Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

#NQ Live Execution Opening Range C.E. Short Premise 3 Drives High, -MSS, Premium FVGs Draw On Sellside Liquidity Music Credit: Nevermind The Name - Clouds

I_Am_The_ICT's profile picture

The Inner Circle Trader

825,042 subscribers

137,796 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

#NQ
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

Trader Theory profil fotoğrafı
Trader Theory2 yıl önce

🤣

Ryan profil fotoğrafı
Ryan2 yıl önce

thought u were going radio silent

_eMiniHank profil fotoğrafı
_eMiniHank2 yıl önce

I nailed that too.

Master Fren profil fotoğrafı
Master Fren2 yıl önce

Lol I got that too and the silver bullet! I’m out now. I can’t find all my history it just shows me this. Even on Apex. Thank you for being hard on me. It’s working. 😊💚 Have a great day!

Chris📈 profil fotoğrafı
Chris📈2 yıl önce

CE of the opening range is new to me. Thanks

buyittradeit profil fotoğrafı
buyittradeit2 yıl önce

I am addicted to watching these now.

Unc profil fotoğrafı
Unc2 yıl önce

Mentor, will you be participating in FOMC?

Sharif profil fotoğrafı
Sharif2 yıl önce

Just hit it. Best teacher

Omar’s Diary profil fotoğrafı
Omar’s Diary2 yıl önce

This were my trade today on EURUSD and on NASDAQ Michael what do you think . NASDAQ I took half as partials at +2R and the rest at break even .

daytrader_3 profil fotoğrafı
daytrader_32 yıl önce

got the same trade

Benzer Videolar

#NQ Opening Range Expansion To Sellside Premium FVG\Volume Imbalance Entry Stop Loss Above Premium Wick C.E. Music Credit: The Used - Burning Down The House
2:06

#NQ Opening Range Expansion To Sellside Premium FVG\Volume Imbalance Entry Stop Loss Above Premium Wick C.E. Music Credit: The Used - Burning Down The House

The Inner Circle Trader

172,889 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

NQ Live Execution: Bearish Market Bias NQ retraced higher into a Bearish Breaker with obvious 20556.50 Sellside Liquidity for the taking. Music Credit: The Teskey Brothers - Rain
2:11

NQ Live Execution: Bearish Market Bias NQ retraced higher into a Bearish Breaker with obvious 20556.50 Sellside Liquidity for the taking. Music Credit: The Teskey Brothers - Rain

The Inner Circle Trader

134,345 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

October 03, 2024 Live NQ Execution Lunch Macro, -IFVG Entry, Weekly BISI Draw On Liquidity Music Credit: Plaza - Nobody Knows *This content is not monetized.
2:16

October 03, 2024 Live NQ Execution Lunch Macro, -IFVG Entry, Weekly BISI Draw On Liquidity Music Credit: Plaza - Nobody Knows *This content is not monetized.

The Inner Circle Trader

117,529 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Rookie Sensation ICT at it again... NQ Short Pre-AM Session, FVG To Sellside Liquidity -Breaker & FVG confirmation. *Yes Real Money Executions - Not Demo - Called Live. Music Credit: Groove Armada - Hands Of Time
2:15

Rookie Sensation ICT at it again... NQ Short Pre-AM Session, FVG To Sellside Liquidity -Breaker & FVG confirmation. *Yes Real Money Executions - Not Demo - Called Live. Music Credit: Groove Armada - Hands Of Time

The Inner Circle Trader

190,422 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

NQ Live Execution: I was late getting to the charts this morning... and I can't stay over Price today... this is only a Macro Scalp for Sellside. Music Credit: Nxcre & The Villains - Endless
4:21

NQ Live Execution: I was late getting to the charts this morning... and I can't stay over Price today... this is only a Macro Scalp for Sellside. Music Credit: Nxcre & The Villains - Endless

The Inner Circle Trader

202,007 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

ESU2023 June 13, 2023 Using the Draw On Liquidity that I covered in today's Livestream, I selected my Inversion Breaker for a long, targeted Premium Wick C.E. and Buyside & closed manually to save the Stop. Music Credit: Serhat Durmus - La Câlin
2:16

ESU2023 June 13, 2023 Using the Draw On Liquidity that I covered in today's Livestream, I selected my Inversion Breaker for a long, targeted Premium Wick C.E. and Buyside & closed manually to save the Stop. Music Credit: Serhat Durmus - La Câlin

The Inner Circle Trader

265,453 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

NQ Live Execution on the guidance I shared here this morning... Music Credit: Bruno Mars - Smoking Out The Window *This content is NOT monetized.
2:31

NQ Live Execution on the guidance I shared here this morning... Music Credit: Bruno Mars - Smoking Out The Window *This content is NOT monetized.

The Inner Circle Trader

112,512 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

October 07, 2024 PM Session Live Execution NQ Short as outlined in Livestream. I missed the Turtle Soup Short entry, but used my -Volume Imbalance as entry PD Array. Music Credit: Plaza - Personal *This content is not monetized.
3:36

October 07, 2024 PM Session Live Execution NQ Short as outlined in Livestream. I missed the Turtle Soup Short entry, but used my -Volume Imbalance as entry PD Array. Music Credit: Plaza - Personal *This content is not monetized.

The Inner Circle Trader

183,960 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Study: Consolidation that fails to see Sellside Delivery. 3 lower lows then rally above a Volume Imbalance. Target Buyside Liquidity on Short Sellers. Hard Markets can still yield low hanging fruit... Music Credit: Falling To Pieces - Trauma Bonds *My content is not monetized.
4:01

Study: Consolidation that fails to see Sellside Delivery. 3 lower lows then rally above a Volume Imbalance. Target Buyside Liquidity on Short Sellers. Hard Markets can still yield low hanging fruit... Music Credit: Falling To Pieces - Trauma Bonds *My content is not monetized.

The Inner Circle Trader

119,904 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

November 13 - BIRTHDAY🎉 POST CPI $USDCAD 2R🔒 -Previous Day High Draw on Liquidity -Ny Reversal Profile Relative Strength - DXY bullish>CAD bearish - USDCAD Extreme Bullish Execution -M5 Market Maker Buy Model The MMXM Trader - Called the Price Live (King Level Shit)
0:28

November 13 - BIRTHDAY🎉 POST CPI $USDCAD 2R🔒 -Previous Day High Draw on Liquidity -Ny Reversal Profile Relative Strength - DXY bullish>CAD bearish - USDCAD Extreme Bullish Execution -M5 Market Maker Buy Model The MMXM Trader - Called the Price Live (King Level Shit)

Deva

25,548 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Good way to cap the week on stream. What a tricky 10am range we had but held the conviction for shorts to target a a move back into new week opening gap Price was rejecting key levels and with a nice reaction of the 15min SIBI, we hammered the short - live as always 🎯Targeting 10am hourly open, candle body liquidity, and runner for NWOG Will take it easy tomorrow
0:54

Good way to cap the week on stream. What a tricky 10am range we had but held the conviction for shorts to target a a move back into new week opening gap Price was rejecting key levels and with a nice reaction of the 15min SIBI, we hammered the short - live as always 🎯Targeting 10am hourly open, candle body liquidity, and runner for NWOG Will take it easy tomorrow

JD

28,396 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Something interesting is going to be released soon... ✨ Kitt The Inner Circle Trader "If I had to trade only one model for the rest of my life, considering everything I've publicly disclosed, my choice would be either the second stage of re-distribution in an MMSM or the second stage of re-accumulation in an MMBM. With either of these, I believe I could consistently generate substantial profits without the need to explore alternative strategies. These models rely on specific components of both the buy and sell sides of the market curve, which are directly interconnected. This isn't a matter of identifying support and resistance levels; it's about understanding the logic of order flow. In the case of the market maker sell model, I focus on identifying a pool of liquidity beneath the initial consolidation. When I spot this sellside opportunity, I patiently await a reversal. This reversal should lead to a drop of at least 50% from the smart money's reversal point down to the sellside liquidity. If it achieves this, and then begins to rally once more, I'll look to correlate it with the other side of the curve, where the market previously rallied before reversing. This will provide me with an array that initially signaled a bullish trend but now acts as a reversal indicator. This marks the second stage of distribution or redistribution, and it usually happens swiftly, pushing prices towards the sellside. In essence, I'm waiting for a unicorn setup, where all the pieces align perfectly, and I have everything in my favor. I'll risk 5% on such a trade. This approach involves re-accumulation, where the sellside drops down to 50%, and then I match it with another array to capture the reversal. Now, picture a market maker model involving a consolidation phase where relative equal lows are formed, followed by an upward rally, possibly forming a consolidation that resembles a bull flag pattern. Subsequently, it rallies out of that consolidation. Sometimes, it may create a second stage of re-accumulation as it trades towards a premium array level—a level I consider a liquidity draw. If I'm feeling bullish, I'd aim for that level. I don't necessarily need to be there at the exact moment; I might spot the opportunity later and act accordingly. If it's reacting off of a level, that should offer sellside. So, you know where sellside delivery. The market should drop down. So, I'm anticipating price reacting and reversing at the smart money reversal once it starts to break down. If it goes back up a little bit, that's the smart money reversal. Low risk sell is the next stage and then they'll drop. When we reach the low-risk sell, it's important that the drop reaches at least 50% of the total range from the smart money reversal to the sellside I'm targeting. As long as it accomplishes this, I have confidence that the subsequent rally will reach a premium array on the left side of the curve before the market makes its high and reverses. Why would it do that? Because it's part of a larger continuation. So when and how would I determine when it's going to fail ,that first leg of re-distribution on the sell side, if it doesn't pierce 50% of that range from the smart money reversal down to the sell side liquidity. If it doesn't do that, then it's not going to go down there. It's going to be a continuation of reverse and go the other way." #ict #ICT
6:37

Something interesting is going to be released soon... ✨ Kitt The Inner Circle Trader "If I had to trade only one model for the rest of my life, considering everything I've publicly disclosed, my choice would be either the second stage of re-distribution in an MMSM or the second stage of re-accumulation in an MMBM. With either of these, I believe I could consistently generate substantial profits without the need to explore alternative strategies. These models rely on specific components of both the buy and sell sides of the market curve, which are directly interconnected. This isn't a matter of identifying support and resistance levels; it's about understanding the logic of order flow. In the case of the market maker sell model, I focus on identifying a pool of liquidity beneath the initial consolidation. When I spot this sellside opportunity, I patiently await a reversal. This reversal should lead to a drop of at least 50% from the smart money's reversal point down to the sellside liquidity. If it achieves this, and then begins to rally once more, I'll look to correlate it with the other side of the curve, where the market previously rallied before reversing. This will provide me with an array that initially signaled a bullish trend but now acts as a reversal indicator. This marks the second stage of distribution or redistribution, and it usually happens swiftly, pushing prices towards the sellside. In essence, I'm waiting for a unicorn setup, where all the pieces align perfectly, and I have everything in my favor. I'll risk 5% on such a trade. This approach involves re-accumulation, where the sellside drops down to 50%, and then I match it with another array to capture the reversal. Now, picture a market maker model involving a consolidation phase where relative equal lows are formed, followed by an upward rally, possibly forming a consolidation that resembles a bull flag pattern. Subsequently, it rallies out of that consolidation. Sometimes, it may create a second stage of re-accumulation as it trades towards a premium array level—a level I consider a liquidity draw. If I'm feeling bullish, I'd aim for that level. I don't necessarily need to be there at the exact moment; I might spot the opportunity later and act accordingly. If it's reacting off of a level, that should offer sellside. So, you know where sellside delivery. The market should drop down. So, I'm anticipating price reacting and reversing at the smart money reversal once it starts to break down. If it goes back up a little bit, that's the smart money reversal. Low risk sell is the next stage and then they'll drop. When we reach the low-risk sell, it's important that the drop reaches at least 50% of the total range from the smart money reversal to the sellside I'm targeting. As long as it accomplishes this, I have confidence that the subsequent rally will reach a premium array on the left side of the curve before the market makes its high and reverses. Why would it do that? Because it's part of a larger continuation. So when and how would I determine when it's going to fail ,that first leg of re-distribution on the sell side, if it doesn't pierce 50% of that range from the smart money reversal down to the sell side liquidity. If it doesn't do that, then it's not going to go down there. It's going to be a continuation of reverse and go the other way." #ict #ICT

LumiTraders

387,627 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

He's right, I do have it in my notes because he did say it! 😆 On multiple instances, but here's him saying it on Trader Round Up: Timestamp 1:00:00 “They have to have the last two Mondays and the last two Fridays always, because they are the beginning and the end of the week.” ---- Timestamp 59:53 "In fact, every Monday, you should have two Mondays and two Fridays. In my opinion, if you’re going to ask me, like I teach my sons, they have to have the last two Mondays and the last two Fridays always because they’re at the beginning and the end of the week. So that’s what Cameron made money with today. He used information that is gleaned from that range, where we’re at in price action, and using the higher timeframe expectancy that we saw, that rejection when it went up to take that short term high." ---- Timestamp 1:00:46 "But every one of you listening, if you were my kid, if you were sitting with me, you would be hearing me tell you: Do you have two Mondays worth? Do you have both Fridays? Present today’s Friday and then last Friday’s Opening Range high, low and close, and the gradient levels on it? And then where are we in relation to that? Are we significantly above it, significantly below it, are we in close proximity to it? Because Monday’s Opening Range gap and Friday’s Opening Range gap are like a big huge draw on liquidity. It'll act like a big magnet. Not all the time, it’s not a panacea, but if we’ve traveled a lot one way, those Opening Ranges tend to be a factor on the close of the week and the beginning of the week. So Monday’s trading and Friday’s trading, using that framework that includes two weeks worth of Monday and Friday, have them in there. Even if you don’t want to carry Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, the week prior to last week at least have that previous Monday in there, because that way you’ll gonna have a full range of opportunity that the algorithm will refer back to."
0:35

He's right, I do have it in my notes because he did say it! 😆 On multiple instances, but here's him saying it on Trader Round Up: Timestamp 1:00:00 “They have to have the last two Mondays and the last two Fridays always, because they are the beginning and the end of the week.” ---- Timestamp 59:53 "In fact, every Monday, you should have two Mondays and two Fridays. In my opinion, if you’re going to ask me, like I teach my sons, they have to have the last two Mondays and the last two Fridays always because they’re at the beginning and the end of the week. So that’s what Cameron made money with today. He used information that is gleaned from that range, where we’re at in price action, and using the higher timeframe expectancy that we saw, that rejection when it went up to take that short term high." ---- Timestamp 1:00:46 "But every one of you listening, if you were my kid, if you were sitting with me, you would be hearing me tell you: Do you have two Mondays worth? Do you have both Fridays? Present today’s Friday and then last Friday’s Opening Range high, low and close, and the gradient levels on it? And then where are we in relation to that? Are we significantly above it, significantly below it, are we in close proximity to it? Because Monday’s Opening Range gap and Friday’s Opening Range gap are like a big huge draw on liquidity. It'll act like a big magnet. Not all the time, it’s not a panacea, but if we’ve traveled a lot one way, those Opening Ranges tend to be a factor on the close of the week and the beginning of the week. So Monday’s trading and Friday’s trading, using that framework that includes two weeks worth of Monday and Friday, have them in there. Even if you don’t want to carry Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, the week prior to last week at least have that previous Monday in there, because that way you’ll gonna have a full range of opportunity that the algorithm will refer back to."

Pipmunch

185,186 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

Beloved, in this month of July, we declare upon you; 1. Receive the blessing of life – You will not be cut short before your time! 2. Receive the blessing of health – you shall not live in pain and in distress 3. Receive the blessing of Divine preservation - you shall not be a victim of witchcraft attacks 4. Receive the blessing of Divine direction – you shall not be a victim of confusion 5. Receive the blessing of supernatural supplies - scarcity and shortage shall not be your portion 6. Receive the blessing of Destiny opening – your destiny shall not be closed! 7. Above all, receive the blessing of intimacy with God – May the Lord draw you closer and closer, in Jesus’ Name.
3:08

Beloved, in this month of July, we declare upon you; 1. Receive the blessing of life – You will not be cut short before your time! 2. Receive the blessing of health – you shall not live in pain and in distress 3. Receive the blessing of Divine preservation - you shall not be a victim of witchcraft attacks 4. Receive the blessing of Divine direction – you shall not be a victim of confusion 5. Receive the blessing of supernatural supplies - scarcity and shortage shall not be your portion 6. Receive the blessing of Destiny opening – your destiny shall not be closed! 7. Above all, receive the blessing of intimacy with God – May the Lord draw you closer and closer, in Jesus’ Name.

Dr Paul Enenche

13,442 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Let me walk you through an actual futures trade using our 3-step trading system. This system is what I use for EVERY futures trade—the 3 steps are: Step 1: Break of Structure Step 2: Mark the Zone Step 3: Wait for Entry Let’s dive in… Step 1: Break of Structure On the 5-minute chart, price takes out the previous swing high. Trend = bullish. We're only looking for longs. Step 2: Mark the Zone I draw a demand zone at the lowest consolidation that LED to that break of structure. Now I validate it: • Broke structure ✓ • Created imbalance (gap on 1-minute chart) ✓ • Swept liquidity (double bottom trap for retail) ✓ Step 3: Wait for Entry Price drops back into my zone. Here's the critical part: Retail traders enter immediately. They get excited. They place stops below the low. I do nothing. I wait for price to sweep those stops—the liquidity grab. THEN I enter on the second move up. Here’s my results from a live trade: • Entry: After liquidity sweep • Stop loss: Below sweep candle (10 points) • Take profit: 1:2 ratio (20 points) • Position size: 2 contracts (1% risk on $10K account) Price hesitates. Drops slightly. Then rips to TP. — This is just scratching the surface. In the full 2-hour futures trading masterclass, I break down: • How to calculate exact position sizes • The 3 beginner futures mistakes that cost traders thousands • Live chart examples walking through actual entries and exits step-by-step Just comment "FUTURES" and I'll send you the complete masterclass in the next few minutes.
8:26

Let me walk you through an actual futures trade using our 3-step trading system. This system is what I use for EVERY futures trade—the 3 steps are: Step 1: Break of Structure Step 2: Mark the Zone Step 3: Wait for Entry Let’s dive in… Step 1: Break of Structure On the 5-minute chart, price takes out the previous swing high. Trend = bullish. We're only looking for longs. Step 2: Mark the Zone I draw a demand zone at the lowest consolidation that LED to that break of structure. Now I validate it: • Broke structure ✓ • Created imbalance (gap on 1-minute chart) ✓ • Swept liquidity (double bottom trap for retail) ✓ Step 3: Wait for Entry Price drops back into my zone. Here's the critical part: Retail traders enter immediately. They get excited. They place stops below the low. I do nothing. I wait for price to sweep those stops—the liquidity grab. THEN I enter on the second move up. Here’s my results from a live trade: • Entry: After liquidity sweep • Stop loss: Below sweep candle (10 points) • Take profit: 1:2 ratio (20 points) • Position size: 2 contracts (1% risk on $10K account) Price hesitates. Drops slightly. Then rips to TP. — This is just scratching the surface. In the full 2-hour futures trading masterclass, I break down: • How to calculate exact position sizes • The 3 beginner futures mistakes that cost traders thousands • Live chart examples walking through actual entries and exits step-by-step Just comment "FUTURES" and I'll send you the complete masterclass in the next few minutes.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

29,978 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Walmart's genius private label strategy literally KILLED name brands... By doing the exact OPPOSITE of what everyone said you should do. In April 2024, they launched Bettergoods - a "cheap" store brand. But instead of targeting broke customers, they went after RICH ones. 28% of U.S. households bought it in one year. $500 million in sales. 40% came back for more. It's now the fastest-growing private label brand in America. This is the most insane private label play in retail history... The Old Playbook (that everyone follows): - Private labels = cheaper version of name brands - Target price-conscious shoppers - Make it look "good enough" - Compete on cost alone Great Value, Kirkland, Equate - they all did this. And it worked. For the bottom 80% of customers. But Walmart saw something nobody else did. The Problem With Traditional Private Labels: High-income shoppers won't touch them. They associate store brands with "lower quality." Even when the product is IDENTICAL, the perception kills sales. So Walmart asked a different question: "What if we made a private label that high-income people actually WANT?" The Bettergoods Strategy: - Most items under $5 (same as Great Value) - But packaging looks like a $15 boutique product - "Chef-inspired" flavors - Trend-forward ingredients (oat milk ice cream, hot honey seasoning, plant-based everything) - Totally unique products - NOT knock-offs of name brands And here's the genius part: They're selling to TWO completely different customers with the SAME product. Low-income shoppers: "I'm treating myself without breaking the bank" High-income shoppers: "This is premium quality at an amazing price" The numbers prove it worked: High-income households are 20% MORE likely to buy Bettergoods than Great Value. Low-income households are 34% more likely to buy Bettergoods than other premium brands. They captured BOTH ends of the market. With the same $3.44 pint of ice cream. Why This Killed Name Brands: Before Bettergoods, high-income Walmart shoppers bought Ben & Jerry's, Häagen-Dazs, Talenti. Now they buy Bettergoods. Same quality. Half the price. Trendier flavors. The name brands lost their premium positioning overnight. Because Walmart proved you can have: - Affordable prices - Premium ingredients - Unique flavors - Beautiful packaging All at once. The Execution: - 300+ products in Year 1 - Bronze-cut pasta from Italy for $1.97 - Creamy Corn Jalapeño Chowder for under $4 - Plant-based oat milk ice cream that "you won't believe is plant-based" - Hot Honey Seasoning under $3 78% plan to repurchase. 46% say it's better value than other brands. 37% say it's healthier. 34% say higher-quality ingredients. Walmart didn't just launch a product... They repositioned an entire category. What I Learned From This: Stop assuming "premium" means "expensive." Your competitors think they have to choose: - Cheap OR high-quality - Mass market OR exclusive - Accessible OR aspirational Bettergoods proved you can be ALL of it. The framework: 1. Find the assumption everyone makes about your category 2. Do the opposite 3. Package it so both markets see what they want 4. Make the product legitimately good I've seen many companies go cheap to win on price. Or premium to win on quality. Walmart said fuck that and won on BOTH. By making a $3 product feel like $15. And now this isn't just working for Walmart. Target launched Dealworthy (same strategy, different execution). Second-fastest growing private label over the past year. The era of "cheap = low quality" is dead. Smart brands are premiumizing their low-cost offers. Dumb brands are still trying to be the "affordable alternative." What are you?
1:14

Walmart's genius private label strategy literally KILLED name brands... By doing the exact OPPOSITE of what everyone said you should do. In April 2024, they launched Bettergoods - a "cheap" store brand. But instead of targeting broke customers, they went after RICH ones. 28% of U.S. households bought it in one year. $500 million in sales. 40% came back for more. It's now the fastest-growing private label brand in America. This is the most insane private label play in retail history... The Old Playbook (that everyone follows): - Private labels = cheaper version of name brands - Target price-conscious shoppers - Make it look "good enough" - Compete on cost alone Great Value, Kirkland, Equate - they all did this. And it worked. For the bottom 80% of customers. But Walmart saw something nobody else did. The Problem With Traditional Private Labels: High-income shoppers won't touch them. They associate store brands with "lower quality." Even when the product is IDENTICAL, the perception kills sales. So Walmart asked a different question: "What if we made a private label that high-income people actually WANT?" The Bettergoods Strategy: - Most items under $5 (same as Great Value) - But packaging looks like a $15 boutique product - "Chef-inspired" flavors - Trend-forward ingredients (oat milk ice cream, hot honey seasoning, plant-based everything) - Totally unique products - NOT knock-offs of name brands And here's the genius part: They're selling to TWO completely different customers with the SAME product. Low-income shoppers: "I'm treating myself without breaking the bank" High-income shoppers: "This is premium quality at an amazing price" The numbers prove it worked: High-income households are 20% MORE likely to buy Bettergoods than Great Value. Low-income households are 34% more likely to buy Bettergoods than other premium brands. They captured BOTH ends of the market. With the same $3.44 pint of ice cream. Why This Killed Name Brands: Before Bettergoods, high-income Walmart shoppers bought Ben & Jerry's, Häagen-Dazs, Talenti. Now they buy Bettergoods. Same quality. Half the price. Trendier flavors. The name brands lost their premium positioning overnight. Because Walmart proved you can have: - Affordable prices - Premium ingredients - Unique flavors - Beautiful packaging All at once. The Execution: - 300+ products in Year 1 - Bronze-cut pasta from Italy for $1.97 - Creamy Corn Jalapeño Chowder for under $4 - Plant-based oat milk ice cream that "you won't believe is plant-based" - Hot Honey Seasoning under $3 78% plan to repurchase. 46% say it's better value than other brands. 37% say it's healthier. 34% say higher-quality ingredients. Walmart didn't just launch a product... They repositioned an entire category. What I Learned From This: Stop assuming "premium" means "expensive." Your competitors think they have to choose: - Cheap OR high-quality - Mass market OR exclusive - Accessible OR aspirational Bettergoods proved you can be ALL of it. The framework: 1. Find the assumption everyone makes about your category 2. Do the opposite 3. Package it so both markets see what they want 4. Make the product legitimately good I've seen many companies go cheap to win on price. Or premium to win on quality. Walmart said fuck that and won on BOTH. By making a $3 product feel like $15. And now this isn't just working for Walmart. Target launched Dealworthy (same strategy, different execution). Second-fastest growing private label over the past year. The era of "cheap = low quality" is dead. Smart brands are premiumizing their low-cost offers. Dumb brands are still trying to be the "affordable alternative." What are you?

Ricardo

932,767 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

IMPROVE EXECUTION IN THE FIRST 5–15 MINUTES Many traders who rely heavily on opening range trading often struggle with where to focus in the initial minutes of the trading day and how to avoid missing trades during this period. Poor execution in this window can mean missing out on the entire trading day. In this video, we discuss how we address this using procedural memory and live simulations of the first 5 to 15 minutes of the trading day. We also cover how we improve stock selection for the focus list during this period through feedback loops. This is a common challenge in the fintwit community, where everyone is searching for a mechanical formula to shrink a watchlist of 25–30 stocks down to just 3–5, hoping to pick only the stocks that will move the next day. Unfortunately, such magic formulas exist only for three kinds of people: God, an astrologer, or a liar. For the rest of us, there are no A=B type rules that can consistently identify the next day’s best movers. And this desperation is exactly what allows many snake oil salesmen thrive. That said, the focus list can be improved significantly through consistent feedback loops, by comparing your watchlist with what the market actually delivered. Over time, your chart-reading ability improves, and you start recognizing the characteristics that lead to high-probability setups. This is where the craft of trading comes into play, not just the rigid, rule-based approach that many keep searching for.
7:35

IMPROVE EXECUTION IN THE FIRST 5–15 MINUTES Many traders who rely heavily on opening range trading often struggle with where to focus in the initial minutes of the trading day and how to avoid missing trades during this period. Poor execution in this window can mean missing out on the entire trading day. In this video, we discuss how we address this using procedural memory and live simulations of the first 5 to 15 minutes of the trading day. We also cover how we improve stock selection for the focus list during this period through feedback loops. This is a common challenge in the fintwit community, where everyone is searching for a mechanical formula to shrink a watchlist of 25–30 stocks down to just 3–5, hoping to pick only the stocks that will move the next day. Unfortunately, such magic formulas exist only for three kinds of people: God, an astrologer, or a liar. For the rest of us, there are no A=B type rules that can consistently identify the next day’s best movers. And this desperation is exactly what allows many snake oil salesmen thrive. That said, the focus list can be improved significantly through consistent feedback loops, by comparing your watchlist with what the market actually delivered. Over time, your chart-reading ability improves, and you start recognizing the characteristics that lead to high-probability setups. This is where the craft of trading comes into play, not just the rigid, rule-based approach that many keep searching for.

TradeTM

18,990 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

I was very happy to see how enthusiastic people were about the first hand review, so here's another one. I'm using some screenshots from vision to show where I made the right play or made a mistake. This isn't a 1 to 1 solution to this exact spot, because vision has a limited number of positions so the results a merely indicative not final. A like on this post is much appreciated. We wake up with KK84ds in the big blind vs a button open. We push quite a bit of equity here vs his opening range so we elect a 3-bet. The flop comes K42r and here we have our first serious decision. Our entire 3-bet range does okay on this board, so we want to both bet our strong hands and add in quite a few bluffs. For that reason KKxx should bet here at a healthy frequency, but also blocking the 4 makes this one of the few candidates that we want to consider playing slow (screenshot 1). We check and our opponent bets, we want him to continue bluffing with air and protect our calling range, so most of the time we are calling here (screenshot 2). The turn brings a queen with our flush draw and we check, which is our first mistake. The queen is benefitial for our range (we 3-bet a lot of high cards) and the air portion of my range is gone, while he still has some air in his stabbing range. Since we have a sizeable equity advantage now, we should start betting with a lot of value and start adding in some bluffs (screenshot 3). After checking our opponent bets 50% pot and here we have yet another interesting spot. In a vacuum betting here makes a lot of money, but we want to consider all the hands that we are playing in this spot. This hand is so strong that it doesn't need that much protection and we still want our opponent to keep his air in the hand. We also want to protect our calling range here (screenshot 4). The river brings in the flush and yet another tough decision for us. We block a decent part of the board, so I still give my opponent credit for not having anything. Most if the flushes that will call my bet here, will also bet themselves when checked to. That's why I decided to check here. I was very happy with how I played this hand, but still made a crucial mistake on the turn. Even at higher stakes, people are constantly screwing up if you compare their strategy to a solver output. Knowing what the solver would do in every spot is impossible. What is possible though, is understanding the broader concepts. Understanding why the solver bets here on the turn is information that you can extrapolate in any situation that is somewhat similar. That's why is it so valuable. Hopefully you enjoyed this breakdown as much as you did with the last one. A like on this post is much appreciated. Stay tuned!
1:15

I was very happy to see how enthusiastic people were about the first hand review, so here's another one. I'm using some screenshots from vision to show where I made the right play or made a mistake. This isn't a 1 to 1 solution to this exact spot, because vision has a limited number of positions so the results a merely indicative not final. A like on this post is much appreciated. We wake up with KK84ds in the big blind vs a button open. We push quite a bit of equity here vs his opening range so we elect a 3-bet. The flop comes K42r and here we have our first serious decision. Our entire 3-bet range does okay on this board, so we want to both bet our strong hands and add in quite a few bluffs. For that reason KKxx should bet here at a healthy frequency, but also blocking the 4 makes this one of the few candidates that we want to consider playing slow (screenshot 1). We check and our opponent bets, we want him to continue bluffing with air and protect our calling range, so most of the time we are calling here (screenshot 2). The turn brings a queen with our flush draw and we check, which is our first mistake. The queen is benefitial for our range (we 3-bet a lot of high cards) and the air portion of my range is gone, while he still has some air in his stabbing range. Since we have a sizeable equity advantage now, we should start betting with a lot of value and start adding in some bluffs (screenshot 3). After checking our opponent bets 50% pot and here we have yet another interesting spot. In a vacuum betting here makes a lot of money, but we want to consider all the hands that we are playing in this spot. This hand is so strong that it doesn't need that much protection and we still want our opponent to keep his air in the hand. We also want to protect our calling range here (screenshot 4). The river brings in the flush and yet another tough decision for us. We block a decent part of the board, so I still give my opponent credit for not having anything. Most if the flushes that will call my bet here, will also bet themselves when checked to. That's why I decided to check here. I was very happy with how I played this hand, but still made a crucial mistake on the turn. Even at higher stakes, people are constantly screwing up if you compare their strategy to a solver output. Knowing what the solver would do in every spot is impossible. What is possible though, is understanding the broader concepts. Understanding why the solver bets here on the turn is information that you can extrapolate in any situation that is somewhat similar. That's why is it so valuable. Hopefully you enjoyed this breakdown as much as you did with the last one. A like on this post is much appreciated. Stay tuned!

Venividi1993

93,143 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

This is for everyone asking how I get my levels. Million dollars worth of game... 1. Choose any time frame. 2. Draw levels at the high and low of the most recent candle after it’s closed. 3. Go to the projection tool and select long position. Click the top of the candle and drag to set your stop at the low of the candle and then set your risk to reward above to 1.5. 4. Go to the projection tool again and select short position… Click the bottom of the candle and drag your stop to the high of the candle and then set the risk to reward below to 1.5. 5. More often than not, if price is at the top of the candle, you really want to see a wick of the next candle take out the above liquidity to favor puts back down to the low of the candle and possibly to the set target… Vice versa if price is at the bottom of the candle, you want calls… Don’t diddle in the middle. Make sure the magnet tool is on if you want the levels to snap to the candle for more precision. Monthly candle - Daily candle for entry. Weekly candle - 4 hour candle for entry. Daily candle - Hourly or 15 min candle for entry. 4 hour candle - 15 min or 5 min candle for entry. Hourly candle - 3 to 5 min candle for entry. 10 min candle - 1 to 2 min candle for entry. Video example below. See profit, take profit. 💰
1:14

This is for everyone asking how I get my levels. Million dollars worth of game... 1. Choose any time frame. 2. Draw levels at the high and low of the most recent candle after it’s closed. 3. Go to the projection tool and select long position. Click the top of the candle and drag to set your stop at the low of the candle and then set your risk to reward above to 1.5. 4. Go to the projection tool again and select short position… Click the bottom of the candle and drag your stop to the high of the candle and then set the risk to reward below to 1.5. 5. More often than not, if price is at the top of the candle, you really want to see a wick of the next candle take out the above liquidity to favor puts back down to the low of the candle and possibly to the set target… Vice versa if price is at the bottom of the candle, you want calls… Don’t diddle in the middle. Make sure the magnet tool is on if you want the levels to snap to the candle for more precision. Monthly candle - Daily candle for entry. Weekly candle - 4 hour candle for entry. Daily candle - Hourly or 15 min candle for entry. 4 hour candle - 15 min or 5 min candle for entry. Hourly candle - 3 to 5 min candle for entry. 10 min candle - 1 to 2 min candle for entry. Video example below. See profit, take profit. 💰

Paperhands McGee

57,781 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce