Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Now we have MBC news! Both SBS&MBC reported today! 🗣It has been confirmed that an ROk army female nurse officer in her 20s is under investigation for unauthorized visit to the military base where BTS member Jin(real name is Kim Seokjin) is stationed to serve. According to a military...

Jiniya1204's profile picture

Jiniya지니야_RunSeokjin

37,791 subscribers

382,600 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

Seokjin's AC♡ 𓈒𓏸𓈒꙳𓂃 profil fotoğrafı
Seokjin's AC♡ 𓈒𓏸𓈒꙳𓂃3 yıl önce

Thank God media is covering the news.. PROTECT JIN SOUTH KOREA PROTECT JIN KEEP JIN SAFE @BIGHIT_MUSIC @HYBEOFFICIALtwt @ROK_MND @hellopolicy

👨‍🚀 IGIN⁷ | HAPPY 🎈 🌙 🎣 profil fotoğrafı
👨‍🚀 IGIN⁷ | HAPPY 🎈 🌙 🎣3 yıl önce

Thank you so much for sharing and translating the news and keeping us up to date.

TinkOfYou7💜 profil fotoğrafı
TinkOfYou7💜3 yıl önce

THANK YOU FOR SHARING THIS!! 🙏🏼😭😭😭 SOUTH KOREA PROTECT JIN !!!! KEEP JIN SAFE !!!

joon's bonsai profil fotoğrafı
joon's bonsai3 yıl önce

Can't government protect bts ??? Thn y did thy want them to severe military??? Hybe would have taken care of bts more than u .. 😒😒😒

Joon's cross fit⁷🐋 profil fotoğrafı
Joon's cross fit⁷🐋3 yıl önce

I want her in jail idc

J is HAPPY profil fotoğrafı
J is HAPPY3 yıl önce

Relived that they're addressing the matter

ᴮᴱAngelmiakaʷᶦᵗʰ ᵇᵗˢ ⁷⁼¹ profil fotoğrafı
ᴮᴱAngelmiakaʷᶦᵗʰ ᵇᵗˢ ⁷⁼¹3 yıl önce

She had no idea that Jin was stationed in that division while the local and international media already covered his enlistment? Lies! I hope the personnel be tried at court martial. I hope the military does not tamper any evidence in the investigation

reverie⁷ BTS YEAR🌟 profil fotoğrafı
reverie⁷ BTS YEAR🌟3 yıl önce

PROTECT JIN SOUTH KOREA PROTECT JIN KEEP JIN SAFE

who is 𝑵𝒂𝒚𝒂⁷ profil fotoğrafı
who is 𝑵𝒂𝒚𝒂⁷3 yıl önce

PROTECT JIN SOUTH KOREA PROTECT JIN KEEP JIN SAFE

Love_SeokJin🏆BEST BRAND AMBASSADOR JIN🥇🏅 profil fotoğrafı
Love_SeokJin🏆BEST BRAND AMBASSADOR JIN🥇🏅3 yıl önce

SOUTH KOREA PROTECT JIN PROTECT JIN WE LOVE YOU JIN KEEP JIN SAFE SEOKJIN #방탄소년단진 #JIN #TheAstronaut @BTS_twt @ROK_MND @hellopolicy

Benzer Videolar

Lawyer Claims He Was Slapped 22 Times Inside Lonikand Police Station Serious allegations have been made against a police officer attached to Lonikand Police Station. Advocate Sahil Shaikh has alleged that he was assaulted by Policeman Nitin Ponge after questioning the alleged harassment of a citizen. According to the complaint, the advocate was taken to the police station, where he claims he was assaulted even after the officer was informed that he was a lawyer. The complaint further alleges that he was slapped around 22 times. It is also claimed that a video recorded after he reached the police station may serve as evidence. The allegations have prompted demands for an independent investigation into the incident. The police have not yet publicly responded to these claims. These are allegations made in the complaint, and the matter is subject to investigation. Follow Punekar News for verified updates from Pune.
2:58

Lawyer Claims He Was Slapped 22 Times Inside Lonikand Police Station Serious allegations have been made against a police officer attached to Lonikand Police Station. Advocate Sahil Shaikh has alleged that he was assaulted by Policeman Nitin Ponge after questioning the alleged harassment of a citizen. According to the complaint, the advocate was taken to the police station, where he claims he was assaulted even after the officer was informed that he was a lawyer. The complaint further alleges that he was slapped around 22 times. It is also claimed that a video recorded after he reached the police station may serve as evidence. The allegations have prompted demands for an independent investigation into the incident. The police have not yet publicly responded to these claims. These are allegations made in the complaint, and the matter is subject to investigation. Follow Punekar News for verified updates from Pune.

Punekar News

29,707 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

[UNDER INVESTIGATION] An investigation is underway regarding an incident (with video circulated on various social media platforms) whereby a SAPS Constable allegedly assaulted a member of the public. The incident is said to have occurred on 02 April 2026, at the Volksrust Police Station. It is worth noting that in light of the serious allegation, the SAPS has instituted an internal investigation to thoroughly examine the circumstances surrounding the incident. In addition to the internal investigation, a criminal investigation is also underway to ensure all aspects of this matter are addressed transparently. The Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) has been notified of the incident and it is expected that a parallel investigation will be conducted by this Directorate.
0:15

[UNDER INVESTIGATION] An investigation is underway regarding an incident (with video circulated on various social media platforms) whereby a SAPS Constable allegedly assaulted a member of the public. The incident is said to have occurred on 02 April 2026, at the Volksrust Police Station. It is worth noting that in light of the serious allegation, the SAPS has instituted an internal investigation to thoroughly examine the circumstances surrounding the incident. In addition to the internal investigation, a criminal investigation is also underway to ensure all aspects of this matter are addressed transparently. The Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) has been notified of the incident and it is expected that a parallel investigation will be conducted by this Directorate.

Justice, Crime Prevention and Security

60,778 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨 JUST IN: Jonathan Turley pushes back on demands for local involvement in the federal shooting investigation: “This is a federal investigation. They have no basis to insist on being involved.” “The worst person to call for cooperation is Mayor Fry — who rushed to call the officer a murderer.” “This was a fraction of a second — not a kitchen conversation.” “The standard is what the officer saw in that moment. That standard favors the officer.” “Reasonable doesn’t mean right — but it does mean within discretion.”
2:09

🚨 JUST IN: Jonathan Turley pushes back on demands for local involvement in the federal shooting investigation: “This is a federal investigation. They have no basis to insist on being involved.” “The worst person to call for cooperation is Mayor Fry — who rushed to call the officer a murderer.” “This was a fraction of a second — not a kitchen conversation.” “The standard is what the officer saw in that moment. That standard favors the officer.” “Reasonable doesn’t mean right — but it does mean within discretion.”

Laura Ingraham

133,445 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

This is a crazy case of a nurse who was arrest arrested for refusing to take a blood sample of an unconscious patient and hand it over to the Salt Lake City, police. The unconscious patient was hit by a suspected felon during a police chase. The felon hit the truck driver, putting him in an unconscious state in the hospital. The police wanted a blood sample from him. The nurse rightfully under orders from her superiors, and the law cannot just turn over the blood sample without consent from the patient or a warrant.. The police had no such warrant. She even had her hospital administrator sticking up for her, but she was arrested anyway. If she had turned over that blood sample, she would've lost her job as a nurse, and probably her license. In this case, I do not think she was hindering an investigation. My question is why didn't the cops get a warrant? They couldn't have a judge sign off on one? If you were this nurse, what would you have done? It's a terrible position for her to be put in.!!
5:16

This is a crazy case of a nurse who was arrest arrested for refusing to take a blood sample of an unconscious patient and hand it over to the Salt Lake City, police. The unconscious patient was hit by a suspected felon during a police chase. The felon hit the truck driver, putting him in an unconscious state in the hospital. The police wanted a blood sample from him. The nurse rightfully under orders from her superiors, and the law cannot just turn over the blood sample without consent from the patient or a warrant.. The police had no such warrant. She even had her hospital administrator sticking up for her, but she was arrested anyway. If she had turned over that blood sample, she would've lost her job as a nurse, and probably her license. In this case, I do not think she was hindering an investigation. My question is why didn't the cops get a warrant? They couldn't have a judge sign off on one? If you were this nurse, what would you have done? It's a terrible position for her to be put in.!!

Leah Rain ✝️🇺🇸🎸🏝️

456,605 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Man narrates how a Nigerian police officer, identified as Emma Nwangwu k!ll£d a young girl in Nsukka, Enugu State yesterday evening after she had been avoiding him for a long time due to repeated s£xu@l h@r@ssment💔😥 According to the narrator, the officer, Emma Nwangwu, was said to have been previously married to several women, though none reportedly live with him anymore. A relative of the officer allegedly persuaded her cousin, Uloma, to stay with him. From the moment she moved in, the officer was accused of persistently har@ssing her. A few weeks ago, the girl was declared missing but later found. She reportedly explained that she had been running away because of the officer’s actions. On the day of the incident, around 6 p.m., the officer was said to have received information that she was at a pharmacy in Nsukka. He allegedly rushed there, confronted her aggressively, and during the altercation, forcefully pushed her to the ground. She was taken to a hospital but did not survive. The video attached at the end was reportedly recorded just days earlier, where the girl stated that the officer had been thre@tening her and her family, claiming that Nigeria police will not do anything to him.
6:47

Sensitive content

Man narrates how a Nigerian police officer, identified as Emma Nwangwu k!ll£d a young girl in Nsukka, Enugu State yesterday evening after she had been avoiding him for a long time due to repeated s£xu@l h@r@ssment💔😥 According to the narrator, the officer, Emma Nwangwu, was said to have been previously married to several women, though none reportedly live with him anymore. A relative of the officer allegedly persuaded her cousin, Uloma, to stay with him. From the moment she moved in, the officer was accused of persistently har@ssing her. A few weeks ago, the girl was declared missing but later found. She reportedly explained that she had been running away because of the officer’s actions. On the day of the incident, around 6 p.m., the officer was said to have received information that she was at a pharmacy in Nsukka. He allegedly rushed there, confronted her aggressively, and during the altercation, forcefully pushed her to the ground. She was taken to a hospital but did not survive. The video attached at the end was reportedly recorded just days earlier, where the girl stated that the officer had been thre@tening her and her family, claiming that Nigeria police will not do anything to him.

CHUKS 🍥

90,936 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Commissioner Baloyi's sharp mind and articulation never ceases to amaze me. Advocate Sello is also like that. 😅❤️ She lists a whole 10 points for Colonel Jacob, without looking at her notes, just fluently, one reason after another, that led her to a conclusion that the investigation entries entered in his diary, which was after the fact, something they only picked up now when he came to testify, was part of a scheme to give an expression that there was a real investigation, when in fact there was no investigation at all. What I have observed is that the NPA tends to use some of these notes to frame the charges in the criminal case. Jacob and Goodenough Sibiya are deep in trouble I tell you. #MadlangaCommission
4:12

Commissioner Baloyi's sharp mind and articulation never ceases to amaze me. Advocate Sello is also like that. 😅❤️ She lists a whole 10 points for Colonel Jacob, without looking at her notes, just fluently, one reason after another, that led her to a conclusion that the investigation entries entered in his diary, which was after the fact, something they only picked up now when he came to testify, was part of a scheme to give an expression that there was a real investigation, when in fact there was no investigation at all. What I have observed is that the NPA tends to use some of these notes to frame the charges in the criminal case. Jacob and Goodenough Sibiya are deep in trouble I tell you. #MadlangaCommission

Tau e Tshehadi

14,388 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

#WATCH | Bhagalpur, Bihar: A Pakistani woman, who came to India in 1956, has been found to be in Bihar's voter list and was even verified in the SIR carried out in the state. When the Home Ministry started carrying out an investigation regarding foreign nationals who had overstayed their visa period, this woman was identified in Bhagalpur. Investigation has begun, and the process to remove her from the voter list has also been initiated. Booth Level Officer Farzana Khanam says, "... I received a letter from the department with her passport number, which I cross-checked. We have been asked to remove her name. Her name is Imrana Khanam... She was not in a condition to talk; she is old and unwell. As per the orders of the department, I filled out the form and began the process of removing her name. Her passport is of 1956, and she got her visa in 1958. She is from Pakistan... The next step of the investigation will be carried out by the department... I had received a notice from the Home Ministry on 11 August."
1:41

#WATCH | Bhagalpur, Bihar: A Pakistani woman, who came to India in 1956, has been found to be in Bihar's voter list and was even verified in the SIR carried out in the state. When the Home Ministry started carrying out an investigation regarding foreign nationals who had overstayed their visa period, this woman was identified in Bhagalpur. Investigation has begun, and the process to remove her from the voter list has also been initiated. Booth Level Officer Farzana Khanam says, "... I received a letter from the department with her passport number, which I cross-checked. We have been asked to remove her name. Her name is Imrana Khanam... She was not in a condition to talk; she is old and unwell. As per the orders of the department, I filled out the form and began the process of removing her name. Her passport is of 1956, and she got her visa in 1958. She is from Pakistan... The next step of the investigation will be carried out by the department... I had received a notice from the Home Ministry on 11 August."

ANI

76,944 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

#WATCH | Delhi: Speaking on retired Indian Army Major Vikrant Jaitly's case, Vikrant's wife Charul Jaitly's lawyer, Major Sudhanshu Pandey, says, "Vikrant was an ex-army officer... In 2016-17, due to family circumstances, he took premature retirement, and since then, he has set up his own work and has been settled in Dubai, where he is working... What we have been told is that there were some national security issues and cyber issues in respect of some different companies with whom Vikrant may have had some dealings... His wife was trying to find out what exactly had happened... She got in contact with the Ministry of External Affairs; everything was explained to them; Vikrant was given counsellor access; and thereafter, it was said that there are some investigations going on in respect of the case against different people, and during that investigation, it would be necessary for Vikrant to be there... Celina was the one whom she contacted first when she got to know about this, and she did not, at that point in time, come forward in any manner to help—at least, any visible help did not come from them. The case happened on the 6th of September 2023... She followed the protocol... and went about the case the way she was advised... She decided to wait for the case to get over... While Charul was never informed by Celina that she had decided to take any legal recourse in this matter, it would have been better if she had consulted Charul and discussed that this is what she was going to do about this. Charul would have come forward, and they could have taken steps that were in the best interest of Vikrant... The reason for filing the case is that if this was something that was motivated by her genuine concern for her brother, she should have consulted us... But to say that she is not being given information or that his wife is not giving her information, we actually strongly rebut because there are absolutely no such reasons. Charul was going to everybody whom she had a hope would be able to help Vikrant... We have been told that some investigation is in the process for which he is required, and when it is over, we will be able to have a better insight into the disposal of Vikrant." (06.12)
9:52

#WATCH | Delhi: Speaking on retired Indian Army Major Vikrant Jaitly's case, Vikrant's wife Charul Jaitly's lawyer, Major Sudhanshu Pandey, says, "Vikrant was an ex-army officer... In 2016-17, due to family circumstances, he took premature retirement, and since then, he has set up his own work and has been settled in Dubai, where he is working... What we have been told is that there were some national security issues and cyber issues in respect of some different companies with whom Vikrant may have had some dealings... His wife was trying to find out what exactly had happened... She got in contact with the Ministry of External Affairs; everything was explained to them; Vikrant was given counsellor access; and thereafter, it was said that there are some investigations going on in respect of the case against different people, and during that investigation, it would be necessary for Vikrant to be there... Celina was the one whom she contacted first when she got to know about this, and she did not, at that point in time, come forward in any manner to help—at least, any visible help did not come from them. The case happened on the 6th of September 2023... She followed the protocol... and went about the case the way she was advised... She decided to wait for the case to get over... While Charul was never informed by Celina that she had decided to take any legal recourse in this matter, it would have been better if she had consulted Charul and discussed that this is what she was going to do about this. Charul would have come forward, and they could have taken steps that were in the best interest of Vikrant... The reason for filing the case is that if this was something that was motivated by her genuine concern for her brother, she should have consulted us... But to say that she is not being given information or that his wife is not giving her information, we actually strongly rebut because there are absolutely no such reasons. Charul was going to everybody whom she had a hope would be able to help Vikrant... We have been told that some investigation is in the process for which he is required, and when it is over, we will be able to have a better insight into the disposal of Vikrant." (06.12)

ANI

41,692 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Watch the exact moment a traffic stop went from a citation to an arrest over a single piece of plastic. An officer pulls the driver over, stating she failed to come to a complete stop at a stop sign. The driver refuses to physically hand over her driver's license to the officer. Instead, she holds it up so the officer can see the information but refuses to surrender physical possession of the license. She cites a belief that she is not legally required to "hand" the officer her license. ​The officer repeatedly explains that he needs to hold it to verify it as part of the traffic stop. The driver continues to refuse, and the officer orders her to step out of the vehicle. ​The driver eventually steps out of the vehicle after a lengthy debate about the law and her rights. The video concludes with the driver outside her vehicle, continuing to argue her legal stance with the officers and getting arrested for resisting and obstructing law enforcement. ​The Conflict Over "Presenting" a License ​In Florida, as in many states, the requirement to "present" or "submit" a driver's license is not interpreted as merely showing it from a distance. Law enforcement requires physical possession of the document for several operational reasons: ​Authentication: Officers must verify the security features of the card (holograms, tactile elements, etc.) to ensure it is not a counterfeit or an altered document. ​Database Verification: To complete a traffic stop investigation, the officer must run the license through the FCIC/NCIC (Florida Crime Information Center / National Crime Information Center) databases. This check verifies the status of the license (valid, suspended, revoked) and checks for outstanding warrants or other issues. An officer cannot perform this background check without the license number and/or the ability to scan the card. ​The Charge of "Resisting Without Violence" ​While the driver may have provided other documentation, the refusal to surrender the driver's license for verification is viewed by law enforcement as a failure to comply with a lawful order during a traffic stop. ​The Legal Trigger: Under Florida Statute § 843.02, an officer can charge a person with "resisting an officer without violence" if they believe the individual is obstructing them in the "lawful execution of any legal duty." ​The Interpretation of Obstruction: If an officer determines that the driver's refusal to hand over the license prevents them from completing the mandatory identification and background check, they may consider the driver to be intentionally obstructing their investigation. ​The Escalation: Even if the driver was cooperative in other aspects, the persistent refusal to comply with the officer’s instruction to hand over the license can lead to a formal detention and, ultimately, an arrest. The arrest is typically made because the officer determines that the driver is willfully impeding their ability to perform their official duties. ​In court, defense attorneys often argue whether a driver's actions constituted "obstruction" or merely a misunderstanding, but the outcome is highly dependent on the judge's interpretation of whether the driver’s refusal effectively stopped the officer from performing their duties.
9:28

Watch the exact moment a traffic stop went from a citation to an arrest over a single piece of plastic. An officer pulls the driver over, stating she failed to come to a complete stop at a stop sign. The driver refuses to physically hand over her driver's license to the officer. Instead, she holds it up so the officer can see the information but refuses to surrender physical possession of the license. She cites a belief that she is not legally required to "hand" the officer her license. ​The officer repeatedly explains that he needs to hold it to verify it as part of the traffic stop. The driver continues to refuse, and the officer orders her to step out of the vehicle. ​The driver eventually steps out of the vehicle after a lengthy debate about the law and her rights. The video concludes with the driver outside her vehicle, continuing to argue her legal stance with the officers and getting arrested for resisting and obstructing law enforcement. ​The Conflict Over "Presenting" a License ​In Florida, as in many states, the requirement to "present" or "submit" a driver's license is not interpreted as merely showing it from a distance. Law enforcement requires physical possession of the document for several operational reasons: ​Authentication: Officers must verify the security features of the card (holograms, tactile elements, etc.) to ensure it is not a counterfeit or an altered document. ​Database Verification: To complete a traffic stop investigation, the officer must run the license through the FCIC/NCIC (Florida Crime Information Center / National Crime Information Center) databases. This check verifies the status of the license (valid, suspended, revoked) and checks for outstanding warrants or other issues. An officer cannot perform this background check without the license number and/or the ability to scan the card. ​The Charge of "Resisting Without Violence" ​While the driver may have provided other documentation, the refusal to surrender the driver's license for verification is viewed by law enforcement as a failure to comply with a lawful order during a traffic stop. ​The Legal Trigger: Under Florida Statute § 843.02, an officer can charge a person with "resisting an officer without violence" if they believe the individual is obstructing them in the "lawful execution of any legal duty." ​The Interpretation of Obstruction: If an officer determines that the driver's refusal to hand over the license prevents them from completing the mandatory identification and background check, they may consider the driver to be intentionally obstructing their investigation. ​The Escalation: Even if the driver was cooperative in other aspects, the persistent refusal to comply with the officer’s instruction to hand over the license can lead to a formal detention and, ultimately, an arrest. The arrest is typically made because the officer determines that the driver is willfully impeding their ability to perform their official duties. ​In court, defense attorneys often argue whether a driver's actions constituted "obstruction" or merely a misunderstanding, but the outcome is highly dependent on the judge's interpretation of whether the driver’s refusal effectively stopped the officer from performing their duties.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

12,859 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

A routine traffic stop turned into something much bigger after one small license check. An officer ran the license plate on a vehicle and learned the registered owner, Valerie, had a suspended driver's license after failing to pay a traffic ticket. After stopping the vehicle, Valerie appeared genuinely surprised that her license had been suspended. As the conversation continued, the officer noticed she seemed unusually anxious and that one of her hands showed signs of physical wear. Valerie explained she had been doing construction work on a house, but the officer believed her behavior and the marks on her hand warranted further investigation. A second officer arrived to assist, and Valerie was placed under arrest for driving with a suspended license. Because no licensed driver was available to take the vehicle and it was being impounded, officers conducted a standard inventory search—a procedure used to document the contents of a vehicle before it is towed. Although Valerie repeatedly objected, officers explained the search was required under department policy and did not require her consent. During the inventory, officers located multiple paraphernalia in the vehicle's center console. Valerie was ultimately charged with driving under the influence (DUI) and possession of drug paraphernalia under Florida law, in addition to the suspended-license violation.
8:17

A routine traffic stop turned into something much bigger after one small license check. An officer ran the license plate on a vehicle and learned the registered owner, Valerie, had a suspended driver's license after failing to pay a traffic ticket. After stopping the vehicle, Valerie appeared genuinely surprised that her license had been suspended. As the conversation continued, the officer noticed she seemed unusually anxious and that one of her hands showed signs of physical wear. Valerie explained she had been doing construction work on a house, but the officer believed her behavior and the marks on her hand warranted further investigation. A second officer arrived to assist, and Valerie was placed under arrest for driving with a suspended license. Because no licensed driver was available to take the vehicle and it was being impounded, officers conducted a standard inventory search—a procedure used to document the contents of a vehicle before it is towed. Although Valerie repeatedly objected, officers explained the search was required under department policy and did not require her consent. During the inventory, officers located multiple paraphernalia in the vehicle's center console. Valerie was ultimately charged with driving under the influence (DUI) and possession of drug paraphernalia under Florida law, in addition to the suspended-license violation.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

43,995 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

#WATCH | Delhi: Special CP Law & Order Madhup Tiwari says, "Schools had been receiving (bomb threat) emails continuously, it started around 14th February. So, we conducted an in-depth investigation. But due to the usage of VPN etc, it was not easy to get a breakthrough...But we found a technical window regarding the email received on 8th Jan. We zeroed in on a juvenile and found that he sent the mail...We suspected an anti-national or sabotage angle. When we did the profiling of the family of the juvenile as part of the investigation, we found that one of his parents is connected to an organisation with deep connections to an NGO. As per our preliminary info, it was found that the NGO has deep connections to a particular political party. It supports that political party on several issues and had also questioned the legitimacy of the hanging of Afzal Guru. This is a preliminary investigation. Further investigation is yet to be done...He had been sending the mail since the beginning. There are at least 7 instances where we can say that it was he who sent the emails..."
2:55

#WATCH | Delhi: Special CP Law & Order Madhup Tiwari says, "Schools had been receiving (bomb threat) emails continuously, it started around 14th February. So, we conducted an in-depth investigation. But due to the usage of VPN etc, it was not easy to get a breakthrough...But we found a technical window regarding the email received on 8th Jan. We zeroed in on a juvenile and found that he sent the mail...We suspected an anti-national or sabotage angle. When we did the profiling of the family of the juvenile as part of the investigation, we found that one of his parents is connected to an organisation with deep connections to an NGO. As per our preliminary info, it was found that the NGO has deep connections to a particular political party. It supports that political party on several issues and had also questioned the legitimacy of the hanging of Afzal Guru. This is a preliminary investigation. Further investigation is yet to be done...He had been sending the mail since the beginning. There are at least 7 instances where we can say that it was he who sent the emails..."

ANI

12,386 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Detroit police officer placed on administrative duty after video shows him punching a handcuffed man with his hands behind his back Police responded to a call at a home in Detroit, but details about what led up to it are still unclear The officer involved has been pulled from active duty while the investigation is ongoing. No identities or possible charges have been released yet
1:28

Detroit police officer placed on administrative duty after video shows him punching a handcuffed man with his hands behind his back Police responded to a call at a home in Detroit, but details about what led up to it are still unclear The officer involved has been pulled from active duty while the investigation is ongoing. No identities or possible charges have been released yet

Unlimited L's

12,360 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

After making further inquiries, I learned that her name is Khadijah and that she was persuaded to delete the video. According to her, the incident occurred in Ogun State, along Abeokuta Road, on Ayetoro Road, just after Alamala Barracks. She also said she later discovered that the officer who called her a "bandit" was not a police officer but an immigration officer. Below is her TikTok handle. "Khadeejah/B"
1:04

After making further inquiries, I learned that her name is Khadijah and that she was persuaded to delete the video. According to her, the incident occurred in Ogun State, along Abeokuta Road, on Ayetoro Road, just after Alamala Barracks. She also said she later discovered that the officer who called her a "bandit" was not a police officer but an immigration officer. Below is her TikTok handle. "Khadeejah/B"

Sulaiman Uwaisu Idris

73,905 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

#WATCH | Noida, UP: Satish Pal, Additional Chief Executive Officer (ACEO) of Noida Authority, says, "Regarding the tragic incident that occurred yesterday in Sector 150, Noida, the Noida Authority is conducting an investigation, and action will be taken after the investigation is complete. The investigation will reveal whose land it was, to whom it was allotted, and who was responsible for its maintenance. That road is in an area that is not yet a fully developed sector... Action will be taken after the investigation."
1:10

#WATCH | Noida, UP: Satish Pal, Additional Chief Executive Officer (ACEO) of Noida Authority, says, "Regarding the tragic incident that occurred yesterday in Sector 150, Noida, the Noida Authority is conducting an investigation, and action will be taken after the investigation is complete. The investigation will reveal whose land it was, to whom it was allotted, and who was responsible for its maintenance. That road is in an area that is not yet a fully developed sector... Action will be taken after the investigation."

ANI

14,972 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

From the Epstein files… It is being said that in this video a young girl is approached in a friendly manner and then taken away in a vehicle.. There are claims that she was later reported missing and has not been found to this day.. Meanwhile her family is said to have continued demanding justice.. It is deeply concerning that according to these claims full justice has still not been achieved.. This situation highlights the need for truth proper investigation and accountability..?
0:20

From the Epstein files… It is being said that in this video a young girl is approached in a friendly manner and then taken away in a vehicle.. There are claims that she was later reported missing and has not been found to this day.. Meanwhile her family is said to have continued demanding justice.. It is deeply concerning that according to these claims full justice has still not been achieved.. This situation highlights the need for truth proper investigation and accountability..?

Nain Bosan

79,201 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Today October 18, 2024, at at around 11:55 AM, our traffic police officer from Jinja Road Police Station attempted to stop a white Toyota Land Cruiser (reg. No. UBM 439T) driven by a MERCY TIMBITWIRE BASHISHA who had allegedly caused an accident. Despite his signals, the motorist is said to have refused to stop and continued driving while using her phone. After catching up at Lugogo Traffic Lights, it is alleged that she parked at the Uganda Manufacturers Association and locked her vehicle. Our officer asked for her driving permit. she is said to have resorted to intimidation of the officer and later assaulted him. She went further to confiscate the police EPS gadget two phones belonging to the police officer. She is currently under detention as investigations are being conducted.
0:31

Today October 18, 2024, at at around 11:55 AM, our traffic police officer from Jinja Road Police Station attempted to stop a white Toyota Land Cruiser (reg. No. UBM 439T) driven by a MERCY TIMBITWIRE BASHISHA who had allegedly caused an accident. Despite his signals, the motorist is said to have refused to stop and continued driving while using her phone. After catching up at Lugogo Traffic Lights, it is alleged that she parked at the Uganda Manufacturers Association and locked her vehicle. Our officer asked for her driving permit. she is said to have resorted to intimidation of the officer and later assaulted him. She went further to confiscate the police EPS gadget two phones belonging to the police officer. She is currently under detention as investigations are being conducted.

Uganda Police Force

438,811 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Another example of a "moment of not thinking" turned a civil parking dispute into a criminal arrest record. ​The dispute appears to have started over a parking lot disagreement. According to the officers on the scene: ​The woman (referred to in the video overlay as "Karen") allegedly opened the other driver's car door and reached inside. ​The other driver—who is seen speaking with the police—wishes to pursue charges for what she describes as an assault and a violation of her personal space. ​The woman in the grey sweatshirt denies the severity of the incident, claiming: ​She has anxiety and was having a "moment of not thinking." ​She argues that she didn't "assault" anyone and was merely frustrated because she felt the other driver was blocking her or nearly "rear-ended" her. ​She repeatedly attempts to apologize to the other driver to avoid legal trouble, but the officer prevents her from doing so, stating that the other party does not wish to speak with her and is intent on pressing charges. ​The officers emphasize that regardless of the initial "beef" over parking, reaching into someone else's vehicle is a serious legal matter, which is why they are treating it as a criminal complaint rather than a simple argument. The progression of the incident led to several definitive legal steps: ​Criminal Complaint: The victim (the driver of the other car) explicitly stated her intent to press charges. In the video, the officer confirms to the woman in the grey, "She wants to pursue the complaint." ​The Charge: The primary issue was not just the argument over the parking spot, but the fact that the woman opened the other driver's car door. In most jurisdictions, this can be classified as Burglary of a Conveyance (entering a vehicle with intent to commit an offense) or Battery/Assault, depending on the level of physical contact. ​Failed De-escalation: The woman repeatedly tried to apologize ("Can I just say sorry?"), but the officer denied the request because once a victim decides to press charges and a crime (reaching into the car) has been committed, an apology doesn't "cancel" the legal process. ​The Handcuffs: In the final segments of the footage, the officer directs her to turn around and places her in handcuffs, informing her she is being detained/arrested based on the victim's sworn statement and the physical evidence of her opening the door.
3:47

Another example of a "moment of not thinking" turned a civil parking dispute into a criminal arrest record. ​The dispute appears to have started over a parking lot disagreement. According to the officers on the scene: ​The woman (referred to in the video overlay as "Karen") allegedly opened the other driver's car door and reached inside. ​The other driver—who is seen speaking with the police—wishes to pursue charges for what she describes as an assault and a violation of her personal space. ​The woman in the grey sweatshirt denies the severity of the incident, claiming: ​She has anxiety and was having a "moment of not thinking." ​She argues that she didn't "assault" anyone and was merely frustrated because she felt the other driver was blocking her or nearly "rear-ended" her. ​She repeatedly attempts to apologize to the other driver to avoid legal trouble, but the officer prevents her from doing so, stating that the other party does not wish to speak with her and is intent on pressing charges. ​The officers emphasize that regardless of the initial "beef" over parking, reaching into someone else's vehicle is a serious legal matter, which is why they are treating it as a criminal complaint rather than a simple argument. The progression of the incident led to several definitive legal steps: ​Criminal Complaint: The victim (the driver of the other car) explicitly stated her intent to press charges. In the video, the officer confirms to the woman in the grey, "She wants to pursue the complaint." ​The Charge: The primary issue was not just the argument over the parking spot, but the fact that the woman opened the other driver's car door. In most jurisdictions, this can be classified as Burglary of a Conveyance (entering a vehicle with intent to commit an offense) or Battery/Assault, depending on the level of physical contact. ​Failed De-escalation: The woman repeatedly tried to apologize ("Can I just say sorry?"), but the officer denied the request because once a victim decides to press charges and a crime (reaching into the car) has been committed, an apology doesn't "cancel" the legal process. ​The Handcuffs: In the final segments of the footage, the officer directs her to turn around and places her in handcuffs, informing her she is being detained/arrested based on the victim's sworn statement and the physical evidence of her opening the door.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

25,249 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Parsi: There is no doubt that we have now, after 20 years of hearing from the hawks, that the only solution is to go to war, we tried it. One third of the U.S. Navy was there in the region. This was not a small operation. This was a major operation short of an actual invasion, and it failed. There is just no doubt that the military operation was not a success. And hopefully, at a minimum, we will not be having that debate again. It has now been settled. It's no longer a theoretical or academic topic. It has been tried, proven to be a failure.
2:04

Parsi: There is no doubt that we have now, after 20 years of hearing from the hawks, that the only solution is to go to war, we tried it. One third of the U.S. Navy was there in the region. This was not a small operation. This was a major operation short of an actual invasion, and it failed. There is just no doubt that the military operation was not a success. And hopefully, at a minimum, we will not be having that debate again. It has now been settled. It's no longer a theoretical or academic topic. It has been tried, proven to be a failure.

Acyn

133,670 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

From the Epstein files… It is being reported that in this video a young girl is approached in a friendly way and then taken away in a vehicle.. There are claims that she was later declared missing and has not been found to this day.. Meanwhile her family is said to have continued seeking justice.. It is deeply concerning that, according to these claims, full justice has still not been delivered.. This situation highlights the need for truth, proper investigation, and accountability..?
0:21

From the Epstein files… It is being reported that in this video a young girl is approached in a friendly way and then taken away in a vehicle.. There are claims that she was later declared missing and has not been found to this day.. Meanwhile her family is said to have continued seeking justice.. It is deeply concerning that, according to these claims, full justice has still not been delivered.. This situation highlights the need for truth, proper investigation, and accountability..?

𓆩𝐀𝐛𝐢𝐝 𝐇𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐧𓆪

13,754 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

A Muslim young woman working at Gaurav Dental Clinic in Kala Aam area of Bulandshahr has made a serious allegation of rape against her operator. The victim’s family has submitted a complaint at Kotwali Nagar against the accused doctor and demanded action. According to the victim, she had been working at the said dentist’s clinic as a nurse for the past about three years. It is alleged that the doctor called her into his room on the pretext of making tea and there forcibly raped her. After the incident, the young woman told the entire matter to her family. After this, the family took her to the Kotwali and filed a complaint against the accused. The family has accused the police of delay in taking action. The victim is said to be a resident of Bhud Shanti Nagar area. Police officials said that the case is being investigated on the basis of the received complaint. After the investigation is completed, necessary legal action will be taken.
1:54

A Muslim young woman working at Gaurav Dental Clinic in Kala Aam area of Bulandshahr has made a serious allegation of rape against her operator. The victim’s family has submitted a complaint at Kotwali Nagar against the accused doctor and demanded action. According to the victim, she had been working at the said dentist’s clinic as a nurse for the past about three years. It is alleged that the doctor called her into his room on the pretext of making tea and there forcibly raped her. After the incident, the young woman told the entire matter to her family. After this, the family took her to the Kotwali and filed a complaint against the accused. The family has accused the police of delay in taking action. The victim is said to be a resident of Bhud Shanti Nagar area. Police officials said that the case is being investigated on the basis of the received complaint. After the investigation is completed, necessary legal action will be taken.

The Muslim Matter India

15,736 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce