Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Now your AI agents can do customer research by using simulated humans that are based on real humans. In other words, a new way of building your business is here. Rehearsals cofounder Liam Bolling gives me one of the most interesting conversations about the future of business that I've...

Scobleizer's profile picture

Robert Scoble

589,958 subscribers

14,355 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Corporations that are purely AI and robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop You can think of it like how 'computer' used to be a job that humans had. You would go and get a job as a computer where you would do calculations. They had entire skyscrapers full of humans....20, 30 floors of humans...just doing calculations. Now, that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet. That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers So, you think about it: what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer. And so, really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop. It will happen very quickly
1:22

Corporations that are purely AI and robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop You can think of it like how 'computer' used to be a job that humans had. You would go and get a job as a computer where you would do calculations. They had entire skyscrapers full of humans....20, 30 floors of humans...just doing calculations. Now, that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet. That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers So, you think about it: what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer. And so, really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop. It will happen very quickly

X Freeze

16,849,672 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

A little sneak peak at what I am building with Brayden Levangie using the X API. A new kind of personalized X is now possible. And it comes with many side benefits I haven’t yet shown here. Like feeds for your OpenClaw🦞 And reports that go way being what you can make with AIs that aren’t cognitive architectures. This is how I keep up now on the AI industry here on X. Looking for help to turn this into a business. Sponsors and customers who need much better reports on what is happening right now. What do you wish this effort would show you? By the way. I did ask this without writing a line of code. Brayden’s agents did it all.
6:16

A little sneak peak at what I am building with Brayden Levangie using the X API. A new kind of personalized X is now possible. And it comes with many side benefits I haven’t yet shown here. Like feeds for your OpenClaw🦞 And reports that go way being what you can make with AIs that aren’t cognitive architectures. This is how I keep up now on the AI industry here on X. Looking for help to turn this into a business. Sponsors and customers who need much better reports on what is happening right now. What do you wish this effort would show you? By the way. I did ask this without writing a line of code. Brayden’s agents did it all.

Robert Scoble

67,675 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Elon Musk explains why fully autonomous businesses will win “Some of this is going to sound kind of doomerish, but corporations that are purely AI robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop” “Like computer used to be a job that humans had and they’d have like entire skyscrapers full of humans just doing calculations. Now that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet” “That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers. So you can think about, okay, well what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer” “Really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop and this will happen very quickly”
1:21

Elon Musk explains why fully autonomous businesses will win “Some of this is going to sound kind of doomerish, but corporations that are purely AI robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop” “Like computer used to be a job that humans had and they’d have like entire skyscrapers full of humans just doing calculations. Now that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet” “That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers. So you can think about, okay, well what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer” “Really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop and this will happen very quickly”

Jack

61,503 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

.atlas on the reason he thinks Bay Area AI researchers are missing something obvious about the economy: "I do properly think that researchers here in the Bay Area fundamentally misunderstand economics and the idea that humans transact with other humans." "We can have all the infrastructure, right, the API endpoints, agents interacting with other agents, those sorts of things. But I do think people here in the Bay Area, we index so much off of software and the recursive self-improvement of software." "This idea of software-only singularity, I do think we're probably closer to that." "But people like Liam Fedus building Periodic Labs, trying to gather data in the real world, building with atoms and not bits, there's just such a lag."
1:36

.atlas on the reason he thinks Bay Area AI researchers are missing something obvious about the economy: "I do properly think that researchers here in the Bay Area fundamentally misunderstand economics and the idea that humans transact with other humans." "We can have all the infrastructure, right, the API endpoints, agents interacting with other agents, those sorts of things. But I do think people here in the Bay Area, we index so much off of software and the recursive self-improvement of software." "This idea of software-only singularity, I do think we're probably closer to that." "But people like Liam Fedus building Periodic Labs, trying to gather data in the real world, building with atoms and not bits, there's just such a lag."

MTS

11,147 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Elon Musk on the importance of establishing the right values ​​in AGI: “I don't think anyone's ultimately going to have control over digital superintelligence any more than, say, a chimp would have control over humans. Like chimps don't have control over humans. There's nothing they could do. But I do think that it matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you instill in the AI. And my opinion on AI safety is, the most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking, like that you don't force the AI to believe things that are false.”
0:41

Elon Musk on the importance of establishing the right values ​​in AGI: “I don't think anyone's ultimately going to have control over digital superintelligence any more than, say, a chimp would have control over humans. Like chimps don't have control over humans. There's nothing they could do. But I do think that it matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you instill in the AI. And my opinion on AI safety is, the most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking, like that you don't force the AI to believe things that are false.”

Eva Fo𝕏 🦊 Claudius Nero's Legion

1,010,874 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Kira Noir: The Interview. Never thought that I would ever finish a Kira Noir Podcast video, but here we are. I learnt more in few minutes of this Podcast, than i did 4 years in high school. Sometimes, the most unexpected conversations teach you the most.
3:41

Kira Noir: The Interview. Never thought that I would ever finish a Kira Noir Podcast video, but here we are. I learnt more in few minutes of this Podcast, than i did 4 years in high school. Sometimes, the most unexpected conversations teach you the most.

Styke

149,673 просмотров • 23 дней назад

How is the Web changing due to AI? This visit to TinyFish yesterday goes deeply into just how. TinyFish makes a new kind of web browser. One that is started virtually. It is like a Google Chrome in the cloud. But it is very smart, can read and use any website, and your AI agents can talk to it. Here we talk about what it all means for business and the future of robots, brain computer interfaces, and AI glasses. It lets you build systems that can look at MANY websites at the same time and build new kinds of apps to do all sorts of new things.
1:02:10

How is the Web changing due to AI? This visit to TinyFish yesterday goes deeply into just how. TinyFish makes a new kind of web browser. One that is started virtually. It is like a Google Chrome in the cloud. But it is very smart, can read and use any website, and your AI agents can talk to it. Here we talk about what it all means for business and the future of robots, brain computer interfaces, and AI glasses. It lets you build systems that can look at MANY websites at the same time and build new kinds of apps to do all sorts of new things.

Robert Scoble

16,341 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🧠David Friedberg explains the great hope of Artificial Superintelligence: Massive leverage on time to solve thousand-year problems "I don't think that humans are limited in our ability to solve problems." "I think we're limited in terms of time, and what digital intelligence gives us is leverage on time so that we can now tackle ever more complex tasks." "This idea of superintelligence is that it could give us immense leverage in solving that complex problem that we otherwise may be challenged to solve over decades, or hundreds of years, or think about one day solving a problem that would take humans thousands of years to solve." "So if I as a human said, 'I would like to harness fusion power similar to what the sun uses to make energy, and I wanna do that on Earth,' today, we're in, call it year 40 or 50 of a research cycle of humans trying to solve that particularly complex problem." "It's a scientific problem, it's a discovery problem, it's an engineering problem." "Functionally, leveraging to complexity is where this becomes super compelling for humans." "And it's why I think we can and should be highly optimistic about living very long lives, and traveling anywhere we want, and having abundance in food, and having abundance in resources, and having abundance in recouping our time to do the things we want to do instead of the things that we have to do today."
1:04

🧠David Friedberg explains the great hope of Artificial Superintelligence: Massive leverage on time to solve thousand-year problems "I don't think that humans are limited in our ability to solve problems." "I think we're limited in terms of time, and what digital intelligence gives us is leverage on time so that we can now tackle ever more complex tasks." "This idea of superintelligence is that it could give us immense leverage in solving that complex problem that we otherwise may be challenged to solve over decades, or hundreds of years, or think about one day solving a problem that would take humans thousands of years to solve." "So if I as a human said, 'I would like to harness fusion power similar to what the sun uses to make energy, and I wanna do that on Earth,' today, we're in, call it year 40 or 50 of a research cycle of humans trying to solve that particularly complex problem." "It's a scientific problem, it's a discovery problem, it's an engineering problem." "Functionally, leveraging to complexity is where this becomes super compelling for humans." "And it's why I think we can and should be highly optimistic about living very long lives, and traveling anywhere we want, and having abundance in food, and having abundance in resources, and having abundance in recouping our time to do the things we want to do instead of the things that we have to do today."

The All-In Podcast

53,187 просмотров • 1 год назад

Mark Cuban says AI will split every company into 2 categories within 3 years "When it's all said and done over the next 3 years, there's going to be two types of companies. Those who are great at AI and those who went out of business" "The biggest challenge for a company is going to be for the CEO to make that decision that we're going to have to blow up a lot of what we do to recreate our company" "We hear a lot of stories about huge public companies that spend a lot of money to try to implement AI and it doesn't really get them a return on investment." "Because you already are running your business the way you've always run it." "The things you've considered outsourcing, your customer call centers, AI agents are perfect for. The stuff you would give to an intern, AI agents are perfect for" "But to really take advantage of AI you have to reformulate your business completely to build it on AI"
5:18

Mark Cuban says AI will split every company into 2 categories within 3 years "When it's all said and done over the next 3 years, there's going to be two types of companies. Those who are great at AI and those who went out of business" "The biggest challenge for a company is going to be for the CEO to make that decision that we're going to have to blow up a lot of what we do to recreate our company" "We hear a lot of stories about huge public companies that spend a lot of money to try to implement AI and it doesn't really get them a return on investment." "Because you already are running your business the way you've always run it." "The things you've considered outsourcing, your customer call centers, AI agents are perfect for. The stuff you would give to an intern, AI agents are perfect for" "But to really take advantage of AI you have to reformulate your business completely to build it on AI"

Jaynit

196,796 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

So now that John has made these attached comments......I personally HAVE EVER only knew of ONE United Cajun Navy !!! I have never known there to be a OTHER UNITED CAJUN NAVY!!!! So.....DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH..........BUT I stand by my comment.......THE REAL UNITED CAJUN NAVY are DAMN GOOD PEOPLE!!!
3:15

So now that John has made these attached comments......I personally HAVE EVER only knew of ONE United Cajun Navy !!! I have never known there to be a OTHER UNITED CAJUN NAVY!!!! So.....DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH..........BUT I stand by my comment.......THE REAL UNITED CAJUN NAVY are DAMN GOOD PEOPLE!!!

Capt KEVman!!!

31,446 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Peter Daszak argues the research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology did not constitute gain-of-function research. Why? Because it fell outside of the 2017 HHS P3CO Framework on gain-of-function research, which only applied to enhancing potential pandemic pathogens—i.e. things that were likely highly virulent in humans already. So the argument is: the research at WIV did not fit the definition of "enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential" because the bat coronaviruses studied there had not been shown to infect humans. So in other words, under this 2017 HHS P3CO Framework, altering a virus that's not infectious in humans to make it highly infectious in humans DID NOT constitute gain-of-function research. Mind-boggling.
0:39

Peter Daszak argues the research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology did not constitute gain-of-function research. Why? Because it fell outside of the 2017 HHS P3CO Framework on gain-of-function research, which only applied to enhancing potential pandemic pathogens—i.e. things that were likely highly virulent in humans already. So the argument is: the research at WIV did not fit the definition of "enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential" because the bat coronaviruses studied there had not been shown to infect humans. So in other words, under this 2017 HHS P3CO Framework, altering a virus that's not infectious in humans to make it highly infectious in humans DID NOT constitute gain-of-function research. Mind-boggling.

Jan Jekielek

33,565 просмотров • 2 лет назад

"H5N1, historically, is very poorly transmissible in humans…The fear is, of course, that H5N1 would evolve in some way, it would be selected—or somebody would engineer it—to make it more infectious in humans." Robert W Malone, MD Researchers over a decade ago indeed conducted gain-of-function research on H5N1 and found four specific mutations that could make it more infectious in humans. And they published the details. It was controversial. And it contributed to the Obama White House pausing funding for gain of function research.
7:52

"H5N1, historically, is very poorly transmissible in humans…The fear is, of course, that H5N1 would evolve in some way, it would be selected—or somebody would engineer it—to make it more infectious in humans." Robert W Malone, MD Researchers over a decade ago indeed conducted gain-of-function research on H5N1 and found four specific mutations that could make it more infectious in humans. And they published the details. It was controversial. And it contributed to the Obama White House pausing funding for gain of function research.

Jan Jekielek

47,024 просмотров • 2 лет назад

OpenAI research scientist Aidan McLaughlin on why the coming AI takeoff will just look like a continuation of the 200,000 year super exponential humans have been on since we evolved out of the savanna: "My one sentence take is that I align a lot with people who expect things to go tremendously quick over the next few years. Of my friends who are into AI, I have 75th to 80th percentile timelines in terms of quickness." "But I am less sympathetic to discontinuities in AI progress or economic progress. I expect the events of the next few years to just be one long continuation of things that we've seen, maybe in the last five years of AI, maybe the last 50 years of the market, maybe the last 200,000 years of evolution." "Leopold had the best one-sentence description I've ever heard. He's like, people just aren't looking at GDP on a long enough time horizon. What you really need to do is look at GDP since 200,000 years ago, since the emergence of homo sapiens, since we evolved out of the savanna." "You can just zoom out and draw a hyperbola on these things. A lot of this is best regressed by a super exponential on long enough time horizons." OpenAI
2:21

OpenAI research scientist Aidan McLaughlin on why the coming AI takeoff will just look like a continuation of the 200,000 year super exponential humans have been on since we evolved out of the savanna: "My one sentence take is that I align a lot with people who expect things to go tremendously quick over the next few years. Of my friends who are into AI, I have 75th to 80th percentile timelines in terms of quickness." "But I am less sympathetic to discontinuities in AI progress or economic progress. I expect the events of the next few years to just be one long continuation of things that we've seen, maybe in the last five years of AI, maybe the last 50 years of the market, maybe the last 200,000 years of evolution." "Leopold had the best one-sentence description I've ever heard. He's like, people just aren't looking at GDP on a long enough time horizon. What you really need to do is look at GDP since 200,000 years ago, since the emergence of homo sapiens, since we evolved out of the savanna." "You can just zoom out and draw a hyperbola on these things. A lot of this is best regressed by a super exponential on long enough time horizons." OpenAI

MTS

18,873 просмотров • 20 дней назад

🚨NEW: Scott Adams "BLOWN AWAY" by Trump's "SMART" branding of America as "BEST PLACE TO DO BUSINESS" during Asia trip speech🇺🇸 "That is the smartest thing you'll ever see for the U.S. — because the contrast is that it's dangerous to do business in China." "That would be worth the whole trip — that reframe of America as the best place to do business in the context of all of us knowing that China is the worst place to do business." "This is one of the strongest, best plays you'll ever see an American president do."
2:39

🚨NEW: Scott Adams "BLOWN AWAY" by Trump's "SMART" branding of America as "BEST PLACE TO DO BUSINESS" during Asia trip speech🇺🇸 "That is the smartest thing you'll ever see for the U.S. — because the contrast is that it's dangerous to do business in China." "That would be worth the whole trip — that reframe of America as the best place to do business in the context of all of us knowing that China is the worst place to do business." "This is one of the strongest, best plays you'll ever see an American president do."

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

111,107 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Marc Andreessen explains that America can win the future of manufacturing by building the advanced products of the future in highly automated factories that create well-paying, high-skilled “blue-collar-plus” jobs: “What you have is a large number of jobs, that are, call them ‘blue-collar-plus jobs’, and then also white-collar jobs, and all the associated service jobs around those that are building and maintaining that new kind of plant to build that new kind of thing.” “I think what you can do is you can leap forward on the nature of the product you’re building.” “By the way, if we don’t do that, all of those things are going to get made in China.” “What an amazing story it would be for America in the 21st century, which is we reindustrialize not to build the products of the past but to build the products of the future.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
1:23

Marc Andreessen explains that America can win the future of manufacturing by building the advanced products of the future in highly automated factories that create well-paying, high-skilled “blue-collar-plus” jobs: “What you have is a large number of jobs, that are, call them ‘blue-collar-plus jobs’, and then also white-collar jobs, and all the associated service jobs around those that are building and maintaining that new kind of plant to build that new kind of thing.” “I think what you can do is you can leap forward on the nature of the product you’re building.” “By the way, if we don’t do that, all of those things are going to get made in China.” “What an amazing story it would be for America in the 21st century, which is we reindustrialize not to build the products of the past but to build the products of the future.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

a16z

124,115 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

It is incredible how much I've learned and changed my instruction over the last few years. I have aligned my instruction with the body of research called the science of reading. Here are a few things teachers can say goodbye to in 2023 👋 #sor #knowbetterdobetter #NewYear
0:40

It is incredible how much I've learned and changed my instruction over the last few years. I have aligned my instruction with the body of research called the science of reading. Here are a few things teachers can say goodbye to in 2023 👋 #sor #knowbetterdobetter #NewYear

Melanie Brethour

20,613 просмотров • 3 лет назад

The new company brain. Context is the soul of your company, I learned today. Since I wrote a book, “Age of Context,” years ago I see that context is what we now call our private data. That data should be stored in a way to let AI agents and humans get more and more use out of it. This is precisely what PromptQL does and here Tanmai Gopal goes deep on how it now is a company brain, or, rather, a wiki that everyone updates and uses.
49:34

The new company brain. Context is the soul of your company, I learned today. Since I wrote a book, “Age of Context,” years ago I see that context is what we now call our private data. That data should be stored in a way to let AI agents and humans get more and more use out of it. This is precisely what PromptQL does and here Tanmai Gopal goes deep on how it now is a company brain, or, rather, a wiki that everyone updates and uses.

Robert Scoble

18,341 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад