Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang on how AI will transform work — and why we’ll be busier than ever "Everybody's jobs will be different. Mundane, arduous tasks become simple — we'll be far more productive. But here's the twist: With more productivity, we'll have more ideas to pursue. Elon and...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

462,771 subscribers

21,347 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

16 Kommentare

Profilbild von Wild On
Wild Onvor 9 Monaten

As the middle class and lower sink into oblivion There are plans for the tech Not for the unemployed masses No one is working on a plan for the masses They’re working ONLY on the tech INTELLIGENCE sans WISDOM

Profilbild von Mark_L
Mark_Lvor 9 Monaten

AI doesn’t replace us, it amplifies what we can do

Profilbild von Adam Bostock
Adam Bostockvor 9 Monaten

Until ASI arrives (~ 2030) then jobs will evaporate.

Profilbild von Vinod Bhardwaj
Vinod Bhardwajvor 9 Monaten

Is Jansen Huang insane, or is he gaslighting? How can both be true? "AI will be able to do all jobs better than humans. Work will be optional" Elon Musk. We will be busier than ever,

Profilbild von John E-gen 🔮
John E-gen 🔮vor 9 Monaten

AI time

Profilbild von Himanshu Kumar
Himanshu Kumarvor 9 Monaten

New tasks and ideas will keep us busy.

Profilbild von Lucho
Luchovor 9 Monaten

Wht an amazing time for hustlers and entrepreneurs 🔥

Profilbild von Pit Schultz
Pit Schultzvor 9 Monaten

this increasingly looks provincial, like a conference in dubai. hard to be taken serious. have you seen the Dram prices?

Profilbild von DonSchwartzJr
DonSchwartzJrvor 9 Monaten

ARTIFICIAL MEANS FAKE!

Profilbild von Rahul Raghav
Rahul Raghavvor 9 Monaten

sounds like we'll be automating the grind to make room for more creative work

Profilbild von no name
no namevor 9 Monaten

What about artists? Today someone with no skill can create amazing digital art.

Profilbild von naseem javed
naseem javedvor 9 Monaten

AI-Centric Economic Evolution: The proven capacity of a national economy to maintain continuous real growth, full entrepreneurial deployment, and fiscal purity under extreme technological acceleration and global competition.

Profilbild von Stunning and Brave
Stunning and Bravevor 9 Monaten

Is that a Cascade or a Tide pod in the background?

Profilbild von JakeZ1979
JakeZ1979vor 9 Monaten

Basically, dumb people will replace talented people.

Profilbild von DonSchwartzJr
DonSchwartzJrvor 9 Monaten

DON'T BE IN A RUSH TO GET NO WHERE!

Profilbild von Mykhailo Sorochuk
Mykhailo Sorochukvor 9 Monaten

Totally agree. More productivity means more opportunities, but also more burnout if we're not careful. Balance is key

Ähnliche Videos

📁 Jensen Huang says AI did not end radiologists. Hinton predicted radiology would be 100 percent AI. And it happened. But the number of radiologists grew. AI automated the task, not the purpose. Higher productivity, more patients, more revenue and more humans doing higher value work.
2:02

📁 Jensen Huang says AI did not end radiologists. Hinton predicted radiology would be 100 percent AI. And it happened. But the number of radiologists grew. AI automated the task, not the purpose. Higher productivity, more patients, more revenue and more humans doing higher value work.

Jon Hernandez

53,503 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Jensen Huang on why AI won't give workers more free time but will make them busier than ever: He explains it by separating two ideas most people conflate: task versus purpose. He starts by drawing a critical distinction: "The purpose versus the task of a job has to be separated. The task of a radiologist includes studying scans, but the purpose of the job is to work with clinicians and doctors and patients to help diagnose disease." When AI handles tasks faster, the purpose expands to fill the new capacity. Jensen uses radiologists as a real-world example: "The fact that these radiologists can now study scans so fast, they order more scans from more modalities. As a result, they're able to onboard patients a lot more quickly. The number of patients in a hospital can go up. The hospital is making more money taking care of more patients. Radiologists busier than ever." He sees the exact same pattern playing out with his own engineering team: "Our company 100% of software engineers are now supported by agents. They're busier than ever because their experimentation is coming back a lot more quickly. Every single idea expressed in the code instantaneously." The result is greater ambition rather than less work: "We're exploring more ideas, more software engineers are working with each other, coming up with new ideas, new problems that we never even think of solving before because we just didn't have the time to do before." His conclusion challenges the popular narrative around AI and free time: "I think most people have this wrong. I think that the fact that we're now so productive, we can experiment, iterate so fast, we're going to be busier than ever."
1:21

Jensen Huang on why AI won't give workers more free time but will make them busier than ever: He explains it by separating two ideas most people conflate: task versus purpose. He starts by drawing a critical distinction: "The purpose versus the task of a job has to be separated. The task of a radiologist includes studying scans, but the purpose of the job is to work with clinicians and doctors and patients to help diagnose disease." When AI handles tasks faster, the purpose expands to fill the new capacity. Jensen uses radiologists as a real-world example: "The fact that these radiologists can now study scans so fast, they order more scans from more modalities. As a result, they're able to onboard patients a lot more quickly. The number of patients in a hospital can go up. The hospital is making more money taking care of more patients. Radiologists busier than ever." He sees the exact same pattern playing out with his own engineering team: "Our company 100% of software engineers are now supported by agents. They're busier than ever because their experimentation is coming back a lot more quickly. Every single idea expressed in the code instantaneously." The result is greater ambition rather than less work: "We're exploring more ideas, more software engineers are working with each other, coming up with new ideas, new problems that we never even think of solving before because we just didn't have the time to do before." His conclusion challenges the popular narrative around AI and free time: "I think most people have this wrong. I think that the fact that we're now so productive, we can experiment, iterate so fast, we're going to be busier than ever."

Big Brain AI

24,772 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Jensen Huang says Geoffrey Hinton predicted 5 years ago that AI would replace radiologists and he’s right — but not in the way people expected. AI has swept the whole field. Today, just about every radiologist is using AI in some way. But here’s the twist: the number of radiologists actually grew. Why? Because their real purpose isn’t studying the image — it’s diagnosing disease. AI now studies images faster, more precisely, in 3D instead of 2D, without mistakes or fatigue. Meaning radiologists can diagnose more people than ever before. Hospitals get better economics → serve more patients → and hire more radiologists.
1:50

Jensen Huang says Geoffrey Hinton predicted 5 years ago that AI would replace radiologists and he’s right — but not in the way people expected. AI has swept the whole field. Today, just about every radiologist is using AI in some way. But here’s the twist: the number of radiologists actually grew. Why? Because their real purpose isn’t studying the image — it’s diagnosing disease. AI now studies images faster, more precisely, in 3D instead of 2D, without mistakes or fatigue. Meaning radiologists can diagnose more people than ever before. Hospitals get better economics → serve more patients → and hire more radiologists.

Ian Miles

302,448 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang on AI: The fact that this is going to be the end of humanity—it's complete nonsense. The fact that this is going to destroy half of the American jobs—it's complete nonsense. AI will increase productivity. When productivity is increased, it creates opportunities. Over the history of technology, society has become more productive as a result of technology. It has created more jobs, not less. Source: Axios
0:49

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang on AI: The fact that this is going to be the end of humanity—it's complete nonsense. The fact that this is going to destroy half of the American jobs—it's complete nonsense. AI will increase productivity. When productivity is increased, it creates opportunities. Over the history of technology, society has become more productive as a result of technology. It has created more jobs, not less. Source: Axios

Clash Report

16,704 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

$NVDA CEO Jensen Huang said demand has gone parabolic because agentic AI has arrived, AI can now do productive work and tokens are becoming profitable. If tokens are profitable then model builders have a reason to produce more of them which means more inference, more compute and more demand across networking, memory, CPUs, power and data centers. The near-term stock reaction is about expectations but long-term story is still that the AI factory buildout is running through Nvidia which is why I think it has a real path to becoming the world’s first $10T company.
0:24

$NVDA CEO Jensen Huang said demand has gone parabolic because agentic AI has arrived, AI can now do productive work and tokens are becoming profitable. If tokens are profitable then model builders have a reason to produce more of them which means more inference, more compute and more demand across networking, memory, CPUs, power and data centers. The near-term stock reaction is about expectations but long-term story is still that the AI factory buildout is running through Nvidia which is why I think it has a real path to becoming the world’s first $10T company.

Shay Boloor

261,814 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

JENSEN HUANG CALLED OUT EVERY CEO WHO’S BEEN FIRING PEOPLE “BECAUSE OF AI.” JIM CRAMER ASKED HIM WHY COMPANIES ARE LAYING PEOPLE OFF IF AI IS SUPPOSED TO MAKE EVERYONE MORE PRODUCTIVE. JENSEN’S RESPONSE: “FOR COMPANIES WITH IMAGINATION, YOU WILL DO MORE WITH MORE. FOR COMPANIES WHERE THE LEADERSHIP IS JUST OUT OF IDEAS, THEY HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO DO. THEY HAVE NO REASON TO IMAGINE BEYOND WHAT THEY ARE TODAY. WHEN THEY GAIN MORE CAPABILITY, THEY DON’T DO MORE.”
1:38

JENSEN HUANG CALLED OUT EVERY CEO WHO’S BEEN FIRING PEOPLE “BECAUSE OF AI.” JIM CRAMER ASKED HIM WHY COMPANIES ARE LAYING PEOPLE OFF IF AI IS SUPPOSED TO MAKE EVERYONE MORE PRODUCTIVE. JENSEN’S RESPONSE: “FOR COMPANIES WITH IMAGINATION, YOU WILL DO MORE WITH MORE. FOR COMPANIES WHERE THE LEADERSHIP IS JUST OUT OF IDEAS, THEY HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO DO. THEY HAVE NO REASON TO IMAGINE BEYOND WHAT THEY ARE TODAY. WHEN THEY GAIN MORE CAPABILITY, THEY DON’T DO MORE.”

Vivek Sen

183,883 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Sam Altman just said the future of work won’t look like work At TreeHacks 2026, Sam Altman said something wild: Jobs in 100 years will be as unrecognizable to us as our jobs would be to people 300 years ago. AI will take over more and more operational work. And instead of obsessing over machines, humans may end up focusing more on each other. Which raises a bigger question: If AI does most of the work… do we even keep the concept of “jobs”? 👀
0:29

Sam Altman just said the future of work won’t look like work At TreeHacks 2026, Sam Altman said something wild: Jobs in 100 years will be as unrecognizable to us as our jobs would be to people 300 years ago. AI will take over more and more operational work. And instead of obsessing over machines, humans may end up focusing more on each other. Which raises a bigger question: If AI does most of the work… do we even keep the concept of “jobs”? 👀

VraserX e/acc

15,367 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

"The more that you let them think about things, the better the results will be." The newest AI agents are more capable because they are designed to take time, reason through problems, and make a plan. Our latest AI Explainer breaks down why giving agents more time produces proportionally better results.
1:32

"The more that you let them think about things, the better the results will be." The newest AI agents are more capable because they are designed to take time, reason through problems, and make a plan. Our latest AI Explainer breaks down why giving agents more time produces proportionally better results.

Box

2,974,585 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Jensen Huang said fears about AI destroying jobs are nonsense driven by people making things up. Then he gave the most concrete proof I have ever heard. He called it the radiology story. 12 years ago one of the world's most respected computer scientists made a prediction. Computer vision had become superhuman at reading medical scans. It never got tired. It never missed a detail. So he said radiology was finished. He advised nobody to enter the field. The job was going to be wiped out. Jensen said he was absolutely right. Computer vision did penetrate every single radiology stack. Every radiologist today is augmented by it. The task of reading scans became automated. Then the opposite of the prediction happened. Radiology demand went up. The number of radiologists in the world went up. The reason is the distinction Jensen kept coming back to the whole talk. Task versus purpose. The task of a radiologist is reading scans. The purpose is working with doctors to diagnose disease. When the task got automated, radiologists got more productive. More productive meant more patients admitted. More patients meant more scans. More scans meant more profit. More profit meant they hired more radiologists. The field the expert said would be wiped out needed more people than before. Jensen's point was not that AI creates no disruption. His point was that people confuse the task with the job and then make predictions that cause real damage. Fewer people trained in radiology because of that speech. Now there is a shortage. Someone recently said 90% of software coding will disappear. Jensen said Nvidia is hiring more software engineers than ever. Coding is not a software engineer's job. Solving problems is. When you automate the task, you free the person to do the actual job. That is not a job loss. That is an upgrade.
1:37

Jensen Huang said fears about AI destroying jobs are nonsense driven by people making things up. Then he gave the most concrete proof I have ever heard. He called it the radiology story. 12 years ago one of the world's most respected computer scientists made a prediction. Computer vision had become superhuman at reading medical scans. It never got tired. It never missed a detail. So he said radiology was finished. He advised nobody to enter the field. The job was going to be wiped out. Jensen said he was absolutely right. Computer vision did penetrate every single radiology stack. Every radiologist today is augmented by it. The task of reading scans became automated. Then the opposite of the prediction happened. Radiology demand went up. The number of radiologists in the world went up. The reason is the distinction Jensen kept coming back to the whole talk. Task versus purpose. The task of a radiologist is reading scans. The purpose is working with doctors to diagnose disease. When the task got automated, radiologists got more productive. More productive meant more patients admitted. More patients meant more scans. More scans meant more profit. More profit meant they hired more radiologists. The field the expert said would be wiped out needed more people than before. Jensen's point was not that AI creates no disruption. His point was that people confuse the task with the job and then make predictions that cause real damage. Fewer people trained in radiology because of that speech. Now there is a shortage. Someone recently said 90% of software coding will disappear. Jensen said Nvidia is hiring more software engineers than ever. Coding is not a software engineer's job. Solving problems is. When you automate the task, you free the person to do the actual job. That is not a job loss. That is an upgrade.

Ihtesham Ali

14,806 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

DAVID SACKS, CHAMATH, AND NAVAL MADE THE CASE FOR AI OPTIMISM: AI COULD CREATE MORE JOBS THAN IT DISPLACES. SACKS: “WE DON'T KNOW THAT JOBS ARE ACTUALLY GOING TO BE LOST. YOU'RE MAKING A HUGE ASSUMPTION THAT'S BUYING INTO DOOMERISM.” NAVAL: “TECHNOLOGY DOES DESTROY JOBS BUT IT REPLACES THEM WITH OPPORTUNITIES THAT ARE BETTER.” “WE WILL SEE JOB CREATION BY AI THAT WILL BE FASTER THAN JOB DESTRUCTION.” SACKS: “YOU END UP WITH MORE NET PRODUCTIVITY AND WEALTH CREATION.”
4:44

DAVID SACKS, CHAMATH, AND NAVAL MADE THE CASE FOR AI OPTIMISM: AI COULD CREATE MORE JOBS THAN IT DISPLACES. SACKS: “WE DON'T KNOW THAT JOBS ARE ACTUALLY GOING TO BE LOST. YOU'RE MAKING A HUGE ASSUMPTION THAT'S BUYING INTO DOOMERISM.” NAVAL: “TECHNOLOGY DOES DESTROY JOBS BUT IT REPLACES THEM WITH OPPORTUNITIES THAT ARE BETTER.” “WE WILL SEE JOB CREATION BY AI THAT WILL BE FASTER THAN JOB DESTRUCTION.” SACKS: “YOU END UP WITH MORE NET PRODUCTIVITY AND WEALTH CREATION.”

Vivek Sen

11,399 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Should we be worried about labour displacement at the hands of AI? "Short term, yes. Long term, no. In the near term, AI is creating real disruption, with large layoffs and thousands of people being displaced from existing jobs. Over the long run, there are far more problems to solve than people currently working on them. If AI makes engineers more abundant and productive, we can redirect that talent toward solving problems that were previously uneconomic or impossible to tackle." Matan Grinberg Do you agree and what does no one consider that everyone should with regards to future of labour Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 Matt Miller Shaun Maguire Vinod Khosla
0:43

Should we be worried about labour displacement at the hands of AI? "Short term, yes. Long term, no. In the near term, AI is creating real disruption, with large layoffs and thousands of people being displaced from existing jobs. Over the long run, there are far more problems to solve than people currently working on them. If AI makes engineers more abundant and productive, we can redirect that talent toward solving problems that were previously uneconomic or impossible to tackle." Matan Grinberg Do you agree and what does no one consider that everyone should with regards to future of labour Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 Matt Miller Shaun Maguire Vinod Khosla

Harry Stebbings

22,279 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🇺🇸 DAVID FRIEDBERG: AI WILL SUPERCHARGE VIDEO GAMES FAR MORE THAN SOCIAL MEDIA "Do you spend more time on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? Importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit and drive more hours spent from AI? I think AI will ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment. You can create more dynamic, engaging experiences than you can with traditional content or social media." Source: The All-In Podcast, david friedberg
5:18

🇺🇸 DAVID FRIEDBERG: AI WILL SUPERCHARGE VIDEO GAMES FAR MORE THAN SOCIAL MEDIA "Do you spend more time on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? Importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit and drive more hours spent from AI? I think AI will ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment. You can create more dynamic, engaging experiences than you can with traditional content or social media." Source: The All-In Podcast, david friedberg

Mario Nawfal

116,822 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

📁 Geoffrey Hinton says the impact of AI will be radical and deeply uncertain. Many jobs will disappear and there is no guarantee new ones will replace them. AI will massively boost productivity, but the real issue is not technological. It is political. How wealth is distributed when work is no longer required. More productivity does not guarantee a better future. Without systemic change, it could mean the opposite.
0:42

📁 Geoffrey Hinton says the impact of AI will be radical and deeply uncertain. Many jobs will disappear and there is no guarantee new ones will replace them. AI will massively boost productivity, but the real issue is not technological. It is political. How wealth is distributed when work is no longer required. More productivity does not guarantee a better future. Without systemic change, it could mean the opposite.

Jon Hernandez

14,036 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

.tylercowen on why AI creates more jobs than it destroys: "One of the neatest properties of current AI models is they allow a small number of individuals working with AI to really do a lot more work than was possible previously." "This will mean more companies, more projects, more nonprofits, just more ventures." "One area is generally energy, electricity, the grid... It's completely screwed up. It will take twenty years, thirty years, forty years to fix... The AIs cannot do that on their own." "The biomedical sector and medical trials, there will be many, many, many more ideas to test. AIs will help with the testing, but I don't think pure testing by simulation will be possible anytime soon." "Simply care for the elderly. There will be robots, personal companions. We have this already. But the elderly also will want human care. It wouldn't surprise me if in the future, fifteen, twenty percent of all jobs were elderly care." "Luis Garicano had an excellent online essay. He referred to what he called 'messy jobs': jobs where it's hard to explain exactly what the job is, but on a given day you're doing eleven different things, and it requires coordination and figuring out what you ought to do next and getting other people to help you... There's a real future in messy jobs." Tyler Cowen with Wyatt
2:31

.tylercowen on why AI creates more jobs than it destroys: "One of the neatest properties of current AI models is they allow a small number of individuals working with AI to really do a lot more work than was possible previously." "This will mean more companies, more projects, more nonprofits, just more ventures." "One area is generally energy, electricity, the grid... It's completely screwed up. It will take twenty years, thirty years, forty years to fix... The AIs cannot do that on their own." "The biomedical sector and medical trials, there will be many, many, many more ideas to test. AIs will help with the testing, but I don't think pure testing by simulation will be possible anytime soon." "Simply care for the elderly. There will be robots, personal companions. We have this already. But the elderly also will want human care. It wouldn't surprise me if in the future, fifteen, twenty percent of all jobs were elderly care." "Luis Garicano had an excellent online essay. He referred to what he called 'messy jobs': jobs where it's hard to explain exactly what the job is, but on a given day you're doing eleven different things, and it requires coordination and figuring out what you ought to do next and getting other people to help you... There's a real future in messy jobs." Tyler Cowen with Wyatt

a16z

193,215 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

see the thing is, he was already being positive by constraining ai job displacement to "entry-level" work, and claiming only 50% displacement instead of 110% or 200% (GDP growth utopia!) and he led with how exciting this whole ai disruption thing is just like any other major disruption that took us from farming to factory to knowledge work and internet and computer and so it'll all be swell if we prepare people for all this ai disruption by buying more of the ai he's selling because the more ai we buy the more protected from the ai disruption we will all be!
1:53

see the thing is, he was already being positive by constraining ai job displacement to "entry-level" work, and claiming only 50% displacement instead of 110% or 200% (GDP growth utopia!) and he led with how exciting this whole ai disruption thing is just like any other major disruption that took us from farming to factory to knowledge work and internet and computer and so it'll all be swell if we prepare people for all this ai disruption by buying more of the ai he's selling because the more ai we buy the more protected from the ai disruption we will all be!

Susan Zhang

19,077 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The IDF are now committing MORE than one massacre at the SAME TIME so that ppl will not be able to focus on them all and they can get away with more crimes!!!
2:20

The IDF are now committing MORE than one massacre at the SAME TIME so that ppl will not be able to focus on them all and they can get away with more crimes!!!

𓂆 𝓁𝓊𝓁𝓊 🧸

561,477 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

We are glad to inform you that more than 90% of the work is behind us. Added PVE content outside the city with monsters and missions. More news on the work done will be very soon. #LUNC #LUNCcommunity #OGMuji #OGCacti
1:05

We are glad to inform you that more than 90% of the work is behind us. Added PVE content outside the city with monsters and missions. More news on the work done will be very soon. #LUNC #LUNCcommunity #OGMuji #OGCacti

METAGLORIA

82,813 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren