Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Nuclear powered attack submarines are deployed in stealth … countries are not obliged to disclose patrols, or locations, especially in war or near-war conditions. Even the US. That’s the nature of this beast. This classification stems from their core role in intelligence-gathering, anti-submarine warfare, strike, and other sensitive missions... show more

Sandeep

36,386 subscribers

29,716 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

☝️The use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons to strike Russian territory would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. “We are not talking about authorizing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory—this is already being done with the help of unmanned aircraft and other means. However, when we are talking about the use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons, that is a completely different story. The fact is, and any expert from our country or the West will confirm this, the Ukrainian army is not able to operate such weapons on its own. Their effective use is only possible with targeting intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data that can only come from US or EU satellites—in other words, from NATO satellites. That is the first point. The second, and perhaps the key point, is that only NATO military personnel can program the flight missions for these missile systems; Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore, this is not about allowing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries are becoming directly involved in a military conflict or not. If such a decision is made, it would mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the US, and the EU in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then, bearing this in mind, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats that would be posed to us” - President Putin

☝️The use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons to strike Russian territory would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. “We are not talking about authorizing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory—this is already being done with the help of unmanned aircraft and other means. However, when we are talking about the use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons, that is a completely different story. The fact is, and any expert from our country or the West will confirm this, the Ukrainian army is not able to operate such weapons on its own. Their effective use is only possible with targeting intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data that can only come from US or EU satellites—in other words, from NATO satellites. That is the first point. The second, and perhaps the key point, is that only NATO military personnel can program the flight missions for these missile systems; Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore, this is not about allowing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries are becoming directly involved in a military conflict or not. If such a decision is made, it would mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the US, and the EU in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then, bearing this in mind, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats that would be posed to us” - President Putin

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

291,786 views • 10 months ago

NEW: Macron explained that once a peace agreement is signed—not during the war—there would be “reassurance forces” deployed away from the front lines, in places like Kyiv or Odesa. These would include British, French, and Turkish soldiers, whose role would be to train Ukrainian forces and help provide security, similar to how NATO countries already support states on the Alliance’s eastern flank. He emphasized that this would be done through an intergovernmental coalition, not NATO, with around twenty countries prepared to contribute on land, at sea, or in the air.

NEW: Macron explained that once a peace agreement is signed—not during the war—there would be “reassurance forces” deployed away from the front lines, in places like Kyiv or Odesa. These would include British, French, and Turkish soldiers, whose role would be to train Ukrainian forces and help provide security, similar to how NATO countries already support states on the Alliance’s eastern flank. He emphasized that this would be done through an intergovernmental coalition, not NATO, with around twenty countries prepared to contribute on land, at sea, or in the air.

Clash Report

273,662 views • 8 months ago

🇮🇷 "Our hands are full for the continuation of this war. We have nothing to worry about." Brigadier General Shafaei, directly addressing claims that Iran's ammunition has been destroyed: "You have no intelligence on them whatsoever. You don't even know where they are. And even if you did, they are in locations where you would have no ability to strike them."

🇮🇷 "Our hands are full for the continuation of this war. We have nothing to worry about." Brigadier General Shafaei, directly addressing claims that Iran's ammunition has been destroyed: "You have no intelligence on them whatsoever. You don't even know where they are. And even if you did, they are in locations where you would have no ability to strike them."

DD Geopolitics

17,247 views • 4 months ago

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio: The war in Ukraine has in many ways impeded the ability of Russia and the United States to find areas of agreement on other topics. We think it would be good for Russia if that war came to an end. The US remains open and willing to play a constructive role in bringing that war to an end if that opportunity presents itself. We [the US and Russia] are the two largest nuclear-armed countries on the planet. For us not to talk would be reckless and irresponsible. We have to have a relationship with the Russian government, even though we have areas of disagreement.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio: The war in Ukraine has in many ways impeded the ability of Russia and the United States to find areas of agreement on other topics. We think it would be good for Russia if that war came to an end. The US remains open and willing to play a constructive role in bringing that war to an end if that opportunity presents itself. We [the US and Russia] are the two largest nuclear-armed countries on the planet. For us not to talk would be reckless and irresponsible. We have to have a relationship with the Russian government, even though we have areas of disagreement.

Anton Gerashchenko

104,945 views • 29 days ago

'We did not strike Iran. I hope everyone will come to their senses' - Macron. 'I knew this - this [war] does not depend on us. We participate, we hold discussions, but we did not strike and, of course, we are not involved in it. We participate in defending countries that are under attack, when we have relevant agreements, solely in a defensive format. I hope everyone will come to their senses, because all of this, of course, has an impact on all the affected countries. It affects the global market. We have known since the beginning of this war that gas and oil prices have risen, as we are talking about approximately 20% of supplies passing through the Strait of Hormuz.' - SK

'We did not strike Iran. I hope everyone will come to their senses' - Macron. 'I knew this - this [war] does not depend on us. We participate, we hold discussions, but we did not strike and, of course, we are not involved in it. We participate in defending countries that are under attack, when we have relevant agreements, solely in a defensive format. I hope everyone will come to their senses, because all of this, of course, has an impact on all the affected countries. It affects the global market. We have known since the beginning of this war that gas and oil prices have risen, as we are talking about approximately 20% of supplies passing through the Strait of Hormuz.' - SK

Zlatti71

17,003 views • 5 months ago

Reporter: In March, the office of DNI concluded “Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear programs he suspended in 2003.” So what new intelligence does the U.S have since then that the Iranians have changed their position on nuclear weapons? And does this new intelligence come from U.S. Sources and methods, or are we getting this information from other countries?

Reporter: In March, the office of DNI concluded “Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear programs he suspended in 2003.” So what new intelligence does the U.S have since then that the Iranians have changed their position on nuclear weapons? And does this new intelligence come from U.S. Sources and methods, or are we getting this information from other countries?

Acyn

986,734 views • 1 year ago

JUST IN 🇮🇷🇺🇸: Iran's Foreign Minister on Attacks on Regional Countries and the Strait of Hormuz Dr. Abbas Araghchi: For some countries we consider friends, we have allowed passage through the Strait of Hormuz; we permitted China, Russia, India, Iraq, and Pakistan to pass. There is no reason to allow our enemy to pass through the Strait of Hormuz. The countries in the region had said verbally that they would not allow the US to use our land against Iran, but in practice, this happened. We cannot believe that this issue occurred without the knowledge of these countries. Our message to the countries of the region is not to allow their land, airspace, and sea to be used against us; we do not attack neighboring countries, only American bases and interests. Even in war, we attacked infrastructures whose shareholders are American. Anyone who participates in an attack on Iran will be a legitimate target of Iran's attacks. The US bases have been established to support Israel, and the US will sacrifice all the countries in the region to support the Zionists; I hope the countries of the region realize this.

JUST IN 🇮🇷🇺🇸: Iran's Foreign Minister on Attacks on Regional Countries and the Strait of Hormuz Dr. Abbas Araghchi: For some countries we consider friends, we have allowed passage through the Strait of Hormuz; we permitted China, Russia, India, Iraq, and Pakistan to pass. There is no reason to allow our enemy to pass through the Strait of Hormuz. The countries in the region had said verbally that they would not allow the US to use our land against Iran, but in practice, this happened. We cannot believe that this issue occurred without the knowledge of these countries. Our message to the countries of the region is not to allow their land, airspace, and sea to be used against us; we do not attack neighboring countries, only American bases and interests. Even in war, we attacked infrastructures whose shareholders are American. Anyone who participates in an attack on Iran will be a legitimate target of Iran's attacks. The US bases have been established to support Israel, and the US will sacrifice all the countries in the region to support the Zionists; I hope the countries of the region realize this.

Ryan Rozbiani

86,613 views • 4 months ago

A new Dunkin Donuts opened in “the hood” in South Central Los Angeles The location opened with just a drive thru and “Order Here” kiosks on the outside of the building. No indoor seating or walk-up counter service This is due to California crime. In higher crime neighborhoods food businesses are beginning to open locations where no indoor seating is an option In addition to being safer in crime heavy area, the business focuses more on to-go orders and drinks Drive thru only Dunkin’ locations are more commonly deployed in higher crime urban neighborhoods, which are overwhelmingly in Democrat led cities (this is supported by real data)

A new Dunkin Donuts opened in “the hood” in South Central Los Angeles The location opened with just a drive thru and “Order Here” kiosks on the outside of the building. No indoor seating or walk-up counter service This is due to California crime. In higher crime neighborhoods food businesses are beginning to open locations where no indoor seating is an option In addition to being safer in crime heavy area, the business focuses more on to-go orders and drinks Drive thru only Dunkin’ locations are more commonly deployed in higher crime urban neighborhoods, which are overwhelmingly in Democrat led cities (this is supported by real data)

Wall Street Apes

1,257,835 views • 4 months ago

And here we have Erika Kirk saying she doesn’t know how her husband would feel about the Iran war and whether or not he USA should get involved. WELL THAT’S WEIRD, ERIKA, ESPECIALLY BECAUSE THERE ARE COUNTLESS VIDEOS (ONES Y’ALL PROBABLY DELETED FROM THE REAL CHARLIE KIRK SHOW) WHERE CHARLIE WAS ADAMANTLY SAYING HE WAS AGAINST STARTING A WAR WITH IRAN. HE ALSO WENT TO DONALD TRUMP LAST SUMMER TO WARN HIM NOT TO ATTACK THEM THEN. YOU ARE NOT THIS IGNORANT, SO WE HAVE CONCLUDED THAT YOU ARE, IN FACT, EVIL.

And here we have Erika Kirk saying she doesn’t know how her husband would feel about the Iran war and whether or not he USA should get involved. WELL THAT’S WEIRD, ERIKA, ESPECIALLY BECAUSE THERE ARE COUNTLESS VIDEOS (ONES Y’ALL PROBABLY DELETED FROM THE REAL CHARLIE KIRK SHOW) WHERE CHARLIE WAS ADAMANTLY SAYING HE WAS AGAINST STARTING A WAR WITH IRAN. HE ALSO WENT TO DONALD TRUMP LAST SUMMER TO WARN HIM NOT TO ATTACK THEM THEN. YOU ARE NOT THIS IGNORANT, SO WE HAVE CONCLUDED THAT YOU ARE, IN FACT, EVIL.

Ginny Robinson

35,399 views • 4 months ago

🇮🇷🇷🇺🇨🇳 Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi, asked directly whether Russia and China are providing military support and targeting intelligence to Iran: "Russia and China are our strategic partners. We have had close cooperation in the past which continues still, and that includes military cooperation as well. I'm not going into any details of that." He then added: "We have good cooperation with these two countries. politically, economically, and even militarily." On the war itself: "This is not our war. This is an imposed war against us. We didn't start this war. It was an unprovoked, unwarranted, illegal act of aggression and we will continue to defend ourselves for as long as it takes, in order to end this war in a way that it will not be repeated in the future."

🇮🇷🇷🇺🇨🇳 Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi, asked directly whether Russia and China are providing military support and targeting intelligence to Iran: "Russia and China are our strategic partners. We have had close cooperation in the past which continues still, and that includes military cooperation as well. I'm not going into any details of that." He then added: "We have good cooperation with these two countries. politically, economically, and even militarily." On the war itself: "This is not our war. This is an imposed war against us. We didn't start this war. It was an unprovoked, unwarranted, illegal act of aggression and we will continue to defend ourselves for as long as it takes, in order to end this war in a way that it will not be repeated in the future."

