Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Nuclear has been BANNED under state law in Queensland since 2007. Uranium mining also remains BANNED. If David Crisafulli doesn’t believe the nuclear fear campaign why isn’t he lifting the bans?

Will Shackel

10,650 subscribers

28,570 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

Will Shackel1 year ago

✍️Sign to lift the bans:

leftrenewalrenewalrenewal1 year ago

@DavidCrisafulli i hope gina pays for your forehead reduction surgery for this

Captain Johnno1 year ago

Is it because he knows that the cost to implement nuclear power is far more expensive than other available options? Will it's interesting how your argument is only around getting the law changed but not around any cost benefits. The LNP have put out there costings which have been discredited but you could use that as a talking point to show possible savings this way people get a chance to debate the costs. Also there is no interest in the market this would be paid for by the tax payer not the free market

Mammoth Nation2 years ago

Biden's salute to the troops; DOJ attempts to silence Bannon leading up to the Election; Bannon: "There's nothing that will shut me up" Use Promo Code SAVEUSA to get 30% off your Mammoth Nation membership TODAY!

Siobhan1 year ago

A lot of qlders think we should stick to coal & ditch net zero madness altogether. Nuclear is generally considered more preferable than wind & solar but none are considered necessary or preferable to coal & gas. Crisafulli has also invested in upgrading existing coal stations & better maintenance of them.

Nadia Wallace1 year ago

@DavidCrisafulli #NuclearMadness #LNPLostDecade #LNPPartyForTheOligarchs

Tyrone Dlisle1 year ago

@DavidCrisafulli At least bring on a plebiscite and let the people of QLD decide.

Hugh Butler1 year ago

@DavidCrisafulli Beggars belief that @ShackelWill continues to promote giving away our sovereignty to Russia. Most LNP blissfully unaware that uranium ore ≠ nuclear fuel No where in any LNP nuk spruiking do they make a $$$ billion adjustment to build a state of the art enrichment program.

Mike1 year ago

@DavidCrisafulli Why David doesn’t get out of the way of Nuclear is incredible. Build more coal if you want, lift the ban and if others want to build it let them. It will be well regulated!

Mark Cojuangco1 year ago

@DavidCrisafulli Do you have a link to the entire interview ? What was his excuse ?

Will Shackel1 year ago

@DavidCrisafulli

Related Videos

Good luck trying to get more of Australia’s uranium Narendra Modi. Last time India requested Australia’s uranium, Albanese opposed then PM Gillard and spoke against exporting. In 2007, he said on a uranium mining motion “the light on the hill is not the glow of radiation from a nuclear waste dump”. And in the recent nuclear fear campaign he posted that scenic Aussie locations were “under threat” from nuclear power plants. Hopefully our Prime Minister wakes up to the fact Australia is one of the only advanced economies not investing in nuclear soon…

Good luck trying to get more of Australia’s uranium Narendra Modi. Last time India requested Australia’s uranium, Albanese opposed then PM Gillard and spoke against exporting. In 2007, he said on a uranium mining motion “the light on the hill is not the glow of radiation from a nuclear waste dump”. And in the recent nuclear fear campaign he posted that scenic Aussie locations were “under threat” from nuclear power plants. Hopefully our Prime Minister wakes up to the fact Australia is one of the only advanced economies not investing in nuclear soon…

Will Shackel

17,447 views • 1 month ago

Wonder if this is why Tim Houston banned hiking in the woods in Nova Scotia? Uranium mining is now allowed.

Wonder if this is why Tim Houston banned hiking in the woods in Nova Scotia? Uranium mining is now allowed.

The Real Mr Bench

76,774 views • 11 months ago

NSW’s Upper House last night voted 21-19 to lift their uranium & nuclear power ban. It’s the first time in recent memory a pro nuclear bill has passed a house of Parliament in Australia. This is a historic first step for lifting the state ban and other bans across the country.

NSW’s Upper House last night voted 21-19 to lift their uranium & nuclear power ban. It’s the first time in recent memory a pro nuclear bill has passed a house of Parliament in Australia. This is a historic first step for lifting the state ban and other bans across the country.

Will Shackel

87,213 views • 3 months ago

The “best estimate” for nuclear in Australia is not $600bn friendlyjordies. That estimate for Dutton’s nuclear policy assumed a nuclear capital cost more than 5x even the CSIRO. If you honestly believe nuclear doesn’t stack up here, why is it illegal?

The “best estimate” for nuclear in Australia is not $600bn friendlyjordies. That estimate for Dutton’s nuclear policy assumed a nuclear capital cost more than 5x even the CSIRO. If you honestly believe nuclear doesn’t stack up here, why is it illegal?

Will Shackel

35,203 views • 1 month ago

The government has run out of excuses for keeping nuclear power illegal. During this interview with Anthony Albanese the hosts press him on why nuclear power is banned… Albo: “no one is saying that - hey, we want to invest in this [nuclear]. No one.” Host: “There's a rule that says you can't.” Albo: “No, that's because it doesn’t stack up.” Host: “Why do you need a rule if the business case doesn’t stack up, to ban it?” Albo: “Because it doesn’t stack up” Host: “Well, get rid of the moratorium, then” The lack of clear answers goes to show that the government’s only justification for defending the bans on nuclear power is politics. It is wrong to conflate the economics of nuclear with a principled position to just consider nuclear power. At this time, we need all options on the table, including nuclear power. Sign our petition:

The government has run out of excuses for keeping nuclear power illegal. During this interview with Anthony Albanese the hosts press him on why nuclear power is banned… Albo: “no one is saying that - hey, we want to invest in this [nuclear]. No one.” Host: “There's a rule that says you can't.” Albo: “No, that's because it doesn’t stack up.” Host: “Why do you need a rule if the business case doesn’t stack up, to ban it?” Albo: “Because it doesn’t stack up” Host: “Well, get rid of the moratorium, then” The lack of clear answers goes to show that the government’s only justification for defending the bans on nuclear power is politics. It is wrong to conflate the economics of nuclear with a principled position to just consider nuclear power. At this time, we need all options on the table, including nuclear power. Sign our petition:

Will Shackel

70,344 views • 2 years ago

They tried to steal South Africa’s highly enriched uranium at the Pelindaba nuclear facility in 2007. No one has ever been arrested. It is anyone’s guess who “they” could be. All that we know is that the US has on two known occasions under Obama demanded this highly enriched uranium. We said, “NO!”

They tried to steal South Africa’s highly enriched uranium at the Pelindaba nuclear facility in 2007. No one has ever been arrested. It is anyone’s guess who “they” could be. All that we know is that the US has on two known occasions under Obama demanded this highly enriched uranium. We said, “NO!”

Sentletse 🇿🇦🇷🇺🇵🇸🇱🇧

48,324 views • 3 months ago

18yo Bonnie Carter has been released from the Brisbane police watch house without charge after being arrested earlier today under Queensland Premier David Crisafulli's speech criminalisation laws for wearing a singlet with a banned phrase. #qldpol

18yo Bonnie Carter has been released from the Brisbane police watch house without charge after being arrested earlier today under Queensland Premier David Crisafulli's speech criminalisation laws for wearing a singlet with a banned phrase. #qldpol

David Marler

248,975 views • 4 months ago

Iran has NO nuclear weapons. Israel has hundreds. U.S. intelligence agencies, the IAEA, and even Israeli defense analysts have all admitted there’s no evidence of an active nuclear weapons program. So why the endless fear campaign? It’s to justify endless sanctions, military build-up, and regional dominance while distracting you from the real nuclear-armed apartheid state right next door.

Iran has NO nuclear weapons. Israel has hundreds. U.S. intelligence agencies, the IAEA, and even Israeli defense analysts have all admitted there’s no evidence of an active nuclear weapons program. So why the endless fear campaign? It’s to justify endless sanctions, military build-up, and regional dominance while distracting you from the real nuclear-armed apartheid state right next door.

YourFavoriteGuy

15,625 views • 5 months ago

Marco Rubio is a phenomenal Secretary of State. "Why would you bury things in a mountain 300ft under the ground? Why do they have 60% enriched uranium. The only countries that have uranium at 60%, are countries that have nuclear weapons." "Why do they have a space program?"

Marco Rubio is a phenomenal Secretary of State. "Why would you bury things in a mountain 300ft under the ground? Why do they have 60% enriched uranium. The only countries that have uranium at 60%, are countries that have nuclear weapons." "Why do they have a space program?"

Thomas Hern

943,663 views • 1 year ago

Lukashenko on nuclear weapons: If we approach the matter from the standpoint of fairness, does the United States of America possess nuclear weapons? Yes, it does. Okay, the United States is the pioneer of nuclear weapons and has held them for a long time. But Israel remains quiet about the fact that it has nuclear weapons. The Iranians could ask, “Why can’t we have nuclear weapons?” Especially when nearby India and Pakistan are nuclear powers. Why can’t Iran have nuclear weapons? If we want fairness, let us gradually, step by step, eliminate all nuclear weapons in the world. But if nuclear weapons are a deterrent, a guarantee that no one will ever attack you, then Iran has the right, like other nations, to possess nuclear weapons for its own defense.

Lukashenko on nuclear weapons: If we approach the matter from the standpoint of fairness, does the United States of America possess nuclear weapons? Yes, it does. Okay, the United States is the pioneer of nuclear weapons and has held them for a long time. But Israel remains quiet about the fact that it has nuclear weapons. The Iranians could ask, “Why can’t we have nuclear weapons?” Especially when nearby India and Pakistan are nuclear powers. Why can’t Iran have nuclear weapons? If we want fairness, let us gradually, step by step, eliminate all nuclear weapons in the world. But if nuclear weapons are a deterrent, a guarantee that no one will ever attack you, then Iran has the right, like other nations, to possess nuclear weapons for its own defense.

Clash Report

46,958 views • 1 month ago

If the Nazi Symbol is banned then why isn’t the Communist Symbol banned? Why is a Party simply advocating for White people banned but the Communist Party is not? We all know why! Why do we allow these double standards? Also it wasn’t 6 million. No one believes that. All of the historical evidence has debunked this highly inflated number. It makes it pretty obvious who currently has control of the West, you just have to look at the policies in place.

If the Nazi Symbol is banned then why isn’t the Communist Symbol banned? Why is a Party simply advocating for White people banned but the Communist Party is not? We all know why! Why do we allow these double standards? Also it wasn’t 6 million. No one believes that. All of the historical evidence has debunked this highly inflated number. It makes it pretty obvious who currently has control of the West, you just have to look at the policies in place.

Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏

11,683 views • 1 month ago

“UNRWA has been banned by the State of Israel. We haven’t been allowed to bring in any supplies since 2 March (for more than 4 months now).” Our UNRWA Juliette Touma tells Sky News. A #Ceasefire and lifting the siege are urgently needed to prevent further catastrophe in #Gaza.

“UNRWA has been banned by the State of Israel. We haven’t been allowed to bring in any supplies since 2 March (for more than 4 months now).” Our UNRWA Juliette Touma tells Sky News. A #Ceasefire and lifting the siege are urgently needed to prevent further catastrophe in #Gaza.

UNRWA

30,567 views • 1 year ago

🚨 TV ADVERT DEPICTING THE STATE OF BRITAIN HAS BEEN BANNED!!! Coinbase CEO tweeted “Our ad which got banned in the UK by the TV networks has sparked quite a reaction. If you can't say it, then there must be a kernel of truth in it,”

🚨 TV ADVERT DEPICTING THE STATE OF BRITAIN HAS BEEN BANNED!!! Coinbase CEO tweeted “Our ad which got banned in the UK by the TV networks has sparked quite a reaction. If you can't say it, then there must be a kernel of truth in it,”

James Freeman

1,064,585 views • 1 year ago

Putin has issued fresh nuclear threats, claiming that the new intermediate-range ballistic missile “Oreshnik” can be armed with nuclear warheads. He also bragged about the heavy ICBM “Sarmat,” whose test launches have been completed in Russia, and said that development is in the final stages on the nuclear-powered underwater drone “Poseidon” and the nuclear-powered global-range cruise missile “Burevestnik.”

Putin has issued fresh nuclear threats, claiming that the new intermediate-range ballistic missile “Oreshnik” can be armed with nuclear warheads. He also bragged about the heavy ICBM “Sarmat,” whose test launches have been completed in Russia, and said that development is in the final stages on the nuclear-powered underwater drone “Poseidon” and the nuclear-powered global-range cruise missile “Burevestnik.”

