Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Oh Chris, ECHR governs human rights, while asylum claims are processed under the 1951 Refugee Convention. Leaving ECHR wouldn't accelerate deportations, it would merely strip British citizens of fundamental rights while creating years of legal chaos #bbcbreakfast #r4today

AttleeSarah80's profile picture

Sarah Attlee

3,575 subscribers

55,969 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

#bbcbreakfast#r4today
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

“Taking us out of the European Court of Human Rights I think is absolutely fundamental to allow us to take back control of our borders Conservative Kieran Mullan says leaving the ECHR is a “genuine, concrete plan” to overhaul the asylum system #bbcqt
1:56

“Taking us out of the European Court of Human Rights I think is absolutely fundamental to allow us to take back control of our borders Conservative Kieran Mullan says leaving the ECHR is a “genuine, concrete plan” to overhaul the asylum system #bbcqt

BBC Question Time

41,754 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

C4News, "Should we abandon the European Convention on Human Rights, something we played a big part in setting up?" Conservative Councillor Paul Mason, "I think we should.. I'd like to add: Australia, Canada and New Zealand are not in the ECHR" *Countries outside of Europe are not in a European convention🤷‍♂️* Lord Dubs, "The ECHR was started by Churchill.. He said the sort of country we are needs to protect our rights.. That is a British tradition.. Are we going to turn our backs on that?" "Yes, the world has moved on but the basic principles of protecting vulnerable people is still there" "I fly the British flag with pride. I think this is a wonderful country. And our contribution to human rights has been first class" Alf Dubs then asks what difference leaving the ECHR would make to addressing asylum seekers on small boats Conservative Councillor Paul Mason waffles
2:53

C4News, "Should we abandon the European Convention on Human Rights, something we played a big part in setting up?" Conservative Councillor Paul Mason, "I think we should.. I'd like to add: Australia, Canada and New Zealand are not in the ECHR" *Countries outside of Europe are not in a European convention🤷‍♂️* Lord Dubs, "The ECHR was started by Churchill.. He said the sort of country we are needs to protect our rights.. That is a British tradition.. Are we going to turn our backs on that?" "Yes, the world has moved on but the basic principles of protecting vulnerable people is still there" "I fly the British flag with pride. I think this is a wonderful country. And our contribution to human rights has been first class" Alf Dubs then asks what difference leaving the ECHR would make to addressing asylum seekers on small boats Conservative Councillor Paul Mason waffles

Farrukh

105,766 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

7 Turkish citizens living under the protection of the United Nations in Nairobi/Kenya were kidnapped by unidentified persons. While 3 of these people were released later, it is not yet clear what happened to the other 4 people 😔 UN Human Rights Commissioner for Human Rights Amnesty International Human Rights Watch UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency
1:31

7 Turkish citizens living under the protection of the United Nations in Nairobi/Kenya were kidnapped by unidentified persons. While 3 of these people were released later, it is not yet clear what happened to the other 4 people 😔 UN Human Rights Commissioner for Human Rights Amnesty International Human Rights Watch UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

erdem gençay

18,678 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In 2022 Tory leadership hopeful Tom Tugendhat categorically ruled out leaving the ECHR Today he’s running around suggesting he would be willing to put the UK in the company of Russia & Belarus as the only European countries outside the human rights convention Watch in disbelief
2:14

In 2022 Tory leadership hopeful Tom Tugendhat categorically ruled out leaving the ECHR Today he’s running around suggesting he would be willing to put the UK in the company of Russia & Belarus as the only European countries outside the human rights convention Watch in disbelief

Peter Stefanovic

284,074 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Britain’s borders are utterly broken. As I say on GB News, we need to: Leave the ECHR Repeal Blair’s Human Rights Act Detain and deport End welfare/social housing for non-British citizens And put British people first All set out in Suicide of a Nation
1:05

Britain’s borders are utterly broken. As I say on GB News, we need to: Leave the ECHR Repeal Blair’s Human Rights Act Detain and deport End welfare/social housing for non-British citizens And put British people first All set out in Suicide of a Nation

Matt Goodwin

43,720 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Afghan migrants secretly flown in by our government are now suing for £1 billion, while British pensioners freeze, and veterans sleep on the streets. The European Convention of Human Rights now governs who we house, who we fund, and who we prioritise. It’s not just foreign migrants being flown in, it’s your rights being flown out.
3:16

Afghan migrants secretly flown in by our government are now suing for £1 billion, while British pensioners freeze, and veterans sleep on the streets. The European Convention of Human Rights now governs who we house, who we fund, and who we prioritise. It’s not just foreign migrants being flown in, it’s your rights being flown out.

