Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Ok… so I did some digging, and yes, it appears President Trump did have a PLAN B if SCOTUS ruled against him. The contingency plans include EXPANDED use of Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, which allows tariffs on national security grounds and has already been used to...

MJTruthUltra's profile picture

MJTruthUltra

646,541 subscribers

1,194,157 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморНовости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Trump decides to take on US Supreme Court: Effective immediately, all Section 232 national security tariffs and existing Section 301 tariffs will remain fully in force. Today, He will sign an order today to impose additional 10% global tariff under Section 122, on top of the normal tariffs already being charged.
0:35

Trump decides to take on US Supreme Court: Effective immediately, all Section 232 national security tariffs and existing Section 301 tariffs will remain fully in force. Today, He will sign an order today to impose additional 10% global tariff under Section 122, on top of the normal tariffs already being charged.

Megh Updates 🚨™

70,550 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

President Trump will always put America’s national security and Americans first. And as I have said before, the President has multiple tools in his toolbox. Let’s be clear: the Court did not rule against this Administration’s tariffs. It only said IEEPA can’t be used to raise revenue. We will immediately shift to other proven authorities—Sections 232, 301, and 122—to keep our tariff strategy strong.
1:21

President Trump will always put America’s national security and Americans first. And as I have said before, the President has multiple tools in his toolbox. Let’s be clear: the Court did not rule against this Administration’s tariffs. It only said IEEPA can’t be used to raise revenue. We will immediately shift to other proven authorities—Sections 232, 301, and 122—to keep our tariff strategy strong.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent

1,152,395 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent just STUNNED the "Experts," he and Trump have been making big plans and it's FULL-STEAM AHEAD Tariff revenue will be *unchanged* in 2026. Boom. "Let's be clear about what today's ruling WAS and what it WASN'T. Despite the misplaced GLOATING from Democrats, ill-informed media outlets, and the very people who gutted our industrial base, the Court did not rule against President Trump's tariffs." "Six justices simply ruled that IEEPA authorities cannot be used to raise even $1 of revenue." "This administration will invoke alternative legal authorities to replace the IEEPA tariffs." "We will be leveraging Section 232 and Section 301 tariff authorities that have been validated through thousands of legal challenges." "Treasury's estimates show that the use of Section 122 authority, combined with potentially enhanced Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs, will result in virtually unchanged tariff revenue in 2026."
1:22

🚨 JUST IN: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent just STUNNED the "Experts," he and Trump have been making big plans and it's FULL-STEAM AHEAD Tariff revenue will be *unchanged* in 2026. Boom. "Let's be clear about what today's ruling WAS and what it WASN'T. Despite the misplaced GLOATING from Democrats, ill-informed media outlets, and the very people who gutted our industrial base, the Court did not rule against President Trump's tariffs." "Six justices simply ruled that IEEPA authorities cannot be used to raise even $1 of revenue." "This administration will invoke alternative legal authorities to replace the IEEPA tariffs." "We will be leveraging Section 232 and Section 301 tariff authorities that have been validated through thousands of legal challenges." "Treasury's estimates show that the use of Section 122 authority, combined with potentially enhanced Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs, will result in virtually unchanged tariff revenue in 2026."

Eric Daugherty

2,220,650 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just announced he’s immediately signing an executive order imposing an ADDITIONAL 10% tariff across the board on national security grounds, under Section 122 Trump has also declared ALL tariffs under Section 301 will REMAIN IN PLACE. “We’ll be able to take in MORE money, and there will no longer be doubt!” LFG! 🇺🇸🔥
0:45

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just announced he’s immediately signing an executive order imposing an ADDITIONAL 10% tariff across the board on national security grounds, under Section 122 Trump has also declared ALL tariffs under Section 301 will REMAIN IN PLACE. “We’ll be able to take in MORE money, and there will no longer be doubt!” LFG! 🇺🇸🔥

Nick Sortor

465,803 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

President Trump said existing tariffs imposed under other trade authorities known as Section 232 and Section 301 remain "in full force and effect." He also said he will sign an executive order Friday to impose a 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows the president to impose a baseline tariff of up to 15% for no more than 150 days to deal with "large and serious" balance-of-payments deficits. The president also said he will initiate investigations under Section 301 of the Trade Act to protect the country from unfair trading practices from foreign countries and companies. Mr. Trump has invoked that law to impose tariffs before.
1:00

President Trump said existing tariffs imposed under other trade authorities known as Section 232 and Section 301 remain "in full force and effect." He also said he will sign an executive order Friday to impose a 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows the president to impose a baseline tariff of up to 15% for no more than 150 days to deal with "large and serious" balance-of-payments deficits. The president also said he will initiate investigations under Section 301 of the Trade Act to protect the country from unfair trading practices from foreign countries and companies. Mr. Trump has invoked that law to impose tariffs before.

CBS News

41,476 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Former Deputy Assistant AG John Yoo says there is still HOPE that Trump can reimpose tariffs after the Supreme Court ruled against them. "Actually, President Trump could turn around tomorrow and start the process of reimposing tariffs. He doesn't need new legislation from Congress. There are a bunch of federal statutes. They go by fancy terms like Super 301 and Section 232. There are a bunch of existing trade laws. In fact, President Trump can use IEEPA itself again. The thing that the Court is saying is that you have to do it in a certain way. You have to use the trade laws to be specific as to a country and what that country is doing. Is that country a national security threat?"
1:27

Former Deputy Assistant AG John Yoo says there is still HOPE that Trump can reimpose tariffs after the Supreme Court ruled against them. "Actually, President Trump could turn around tomorrow and start the process of reimposing tariffs. He doesn't need new legislation from Congress. There are a bunch of federal statutes. They go by fancy terms like Super 301 and Section 232. There are a bunch of existing trade laws. In fact, President Trump can use IEEPA itself again. The thing that the Court is saying is that you have to do it in a certain way. You have to use the trade laws to be specific as to a country and what that country is doing. Is that country a national security threat?"

DeVory Darkins

262,837 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

"Actually, President Trump could turn around tomorrow and start the process of reimposing tariffs. He doesn't need new legislation from Congress. There are a bunch of federal statutes. They go by fancy terms like Super 301 and Section 232. There are a bunch of existing trade laws. In fact, President Trump can use IEEPA itself again. The thing that the Court is saying is that you have to do it in a certain way. You have to use the trade laws to be specific as to a country and what that country is doing. Is that country a national security threat?" ~ John Yoo former Deputy Asst Atty General
1:26

"Actually, President Trump could turn around tomorrow and start the process of reimposing tariffs. He doesn't need new legislation from Congress. There are a bunch of federal statutes. They go by fancy terms like Super 301 and Section 232. There are a bunch of existing trade laws. In fact, President Trump can use IEEPA itself again. The thing that the Court is saying is that you have to do it in a certain way. You have to use the trade laws to be specific as to a country and what that country is doing. Is that country a national security threat?" ~ John Yoo former Deputy Asst Atty General

Farm Girl Carrie 👩‍🌾

11,633 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

I don't wish ill on anybody, but Trump might not have the ability, strength, and discipline to make decisions right now. This is a potential NATIONAL SECURITY RISK. So it's just fair to ask for the truth. Did Trump have a stroke?
1:44

I don't wish ill on anybody, but Trump might not have the ability, strength, and discipline to make decisions right now. This is a potential NATIONAL SECURITY RISK. So it's just fair to ask for the truth. Did Trump have a stroke?

CALL TO ACTIVISM

73,709 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

KABOOM — Your boy called it.💥 “Effective immediately, all National Security TARIFFS, Section 232 and existing Section 301 TARIFFS, remain in place, and in full force and effect. Today I will sign an Order to impose a 10% GLOBAL TARIFF, under Section 122, over and above our normal TARIFFS already being charged, and we are also initiating several Section 301 and other Investigations to protect our Country from unfair Trading practices. Thank you for your attention to this matter.“
1:00

KABOOM — Your boy called it.💥 “Effective immediately, all National Security TARIFFS, Section 232 and existing Section 301 TARIFFS, remain in place, and in full force and effect. Today I will sign an Order to impose a 10% GLOBAL TARIFF, under Section 122, over and above our normal TARIFFS already being charged, and we are also initiating several Section 301 and other Investigations to protect our Country from unfair Trading practices. Thank you for your attention to this matter.“

MJTruthUltra

254,304 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN — STEPHEN MILLER UNLEASHES: "As horrendous as the Supreme Court ruling was, as poorly as it reflects on John Roberts' court and the continued TORTURING of our statutes and our constitution, here's the good news!" "The court also affirmed the president has the authority under section 301, section 232, section 122, section 338, and many other provisions of federal law, that the president can levy tariffs on foreign nations." "So his program will not only be fully reconstituted, but it will be EXPANDED." "The Supreme Court also affirmed that under IEEPA, the president has authority to restrict, impede, deny, license, or even fully embargo any foreign trade." "So the net result of all this is we're going to keep and grow the tariffs to bring back American manufacturing, which keeps prices low by incentivizing products to be made here in America." "But it also means that President Trump has even more tools when it comes to dealing with foreign countries that undermine our security." Stephen Miller BOOM.
1:27

🚨 JUST IN — STEPHEN MILLER UNLEASHES: "As horrendous as the Supreme Court ruling was, as poorly as it reflects on John Roberts' court and the continued TORTURING of our statutes and our constitution, here's the good news!" "The court also affirmed the president has the authority under section 301, section 232, section 122, section 338, and many other provisions of federal law, that the president can levy tariffs on foreign nations." "So his program will not only be fully reconstituted, but it will be EXPANDED." "The Supreme Court also affirmed that under IEEPA, the president has authority to restrict, impede, deny, license, or even fully embargo any foreign trade." "So the net result of all this is we're going to keep and grow the tariffs to bring back American manufacturing, which keeps prices low by incentivizing products to be made here in America." "But it also means that President Trump has even more tools when it comes to dealing with foreign countries that undermine our security." Stephen Miller BOOM.

Eric Daugherty

862,988 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Johnson: Trump has been accused of saying he wants to have a war on American citizens. I have no idea where that comes from. Host: Trump did say in the speech to military leaders that he wanted to use cities as training grounds for the US military. Johnson: Of course, yes. The National Guard troops drill once a month so they can be trained. Put them in cities, it's a win, win, win
1:12

Johnson: Trump has been accused of saying he wants to have a war on American citizens. I have no idea where that comes from. Host: Trump did say in the speech to military leaders that he wanted to use cities as training grounds for the US military. Johnson: Of course, yes. The National Guard troops drill once a month so they can be trained. Put them in cities, it's a win, win, win

FactPost

662,806 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

What I Posted 11/12/25…. 👇 “Trump already has the power to tariff. It was codified in 1962 & again in 1974 by Congress.” 👉 The Trade Expansion Act of 1962 👉 The Trade Act of 1974 What two laws did Trump just highlight today? 👉 The Trade Expansion Act of 1962 👉 The Trade Act of 1974 Not a lucky guess. It’s just reading. He exposed the SCOTUS, while simultaneous codifying his Powers. 5GW H/T: Derek Johnson
0:46

What I Posted 11/12/25…. 👇 “Trump already has the power to tariff. It was codified in 1962 & again in 1974 by Congress.” 👉 The Trade Expansion Act of 1962 👉 The Trade Act of 1974 What two laws did Trump just highlight today? 👉 The Trade Expansion Act of 1962 👉 The Trade Act of 1974 Not a lucky guess. It’s just reading. He exposed the SCOTUS, while simultaneous codifying his Powers. 5GW H/T: Derek Johnson

NewsTreason Channel 17

19,479 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Last year… President Trump warned of an economic disaster if the Supreme Court ruled against his tariff powers. I can’t imagine that President Trump did not plan for this. So, let’s see what happens. Also, watch the stock market…
0:44

Last year… President Trump warned of an economic disaster if the Supreme Court ruled against his tariff powers. I can’t imagine that President Trump did not plan for this. So, let’s see what happens. Also, watch the stock market…

MJTruthUltra

1,092,288 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Howard Lutnick has some explaining to do… 🚨 It appears Howard Lutnick’s Family greatly benefited from the SCOTUS Ruling against President Trump Today The Supreme Court just ruled against President Trump’s tariff powers, which we know could trigger refunds of up to $175 billion (or more). Well… Howard Lutnick was the Chairman and CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, a global financial services firm. Howard Lutnick stepped down from Cantor Fitzgerald when he became President Trump’s Commerce Secretary — then transferred control and ownership of Cantor Fitzgerald (and related entities like BGC Group and Newmark Group) to trusts benefiting his adult children, with his two eldest sons—Brandon Lutnick (Chairman & CEO) and Kyle Lutnick (Executive Vice Chairman)—taking primary leadership and control. In mid-2025, Cantor Fitzgerald marketed and reportedly executed deals to purchase importers' rights to potential FUTURE TARIFF REFUNDS at steep discounts of 20-30 cents on the dollar— essentially betting on a court ruling that the tariffs would be deemed illegal and refunds issued. With the SCOTUS decision now ruling against President Trump — any such acquired refund claims held by Cantor Fitzgerald stand to pay out at full value (100 cents on the dollar, minus what they paid upfront), delivering MILLIONS of dollars in profits to the family-controlled firm. To be clear… the SCOTUS’ ruling just means they are leaving mechanics of what gets paid back to the lower courts/Treasury, but the Lutnick Family betted against President Trump… and won. This is extremely concerning to me because Lutnick has publicly expressed strong confidence in a SCOTUS win for the tariffs for months saying he believes SCOTUS will rule in Trump’s favor… meanwhile, his children did the exact opposite and betted against it. This screams ethics violations…
0:55

Howard Lutnick has some explaining to do… 🚨 It appears Howard Lutnick’s Family greatly benefited from the SCOTUS Ruling against President Trump Today The Supreme Court just ruled against President Trump’s tariff powers, which we know could trigger refunds of up to $175 billion (or more). Well… Howard Lutnick was the Chairman and CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, a global financial services firm. Howard Lutnick stepped down from Cantor Fitzgerald when he became President Trump’s Commerce Secretary — then transferred control and ownership of Cantor Fitzgerald (and related entities like BGC Group and Newmark Group) to trusts benefiting his adult children, with his two eldest sons—Brandon Lutnick (Chairman & CEO) and Kyle Lutnick (Executive Vice Chairman)—taking primary leadership and control. In mid-2025, Cantor Fitzgerald marketed and reportedly executed deals to purchase importers' rights to potential FUTURE TARIFF REFUNDS at steep discounts of 20-30 cents on the dollar— essentially betting on a court ruling that the tariffs would be deemed illegal and refunds issued. With the SCOTUS decision now ruling against President Trump — any such acquired refund claims held by Cantor Fitzgerald stand to pay out at full value (100 cents on the dollar, minus what they paid upfront), delivering MILLIONS of dollars in profits to the family-controlled firm. To be clear… the SCOTUS’ ruling just means they are leaving mechanics of what gets paid back to the lower courts/Treasury, but the Lutnick Family betted against President Trump… and won. This is extremely concerning to me because Lutnick has publicly expressed strong confidence in a SCOTUS win for the tariffs for months saying he believes SCOTUS will rule in Trump’s favor… meanwhile, his children did the exact opposite and betted against it. This screams ethics violations…

MJTruthUltra

109,059 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump says Iran wants to visit him at the White House, and he might let them He will be meeting with his National Security Council in the Situation Room in 1 HOUR. Trump CLEARLY doesn't want a war. He's working toward peace. No decision on action has been made yet, Trump says.
1:18

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump says Iran wants to visit him at the White House, and he might let them He will be meeting with his National Security Council in the Situation Room in 1 HOUR. Trump CLEARLY doesn't want a war. He's working toward peace. No decision on action has been made yet, Trump says.

Nick Sortor

2,605,262 просмотров • 1 год назад

Trump just said that TikTok is not a national security risk because "you know who number one on TikTok is by far? Trump, me." 1) Classic Trump to put his ego AHEAD of national security. 2) We did a deep dive, and Trump is not anywhere near the top FIFTY, He is #124... Lmao! 🤣
2:01

Trump just said that TikTok is not a national security risk because "you know who number one on TikTok is by far? Trump, me." 1) Classic Trump to put his ego AHEAD of national security. 2) We did a deep dive, and Trump is not anywhere near the top FIFTY, He is #124... Lmao! 🤣

CALL TO ACTIVISM

437,799 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

President Trump tells the media he’s now going to have to go in a different direction on tariffs — “the direction that I should have gone the first time.” He then read aloud Justice Kavanaugh’s dissent for all of the press to hear. TRUMP: “But now I’m going to go in a different direction, probably the direction that I should have gone the first time.” “But I read the language. I’m very good at reading language, and it read our way 100%.” “But now I’ll go the way I could have gone originally, which is even stronger than our original choice, as Justice Kavanaugh — whose stock has gone so up…you have to see…I’m so proud of him — wrote in his dissent:” “Although I firmly disagree with the court’s holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a president’s ability to order tariffs going forward.” “So think of that — the decision might not substantially constrain. And it doesn’t. He’s right. In fact, I can charge much more than I was charging.” “Although I firmly disagree with the court’s holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a president’s ability to order tariffs going forward.” “That’s because numerous other federal statutes, which is so true, authorize the president to impose tariffs and might justify most, if not all, of the tariffs issued in this case — even more tariffs.” “Those statutes include, for example, the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, section 232.” “The Trade Act of 1974, sections 122, 201, 301, and the Tariff Act of 1930, section 338.” “All clear, but it’s a little bit longer process.”
2:03

President Trump tells the media he’s now going to have to go in a different direction on tariffs — “the direction that I should have gone the first time.” He then read aloud Justice Kavanaugh’s dissent for all of the press to hear. TRUMP: “But now I’m going to go in a different direction, probably the direction that I should have gone the first time.” “But I read the language. I’m very good at reading language, and it read our way 100%.” “But now I’ll go the way I could have gone originally, which is even stronger than our original choice, as Justice Kavanaugh — whose stock has gone so up…you have to see…I’m so proud of him — wrote in his dissent:” “Although I firmly disagree with the court’s holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a president’s ability to order tariffs going forward.” “So think of that — the decision might not substantially constrain. And it doesn’t. He’s right. In fact, I can charge much more than I was charging.” “Although I firmly disagree with the court’s holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a president’s ability to order tariffs going forward.” “That’s because numerous other federal statutes, which is so true, authorize the president to impose tariffs and might justify most, if not all, of the tariffs issued in this case — even more tariffs.” “Those statutes include, for example, the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, section 232.” “The Trade Act of 1974, sections 122, 201, 301, and the Tariff Act of 1930, section 338.” “All clear, but it’s a little bit longer process.”

Overton

278,996 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад