Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨NUCLEAR EXTINCTION: PUTIN HAS THREATENED ANNIHILATION IF A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS DETECTED Putin's recent statements on nuclear capabilities should be alarming to EVERYONE. He threatened ‘enemies’ with total nuclear annihilation, leaving 'no chance of survival' Putin emphasized that once Nuclear missile launches are detected, a massive retaliatory strike of... HUNDREDS of Russian Nuclear missiles will be unleashed from various directions, ensuring that ‘no single enemy survives.’ In other words, any Nuclear strike from any NATO member could mean a simultaneous and total nuclear strike against all NATO nuclear powers, including the U.S. It's important to note that NATO has never threatened a first strike on Moscow. Recent reports suggested suspicions of a new test in the Arctic involving the Burevestnik, a super powerful missile with an onboard nuclear reactor. Putin also bragged about the successful testing of the 'Sarmat' or 'Satan-2,' an unstoppable ICBM that travels at 15,880 mph and is the size of a 14-storey tower block. He vowed to move towards mass production and combat duty deployment soon. When asked about resuming nuclear weapons testing, Putin remained non-committal, suggesting Russia could potentially revoke ratification of the international nuclear test ban treaty. MY THOUGHTS: The Ukraine war is complex. Russia is at fault, and denying this is ridiculous. This does NOT mean NATO is also not at fault, and it does not mean one cannot criticize the West for not doing enough to END the war. Voters, the media, and lawmakers, need to take steps in DE-ESCALATING this war rather than criticizing those who do so. I don’t want to sound alarming, but if this war gets out of control, the world is at risk of more destruction than both World Wars combined. Although slim, this is the closest we've been to such a position since the Cold War. Russia is known to bluff, and people like to compare this to the ‘Boy That Cried Wolf’. What those people forget is that eventually, the boy cried wolf and the wolf was actually there, killing the boy. This is a risk the world CANNOT AFFORD.show more

Mario Nawfal

3,712,310 subscribers

6,904,513 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Ian Miles Cheong2 years ago

If NATO launched nukes at Russia are they expecting Russia to just take it? Obviously this is going to be the response.

Mario Nawfal2 years ago

Agree My concern is 3-fold: 1. Why this rhetoric 2. Why threaten ALL NATO members if one attacks 3. Why the recent tests

❎box 𝔾 🎮 🇬🇧2 years ago

Why is no one trying to de-escalate this!? 👀

Mario Nawfal2 years ago

Yep…

tylda052 years ago

But is he crying wolf, he’s saying if someone fires a nuclear weapon at Russia they will retaliate! What else would you expect?

Mario Nawfal2 years ago

Retaliate towards ALL nuclear members in nato Also, why this rhetoric now? Why the tests? Could be a bluff, but why are we taking chances

olexander scherba🇺🇦2 years ago

Absolutely! Let’s feed to putin some more Ukrainian land, people, freedom, so that he doesn’t blow up the Earth! Maybe throw in some of whatsaname… Lathuanians. But in order it doesn’t stink like chickenshit - let’s call it nicely DE-ESCALATION!

Mario Nawfal2 years ago

How do you recommend we de-escalate? Or SHOULD we try to de-escalate in your opinion?

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉2 years ago

Russia is not at fault.

FoJAk2 years ago

Pretty good post except for the "Russia is at fault "part. Just a ridiculous thing to say. It makes you sound uneducated. This war was caused directly by NATO and its allies.

Related Videos

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?

Mario Nawfal

10,995,381 views • 2 years ago

Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned the west (US and NATO) “This is not a bluff” on the topic of using Nuclear weapons to defend Russia and its people

Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned the west (US and NATO) “This is not a bluff” on the topic of using Nuclear weapons to defend Russia and its people

S p r i n t e r

43,117 views • 9 months ago

Senator Chris Murhpy on Iran's nuclear program: The president has also said over and over again that a goal of the war is to permanently deny Iran the ability to have nuclear weapons. But in our closed-door briefings, we learned that this is not actually a goal of the war plan. It is not a goal of the war to destroy Iran’s nuclear program — which is not surprising, because you cannot destroy Iran’s nuclear program from the air. You cannot destroy knowledge. You cannot hunt down with missiles every Iranian scientist who knows how to build a nuclear reactor. And much of the material is buried so far underground that it is immune to an air campaign. But then why is the president and the Department of Defense telling the American people that the point of the war is to destroy Iran’s nuclear program?

Senator Chris Murhpy on Iran's nuclear program: The president has also said over and over again that a goal of the war is to permanently deny Iran the ability to have nuclear weapons. But in our closed-door briefings, we learned that this is not actually a goal of the war plan. It is not a goal of the war to destroy Iran’s nuclear program — which is not surprising, because you cannot destroy Iran’s nuclear program from the air. You cannot destroy knowledge. You cannot hunt down with missiles every Iranian scientist who knows how to build a nuclear reactor. And much of the material is buried so far underground that it is immune to an air campaign. But then why is the president and the Department of Defense telling the American people that the point of the war is to destroy Iran’s nuclear program?

Clash Report

31,792 views • 4 months ago

Head of the Presidential Office Kyrylo Budanov, in an interview with Maxim Tucker for The Times, on the probability of a nuclear strike from Russia: I have not seen any indicators of preparation for a nuclear strike. Russia has the ability to strike with a nuclear weapon at any given place, at any distance, at any given moment. Its nuclear capabilities allow it to accomplish such a task. But the question of doing that is a matter of a political decision. Had there been any preparations I would be aware of them.

Head of the Presidential Office Kyrylo Budanov, in an interview with Maxim Tucker for The Times, on the probability of a nuclear strike from Russia: I have not seen any indicators of preparation for a nuclear strike. Russia has the ability to strike with a nuclear weapon at any given place, at any distance, at any given moment. Its nuclear capabilities allow it to accomplish such a task. But the question of doing that is a matter of a political decision. Had there been any preparations I would be aware of them.

Anton Gerashchenko

19,880 views • 2 months ago

[Q]: Is Putin capable of launching a nuclear strike? Denys Shtilierman: Look, the most important thing in this war is to never think about the fact that Russia has nuclear weapons. If we think about that, we have already lost. We have to fight as if they do not have anything. Moreover, experience shows that China does not need this. And without China, Russia is simply incapable of waging any war. Nobody in the world needs this,” - Denys Shtilierman, co-founder and chief designer of Fire Point.

[Q]: Is Putin capable of launching a nuclear strike? Denys Shtilierman: Look, the most important thing in this war is to never think about the fact that Russia has nuclear weapons. If we think about that, we have already lost. We have to fight as if they do not have anything. Moreover, experience shows that China does not need this. And without China, Russia is simply incapable of waging any war. Nobody in the world needs this,” - Denys Shtilierman, co-founder and chief designer of Fire Point.

Anton Gerashchenko

35,893 views • 1 month ago

🇬🇧🇷🇺🇺🇦‼️🚨 STARMER IS READY TO SACRAFICE UK TO NOT LET RUSSIA WIN Journalist: “Russia’s also threatened Nuclear escalation, are you comfortable with that, with people watching at home, knowing you could be putting us at risk? Nuclear war?” Starmer: “Russia is the aggressor.” Journalist: “Even if it unleashes Nuclear War?” Starmer: “Russia has to be the one that makes the move to stop this war”

🇬🇧🇷🇺🇺🇦‼️🚨 STARMER IS READY TO SACRAFICE UK TO NOT LET RUSSIA WIN Journalist: “Russia’s also threatened Nuclear escalation, are you comfortable with that, with people watching at home, knowing you could be putting us at risk? Nuclear war?” Starmer: “Russia is the aggressor.” Journalist: “Even if it unleashes Nuclear War?” Starmer: “Russia has to be the one that makes the move to stop this war”

Lord Bebo

365,653 views • 1 year ago

🚨INTERVIEW: “CHINA'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS RISING, BUT IT’S NOT THERE YET” “China, thanks to whose support the Russian economy is still functioning, and Russia is able to conduct this war, is also not ready for international politics going nuclear. China is a world economic superpower, the largest economy in the world. But it is a mid-power when it comes to nuclear arsenal. China is now the most dynamic nuclear power in terms of developing its nuclear and increasing its nuclear arsenal and its nuclear capabilities. But it is not there yet. China's nuclear arsenal is roughly 10% of what Russia and the United States have in terms of the warheads.” Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.

🚨INTERVIEW: “CHINA'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS RISING, BUT IT’S NOT THERE YET” “China, thanks to whose support the Russian economy is still functioning, and Russia is able to conduct this war, is also not ready for international politics going nuclear. China is a world economic superpower, the largest economy in the world. But it is a mid-power when it comes to nuclear arsenal. China is now the most dynamic nuclear power in terms of developing its nuclear and increasing its nuclear arsenal and its nuclear capabilities. But it is not there yet. China's nuclear arsenal is roughly 10% of what Russia and the United States have in terms of the warheads.” Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.

Mario Nawfal

19,076 views • 7 months ago

Putin claims “the West is openly preparing for war with Russia.” This from the man who launched the largest war in Europe since 1945, invaded a neighbouring country, illegally annexed territory, threatened nuclear escalation, and spends every day accusing others of what he is doing himself. There is only one country routinely firing nuclear-capable missiles in Europe and warning of nuclear Armageddon whenever events do not go its way. That country is Russia.

Putin claims “the West is openly preparing for war with Russia.” This from the man who launched the largest war in Europe since 1945, invaded a neighbouring country, illegally annexed territory, threatened nuclear escalation, and spends every day accusing others of what he is doing himself. There is only one country routinely firing nuclear-capable missiles in Europe and warning of nuclear Armageddon whenever events do not go its way. That country is Russia.

Shaun Pinner

57,266 views • 24 days ago

We need to stop this utter nonsense about fighting Russia. First, Russia is not an enemy and won't be attacking Europe, and second, Russia is a nuclear power. Who in their right mind thinks that if Russia was at risk of losing a conventional war that it wouldn't use its nuclear arsenal? It's only Putins' cool head that's stopping Russia from retaliating against NATO aggression and lobbing a couple of low-grade nuclear weapons at Europe right now. NATO assisting Ukraine to violate Russian territory would have been unthinkable during the Cold War. Wise up, people...

We need to stop this utter nonsense about fighting Russia. First, Russia is not an enemy and won't be attacking Europe, and second, Russia is a nuclear power. Who in their right mind thinks that if Russia was at risk of losing a conventional war that it wouldn't use its nuclear arsenal? It's only Putins' cool head that's stopping Russia from retaliating against NATO aggression and lobbing a couple of low-grade nuclear weapons at Europe right now. NATO assisting Ukraine to violate Russian territory would have been unthinkable during the Cold War. Wise up, people...

Kerry Burgess

32,789 views • 2 months ago

"RUSSIA THREATENS THE U.S." Russia has threatened Europe and NATO with total annihilation on several occasions. Russia would never survive a conventional war against the U.S. and that is why the nuclear threat exists. What Russia forgets is that in a nuclear war, there are no winners...... 📌Andrei Gurulev, a deputy in Russia’s State Duma: "If Trump tries to take over Putin, there will be nothing left in the U.S." "There will be no Biden or Trump - America is being inflicted with 95 percent total damage"

"RUSSIA THREATENS THE U.S." Russia has threatened Europe and NATO with total annihilation on several occasions. Russia would never survive a conventional war against the U.S. and that is why the nuclear threat exists. What Russia forgets is that in a nuclear war, there are no winners...... 📌Andrei Gurulev, a deputy in Russia’s State Duma: "If Trump tries to take over Putin, there will be nothing left in the U.S." "There will be no Biden or Trump - America is being inflicted with 95 percent total damage"

WORLD AT WAR

145,951 views • 6 months ago

The US has calculated Russia's reaction to a nuclear strike - the "Dead Hand" system mentioned by Medvedev makes an attack on Russia pointless: "If the US and UK launch a coordinated nuclear strike on Russia, destroying all major cities and killing President Putin along with the entire military leadership, Russia has a backup retaliatory system - the "Dead Hand". This automated system is designed to respond to such a scenario. Sensors across Russia will collect data on radiation, thermal radiation and seismic activity, confirming the launch of a nuclear strike. The system will then wait for instructions from the control center in Moscow. If there is no response, the "Dead Hand" will consider that the leadership has been destroyed. At that point, the system will autonomously launch about 4,000 nuclear missiles at the US and its NATO ally, causing global devastation. The destruction will be massive, which ensures that even if Russia is destroyed, a retaliatory strike will be carried out. Such an automated retaliation system ensures that the consequences of such an attack will be catastrophic regardless of the outcome. Ultimately, the use of nuclear weapons guarantees mutual destruction, which serves as a grim reminder of the fragile balance of power"

The US has calculated Russia's reaction to a nuclear strike - the "Dead Hand" system mentioned by Medvedev makes an attack on Russia pointless: "If the US and UK launch a coordinated nuclear strike on Russia, destroying all major cities and killing President Putin along with the entire military leadership, Russia has a backup retaliatory system - the "Dead Hand". This automated system is designed to respond to such a scenario. Sensors across Russia will collect data on radiation, thermal radiation and seismic activity, confirming the launch of a nuclear strike. The system will then wait for instructions from the control center in Moscow. If there is no response, the "Dead Hand" will consider that the leadership has been destroyed. At that point, the system will autonomously launch about 4,000 nuclear missiles at the US and its NATO ally, causing global devastation. The destruction will be massive, which ensures that even if Russia is destroyed, a retaliatory strike will be carried out. Such an automated retaliation system ensures that the consequences of such an attack will be catastrophic regardless of the outcome. Ultimately, the use of nuclear weapons guarantees mutual destruction, which serves as a grim reminder of the fragile balance of power"

Victor vicktop55 commentary

1,523,534 views • 11 months ago

Putin said that Ukraine intends to use nuclear weapons against Russia. "By the way, the enemy is not shying away from any other means. Reports have already appeared in the media about their attempts, or intentions, to use some kind of nuclear component," he said. PM Starmer already said there is no ground behind these statements (obviously). This could be Russia's plan for raising the stakes of nuclear blackmail Putin also stated that there is information about possible attempts to sabotage the TurkStream and Blue Stream gas pipelines in the Black Sea. Usually, when Russia announces sabotage suspicions, it means that Russia is planning false flag operations of this kind.

Putin said that Ukraine intends to use nuclear weapons against Russia. "By the way, the enemy is not shying away from any other means. Reports have already appeared in the media about their attempts, or intentions, to use some kind of nuclear component," he said. PM Starmer already said there is no ground behind these statements (obviously). This could be Russia's plan for raising the stakes of nuclear blackmail Putin also stated that there is information about possible attempts to sabotage the TurkStream and Blue Stream gas pipelines in the Black Sea. Usually, when Russia announces sabotage suspicions, it means that Russia is planning false flag operations of this kind.

Anton Gerashchenko

160,502 views • 4 months ago

"VLADIMIR PUTIN'S NUCLEAR WARNING TO EUROPE" Putin delivered a warning to those European countries who’ve been supporting Ukraine. He knows that Russia cannot win a conventional war against NATO. For this reason, he threatens Europe and NATO with nuclear weapons. In a nuclear war, there are no winners, only losers. I see it as unlikely that Putin would carry out a major nuclear attack on Europe as it would lead to total destruction for Russia as well. 📌Putin: "Russia’s has “many more tactical nuclear weapons than there are on the European continent, even if the United States brings theirs over" “Europe does not have a developed early warning system“ "In this sense they are more or less defenceless" Putin is exaggerating a bit here and he's not really sticking to the truth. Russia and the United States maintain robust, independent ballistic missile early warning systems capable of detecting intercontinental and intermediate-range launches. Putin is right there...... Europe as a whole does not have a fully independent, sovereign space-based early warning system yet, but it is far from defenseless. NATO, which includes most European countries integrates with U.S. early warning assets, including upgraded early warning radars in Europe and shared data from U.S. systems. France and the UK also have their own national nuclear deterrents and contribute to alliance warning capabilities.

"VLADIMIR PUTIN'S NUCLEAR WARNING TO EUROPE" Putin delivered a warning to those European countries who’ve been supporting Ukraine. He knows that Russia cannot win a conventional war against NATO. For this reason, he threatens Europe and NATO with nuclear weapons. In a nuclear war, there are no winners, only losers. I see it as unlikely that Putin would carry out a major nuclear attack on Europe as it would lead to total destruction for Russia as well. 📌Putin: "Russia’s has “many more tactical nuclear weapons than there are on the European continent, even if the United States brings theirs over" “Europe does not have a developed early warning system“ "In this sense they are more or less defenceless" Putin is exaggerating a bit here and he's not really sticking to the truth. Russia and the United States maintain robust, independent ballistic missile early warning systems capable of detecting intercontinental and intermediate-range launches. Putin is right there...... Europe as a whole does not have a fully independent, sovereign space-based early warning system yet, but it is far from defenseless. NATO, which includes most European countries integrates with U.S. early warning assets, including upgraded early warning radars in Europe and shared data from U.S. systems. France and the UK also have their own national nuclear deterrents and contribute to alliance warning capabilities.

WORLD AT WAR

32,630 views • 6 months ago

☢️☢️☢️ Nuclear war In the event of a nuclear conflict between Russia and NATO, it is estimated that 98-99% of the population in the US, EU, Russia, and China would perish. This thought-provoking video sheds light on the utter futility of engaging in a nuclear conflict that would devastate the entire northern hemisphere. The goal is to instill a deep sense of fear regarding the consequences of a nuclear war and cultivate a strong desire for negotiation. It's evident that any alternative to the death of 99% of the northern hemisphere's population would be preferable.

☢️☢️☢️ Nuclear war In the event of a nuclear conflict between Russia and NATO, it is estimated that 98-99% of the population in the US, EU, Russia, and China would perish. This thought-provoking video sheds light on the utter futility of engaging in a nuclear conflict that would devastate the entire northern hemisphere. The goal is to instill a deep sense of fear regarding the consequences of a nuclear war and cultivate a strong desire for negotiation. It's evident that any alternative to the death of 99% of the northern hemisphere's population would be preferable.

Russian Market

331,244 views • 3 years ago

Russian President Vladimir Putin has issued a stern warning to the West (US and NATO), stating, "This is not a bluff," regarding the potential use of nuclear weapons to protect Russia and its citizens.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has issued a stern warning to the West (US and NATO), stating, "This is not a bluff," regarding the potential use of nuclear weapons to protect Russia and its citizens.

Vladimir Putin News

137,054 views • 9 months ago

Ken Griffin on President Trump striking Iran: “With this war, I believe the president has done a great service to humanity by curtailing and containing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The combination of the strikes on their nuclear facilities last year, this strike or this war this year has set back Iran’s nuclear ambitions by years, if not a decade or more. And a nuclear-free Middle East is really important both to regional security and ultimately to the security of Western countries, Europe or the United States, which could be impacted by a nuclear warhead in the wrong hands. And I think we should be very thankful that the president has really worked hard to contain the nuclear ambitions of the Iranian people.”

Ken Griffin on President Trump striking Iran: “With this war, I believe the president has done a great service to humanity by curtailing and containing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The combination of the strikes on their nuclear facilities last year, this strike or this war this year has set back Iran’s nuclear ambitions by years, if not a decade or more. And a nuclear-free Middle East is really important both to regional security and ultimately to the security of Western countries, Europe or the United States, which could be impacted by a nuclear warhead in the wrong hands. And I think we should be very thankful that the president has really worked hard to contain the nuclear ambitions of the Iranian people.”

Ryan Saavedra

18,751 views • 2 months ago

There have been recent reports and warnings from Russian officials and allies of President Putin indicating that Russia is prepared to use nuclear weapons against the UK and Germany if the conflict in Ukraine continues. A top Putin advisor has reportedly stated that Russia may eliminate these countries with nuclear strikes as part of its strategic threats. These statements reflect heightened tensions and nuclear rhetoric amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.

There have been recent reports and warnings from Russian officials and allies of President Putin indicating that Russia is prepared to use nuclear weapons against the UK and Germany if the conflict in Ukraine continues. A top Putin advisor has reportedly stated that Russia may eliminate these countries with nuclear strikes as part of its strategic threats. These statements reflect heightened tensions and nuclear rhetoric amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.

Masu Zafi 🔥🔥

119,419 views • 3 months ago