Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

One guy built a wedding camera app in a month and it now makes him over $1,000,000 a year. No team, no investors, no marketing budget. 100,000 downloads in the first month. Zero dollars on ads. He did not bolt marketing onto the product. He made using the product... the marketing. You cannot use the app alone. The host has to pull every guest into it. One wedding is not one user. It is 200 people scanning the same code in one evening. The guest liked it at someone else's wedding. A month later he throws his own event and brings his own crowd. The loop spins for free. It does not look like an ad. To the guest it is a gift. So they install it gladly. $2 to $50 subscriptions. 5% pay. That is $100,000 a month. He did not win on budget. He sewed the growth into the product itself. Could you build the loop, or is it just luck?show more

Marlow

10,910 subscribers

513,001 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Finanzen

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

A guy made $130,000 last month from a Shopify store he has not opened in 47 days. He asked Claude to spin up the store in one prompt. Picked one trending product from Alibaba. Uploaded it. Veo 3 generated every product video he has ever posted. ChatGPT writes every ad caption and every reply to customers. His only job is watching the orders land in Stripe. He is 24. He runs the store from the Notes app on his phone. He has never logged into the Shopify admin from a desktop. He says the password is saved in his iCloud and he has not had to type it. Most dropshippers spend their week answering DMs, editing product photos, A/B testing ad copy, and arguing with suppliers. He does none of that. The AI does the things that scale and he does the thing that does not, which is exactly nothing. His ad spend is $42,000 a month. Return on ad spend: 4.1. Refund rate: 6%. Average order value: $54. The math is boring. The reason it works is interesting. The less he touches the store, the more it prints. Every time he gets the urge to optimize something he closes the tab and goes to the gym. The store does not need his taste. The dropshippers losing to him spent ten years getting good at the parts AI now does for $20 a month. Save this before the dropshipping niche figures out AI does not need them.

A guy made $130,000 last month from a Shopify store he has not opened in 47 days. He asked Claude to spin up the store in one prompt. Picked one trending product from Alibaba. Uploaded it. Veo 3 generated every product video he has ever posted. ChatGPT writes every ad caption and every reply to customers. His only job is watching the orders land in Stripe. He is 24. He runs the store from the Notes app on his phone. He has never logged into the Shopify admin from a desktop. He says the password is saved in his iCloud and he has not had to type it. Most dropshippers spend their week answering DMs, editing product photos, A/B testing ad copy, and arguing with suppliers. He does none of that. The AI does the things that scale and he does the thing that does not, which is exactly nothing. His ad spend is $42,000 a month. Return on ad spend: 4.1. Refund rate: 6%. Average order value: $54. The math is boring. The reason it works is interesting. The less he touches the store, the more it prints. Every time he gets the urge to optimize something he closes the tab and goes to the gym. The store does not need his taste. The dropshippers losing to him spent ten years getting good at the parts AI now does for $20 a month. Save this before the dropshipping niche figures out AI does not need them.

Marlow

27,351 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

While you're looking at that canvas, it's saving him $15,000 a month. At 0:22 he shows how he turned $1.50 into 1,000 leads with verified emails. He built this sitting on a terrace. One afternoon. No team. No investor money. No office. Just a laptop, Claude, and n8n stitching everything together on one blue canvas. Each node is a job that used to cost a salary. One scrapes leads. One researches the company. One finds the right person. Two write the email and the DM, personalized based on everything the others found. A startup had 10 people doing this exact work. $15,000/month just in ops salaries. He does it for $200/month. $15,000 saved every month. $180,000 a year. 7 workflows. Zero employees in the loop. You spent 60 seconds watching it. It spent 60 seconds closing deals.

While you're looking at that canvas, it's saving him $15,000 a month. At 0:22 he shows how he turned $1.50 into 1,000 leads with verified emails. He built this sitting on a terrace. One afternoon. No team. No investor money. No office. Just a laptop, Claude, and n8n stitching everything together on one blue canvas. Each node is a job that used to cost a salary. One scrapes leads. One researches the company. One finds the right person. Two write the email and the DM, personalized based on everything the others found. A startup had 10 people doing this exact work. $15,000/month just in ops salaries. He does it for $200/month. $15,000 saved every month. $180,000 a year. 7 workflows. Zero employees in the loop. You spent 60 seconds watching it. It spent 60 seconds closing deals.

Superior

20,277 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A 22-year-old automated his entire YouTube channel using Claude. $8,000 a month. He doesn't even touch the videos. No camera. No editing. No burnout. Just Claude. He opens it once and tells it what to do. Claude handles everything: > finds trending topics in his niche > writes titles and descriptions built for the algorithm > generates full video scripts > creates tags, timestamps, promotional posts One prompt. One channel. One person. $8,000 a month running on autopilot. The channel works while he sleeps. While he eats. While he lives his life. Most people still think YouTube means filming, editing, grinding for years before seeing a dollar. He just taught an AI to do it for him. And while you're reading this — his channel is already getting views. The craziest part? He's not a developer. Not a tech guy. Not some Silicon Valley genius. He's just someone who stopped overcomplicating it. The tools exist. The opportunity is wide open. The only question is why it's still not you.

A 22-year-old automated his entire YouTube channel using Claude. $8,000 a month. He doesn't even touch the videos. No camera. No editing. No burnout. Just Claude. He opens it once and tells it what to do. Claude handles everything: > finds trending topics in his niche > writes titles and descriptions built for the algorithm > generates full video scripts > creates tags, timestamps, promotional posts One prompt. One channel. One person. $8,000 a month running on autopilot. The channel works while he sleeps. While he eats. While he lives his life. Most people still think YouTube means filming, editing, grinding for years before seeing a dollar. He just taught an AI to do it for him. And while you're reading this — his channel is already getting views. The craziest part? He's not a developer. Not a tech guy. Not some Silicon Valley genius. He's just someone who stopped overcomplicating it. The tools exist. The opportunity is wide open. The only question is why it's still not you.

Shelpid.WI3M

182,669 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This guy took a brand‑new app to #1 overall in the App Store and 1,000,000 downloads in under 3 days. For the FIRST TIME, he breaks down exactly how he did it, and we’re posting the full, RAW conversation right here on X To be clear, this is his first and only podcast on this playbook... And a little more context: this wasn’t luck. Jibran has taken 4 different apps to #1 in the App Store, including one that did $1.5M in 3 days and outranked ChatGPT He did it with a handful of creators, zero paid ads, and a product philosophy that blew my mind Here’s the core of what he taught me: > Your product and your marketing are not two separate things; they're the same thing. > What goes viral on TikTok is product validation. > What you learn from a hit video should change your UI, your App Store screenshots, your icon He ran that loop obsessively.. For his 2025 Wrapped app, he spent hundreds of hours in Figma asking one question: > “How does this look on TikTok?” Then he tracked: 1. What users screenshotted 2. What they shared to Snapchat 3. What slide they dropped off on The result was a #1 overall app in the App Store. Above EVERYTHING. Now he’s building because he realized he was spending hours every day doom‑scrolling TikTok looking for hooks and formats that worked So he built an AI to do it for him: > You tell it your app. > It tells you what to post, what’s trending in your niche, and what’s wrong with your existing videos. We go deep on all of it in this conversation. If you run a consumer app, this is the most useful 49 minutes you’ll spend this week

Alex Olim

106,009 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Mark Zuckerberg just quietly executed the marketing profession. He didn’t announce it. He described it. Zuckerberg: “The AI is actually probably going to be able to find who is going to be interested in your product better than you can.” He is not pitching a better ad tool. He is telling you that your intuition about your own customer is now inferior to his algorithm. For twenty years, the internet was built on demographics. Age. Location. Income. Founders built careers defending customer personas in boardrooms. Zuckerberg is telling you to burn them. Zuckerberg: “Don’t constrain who we’re going to reach.” When you tell the system who to target, you are not helping it. You are crippling it. Every audience filter a marketer applies is a ceiling disguised as a strategy. Human targeting is no longer a competitive advantage. It is a tax. And the takeover does not stop at the audience. It swallows the creative itself. Zuckerberg: “We’re going to be able to come up with like 4,000 different versions of your creative and just test them and figure out which one works best.” No agency on Earth can test four thousand variations in real time. The machine does not have taste. It has math. And math does not lose to intuition at scale. For a generation, distribution was the skill. When every company on Earth plugs into the same omniscient ad engine, distribution stops being a weapon. It becomes infrastructure. Like bandwidth. Like cloud compute. Nobody wins because they have better access to AWS. Soon, nobody will win because they have a better media buyer. Which leaves exactly one variable on the board. Zuckerberg: “You just focus on building the best product.” For a decade, mediocre products survived on superior distribution. Bad products with great funnels printed money. That arbitrage is dead. When distribution becomes a utility, the product has nowhere left to hide. Marketing was the mask. Zuckerberg just pulled it off. Most companies are about to find out they never had a product. They had a campaign.

Mark Zuckerberg just quietly executed the marketing profession. He didn’t announce it. He described it. Zuckerberg: “The AI is actually probably going to be able to find who is going to be interested in your product better than you can.” He is not pitching a better ad tool. He is telling you that your intuition about your own customer is now inferior to his algorithm. For twenty years, the internet was built on demographics. Age. Location. Income. Founders built careers defending customer personas in boardrooms. Zuckerberg is telling you to burn them. Zuckerberg: “Don’t constrain who we’re going to reach.” When you tell the system who to target, you are not helping it. You are crippling it. Every audience filter a marketer applies is a ceiling disguised as a strategy. Human targeting is no longer a competitive advantage. It is a tax. And the takeover does not stop at the audience. It swallows the creative itself. Zuckerberg: “We’re going to be able to come up with like 4,000 different versions of your creative and just test them and figure out which one works best.” No agency on Earth can test four thousand variations in real time. The machine does not have taste. It has math. And math does not lose to intuition at scale. For a generation, distribution was the skill. When every company on Earth plugs into the same omniscient ad engine, distribution stops being a weapon. It becomes infrastructure. Like bandwidth. Like cloud compute. Nobody wins because they have better access to AWS. Soon, nobody will win because they have a better media buyer. Which leaves exactly one variable on the board. Zuckerberg: “You just focus on building the best product.” For a decade, mediocre products survived on superior distribution. Bad products with great funnels printed money. That arbitrage is dead. When distribution becomes a utility, the product has nowhere left to hide. Marketing was the mask. Zuckerberg just pulled it off. Most companies are about to find out they never had a product. They had a campaign.

Dustin

139,573 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

He walked into a small shop and made it visible to the entire planet. One afternoon. 170 scans. A free app on his phone. He gets $400 for the scan. $99 every month for hosting. The result: a full 3D virtual tour anyone can walk through in a browser. Every shelf. Every product. Every detail of a store that most people would never find on a map. The owner gets more online visitors in a week than she got in-store visitors in a month. That gap is the business. Month one: $3,500. Month six: $18,000. The same model works for hotels, real estate listings, event venues, car dealerships, museums. Every physical space in every city is an untapped asset. Most owners have no idea this exists. He didn't wait for the right client. He walked into a shop and made one.

He walked into a small shop and made it visible to the entire planet. One afternoon. 170 scans. A free app on his phone. He gets $400 for the scan. $99 every month for hosting. The result: a full 3D virtual tour anyone can walk through in a browser. Every shelf. Every product. Every detail of a store that most people would never find on a map. The owner gets more online visitors in a week than she got in-store visitors in a month. That gap is the business. Month one: $3,500. Month six: $18,000. The same model works for hotels, real estate listings, event venues, car dealerships, museums. Every physical space in every city is an untapped asset. Most owners have no idea this exists. He didn't wait for the right client. He walked into a shop and made one.

Superior

16,952 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Do you actually understand what's happening. He built a personal local AI voice agent that fits in your pocket. Clients pay him $2,500/month to have one. It runs locally. No cloud. No rate limits. No data going anywhere. You talk to it and it acts in real systems, automatically, without a human in the loop. He looked at that device and didn't think about using it himself. He thought about who would pay him to build one for them. $28,000/month ops team. Five agents. $200/month in tools. Client saves $22,000. He earns $2,500/month to maintain it. They never cancel. Canceling means hiring the team back. 8 clients. $20,000/month recurring. Everyone is talking about AI voice agents like they're a personal productivity tool. He turned one into a business. Different outcome.

Do you actually understand what's happening. He built a personal local AI voice agent that fits in your pocket. Clients pay him $2,500/month to have one. It runs locally. No cloud. No rate limits. No data going anywhere. You talk to it and it acts in real systems, automatically, without a human in the loop. He looked at that device and didn't think about using it himself. He thought about who would pay him to build one for them. $28,000/month ops team. Five agents. $200/month in tools. Client saves $22,000. He earns $2,500/month to maintain it. They never cancel. Canceling means hiring the team back. 8 clients. $20,000/month recurring. Everyone is talking about AI voice agents like they're a personal productivity tool. He turned one into a business. Different outcome.

Superior

71,054 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A man who went to prison for talking people out of their money filmed himself doing it live, then sold the method as a course. 7 million people have watched him work. The man is Jordan Belfort. The film about him made him famous. What almost nobody has done is watch the real one, on camera, running the actual technique on a real prospect for 22 minutes with no script and no edit. And the way he does it is the reason to watch. He barely talks about the product. The first minutes are almost entirely questions, and every answer gets used against the person later in his own words. He is not persuading. He is collecting. Then the phrase the comments turned into a meme. He ends his key sentences with four words that make agreement feel like the neutral option and refusal feel like rudeness. Once you notice it, you cannot unhear it, and you will catch it in the next call you take. One viewer broke the whole method into 9 steps in a comment. It got 12 thousand likes, which tells you people are studying this video like a manual. Here is the uncomfortable part. Every technique in it is ordinary sales advice: listen, mirror, remove friction, set expectations. That is exactly what makes it worth studying. The tools were never the crime. The intent was. Learn what is being done to you and it stops working on you. That is the only defense there is. 22 minutes. No script. It is in the video.

A man who went to prison for talking people out of their money filmed himself doing it live, then sold the method as a course. 7 million people have watched him work. The man is Jordan Belfort. The film about him made him famous. What almost nobody has done is watch the real one, on camera, running the actual technique on a real prospect for 22 minutes with no script and no edit. And the way he does it is the reason to watch. He barely talks about the product. The first minutes are almost entirely questions, and every answer gets used against the person later in his own words. He is not persuading. He is collecting. Then the phrase the comments turned into a meme. He ends his key sentences with four words that make agreement feel like the neutral option and refusal feel like rudeness. Once you notice it, you cannot unhear it, and you will catch it in the next call you take. One viewer broke the whole method into 9 steps in a comment. It got 12 thousand likes, which tells you people are studying this video like a manual. Here is the uncomfortable part. Every technique in it is ordinary sales advice: listen, mirror, remove friction, set expectations. That is exactly what makes it worth studying. The tools were never the crime. The intent was. Learn what is being done to you and it stops working on you. That is the only defense there is. 22 minutes. No script. It is in the video.

Silverhand

1,466,252 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

THIS 17-YEAR-OLD SHOWED HIS APP STORE CONNECT LIVE ON CAMERA - $1.14 MILLION IN OCTOBER ALONE - AND HE BUILDS WITH AI interviewer asked him to refresh the page so no one could say it was fake - he refreshed - $1,140,000 in one month sitting right there on screen he's 17 - builds mobile consumer apps - his current one is CalAI - you take a photo of your food and it tells you the calories one idea, one app, one AI feature that solves a problem everyone has - and it scaled to $1.1M/month now Claude Opus 4.8 runs the entire YouTube automation layer on top - clipping, scripting, publishing - $16,567/month from one channel running on autopilot while the app keeps printing TJRmindset pulled 535,276 views in 7 days with the same setup - YouTube estimates $199/month but that's not where the money is - the money is in what the audience does after they watch 17 years old, one camera refresh, one number that changes how you think about what's actually possible right now

THIS 17-YEAR-OLD SHOWED HIS APP STORE CONNECT LIVE ON CAMERA - $1.14 MILLION IN OCTOBER ALONE - AND HE BUILDS WITH AI interviewer asked him to refresh the page so no one could say it was fake - he refreshed - $1,140,000 in one month sitting right there on screen he's 17 - builds mobile consumer apps - his current one is CalAI - you take a photo of your food and it tells you the calories one idea, one app, one AI feature that solves a problem everyone has - and it scaled to $1.1M/month now Claude Opus 4.8 runs the entire YouTube automation layer on top - clipping, scripting, publishing - $16,567/month from one channel running on autopilot while the app keeps printing TJRmindset pulled 535,276 views in 7 days with the same setup - YouTube estimates $199/month but that's not where the money is - the money is in what the audience does after they watch 17 years old, one camera refresh, one number that changes how you think about what's actually possible right now

Noisy

21,788 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A 23-year-old made $5,000 last month from AI. No employees. No office. He didn't write a single line of code. While you're still "thinking about getting into AI," he picked three tiny lanes and quietly took them. Lane 1 — Micro SaaS. He found one thing people pay to do by hand. Built one AI tool that does it in a click. Not a platform. One feature. $19/month, 300 people paying, and he hasn't touched it in weeks. Lane 2 — Productized AI agents. He built an AI agent that answers a dentist's phone, books the patient, and texts the confirmation. Set up once. The clinic pays $1,200 a month to keep it alive. He has nine of them now. He's never met a single patient. Lane 3 — Prompt libraries. He packaged the prompts that actually work "30 hooks that go viral," "50 cold emails that get replies" - into one file. Made it once. Sells it forever. Same file, every day, while he sleeps. Now the part that should sting a little. He didn't invent anything. The tools are free. The skills are free. AI does the hard part now. The only thing left to own is the niche and there are millions of them sitting wide open while everyone fights to build the next big app nobody asked for. He's not smarter than you. He just stopped scrolling and picked a lane. You're still scrolling.

A 23-year-old made $5,000 last month from AI. No employees. No office. He didn't write a single line of code. While you're still "thinking about getting into AI," he picked three tiny lanes and quietly took them. Lane 1 — Micro SaaS. He found one thing people pay to do by hand. Built one AI tool that does it in a click. Not a platform. One feature. $19/month, 300 people paying, and he hasn't touched it in weeks. Lane 2 — Productized AI agents. He built an AI agent that answers a dentist's phone, books the patient, and texts the confirmation. Set up once. The clinic pays $1,200 a month to keep it alive. He has nine of them now. He's never met a single patient. Lane 3 — Prompt libraries. He packaged the prompts that actually work "30 hooks that go viral," "50 cold emails that get replies" - into one file. Made it once. Sells it forever. Same file, every day, while he sleeps. Now the part that should sting a little. He didn't invent anything. The tools are free. The skills are free. AI does the hard part now. The only thing left to own is the niche and there are millions of them sitting wide open while everyone fights to build the next big app nobody asked for. He's not smarter than you. He just stopped scrolling and picked a lane. You're still scrolling.

Rich

11,435 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Do you actually understand what's happening. He built an AI box that costs less than one month of AI subscriptions. He built his for under $200. A Raspberry Pi 5 with a touchscreen and a power bank. He almost didn't bother. It looked too simple to matter. Then he ran two commands, connected six agents, and watched it start handling work he used to pay $250/month in subscriptions for. Month two cost: $3 in electricity. Now he shows people the setup and watches their faces. It still looks like a toy. It stopped being one around the time the first invoice came in.

Do you actually understand what's happening. He built an AI box that costs less than one month of AI subscriptions. He built his for under $200. A Raspberry Pi 5 with a touchscreen and a power bank. He almost didn't bother. It looked too simple to matter. Then he ran two commands, connected six agents, and watched it start handling work he used to pay $250/month in subscriptions for. Month two cost: $3 in electricity. Now he shows people the setup and watches their faces. It still looks like a toy. It stopped being one around the time the first invoice came in.

Superior

41,136 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A student used AI to cheat his way through an entire Amazon interview. Then recorded himself doing it. Then posted the video online. Amazon saw it. Called Columbia University. Threatened to stop hiring from the school entirely unless they expelled him. Columbia expelled him. He posted about the expulsion on Twitter. VCs saw it. $5 million raised in 24 hours. Roy Lee did not just build an interview cheat tool. He accidentally ran the most insane product launch in Silicon Valley history. Got expelled. Went viral. Raised $5 million. All in the same week. The rules of how to build a company just changed and most people did not notice. The best marketing is not an ad campaign. It is a story so unbelievable that people cannot stop sharing it. Roy Lee did not plan any of this. He just refused to hide what he was doing. And the internet rewarded him with $5 million.

A student used AI to cheat his way through an entire Amazon interview. Then recorded himself doing it. Then posted the video online. Amazon saw it. Called Columbia University. Threatened to stop hiring from the school entirely unless they expelled him. Columbia expelled him. He posted about the expulsion on Twitter. VCs saw it. $5 million raised in 24 hours. Roy Lee did not just build an interview cheat tool. He accidentally ran the most insane product launch in Silicon Valley history. Got expelled. Went viral. Raised $5 million. All in the same week. The rules of how to build a company just changed and most people did not notice. The best marketing is not an ad campaign. It is a story so unbelievable that people cannot stop sharing it. Roy Lee did not plan any of this. He just refused to hide what he was doing. And the internet rewarded him with $5 million.

CyrilXBT

21,052 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

He started using Claude AI and made $25,000 in his first month The guy could not even hide how much it changed his life. He paid for Claude and treated it like a real business partner. Built workflows that automate client work, content and outreach all in one place. What used to take him 12 hours a day now takes 2. He started taking on triple the clients without burning out once. At $5,000 per client and five clients a month, the numbers move fast. That is $25,000 landing in his account from a tool that costs $20. Most people use Claude to write captions and call it a day. He used it to rebuild his entire income from the ground up. Follow if you want the exact workflows he uses to scale this.

He started using Claude AI and made $25,000 in his first month The guy could not even hide how much it changed his life. He paid for Claude and treated it like a real business partner. Built workflows that automate client work, content and outreach all in one place. What used to take him 12 hours a day now takes 2. He started taking on triple the clients without burning out once. At $5,000 per client and five clients a month, the numbers move fast. That is $25,000 landing in his account from a tool that costs $20. Most people use Claude to write captions and call it a day. He used it to rebuild his entire income from the ground up. Follow if you want the exact workflows he uses to scale this.

winkle.

21,373 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A 24-year-old launched a faceless YouTube channel 13 days ago. In the first month, he has already accumulated $4,000, but he has not shot a single frame.. His investment: a $20 subscription to Claude. No camera, no editor, no voice of his own. THE SYSTEM WORKS LIKE THIS: - Claude writes the full script from one topic prompt - an AI voice narrates it - an AI tool generates the animation and the visuals - one template, repeated forever: "the economics of owning an airport" / "…a private jet" / "…a hospital" - it publishes on a schedule while he sleeps The first 12 days, from zero: > "Why a Fan Can Kill You" -> 272,000 views > second video -> 136,000 views in 6 days > subscribers -> 4,300 > month-one pace -> ~$4,000 And it's replicable. One of his students launched "Mr. Finance" on the same template 13 days ago: > 10,800 subscribers > finance-niche RPM -> ~$7 per 1,000 views > one video on the economics of shopping malls -> $500+ on its own He didn't become a creator. He built a press that prints episodes. The whole stack is public. Everyone has the same $20 Claude. He just pointed it at a niche and refused to stop publishing.

A 24-year-old launched a faceless YouTube channel 13 days ago. In the first month, he has already accumulated $4,000, but he has not shot a single frame.. His investment: a $20 subscription to Claude. No camera, no editor, no voice of his own. THE SYSTEM WORKS LIKE THIS: - Claude writes the full script from one topic prompt - an AI voice narrates it - an AI tool generates the animation and the visuals - one template, repeated forever: "the economics of owning an airport" / "…a private jet" / "…a hospital" - it publishes on a schedule while he sleeps The first 12 days, from zero: > "Why a Fan Can Kill You" -> 272,000 views > second video -> 136,000 views in 6 days > subscribers -> 4,300 > month-one pace -> ~$4,000 And it's replicable. One of his students launched "Mr. Finance" on the same template 13 days ago: > 10,800 subscribers > finance-niche RPM -> ~$7 per 1,000 views > one video on the economics of shopping malls -> $500+ on its own He didn't become a creator. He built a press that prints episodes. The whole stack is public. Everyone has the same $20 Claude. He just pointed it at a niche and refused to stop publishing.

Ridark

141,847 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

Mark Zuckerberg just described the obsolescence of every institution on Earth and delivered it like a product update. Zuckerberg: “I just think in the future almost everyone is gonna have the power of a 10,000-person organization.” He did not say better tools. He did not say smarter apps. He said the full cognitive output of ten thousand human beings. Packaged into a product. Handed to one person. That is not an upgrade. That is the end of the reason human beings organize at all. Companies exist because one brain is not enough. Governments exist because coordination requires hierarchy. Universities exist because knowledge demands infrastructure. Every institution ever built was a workaround for the same limitation. No single person could do it alone. Zuckerberg is telling you that limitation is about to disappear. The 500-person startup becomes one founder and an AI stack. The law firm becomes one attorney and a system that never sleeps. The hospital becomes one doctor carrying every specialist in their pocket. That is not speculation. That is a deployment schedule. And the man writing it runs a 70,000-person company. He employs 70,000 people and just told the world one person will soon need none of them. That is not a prediction. That is a confession from the man who will be first to act on it. But the part nobody is discussing matters more. This technology does not land on everyone equally. It lands first on the people who already command 10,000-person organizations. Zuckerberg does not get the power of 10,000 people. He already has that. He gets the power of 10,000 organizations. Every revolution in history was sold as liberation. The printing press was supposed to democratize knowledge. It built media empires. The internet was supposed to democratize commerce. It built trillion-dollar platforms. The tool always arrives as liberation. It always settles as leverage. And leverage always consolidates upward. Zuckerberg is not wrong about the capability. One person will do what ten thousand once did. But the question nobody is asking is the only one that matters. If everyone wields the output of 10,000 people, what is a single person actually worth? And then Zuckerberg answered his own question without realizing it. Zuckerberg: “If the intelligence of a 10,000-person company is not greater than the intelligence of a single person, then what are we doing here?” He meant it as a case for AI. That is the most brutal thing a CEO has ever said about the people who work for him.

Mark Zuckerberg just described the obsolescence of every institution on Earth and delivered it like a product update. Zuckerberg: “I just think in the future almost everyone is gonna have the power of a 10,000-person organization.” He did not say better tools. He did not say smarter apps. He said the full cognitive output of ten thousand human beings. Packaged into a product. Handed to one person. That is not an upgrade. That is the end of the reason human beings organize at all. Companies exist because one brain is not enough. Governments exist because coordination requires hierarchy. Universities exist because knowledge demands infrastructure. Every institution ever built was a workaround for the same limitation. No single person could do it alone. Zuckerberg is telling you that limitation is about to disappear. The 500-person startup becomes one founder and an AI stack. The law firm becomes one attorney and a system that never sleeps. The hospital becomes one doctor carrying every specialist in their pocket. That is not speculation. That is a deployment schedule. And the man writing it runs a 70,000-person company. He employs 70,000 people and just told the world one person will soon need none of them. That is not a prediction. That is a confession from the man who will be first to act on it. But the part nobody is discussing matters more. This technology does not land on everyone equally. It lands first on the people who already command 10,000-person organizations. Zuckerberg does not get the power of 10,000 people. He already has that. He gets the power of 10,000 organizations. Every revolution in history was sold as liberation. The printing press was supposed to democratize knowledge. It built media empires. The internet was supposed to democratize commerce. It built trillion-dollar platforms. The tool always arrives as liberation. It always settles as leverage. And leverage always consolidates upward. Zuckerberg is not wrong about the capability. One person will do what ten thousand once did. But the question nobody is asking is the only one that matters. If everyone wields the output of 10,000 people, what is a single person actually worth? And then Zuckerberg answered his own question without realizing it. Zuckerberg: “If the intelligence of a 10,000-person company is not greater than the intelligence of a single person, then what are we doing here?” He meant it as a case for AI. That is the most brutal thing a CEO has ever said about the people who work for him.

Dustin

54,061 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A teenager made $52,516 in one month after deleting his Shopify store He doesn’t film himself, doesn’t sell a course he flashed the order feed and walked $23.50, $59.99, $95.70, and the notifications don’t stop The trick isn’t a product, it’s the system behind the product He types a prompt, and 20 minutes later a full product page is live same Shopify checkout, same integration, every order carries over, except now an AI runs the storefront Then it does the thing no human will It spins up hundreds of versions of the same store, 16 variants at once, 4,000 visitors a day feeding a 2.7M sample It watches which one converts, kills the losers, keeps the winner Conversion already up 3.2%, and he touched nothing Same investors as ChatGPT, as Stripe, as Airbnb He won’t name it Still running a static Shopify store in 2026? You’re the losing variant

A teenager made $52,516 in one month after deleting his Shopify store He doesn’t film himself, doesn’t sell a course he flashed the order feed and walked $23.50, $59.99, $95.70, and the notifications don’t stop The trick isn’t a product, it’s the system behind the product He types a prompt, and 20 minutes later a full product page is live same Shopify checkout, same integration, every order carries over, except now an AI runs the storefront Then it does the thing no human will It spins up hundreds of versions of the same store, 16 variants at once, 4,000 visitors a day feeding a 2.7M sample It watches which one converts, kills the losers, keeps the winner Conversion already up 3.2%, and he touched nothing Same investors as ChatGPT, as Stripe, as Airbnb He won’t name it Still running a static Shopify store in 2026? You’re the losing variant

Spike 1%

16,510 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

In one of his interviews, the UAP whistleblower Luis Elizondo said, “Time is not a luxury that we can afford.” In another interview, he stated that he is aware of the rumors about a catastrophic event, but that he cannot talk about it, because frankly, it is not his job to do so and no one would believe it anyway. A few months later, he revealed that he is building a doomsday bunker. I asked him on X at what elevation his bunker is located, and he answered that it is at 5,500 feet. Lue knows what is coming.

In one of his interviews, the UAP whistleblower Luis Elizondo said, “Time is not a luxury that we can afford.” In another interview, he stated that he is aware of the rumors about a catastrophic event, but that he cannot talk about it, because frankly, it is not his job to do so and no one would believe it anyway. A few months later, he revealed that he is building a doomsday bunker. I asked him on X at what elevation his bunker is located, and he answered that it is at 5,500 feet. Lue knows what is coming.

Open Minded Approach

205,404 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

IN JUST 1 MONTH, HE EARNED $44,000 THANKS TO APPS IN THE APP STORE This guy has been taught his whole life that to create your own app, you need a team of 10 people, a degree in software development, start-up capital, etc. But it's good that he didn't listen to anyone and started studying the world of AI and Cladu Code. > he created the app in 2 days > later released it in the app store > he made his first sales > his app started gaining momentum > and within a month, he made his first money online

IN JUST 1 MONTH, HE EARNED $44,000 THANKS TO APPS IN THE APP STORE This guy has been taught his whole life that to create your own app, you need a team of 10 people, a degree in software development, start-up capital, etc. But it's good that he didn't listen to anyone and started studying the world of AI and Cladu Code. > he created the app in 2 days > later released it in the app store > he made his first sales > his app started gaining momentum > and within a month, he made his first money online

Shadow Nick

33,663 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A guy put an XFRA box outside his house and now gets paid $2,500 a month for doing nothing The box is about the size of an AC unit and mounts right on the wall. Inside it connects your home to a distributed AI compute network. Companies pay to run their AI workloads through it around the clock. He just plugged it in and that was it. Now $2,500 lands in his account every single month. That is $30,000 a year from a box he never touches. It is not Nvidia. It is not a government program. It is XFRA and regular homes are quietly becoming AI infrastructure. Every house a node. Every node earning. The people who move first lock in the best rates. Save this before your neighborhood figures it out before you.

A guy put an XFRA box outside his house and now gets paid $2,500 a month for doing nothing The box is about the size of an AC unit and mounts right on the wall. Inside it connects your home to a distributed AI compute network. Companies pay to run their AI workloads through it around the clock. He just plugged it in and that was it. Now $2,500 lands in his account every single month. That is $30,000 a year from a box he never touches. It is not Nvidia. It is not a government program. It is XFRA and regular homes are quietly becoming AI infrastructure. Every house a node. Every node earning. The people who move first lock in the best rates. Save this before your neighborhood figures it out before you.

winkle.

16,774 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

One guy keeps a farm of Mac minis on his desk and says each $600 box brings him $2,000 a month while he sleeps. AND THE HARDWARE ACTUALLY WORKS. But the number is not even the interesting part. The broken part is HOW: his AI no longer sits in a chat window. It sees the screen, moves the mouse itself, types and clicks the interface like a human at a computer. That is it. While most people still run AI in a chat and ask it for text, he sat Claude down right at the computer and put it to work with its hands. He automated not a single task but the workplace itself. How it actually works: on every Mac mini Claude runs with computer use turned on and the official Claude API docs spell it out: screenshot capture, mouse control, keyboard input, desktop automation. The agent opens the browser and the apps itself and runs the boring routine on a schedule: pulls leads, fills the CRM, checks orders, runs QA on the site. One box, one quiet worker that does not sleep and does not ask for a salary. His math is simple: a Mac mini is $600 once, Claude Max is $200 a month, and a live white-collar worker on the same routine costs a business $4,000 and up. So he rents out each node to a client as an AI worker for about $2,000 and 6 Mac minis come out to around $12,000 a month with costs a bit over $1,000 on subscriptions. But the $12,000 is his projection not a revenue dashboard: the video has no client, no task log, no working automation at all. The real asset here is not the stack of hardware but the one repeatable process the agent actually closes. Because a Mac mini on its own earns nothing. The money shows up exactly where the boring browser routine used to be done by hand for a salary and now you can hand it to an agent for the price of a subscription. Computer use is still in beta, almost nobody builds a service on it and the demand for cheap GUI routine is huge. The window is open for literally the next few months. Most people will watch this, laugh at the "$600 AI worker" and close it. And the ones who actually put an agent on one boring task and grind it into a repeat will ride this wave while it is still empty. Would you sit an AI right at your own computer on the boring routine or are you still clicking through it by hand?

One guy keeps a farm of Mac minis on his desk and says each $600 box brings him $2,000 a month while he sleeps. AND THE HARDWARE ACTUALLY WORKS. But the number is not even the interesting part. The broken part is HOW: his AI no longer sits in a chat window. It sees the screen, moves the mouse itself, types and clicks the interface like a human at a computer. That is it. While most people still run AI in a chat and ask it for text, he sat Claude down right at the computer and put it to work with its hands. He automated not a single task but the workplace itself. How it actually works: on every Mac mini Claude runs with computer use turned on and the official Claude API docs spell it out: screenshot capture, mouse control, keyboard input, desktop automation. The agent opens the browser and the apps itself and runs the boring routine on a schedule: pulls leads, fills the CRM, checks orders, runs QA on the site. One box, one quiet worker that does not sleep and does not ask for a salary. His math is simple: a Mac mini is $600 once, Claude Max is $200 a month, and a live white-collar worker on the same routine costs a business $4,000 and up. So he rents out each node to a client as an AI worker for about $2,000 and 6 Mac minis come out to around $12,000 a month with costs a bit over $1,000 on subscriptions. But the $12,000 is his projection not a revenue dashboard: the video has no client, no task log, no working automation at all. The real asset here is not the stack of hardware but the one repeatable process the agent actually closes. Because a Mac mini on its own earns nothing. The money shows up exactly where the boring browser routine used to be done by hand for a salary and now you can hand it to an agent for the price of a subscription. Computer use is still in beta, almost nobody builds a service on it and the demand for cheap GUI routine is huge. The window is open for literally the next few months. Most people will watch this, laugh at the "$600 AI worker" and close it. And the ones who actually put an agent on one boring task and grind it into a repeat will ride this wave while it is still empty. Would you sit an AI right at your own computer on the boring routine or are you still clicking through it by hand?

Sorven

11,948 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat