正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Oh, this scene from Exodus is so moving partly because it remains so relevant. Made in 1960, set in the 1948 war, it’s about the establishment of the state of Israel. We meet Holocaust survivors imprisoned in Cyprus by Brits, the rows between the Jewish groups over how to...

20,040 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

"Ongoing" - One of the phrases increasingly used next to the term "Nakba" is "Ongoing" as in the recent proposal by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib. Now westerners assume that the "ongoing" seeks to highlight continued suffering of Palestinian Arabs, but as with so many other phrases that serve as "dual use language" (as Eran Shayshon coined) is that the deep meaning is very different. Once it is known and understood that the real time meaning of the Nakba, as described by Constantin Zureiq as "Seven Arab states declare war in an attempt to subdue Zionism, stop impotent before it, and return on their heels" was the shameful failure to defeat the lowly Jews in war - it becomes crystal clear why it remains "ongoing": As long as Israel exists, the Arab, and especially Palestinian Arab shameful failure to dismantle Jewish sovereignty and "subdue Zionism" remains "ongoing". As long as, per Bevin's quote, the top goal of the Palestine Arabs "to resist to the last the establishment of Jewish sovereignty in any part of the land" remains unfulfilled, their definition of disaster remains "ongoing". In the updated book of The War of Return, "October Return", Dr. Adi Schwartz and I included a dictionary of sort to explore this dual use language. I share it here with you: "This becomes especially clear when analyzing the language of Palestinian identity and that of its supporters around the world. Terms such as “two states,” “justice,” “return,” and “rights” carry one meaning in dialogue between Palestinians and Westerners or Israelis—but an entirely different meaning within internal Palestinian discourse. "Take “two states,” for example. During the years of negotiations, Palestinian leaders—and many surveys—expressed support for the “two-state solution.” Israelis and Westerners reasonably assumed that this meant one state for Palestinian Arabs and one for Jews. In retrospect, we should have checked. For when Palestinians speak of “two states,” they also maintain that millions of Palestinian “refugees” have a right to settle inside Israel. The implication is that the phrase “two states” actually means a Palestinian Arab state in the West Bank and Gaza, alongside a second Arab-majority state that replaces Israel via the mass return of refugees. In effect: “this one is ours, and that one is also ours.” "To this day, no official Palestinian peace plan includes the recognition of a Jewish state on any part of the land between the river and the sea. "It is also worth examining the meaning of a word like “justice”—so frequently invoked in phrases like “a just peace,” “a just solution,” or in the names of organizations such as “Students for Justice in Palestine.” To many in the world, “justice” may simply mean that Palestinians should have a state of their own, or that Israel should not control their daily lives. That is a reasonable interpretation. But it is not the Palestinian one. "For Palestinians, there is only one concept of justice: the reversal of the injustice they associate with the creation of the State of Israel. And central to that “corrective justice” is return—which, by definition, entails the end of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people. "The same applies to words like “rights,” “liberation,” and, of course, “return.” As will become clear in the pages ahead, there is no ambiguity: “return” is the concept that embodies victory over the Jewish state and its elimination. "That is why the butcherty of October 7 was greeted with euphoria."

ד״ר עינת וילף Dr. Einat Wilf

83,590 次观看 • 3 个月前

Very few people take the time to actually research the history of Israel, yet they are quick to make claims such as "the Jewish people stole the land." For these people, here is a history lesson and an attached video: Late 19th and Early 20th Century: The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw increased legal Jewish immigration to the region referred to by many as Palestine, which was then land that was part of the Ottoman Empire. This immigration was driven by various factors, including the desire for a Jewish homeland. The Jewish people who immigrated legally obtained the land through various means, including: Via purchase, via donations from Jewish philanthropists, via land reclamation of uncultivated land, through agricultural communities (known as Kibbutzim), or through obtaining public lan. Many Jewish people already owned land within the Ottoman Empire when it collapsed. World War I: During World War I, in 1917, the British Empire and Allied forces captured Palestine from the Ottoman Empire in 1917. Balfour Declaration (1917): In 1917, the British government, who had captured the land, issued the Balfour Declaration, that showed support for the creation of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine. British Mandate (1920-1948): After World War I, the League of Nations granted Britain a mandate over Palestine. During this period, legal Jewish immigration to Palestine increased even more. 1947 UN Partition Plan: In 1947, after tensions began rising between Arabs and Jews in the region, the United Nations proposed a plan to partition Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states. The plan was accepted by Jewish leaders but rejected by Arab leaders. 1948 Arab-Israeli War: The end of the British Mandate for Palestine in 1948 marked the declaration of the State of Israel. The neighboring Arab states initiated a military conflict with Israel, resulting in the displacement of many Palestinians from their homes. It was the Arab states, not Israel that launched this war, after the land was divided up. The 1948 Arab-Israeli War, known as the Nakba, led to the displacement and expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinian Arabs from their land. Many became refugees, and some sought refuge in neighboring Arab countries. Resulting Borders: The war's outcome, including armistice agreements in 1949, resulted in new borders and territories. Israel controlled a larger portion of Palestine than had been proposed in the UN partition plan after they obtain much of this land in the War that was started by the Arabs. Subsequent Conflicts and Developments: Over the years, additional conflicts and wars, such as the Six-Day War in 1967, led to further territorial changes and disputes between Israel and its neighbors. Additionally, here are parts of a video created by Francisco Gil-White, an anthropologist.

Ed Krassenstein

2,459,212 次观看 • 2 年前

‘Israel’s war on the Palestinians and Arabs is NO LONGER A JUST WAR, it will bring about the end of Zionism.’ —Former Chief of Israel’s Shin Bet Admiral Ami Ayalon ‘Our war with the Arabs and the Palestinians started since the beginning of the Zionism, at the end of the 19th century. What I claim is that we won this war. We won this war because in Beirut in 2002, all the Arab League members, they met and they reverse the three no’s of Khartoum, as a result of the Israeli victory in the Six Day War, they met in Khartoum and they come to decide on three no’s: No to recognition, no to negotiation, and no to peace with Israel. It took several years and in 2002 they met again in Beirut and they understand that what they're facing is a new region, new Middle East, a new reality. And they reverse and they decide on the three yes: yes to recognition, yes to conversation and negotiation, and yes to peace with Israel, on the conditions, on the parameters of the UN Security Council resolutions. This is a major victory and we refuse to see our victory...since they accepted our presence, our right to declare a Jewish state in the Middle East, what I claim is that since this moment our war is not a just war anymore. Because what we are fighting for, and we do not understand in Israel, is in order to expand our eastern border, to deny the creation of a Palestinian state and the Palestinian right to self-determination…this is the end of the Zionist dream. Because if we are not majority in our state, we do not have the power and we do not have the right to dictate the culture, the language, the symbols, the way we celebrate our holidays. So in a way we are fighting without understanding that this war will bring the end of Zionist concept.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

65,335 次观看 • 1 个月前

I ask for everyone to watch this, absorb this, and share it. This is THE most important and truthful speech ever given by any human being in the history of the Middle East. Listen to every single word Golda Meir says. Because this is the answer that destroys every ounce of propaganda ever told against Israel. If we are told by the entire world to give to the Arab people the land prior to the war of 1967 because it’s so important, then why was there a war in 1967??? Arabs already controlled the land prior to 1967. Neither Egypt nor Syria nor Jordan gave this land to the “Palestinians”. Nope. They attacked Israel to wipe us out because it’s never been about the land they had, but it’s because of the land we have. They want all of it. They want ethnic cleansing. They want genocide. That’s the truth. The reality is that nobody is willing to repatriate the Arabs because it will cause a world war. So instead, the world believes it’s easier to sacrifice 10 million Israeli lives to appease the Arabs. And I and every other genuine Israeli (not these leftist freaks who hate Israel from the inside) are saying loudly and clearly, that we will never allow our people to be sacrificed again. We will defend our land and our people to the death. And however many of our enemies need to die so that we are not exterminated by them, so be it. They are the warmongers. They are the ones starting wars. They are the murderers. And we will crush them all!!!

Mor Edge Insight

355,785 次观看 • 1 年前

I was asked by USA Today to respond to remarks made by Hasan Piker about Zionism. Piker claimed as follows: “Zionism is the ethnoreligious supremacist ideology that is exterminationist in principle, born out of the wrong assessment that this was a land without people for a people without land. It required the extermination of the indigenous population, and that's precisely what has happened since its inception. And its final iteration of that has been the Gaza genocide that we watched unfold.” You can call a blowtorch an avocado as many times as you want, but it still doesn’t have a seed, and it still isn’t green because it’s still just a blowtorch. The claim that Zionism is an exterminationist ideology is just as nonsensical as calling a blowtorch an avocado. The suggestion that Jews want to exterminate the Arabs who also live on the land is likewise, as it has always been, ludicrous and false. Zionism is a simple idea, which is that Jews have the same rights — not more rights, but also not fewer rights — than every other people on Earth have to sovereignty in their national homeland. So just as you might think that Bulgarians have the right to sovereignty in their homeland, Japanese people, Korean people, German people all have the right to sovereignty in their homeland, Zionism is just the idea that Jews should be treated the same. By the way, this is in the charter, the charter that is the foundation of the state of Israel. In that document, the word ‘extermination,’ of course, would never appear there, but anything that even remotely resembles that word or idea is foreign to any of the early laws or that document. In fact, the document says precisely the opposite. The document says that one of the purposes of the state of Israel is to allow Jews and Arabs alike to live in peace and to flourish together in the land of Israel. That's what the Declaration of Independence of the State of Israel says, and by the way, that's what the state of Israel has proven, more so than what it said in 1948, in the decades since.

Roy K. Altman

20,582 次观看 • 1 个月前

*** An Open Letter To The World *** Dear World, I understand that you are upset with us here in Israel. Indeed, it appears that you are quite upset, even angry. Indeed, every few years, you seem to become upset by us. Today it’s Lebanon, yesterday it was the brutal repression of the Palestinians, before that it was the bombing of the nuclear reactor in Baghdad, the Yom Kippur War, and the Sinai Campaign. It appears that Jews who triumph — and who therefore live — upset you most extraordinarily. Of course, dear world, long before there was an Israel, we, the Jewish people, upset you. We upset the German people who elected Hitler and upset the Austrian people who cheered his entry into Vienna. We upset a whole slew of Slavic nations: Poles, Slovaks, Lithuanians, Ukrainians, Russians, Hungarians, and Romanians. And we go back a long way in the history of world upset. We upset the Cossacks who massacred tens of thousands of us in 1648–1649. We upset the Crusaders who, on their way to liberate the Holy Land, were so upset at Jews that they slaughtered untold numbers of us for centuries. We have upset the Roman Catholic Church that did its best to define our relationship through inquisitions. And we have upset the arch-enemy of the Church, Martin Luther, who in his call to burn the synagogues and the Jews within them showed an admirable Christian ecumenical spirit. And it is because we became so upset over upsetting you, dear world, that we decided to leave you — in a manner of speaking — and establish a Jewish state. The reasoning was that living in close contact with you as resident strangers in the various countries that comprise you, we upset you, irritate you, and disturb you. What better notion than to leave you and thus to love you and have you love us? And so we decided to come home — home to the same land we were driven out of 1,900 years earlier by a Roman world that apparently we also upset. Alas, dear world, it appears that you are hard to please. Having left you in your pilgrimages and inquisitions and crusades and Holocaust — having taken our leave of the general world to live alone in our own little state — we continue to upset you. You are upset that we repress the poor Palestinians. You are deeply angered over the fact that we do not give up the lands of 1967, which are clearly the obstacle to peace in the Middle East. Moscow is upset and Washington is upset. The radical Muslims are upset and the gentle Egyptian moderates are upset. Well, dear world, consider the reaction of a normal Jew from Israel: In 1920, in 1921, and 1929 there were no territories of 1967 to impede peace between Jews and Arabs. Indeed, there was no Jewish state to upset anybody. Nevertheless, the same oppressed and repressed Palestinians slaughtered tens of Jews in Jerusalem, Jaffa, Safed, and Hebron. Indeed, 67 Jews were slaughtered in one day in Hebron in 1929. Dear world — why did the Arabs, the Palestinians, massacre 67 Jews in one day in 1929? Could it have been their anger over Israeli “aggression” in 1967? And why were 510 Jewish men, women, and children slaughtered in Arab riots between 1936 and 1939? Was it because Arabs were upset over 1967? And when you, dear world, proposed a UN partition plan in 1947 that would have created a “Palestinian” state alongside a tiny Israel, and the Arabs cried “No!” and went to war and killed 6,000 Jews — was that upset caused by the “aggression” of 1967? And by the way, dear world, why did we not hear your cry of upset then? The poor Palestinians who today kill Jews with explosives and firebombs and stones are part of the same people who, when they had all the territories they now demand be given to them for their state, attempted to drive the Jewish state into the sea. The same twisted faces, the same hate, the same cry of “Itbah al-Yahud!” — “Slaughter the Jew!” — that we hear and see today were seen and heard then by the same people. The same dream: destroy Israel. What they failed to do yesterday, they dream of today, but we should not repress them. Dear world — you stood by during the Holocaust, and you stood by in 1948 as seven states launched a war that the Arab League proudly compared to the Mongol massacres. You stood by in 1967 as Nasser, wildly cheered by wild mobs in every Arab capital in the world, vowed to drive the Jews into the sea — and you would stand by tomorrow if Israel were facing extinction. And since we know that the Arabs dream daily of that extinction, we will do everything possible to remain alive in our own land. If that bothers you, dear world — well, think of how many times in the past you bothered us. In any event, dear world — If you are bothered by us, here is one Jew in Israel who could not care less.

George Orwell

14,249 次观看 • 2 个月前

*** An Open Letter To The World *** Dear World, I understand that you are upset with us here in Israel. Indeed, it appears that you are quite upset, even angry. Indeed, every few years, you seem to become upset by us. Today it’s Lebanon, yesterday it was the brutal repression of the Palestinians, before that it was the bombing of the nuclear reactor in Baghdad, the Yom Kippur War, and the Sinai Campaign. It appears that Jews who triumph — and who therefore live — upset you most extraordinarily. Of course, dear world, long before there was an Israel, we, the Jewish people, upset you. We upset the German people who elected Hitler and upset the Austrian people who cheered his entry into Vienna. We upset a whole slew of Slavic nations: Poles, Slovaks, Lithuanians, Ukrainians, Russians, Hungarians, and Romanians. And we go back a long way in the history of world upset. We upset the Cossacks who massacred tens of thousands of us in 1648–1649. We upset the Crusaders who, on their way to liberate the Holy Land, were so upset at Jews that they slaughtered untold numbers of us for centuries. We have upset the Roman Catholic Church that did its best to define our relationship through inquisitions. And we have upset the arch-enemy of the Church, Martin Luther, who in his call to burn the synagogues and the Jews within them showed an admirable Christian ecumenical spirit. And it is because we became so upset over upsetting you, dear world, that we decided to leave you — in a manner of speaking — and establish a Jewish state. The reasoning was that living in close contact with you as resident strangers in the various countries that comprise you, we upset you, irritate you, and disturb you. What better notion than to leave you and thus to love you and have you love us? And so we decided to come home — home to the same land we were driven out of 1,900 years earlier by a Roman world that apparently we also upset. Alas, dear world, it appears that you are hard to please. Having left you in your pilgrimages and inquisitions and crusades and Holocaust — having taken our leave of the general world to live alone in our own little state — we continue to upset you. You are upset that we repress the poor Palestinians. You are deeply angered over the fact that we do not give up the lands of 1967, which are clearly the obstacle to peace in the Middle East. Moscow is upset and Washington is upset. The radical Muslims are upset and the gentle Egyptian moderates are upset. Well, dear world, consider the reaction of a normal Jew from Israel: In 1920, in 1921, and 1929 there were no territories of 1967 to impede peace between Jews and Arabs. Indeed, there was no Jewish state to upset anybody. Nevertheless, the same oppressed and repressed Palestinians slaughtered tens of Jews in Jerusalem, Jaffa, Safed, and Hebron. Indeed, 67 Jews were slaughtered in one day in Hebron in 1929. Dear world — why did the Arabs, the Palestinians, massacre 67 Jews in one day in 1929? Could it have been their anger over Israeli “aggression” in 1967? And why were 510 Jewish men, women, and children slaughtered in Arab riots between 1936 and 1939? Was it because Arabs were upset over 1967? And when you, dear world, proposed a UN partition plan in 1947 that would have created a “Palestinian” state alongside a tiny Israel, and the Arabs cried “No!” and went to war and killed 6,000 Jews — was that upset caused by the “aggression” of 1967? And by the way, dear world, why did we not hear your cry of upset then? The poor Palestinians who today kill Jews with explosives and firebombs and stones are part of the same people who, when they had all the territories they now demand be given to them for their state, attempted to drive the Jewish state into the sea. The same twisted faces, the same hate, the same cry of “Itbah al-Yahud!” — “Slaughter the Jew!” — that we hear and see today were seen and heard then by the same people. The same dream: destroy Israel. What they failed to do yesterday, they dream of today, but we should not repress them. Dear world — you stood by during the Holocaust, and you stood by in 1948 as seven states launched a war that the Arab League proudly compared to the Mongol massacres. You stood by in 1967 as Nasser, wildly cheered by wild mobs in every Arab capital in the world, vowed to drive the Jews into the sea — and you would stand by tomorrow if Israel were facing extinction. And since we know that the Arabs dream daily of that extinction, we will do everything possible to remain alive in our own land. If that bothers you, dear world — well, think of how many times in the past you bothered us. In any event, dear world — If you are bothered by us, here is one Jew in Israel who could not care less.

George Orwell

20,827 次观看 • 4 个月前

Israel And Its Supporters Are Causing Attacks On Jewish Institutions Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt gave a bizarre appearance on CNN in response to an attempted car bombing of a Michigan synagogue by a man whose Lebanese family members were killed by Israeli forces. “We are seeing Jewish people, the Jewish state, blamed for the war in the Middle East,” Greenblatt said. “That is wrong. It is wrong to scapegoat, it is wrong to hold Jewish people accountable for something you don’t like on the other side of the planet. And we really need leaders on all sides in politics, running for office, podcasters, to stop with the conspiracies, to stop with the accusations, and then tell us ‘but we oppose antisemitism’. You don’t get to say you’re opposed to hate if you’re trafficking in hateful conspiracy theories.” Now, at first glance it this might read like Greenblatt is taking the entirely reasonable position that it is wrong to blame Jewish Americans for the actions of the Israeli government. But take a closer look at his use of the phrase “the Jewish state”. What Greenblatt is actually doing here is claiming it’s an antisemitic conspiracy theory to blame the state of Israel for its war crimes, while simultaneously lumping all Jewish people in with the actions of that state. That’s what he’s doing when he says “Jewish people, the Jewish state” in the same breath while talking about Israeli acts of mass military violence. It’s so obnoxious how genocide apologists like Greenblatt make a living actively telling everyone that Jews and Judaism are inseparable from the acts of the Israeli government, but whenever there’s an extremist attack by someone who doesn’t distinguish between western Jews and the state of Israel it gets blamed on the pro-Palestine left. Pro-Palestine leftists perform endless verbal gymnastics to avoid conflating Jewish people with the state of Israel, while Israel and its supporters conflate them constantly. Yet we’re always the ones who get blamed whenever there’s a terror attack on a Jewish institution by someone enraged by Israel’s actions. Zionists are the ones doing everything they can to make sure people see the state of Israel as synonymous with Jews and Judaism. That is what they are doing every time they claim a criticism of Israel’s actions is hate speech against Jews. They are claiming that the nation and its government are one and the same as the entirety of the Jewish faith and its adherents. Pro-Palestine leftists have been doing the exact opposite. We go to great pains to make sure all our arguments are carefully worded to avoid being interpreted as an attack on the Jewish faith, making it clear that our grievance is with the state of Israel and the political ideology of Zionism which supports that state’s abusive nature. And then Israel apologists come in and smear those meticulously crafted arguments as a hateful attack on all Jews everywhere. Zionists are therefore responsible for the growing perception that our Jewish neighbors and countrymen are culpable for the abuses of the Israeli government. When more attacks on Jewish institutions occur (and they will), it is Israel and its supporters who will hold the blame for this, not the pro-Palestine left. I am not saying attacks on Jewish institutions should happen. I am not saying it will be good when they do happen. I’m saying it will happen, and when it happens it will be a terrible thing. And it will be the fault of Israel and its supporters. We’ve been running around like crazy trying to stop this, falling all over ourselves to thwart the Zionist efforts to conflate Jews with Israel, but our voices aren’t strong enough. We’re not the ones getting loudly amplified by every mass media outlet, they are. It’s not people like me getting invited to appear on CNN to talk to Wolf Blitzer, it’s people like Jonathan Greenblatt. So when we lose the narrative war on this front and the next extremist attack occurs, it won’t be our fault. It will be theirs. It will be the fault of Israel and its apologists. We fought them as hard as we could to prevent this, but they won. And the consequences of this will therefore rest squarely on their shoulders.

Caitlin Johnstone

33,183 次观看 • 5 个月前

In 1948, the armies of 5 Arab Muslim states waged a genocidal war against the fledgling state of Israel. At the same time, the Jews were under an arms embargo by the British who were arming the Arabs and training them. Just prior to waging war against us, the Arab League leadership demanded that all Arabs on our land leave the land “temporarily” so that the Arab armies can sweep in and wipe out every last one of us. Now this isn’t conjecture. This is historical FACT. The majority of Arabs fled the land and waited for the Arab armies to wipe us out. But some Arabs chose to stay and fight alongside us against the invading armies. According to two UN reports, the total number of Arabs who fled the land was between 500,000 and 560,000. This number thrown around of 750,000 or a million is completely fictitious and was claimed once in an article in a Russian magazine. Now at the same time as the Arab armies forced the Arabs off the land, they simultaneously forced almost every single Jew out of every Arab land. The number of Jews forced to flee by force and having to leave all their livelihood and belongings totalled between 750,000 and 850,000. The vast majority fled to Israel, while a few fled to the US. Now unlike the Arabs, the Jews forced off their lands didn’t get a dedicated UN agency to protect them. They arrived in Israel and our country stood together and absorbed every last one. There are no Jewish refugees anymore because we took them all in and they became Israelis. The majority of the population of Israel are not European refugees. They’re from the Middle East and North Africa. Yet you never hear anybody talking about them. You don’t hear the UN demanding their right to return. You don’t see protests for the Jews forced out of their lands to be allowed back and reclaim what’s theirs. The world talks about ethnic cleansing and oppression and dehumanization, yet the only people ethnically cleansed and oppressed and dehumanized have been the Jews. In total, the Arab states are responsible for the displacement of over a million people… 500,000 Arabs and 800,000 Jews. But unlike Israel who absorbed the Jewish refugees, the Arab states refuse to absorb theirs. Why? Because for them these people are a weapon to use against Israel. The entire world has been lied to for 77 years. The Arabs aren’t the story. The Arabs aren’t the victims. And until the world stops denying the facts and historical records and evidence, nothing will ever change. 🎥 credit to Pierre Rehov

Mor Edge Insight

86,468 次观看 • 4 个月前

In 1948, the armies of 5 Arab Muslim states waged a genocidal war against the fledgling state of Israel. At the same time, the Jews were under an arms embargo by the British who were arming the Arabs and training them. Just prior to waging war against us, the Arab League leadership demanded that all Arabs on our land leave the land “temporarily” so that the Arab armies can sweep in and wipe out every last one of us. Now this isn’t conjecture. This is historical FACT. The majority of Arabs fled the land and waited for the Arab armies to wipe us out. But some Arabs chose to stay and fight alongside us against the invading armies. According to two UN reports, the total number of Arabs who fled the land was between 300,000 and 360,000. This number thrown around of 750,000 or a million is completely fictitious and was claimed once in an article in a Russian magazine. Now at the same time as the Arab armies forced the Arabs off the land, they simultaneously forced almost every single Jew out of every Arab land. The number of Jews forced to flee by force and having to leave all their livelihood and belongings totalled between 750,000 and 850,000. The vast majority fled to Israel, while a few fled to the US. Now unlike the Arabs, the Jews forced off their lands didn’t get a dedicated UN agency to protect them. They arrived in Israel and our country stood together and absorbed every last one. There are no Jewish refugees anymore because we took them all in and they became Israelis. The majority of the population of Israel are not European refugees. They’re from the Middle East and North Africa. Yet you never hear anybody talking about them. You don’t hear the UN demanding their right to return. You don’t see protests for the Jews forced out of their lands to be allowed back and reclaim what’s theirs. The world talks about ethnic cleansing and oppression and dehumanization, yet the only people ethnically cleansed and oppressed and dehumanized have been the Jews. In total, the Arab states are responsible for the displacement of over a million people… 300,000 Arabs and 800,000 Jews. But unlike Israel who absorbed the Jewish refugees, the Arab states refuse to absorb theirs. Why? Because for them these people are a weapon to use against Israel. The entire world has been lied to for 77 years. The Arabs aren’t the story. The Arabs aren’t the victims. And until the world stops denying the facts and historical records and evidence, nothing will ever change. 🎥 credit to Pierre Rehov

Mor Edge Insight

43,966 次观看 • 10 个月前