Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Oh Chris, ECHR governs human rights, while asylum claims are processed under the 1951 Refugee Convention. Leaving ECHR wouldn't accelerate deportations, it would merely strip British citizens of fundamental rights while creating years of legal chaos #bbcbreakfast #r4today

Sarah Attlee

3,575 subscribers

55,969 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

#bbcbreakfast #r4today

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

"Leaving the ECHR would deny British people hard won rights, free speech, the Hillsborough inquiry and protections for older people." The ECHR is fundamental for all of our rights. Asylum seekers have a right to be treated in a dignified and humane manner.

"Leaving the ECHR would deny British people hard won rights, free speech, the Hillsborough inquiry and protections for older people." The ECHR is fundamental for all of our rights. Asylum seekers have a right to be treated in a dignified and humane manner.

Best for Britain

46,885 views • 9 months ago

“Taking us out of the European Court of Human Rights I think is absolutely fundamental to allow us to take back control of our borders Conservative Kieran Mullan says leaving the ECHR is a “genuine, concrete plan” to overhaul the asylum system #bbcqt

“Taking us out of the European Court of Human Rights I think is absolutely fundamental to allow us to take back control of our borders Conservative Kieran Mullan says leaving the ECHR is a “genuine, concrete plan” to overhaul the asylum system #bbcqt

BBC Question Time

41,754 views • 8 months ago

C4News, "Should we abandon the European Convention on Human Rights, something we played a big part in setting up?" Conservative Councillor Paul Mason, "I think we should.. I'd like to add: Australia, Canada and New Zealand are not in the ECHR" *Countries outside of Europe are not in a European convention🤷‍♂️* Lord Dubs, "The ECHR was started by Churchill.. He said the sort of country we are needs to protect our rights.. That is a British tradition.. Are we going to turn our backs on that?" "Yes, the world has moved on but the basic principles of protecting vulnerable people is still there" "I fly the British flag with pride. I think this is a wonderful country. And our contribution to human rights has been first class" Alf Dubs then asks what difference leaving the ECHR would make to addressing asylum seekers on small boats Conservative Councillor Paul Mason waffles

C4News, "Should we abandon the European Convention on Human Rights, something we played a big part in setting up?" Conservative Councillor Paul Mason, "I think we should.. I'd like to add: Australia, Canada and New Zealand are not in the ECHR" Countries outside of Europe are not in a European convention🤷‍♂️ Lord Dubs, "The ECHR was started by Churchill.. He said the sort of country we are needs to protect our rights.. That is a British tradition.. Are we going to turn our backs on that?" "Yes, the world has moved on but the basic principles of protecting vulnerable people is still there" "I fly the British flag with pride. I think this is a wonderful country. And our contribution to human rights has been first class" Alf Dubs then asks what difference leaving the ECHR would make to addressing asylum seekers on small boats Conservative Councillor Paul Mason waffles

Farrukh

105,766 views • 11 months ago

7 Turkish citizens living under the protection of the United Nations in Nairobi/Kenya were kidnapped by unidentified persons. While 3 of these people were released later, it is not yet clear what happened to the other 4 people 😔 UN Human Rights Commissioner for Human Rights Amnesty International Human Rights Watch UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

7 Turkish citizens living under the protection of the United Nations in Nairobi/Kenya were kidnapped by unidentified persons. While 3 of these people were released later, it is not yet clear what happened to the other 4 people 😔 UN Human Rights Commissioner for Human Rights Amnesty International Human Rights Watch UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

erdem gençay

18,678 views • 1 year ago

In 2022 Tory leadership hopeful Tom Tugendhat categorically ruled out leaving the ECHR Today he’s running around suggesting he would be willing to put the UK in the company of Russia & Belarus as the only European countries outside the human rights convention Watch in disbelief

In 2022 Tory leadership hopeful Tom Tugendhat categorically ruled out leaving the ECHR Today he’s running around suggesting he would be willing to put the UK in the company of Russia & Belarus as the only European countries outside the human rights convention Watch in disbelief

Peter Stefanovic

284,074 views • 2 years ago

Britain’s borders are utterly broken. As I say on GB News, we need to: Leave the ECHR Repeal Blair’s Human Rights Act Detain and deport End welfare/social housing for non-British citizens And put British people first All set out in Suicide of a Nation

Britain’s borders are utterly broken. As I say on GB News, we need to: Leave the ECHR Repeal Blair’s Human Rights Act Detain and deport End welfare/social housing for non-British citizens And put British people first All set out in Suicide of a Nation

Matt Goodwin

43,720 views • 4 months ago

'The country is a tinderbox, people are sick and tired of this!' Zia says illegal migration has surged 35% under Keir Starmer, and claims the UK must leave the ECHR, repeal the Human Rights Act, and detain all illegal migrants to restore control.

'The country is a tinderbox, people are sick and tired of this!' Zia says illegal migration has surged 35% under Keir Starmer, and claims the UK must leave the ECHR, repeal the Human Rights Act, and detain all illegal migrants to restore control.

GB News

61,494 views • 11 months ago

Afghan migrants secretly flown in by our government are now suing for £1 billion, while British pensioners freeze, and veterans sleep on the streets. The European Convention of Human Rights now governs who we house, who we fund, and who we prioritise. It’s not just foreign migrants being flown in, it’s your rights being flown out.

Afghan migrants secretly flown in by our government are now suing for £1 billion, while British pensioners freeze, and veterans sleep on the streets. The European Convention of Human Rights now governs who we house, who we fund, and who we prioritise. It’s not just foreign migrants being flown in, it’s your rights being flown out.

Advance UK

44,779 views • 1 year ago

$We are fast transforming from a cohesive United Kingdom into a fractious (dis-)United Nations Without urgent action the British people will soon be little more than silent witnesses to the long and not-so-slow death of the most remarkable nation of the past 1,000 years The time has come to follow the Swedish government's example and encourage & incentivize legal immigrants to either return to their country of origin or leave for a 3rd nation. This must be accompanied by a separate policy of mass deportations of illegal migrants. Astonishingly, between 1 in 50 and 1 in 100 people in the UK are illegal migrants. If implementing this policy means leaving the ECHR, so be it. The ECHR is no longer the institution we helped set up. We certainly do not need the ECHR to protect fundamental rights, most of which were already protected in Britain long before the creation of the ECHR. To all those who say: "Only Belarus and Russia are not in the ECHR, do we really want to join their ranks?", my response is: Canada, Australia and New Zealand are also not in the ECHR and no one would accuse them of disregarding fundamental rights & freedoms. Over the past quarter of a century, Labour & the Tories have wrought upon this land the greatest act of harm in our long island story. Neither party is fit to govern - and they certainly aren't courageous enough to take the urgent action we so desperately require. I joined Mike Graham 🇬🇧 on Talk to discuss:👇$

We are fast transforming from a cohesive United Kingdom into a fractious (dis-)United Nations Without urgent action the British people will soon be little more than silent witnesses to the long and not-so-slow death of the most remarkable nation of the past 1,000 years The time has come to follow the Swedish government's example and encourage & incentivize legal immigrants to either return to their country of origin or leave for a 3rd nation. This must be accompanied by a separate policy of mass deportations of illegal migrants. Astonishingly, between 1 in 50 and 1 in 100 people in the UK are illegal migrants. If implementing this policy means leaving the ECHR, so be it. The ECHR is no longer the institution we helped set up. We certainly do not need the ECHR to protect fundamental rights, most of which were already protected in Britain long before the creation of the ECHR. To all those who say: "Only Belarus and Russia are not in the ECHR, do we really want to join their ranks?", my response is: Canada, Australia and New Zealand are also not in the ECHR and no one would accuse them of disregarding fundamental rights & freedoms. Over the past quarter of a century, Labour & the Tories have wrought upon this land the greatest act of harm in our long island story. Neither party is fit to govern - and they certainly aren't courageous enough to take the urgent action we so desperately require. I joined Mike Graham 🇬🇧 on Talk to discuss:👇

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

46,550 views • 1 year ago

Liberals in Europe are using an old treaty as a loophole to block illegal migrant pedophiles from being deported They then installed activist judges in the UK to uphold it “I couldn't deport foreign pedophiles. I couldn't deport foreign terrorists because they would rely on the European Convention of Human Rights, and their human rights were more important than your human rights or the human rights of the law-abiding majority.” “A lot of illegal migrants rely on the European Convention of Human Rights in court combined with our very litigious legal ecosystem with activist judges in the UK and in the Strasbourg Court which adjudicates the European Convention of Human Rights. We have no chance in deporting illegal migrants at any effective scale.”

Liberals in Europe are using an old treaty as a loophole to block illegal migrant pedophiles from being deported They then installed activist judges in the UK to uphold it “I couldn't deport foreign pedophiles. I couldn't deport foreign terrorists because they would rely on the European Convention of Human Rights, and their human rights were more important than your human rights or the human rights of the law-abiding majority.” “A lot of illegal migrants rely on the European Convention of Human Rights in court combined with our very litigious legal ecosystem with activist judges in the UK and in the Strasbourg Court which adjudicates the European Convention of Human Rights. We have no chance in deporting illegal migrants at any effective scale.”

Wall Street Apes

35,404 views • 11 months ago

Robert Jenrick, "I do actually supporting leaving the European Convention of Human Rights" Shami Chakrabarti, "The ECHR have protected British people from abuse of power by their own government on occasions.. And they've protected people all over the council of Europe (46 member states with a population of approximately 675 million)" "There are currently interim measures against Putin's Russia to protect Ukrainian prisoners of war from being executed" Robert Jenrick, "Why won't you trust British judges?" Shami Chakrabarti, "British judges have no jurisdiction in Ukraine and Russia"

Robert Jenrick, "I do actually supporting leaving the European Convention of Human Rights" Shami Chakrabarti, "The ECHR have protected British people from abuse of power by their own government on occasions.. And they've protected people all over the council of Europe (46 member states with a population of approximately 675 million)" "There are currently interim measures against Putin's Russia to protect Ukrainian prisoners of war from being executed" Robert Jenrick, "Why won't you trust British judges?" Shami Chakrabarti, "British judges have no jurisdiction in Ukraine and Russia"

Farrukh

821,508 views • 2 years ago

Jazz's CEO has publicly come out in support of an unconstitutional bill. This is not merely a matter of the bill's wording or drafting, it is a question of fundamental human rights guaranteed under Articles 23 and 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan. Aamir Hafeez Ibrahim's demands should not be accommodated if they are inconsistent with the Constitution. No individual's or company's preferences can override constitutional protections. Issues such as fiberization and digitization are important and should certainly be addressed, but they must be resolved within the framework of the Constitution and the law, not by curtailing citizens' fundamental rights.

Jazz's CEO has publicly come out in support of an unconstitutional bill. This is not merely a matter of the bill's wording or drafting, it is a question of fundamental human rights guaranteed under Articles 23 and 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan. Aamir Hafeez Ibrahim's demands should not be accommodated if they are inconsistent with the Constitution. No individual's or company's preferences can override constitutional protections. Issues such as fiberization and digitization are important and should certainly be addressed, but they must be resolved within the framework of the Constitution and the law, not by curtailing citizens' fundamental rights.

Waqas Habib Rana

13,336 views • 1 month ago

22 years ago, the European Court of Human Rights delivered a landmark ruling that changed the lives of transgender people across the UK forever. On July 11, 2002, the court ruled unanimously in favour of Christine Goodwin, a British trans woman who had faced severe workplace harassment, issues with her National Insurance contributions, and was denied the right to marry in her acquired gender. The Grand Chamber found that the UK's failure to legally recognise trans people's gender violated two fundamental rights under the European Convention on Human Rights. The Goodwin v. United Kingdom judgment became the catalyst for the Gender Recognition Act 2004, which finally granted transgender people in the UK full legal recognition in their acquired gender and the right to obtain new birth certificates. This archival footage captures the moment that reshaped trans rights in Britain.

22 years ago, the European Court of Human Rights delivered a landmark ruling that changed the lives of transgender people across the UK forever. On July 11, 2002, the court ruled unanimously in favour of Christine Goodwin, a British trans woman who had faced severe workplace harassment, issues with her National Insurance contributions, and was denied the right to marry in her acquired gender. The Grand Chamber found that the UK's failure to legally recognise trans people's gender violated two fundamental rights under the European Convention on Human Rights. The Goodwin v. United Kingdom judgment became the catalyst for the Gender Recognition Act 2004, which finally granted transgender people in the UK full legal recognition in their acquired gender and the right to obtain new birth certificates. This archival footage captures the moment that reshaped trans rights in Britain.

PinkNews

71,232 views • 2 months ago

BREAKING: Trump claims he wants to send US Citizens to prisons in El Salvador. This is in violation of the US Constitution. Do Republicans even care? U.S. citizens are guaranteed due process, a fair trial, and protection from cruel and unusual punishment under the Constitution. Forcibly sending a U.S. citizen to a foreign prison—especially one known for human rights abuses—would almost certainly violate their Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment rights.

BREAKING: Trump claims he wants to send US Citizens to prisons in El Salvador. This is in violation of the US Constitution. Do Republicans even care? U.S. citizens are guaranteed due process, a fair trial, and protection from cruel and unusual punishment under the Constitution. Forcibly sending a U.S. citizen to a foreign prison—especially one known for human rights abuses—would almost certainly violate their Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment rights.

Ed Krassenstein

299,851 views • 1 year ago

Nadine Dorries, "It's incredible we can't protect our own borders, and we never will be able to do that until we leave the ECHR" "It's the court that prevents us from sending many of these asylum seekers back" Fiona Bruce, "There are a number of countries in the European Union that have reduced the number of asylum seekers coming in while remaining within the ECHR" Nadine Dorries, "Yeah, and the number was dropping when the Rwanda scheme was a viable deterrent" *There’s currently no credible evidence that the Rwanda Asylum Plan (UK-Rwanda scheme) has already caused a drop in asylum seeker arrivals* Fiona Bruce, "The UK courts stopped it, that's why it didn't get off the ground" Nadine Dorries, "This one in one out scheme, we have sent 46 back, France have sent us 23. It isn't working, it's not a deterrent" "The only way this will be controlled if when Labour and the Conservatives are gone and Reform UK take control" "Reform UK is the only party who have a plan to stop asylum seekers coming to our shores" *laughter in the audience* "You may laugh" "Leaving the ECHR is the first part of the plan" "And we may even use the Royal Navy" Stephen Kinnock, "What will leaving the ECHR do to our international relations, will it help or hinder?" Nadine Dorries, "Help or hinder is irrelevant"

Nadine Dorries, "It's incredible we can't protect our own borders, and we never will be able to do that until we leave the ECHR" "It's the court that prevents us from sending many of these asylum seekers back" Fiona Bruce, "There are a number of countries in the European Union that have reduced the number of asylum seekers coming in while remaining within the ECHR" Nadine Dorries, "Yeah, and the number was dropping when the Rwanda scheme was a viable deterrent" There’s currently no credible evidence that the Rwanda Asylum Plan (UK-Rwanda scheme) has already caused a drop in asylum seeker arrivals Fiona Bruce, "The UK courts stopped it, that's why it didn't get off the ground" Nadine Dorries, "This one in one out scheme, we have sent 46 back, France have sent us 23. It isn't working, it's not a deterrent" "The only way this will be controlled if when Labour and the Conservatives are gone and Reform UK take control" "Reform UK is the only party who have a plan to stop asylum seekers coming to our shores" laughter in the audience "You may laugh" "Leaving the ECHR is the first part of the plan" "And we may even use the Royal Navy" Stephen Kinnock, "What will leaving the ECHR do to our international relations, will it help or hinder?" Nadine Dorries, "Help or hinder is irrelevant"

Farrukh

99,527 views • 9 months ago

🇩🇰🔴Denmark is now forging ahead with deportations with a new law. The left-wing Social Democrat Mette Frederiksen celebrated the move, stating: "They rape girls and women. They are involved in gang crime and drug offenses. Unfortunately, we have not yet been able to deport them. This is primarily due to the interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)." Now, this is set to change. She says Denmark is not waiting for the ECHR anymore. All migrants who have been sentenced to one year or more in prison must return to their home country automatically. There will be no case review.

🇩🇰🔴Denmark is now forging ahead with deportations with a new law. The left-wing Social Democrat Mette Frederiksen celebrated the move, stating: "They rape girls and women. They are involved in gang crime and drug offenses. Unfortunately, we have not yet been able to deport them. This is primarily due to the interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)." Now, this is set to change. She says Denmark is not waiting for the ECHR anymore. All migrants who have been sentenced to one year or more in prison must return to their home country automatically. There will be no case review.

Remix News & Views

871,234 views • 3 months ago

Britain cannot deport dangerous foreign jihadists because its own laws protect them. This isn’t compassion. It’s national suicide dressed up as morality. Jihadists who have no business being in the UK are shielded by laws that put their “rights” above the safety of British citizens. Deporting them is not “far-right.” It is not a violation of “human rights” of foreigners who have no right to be in the UK. This is basic self-defense. British people should not be forced to live under this threat. To my British followers: Why not change the law? Why does the British government keep tying its own hands while this death cult exploits every loophole?

Britain cannot deport dangerous foreign jihadists because its own laws protect them. This isn’t compassion. It’s national suicide dressed up as morality. Jihadists who have no business being in the UK are shielded by laws that put their “rights” above the safety of British citizens. Deporting them is not “far-right.” It is not a violation of “human rights” of foreigners who have no right to be in the UK. This is basic self-defense. British people should not be forced to live under this threat. To my British followers: Why not change the law? Why does the British government keep tying its own hands while this death cult exploits every loophole?

Liza Rosen

13,487 views • 1 month ago

Iraq is officially legalizing the marriage of 9-year-old girls. This is not merely a policy shift; it is state-sponsored institutionalization of pedophilia under the guise of 7th-century religious tradition. A brave Iraqi activist risked her life to confront the imam behind the bill, reminding him that Muhammad’s actions 1,400 years ago have no place in a civilized modern society. She was immediately silenced by a mob insisting that religious dogma is beyond criticism. When the age of consent is lowered to childhood, human rights have officially been erased. Why are Western feminists and human rights groups so silent while this barbarism is codified into law?

Iraq is officially legalizing the marriage of 9-year-old girls. This is not merely a policy shift; it is state-sponsored institutionalization of pedophilia under the guise of 7th-century religious tradition. A brave Iraqi activist risked her life to confront the imam behind the bill, reminding him that Muhammad’s actions 1,400 years ago have no place in a civilized modern society. She was immediately silenced by a mob insisting that religious dogma is beyond criticism. When the age of consent is lowered to childhood, human rights have officially been erased. Why are Western feminists and human rights groups so silent while this barbarism is codified into law?

Yossi BenYakar

92,897 views • 5 months ago

Must watch on leaving the ECHR #BBCQT Lady in glasses, "Are you really considering leaving the ECHR to push forward the Rwanda policy which is inhumane" *Huge clap from the audience while the camera shows Rishi Sunak looks like a rabbbit in headlights* Rishi Sunak, "15 other European countries signed a statement about asylum seekers.. You have your view.. I disagree" Fiona Bruce, "Will you leave the ECHR?" Rishi Sunak, "I disagree with you. 15 other European countries signed the statement and agree with me" Lady in glasses, "Didn't the UK Supreme Court call it unlawful?" Rishi Sunak, "We passed a new piece of legislation.. If a foreign court including the ECHR forces me to chose between our security and a foriegn court, I chose our security every single time" *audience shout out shame* Fiona Bruce, "When you say it's a foreign court.. Great Britain set it up and we have a UK judge on the ECHR" Rishi Sunak, "Yes, but it is in Strasbourg.. It's not a British court" Fiona Bruce, "We were instrumental in setting it up" Rishi Sunak waffles then looks away to another question Fiona Bruce asks the questioner what she said Lady in glasses, "I asked if he's considering leaving the ECHR.. Rishi Sunak is putting words in my mouth" Arrogant, entitled, populist, drivel from Prime Minister Rishi Sunak

Must watch on leaving the ECHR #BBCQT Lady in glasses, "Are you really considering leaving the ECHR to push forward the Rwanda policy which is inhumane" Huge clap from the audience while the camera shows Rishi Sunak looks like a rabbbit in headlights Rishi Sunak, "15 other European countries signed a statement about asylum seekers.. You have your view.. I disagree" Fiona Bruce, "Will you leave the ECHR?" Rishi Sunak, "I disagree with you. 15 other European countries signed the statement and agree with me" Lady in glasses, "Didn't the UK Supreme Court call it unlawful?" Rishi Sunak, "We passed a new piece of legislation.. If a foreign court including the ECHR forces me to chose between our security and a foriegn court, I chose our security every single time" audience shout out shame Fiona Bruce, "When you say it's a foreign court.. Great Britain set it up and we have a UK judge on the ECHR" Rishi Sunak, "Yes, but it is in Strasbourg.. It's not a British court" Fiona Bruce, "We were instrumental in setting it up" Rishi Sunak waffles then looks away to another question Fiona Bruce asks the questioner what she said Lady in glasses, "I asked if he's considering leaving the ECHR.. Rishi Sunak is putting words in my mouth" Arrogant, entitled, populist, drivel from Prime Minister Rishi Sunak

Farrukh

1,011,727 views • 2 years ago