Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Nuclear powered attack submarines are deployed in stealth … countries are not obliged to disclose patrols, or locations, especially in war or near-war conditions. Even the US. That’s the nature of this beast. This classification stems from their core role in intelligence-gathering, anti-submarine warfare, strike, and other sensitive missions...

29,716 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

☝️The use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons to strike Russian territory would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. “We are not talking about authorizing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory—this is already being done with the help of unmanned aircraft and other means. However, when we are talking about the use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons, that is a completely different story. The fact is, and any expert from our country or the West will confirm this, the Ukrainian army is not able to operate such weapons on its own. Their effective use is only possible with targeting intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data that can only come from US or EU satellites—in other words, from NATO satellites. That is the first point. The second, and perhaps the key point, is that only NATO military personnel can program the flight missions for these missile systems; Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore, this is not about allowing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries are becoming directly involved in a military conflict or not. If such a decision is made, it would mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the US, and the EU in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then, bearing this in mind, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats that would be posed to us” - President Putin

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

291,721 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi: Indian Army officer, Major Swathi Shantha Kumar, has won the UN Secretary General’s Award 2025 for her project 'Equal Partners, Lasting Peace'. She says, "I have been deployed in the UN Mission in South Sudan as the Engagement Platoon Commander of a team of 20 women soldiers who have been deployed since August 2024. We have just returned from the Mission area. This was the first time a woman peacekeeper or a team of women soldiers had been deployed in the UN Mission in South Sudan...We always conducted a gender-inclusive patrol, we ensured that women peacekeepers were always participating in operations and all activities. That is how we were able to move ahead in the Mission. This project is an indication of the actions which we have done because when we went into the Mission area, we realised that women soldiers are also required to be conducting patrols along with the male soldiers because it is very necessary...When we engaged with the community, initially they (women and children) had a little hesitation to speak to us. But once we started speaking to them continuously, we were able to get a good response from them; they were able to share their issues. This is what helped us in identifying that women's and men participation are equally important in peacekeeping operations. That is how we were able to conceptualise this project...We started conducting certain awareness camps against conflict-related sexual violence, we started sharing protection contact cards where we were able to share our contacts or emergency contacts and also identify certain areas or regions where we should be conducting more patrols. Because of the presence of UN in these regions, they were able to feel more confident and free in their movement..."

ANI

114,861 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

There is a lot of confusion right now about the sinking of the Iranian warship IRIS Dena and the role of the United States submarine in this incident. So let’s understand what most likely happened. First, the attack took place in international waters near Sri Lanka in the Indian Ocean. Second, the submarine involved was most likely a US nuclear powered attack submarine already operating somewhere in the Indian Ocean region. Many analysts believe it could have been operating from the broader operational area around Diego Garcia, a strategic military base used by the United States and the United Kingdom in the Indian Ocean. Unlike conventional submarines, nuclear submarines can stay underwater for months, because they do not need to surface for fuel. The only real limitation is food and crew endurance. So the submarine could easily remain in the region, quietly tracking naval movements. Now here is the timing part. The Iranian warship IRIS Dena had recently visited Visakhapatnam in India to participate in a multinational naval event hosted by the Indian Navy. After the exercise ended, the ship left Indian waters and began sailing west toward the Arabian Sea. If the submarine was tracking it, the most logical moment to strike would be after the ship left the exercise area and entered open international waters. That is when the torpedo strike reportedly happened near Sri Lanka. Now the next question people are asking is whether this was legal. Under the law of naval warfare, if two countries are in an armed conflict, a military vessel of the opposing side becomes a legitimate military target. Warships can be attacked even in international waters. In this case, the target was not a civilian vessel. It was a military warship of the Iranian navy. So from a naval warfare perspective, this kind of strike is generally considered permissible during active hostilities.

Praffulgarg

25,201 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten