Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Ohio is 2nd state to introduce "Conception Begins at Erection Act" — makes it illegal for men to have sex without intent to make baby. Rep. Anita Somani introduced bill making it felony to "discharge semen without the intent to fertilize." •$1,000 first offense •$5,000 second offense •$10,000 any... subsequent offense In between performing multiple surgeries as a practicing OBGYN, State Rep. Anita Somani explained: "If you think it's absurd to regulate men, then you should think it's equally absurd to regulate women." There are some exceptions, such as when protection or contraceptions are used during sex. It also doesn’t apply when an individual is masturbating, donating sperm, or if the intercourse takes place between members of the LGBTQ+ community and thus doesn't "produce ova." What's good for the goose is good for the gander, right? #DemVoice1 #wtpBLUE #DemsUnitedshow more

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻

177,768 subscribers

2,047,848 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Red🇨🇦1 year ago

So if pregnancy begins at conception then so does child support, benefits like extra food, drs visits. Women should be able to take out life insurance on that fetus and be paid out if complications arise. Women should have 100% healthcare free of charge for pre/post care etc etc

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻1 year ago

A coalition of 18 "pro-life" state attorneys general filed a remarkable brief on Monday overflowing with spite toward the one group that apparently has not suffered enough yet from the chaotic moves of the Trump administration: infants.

Lalajerzeegrl1 year ago

That how you fight back!

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻1 year ago

"So this is to make a statement?" "It is a statement."

AeroTycoon 🟧 💔🌊 🌎 🛫🚀🛸🖖😷💉🥥🌴🇨🇦1 year ago

🤣🤣🤣🤣 Hey @maga men, do like your bodies being regulated?

Laurel Whitney1 year ago

Child support starts then too, right?

Gail Dow1 year ago

Please let this go into law. This could have a profound effect on rape cases. Also, I want the Ohio men to reap what they sowed at the ballot boxes.

An Old Woman, M.S. Applied Statistics1 year ago

I love this for MAGA!

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻1 year ago

As they say, it takes two to tango.

David1 year ago

@tizzywoman Technically conception begins when I tell MAGA to go fuck themselves.

Related Videos

This is why Senate Republicans MUST PASS H.R. 875, the bill that will deport illegals for a DUI American Immigration Attorney says that she’s had illegal clients who have had MULTIPLE DUIs and are still able to get Green Cards and get Citizenship “The United States House of Representatives has just passed a bill that will make DUI an inadmissible and deportable offense. And before you say that already exists, let me tell you, no, it doesn't. The Immigration and Nationality act does not qualify DUI as an inadmissible or deportable offense. Which means you can still get your green card with the DUI. You can still become a citizen with a DUI. Multiple DUIs, actually. I've gotten clients science that to become a United States citizen. But now with this new bill, it will make a person who has either been convicted or admits to the elements of DUI to be inadmissible and deportable from the United States. This doesn't matter if in the state the DUI is recognized as a misdemeanor or felony or even as a ticket. The bill called HR875 will make its way to the Senate. If the Senate passes it, then it goes in front of the President, the President signs it, then it becomes a law. And then the Immigration and Nationality act will be amended to include DUI as a deportable and inadmissible offense. If this passes, this will stop immigrants from being able to get their green cards with a DUI or even become a United States citizen with such charge.”

This is why Senate Republicans MUST PASS H.R. 875, the bill that will deport illegals for a DUI American Immigration Attorney says that she’s had illegal clients who have had MULTIPLE DUIs and are still able to get Green Cards and get Citizenship “The United States House of Representatives has just passed a bill that will make DUI an inadmissible and deportable offense. And before you say that already exists, let me tell you, no, it doesn't. The Immigration and Nationality act does not qualify DUI as an inadmissible or deportable offense. Which means you can still get your green card with the DUI. You can still become a citizen with a DUI. Multiple DUIs, actually. I've gotten clients science that to become a United States citizen. But now with this new bill, it will make a person who has either been convicted or admits to the elements of DUI to be inadmissible and deportable from the United States. This doesn't matter if in the state the DUI is recognized as a misdemeanor or felony or even as a ticket. The bill called HR875 will make its way to the Senate. If the Senate passes it, then it goes in front of the President, the President signs it, then it becomes a law. And then the Immigration and Nationality act will be amended to include DUI as a deportable and inadmissible offense. If this passes, this will stop immigrants from being able to get their green cards with a DUI or even become a United States citizen with such charge.”

Wall Street Apes

49,558 views • 1 year ago

The AUDACITY: A response to the men playing crybully while stealing women’s rights. There is NEVER an excuse for men to violate women’s privacy and boundaries. When men use their identity labels as an excuse for why women don’t deserve boundaries it normalizes abuse against women and girls. 1. It is perfectly safe for non conforming men to use the men’s room. 2. If some men feel unsafe in the men’s room they can fight for third spaces as women fought YEARS AND YEARS for ours. Do the work of fighting for legislation for yourself. Do not dismantle the provisions women fought for on the basis of SEX. 3. Women and girls are NOT HUMAN SHIELDS for men who feel uncomfortable. It is NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY to keep men safe. 4. Good men stay out so bad men stand out. Men who choose to violate women’s boundaries have identified themselves to women as abusers, predators, and perverts. To the male transformers: The only reason you have the luxury to be nonconforming now is because feminists fought for centuries against sex role stereotypes! Stop trying to steal our wins and success and trying to roll back our rights! We really don’t appreciate it. We do not feel sorry for you. Men are not a marginalized group. You steal our language to reify sex role stereotypes and then start hacking away at the hard won rights it took us centuries to achieve and you think we should be happy about it???? I don’t think so. Maybe if you called yourself men and broadened the definition of what it means to be a man rather than reinforcing sexist objectifying stereotypes about women. Maybe if you fought for third spaces. Maybe then you would have my respect. But instead to steal everything that belongs to women and then platt crybully when we rightfully get angry about? Stop!🛑

The AUDACITY: A response to the men playing crybully while stealing women’s rights. There is NEVER an excuse for men to violate women’s privacy and boundaries. When men use their identity labels as an excuse for why women don’t deserve boundaries it normalizes abuse against women and girls. 1. It is perfectly safe for non conforming men to use the men’s room. 2. If some men feel unsafe in the men’s room they can fight for third spaces as women fought YEARS AND YEARS for ours. Do the work of fighting for legislation for yourself. Do not dismantle the provisions women fought for on the basis of SEX. 3. Women and girls are NOT HUMAN SHIELDS for men who feel uncomfortable. It is NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY to keep men safe. 4. Good men stay out so bad men stand out. Men who choose to violate women’s boundaries have identified themselves to women as abusers, predators, and perverts. To the male transformers: The only reason you have the luxury to be nonconforming now is because feminists fought for centuries against sex role stereotypes! Stop trying to steal our wins and success and trying to roll back our rights! We really don’t appreciate it. We do not feel sorry for you. Men are not a marginalized group. You steal our language to reify sex role stereotypes and then start hacking away at the hard won rights it took us centuries to achieve and you think we should be happy about it???? I don’t think so. Maybe if you called yourself men and broadened the definition of what it means to be a man rather than reinforcing sexist objectifying stereotypes about women. Maybe if you fought for third spaces. Maybe then you would have my respect. But instead to steal everything that belongs to women and then platt crybully when we rightfully get angry about? Stop!🛑

Amy E. Sousa, MA Depth Psychology

18,657 views • 11 months ago

VACCINES IN FOOD: Tennessee lawmakers are calling for legislation requiring any food that "contains a vaccine or vaccine material" to carry the same sort of medical labelling as injectable vaccines or medications. "When you go into a grocery store, you should know as a consumer, this head of lettuce is a head of lettuce, the head of lettuce right next to it could contain a vaccine in it. All we're saying is if it does have the vaccine in it, make sure it's listed as a pharmaceutical so people can get the proper dosage." "This is more of a consumer protection bill... to make sure that if you're going in to buy tomatoes, and there's a polio vaccine in there, that you are aware that what you're buying has a polio vaccine." "The problem you have is, if it's not treated as a pharmaceutical, being the size and difference between you and me, how many tomatoes do I have to eat to get the proper dosage versus how many tomatoes that you have to eat? And if you eat too many, do you get an overdose?"

VACCINES IN FOOD: Tennessee lawmakers are calling for legislation requiring any food that "contains a vaccine or vaccine material" to carry the same sort of medical labelling as injectable vaccines or medications. "When you go into a grocery store, you should know as a consumer, this head of lettuce is a head of lettuce, the head of lettuce right next to it could contain a vaccine in it. All we're saying is if it does have the vaccine in it, make sure it's listed as a pharmaceutical so people can get the proper dosage." "This is more of a consumer protection bill... to make sure that if you're going in to buy tomatoes, and there's a polio vaccine in there, that you are aware that what you're buying has a polio vaccine." "The problem you have is, if it's not treated as a pharmaceutical, being the size and difference between you and me, how many tomatoes do I have to eat to get the proper dosage versus how many tomatoes that you have to eat? And if you eat too many, do you get an overdose?"

Wide Awake Media

102,972 views • 2 years ago

Q: 'What's the point of you drawing when AI can do it better and faster?' A: It's the act or feeling of doing something creative that IS the real outcome. Not the drawing others see. I think that's what keeps most artists learning - the feeling and mental state the drawing generates while you do it. Equally, if you want to skip that, you go for it.

Q: 'What's the point of you drawing when AI can do it better and faster?' A: It's the act or feeling of doing something creative that IS the real outcome. Not the drawing others see. I think that's what keeps most artists learning - the feeling and mental state the drawing generates while you do it. Equally, if you want to skip that, you go for it.

tomfoxdraws

20,024 views • 8 months ago

Under Ohio law LGBTQ+ teens get 6 free mental health sessions—Republicans want that eliminated. H.B. 172 bans 14-17 year olds from access to mental health without parent consent. Bill sponsor is "pastor entrepreneur" who says identity as LGBTQ+ is grounds to expel from church. Rep. Jonathan Newman also serves as the "pastor of counseling" at a megachurch in western Ohio. This bill has nothing to do with medication, surgery, or any inpatient treatment—it's about banning kids from talking to a therapist. These therapy sessions are used when a minor is in a crisis—and there is a safety concern regarding their parents' response to their gender or sexual identity. Not one mainstream news source is covering this story. Thank goodness for citizen reporting like this video. 👇 #DemVoice1 #wtpBLUE #DemsUnited

Under Ohio law LGBTQ+ teens get 6 free mental health sessions—Republicans want that eliminated. H.B. 172 bans 14-17 year olds from access to mental health without parent consent. Bill sponsor is "pastor entrepreneur" who says identity as LGBTQ+ is grounds to expel from church. Rep. Jonathan Newman also serves as the "pastor of counseling" at a megachurch in western Ohio. This bill has nothing to do with medication, surgery, or any inpatient treatment—it's about banning kids from talking to a therapist. These therapy sessions are used when a minor is in a crisis—and there is a safety concern regarding their parents' response to their gender or sexual identity. Not one mainstream news source is covering this story. Thank goodness for citizen reporting like this video. 👇 #DemVoice1 #wtpBLUE #DemsUnited

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻

29,662 views • 1 year ago

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Trung Phan

1,619,350 views • 2 years ago

The View whines that Knicks owner James Dolan accepted an invitation to have the team visit the White House: SARA HAINES: I think this puts the players in a really precarious position. Merely because Jim Dolan is admittedly a good friend of Donald Trump's. And to now put that on the players, your boss, the owner of the team you play for is extending this offer, accepting this offer. I don't - I know you might get people that refuse to go. I just think it's not fair to take any of the flowers and beauty of this moment and its unity and try to then place it on the players' back. ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: I totally agree. I think it puts the players in such an uncomfortable position, cause it was honestly the first thing I thought of once they won the championship, as a new Knicks fan, is like, "Oh no, they're going to get invited to the White House and there's this political discourse. Should they go, shout they not?" I think they should go if they want to. If they're comfortable going, because the White House is bigger than any one president and precedency. HAINES: It's our house. FARAH GRIFFIN: They earned the right to go as champions, but I also think they have the right to refuse too. If any individual players don't want to, that's their decision. And I also they can use the big platforms they have. I mean, these guys all have millions of followers on social media. If they want to stand up for causes or if they want to potentially critique this administration, there's a way that everyone should win. I don't think it's fair if they do decide to go, I don't think they should get hate it. It's there place to.

The View whines that Knicks owner James Dolan accepted an invitation to have the team visit the White House: SARA HAINES: I think this puts the players in a really precarious position. Merely because Jim Dolan is admittedly a good friend of Donald Trump's. And to now put that on the players, your boss, the owner of the team you play for is extending this offer, accepting this offer. I don't - I know you might get people that refuse to go. I just think it's not fair to take any of the flowers and beauty of this moment and its unity and try to then place it on the players' back. ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: I totally agree. I think it puts the players in such an uncomfortable position, cause it was honestly the first thing I thought of once they won the championship, as a new Knicks fan, is like, "Oh no, they're going to get invited to the White House and there's this political discourse. Should they go, shout they not?" I think they should go if they want to. If they're comfortable going, because the White House is bigger than any one president and precedency. HAINES: It's our house. FARAH GRIFFIN: They earned the right to go as champions, but I also think they have the right to refuse too. If any individual players don't want to, that's their decision. And I also they can use the big platforms they have. I mean, these guys all have millions of followers on social media. If they want to stand up for causes or if they want to potentially critique this administration, there's a way that everyone should win. I don't think it's fair if they do decide to go, I don't think they should get hate it. It's there place to.

Nicholas Fondacaro

67,122 views • 1 month ago

Argument between two young men, as one insisted he doesn’t believe in chasing women and feels it’s not worth it, while the other argued that it is worth it and encouraged going for what you want. The first said, “In the days of our forefathers, men didn’t apply so much pressure when they saw a woman they loved.” The second responded, “Those days are different from now. We’re living in a time where genuine feminine value feels scarce. Women back then are not the same as the ones we have today. As a man, if you see what you like and choose not to make an effort, that’s your løss. As for me, I’ll pay any price for the woman I love.”

Argument between two young men, as one insisted he doesn’t believe in chasing women and feels it’s not worth it, while the other argued that it is worth it and encouraged going for what you want. The first said, “In the days of our forefathers, men didn’t apply so much pressure when they saw a woman they loved.” The second responded, “Those days are different from now. We’re living in a time where genuine feminine value feels scarce. Women back then are not the same as the ones we have today. As a man, if you see what you like and choose not to make an effort, that’s your løss. As for me, I’ll pay any price for the woman I love.”

CHUKS 🍥

27,210 views • 2 months ago

Most people choose belonging over accuracy. The desire to fit in overpowers the desire for truth. "A lot of the time, people will tell you, “Don’t care what other people think about you,” but we all care what other people think—often for very good reason, which is that if people think well of you, it benefits you in life. It puts you in a good position; you are rewarded for it. It helps you accomplish things. It makes you safer. It just feels good. Belonging is a critical part of being human. However, especially in the modern world, the desire to belong can often run counter to the desire to understand or be accurate. If you have to choose between “I could believe this thing and be ostracized or criticized or outcast from my community” or “I could believe this other thing, which may not be that accurate, but it will get me praised and rewarded and accepted by my community,” a lot of the time, the desire to belong overpowers the desire to understand." James Clear on The Knowledge Project

Most people choose belonging over accuracy. The desire to fit in overpowers the desire for truth. "A lot of the time, people will tell you, “Don’t care what other people think about you,” but we all care what other people think—often for very good reason, which is that if people think well of you, it benefits you in life. It puts you in a good position; you are rewarded for it. It helps you accomplish things. It makes you safer. It just feels good. Belonging is a critical part of being human. However, especially in the modern world, the desire to belong can often run counter to the desire to understand or be accurate. If you have to choose between “I could believe this thing and be ostracized or criticized or outcast from my community” or “I could believe this other thing, which may not be that accurate, but it will get me praised and rewarded and accepted by my community,” a lot of the time, the desire to belong overpowers the desire to understand." James Clear on The Knowledge Project

Shane Parrish

63,966 views • 6 months ago

This is absurd. Weapons screening will begin at the Minnesota State Capitol when session starts next week. If you have a permit to carry, you will be expected to vocalize that fact to screeners, the screening image will highlight the area of the body where your gun is carried, and you will be pulled aside for further screening. Every bit of this is absurd. PTC carriers have already gone through advanced background checks to comply with carry, meaning they have been verified to be felony-free. PTC carriers should not have to be singled out or be made to vocalize that they are carrying, nor have an image displayed on where their weapon is concealed. All of these things make PTC carriers vulnerable to those with ill intent. Screening is fine, but it needs to be more discreet for PTC carriers.

This is absurd. Weapons screening will begin at the Minnesota State Capitol when session starts next week. If you have a permit to carry, you will be expected to vocalize that fact to screeners, the screening image will highlight the area of the body where your gun is carried, and you will be pulled aside for further screening. Every bit of this is absurd. PTC carriers have already gone through advanced background checks to comply with carry, meaning they have been verified to be felony-free. PTC carriers should not have to be singled out or be made to vocalize that they are carrying, nor have an image displayed on where their weapon is concealed. All of these things make PTC carriers vulnerable to those with ill intent. Screening is fine, but it needs to be more discreet for PTC carriers.

CrimeWatchMpls

74,865 views • 5 months ago

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Tish Hyman GRILLS Rep. Ro Khanna (D) to his face on supporting men in women's bathrooms. "Listen to me. Women and men are NOT the same. There's NO such thing as a TRANS!" Tish is the same woman kicked out of Gold's Gym for exposing they let MEN in the women's locker rooms. "You need to open up this bill and protect WOMEN! NONE of the women here are protected by state law!" "I'm not a Democrat or Republican. I AM A WOMAN, who is a lesbian...a lot of this is going on and YOU need to do something about it. Republicans will back you on it. DEMOCRATS need to do something. TRANS ARE NOT WOMEN. THEY ARE MEN." 📽️ WomenAreReal

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Tish Hyman GRILLS Rep. Ro Khanna (D) to his face on supporting men in women's bathrooms. "Listen to me. Women and men are NOT the same. There's NO such thing as a TRANS!" Tish is the same woman kicked out of Gold's Gym for exposing they let MEN in the women's locker rooms. "You need to open up this bill and protect WOMEN! NONE of the women here are protected by state law!" "I'm not a Democrat or Republican. I AM A WOMAN, who is a lesbian...a lot of this is going on and YOU need to do something about it. Republicans will back you on it. DEMOCRATS need to do something. TRANS ARE NOT WOMEN. THEY ARE MEN." 📽️ WomenAreReal

Eric Daugherty

178,729 views • 7 months ago

Nikki Haley starts out with decent points, that I think many parents on the left and right agree could be a problem. 1) If you have an individual with male genitalia changing in a female school locker room, it's certainly fair for parents to get upset about it. 2) If you have a trans women playing women sports in high school, it is also fair for parents to feel it may be unfair. (Note that you could fit every single trans athlete in America, high school and college, on a Boeing Jet and still have plenty of empty seats. It's not the massive problem people claim.) But... Haley claiming that trans women are causing young women to commit suicide, without any data to back up her claim, is pathetic and disgusting. I think most of us agree that there are issues when it comes to the intermingling of different people in certain settings, especially when nudity is involved. I also think that there are solutions for it all if we'd just listen instead of yell, create a dialogue instead of a diatribe and stop painting everyone who disagrees as being extreme. Thoughts?

Nikki Haley starts out with decent points, that I think many parents on the left and right agree could be a problem. 1) If you have an individual with male genitalia changing in a female school locker room, it's certainly fair for parents to get upset about it. 2) If you have a trans women playing women sports in high school, it is also fair for parents to feel it may be unfair. (Note that you could fit every single trans athlete in America, high school and college, on a Boeing Jet and still have plenty of empty seats. It's not the massive problem people claim.) But... Haley claiming that trans women are causing young women to commit suicide, without any data to back up her claim, is pathetic and disgusting. I think most of us agree that there are issues when it comes to the intermingling of different people in certain settings, especially when nudity is involved. I also think that there are solutions for it all if we'd just listen instead of yell, create a dialogue instead of a diatribe and stop painting everyone who disagrees as being extreme. Thoughts?

Brian Krassenstein

209,501 views • 3 years ago

A furious Thomas Tuchel asked if he accepts the referee's apology: "Very difficult. This is a semifinal, it's not the moment for apologies. Really not. It's not the moment for two huge violations of rules and then an apology. We all have to go to our limits, all have to suffer, all have to play without mistakes. The referees at this level also have to do that. When you don't deliver, it doesn't help when you apologize, even though of course as sportsmen we accept it" 🎥 FC Bayern München

A furious Thomas Tuchel asked if he accepts the referee's apology: "Very difficult. This is a semifinal, it's not the moment for apologies. Really not. It's not the moment for two huge violations of rules and then an apology. We all have to go to our limits, all have to suffer, all have to play without mistakes. The referees at this level also have to do that. When you don't deliver, it doesn't help when you apologize, even though of course as sportsmen we accept it" 🎥 FC Bayern München

Bayern & Germany

1,360,416 views • 2 years ago

In Rust, error handling is opt-out, not opt-in. Alice Ryhl (Rust for Android at Google, Rust language advisor & Tokio maintainer) explains: “The other thing I think is quite good is error handling. So on one hand, Rust doesn't really use exceptions, so it actually returns the error as a value. So you return a value that's, using an enum, either the result or the error. And the way this is done is that there's an operator `?` - so you write: my_function and then a question mark at the end - which means if this function fails, return the error. So it's really easy to handle errors but it's not serial characters like it is with exceptions, so it's explicit. On the other hand, if you forget to put the question mark, that's a compilation error. So you have to check it, and of course you can also have it manually, but the point is it's this idea of there are these things where you write some code and there's some implicit error condition you didn't think of and now you just took down your server or something.”

In Rust, error handling is opt-out, not opt-in. Alice Ryhl (Rust for Android at Google, Rust language advisor & Tokio maintainer) explains: “The other thing I think is quite good is error handling. So on one hand, Rust doesn't really use exceptions, so it actually returns the error as a value. So you return a value that's, using an enum, either the result or the error. And the way this is done is that there's an operator `?` - so you write: my_function and then a question mark at the end - which means if this function fails, return the error. So it's really easy to handle errors but it's not serial characters like it is with exceptions, so it's explicit. On the other hand, if you forget to put the question mark, that's a compilation error. So you have to check it, and of course you can also have it manually, but the point is it's this idea of there are these things where you write some code and there's some implicit error condition you didn't think of and now you just took down your server or something.”

The Pragmatic Engineer

52,059 views • 2 months ago

NEW: Senator Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) has introduced a bill w/ six Senate GOP co-sponsors that would change U.S. law to allow any naturalized American to have their citizenship stripped away if they’ve been convicted of any type of felony fraud going back to September of 1996 and make fraud a deportable offense without any financial threshold. The “Fraud Accountability Act” would apply to any felony fraud conviction against a private person, a corporation, or a government entity, and would remove a $10,000 threshold in current U.S. law that makes fraud a deportable offense. Sen. Blackburn tells me the bill is key to “provide this avenue so that these individuals who would come here and defraud the taxpayer are going to be removed from the country.” As for the likelihood of any Democratic support? “I think they should support it, I mean why would anybody be pro fraud?” Blackburn tells me. Bill cosponsors include Senator John Cornyn Lindsey Graham Senator Bill Hagerty Tom Cotton Senator Kevin Cramer Senator Ted Budd

NEW: Senator Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) has introduced a bill w/ six Senate GOP co-sponsors that would change U.S. law to allow any naturalized American to have their citizenship stripped away if they’ve been convicted of any type of felony fraud going back to September of 1996 and make fraud a deportable offense without any financial threshold. The “Fraud Accountability Act” would apply to any felony fraud conviction against a private person, a corporation, or a government entity, and would remove a $10,000 threshold in current U.S. law that makes fraud a deportable offense. Sen. Blackburn tells me the bill is key to “provide this avenue so that these individuals who would come here and defraud the taxpayer are going to be removed from the country.” As for the likelihood of any Democratic support? “I think they should support it, I mean why would anybody be pro fraud?” Blackburn tells me. Bill cosponsors include Senator John Cornyn Lindsey Graham Senator Bill Hagerty Tom Cotton Senator Kevin Cramer Senator Ted Budd

Bill Melugin

132,220 views • 6 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: JD Vance responds to the resignation of NCTC Director Joe Kent, who opposed the Iran strikes "It's one thing to have a disagreement of opinion." "That said...when POTUS makes a decision, it's your job to help make that decision as effective and successful as possible." "If you are on the team and you can't help implement the decisions of his administration, he has the right to make those decisions, then it's a good thing for you to resign." "And I think that's exactly right. It's fine to disagree, but once the President makes a decision, it's up to everybody who serves in his administration to make it as successful as possible." "That's how I do my job, and I think that's how everybody in the administration should do their job too." 🇺🇸

🚨 JUST IN: JD Vance responds to the resignation of NCTC Director Joe Kent, who opposed the Iran strikes "It's one thing to have a disagreement of opinion." "That said...when POTUS makes a decision, it's your job to help make that decision as effective and successful as possible." "If you are on the team and you can't help implement the decisions of his administration, he has the right to make those decisions, then it's a good thing for you to resign." "And I think that's exactly right. It's fine to disagree, but once the President makes a decision, it's up to everybody who serves in his administration to make it as successful as possible." "That's how I do my job, and I think that's how everybody in the administration should do their job too." 🇺🇸

Eric Daugherty

477,990 views • 4 months ago

Due to the Australian sex discrimination commissioners interpretation of the law women are having to: • Go to the high court to reestablish that we are still included in the legislation that was created specifically for us • Lesbians have to go to a tribunal for a second time to reestablish that heterosexual men are not lesbians • A woman is being dragged through a state tribunal for saying that men who claim to be women cannot breastfeed • Women are losing both employment & volunteer positions for asserting the *fact* that men are not women • A woman is appealing a $95,000 fine for using publicly available information to inform people that there are men in women’s sport • Women are being threatened with punishment if they don’t compete with the men in sport • School aged girls are not drinking water at school - or not attending at all for the week of their period - so they don’t have to use unisex bathrooms • Women currently & formally in prison are revealing the sexual assaults they have experienced due to men who claim to be women locked in cells with them The current *interpretation* of Australia’s sex discrimination act - accepted by the full federal court for reasons known only to them - is not creating less discrimination. In fact, it’s creating much more. Interestingly, it’s simultaneously proving that everyone knows exactly who the women & girls actually are, because we’re the ones being punished. Gender ideology has failed and is being rejected in almost every other country it attempted to thrive within. It has brought down the careers of many politicians who didn’t have the metaphorical balls to acknowledge reality and fix the problem. To think that Australian is any different is as ignorant as it is insane. This is not a “culture war”, Anthony Albanese. It’s a war on women & girls.

Due to the Australian sex discrimination commissioners interpretation of the law women are having to: • Go to the high court to reestablish that we are still included in the legislation that was created specifically for us • Lesbians have to go to a tribunal for a second time to reestablish that heterosexual men are not lesbians • A woman is being dragged through a state tribunal for saying that men who claim to be women cannot breastfeed • Women are losing both employment & volunteer positions for asserting the fact that men are not women • A woman is appealing a $95,000 fine for using publicly available information to inform people that there are men in women’s sport • Women are being threatened with punishment if they don’t compete with the men in sport • School aged girls are not drinking water at school - or not attending at all for the week of their period - so they don’t have to use unisex bathrooms • Women currently & formally in prison are revealing the sexual assaults they have experienced due to men who claim to be women locked in cells with them The current interpretation of Australia’s sex discrimination act - accepted by the full federal court for reasons known only to them - is not creating less discrimination. In fact, it’s creating much more. Interestingly, it’s simultaneously proving that everyone knows exactly who the women & girls actually are, because we’re the ones being punished. Gender ideology has failed and is being rejected in almost every other country it attempted to thrive within. It has brought down the careers of many politicians who didn’t have the metaphorical balls to acknowledge reality and fix the problem. To think that Australian is any different is as ignorant as it is insane. This is not a “culture war”, Anthony Albanese. It’s a war on women & girls.

Sall Grover

78,780 views • 1 month ago