Now The Bible is being edited.

This is what happens when you don’t know anything about Bible manuscripts and translations.

Parallel corruption from Mark 9:29, not a conspiracy theory.

@Cmed1994 No its not. Different translations use different manuscripts. That is all. This is not new. The oldest available manuscripts actually do not have Matthew 17:21. If anything the Bibles with this verse are the edited ones.

@Cmed1994 apparently youre incorrect.

The standard is NOT the King James Version. The standard is what the original manuscripts said. Textual criticism and more manuscript evidence since the creation of the KJV so we now know that some of the verses were most likely NOT in the original. More isn't better. Accurate is better. The new bibles don't SUBTRACT verses, the KJV simply ADDED verses. The Catholics and Orthodox have several more books of the bible than we do. Should we add those too?

Boy do we have bad news for you about the history of the Bible.

Martin Luther edited the Bible in the mid 16th century. This isn’t new. The only complete bibles are Catholic. Protestant bibles, every translation, are missing 7 books.

Did you look at the footnotes? Typically they include a note, saying, “some manuscripts do not include verse 21“ Here is a screenshot of a leading commentary on the Greek manuscripts behind our English Bibles.

This verse isn’t in our earliest manuscripts (codex Sianaiticus and Vaticanus) it was added by a later scribe somewhere around the 5th century. More recent translations remove it because it wasn’t originally there

Here is an example of the Bible actually being edited rather than a verse being footnoted only.