Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Okay friends, let's say you're building a list component ❖ Which method do you use? A – Using a variant set with options for each amount B – Use booleans to toggle visibility of a single list component

24,290 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля ˗ˏˋ rogie xcx ˎˊ˗
˗ˏˋ rogie xcx ˎˊ˗2 лет назад

C: @figma creates an iterator slot, where we can choose the number of clones of a component

Фото профиля luis.
luis.2 лет назад

@figma No one wants slots stop creating drama

Фото профиля Radley
Radley2 лет назад

A is bad because it’s a mess to scale. Try B+ For a simple list, we create a component with visibility booleans for the default number of items, usually 3, plus one more marked as “4+”. When 4+ is selected, it reveals visibility booleans for the remaining items (5–6 or 5–10).

Фото профиля luis.
luis.2 лет назад

Yeah that's nice! A+ for your B+

Фото профиля Henry Daggett
Henry Daggett2 лет назад

C: create both a list item component (that people can compose themselves) and a generic list component made of 3-6 list items that people can detach and use faster

Фото профиля Roni
Roni2 лет назад

B but not with boolean properties. Just let the user to hide extra options in the layer tree.

Фото профиля 🚀 Don ― Bailon
🚀 Don ― Bailon2 лет назад

I ended up by creating just a "list item container component" with a "list item component" inside. So you can detach the container and duplicate the list item component as many times as you need and edit them individually in the sidebar. It's not a problem to detach a container.

Фото профиля Karim Joreige
Karim Joreige2 лет назад

should add a repeatable property. Like you add variant, instance swap, boolean,.. you should be able to add a “repeatable” property. This way you only have to design a single component variant, and then in the instance property panel you would enter the # of times you wanted repeated. This would be super helpful for listings.

Фото профиля Addison James
Addison James2 лет назад

As a designer, B because it’s cleaner. But showing all states to a dev is problematic so sometimes A is needed for visibility.

Фото профиля Josh Armantrout
Josh Armantrout2 лет назад

+1 to everyone saying "wrap the list item in a detachable container"

Похожие видео