸 #MAGA #Trump #DonaldJTrump #BarronTrump
1:01

I SMASH all of you! Listen carefully now — I have testified in court in the Southern District of New York against some of the most dangerous Russian oligarchs in the world. One of them had according to rumours over a thousand kills, and the prosecutor in Spain handling his case was the most protected person in the country. I exposed in court the largest cocaine trafficking operation in the world, involving people who eat El Chapo for lunch. By the way, El Chapo was in the same housing unit as me in 2019 while I was talking with the FBI and prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. The law enforcement team assigned to protect me during this time, refused to escort me unless every inch of the area had been searched by K9 dogs for explosives. I survived two assassination attempts. For 15 years, I was the bank agent for the worst of the worst, making their money completely clean and safe in Luxembourg, Switzerland, Dubai, Singapore and Sweden etc. I was in court over billions of dollars, where Wes Watson’s Bugatti was a couple of weeks’ legal fees — his little boys and their cars are nothing but peanuts in my world. Frankly, no real man even drives a car — we have drivers and travel in a motorcade. I haven’t driven a car for the last 10 years. There isn’t a single ounce of fear that any so-called American gangster with a couple of kills can put in my body — they are nothing but a laughing stock to me. The people I fought would vaporize any criminal gang in America, along with their entire family tree in a heartbeat. That’s how dangerous and hardcore they are. And that’s exactly why the last thing these men would ever do is expose their children or love partners online like the extremely weak, crying babies #WesWatson and #AndrewTate do all day long. This is the world I come from, I am everything; they are nothing. The flipside of the coin: After all my legal challenges ended in 2021, I made deals and am cool today with the Russians, the Turks and the cocaine people. I have insurances in place— information that would unleash hell if anything ever happened to me. So, I’m untouchable now. But listen closely — I handle my problems like a real man. For example, in 2021 I met with a guy who handles business for the Russian oligarchs in the U.S. We met at a coffee shop in LA — he came with his people, and I came with my heavily armed security. He sat down, put a plastic bag on the table, slipped his hand inside and the first thing he said was that he had a gun pointed at me. I looked him in the eye and said, “Pull the trigger.” Then I explained — if he did, it would have turned the scene into the biggest bloodbath LA had ever seen. There were more guns in that place than the entire SWAT team would have had. He explained who and why they killed my former client, Russian oligarch Dmitry Bosov, whose death was officially ruled a homicide. We talked for some time, and since then I have honored my promise and they have honored theirs. I followed a similar procedure with the other people I was forced to call out in court. That’s how real men handle problems — we face them head-on, never back down. And if someone from my world truly wants to take someone out, they don’t just go after the individual — they eliminate their entire family tree so there’s nothing left. Finally: I take orders from only two people in this world. My full loyalty is with President Trump and his great son, Barron Trump. I am their greatest warrior, and I will give my life in this fight to Make America Great, so their names will live for eternity. - Victor X 🇺🇸 #MAGA #Trump #DonaldJTrump #BarronTrump

Victor X

810,571 views • 1 year ago

Did Mary Sheffield Violate City Ethics in Fling With Suspended Demo Contractor? She and Brian McKinney may have been “just getting to know each other,” but the mayoral candidate voted to award him huge contracts By Charlie LeDuff Charlie LeDuff Detroit — Detroit City Council President Mary Sheffield—the leading candidate in next week's mayoral election—carried on an intimate relationship and took at least one trip with a contractor who was awarded tens of millions of dollars from the city since 2017, a Sheffield aide confirms. Sheffield never disclosed the relationship or the trip, nor recused herself from voting on those contracts, the aide confirmed in a written statement. “They were getting to know each other but weren’t in a committed relationship while he had business before City Council,” wrote Brian White, chief of staff for Council President Sheffield. “However, because she had no pecuniary or financial interest in the contracts or matters before Council, she was obligated to vote when present.” That statement flies in the face of city rules and ethical standards, however. The city ethics ordinance clearly states: “A public servant shall not accept gifts, gratuities, honoria, or other things of value from any person or company doing business or seeking to do business with the city.” Then there is Executive Order 2012-1: “Any employee, as defined in this Executive Order, who exercises significant authority over a contract is prohibited from having a personal relationship with the contractor or any person who provides goods or services to the City of Detroit under the contract.” (A city councilperson is defined as an employee under the executive order.) According to the 2019 Board of Ethics annual report, Sheffield asked in early April about disclosure requirements for a personal relationship. The board advised that the public servant “should exercise caution that her/his judgment and action on behalf of the City remain independent, and refrain from sharing any confidential information with any outside entity.” Making the situation more odious, the contractor with whom Sheffield had the relationship is the subject of a sprawling criminal investigation into whether he bilked the city and poisoned the people. Brian McKinney, owner of the Gayanga demolition company, stands accused of using toxic dirt from the old Northland Mall and other sites and dumping it into demolition holes in the city of Detroit. McKinney was suspended last month from further work in the city of Detroit pending a final determination from the Office of the Inspector General. McKinney, whose career in Detroit was nurtured by current Mayor Mike Duggan, received at least $64 million in city contracts since 2017, demolishing nearly 2,500 abandoned houses. According to city council minutes reviewed by Michigan Enjoyer, Sheffield has voted every single year on McKinney contracts. McKinney, who did not respond to requests for comment, has contributed more than $13,000 to various Sheffield campaign funds over the past year, according to the Detroit Free Press. The nature of the relationship between the politician and demolisher came to light by way of an anonymous letter. That letter detailed an April 2019 trip to Miami and a weekend stay at the Four Seasons hotel, where a standard room costs more than $500 a night. “She doesn’t recall the specifics of the trip which took place over six years ago,” wrote Sheffield’s chief of staff. “However, in our opinion, the details of her private life in this instance are inconsequential because she did not have a duty to disclose or recuse herself from any vote based on the City’s Ethics Ordinance and the advice she sought and received.” The ethics ordinance clearly states: “All public servants and contractors must be vigilant in promoting and safeguarding ethical practices in the conduct of government business.” If Sheffield is elected mayor, she will join an inglorious list of predecessors who comingled public funds and private relationships. Kwame Kilpatrick was found guilty of perjury, which led to his resignation in 2008, after he lied under oath about an affair he had with his chief of staff. Mike Duggan was investigated for steering money to his former gal-pal and now wife and then destroying emails documenting the fact. The inspector general found that the Duggan administration had abused its office. Attorney General Dana Nessel declined to file criminal charges, however. Election day in Detroit is Nov. 4th.
3:49

Did Mary Sheffield Violate City Ethics in Fling With Suspended Demo Contractor? She and Brian McKinney may have been “just getting to know each other,” but the mayoral candidate voted to award him huge contracts By Charlie LeDuff Charlie LeDuff Detroit — Detroit City Council President Mary Sheffield—the leading candidate in next week's mayoral election—carried on an intimate relationship and took at least one trip with a contractor who was awarded tens of millions of dollars from the city since 2017, a Sheffield aide confirms. Sheffield never disclosed the relationship or the trip, nor recused herself from voting on those contracts, the aide confirmed in a written statement. “They were getting to know each other but weren’t in a committed relationship while he had business before City Council,” wrote Brian White, chief of staff for Council President Sheffield. “However, because she had no pecuniary or financial interest in the contracts or matters before Council, she was obligated to vote when present.” That statement flies in the face of city rules and ethical standards, however. The city ethics ordinance clearly states: “A public servant shall not accept gifts, gratuities, honoria, or other things of value from any person or company doing business or seeking to do business with the city.” Then there is Executive Order 2012-1: “Any employee, as defined in this Executive Order, who exercises significant authority over a contract is prohibited from having a personal relationship with the contractor or any person who provides goods or services to the City of Detroit under the contract.” (A city councilperson is defined as an employee under the executive order.) According to the 2019 Board of Ethics annual report, Sheffield asked in early April about disclosure requirements for a personal relationship. The board advised that the public servant “should exercise caution that her/his judgment and action on behalf of the City remain independent, and refrain from sharing any confidential information with any outside entity.” Making the situation more odious, the contractor with whom Sheffield had the relationship is the subject of a sprawling criminal investigation into whether he bilked the city and poisoned the people. Brian McKinney, owner of the Gayanga demolition company, stands accused of using toxic dirt from the old Northland Mall and other sites and dumping it into demolition holes in the city of Detroit. McKinney was suspended last month from further work in the city of Detroit pending a final determination from the Office of the Inspector General. McKinney, whose career in Detroit was nurtured by current Mayor Mike Duggan, received at least $64 million in city contracts since 2017, demolishing nearly 2,500 abandoned houses. According to city council minutes reviewed by Michigan Enjoyer, Sheffield has voted every single year on McKinney contracts. McKinney, who did not respond to requests for comment, has contributed more than $13,000 to various Sheffield campaign funds over the past year, according to the Detroit Free Press. The nature of the relationship between the politician and demolisher came to light by way of an anonymous letter. That letter detailed an April 2019 trip to Miami and a weekend stay at the Four Seasons hotel, where a standard room costs more than $500 a night. “She doesn’t recall the specifics of the trip which took place over six years ago,” wrote Sheffield’s chief of staff. “However, in our opinion, the details of her private life in this instance are inconsequential because she did not have a duty to disclose or recuse herself from any vote based on the City’s Ethics Ordinance and the advice she sought and received.” The ethics ordinance clearly states: “All public servants and contractors must be vigilant in promoting and safeguarding ethical practices in the conduct of government business.” If Sheffield is elected mayor, she will join an inglorious list of predecessors who comingled public funds and private relationships. Kwame Kilpatrick was found guilty of perjury, which led to his resignation in 2008, after he lied under oath about an affair he had with his chief of staff. Mike Duggan was investigated for steering money to his former gal-pal and now wife and then destroying emails documenting the fact. The inspector general found that the Duggan administration had abused its office. Attorney General Dana Nessel declined to file criminal charges, however. Election day in Detroit is Nov. 4th.

Michigan Enjoyer

14,364 views • 9 months ago

🚩RFK Jnr could have just handed NZ a wealth opportunity 1000 times better than Luxon’s crap India FTA. Will National & Labour to blow once in a lifetime opportunity to turbo charge our exports? The new dietary guidelines released by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on January 7, 2026, represents a once in a lifetime change in U.S. federal nutrition policy. The traditional food pyramid has been flipped to prioritise protein (red meat like steak and beef), full-fat dairy (such as whole milk and cheese), healthy fats, along with vegetables at the top. The guidelines explicitly encourage Americans to eat more "real food" and cut back on highly processed foods, added sugars, and refined grains. This overhaul is likely to drive up U.S. demand for dairy and red meat, the pyramid now has an emphasis on items like steak, ground beef (mince), and full-fat dairy could boost consumption further if adopted in federal programs like school lunches. For New Zealand exports, this could provide an unbelievable boost. NZ is a top global exporter of dairy (e.g., milk powder, cheese, butter) and red meat (beef and lamb), with the U.S. as a key market. The guidelines' focus on "whole, nutrient-dense" and minimally processed foods aligns well with NZ's grass-fed, pasture-raised products, which are often marketed as premium and natural alternatives to U.S. factory-farmed options. If U.S. demand rises, even with a strong push for domestic-only sourcing (not yet explicitly mentioned in the guidelines), NZ could still see massively increased export volumes and values because of our high-quality dairy and beef that fit the "real food" narrative, NZ has a ‘verifiable GE free’ status which sets us apart from Australia, Canada and Brazil. Last year our exports to the US was nearly $6 billion - with meat making up half that value. Last year we exported just over 500 million to India, with luxon floating we could see exports to India rise to $1.6 billion — over 15 YEARS. We could be selling more in meat to the US within 2 YEARS. Why is he intent on this crap deal with India, flooding us with immigrants and at the same time pushing GE and vaccinating cows in the name of “climate change” & ruining our premium product.? Because he’s a globalist Paris accord loving cuck. Watch Luxon talk garbage about reducing cows farting with experimental lab grass. Once we do this, there’s no going back.
2:56

🚩RFK Jnr could have just handed NZ a wealth opportunity 1000 times better than Luxon’s crap India FTA. Will National & Labour to blow once in a lifetime opportunity to turbo charge our exports? The new dietary guidelines released by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on January 7, 2026, represents a once in a lifetime change in U.S. federal nutrition policy. The traditional food pyramid has been flipped to prioritise protein (red meat like steak and beef), full-fat dairy (such as whole milk and cheese), healthy fats, along with vegetables at the top. The guidelines explicitly encourage Americans to eat more "real food" and cut back on highly processed foods, added sugars, and refined grains. This overhaul is likely to drive up U.S. demand for dairy and red meat, the pyramid now has an emphasis on items like steak, ground beef (mince), and full-fat dairy could boost consumption further if adopted in federal programs like school lunches. For New Zealand exports, this could provide an unbelievable boost. NZ is a top global exporter of dairy (e.g., milk powder, cheese, butter) and red meat (beef and lamb), with the U.S. as a key market. The guidelines' focus on "whole, nutrient-dense" and minimally processed foods aligns well with NZ's grass-fed, pasture-raised products, which are often marketed as premium and natural alternatives to U.S. factory-farmed options. If U.S. demand rises, even with a strong push for domestic-only sourcing (not yet explicitly mentioned in the guidelines), NZ could still see massively increased export volumes and values because of our high-quality dairy and beef that fit the "real food" narrative, NZ has a ‘verifiable GE free’ status which sets us apart from Australia, Canada and Brazil. Last year our exports to the US was nearly $6 billion - with meat making up half that value. Last year we exported just over 500 million to India, with luxon floating we could see exports to India rise to $1.6 billion — over 15 YEARS. We could be selling more in meat to the US within 2 YEARS. Why is he intent on this crap deal with India, flooding us with immigrants and at the same time pushing GE and vaccinating cows in the name of “climate change” & ruining our premium product.? Because he’s a globalist Paris accord loving cuck. Watch Luxon talk garbage about reducing cows farting with experimental lab grass. Once we do this, there’s no going back.

Holyhekatuiteka

19,478 views • 7 months ago

THE SOUND OF FREEDOM: Exposes The Pedophile Economy enslaving millions of innocent children around the world to a life of rape, torture and murder. Tim Ballard, former Homeland Security Special Agent confirms Adrenochrome is real. They take the children's blood and they drink it. The U.S. Department of Labor and the United Nations estimate that there are over 6 million innocent children who are forced into sex slavery, labor slavery and organ harvesting. It is absolutely a real thing. The United States is the number one consumer of child rape materials and close to number one in production. 85,000 unaccompanied minors were let into the United States and delivered to a Sponsor without the Sponsor being vetted, DNA checked or having a background check. Thousands were under the age of five. This is the Economy of Pedophilia in the United States. There are baby factories, real cases where they have kidnapped women as young as 13 year old children and impregnate them, they rape them and they make babies. Then they take these babies and sell them for their organs, sell them for sex and sell them for satanic ritual abuse. This is very real and it is really happening. Why is the Mainstream Media ignoring these horrific crimes? Tim Ballard says: I think it is because if there are 2 million children forced into commercial sex a lot of people are involved. There are people who don't want this exposed because they are involved in it. Tim Ballard goes on to say that there is something called Adrenochrome where they are taking the children's blood and devouring it. It is very real, they take these children, they take their organs, they take their blood and they drink it. They take the genitals of children and hang it over the rooftop of their businesses thinking the dark gods will bless them. These are real things happening to innocent children. Tim Ballard was with the CIA for one year and then transferred to the United States Homeland Security Investigations Division as an Undercover Special Agent. During his time with Homeland Security he was asked to join a newly formed Child Crimes Unit. During his first assignment in the Child Crimes Unit Tim was so shocked by what he saw, he would never be the same. In his first case in 2002 he was given VHS videos and hard drives that he had to look at. While explaining what he saw during this interview Tim holds back tears remembering the very first images he had to see. He saw three little boys, 7, 5 and 3 years old who looked like his own children, who were being raped by a Pedophile. He was so shocked, that he dropped to his knees and dry heaved in a waste basket thinking he was going to throw up. He suffers from PTSD (Post-traumatic stress disorder) because of seeing the horrors being done to innocent children. Child rape videos have increased by 5000 percent recently. After viewing these shocking images Tim Ballard could never see the world in the same way. He had to come to grips with the fact that there are millions of people who are Pedophiles, only millions of Pedophiles could justify a demand for millions of child exploitation materials and videos. Ernst Oshinsky the real Pedophile who was arrested in the Sound of Freedom movie had over 2 million pieces of child rape material in his house. Tim had to be confronted with the reality that there are millions of people on this planet who want to indulge in watching 5 year old children be raped and sexual assaulted in ways unimaginable. To watch children's bodies actually break in the act of sexual assault, acts that your mind couldn't imagine, but is real, is so shocking to the system it changes your life forever. When Tim Ballard says children's bodies actually break in the act of sexual assault he is referring to the pelvic bones of the innocent children breaking apart as a result of being brutally raped by an adult male. Children's bodies were not designed to be raped by an adult. This is the most horrific crime a child must endure. Pedophiles include all walks of life Tim says, he has arrested educators, lawyers, law enforcement and clergymen. These Pedophiles have normalized raping and torturing children. He says something has taken over them which scares him when he looks into their eyes. They believe their behavior is normal he says. Jim Caviezel says it wounds God in the greatest way when you take these innocent children who have done nothing, who have no sin and kill the most innocent. He goes on to say very emotionally that he hears the screams of these children in his heart because of the agents that he worked with. He was weeping so hard by the horrors of what he saw. He viewed this evidence because he had to know the pain and suffering of these children in order to share this truth with the world. He goes on to say the Media and the 3 letter agencies are not telling the truth. Jordan Peterson asks Jim Caviezel how has this movie changed you? Jim says "I would give my life in a heartbeat. I am less concerned about myself. I will tell you this right now, I would absolutely die, if this were to change the world and get rid of trafficking and pornography and all of the 8 arms of this Octopus that has to be destroyed. The only way you can destroy it, is to take the head off. If that happened, I would give my life in a heartbeat." The Head of this 8 armed Octopus that Jim Caviezel is talking about is the Committee of 300. A Scripture that Tim Ballard remembers and recites to help him stay strong and focused on his child trafficking rescue operations is "Better than a millstone be placed around your neck and you tossed to the bottom of the sea than you should hurt one of these little ones." God clearly stands against children being abused, raped, tortured and murdered. There is righteous violence coming to those who hurt children. Our innocent children are being targeted like never before Tim says. There are groups trying to get rid of the name Pedophile and call themselves Minor Attracted Persons. At the same time they are sexualizing children in schools, teachers are giving them pornography to read, things we used to be able to arrest them for in the past. Now children can consent to Transgender mutilation which will lead to children consenting to having sex with a Pedophile. Our culture is enslaving millions of children to a future life of rape and torture. If we do nothing to stop this, we are all guilty of these horrific crimes.
31:39

THE SOUND OF FREEDOM: Exposes The Pedophile Economy enslaving millions of innocent children around the world to a life of rape, torture and murder. Tim Ballard, former Homeland Security Special Agent confirms Adrenochrome is real. They take the children's blood and they drink it. The U.S. Department of Labor and the United Nations estimate that there are over 6 million innocent children who are forced into sex slavery, labor slavery and organ harvesting. It is absolutely a real thing. The United States is the number one consumer of child rape materials and close to number one in production. 85,000 unaccompanied minors were let into the United States and delivered to a Sponsor without the Sponsor being vetted, DNA checked or having a background check. Thousands were under the age of five. This is the Economy of Pedophilia in the United States. There are baby factories, real cases where they have kidnapped women as young as 13 year old children and impregnate them, they rape them and they make babies. Then they take these babies and sell them for their organs, sell them for sex and sell them for satanic ritual abuse. This is very real and it is really happening. Why is the Mainstream Media ignoring these horrific crimes? Tim Ballard says: I think it is because if there are 2 million children forced into commercial sex a lot of people are involved. There are people who don't want this exposed because they are involved in it. Tim Ballard goes on to say that there is something called Adrenochrome where they are taking the children's blood and devouring it. It is very real, they take these children, they take their organs, they take their blood and they drink it. They take the genitals of children and hang it over the rooftop of their businesses thinking the dark gods will bless them. These are real things happening to innocent children. Tim Ballard was with the CIA for one year and then transferred to the United States Homeland Security Investigations Division as an Undercover Special Agent. During his time with Homeland Security he was asked to join a newly formed Child Crimes Unit. During his first assignment in the Child Crimes Unit Tim was so shocked by what he saw, he would never be the same. In his first case in 2002 he was given VHS videos and hard drives that he had to look at. While explaining what he saw during this interview Tim holds back tears remembering the very first images he had to see. He saw three little boys, 7, 5 and 3 years old who looked like his own children, who were being raped by a Pedophile. He was so shocked, that he dropped to his knees and dry heaved in a waste basket thinking he was going to throw up. He suffers from PTSD (Post-traumatic stress disorder) because of seeing the horrors being done to innocent children. Child rape videos have increased by 5000 percent recently. After viewing these shocking images Tim Ballard could never see the world in the same way. He had to come to grips with the fact that there are millions of people who are Pedophiles, only millions of Pedophiles could justify a demand for millions of child exploitation materials and videos. Ernst Oshinsky the real Pedophile who was arrested in the Sound of Freedom movie had over 2 million pieces of child rape material in his house. Tim had to be confronted with the reality that there are millions of people on this planet who want to indulge in watching 5 year old children be raped and sexual assaulted in ways unimaginable. To watch children's bodies actually break in the act of sexual assault, acts that your mind couldn't imagine, but is real, is so shocking to the system it changes your life forever. When Tim Ballard says children's bodies actually break in the act of sexual assault he is referring to the pelvic bones of the innocent children breaking apart as a result of being brutally raped by an adult male. Children's bodies were not designed to be raped by an adult. This is the most horrific crime a child must endure. Pedophiles include all walks of life Tim says, he has arrested educators, lawyers, law enforcement and clergymen. These Pedophiles have normalized raping and torturing children. He says something has taken over them which scares him when he looks into their eyes. They believe their behavior is normal he says. Jim Caviezel says it wounds God in the greatest way when you take these innocent children who have done nothing, who have no sin and kill the most innocent. He goes on to say very emotionally that he hears the screams of these children in his heart because of the agents that he worked with. He was weeping so hard by the horrors of what he saw. He viewed this evidence because he had to know the pain and suffering of these children in order to share this truth with the world. He goes on to say the Media and the 3 letter agencies are not telling the truth. Jordan Peterson asks Jim Caviezel how has this movie changed you? Jim says "I would give my life in a heartbeat. I am less concerned about myself. I will tell you this right now, I would absolutely die, if this were to change the world and get rid of trafficking and pornography and all of the 8 arms of this Octopus that has to be destroyed. The only way you can destroy it, is to take the head off. If that happened, I would give my life in a heartbeat." The Head of this 8 armed Octopus that Jim Caviezel is talking about is the Committee of 300. A Scripture that Tim Ballard remembers and recites to help him stay strong and focused on his child trafficking rescue operations is "Better than a millstone be placed around your neck and you tossed to the bottom of the sea than you should hurt one of these little ones." God clearly stands against children being abused, raped, tortured and murdered. There is righteous violence coming to those who hurt children. Our innocent children are being targeted like never before Tim says. There are groups trying to get rid of the name Pedophile and call themselves Minor Attracted Persons. At the same time they are sexualizing children in schools, teachers are giving them pornography to read, things we used to be able to arrest them for in the past. Now children can consent to Transgender mutilation which will lead to children consenting to having sex with a Pedophile. Our culture is enslaving millions of children to a future life of rape and torture. If we do nothing to stop this, we are all guilty of these horrific crimes.

Truth Justice ™

4,014,637 views • 3 years ago

After Trump kidnapped Maduro on behalf of Pax Judaica, he turned his attention elsewhere. To Greenland. Trump has announced that they're considering using military force to take over Greenland. But surely his interest in Greenland is only about the interests of US Empire and not that of the transnational empire being developed by the Zionists? Think again. The entire power of the US military is now at the disposal of individual Zionist Oligarchs for whatever pet project they want. In this case the genocidal Jewish supremacist is Ronald Lauder. What is Lauder’s connection to Greenland? Here is Danish social scientist Steven N. Højlund (in the video below with extracts pasted here to). While Trump threatens to seize Greenland by force, a quieter takeover is already underway. And it's happening through the same billionaire who planted the idea in Trump's head Ronald Lauder. The same Lauder who convinced Trump to buy Greenland back in 2017, isn't just talking anymore. He's buying his way in, through a Delaware registered company called Greenland Development Partners. Lauder has quietly purchased stakes in strategic Greenlandic companies. But here's what nobody's reporting. His business partners in Greenland are some of Greenland's most influential people with very, very close ties to Greenland's foreign minister. That's the same person negotiating Greenland's response to Trump's threats. This is economic infiltration disguised as investment and I'm going to show you exactly how it works... This is the story the media isn't telling. Let me introduce you to Greenland Development Partners. It's a Delaware registered investment consortium. And if that sounds deliberately obscure, that's because it is. Delaware corporations are famous for one thing and that's opacity. Delaware is the shell company's capital of America where you can hide ownership structures and avoid scrutiny. According to Danish newspaper Politken's investigation, Lauder is a key participant in this consortium. And the consortium has bought stakes in two Greenlandic companies. One of these companies is called Greenland Water Bank: and it's owned by two Greenlandic businessmen, Svend Hardenberg and Jørgen Wæver Johansen. Hardenberg is a former top civil servant and top adviser to the prime minister of Greenland until he got fired recently. He was also the director of Greenland's National Energy Company. In other words, he knows the system inside and out. But Johansen is far more interesting. Johansen is a former minister in several Greenlandic governments and he currently chairs the governing Siumut party in Nuuk, Greenland's capital. Siumut is one of the four parties in Greenland's current coalition government. But that's not the real kicker. His wife is Vivian Motzfeldt, the foreign minister of Greenland. That's the person responsible for handling foreign relations, including relations with the United States. Just take a moment and think about what that means. Ronald Lauder, Trump's friend and adviser on Greenland, is now in business with the husband of Greenland's foreign minister. This isn't just investment. This is influence buying at the very highest level. And I will explain why that is the case. The company Greenland Water Bank, it sounds small and innocent, and it really is. In fact, in 2024, the company's accounts showed minimum staffing costs of only $5,500 and a modest financial loss. In other words, this is a very small company. Greenland Water Bank bottles water from the Lyngmark Spring [near the town of Qeqertarsuaq on Disko Island]…They sell the water locally in the brand name. Until 2024, the company was fully owned by Hardenberg and Wæver Hansen. Then they sold part of their shares to Lauder’s investor group. Now here's what Hardenberg told the Danish newspaper Politiken about why they took Lauder’s investment. The investment is not the most important thing for us, but rather gaining better access to the luxury market where our water should be a natural part. When they tested the water, the conclusion was that our water was the best in the world. It is on the basis of that that they became interested in participating in the development of our company. So you could say Lauder's pitch is very simple. We'll help you sell premium Greenlandic water to the American luxury market. But what did Lauder get in return? Why would one of the world's richest men invest in this tiny company in Greenland? Is it the pure water in bottles that he is interested in or is it something else? The two founders of the company weren't able to attract any other investors since the company started in 2016 until Lauder showed up. Personally, I can only see one thing Lauder gets out of this and that's a conflict of Interest pressure point and a foothold into Greenland's top elite. Direct business relationships with politically connected Greenlanders. Think about it. Sums of invested funds can now flow very easily to Svend and Jørgen through Greenland Water Bank. It could flow directly as large salaries or bonuses or it can be in the form of a business trip, a fancy office, luxury boats or cars. All of course in the name of the company paid by invested money from Lauder. The possibilities for enriching Svend and Jørgen are endless and so is the money that Lauder has at his disposal. $10 million is nothing for Lauder who is good for 5 billion USD. But being in business together can also be a pressure point. An investor can sue you and make your life a living hell, especially if the pockets are very deep and you can buy every lawyer and PR person to spin stories and drag people through the mud. That's the negative pressure angle that this co-operation can also lead to. But the most controversial part is still the connection to the active foreign minister of Greenland, Vivian Motzfeldt. The foreign minister previously served on the board of Greenland Water Bank, but she must have felt that that would have been too obvious a conflict of interest. But the problem is still there. It's the family connection to her husband that makes up the problem in the company that's now partially owned by Trump's friend, who also happens to be the brain behind Trump's acquisition plans. In other words, if Ronald Lauder decides to invest a large sum in Greenland water bank and also pay out a huge bonus to Yan, this money will also enrich Vivian. If it was almost any other investor in the entire world, it wouldn't have been a problem. ____ The Zionists appear to be up to something more ambitious than any previous state or movement in the modern period. If Venezuela and Greenland are both Pax Judaica plays via Singer and Lauder, which Jewish supremacist oligarch is responsible for Canada, the Horn of Africa/Yemen or elsewhere? This is much bigger than just deporting Palestinians, or even resource-grabbing. #DismantleZionism
6:35

After Trump kidnapped Maduro on behalf of Pax Judaica, he turned his attention elsewhere. To Greenland. Trump has announced that they're considering using military force to take over Greenland. But surely his interest in Greenland is only about the interests of US Empire and not that of the transnational empire being developed by the Zionists? Think again. The entire power of the US military is now at the disposal of individual Zionist Oligarchs for whatever pet project they want. In this case the genocidal Jewish supremacist is Ronald Lauder. What is Lauder’s connection to Greenland? Here is Danish social scientist Steven N. Højlund (in the video below with extracts pasted here to). While Trump threatens to seize Greenland by force, a quieter takeover is already underway. And it's happening through the same billionaire who planted the idea in Trump's head Ronald Lauder. The same Lauder who convinced Trump to buy Greenland back in 2017, isn't just talking anymore. He's buying his way in, through a Delaware registered company called Greenland Development Partners. Lauder has quietly purchased stakes in strategic Greenlandic companies. But here's what nobody's reporting. His business partners in Greenland are some of Greenland's most influential people with very, very close ties to Greenland's foreign minister. That's the same person negotiating Greenland's response to Trump's threats. This is economic infiltration disguised as investment and I'm going to show you exactly how it works... This is the story the media isn't telling. Let me introduce you to Greenland Development Partners. It's a Delaware registered investment consortium. And if that sounds deliberately obscure, that's because it is. Delaware corporations are famous for one thing and that's opacity. Delaware is the shell company's capital of America where you can hide ownership structures and avoid scrutiny. According to Danish newspaper Politken's investigation, Lauder is a key participant in this consortium. And the consortium has bought stakes in two Greenlandic companies. One of these companies is called Greenland Water Bank: and it's owned by two Greenlandic businessmen, Svend Hardenberg and Jørgen Wæver Johansen. Hardenberg is a former top civil servant and top adviser to the prime minister of Greenland until he got fired recently. He was also the director of Greenland's National Energy Company. In other words, he knows the system inside and out. But Johansen is far more interesting. Johansen is a former minister in several Greenlandic governments and he currently chairs the governing Siumut party in Nuuk, Greenland's capital. Siumut is one of the four parties in Greenland's current coalition government. But that's not the real kicker. His wife is Vivian Motzfeldt, the foreign minister of Greenland. That's the person responsible for handling foreign relations, including relations with the United States. Just take a moment and think about what that means. Ronald Lauder, Trump's friend and adviser on Greenland, is now in business with the husband of Greenland's foreign minister. This isn't just investment. This is influence buying at the very highest level. And I will explain why that is the case. The company Greenland Water Bank, it sounds small and innocent, and it really is. In fact, in 2024, the company's accounts showed minimum staffing costs of only $5,500 and a modest financial loss. In other words, this is a very small company. Greenland Water Bank bottles water from the Lyngmark Spring [near the town of Qeqertarsuaq on Disko Island]…They sell the water locally in the brand name. Until 2024, the company was fully owned by Hardenberg and Wæver Hansen. Then they sold part of their shares to Lauder’s investor group. Now here's what Hardenberg told the Danish newspaper Politiken about why they took Lauder’s investment. The investment is not the most important thing for us, but rather gaining better access to the luxury market where our water should be a natural part. When they tested the water, the conclusion was that our water was the best in the world. It is on the basis of that that they became interested in participating in the development of our company. So you could say Lauder's pitch is very simple. We'll help you sell premium Greenlandic water to the American luxury market. But what did Lauder get in return? Why would one of the world's richest men invest in this tiny company in Greenland? Is it the pure water in bottles that he is interested in or is it something else? The two founders of the company weren't able to attract any other investors since the company started in 2016 until Lauder showed up. Personally, I can only see one thing Lauder gets out of this and that's a conflict of Interest pressure point and a foothold into Greenland's top elite. Direct business relationships with politically connected Greenlanders. Think about it. Sums of invested funds can now flow very easily to Svend and Jørgen through Greenland Water Bank. It could flow directly as large salaries or bonuses or it can be in the form of a business trip, a fancy office, luxury boats or cars. All of course in the name of the company paid by invested money from Lauder. The possibilities for enriching Svend and Jørgen are endless and so is the money that Lauder has at his disposal. $10 million is nothing for Lauder who is good for 5 billion USD. But being in business together can also be a pressure point. An investor can sue you and make your life a living hell, especially if the pockets are very deep and you can buy every lawyer and PR person to spin stories and drag people through the mud. That's the negative pressure angle that this co-operation can also lead to. But the most controversial part is still the connection to the active foreign minister of Greenland, Vivian Motzfeldt. The foreign minister previously served on the board of Greenland Water Bank, but she must have felt that that would have been too obvious a conflict of interest. But the problem is still there. It's the family connection to her husband that makes up the problem in the company that's now partially owned by Trump's friend, who also happens to be the brain behind Trump's acquisition plans. In other words, if Ronald Lauder decides to invest a large sum in Greenland water bank and also pay out a huge bonus to Yan, this money will also enrich Vivian. If it was almost any other investor in the entire world, it wouldn't have been a problem. ____ The Zionists appear to be up to something more ambitious than any previous state or movement in the modern period. If Venezuela and Greenland are both Pax Judaica plays via Singer and Lauder, which Jewish supremacist oligarch is responsible for Canada, the Horn of Africa/Yemen or elsewhere? This is much bigger than just deporting Palestinians, or even resource-grabbing. #DismantleZionism

David Miller

188,501 views • 7 months ago