正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
@official .jgetlit is an Instagram account run by James Dekle, a content creator from Florida (often Tampa area). Key Stats (as of recent data):~910K–913K followers ~4,680 posts Very active with reels and photos Content Focus:Rizz (charisma/pick-up skills), lifestyle, curls/fitness, dating advice, and viral POV-style skits. He creates humorous or... show more
18,379 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)
0 条评论
暂无评论
原始帖子的评论将显示在这里
相关视频
![Whitney Webb describes how shootings like Charlie Kirk's drive a Palantir-powered push (since Trump 1.0) "to legalize pre-crime" "The [idea's] to have AI scour...social media...&...use an algorithm to determine which...users [are] exhibiting...neuropsychiatric warning signs" This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout, is taken from an interview with Marty Bent posted to the TFTC (TFTC) YouTube channel on September 27, 2025. -----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "What's important too is, you know, back at the end of 2019 when all this was going on, Trump, was still was in office the first time, and all of these, you know, mass shootings were happening and there was an outcry about it, like the El Paso Walmart shooting, for example, and a few other things that took place in a relatively short period of time. "And what's interesting about that is before those shootings happened, not long before, William Barr, who was Attorney General, gave this speech where he basically was like, we need to remove encryption. We have to have a federal backdoor into everything encrypted, all encrypted software. And we'll eventually get that, because what he called a galvanizing event would soon happen that would help reduce Americans' resistance to that policy. "And then all of these shootings happen. And then, in that same. And then not long after that, William Barr, makes pre crime an official policy of the Department of Justice. So he set up the infrastructure to legalize pre-crime at that time in October 2019. And so it's been being built on ever since, but they haven't really necessarily made it, deployed it massively. "But they've set up the legal infrastructure to legalize it and they created a program under which the DOJ has made a few arrests that's called DEEP. It's an acronym. I forget exactly what it stands for. But they've made a few arrests where they've arrested people preemptively for social media posts. "And then in that same period of time also Trump came out, as, and his touted response to these mass shootings was to have social media sites deploy some sort of software program that would detect shooters before they can act. So continuing to build on this pre-crime thing. "And at the time, he was being pitched, and the biggest lobbyists in the administration for it was Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump, to create this new agency, a Health DARPA or a HARPA, they called it, and the first program of it, the, the pilot program of it was called Safe Homes, which is again another very long acronym for something that I don't remember. Sorry. But basically the idea of it was to have AI scour American social media posts en masse and then use an algorithm to determine which posts show users exhibiting early neuro psychiatric warning signs, and that if they were, you know, flagged, they could be triaged to a variety of, of solutions like Court ordered physicians or psychiatrists. Or like potentially house arrest just for having social media posts that the AI has determined is bad. It's, it's very messed up. "So, you know, ultimately they didn't make HARPA, but Biden made Harpa. It's called ARPA H. And the same architects of the Harpa that was being pitched under Trump ended up being the same architects of Biden's ARPA H. But ARPA H was sold as a cancer moonshot. We're going to cure cancer with ARPA H. But I mean, ARPA H is absolutely still around and still has these kinds of, of this kind of focus in addition to its health focus. "So, unfortunately, you know, the Trump administration, or at least Trump as a president, has that precedent from his previous administration responding to concerns about guns by being like, we should apply pre-crime to American social media posts and determine who might be a bad actor before they commit any crime. "And from the civil liberty perspective, this is terrible. And an even greater warning sign is the increasing involvement, which you brought up earlier, Marty, of Palantir in this administration. Because Palantir is, was specifically really created to be a pre-crime entity. It is a successor to this, post 9/11 program that was housed in DARPA called Total Information Awareness. And it's, it's, you know, been a Palantir since then, has been piloting predictive policing, you know, throughout the country. "I think they first started doing that in the 2014/2015 window. And you know, they, they, because of their connections, with all of, you know, pretty much every US Intelligence agency and how much data they hoover up and on every American having Palantir, you know, be involved in the government so extensively and also now in like your taxes, like their recent partnership with like the IRS and you know, with mortgages and like increasingly getting involved with finances and also, you know, running a lot of major Wall street banks. "You know, it could potentially get very, very complicated. And so we're sort of at this stage where a lot of this infrastructure is starting to come together and in order to get people to relinquish civil liberties enough to have this kind of predictive policing infrastructure be the norm, something really big has to happen. People have to get really angry and more importantly, people have to get really insecure and fearful. And so, you know, I worry that this is sort of a, you know, an important moment, an inflection point where they're going to try and start pushing us in that direction."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1971979087272202610/amplify_video_thumb/1971973487159128064/img/iyIXcdUw1CiJlhyP.jpg)
5:42
Sensitive content
My response to James White’s calls for me to be doxxed: Earlier today on the Dividing Line, 𝔚𝔥𝔦𝔱𝔢𝔅𝔢𝔞𝔯𝔡 spent about five minutes talking about how vile of an anon I am, based on a recent tweet, which was a joke at his expense. If you’d like to see what I said, I spliced it into the video below at the appropriate time, but essentially James White was imagining out loud the grin on Doug Wilson’s face while Doug wrote about the Corey Mahler debate. I said that James needed to start using the “no homo” disclaimer. I’m sure he doesn’t know what that means, but it’s very common slang among men. “Don’t be so gay” is what I was saying. I’ve also mocked his shirts and sweaters in a similar way. It obviously annoys him. Whatever. James White referred to this tweet as “sexual innuendo,” which is not correct. I was not insinuating that he and Doug Wilson are a gay couple. It was a joke. Did it cross the line? I don’t think so. Did it walk right up to the line? Maybe. But keep in mind that James White didn’t know what TLDR meant without looking it up. He’s a bit out of his element on 𝕏. Stuff goes over his head. So then, James brought up the Treble Woe situation. Woe had some very sexually explicit posts get revealed and shared on 𝕏. There was talk of anal sex and all sorts of other things, which no one approves of including me. I defended Woe from those (like White) who were demanding re-repentance, basically a pound of flesh. I didn’t think that was biblically warranted. But James said today that my tweet was comparable to what Woe said! That’s literally insane. I don’t talk that way. I’ve never talked that way. But since James didn’t actually say what I said, everyone will just believe it was exactly like what Woe said. Really nasty stuff. Very underhanded. Also very on brand. And as an aside, isn’t it interesting that James White just loves the “Hitler Hated Christ” anon account who outed Woe’s prior spicy posts? I guess all anons are equal, but some anons are more equal than others. Next, James White attempted to make a biblical argument for doxxing me, such that my church could discipline me appropriately for saying “no homo.” He believes this needs to happen so that I don’t infect my church. Here is my response to that: I am not anonymous. I am pseudonymous because of the organization I work for. But, I have an ID-verified account that is monetized, so I’m very real. Several godly men (you would know them) on this platform know who I am, and I would welcome their rebuke for anything I say, for they are dear friends. I am a faithful member (not a pastor) of a Bible-believing church. It is a dispy Baptist church that I do not agree with on soteriology, covenant theology, or eschatology. I love the people there, and they love me. I don’t bring up my unique perspectives because I don’t want to divide the church. I’m not as old as James White, but I’m older than his kids. I’ve been married for over a decade and have multiple children. I used to use a lot more coarse language on this platform, but I was convicted about that several years ago. My content is rated PG, but it’s 1980s PG if that makes sense. Most of what I do is post clips and give commentary, and I’m willing to criticize or defend anyone if I feel they deserve it. So that’s me. I’m not a monster. I’m not vile or vulgar. There’s just no evidence of that. In closing, thank you to everyone that has supported me. I hope my content will continue to be of value to you going forward. If you see anyone trying to dox me, please let me know and report them. I appreciate it. God bless.
Defiant Baptist
110,091 次观看 • 1 年前
