Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

OK, this video covers all the stuff that jam testified about separate from his statements directly implicating Durk. in the M for hire. Next, we will get to the Brian Steel cross-examination.

23,976 просмотров • 15 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨👀 DJ AKADEMIKS GETS A CALL FROM LAWYER BRADFORD COHEN AND HE’S SHOCKED OTF JAM POSTED ON INSTAGRAM DURING THE TRIAL DJ Akademiks received a call from popular attorney Bradford Cohen, who was in disbelief that OTF Jam allegedly posted messages to his Instagram while he is a cooperating witness in the middle of Lil Durk’s federal trial. And Cohen wasn’t holding back… 🗣️ Bradford Cohen: “This might be the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen in a case.” According to Cohen, there is already testimony establishing that the Instagram account belongs to Jam. During his testimony, Jam reportedly said he instructed someone to use that same account to post a message involving his address. That makes the recent posts potentially even more significant. ⚖️ WHY COHEN SAYS THIS COULD BE A MAJOR PROBLEM FOR JAM Cohen explained that Jam chose to cooperate with the government, meaning he agreed to certain conditions as part of that cooperation. If Jam is now publicly discussing the case, attacking Lil Durk, or potentially making statements about other witnesses, Cohen believes that could create serious issues for his cooperation agreement. And then there’s the alleged 5K1.1 issue. Cohen pointed out that prosecutors have the ability to consider a cooperating witness’s conduct when determining whether they receive the benefits they were expecting from their cooperation. 👀 BUT HERE’S WHERE IT GETS EVEN MORE INTERESTING… Jam’s posts could potentially give Durk’s defense another avenue to argue that Jam has bias or animosity toward Durk. One of the messages reportedly included: “Fuck Durk.” Cohen believes statements like that could potentially reinforce an argument that Jam has a personal motive or bias against Durk. And there’s another issue… During cross-examination, Jam reportedly denied making certain negative statements about Durk. But if his recent Instagram posts contradict that testimony, the defense could potentially use that inconsistency to attack his credibility. 🧠 THE TIMING IS WHAT MAKES THIS EVEN CRAZIER The prosecution has rested. The defense has rested. Closing arguments are coming. And now a key government cooperating witness is allegedly making public statements about the case from behind bars. Cohen explained that this creates a difficult situation for the government and potentially the judge as well. Could the defense ask to reopen its case? Could Jam potentially be brought back to the stand? Could the defense seek a mistrial? Cohen said those are possibilities that could be raised, although he does not expect the judge to simply grant a mistrial. Instead, the judge could potentially look for ways to address the issue without derailing the entire trial. 🚨 AND HERE’S THE BIGGER PICTURE: According to Cohen, this could ultimately become another issue for the defense to raise regarding Jam’s credibility, bias, the terms of his cooperation, and potential appellate issues. As Cohen put it, this is basically another layer of problems the government now has to deal with. And all of this happened right before closing arguments. 👀 THIS TRIAL JUST GOT EVEN MORE INTERESTING.

Cousin Tino ™️

81,469 просмотров • 6 дней назад