Visegrád 24

88,683 views • 2 months ago

EXCEPTIONS ARE MADE FOR THE EXCEPTIONAL. 2008 REDUX IN 2026? THE INDIA-AUSTRALIA NUCLEAR DEAL IS A COUP PULLED OFF BY MODI. HERE'S WHY. The Australia-India uranium agreement is significant because it reinforces the nuclear exception first created in 2008. India remains outside the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Australia once barred uranium sales to non-NPT states. Today, it is supplying India, underscoring the international confidence India has earned through its non-proliferation record. BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY, India is a rising super power that nation states now want to placate keeping in mind the changing balance of power. This is why Australia is willing to accommodate India within the global nuclear order without asking it to compromise its strategic nuclear programme.

EXCEPTIONS ARE MADE FOR THE EXCEPTIONAL. 2008 REDUX IN 2026? THE INDIA-AUSTRALIA NUCLEAR DEAL IS A COUP PULLED OFF BY MODI. HERE'S WHY. The Australia-India uranium agreement is significant because it reinforces the nuclear exception first created in 2008. India remains outside the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Australia once barred uranium sales to non-NPT states. Today, it is supplying India, underscoring the international confidence India has earned through its non-proliferation record. BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY, India is a rising super power that nation states now want to placate keeping in mind the changing balance of power. This is why Australia is willing to accommodate India within the global nuclear order without asking it to compromise its strategic nuclear programme.

Rahul Shivshankar

31,589 views • 29 days ago

The man in charge of knowing who has nukes says he’s not allowed to say if Israel has nukes. The Undersecretary of State for Arms Control & Nonproliferation of WMDs says he can’t answer if Israel has nuclear weapons because “Israel’s nuclear capabilities is outside his purview”.

The man in charge of knowing who has nukes says he’s not allowed to say if Israel has nukes. The Undersecretary of State for Arms Control & Nonproliferation of WMDs says he can’t answer if Israel has nuclear weapons because “Israel’s nuclear capabilities is outside his purview”.

GenXGirl

16,732 views • 4 months ago

Lawrence Norman, a journalist for the Wall Street Journal, addressing Trump: If Iran's nuclear program has been destroyed [as he has repeatedly claimed], then why is a deal needed?

Lawrence Norman, a journalist for the Wall Street Journal, addressing Trump: If Iran's nuclear program has been destroyed [as he has repeatedly claimed], then why is a deal needed?

Sprinter Press

12,407 views • 6 months ago

🚨 IRAN’S URANIUM STOCKPILE MAY NOW BE HIDDEN INSIDE “PICKAXE MOUNTAIN” U.S. intelligence sources believe Iran has moved its remaining enriched uranium stockpile to a heavily fortified underground complex known as “Pickaxe Mountain.” The site is believed to be deeply buried inside a mountain near Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, with tunnels reinforced to withstand even the most powerful conventional bunker-buster weapons. If the reports are accurate, it would mean Tehran has placed its most sensitive nuclear material inside one of the hardest targets on Earth to destroy. Satellite imagery over recent years has shown massive tunnel entrances, expanding underground chambers, and heavy security, suggesting the site was designed specifically to protect critical nuclear assets. For military planners, the implications are serious. Facilities like this are built for one purpose: to survive a strike and preserve a nuclear program even if everything above ground is destroyed. If Iran’s uranium has indeed been moved there, the strategic equation around its nuclear capability may have just changed dramatically.

🚨 IRAN’S URANIUM STOCKPILE MAY NOW BE HIDDEN INSIDE “PICKAXE MOUNTAIN” U.S. intelligence sources believe Iran has moved its remaining enriched uranium stockpile to a heavily fortified underground complex known as “Pickaxe Mountain.” The site is believed to be deeply buried inside a mountain near Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, with tunnels reinforced to withstand even the most powerful conventional bunker-buster weapons. If the reports are accurate, it would mean Tehran has placed its most sensitive nuclear material inside one of the hardest targets on Earth to destroy. Satellite imagery over recent years has shown massive tunnel entrances, expanding underground chambers, and heavy security, suggesting the site was designed specifically to protect critical nuclear assets. For military planners, the implications are serious. Facilities like this are built for one purpose: to survive a strike and preserve a nuclear program even if everything above ground is destroyed. If Iran’s uranium has indeed been moved there, the strategic equation around its nuclear capability may have just changed dramatically.

Jim Ferguson

67,447 views • 4 months ago