Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Not just drones, but unmanned submarines too! Introducing Formula 1 (潜鸟一号) by Shenzhen's Loon Innovations (潜鸟创新), a tandem-rotor, cross-medium amphibious vehicle that operates both in the air and underwater., is capable of operating in both aquatic and aerial environments. Loon Innovations Technology Co., Ltd., based in Shenzhen, specialises in...

sz_mediagroup's profile picture

Shenzhen Channel

22,208 subscribers

31,291 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🇷🇺💥🇺🇦 Massive strikes have been carried out against military-industrial complex facilities and port infrastructure in Kiev and Odesa. ▪️During the night, the Russian Armed Forces launched massive strikes using high-precision, long-range weapons, both land-based and air-based, as well as attack drones. ▪️In Kiev, facilities of the military-industrial complex involved in the production and storage of long- and medium-range unmanned aerial vehicles were hit. ▪️Strikes were also carried out against infrastructure facilities in the ports of "Odesa" and "Yuzhny," which are used for receiving, storing, and handling military cargo and fuel. ▪️In addition, during the transit of ships to ports in the Odessa region, a naval vessel and a high-speed boat belonging to the Ukrainian Special Operations Forces were hit.
0:12

🇷🇺💥🇺🇦 Massive strikes have been carried out against military-industrial complex facilities and port infrastructure in Kiev and Odesa. ▪️During the night, the Russian Armed Forces launched massive strikes using high-precision, long-range weapons, both land-based and air-based, as well as attack drones. ▪️In Kiev, facilities of the military-industrial complex involved in the production and storage of long- and medium-range unmanned aerial vehicles were hit. ▪️Strikes were also carried out against infrastructure facilities in the ports of "Odesa" and "Yuzhny," which are used for receiving, storing, and handling military cargo and fuel. ▪️In addition, during the transit of ships to ports in the Odessa region, a naval vessel and a high-speed boat belonging to the Ukrainian Special Operations Forces were hit.

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺🇮🇪

16,817 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Cthulhu is NOT an aquatic entity. August Derleth infamously tried to categorize Cthulhu this way. And of course, Cthulhu does have feelers on his head. But he is not from the sea. He is imprisoned under the sea, and it's a prison partly because of the sea. In his million-year war against the Elder Things, both sides were amphibious. Cthulhu seized the land, and forced the Elder Things to retreat to the water against their will. The land was clearly the more desirable possession. (video by AI Playground) 1/2
0:10

Cthulhu is NOT an aquatic entity. August Derleth infamously tried to categorize Cthulhu this way. And of course, Cthulhu does have feelers on his head. But he is not from the sea. He is imprisoned under the sea, and it's a prison partly because of the sea. In his million-year war against the Elder Things, both sides were amphibious. Cthulhu seized the land, and forced the Elder Things to retreat to the water against their will. The land was clearly the more desirable possession. (video by AI Playground) 1/2

Sandy Petersen 🪔

30,508 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🇮🇷🇺🇲 Meanwhile, a U.S. Marine Corps group from the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), led by the flagship amphibious assault ship USS Boxer (LHD-4), has approached the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) area of responsibility. The amphibious ready group, along with 2,500 Marines from the 11th MEU, was dispatched to the Middle East as early as late March. However, after departing from San Diego Naval Base, the group conducted several weeks of exercises in the Pacific Ocean, later deployed to Guam for replenishment, and then headed toward the Middle East. According to the latest update, the group has already passed through the Strait of Malacca and was located in the Indian Ocean, somewhere near Sri Lanka. It is expected that in a few hours, the USS Boxer (LHD-4) and the 2,500 Marines will be positioned in the Arabian Sea, awaiting a potential ground operation against Iran. As a reminder, the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit of the U.S. Marine Corps, led by the flagship amphibious assault ship USS Tripoli (LHA-7), is already participating in the blockade against Iran. For reference, both the USS Tripoli (LHA-7) and the USS Boxer (LHD-4) are capable of carrying F-35B carrier-based stealth fighters. Circulated photographs confirm that both vessels are in full combat formation, including F-35Bs on their decks. Video is made Grok AI
0:10

🇮🇷🇺🇲 Meanwhile, a U.S. Marine Corps group from the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), led by the flagship amphibious assault ship USS Boxer (LHD-4), has approached the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) area of responsibility. The amphibious ready group, along with 2,500 Marines from the 11th MEU, was dispatched to the Middle East as early as late March. However, after departing from San Diego Naval Base, the group conducted several weeks of exercises in the Pacific Ocean, later deployed to Guam for replenishment, and then headed toward the Middle East. According to the latest update, the group has already passed through the Strait of Malacca and was located in the Indian Ocean, somewhere near Sri Lanka. It is expected that in a few hours, the USS Boxer (LHD-4) and the 2,500 Marines will be positioned in the Arabian Sea, awaiting a potential ground operation against Iran. As a reminder, the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit of the U.S. Marine Corps, led by the flagship amphibious assault ship USS Tripoli (LHA-7), is already participating in the blockade against Iran. For reference, both the USS Tripoli (LHA-7) and the USS Boxer (LHD-4) are capable of carrying F-35B carrier-based stealth fighters. Circulated photographs confirm that both vessels are in full combat formation, including F-35Bs on their decks. Video is made Grok AI

Visioner

17,467 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Arms sales: China Needs More Responsibility Instead of Glorifying the Market It's been a while since Beijing stopped picking sides in wars, they just want to win at all costs. They sell weapons, components, or drones to both contenders, rake in huge profits, and still claim to be "neutral and peaceful." Pragmatism without hypocrisy, and it's nothing new. In Ukraine, at the start of the war, components and drones served both sides. Later, they cut off direct supplies to both, but everyone kept buying through third parties, and the Chinese obviously know about it. Profit guaranteed. In the recent Thailand-Cambodia war, they sold VT-4 tanks and S26T submarines to Thailand, and guided missiles - to destroy the tanks sold to Thailand?-, rockets, and artillery to Cambodia. Chinese weapons exchanging fire from both sides, but the Chinese say it's just "normal defense cooperation." Israel and Iran is another perfect example: a Chinese state-owned company has been operating the port of Haifa in Israel since 2021 and is now involved in rebuilding the destruction caused by Iranian missiles, while selling ballistic missile components to Iran to repeat the feat and financing Iran's reconstruction until Israel repeats it too. In Africa, the effect is the same: in Sudan, they sold to the government, and weapons ended up with the RSF paramilitaries because they were also bought by the Emirates and passed on to Sudanese rebels; in the DRC, they sell to the government, but Chinese weapons also end up with militias like M23 through resale by Uganda and Rwanda; in Libya, they sold to Gaddafi, but right after his fall, they kept doing business with both main factions, and still do today. None of this started now. A classic from the 80s: in the Iran-Iraq war, China was the biggest supplier to BOTH sides at the same time, billions in tanks, missiles, and artillery for each. Obviously, this kind of policy was done by the West a long time ago, but it always faced criticism from the media. Anyone in the arms market knows that the Chinese maintain strict control over their sales. Even simple price quotes are centralized and selective. There's no way the government doesn't know exactly where the weapons are going. They're making the same mistakes the West made in the past.
0:12

Arms sales: China Needs More Responsibility Instead of Glorifying the Market It's been a while since Beijing stopped picking sides in wars, they just want to win at all costs. They sell weapons, components, or drones to both contenders, rake in huge profits, and still claim to be "neutral and peaceful." Pragmatism without hypocrisy, and it's nothing new. In Ukraine, at the start of the war, components and drones served both sides. Later, they cut off direct supplies to both, but everyone kept buying through third parties, and the Chinese obviously know about it. Profit guaranteed. In the recent Thailand-Cambodia war, they sold VT-4 tanks and S26T submarines to Thailand, and guided missiles - to destroy the tanks sold to Thailand?-, rockets, and artillery to Cambodia. Chinese weapons exchanging fire from both sides, but the Chinese say it's just "normal defense cooperation." Israel and Iran is another perfect example: a Chinese state-owned company has been operating the port of Haifa in Israel since 2021 and is now involved in rebuilding the destruction caused by Iranian missiles, while selling ballistic missile components to Iran to repeat the feat and financing Iran's reconstruction until Israel repeats it too. In Africa, the effect is the same: in Sudan, they sold to the government, and weapons ended up with the RSF paramilitaries because they were also bought by the Emirates and passed on to Sudanese rebels; in the DRC, they sell to the government, but Chinese weapons also end up with militias like M23 through resale by Uganda and Rwanda; in Libya, they sold to Gaddafi, but right after his fall, they kept doing business with both main factions, and still do today. None of this started now. A classic from the 80s: in the Iran-Iraq war, China was the biggest supplier to BOTH sides at the same time, billions in tanks, missiles, and artillery for each. Obviously, this kind of policy was done by the West a long time ago, but it always faced criticism from the media. Anyone in the arms market knows that the Chinese maintain strict control over their sales. Even simple price quotes are centralized and selective. There's no way the government doesn't know exactly where the weapons are going. They're making the same mistakes the West made in the past.

Patricia Marins

38,310 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🇺🇦🛳️ Ukrainian drones carried out a strike last night on two Russian transport ships in the Taganrog Bay of the Sea of Azov — the “Natra” and the “Tsirkon”. As a result, 5 sailors were killed on the spot. 🔹 Both vessels were operated by private crews, including Azerbaijani contractors. The ships were sailing under a foreign flag and were heading to the Russian port of Taganrog to load grain. This attack demonstrates Ukraine’s growing reach and effectiveness in the Sea of Azov. Striking transport ships involved in grain logistics further complicates Russian efforts to sustain economic activity in the region and shows that even vessels under foreign flags are not immune when operating in support of Russia’s war economy. Video is generated by grok AI
0:10

🇺🇦🛳️ Ukrainian drones carried out a strike last night on two Russian transport ships in the Taganrog Bay of the Sea of Azov — the “Natra” and the “Tsirkon”. As a result, 5 sailors were killed on the spot. 🔹 Both vessels were operated by private crews, including Azerbaijani contractors. The ships were sailing under a foreign flag and were heading to the Russian port of Taganrog to load grain. This attack demonstrates Ukraine’s growing reach and effectiveness in the Sea of Azov. Striking transport ships involved in grain logistics further complicates Russian efforts to sustain economic activity in the region and shows that even vessels under foreign flags are not immune when operating in support of Russia’s war economy. Video is generated by grok AI

NSTRIKE

140,945 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

JUST IN: 🇵🇱🇷🇺 Poland Just Unleashed One of the World's Stealthiest Submarines, Russia Is Watching Poland has signed a $4.83 billion deal with Sweden's Saab to acquire three A26 Blekinge class submarines equipped with Air Independent Propulsion (AIP), one of the world's most advanced conventional submarine technologies. Capable of remaining submerged for weeks with an exceptionally low acoustic signature, the A26 is built for stealth, intelligence gathering, anti submarine warfare, sea denial operations, and precision strike missions, making it extremely difficult to detect in the Baltic Sea. With this acquisition, Poland is rapidly transforming into one of NATO's most capable underwater powers on the Alliance's eastern flank, sending a clear strategic signal that the Baltic will not be easy for any adversary to dominate.
0:14

JUST IN: 🇵🇱🇷🇺 Poland Just Unleashed One of the World's Stealthiest Submarines, Russia Is Watching Poland has signed a $4.83 billion deal with Sweden's Saab to acquire three A26 Blekinge class submarines equipped with Air Independent Propulsion (AIP), one of the world's most advanced conventional submarine technologies. Capable of remaining submerged for weeks with an exceptionally low acoustic signature, the A26 is built for stealth, intelligence gathering, anti submarine warfare, sea denial operations, and precision strike missions, making it extremely difficult to detect in the Baltic Sea. With this acquisition, Poland is rapidly transforming into one of NATO's most capable underwater powers on the Alliance's eastern flank, sending a clear strategic signal that the Baltic will not be easy for any adversary to dominate.

War Radar

27,473 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇨🇳💥In the age of drones, China is building the world's largest naval gun — why? The PLA is testing a new 155mm naval gun capable of firing guided and extended-range munitions — a move that could significantly strengthen China's amphibious warfare capabilities, the SCMP reports. 🔸 Cost efficiency: sustained naval firepower at a fraction of missile strike expenses, especially for prolonged engagements 🔸 Volume over precision: 155mm artillery prioritizes rapid suppression of coastal and lightly armored targets 🔸 Logistics: shared 155mm ammunition with ground forces could simplify PLA supply chains 🔸 Multi-role potential: swarm defense against drones, unmanned surface vessels, and limited missile threats through barrage fire 🔸 Extended range: ammunition could reportedly push strike range to 100–200 km The project indicates that China sees conventional naval artillery not as obsolete, but as a critical tool for future high-intensity conflicts.
0:15

🇨🇳💥In the age of drones, China is building the world's largest naval gun — why? The PLA is testing a new 155mm naval gun capable of firing guided and extended-range munitions — a move that could significantly strengthen China's amphibious warfare capabilities, the SCMP reports. 🔸 Cost efficiency: sustained naval firepower at a fraction of missile strike expenses, especially for prolonged engagements 🔸 Volume over precision: 155mm artillery prioritizes rapid suppression of coastal and lightly armored targets 🔸 Logistics: shared 155mm ammunition with ground forces could simplify PLA supply chains 🔸 Multi-role potential: swarm defense against drones, unmanned surface vessels, and limited missile threats through barrage fire 🔸 Extended range: ammunition could reportedly push strike range to 100–200 km The project indicates that China sees conventional naval artillery not as obsolete, but as a critical tool for future high-intensity conflicts.

Sputnik

15,341 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

RC-135 Deployments Signal Imminent Attack: Myths and Realities of Iran's Military Power The RC-135 is a family of large reconnaissance aircraft operated by the ISAF. These jets are designed for ISR missions, providing near real-time data to military commanders and national leaders. The primary variant focuses on detecting, identifying, and geolocating electromagnetic signals, such as communications, radar emissions, and electronic warfare activities. Based on past experience, the early arrival of these aircraft often signals that an attack may be very close. But what about Iran, what capabilities does it actually have? There are many myths surrounding Iran's military power. Here are some key points: 1. Israel did not overfly Iran during the 12-day war This is implausible. Most part of the munitions used included bombs like the GBU-28 and GBU-31, both with ranges under 25 km, which suggests they could only have been dropped from inside Iranian territory. 2. Iranian missiles have poor accuracy In 2025, several Iranian missiles were launched against targets in Erbil, Iraq, with excellent precision. During the 12-day war, Iran struck the Weizmann Institute and the Haifa refinery with high accuracy, as well as some Israeli launchers, all in an environment of heavy jamming. The truth is that Iranian missile accuracy depends on the model. Iran has missiles in its arsenal that are more than 15 years old, but there is no evidence that the precision of its modern anti-ship missiles is deficient. 3. Iranian air defenses are of very poor quality This cannot be stated with absolute certainty because they were never fully tested. Israel's ground sabotage operations were highly effective, successfully disabling radars and most short-range air defense systems. Iran does not keep its long- and medium-range air defenses permanently deployed, and consequently none of them were destroyed during the 12 days of war. 4. Iran has no radars capable of detecting stealth aircraft In 2024, Iranian radars locked onto Israeli F-35s while they were still over Iraqi territory. In 2025, Iranian-supplied radars integrated into missile batteries in Yemen also locked onto and fired at U.S. F-35s on multiple occasions, nearly downing one. 5. The high technology of U.S. ships and aircraft will paralyze Iranian weapons This would only happen if the Iranians turned their systems off, as reportedly occurred in the Venezuela case. So far, Iranian equipment has proven extremely resistant to interference. Shahed drones continue to operate accurately, and after years of Western efforts, they have not been successfully jammed. This will pose a major challenge for the Americans. 6. The U.S. Carrier Strike Group will easily crush the Iranian navy They would destroy Iran's large ships in minutes, but they would face enormous difficulty against mini-submarines, USVs, UAVs, UUVs, and fast attack craft equipped with missiles. In additional, the U.S. drones would not have complete freedom for target acquisition and would have to rely on LEO/ISR sats. Iran possesses drones like the Karrar, a jet-powered interceptor equipped with air-to-air missiles that can operate at 15,000 meters to deny U.S. drones freedom of action. The Israelis lost an unknown number of drones during the 12-day war, though losses were reported. Summary Does Iran have any advantage? At sea, against the current Carrier Strike Group and considering all of Iran's resources, I would say Iran holds an advantage, evidenced by factors such as missile range, number of containers, tubes, VLS cells, drones, mines, submarines, anti-ship missiles, and other assets. However, once the focus shifts from the sea to the air, the American advantage is overwhelming, both in satellite intelligence and in combat aviation. And this is the type of war the Americans know best.
0:14

RC-135 Deployments Signal Imminent Attack: Myths and Realities of Iran's Military Power The RC-135 is a family of large reconnaissance aircraft operated by the ISAF. These jets are designed for ISR missions, providing near real-time data to military commanders and national leaders. The primary variant focuses on detecting, identifying, and geolocating electromagnetic signals, such as communications, radar emissions, and electronic warfare activities. Based on past experience, the early arrival of these aircraft often signals that an attack may be very close. But what about Iran, what capabilities does it actually have? There are many myths surrounding Iran's military power. Here are some key points: 1. Israel did not overfly Iran during the 12-day war This is implausible. Most part of the munitions used included bombs like the GBU-28 and GBU-31, both with ranges under 25 km, which suggests they could only have been dropped from inside Iranian territory. 2. Iranian missiles have poor accuracy In 2025, several Iranian missiles were launched against targets in Erbil, Iraq, with excellent precision. During the 12-day war, Iran struck the Weizmann Institute and the Haifa refinery with high accuracy, as well as some Israeli launchers, all in an environment of heavy jamming. The truth is that Iranian missile accuracy depends on the model. Iran has missiles in its arsenal that are more than 15 years old, but there is no evidence that the precision of its modern anti-ship missiles is deficient. 3. Iranian air defenses are of very poor quality This cannot be stated with absolute certainty because they were never fully tested. Israel's ground sabotage operations were highly effective, successfully disabling radars and most short-range air defense systems. Iran does not keep its long- and medium-range air defenses permanently deployed, and consequently none of them were destroyed during the 12 days of war. 4. Iran has no radars capable of detecting stealth aircraft In 2024, Iranian radars locked onto Israeli F-35s while they were still over Iraqi territory. In 2025, Iranian-supplied radars integrated into missile batteries in Yemen also locked onto and fired at U.S. F-35s on multiple occasions, nearly downing one. 5. The high technology of U.S. ships and aircraft will paralyze Iranian weapons This would only happen if the Iranians turned their systems off, as reportedly occurred in the Venezuela case. So far, Iranian equipment has proven extremely resistant to interference. Shahed drones continue to operate accurately, and after years of Western efforts, they have not been successfully jammed. This will pose a major challenge for the Americans. 6. The U.S. Carrier Strike Group will easily crush the Iranian navy They would destroy Iran's large ships in minutes, but they would face enormous difficulty against mini-submarines, USVs, UAVs, UUVs, and fast attack craft equipped with missiles. In additional, the U.S. drones would not have complete freedom for target acquisition and would have to rely on LEO/ISR sats. Iran possesses drones like the Karrar, a jet-powered interceptor equipped with air-to-air missiles that can operate at 15,000 meters to deny U.S. drones freedom of action. The Israelis lost an unknown number of drones during the 12-day war, though losses were reported. Summary Does Iran have any advantage? At sea, against the current Carrier Strike Group and considering all of Iran's resources, I would say Iran holds an advantage, evidenced by factors such as missile range, number of containers, tubes, VLS cells, drones, mines, submarines, anti-ship missiles, and other assets. However, once the focus shifts from the sea to the air, the American advantage is overwhelming, both in satellite intelligence and in combat aviation. And this is the type of war the Americans know best.

Patricia Marins

30,566 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

This is from Shenzhen. The road is full of homeless people, while China often claims it has provided housing to 100% of its population. So maybe they are just outside enjoying some fresh air. Disclaimer: I am not anti-China. In fact, I admire China's progress and development. This post is only for those ₹2 trolls who constantly mock India by saying China is living in 2070 while India is far behind. China has done remarkably well and transformed many of its cities, no doubt about that. But trolling India is foolish. Travel a few hundred kilometers beyond the major Chinese cities and you will find many underdeveloped areas as well. China is working to reduce those problems, and India is doing the same. There is no need for this endless India vs China comparison. Both countries have their own strengths, challenges, and development journeys. #China #India
0:13

This is from Shenzhen. The road is full of homeless people, while China often claims it has provided housing to 100% of its population. So maybe they are just outside enjoying some fresh air. Disclaimer: I am not anti-China. In fact, I admire China's progress and development. This post is only for those ₹2 trolls who constantly mock India by saying China is living in 2070 while India is far behind. China has done remarkably well and transformed many of its cities, no doubt about that. But trolling India is foolish. Travel a few hundred kilometers beyond the major Chinese cities and you will find many underdeveloped areas as well. China is working to reduce those problems, and India is doing the same. There is no need for this endless India vs China comparison. Both countries have their own strengths, challenges, and development journeys. #China #India

Vijay

62,710 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇷🇺🚀 Russia unleashes Zircon and Kalibr missiles on NATO-launchpad Ukraine 📍 Russian forces carried out a sweeping, long-range assault across Ukraine overnight on July 30, using precision air-, land- and sea-based strikes backed by waves of attack drones against defense facilities, communications hubs and key logistics sites. Which assets have been struck? Kiev 🟠 Mayak Plant, which manufactures components, warheads, detonators, ammunition and launch boosters for FP-1/FP-2 long- and medium-range attack drones 🟠 Kiev Electrotechnical Plant, which produces medium-range reconnaissance and attack drones, including multicopter UAVs Lvov 🟠 LDARZ Lvov Aircraft Repair Plant, which repairs and manufactures turbojet engines used in FP-5 Flamingo cruise missiles and long- and medium-range drones 🟠 LORTA Plant, which manufactures missile electronics and radar systems for Neptune-MD long-range guided missiles and the Klon air defense system, an S-300 analogue Ivano-Frankovsk region 🟠 SKB OVT plant, involved in the production of Flamingo, FP-7 and FP-9 tactical ballistic missiles, Neptune-MD, and testing of warheads for Grom-2 operational-tactical missiles 🟠 Neftemash, involved in the production of Flamingo as well as storing and distributing their components, including those supplied by NATO Rovno region 🟠 RovnoAzot chemical plant, which manufactures missile component assemblies and rocket fuel components for Flamingo, FP-7 and FP-9, and Grom-2 Dnepropetrovsk region 🟠 Akvaplast Turbofan Plant, which develops, assembles, and stores attack drones and unmanned surface vessels. In cooperation with Energomekhkomplekt, it also manufactures and repairs towed and self-propelled howitzers Odessa region 🟠 A cargo ship carrying military supplies in the Yuzhny Port 🟠 Two cargo ships transporting weapons and military equipment to the ports of Odessa and Chernomorsk Which weapons did Russia employ? According to Russian military observers, the July 30 attack involved a broad range of strike capabilities, including: ▪️ Geran and Gerbera attack drones ▪️ Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles ▪️ Iskander-M ballistic missiles ▪️ Kalibr cruise missiles ▪️ Banderol subsonic cruise missiles ▪️ FAB-series aerial bombs with UMPK guidance kits ▪️ Kh-101 air-launched cruise missiles ▪️ Tornado-S (MLRS), which launch precision-guided rockets — used in strikes against targets in the Sumy region 🟠 The overnight barrage reportedly kept Ukraine under fire for more than six hours. According to Ukrainian estimates, Russia launched at least 358 aerial weapons – including 74 missiles and 284 drones of various types – figures that have not been independently verified. 🟠 Ukrainian media once again lamented shortages of Patriot interceptor missiles, while reports claimed that in some areas, Zircon hypersonic missiles reached their targets before air raid sirens even had time to sound. 🟠 The dire state of Ukraine’s air defenses amid Volodymyr Zelensky’s continued pursuit of the conflict has been acknowledged even by the Ukrainian dictator himself. His own posts suggest that the Ukrainian regime knew a massive strike was coming but was unable to mount an effective response.
0:18

🇷🇺🚀 Russia unleashes Zircon and Kalibr missiles on NATO-launchpad Ukraine 📍 Russian forces carried out a sweeping, long-range assault across Ukraine overnight on July 30, using precision air-, land- and sea-based strikes backed by waves of attack drones against defense facilities, communications hubs and key logistics sites. Which assets have been struck? Kiev 🟠 Mayak Plant, which manufactures components, warheads, detonators, ammunition and launch boosters for FP-1/FP-2 long- and medium-range attack drones 🟠 Kiev Electrotechnical Plant, which produces medium-range reconnaissance and attack drones, including multicopter UAVs Lvov 🟠 LDARZ Lvov Aircraft Repair Plant, which repairs and manufactures turbojet engines used in FP-5 Flamingo cruise missiles and long- and medium-range drones 🟠 LORTA Plant, which manufactures missile electronics and radar systems for Neptune-MD long-range guided missiles and the Klon air defense system, an S-300 analogue Ivano-Frankovsk region 🟠 SKB OVT plant, involved in the production of Flamingo, FP-7 and FP-9 tactical ballistic missiles, Neptune-MD, and testing of warheads for Grom-2 operational-tactical missiles 🟠 Neftemash, involved in the production of Flamingo as well as storing and distributing their components, including those supplied by NATO Rovno region 🟠 RovnoAzot chemical plant, which manufactures missile component assemblies and rocket fuel components for Flamingo, FP-7 and FP-9, and Grom-2 Dnepropetrovsk region 🟠 Akvaplast Turbofan Plant, which develops, assembles, and stores attack drones and unmanned surface vessels. In cooperation with Energomekhkomplekt, it also manufactures and repairs towed and self-propelled howitzers Odessa region 🟠 A cargo ship carrying military supplies in the Yuzhny Port 🟠 Two cargo ships transporting weapons and military equipment to the ports of Odessa and Chernomorsk Which weapons did Russia employ? According to Russian military observers, the July 30 attack involved a broad range of strike capabilities, including: ▪️ Geran and Gerbera attack drones ▪️ Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles ▪️ Iskander-M ballistic missiles ▪️ Kalibr cruise missiles ▪️ Banderol subsonic cruise missiles ▪️ FAB-series aerial bombs with UMPK guidance kits ▪️ Kh-101 air-launched cruise missiles ▪️ Tornado-S (MLRS), which launch precision-guided rockets — used in strikes against targets in the Sumy region 🟠 The overnight barrage reportedly kept Ukraine under fire for more than six hours. According to Ukrainian estimates, Russia launched at least 358 aerial weapons – including 74 missiles and 284 drones of various types – figures that have not been independently verified. 🟠 Ukrainian media once again lamented shortages of Patriot interceptor missiles, while reports claimed that in some areas, Zircon hypersonic missiles reached their targets before air raid sirens even had time to sound. 🟠 The dire state of Ukraine’s air defenses amid Volodymyr Zelensky’s continued pursuit of the conflict has been acknowledged even by the Ukrainian dictator himself. His own posts suggest that the Ukrainian regime knew a massive strike was coming but was unable to mount an effective response.

Sputnik

16,509 просмотров • 24 дней назад

THE FIRST WAVE ON THE BEACH WON’T BE HUMAN ANYMORE. Multi-legged robots don’t need the beach cleared first. That’s the entire point. Ukraine already ran the real version of this. An uncrewed boat dropped a robot on a beach. It opened fire with a remote machine gun before a single soldier landed. China’s done it too. PLA footage from October 2025 showed robot dogs paired with drones in a live amphibious landing drill near Taiwan. The real mission set: underwater beach surveys, mine detection, coastal mapping. Jobs that used to send Navy SEALs in first. This is now an official vehicle category for defense contractors — beach landings, amphibious recon, route clearance through the surf zone. The honest catch: this is mostly recon and mine-clearance, not an armed assault unit yet. Beaches used to be cleared by soldiers. Now it’s machines. Would you trust a robot to scout the beach before you land on it?
0:18

THE FIRST WAVE ON THE BEACH WON’T BE HUMAN ANYMORE. Multi-legged robots don’t need the beach cleared first. That’s the entire point. Ukraine already ran the real version of this. An uncrewed boat dropped a robot on a beach. It opened fire with a remote machine gun before a single soldier landed. China’s done it too. PLA footage from October 2025 showed robot dogs paired with drones in a live amphibious landing drill near Taiwan. The real mission set: underwater beach surveys, mine detection, coastal mapping. Jobs that used to send Navy SEALs in first. This is now an official vehicle category for defense contractors — beach landings, amphibious recon, route clearance through the surf zone. The honest catch: this is mostly recon and mine-clearance, not an armed assault unit yet. Beaches used to be cleared by soldiers. Now it’s machines. Would you trust a robot to scout the beach before you land on it?

DN_DEGEN

98,896 просмотров • 17 дней назад

JUST IN: Iran gave Russia its Shahed drones. Russia improved them in Ukraine. Now Western intelligence says Russia is shipping the upgraded versions back to Iran. And the country that learned how to kill those drones on the battlefield just sent 228 experts to the Gulf to teach five countries how to do the same thing. The full circle is extraordinary. Iran supplied thousands of Shahed-136 kamikaze drones to Russia starting in 2022 for use against Ukraine. Russia rebranded them Geran-2 and, over three years of combat, upgraded the navigation systems, added anti-jamming capabilities, improved the engines, and refined the payload delivery. The Financial Times and AP reported on March 26 citing Western intelligence that Russia is now in the final stages of shipping those upgraded Geran-2 drones back to Iran’s IRGC, along with medicine and food supplies. Kremlin spokesman Peskov called the reports “lies” and “fake news dumps.” Meanwhile, Zelensky arrived in Saudi Arabia on March 26 for an unannounced visit, met Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, signed a defense cooperation deal focused on air defense and drone expertise, and departed Jeddah on March 28. Ukraine has deployed 201 to 228 military drone specialists to five Gulf and Middle Eastern countries: the UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Jordan. Another 34 are ready per Zelensky’s statement on March 17. These specialists are not there as a symbolic gesture. They bring the single most effective counter to Shahed drones that exists anywhere on earth. Ukraine developed FPV interceptor drones that account for roughly 70 percent of all Shahed and Geran-2 shootdowns in Ukraine per Forces News and Atlantic Council reporting. The method: radar and acoustic sensors detect the incoming drone at 20 to 50 kilometres. A cheap, fast quadcopter or fixed-wing interceptor launches from a mobile platform. An operator pilots it at high speed toward the target. It destroys the Shahed through kamikaze collision or a small explosive payload on impact. Cost per intercept: a fraction of what a surface-to-air missile costs. Militarnyi reported on March 22 that Ukrainian teams have already confirmed multiple Shahed shootdowns in the Middle East. The arms race running through this war is now a closed loop. Iran builds the drone. Russia tests it, improves it, and allegedly sends the improved version back. Ukraine learns to kill it through three years of battlefield iteration. Ukraine exports that knowledge to the Gulf states Iran is attacking. The Gulf states pay Ukraine in money, technology, and diplomatic support. Russia denies everything while the drones fly in both directions. This is not a bilateral conflict. It is a global drone ecosystem where every improvement by one side is studied, countered, and re-exported by the other. The Shahed that hits a refinery in Bahrain tonight may carry Russian-upgraded navigation. The interceptor that destroys it may be piloted by a Ukrainian operator trained in Zaporizhzhia. The defense deal that funded the deployment was signed in Jeddah while the war it was designed to address raged 1,500 kilometres to the northeast. SpaceX’s Starlink provides the communications backbone for these teams in contested environments where terrestrial networks are degraded by the same war. The same helium shortage threatening semiconductor fabs and quantum computers is threatening the rocket launches that put Starlink satellites in orbit. The same strait carrying the oil carries the data cables that the drones are trying to protect. Every domain connects through the same 39 kilometres of water. Full analysis -
0:16

JUST IN: Iran gave Russia its Shahed drones. Russia improved them in Ukraine. Now Western intelligence says Russia is shipping the upgraded versions back to Iran. And the country that learned how to kill those drones on the battlefield just sent 228 experts to the Gulf to teach five countries how to do the same thing. The full circle is extraordinary. Iran supplied thousands of Shahed-136 kamikaze drones to Russia starting in 2022 for use against Ukraine. Russia rebranded them Geran-2 and, over three years of combat, upgraded the navigation systems, added anti-jamming capabilities, improved the engines, and refined the payload delivery. The Financial Times and AP reported on March 26 citing Western intelligence that Russia is now in the final stages of shipping those upgraded Geran-2 drones back to Iran’s IRGC, along with medicine and food supplies. Kremlin spokesman Peskov called the reports “lies” and “fake news dumps.” Meanwhile, Zelensky arrived in Saudi Arabia on March 26 for an unannounced visit, met Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, signed a defense cooperation deal focused on air defense and drone expertise, and departed Jeddah on March 28. Ukraine has deployed 201 to 228 military drone specialists to five Gulf and Middle Eastern countries: the UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Jordan. Another 34 are ready per Zelensky’s statement on March 17. These specialists are not there as a symbolic gesture. They bring the single most effective counter to Shahed drones that exists anywhere on earth. Ukraine developed FPV interceptor drones that account for roughly 70 percent of all Shahed and Geran-2 shootdowns in Ukraine per Forces News and Atlantic Council reporting. The method: radar and acoustic sensors detect the incoming drone at 20 to 50 kilometres. A cheap, fast quadcopter or fixed-wing interceptor launches from a mobile platform. An operator pilots it at high speed toward the target. It destroys the Shahed through kamikaze collision or a small explosive payload on impact. Cost per intercept: a fraction of what a surface-to-air missile costs. Militarnyi reported on March 22 that Ukrainian teams have already confirmed multiple Shahed shootdowns in the Middle East. The arms race running through this war is now a closed loop. Iran builds the drone. Russia tests it, improves it, and allegedly sends the improved version back. Ukraine learns to kill it through three years of battlefield iteration. Ukraine exports that knowledge to the Gulf states Iran is attacking. The Gulf states pay Ukraine in money, technology, and diplomatic support. Russia denies everything while the drones fly in both directions. This is not a bilateral conflict. It is a global drone ecosystem where every improvement by one side is studied, countered, and re-exported by the other. The Shahed that hits a refinery in Bahrain tonight may carry Russian-upgraded navigation. The interceptor that destroys it may be piloted by a Ukrainian operator trained in Zaporizhzhia. The defense deal that funded the deployment was signed in Jeddah while the war it was designed to address raged 1,500 kilometres to the northeast. SpaceX’s Starlink provides the communications backbone for these teams in contested environments where terrestrial networks are degraded by the same war. The same helium shortage threatening semiconductor fabs and quantum computers is threatening the rocket launches that put Starlink satellites in orbit. The same strait carrying the oil carries the data cables that the drones are trying to protect. Every domain connects through the same 39 kilometres of water. Full analysis -

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

1,296,672 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇺🇦 Ukraine has significantly increased the deployment of its domestically produced electronic warfare system “Lima” both on the front lines and in the deep rear. 🟥 Lima is a Ukrainian-made system that does not destroy drones and missiles, but instead disrupts their navigation and alters their course. 🚀 Effect on missiles: Thanks to Lima, missiles lose satellite navigation, causing their accuracy to degrade by approximately 2 kilometers for every 100 kilometers flown. This means a missile aimed at an infrastructure target can ultimately land in an open field. 💰 Cost: One Lima unit costs up to 3 million hryvnia. Protecting a large city requires 30 to 100 stations — approximately €5 million, which is roughly the price of a single Patriot PAC-3 missile. Where physically destroying every threat is too expensive, it is possible to disrupt their guidance systems and force them to miss targets by a significant margin. 🟥 According to Cascade Systems, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have already received more than 400 Lima complexes. Over the past 18 months, the system has suppressed over 20,500 Shahed-type drones and altered the course of dozens of cruise and ballistic missiles. Lima represents one of Ukraine’s most effective and economical innovations in the war. By redirecting rather than destroying incoming threats, it achieves substantial defensive results at a fraction of the cost of traditional air defense systems. Its mass deployment is playing a major role in reducing the effectiveness of Russian long-range attacks. Video is generated by grok AI
0:10

🇺🇦 Ukraine has significantly increased the deployment of its domestically produced electronic warfare system “Lima” both on the front lines and in the deep rear. 🟥 Lima is a Ukrainian-made system that does not destroy drones and missiles, but instead disrupts their navigation and alters their course. 🚀 Effect on missiles: Thanks to Lima, missiles lose satellite navigation, causing their accuracy to degrade by approximately 2 kilometers for every 100 kilometers flown. This means a missile aimed at an infrastructure target can ultimately land in an open field. 💰 Cost: One Lima unit costs up to 3 million hryvnia. Protecting a large city requires 30 to 100 stations — approximately €5 million, which is roughly the price of a single Patriot PAC-3 missile. Where physically destroying every threat is too expensive, it is possible to disrupt their guidance systems and force them to miss targets by a significant margin. 🟥 According to Cascade Systems, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have already received more than 400 Lima complexes. Over the past 18 months, the system has suppressed over 20,500 Shahed-type drones and altered the course of dozens of cruise and ballistic missiles. Lima represents one of Ukraine’s most effective and economical innovations in the war. By redirecting rather than destroying incoming threats, it achieves substantial defensive results at a fraction of the cost of traditional air defense systems. Its mass deployment is playing a major role in reducing the effectiveness of Russian long-range attacks. Video is generated by grok AI

NSTRIKE

49,131 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 UNCONFIRMED: Footage is circulating that allegedly shows Israeli fighter jets downed by Iranian air defence systems over Iraqi airspace. If verified, this would mark a significant development — the loss of advanced combat aircraft in contested regional skies and a potential expansion of the conflict footprint beyond national borders. At this stage, there is no official confirmation from Israeli, Iraqi, or independent defence sources regarding aircraft losses. In fast-moving conflicts, recycled or misattributed footage is common, and verification takes time. But if a jet has been shot down, it would represent a major escalation in both military and political terms. Stand by for confirmation.
0:14

🚨 UNCONFIRMED: Footage is circulating that allegedly shows Israeli fighter jets downed by Iranian air defence systems over Iraqi airspace. If verified, this would mark a significant development — the loss of advanced combat aircraft in contested regional skies and a potential expansion of the conflict footprint beyond national borders. At this stage, there is no official confirmation from Israeli, Iraqi, or independent defence sources regarding aircraft losses. In fast-moving conflicts, recycled or misattributed footage is common, and verification takes time. But if a jet has been shot down, it would represent a major escalation in both military and political terms. Stand by for confirmation.

Jim Ferguson

2,197,506 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Major Pakistani 🇵🇰 Losses in IAF 🇮🇳 Strikes during operation Sindoor. - Key Aerial Losses: • 6 Pakistan Air Force fighter jets were shot down during the operations. - 2 high-value aerial assets were destroyed. • One was Saab Erieye AEW&C, targeted at the Bholari airbase. • The 2nd, potentially an electronic countermeasures aircraft, was neutralized by a long-range S-400 missile strike from nearly 300 km away. - Transport Aircraft destroyed • 1 C-130 transport aircraft was taken out by an Indian drone strike in Pakistani Punjab. - Unmanned Assets and Cruise Missiles: • Over 10 UCAVs, including Chinese-origin Wing Loong drones, were destroyed. Both on the ground in hangars and during flight using IAF’s air defense systems. - Multiple missiles intercepted and destroyed • A large number of Pakistani cruise and ballistic missiles (approx 30+) were intercepted mid-air before reaching their intended targets on Indian airbases.
0:17

Major Pakistani 🇵🇰 Losses in IAF 🇮🇳 Strikes during operation Sindoor. - Key Aerial Losses: • 6 Pakistan Air Force fighter jets were shot down during the operations. - 2 high-value aerial assets were destroyed. • One was Saab Erieye AEW&C, targeted at the Bholari airbase. • The 2nd, potentially an electronic countermeasures aircraft, was neutralized by a long-range S-400 missile strike from nearly 300 km away. - Transport Aircraft destroyed • 1 C-130 transport aircraft was taken out by an Indian drone strike in Pakistani Punjab. - Unmanned Assets and Cruise Missiles: • Over 10 UCAVs, including Chinese-origin Wing Loong drones, were destroyed. Both on the ground in hangars and during flight using IAF’s air defense systems. - Multiple missiles intercepted and destroyed • A large number of Pakistani cruise and ballistic missiles (approx 30+) were intercepted mid-air before reaching their intended targets on Indian airbases.

Defence Core

32,852 просмотров • 1 год назад

Ukraine’s drone forces have pulled off something genuinely significant at Donetsk Airport. The 14th Regiment of Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Forces has established what they call “fire control” over the Russian-held facility, destroying launch pads, vehicles, and supply depots in a sustained campaign that has rendered the airport effectively unusable. The target was not chosen at random. Russia had transformed the airport into a dual-purpose military asset: a launch site for Shahed-type attack drones and a logistics hub feeding front-line operations in the Donetsk region. Taking it out of commission disrupts both functions simultaneously. What makes this operation notable is its place within a larger strategic framework. Ukraine is pursuing what the BBC describes as a “logistics lockdown” strategy, using AI-guided drones to systematically dismantle Russian supply infrastructure behind the front lines rather than concentrating solely on direct battlefield engagements. The logic is straightforward: an army that cannot resupply cannot sustain offensive pressure. Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Forces described this as the first operation of its kind in modern military history, a claim that reflects how novel drone-on-infrastructure warfare at this scale and precision actually is. Ukraine is increasingly using autonomous, and AI-assisted drones not just to harass but to degrade Russian operational capacity at depth.
0:10

Ukraine’s drone forces have pulled off something genuinely significant at Donetsk Airport. The 14th Regiment of Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Forces has established what they call “fire control” over the Russian-held facility, destroying launch pads, vehicles, and supply depots in a sustained campaign that has rendered the airport effectively unusable. The target was not chosen at random. Russia had transformed the airport into a dual-purpose military asset: a launch site for Shahed-type attack drones and a logistics hub feeding front-line operations in the Donetsk region. Taking it out of commission disrupts both functions simultaneously. What makes this operation notable is its place within a larger strategic framework. Ukraine is pursuing what the BBC describes as a “logistics lockdown” strategy, using AI-guided drones to systematically dismantle Russian supply infrastructure behind the front lines rather than concentrating solely on direct battlefield engagements. The logic is straightforward: an army that cannot resupply cannot sustain offensive pressure. Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Forces described this as the first operation of its kind in modern military history, a claim that reflects how novel drone-on-infrastructure warfare at this scale and precision actually is. Ukraine is increasingly using autonomous, and AI-assisted drones not just to harass but to degrade Russian operational capacity at depth.

Gandalv

309,288 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Many people online speculate that the drones spotted in New Jersey might be the PteroDynamics Transwing X-P4. This drone transitions between two configurations: a quadcopter mode (7 feet by 4 feet) for vertical takeoff and landing and a fixed-wing airplane mode (7 feet by 13 feet) for efficient flight. PteroDynamics has contracts with the U.S. Navy, which tests drones at the Naval Air Station at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey. The company has also carried out test flights from the flight deck of the USNS Burlington, which is currently stationed in New Jersey. This capability might explain the drone sightings reported from the sea. These sightings are likely tied to classified U.S. Navy drone testing, which explains the federal government’s silence on the matter. If these drones are not the PteroDynamics X-P4, they are likely similar unmanned aerial systems being evaluated by the U.S. military. That's the most logical explanation for why the federal government is allowing these operations to happen. At this point, it appears to be as much an experiment in psychological operations as it is a test of drone technology.
0:17

Many people online speculate that the drones spotted in New Jersey might be the PteroDynamics Transwing X-P4. This drone transitions between two configurations: a quadcopter mode (7 feet by 4 feet) for vertical takeoff and landing and a fixed-wing airplane mode (7 feet by 13 feet) for efficient flight. PteroDynamics has contracts with the U.S. Navy, which tests drones at the Naval Air Station at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey. The company has also carried out test flights from the flight deck of the USNS Burlington, which is currently stationed in New Jersey. This capability might explain the drone sightings reported from the sea. These sightings are likely tied to classified U.S. Navy drone testing, which explains the federal government’s silence on the matter. If these drones are not the PteroDynamics X-P4, they are likely similar unmanned aerial systems being evaluated by the U.S. military. That's the most logical explanation for why the federal government is allowing these operations to happen. At this point, it appears to be as much an experiment in psychological operations as it is a test of drone technology.

KanekoaTheGreat

591,015 просмотров • 1 год назад

The faggots showed “routes of Ukrainian drones” to the Leningrad region — through the territory of Belarus and NATO countries (Picture #1). Now let’s look at reality, confirmed exclusively by their own official sources. Here’s how the air raid alerts developed in Russia on these days: Video for March 23 (Video #1) Video for March 25 (Video #2) Video for March 26 (Video #3) We’ve been working for a long time on our own website — an independent analog of the Ukrainian air alert site, but for the Russian swamps. It shows not only the alerts, but also the work of their air defense. We just managed to finish the recording and history function right before the strikes on the Leningrad region. Interesting detail: as soon as an air alert is declared in the Leningrad region itself, literally a few minutes later it is immediately announced in the Bryansk, Smolensk, Tver, and other regions that lie “on the way” to Leningrad. We do not rule out that the drones could have flown over the eastern districts of Belarus. That option is theoretically possible. However, there is zero confirmation: Belarusian chats in those areas were silent, locals wrote nothing, and no objective evidence (video or photos) has appeared. A simple logical question for all their “experts”: If our drones were not flying over Russian territory, but somehow cruising through NATO countries, then why the fuck did you declare air alerts across the entire country? What exactly were your air defense systems “shooting down” over your own regions? Why did the alerts trigger exactly in the regions that, according to your version, the drones never flew over? And the most interesting part — why does this alert pattern lead perfectly straight to the Leningrad region, where real strikes and fires occurred on exactly those dates? - Night of March 23 — massive attack on the Primorsk port (one of the key oil terminals on the Baltic). A fuel tank was damaged, and the fire burned for over a day. Governor Drozdenco claimed “over 50 drones shot down.” - Night of March 25 — strikes on the Ust-Luga port (Novatek terminal) and Vyborg (a ship was damaged, likely the icebreaker “Purga”, and the port itself). Fire in the port. They claimed “33 drones shot down.” - Night of March 26 — attack on the Kirishi Oil Refinery (KINEF) industrial zone. Fires confirmed by NASA FIRMS satellite imagery. They claimed “21+ drones shot down.” You faggots, when you lie about “routes through NATO”, at least try to coordinate your bullshit with your own official data. The picture is hilarious: alerts across the whole country, air defense working at full capacity, “hundreds shot down” — yet the drones supposedly “never flew over Russia.” Draw your own conclusions, friends. Logic has never been Russian propaganda’s strong suit.
0:16

The faggots showed “routes of Ukrainian drones” to the Leningrad region — through the territory of Belarus and NATO countries (Picture #1). Now let’s look at reality, confirmed exclusively by their own official sources. Here’s how the air raid alerts developed in Russia on these days: Video for March 23 (Video #1) Video for March 25 (Video #2) Video for March 26 (Video #3) We’ve been working for a long time on our own website — an independent analog of the Ukrainian air alert site, but for the Russian swamps. It shows not only the alerts, but also the work of their air defense. We just managed to finish the recording and history function right before the strikes on the Leningrad region. Interesting detail: as soon as an air alert is declared in the Leningrad region itself, literally a few minutes later it is immediately announced in the Bryansk, Smolensk, Tver, and other regions that lie “on the way” to Leningrad. We do not rule out that the drones could have flown over the eastern districts of Belarus. That option is theoretically possible. However, there is zero confirmation: Belarusian chats in those areas were silent, locals wrote nothing, and no objective evidence (video or photos) has appeared. A simple logical question for all their “experts”: If our drones were not flying over Russian territory, but somehow cruising through NATO countries, then why the fuck did you declare air alerts across the entire country? What exactly were your air defense systems “shooting down” over your own regions? Why did the alerts trigger exactly in the regions that, according to your version, the drones never flew over? And the most interesting part — why does this alert pattern lead perfectly straight to the Leningrad region, where real strikes and fires occurred on exactly those dates? - Night of March 23 — massive attack on the Primorsk port (one of the key oil terminals on the Baltic). A fuel tank was damaged, and the fire burned for over a day. Governor Drozdenco claimed “over 50 drones shot down.” - Night of March 25 — strikes on the Ust-Luga port (Novatek terminal) and Vyborg (a ship was damaged, likely the icebreaker “Purga”, and the port itself). Fire in the port. They claimed “33 drones shot down.” - Night of March 26 — attack on the Kirishi Oil Refinery (KINEF) industrial zone. Fires confirmed by NASA FIRMS satellite imagery. They claimed “21+ drones shot down.” You faggots, when you lie about “routes through NATO”, at least try to coordinate your bullshit with your own official data. The picture is hilarious: alerts across the whole country, air defense working at full capacity, “hundreds shot down” — yet the drones supposedly “never flew over Russia.” Draw your own conclusions, friends. Logic has never been Russian propaganda’s strong suit.

DroneBomber

94,375 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇺🇦🇷🇺Ukrainian SBU kamikaze drones strike two Russian military support ships under construction and S-400 air defense elements at Kerch’s Zaliv shipyard in occupied Crimea. 🇺🇦🎯 The Security Service of Ukraine’s kamikaze drones struck two Russian military support ships under construction at the “Zaliv” shipyard in occupied Kerch, as well as elements of the S-400 air defense system that were defending the Kerch Strait 🗣️ According to the SBU, the targets included Project 15310 “cable-laying” ships “Volga” and “Vyatka”, as well as the cargo-passenger ferry “Petropavlovsk”, whose construction was reportedly 96% complete. As a result of the strikes, strong fires broke out on the ships. 🚢 Project 15310 “Volga” and “Vyatka” are military special ships built for the Russian Ministry of Defense. Construction of both began in 2015. “Vyatka” was launched in 2020, and “Volga” in 2021. Both ships are still under construction at the “Zaliv” shipyard in occupied Kerch. 🔹 The 140-meter, 10,000+ ton ships are intended for the deployment of Russia’s underwater surveillance network — “Harmony”. ⛴️ “Petropavlovsk” is a CNF22 project cargo-passenger ferry being built at the “Zaliv” shipyard in occupied Kerch. The 120-meter ship, whose construction began in 2020, can accommodate 150 passengers and 28 trucks, or 78 passenger cars. Construction was almost complete…. The estimated cost of the project is approximately 4.5 billion rubles (about $57 million). Video is generated by grok AI
0:10

🇺🇦🇷🇺Ukrainian SBU kamikaze drones strike two Russian military support ships under construction and S-400 air defense elements at Kerch’s Zaliv shipyard in occupied Crimea. 🇺🇦🎯 The Security Service of Ukraine’s kamikaze drones struck two Russian military support ships under construction at the “Zaliv” shipyard in occupied Kerch, as well as elements of the S-400 air defense system that were defending the Kerch Strait 🗣️ According to the SBU, the targets included Project 15310 “cable-laying” ships “Volga” and “Vyatka”, as well as the cargo-passenger ferry “Petropavlovsk”, whose construction was reportedly 96% complete. As a result of the strikes, strong fires broke out on the ships. 🚢 Project 15310 “Volga” and “Vyatka” are military special ships built for the Russian Ministry of Defense. Construction of both began in 2015. “Vyatka” was launched in 2020, and “Volga” in 2021. Both ships are still under construction at the “Zaliv” shipyard in occupied Kerch. 🔹 The 140-meter, 10,000+ ton ships are intended for the deployment of Russia’s underwater surveillance network — “Harmony”. ⛴️ “Petropavlovsk” is a CNF22 project cargo-passenger ferry being built at the “Zaliv” shipyard in occupied Kerch. The 120-meter ship, whose construction began in 2020, can accommodate 150 passengers and 28 trucks, or 78 passenger cars. Construction was almost complete…. The estimated cost of the project is approximately 4.5 billion rubles (about $57 million). Video is generated by grok AI

NSTRIKE

48,166 просмотров • 1 месяц назад