ๆญฃๅœจๅŠ ่ฝฝ่ง†้ข‘...

่ง†้ข‘ๅŠ ่ฝฝๅคฑ่ดฅ

85,603 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 11 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰ โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

9 ๆก่ฏ„่ฎบ

JohnPaul McCrary ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
JohnPaul McCrary11 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Hey @MAGA_X_Times I follow your stuff and appreciate a lot of what you post โ€” you bring attention to stories most people overlook. But on this one? Iโ€™ve gotta let you know: That โ€œApril 4, 1985โ€ IRS memo going around โ€” itโ€™s a fake. I donโ€™t say that lightly. I did the digging myself. Let me walk you through exactly how we know itโ€™s not real โ€” and why this matters. โธป ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ 1. Thereโ€™s no record of this memo inside the IRS. Back in 2011, someone actually filed a federal FOIA lawsuit (Robert v. IRS) demanding the government produce this exact letter. The court forced the IRS to search the 1985 files of the Commissioner. They came up with nothing. Quote from the ruling: โ€œThe IRS did not find the requested letter.โ€ ๐Ÿ‘‰ If this memo had ever existed, thatโ€™s exactly where it wouldโ€™ve been found. It wasnโ€™t. Period. โธป โš–๏ธ 2. The court case it references? Never dismissed. Letโ€™s talk about what the memo claims: That on March 5, 1985, a tax evasion case was filed in Indianapolis by a U.S. attorney named George Duncan, and it was dismissed. But the real case itโ€™s referencing is United States v. Ferguson, tried in Indianapolis that same year. The prosecutorโ€™s name? Roger L. Duncan โ€” not โ€œGeorge.โ€ The outcome? Conviction. Followed by a failed appeal. So the memo got the name wrong, the location right, and completely reversed the verdict. Thatโ€™s not a mistake. Thatโ€™s made-up. โธป ๐Ÿ“œ 3. The 16th Amendment argument? Already been settled. The memo tries to argue that the income tax is illegal because the 16th Amendment was never properly ratified. Hereโ€™s the truth: This claim has been laughed out of court more times than I can count. Supreme Court cases like Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R., and lower court rulings like Miller, Stahl, and Sochia have all affirmed the amendmentโ€™s validity. Even the IRS has an official list of cases where this exact claim was rejected โ€” and they classify it as a frivolous legal argument. โธป ๐Ÿงฉ 4. The memoโ€™s got red flags all over it. Letโ€™s talk how itโ€™s written โ€” and why it doesnโ€™t pass the smell test: โ€ขFormatting: No routing codes, no IRS letterhead conventions. Just a basic typewriter look. โ€ขLanguage: Phrases like โ€œDestroy this memorandumโ€ and โ€œWe will not publish or advertise this findingโ€ sound like something out of a thriller novel โ€” not a government agency. โ€ขLogistics: It suggests the IRS secretly started processing refunds for everyone in America for the last 70+ years โ€” without public notice, budget allocations, or congressional involvement? Come on. Thereโ€™s no trace of any such effort in the Federal Register or appropriations records. Thatโ€™s because it never happened. โธป ๐Ÿง  Final Verdict Hereโ€™s where we land: โ€ขThereโ€™s no record of the memo in official archives. โ€ขThe case it references is real โ€” but the details are fabricated. โ€ขThe constitutional claim has been legally debunked for decades. โ€ขAnd the memo itself is clearly designed to fool people who are already suspicious of the IRS โ€” using emotion, not evidence. This document has been floating around tax-protester circles since the โ€˜90s. Itโ€™s not a leak. Itโ€™s a prop. Itโ€™s disinformation โ€” not suppressed truth. โธป Again โ€” much love and respect. Just wanted to set the record straight on this one. Weโ€™ve got to be sharp, especially when weโ€™re telling people to โ€œlook at this.โ€ Sometimes the enemy wants us chasing ghosts. Letโ€™s not let โ€˜em.

Joseph Banister ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Joseph Banister11 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

This alleged letter from one-time IRS Commissioner Egger is a fake. I asked Attorney Lowell "Larry" Becraft about it the last time I saw an X post about it, which was around early March of 2025. Larry confirmed the letter is fake. This is a direct quote from Larry's reply to me "Shortly after Billโ€™s [Bill Benson's] book was published and lots of people were interested in this issue, a patriot โ€œguruโ€ named Al Carter fabricated a fake letter allegedly authored by IRS Commissioner Roscoe Egger that stated that tax refunds were due because the 16th Amendment had not been ratified.This fake letter was widely distributed and Bill [Benson] and I received countless inquiries about it. Eventually by August, 1985, Bill and I learned that the letter had been fabricated and we talked to Carter about it and he admitted that he was the author of the fake letter." Feel free to learn some true facts about the federal income tax at

Robbie Mouton ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Robbie Mouton11 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

I agree! Stop the taxes.

JP ๐Ÿฅฉ ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
JP ๐Ÿฅฉ11 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Itโ€™s real!

Dahlila ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Dahlila11 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

So what you want to do is bankrupt the United States? So we can be a third world country... We are already $36 trillion in debt. But you want to go after the government for more money that we don't have. That makes a lot of sense. I would be happy if they just stopped income tax...

C. Paul Paskewic ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
C. Paul Paskewic11 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

First, it was ratified by two-thirds of the states. Second, there were 48 states in 1913 which means 32 had to ratify it...not 36 which is two-thirds of 50.

Saul Paxson ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Saul Paxson11 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

You see stop voluntarily paying those Federal Taxes, End the corruption.

NWRain-Judi ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
NWRain-Judi11 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Interesting! Then how can they charge interest on back taxes, if true?

Jane Carroll ็š„ๅคดๅƒ
Jane Carroll11 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

The ratification process in several States was challenged as being rejected.. settled by a judge. Look deeper

็›ธๅ…ณ่ง†้ข‘