DD Geopolitics

15,516 views • 5 months ago

🔥🔥🔥 I recorded this message to California & Los Angeles citizens a block away from my house. We are in a war with 2 enemies now: 1. The Newsom Fires™️: firefighters are handling that 2. The politicians who swore an oath to protect us but didn’t. Our weapons, X, media, RECALLS, & NEVER AGAIN VOTING FOR ANY INCUMBENT OR CAREER/ESTABLISHMENT POLITICIAN IN LA CITY OR COUNTY OR CALIFORNIA STATE. we are blessed to live in a nation where major political change can happen without any violence threat of it. Let’s take advantage of the tools that our ancestors have given us to completely revamp our leadership now and into the future. This is an existential war we are fighting. And we cannot afford to lose it. Winning the war against the fire without winning the war against our enemies in political office will be insufficient.

🔥🔥🔥 I recorded this message to California & Los Angeles citizens a block away from my house. We are in a war with 2 enemies now: 1. The Newsom Fires™️: firefighters are handling that 2. The politicians who swore an oath to protect us but didn’t. Our weapons, X, media, RECALLS, & NEVER AGAIN VOTING FOR ANY INCUMBENT OR CAREER/ESTABLISHMENT POLITICIAN IN LA CITY OR COUNTY OR CALIFORNIA STATE. we are blessed to live in a nation where major political change can happen without any violence threat of it. Let’s take advantage of the tools that our ancestors have given us to completely revamp our leadership now and into the future. This is an existential war we are fighting. And we cannot afford to lose it. Winning the war against the fire without winning the war against our enemies in political office will be insufficient.

Houman David Hemmati, MD, PhD

417,327 views • 1 year ago

“The fact that the Trump administration’s official explanation is that Bibi dragged us into this war, I don’t think that going to play well, not just with the left but with his base too. He doesn’t seem to care that they are very much against the idea of America going to war in the Middle East again, especially on behalf of the Israelis, whether that’s true or not.” “What we are seeing three days into this war is tactical brilliance and strategic bankruptcy, because every single day and sometimes every hour the explanation changes. And if we don’t know where we are going, then any road will take us there.”

“The fact that the Trump administration’s official explanation is that Bibi dragged us into this war, I don’t think that going to play well, not just with the left but with his base too. He doesn’t seem to care that they are very much against the idea of America going to war in the Middle East again, especially on behalf of the Israelis, whether that’s true or not.” “What we are seeing three days into this war is tactical brilliance and strategic bankruptcy, because every single day and sometimes every hour the explanation changes. And if we don’t know where we are going, then any road will take us there.”

Josh Rogin

14,567 views • 5 months ago

The main reason for America's defeat in #Afghanistan was #Pakistan 🇵🇰 This is an interview during the Afghan-American war 📢 American Captain John Hintz, who was deployed on the Afghan-Pakistani border, is describing the war situation. He says: If we take an area from them, we know they will not stop or come back. These non-Afghan fighters are very strong, they have more modern weapons than us and are much more numerous than us. When we fight them, we really know who we are fighting. The presenter asks: When you talk about non-Afghan fighters, where do they come from? Captain: Pakistan. We are only twelve to thirteen miles from Pakistan. If we kill thirty of their fighters in one day, it doesn't matter to them, they come back in even greater numbers the next day. Presenter: Are these fighters sincere in their purpose? (Captain: Surprised) Of all the battles I've fought, these are the ones most connected to my purpose!

The main reason for America's defeat in #Afghanistan was #Pakistan 🇵🇰 This is an interview during the Afghan-American war 📢 American Captain John Hintz, who was deployed on the Afghan-Pakistani border, is describing the war situation. He says: If we take an area from them, we know they will not stop or come back. These non-Afghan fighters are very strong, they have more modern weapons than us and are much more numerous than us. When we fight them, we really know who we are fighting. The presenter asks: When you talk about non-Afghan fighters, where do they come from? Captain: Pakistan. We are only twelve to thirteen miles from Pakistan. If we kill thirty of their fighters in one day, it doesn't matter to them, they come back in even greater numbers the next day. Presenter: Are these fighters sincere in their purpose? (Captain: Surprised) Of all the battles I've fought, these are the ones most connected to my purpose!

Voice Of Bangladeshi Muslims 🇧🇩

18,881 views • 10 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: Indian Army officer, Major Swathi Shantha Kumar, has won the UN Secretary General’s Award 2025 for her project 'Equal Partners, Lasting Peace'. She says, "I have been deployed in the UN Mission in South Sudan as the Engagement Platoon Commander of a team of 20 women soldiers who have been deployed since August 2024. We have just returned from the Mission area. This was the first time a woman peacekeeper or a team of women soldiers had been deployed in the UN Mission in South Sudan...We always conducted a gender-inclusive patrol, we ensured that women peacekeepers were always participating in operations and all activities. That is how we were able to move ahead in the Mission. This project is an indication of the actions which we have done because when we went into the Mission area, we realised that women soldiers are also required to be conducting patrols along with the male soldiers because it is very necessary...When we engaged with the community, initially they (women and children) had a little hesitation to speak to us. But once we started speaking to them continuously, we were able to get a good response from them; they were able to share their issues. This is what helped us in identifying that women's and men participation are equally important in peacekeeping operations. That is how we were able to conceptualise this project...We started conducting certain awareness camps against conflict-related sexual violence, we started sharing protection contact cards where we were able to share our contacts or emergency contacts and also identify certain areas or regions where we should be conducting more patrols. Because of the presence of UN in these regions, they were able to feel more confident and free in their movement..."

#WATCH | Delhi: Indian Army officer, Major Swathi Shantha Kumar, has won the UN Secretary General’s Award 2025 for her project 'Equal Partners, Lasting Peace'. She says, "I have been deployed in the UN Mission in South Sudan as the Engagement Platoon Commander of a team of 20 women soldiers who have been deployed since August 2024. We have just returned from the Mission area. This was the first time a woman peacekeeper or a team of women soldiers had been deployed in the UN Mission in South Sudan...We always conducted a gender-inclusive patrol, we ensured that women peacekeepers were always participating in operations and all activities. That is how we were able to move ahead in the Mission. This project is an indication of the actions which we have done because when we went into the Mission area, we realised that women soldiers are also required to be conducting patrols along with the male soldiers because it is very necessary...When we engaged with the community, initially they (women and children) had a little hesitation to speak to us. But once we started speaking to them continuously, we were able to get a good response from them; they were able to share their issues. This is what helped us in identifying that women's and men participation are equally important in peacekeeping operations. That is how we were able to conceptualise this project...We started conducting certain awareness camps against conflict-related sexual violence, we started sharing protection contact cards where we were able to share our contacts or emergency contacts and also identify certain areas or regions where we should be conducting more patrols. Because of the presence of UN in these regions, they were able to feel more confident and free in their movement..."

ANI

115,266 views • 5 months ago

Rep. Moulton: Although Russians losing the war, they're learning drone warfare, pioneered by Ukrainians. We're not doing that in United States, not training much with drones nor rapidly acquiring them. So Russians are now second to Ukraine in drones, but ahead of United States. That's of grave concern to me. We have not been modernizing quickly enough. We have not been making the trade-offs that we need to make in order to invest time, resources, intellectual capital, and monetary capital into this new kind of warfare. If Russia goes to war against the US or a NATO ally, they won't have as many tanks or aircraft and will be economically weakened. But their troops are more experienced in using and operating in this drone warfare environment than ours are.

Rep. Moulton: Although Russians losing the war, they're learning drone warfare, pioneered by Ukrainians. We're not doing that in United States, not training much with drones nor rapidly acquiring them. So Russians are now second to Ukraine in drones, but ahead of United States. That's of grave concern to me. We have not been modernizing quickly enough. We have not been making the trade-offs that we need to make in order to invest time, resources, intellectual capital, and monetary capital into this new kind of warfare. If Russia goes to war against the US or a NATO ally, they won't have as many tanks or aircraft and will be economically weakened. But their troops are more experienced in using and operating in this drone warfare environment than ours are.

Kate from Kharkiv

16,329 views • 1 month ago

There's no other way to describe it - Trump is insane. Greenland's defense literally consists of two dog sleds. Do you understand? Do you know what their defense is like? Two dog sleds—Trump. „Meanwhile, you have Russian and Chinese destroyers and submarines scattered across the sea. We will not allow this to happen. I mean, if it affects NATO, then so be it. But they need us far more than we need them.“ - Trump. 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 The Scandinavians refuted Trump's claim that the waters around Greenland are supposedly "overcrowded" with Russian and Chinese ships — FT According to diplomats from Scandinavian countries with access to NATO intelligence, no ships or submarines belonging to the Russian Federation or the People's Republic of China have been detected near Greenland in recent years. They confirmed that while Russia and China do have activities in the Arctic, they are not active in the Greenland region—Russian submarines operate primarily near Norway and the Barents Sea. The FT points out that Trump is using the issue of the "threat" posed by Russia and China as one of the arguments for bringing Greenland under US control.

There's no other way to describe it - Trump is insane. Greenland's defense literally consists of two dog sleds. Do you understand? Do you know what their defense is like? Two dog sleds—Trump. „Meanwhile, you have Russian and Chinese destroyers and submarines scattered across the sea. We will not allow this to happen. I mean, if it affects NATO, then so be it. But they need us far more than we need them.“ - Trump. 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 The Scandinavians refuted Trump's claim that the waters around Greenland are supposedly "overcrowded" with Russian and Chinese ships — FT According to diplomats from Scandinavian countries with access to NATO intelligence, no ships or submarines belonging to the Russian Federation or the People's Republic of China have been detected near Greenland in recent years. They confirmed that while Russia and China do have activities in the Arctic, they are not active in the Greenland region—Russian submarines operate primarily near Norway and the Barents Sea. The FT points out that Trump is using the issue of the "threat" posed by Russia and China as one of the arguments for bringing Greenland under US control.

Jürgen Nauditt 🇩🇪🇺🇦

194,624 views • 7 months ago

German Chancellor Merz on Iran War: The region must not slide into an eternal war with unclear goals. This war must be brought to an end with a clear plan, with a strategy. We are not participating in this war; we said that from day one. That remains the case for us. As long as the war continues, we will not participate in it with military means to ensure free navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. To this day, we are not aware of any concept as to how such an operation could succeed at all. The United States of America and Israel did not consult us before this war either. Regarding Iran, there has never been a joint decision on the 'whether.' Therefore, the question of how Germany will get involved militarily here does not arise. We will not do it.

German Chancellor Merz on Iran War: The region must not slide into an eternal war with unclear goals. This war must be brought to an end with a clear plan, with a strategy. We are not participating in this war; we said that from day one. That remains the case for us. As long as the war continues, we will not participate in it with military means to ensure free navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. To this day, we are not aware of any concept as to how such an operation could succeed at all. The United States of America and Israel did not consult us before this war either. Regarding Iran, there has never been a joint decision on the 'whether.' Therefore, the question of how Germany will get involved militarily here does not arise. We will not do it.

Clash Report

35,569 views • 5 months ago

Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to Gulf countries: If they have the right to take all necessary measures to protect their facilities, I think we are even. In fact, we have even more right to take all necessary measures to defend ourselves and protect our people. And this is exactly what we are doing. Know this: this is not our war. This is not our choice. This war was imposed on us. We are under aggression and we are defending ourselves. They cannot accuse us for things that happen on the other side. They should accuse those who started this war, and they should be held responsible for any damage inside Iran and in the region, because everything started with the United States and Israel.

Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to Gulf countries: If they have the right to take all necessary measures to protect their facilities, I think we are even. In fact, we have even more right to take all necessary measures to defend ourselves and protect our people. And this is exactly what we are doing. Know this: this is not our war. This is not our choice. This war was imposed on us. We are under aggression and we are defending ourselves. They cannot accuse us for things that happen on the other side. They should accuse those who started this war, and they should be held responsible for any damage inside Iran and in the region, because everything started with the United States and Israel.

Clash Report

94,449 views • 5 months ago

There is a lot of confusion right now about the sinking of the Iranian warship IRIS Dena and the role of the United States submarine in this incident. So let’s understand what most likely happened. First, the attack took place in international waters near Sri Lanka in the Indian Ocean. Second, the submarine involved was most likely a US nuclear powered attack submarine already operating somewhere in the Indian Ocean region. Many analysts believe it could have been operating from the broader operational area around Diego Garcia, a strategic military base used by the United States and the United Kingdom in the Indian Ocean. Unlike conventional submarines, nuclear submarines can stay underwater for months, because they do not need to surface for fuel. The only real limitation is food and crew endurance. So the submarine could easily remain in the region, quietly tracking naval movements. Now here is the timing part. The Iranian warship IRIS Dena had recently visited Visakhapatnam in India to participate in a multinational naval event hosted by the Indian Navy. After the exercise ended, the ship left Indian waters and began sailing west toward the Arabian Sea. If the submarine was tracking it, the most logical moment to strike would be after the ship left the exercise area and entered open international waters. That is when the torpedo strike reportedly happened near Sri Lanka. Now the next question people are asking is whether this was legal. Under the law of naval warfare, if two countries are in an armed conflict, a military vessel of the opposing side becomes a legitimate military target. Warships can be attacked even in international waters. In this case, the target was not a civilian vessel. It was a military warship of the Iranian navy. So from a naval warfare perspective, this kind of strike is generally considered permissible during active hostilities.

There is a lot of confusion right now about the sinking of the Iranian warship IRIS Dena and the role of the United States submarine in this incident. So let’s understand what most likely happened. First, the attack took place in international waters near Sri Lanka in the Indian Ocean. Second, the submarine involved was most likely a US nuclear powered attack submarine already operating somewhere in the Indian Ocean region. Many analysts believe it could have been operating from the broader operational area around Diego Garcia, a strategic military base used by the United States and the United Kingdom in the Indian Ocean. Unlike conventional submarines, nuclear submarines can stay underwater for months, because they do not need to surface for fuel. The only real limitation is food and crew endurance. So the submarine could easily remain in the region, quietly tracking naval movements. Now here is the timing part. The Iranian warship IRIS Dena had recently visited Visakhapatnam in India to participate in a multinational naval event hosted by the Indian Navy. After the exercise ended, the ship left Indian waters and began sailing west toward the Arabian Sea. If the submarine was tracking it, the most logical moment to strike would be after the ship left the exercise area and entered open international waters. That is when the torpedo strike reportedly happened near Sri Lanka. Now the next question people are asking is whether this was legal. Under the law of naval warfare, if two countries are in an armed conflict, a military vessel of the opposing side becomes a legitimate military target. Warships can be attacked even in international waters. In this case, the target was not a civilian vessel. It was a military warship of the Iranian navy. So from a naval warfare perspective, this kind of strike is generally considered permissible during active hostilities.

Praffulgarg

25,213 views • 5 months ago

The most logical explanation for the Great Flood described in many ancient cultures is a crustal displacement, or a core–mantle decoupling in which the upper layers slip by 90–104 degrees while the core continues rotating. This would lead to the spilling of the oceans over the land and drastic changes in the positions of the continents and the geographic North and South Poles. This scenario would also explain the mixed graveyards found in Alaska, where marine and land animals are discovered together in the same locations. This is the elite’s nightmare—an event that would render their bunkers useless.

The most logical explanation for the Great Flood described in many ancient cultures is a crustal displacement, or a core–mantle decoupling in which the upper layers slip by 90–104 degrees while the core continues rotating. This would lead to the spilling of the oceans over the land and drastic changes in the positions of the continents and the geographic North and South Poles. This scenario would also explain the mixed graveyards found in Alaska, where marine and land animals are discovered together in the same locations. This is the elite’s nightmare—an event that would render their bunkers useless.

Open Minded Approach

171,931 views • 7 months ago