Advance UK

44,779 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Robert Jenrick, "I do actually supporting leaving the European Convention of Human Rights" Shami Chakrabarti, "The ECHR have protected British people from abuse of power by their own government on occasions.. And they've protected people all over the council of Europe (46 member states with a population of approximately 675 million)" "There are currently interim measures against Putin's Russia to protect Ukrainian prisoners of war from being executed" Robert Jenrick, "Why won't you trust British judges?" Shami Chakrabarti, "British judges have no jurisdiction in Ukraine and Russia"
0:49

Robert Jenrick, "I do actually supporting leaving the European Convention of Human Rights" Shami Chakrabarti, "The ECHR have protected British people from abuse of power by their own government on occasions.. And they've protected people all over the council of Europe (46 member states with a population of approximately 675 million)" "There are currently interim measures against Putin's Russia to protect Ukrainian prisoners of war from being executed" Robert Jenrick, "Why won't you trust British judges?" Shami Chakrabarti, "British judges have no jurisdiction in Ukraine and Russia"

Farrukh

821,508 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The 1995 Constitution of Uganda recognizes the dignity of every human being. Article 24 guarantees freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, while Article 44 makes this right non-derogable, meaning it cannot be suspended or limited under any circumstances. -Mugisa Robert, Human Rights Lawyer and Advocate #EndTorture Refugee Law Project Uganda Human Rights Commission (UHRC)
1:00

The 1995 Constitution of Uganda recognizes the dignity of every human being. Article 24 guarantees freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, while Article 44 makes this right non-derogable, meaning it cannot be suspended or limited under any circumstances. -Mugisa Robert, Human Rights Lawyer and Advocate #EndTorture Refugee Law Project Uganda Human Rights Commission (UHRC)

NTV UGANDA

19,497 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Jazz's CEO has publicly come out in support of an unconstitutional bill. This is not merely a matter of the bill's wording or drafting, it is a question of fundamental human rights guaranteed under Articles 23 and 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan. Aamir Hafeez Ibrahim's demands should not be accommodated if they are inconsistent with the Constitution. No individual's or company's preferences can override constitutional protections. Issues such as fiberization and digitization are important and should certainly be addressed, but they must be resolved within the framework of the Constitution and the law, not by curtailing citizens' fundamental rights.
2:55

Jazz's CEO has publicly come out in support of an unconstitutional bill. This is not merely a matter of the bill's wording or drafting, it is a question of fundamental human rights guaranteed under Articles 23 and 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan. Aamir Hafeez Ibrahim's demands should not be accommodated if they are inconsistent with the Constitution. No individual's or company's preferences can override constitutional protections. Issues such as fiberization and digitization are important and should certainly be addressed, but they must be resolved within the framework of the Constitution and the law, not by curtailing citizens' fundamental rights.

Waqas Habib Rana

13,336 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Britain’s human rights laws and asylum rules built Londonistan. Abu Hamza preached open jihad from Finsbury Park Mosque for years while collecting benefits. Abu Qatada, bin Laden’s right hand man in Europe, spent two decades blocking deportation under human rights protections. Omar Bakri openly ran al-Muhajiroun, recruiting young British Muslims until he fled and got banned. Article 3 of the European Convention, along with asylum rules, made it nearly impossible to remove anyone who claimed “possible mistreatment” back home, no matter what they were doing in the UK. Radicalization happened in public and got labeled “tolerance”. The July 7 bombs were the bill coming due. 52 people died as the direct cost.
0:40

Britain’s human rights laws and asylum rules built Londonistan. Abu Hamza preached open jihad from Finsbury Park Mosque for years while collecting benefits. Abu Qatada, bin Laden’s right hand man in Europe, spent two decades blocking deportation under human rights protections. Omar Bakri openly ran al-Muhajiroun, recruiting young British Muslims until he fled and got banned. Article 3 of the European Convention, along with asylum rules, made it nearly impossible to remove anyone who claimed “possible mistreatment” back home, no matter what they were doing in the UK. Radicalization happened in public and got labeled “tolerance”. The July 7 bombs were the bill coming due. 52 people died as the direct cost.

Rothmus 🏴

873,553 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

22 years ago, the European Court of Human Rights delivered a landmark ruling that changed the lives of transgender people across the UK forever. On July 11, 2002, the court ruled unanimously in favour of Christine Goodwin, a British trans woman who had faced severe workplace harassment, issues with her National Insurance contributions, and was denied the right to marry in her acquired gender. The Grand Chamber found that the UK's failure to legally recognise trans people's gender violated two fundamental rights under the European Convention on Human Rights. The Goodwin v. United Kingdom judgment became the catalyst for the Gender Recognition Act 2004, which finally granted transgender people in the UK full legal recognition in their acquired gender and the right to obtain new birth certificates. This archival footage captures the moment that reshaped trans rights in Britain.
0:32

22 years ago, the European Court of Human Rights delivered a landmark ruling that changed the lives of transgender people across the UK forever. On July 11, 2002, the court ruled unanimously in favour of Christine Goodwin, a British trans woman who had faced severe workplace harassment, issues with her National Insurance contributions, and was denied the right to marry in her acquired gender. The Grand Chamber found that the UK's failure to legally recognise trans people's gender violated two fundamental rights under the European Convention on Human Rights. The Goodwin v. United Kingdom judgment became the catalyst for the Gender Recognition Act 2004, which finally granted transgender people in the UK full legal recognition in their acquired gender and the right to obtain new birth certificates. This archival footage captures the moment that reshaped trans rights in Britain.

PinkNews

71,523 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🇩🇰🔴Denmark is now forging ahead with deportations with a new law. The left-wing Social Democrat Mette Frederiksen celebrated the move, stating: "They rape girls and women. They are involved in gang crime and drug offenses. Unfortunately, we have not yet been able to deport them. This is primarily due to the interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)." Now, this is set to change. She says Denmark is not waiting for the ECHR anymore. All migrants who have been sentenced to one year or more in prison must return to their home country automatically. There will be no case review.
1:04

🇩🇰🔴Denmark is now forging ahead with deportations with a new law. The left-wing Social Democrat Mette Frederiksen celebrated the move, stating: "They rape girls and women. They are involved in gang crime and drug offenses. Unfortunately, we have not yet been able to deport them. This is primarily due to the interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)." Now, this is set to change. She says Denmark is not waiting for the ECHR anymore. All migrants who have been sentenced to one year or more in prison must return to their home country automatically. There will be no case review.

Remix News & Views

871,744 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

BREAKING: Trump claims he wants to send US Citizens to prisons in El Salvador. This is in violation of the US Constitution. Do Republicans even care? U.S. citizens are guaranteed due process, a fair trial, and protection from cruel and unusual punishment under the Constitution. Forcibly sending a U.S. citizen to a foreign prison—especially one known for human rights abuses—would almost certainly violate their Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment rights.
0:57

BREAKING: Trump claims he wants to send US Citizens to prisons in El Salvador. This is in violation of the US Constitution. Do Republicans even care? U.S. citizens are guaranteed due process, a fair trial, and protection from cruel and unusual punishment under the Constitution. Forcibly sending a U.S. citizen to a foreign prison—especially one known for human rights abuses—would almost certainly violate their Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment rights.

Ed Krassenstein

299,861 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Nadine Dorries, "It's incredible we can't protect our own borders, and we never will be able to do that until we leave the ECHR" "It's the court that prevents us from sending many of these asylum seekers back" Fiona Bruce, "There are a number of countries in the European Union that have reduced the number of asylum seekers coming in while remaining within the ECHR" Nadine Dorries, "Yeah, and the number was dropping when the Rwanda scheme was a viable deterrent" *There’s currently no credible evidence that the Rwanda Asylum Plan (UK-Rwanda scheme) has already caused a drop in asylum seeker arrivals* Fiona Bruce, "The UK courts stopped it, that's why it didn't get off the ground" Nadine Dorries, "This one in one out scheme, we have sent 46 back, France have sent us 23. It isn't working, it's not a deterrent" "The only way this will be controlled if when Labour and the Conservatives are gone and Reform UK take control" "Reform UK is the only party who have a plan to stop asylum seekers coming to our shores" *laughter in the audience* "You may laugh" "Leaving the ECHR is the first part of the plan" "And we may even use the Royal Navy" Stephen Kinnock, "What will leaving the ECHR do to our international relations, will it help or hinder?" Nadine Dorries, "Help or hinder is irrelevant"
3:07

Nadine Dorries, "It's incredible we can't protect our own borders, and we never will be able to do that until we leave the ECHR" "It's the court that prevents us from sending many of these asylum seekers back" Fiona Bruce, "There are a number of countries in the European Union that have reduced the number of asylum seekers coming in while remaining within the ECHR" Nadine Dorries, "Yeah, and the number was dropping when the Rwanda scheme was a viable deterrent" *There’s currently no credible evidence that the Rwanda Asylum Plan (UK-Rwanda scheme) has already caused a drop in asylum seeker arrivals* Fiona Bruce, "The UK courts stopped it, that's why it didn't get off the ground" Nadine Dorries, "This one in one out scheme, we have sent 46 back, France have sent us 23. It isn't working, it's not a deterrent" "The only way this will be controlled if when Labour and the Conservatives are gone and Reform UK take control" "Reform UK is the only party who have a plan to stop asylum seekers coming to our shores" *laughter in the audience* "You may laugh" "Leaving the ECHR is the first part of the plan" "And we may even use the Royal Navy" Stephen Kinnock, "What will leaving the ECHR do to our international relations, will it help or hinder?" Nadine Dorries, "Help or hinder is irrelevant"

Farrukh

99,527 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Britain cannot deport dangerous foreign jihadists because its own laws protect them. This isn’t compassion. It’s national suicide dressed up as morality. Jihadists who have no business being in the UK are shielded by laws that put their “rights” above the safety of British citizens. Deporting them is not “far-right.” It is not a violation of “human rights” of foreigners who have no right to be in the UK. This is basic self-defense. British people should not be forced to live under this threat. To my British followers: Why not change the law? Why does the British government keep tying its own hands while this death cult exploits every loophole?
2:11

Britain cannot deport dangerous foreign jihadists because its own laws protect them. This isn’t compassion. It’s national suicide dressed up as morality. Jihadists who have no business being in the UK are shielded by laws that put their “rights” above the safety of British citizens. Deporting them is not “far-right.” It is not a violation of “human rights” of foreigners who have no right to be in the UK. This is basic self-defense. British people should not be forced to live under this threat. To my British followers: Why not change the law? Why does the British government keep tying its own hands while this death cult exploits every loophole?

Liza Rosen

13,487 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten