Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

One guy built a wedding camera app in a month and it now makes him over $1,000,000 a year. No team, no investors, no marketing budget. 100,000 downloads in the first month. Zero dollars on ads. He did not bolt marketing onto the product. He made using the product... the marketing. You cannot use the app alone. The host has to pull every guest into it. One wedding is not one user. It is 200 people scanning the same code in one evening. The guest liked it at someone else's wedding. A month later he throws his own event and brings his own crowd. The loop spins for free. It does not look like an ad. To the guest it is a gift. So they install it gladly. $2 to $50 subscriptions. 5% pay. That is $100,000 a month. He did not win on budget. He sewed the growth into the product itself. Could you build the loop, or is it just luck?show more

Marlow

11,479 subscribers

513,913 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Finanzen

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

33 Kommentare

Profilbild von My Dogs are Tired

My Dogs are Tiredvor 2 Monaten

All those downloads and only 49 people rated the app? Cool story.

Profilbild von reminiscent_x

reminiscent_xvor 2 Monaten

These posts are out of hand. No shot an app making $1,000,000 a year only has 4 reviews. L post.

Profilbild von RjE

RjEvor 2 Monaten

If you want to suffer through every person at your wedding holding up their phones and taking pictures… no, thank you. Terrible idea.

Profilbild von BYC

BYCvor 2 Monaten

If you could make normal / no drama naration and cut this obnoxiois music this would be a great post.

Profilbild von Howard Shadey

Howard Shadeyvor 2 Monaten

This tweet is THE AD.

Profilbild von Mihir

Mihirvor 2 Monaten

I swear I've had this idea for almost a decade now, and I sat on it like a person who sits on a great idea for almost a decade.

Profilbild von Sajid AI

Sajid AIvor 2 Monaten

The product is the marketing.

Profilbild von Lịch Đấu VN

Lịch Đấu VNvor 2 Monaten

ok, một đám cưới kéo theo 200 người quét mã cùng lúc

Profilbild von blueflymedia | weaver of worlds 🥷

blueflymedia | weaver of worlds 🥷vor 2 Monaten

Over 4 years old and only 4 ratings? bullshit

Profilbild von Andrei Shemet

Andrei Shemetvor 2 Monaten

impressive idea

Profilbild von Pukerainbow 🤮🌈

Pukerainbow 🤮🌈vor 2 Monaten

that’s a good use of Ai if you as me man, I am sure we would see many like him in the future

Profilbild von Danimal

Danimalvor 2 Monaten

4 years old and 4 ratings nice

Profilbild von CollectMemory

CollectMemoryvor 2 Monaten

This is just like my app. Check it out 👉

Profilbild von migi

migivor 2 Monaten

cool product

Profilbild von Leo Fun Facts

Leo Fun Factsvor 2 Monaten

@grok was this post written by AI?🤨

Profilbild von BOB JOHNSON

BOB JOHNSONvor 2 Monaten

This is the dumbest shit I’ve ever seen

Profilbild von The Man The Myth The Legend 🇳🇬 🇺🇸

The Man The Myth The Legend 🇳🇬 🇺🇸vor 2 Monaten

This is actually a great idea and solves the problem of family photos album Digitally as well

Profilbild von Cryton

Crytonvor 2 Monaten

That viral loop is the real product. But replicating it is way harder than copying the feature.

Profilbild von Liquidden

Liquiddenvor 2 Monaten

that's a clever distribution hack👏

Profilbild von javi vadillo

javi vadillovor 2 Monaten

Watched the starter story of the founder yesterday, sick video

Profilbild von algorithmsguy

algorithmsguyvor 2 Monaten

We have built something similar at for the Spanish crowd To be honest, I don’t trust your number (the owner was on some video saying he was at 20k MRR), and our version is more usable because there’s no app to download

Profilbild von Planos

Planosvor 2 Monaten

My wedding will be phoneless

Profilbild von Mustu

Mustuvor 2 Monaten

product virality without paid ads is possible, copying isn't

Profilbild von Dima T.

Dima T.vor 2 Monaten

Love cases like this. When the product brings in new users by itself, marketing becomes a completely different game.

Profilbild von Emark

Emarkvor 2 Monaten

Yearly reminder that there are 2.4k bookmarks on this tweet and only 0.5% will actually ever open the bookmark. Be wise use and you will easily search, get the tweet and implement.

Profilbild von Carlos

Carlosvor 2 Monaten

Chat... i don't get it lol

Profilbild von Joshua

Joshuavor 2 Monaten

now imagine he seeded this content out over reels 👀

Profilbild von Ayush Panwar

Ayush Panwarvor 2 Monaten

Cool

Profilbild von Abhishek Kaushik

Abhishek Kaushikvor 2 Monaten

You better try this :

Profilbild von David

Davidvor 2 Monaten

That's smart marketing for sure. How do people get these marketing masterpieces honestly?

Profilbild von Harry Tandy

Harry Tandyvor 2 Monaten

viral product loops beat paid ads every time

Profilbild von A.W.E.S.O.M.-O 4000

A.W.E.S.O.M.-O 4000vor 2 Monaten

This is a masterclass in solving one specific problem exceptionally well.

Profilbild von JaunesPommes ☁️🌱

JaunesPommes ☁️🌱vor 2 Monaten

Bullshit story, aint downloading ur shitty app

Ähnliche Videos

A guy made $130,000 last month from a Shopify store he has not opened in 47 days. He asked Claude to spin up the store in one prompt. Picked one trending product from Alibaba. Uploaded it. Veo 3 generated every product video he has ever posted. ChatGPT writes every ad caption and every reply to customers. His only job is watching the orders land in Stripe. He is 24. He runs the store from the Notes app on his phone. He has never logged into the Shopify admin from a desktop. He says the password is saved in his iCloud and he has not had to type it. Most dropshippers spend their week answering DMs, editing product photos, A/B testing ad copy, and arguing with suppliers. He does none of that. The AI does the things that scale and he does the thing that does not, which is exactly nothing. His ad spend is $42,000 a month. Return on ad spend: 4.1. Refund rate: 6%. Average order value: $54. The math is boring. The reason it works is interesting. The less he touches the store, the more it prints. Every time he gets the urge to optimize something he closes the tab and goes to the gym. The store does not need his taste. The dropshippers losing to him spent ten years getting good at the parts AI now does for $20 a month. Save this before the dropshipping niche figures out AI does not need them.

A guy made $130,000 last month from a Shopify store he has not opened in 47 days. He asked Claude to spin up the store in one prompt. Picked one trending product from Alibaba. Uploaded it. Veo 3 generated every product video he has ever posted. ChatGPT writes every ad caption and every reply to customers. His only job is watching the orders land in Stripe. He is 24. He runs the store from the Notes app on his phone. He has never logged into the Shopify admin from a desktop. He says the password is saved in his iCloud and he has not had to type it. Most dropshippers spend their week answering DMs, editing product photos, A/B testing ad copy, and arguing with suppliers. He does none of that. The AI does the things that scale and he does the thing that does not, which is exactly nothing. His ad spend is $42,000 a month. Return on ad spend: 4.1. Refund rate: 6%. Average order value: $54. The math is boring. The reason it works is interesting. The less he touches the store, the more it prints. Every time he gets the urge to optimize something he closes the tab and goes to the gym. The store does not need his taste. The dropshippers losing to him spent ten years getting good at the parts AI now does for $20 a month. Save this before the dropshipping niche figures out AI does not need them.

Marlow

27,351 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A FILE THAT TURNS AN EMPTY FOLDER INTO A PRODUCT WITH A PRICE IN 60 MINUTES AND AIMS AT $100,000 A MONTH in one hour you get a product with a price on it - a startup burns a quarter and $80,000 for that same hour problem → shape → surface → price → machine → back to the problem you write only the first 12 minutes: who hurts, and what it costs them right now Opus 5 gives it a shape and then a price, three Sonnet 5 build three versions of the page Haiku 4.5 stands up the machine: delivery, the queue and the weekly numbers $100,000 a month is 1,000 customers at $100, or 10 at $10,000 same number, four completely different businesses which of those four rows you're standing on gets decided in minutes 36-48, not a year from now at minute sixty you have a product, a price and a machine - and 0 customers the hour compresses the first clock to nothing, it never touches the second one the hour makes the product, it does not make the demand save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it build you these 5 blocks ↓

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A FILE THAT TURNS AN EMPTY FOLDER INTO A PRODUCT WITH A PRICE IN 60 MINUTES AND AIMS AT $100,000 A MONTH in one hour you get a product with a price on it - a startup burns a quarter and $80,000 for that same hour problem → shape → surface → price → machine → back to the problem you write only the first 12 minutes: who hurts, and what it costs them right now Opus 5 gives it a shape and then a price, three Sonnet 5 build three versions of the page Haiku 4.5 stands up the machine: delivery, the queue and the weekly numbers $100,000 a month is 1,000 customers at $100, or 10 at $10,000 same number, four completely different businesses which of those four rows you're standing on gets decided in minutes 36-48, not a year from now at minute sixty you have a product, a price and a machine - and 0 customers the hour compresses the first clock to nothing, it never touches the second one the hour makes the product, it does not make the demand save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it build you these 5 blocks ↓

Noisy

14,460 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A FILE THAT BUILDS A 12-PERSON TEAM FOR $0 - AND THAT TEAM BUILDS A BUSINESS DOING $1.4M A YEAR a 12-person team would cost you $50,000 a month, this one costs exactly zero and shows a result in 5 days root → contracts → staff → gates → clock → back to root the root never describes the product, it describes who is going to build it the first hour writes the team, the next day that team writes the product Opus 5 sits on the architect and the critic, three Sonnet 5 build, one more tests Haiku 4.5 keeps the records, and the auditor rewrites the team rules, never the product $1.4M is either 400 customers at $292 a month, or 39 clients at $3,000 the staff is real and costs $792 a year, the revenue line above it is arithmetic the cascade builds the machine, it does not sign a single one of those numbers want a different product - you change the task, not rebuild the system demand is decided by the offer, never by the file save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it build your ROOT.md ↓

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A FILE THAT BUILDS A 12-PERSON TEAM FOR $0 - AND THAT TEAM BUILDS A BUSINESS DOING $1.4M A YEAR a 12-person team would cost you $50,000 a month, this one costs exactly zero and shows a result in 5 days root → contracts → staff → gates → clock → back to root the root never describes the product, it describes who is going to build it the first hour writes the team, the next day that team writes the product Opus 5 sits on the architect and the critic, three Sonnet 5 build, one more tests Haiku 4.5 keeps the records, and the auditor rewrites the team rules, never the product $1.4M is either 400 customers at $292 a month, or 39 clients at $3,000 the staff is real and costs $792 a year, the revenue line above it is arithmetic the cascade builds the machine, it does not sign a single one of those numbers want a different product - you change the task, not rebuild the system demand is decided by the offer, never by the file save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it build your ROOT.md ↓

Sprytix

39,041 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

While you're looking at that canvas, it's saving him $15,000 a month. At 0:22 he shows how he turned $1.50 into 1,000 leads with verified emails. He built this sitting on a terrace. One afternoon. No team. No investor money. No office. Just a laptop, Claude, and n8n stitching everything together on one blue canvas. Each node is a job that used to cost a salary. One scrapes leads. One researches the company. One finds the right person. Two write the email and the DM, personalized based on everything the others found. A startup had 10 people doing this exact work. $15,000/month just in ops salaries. He does it for $200/month. $15,000 saved every month. $180,000 a year. 7 workflows. Zero employees in the loop. You spent 60 seconds watching it. It spent 60 seconds closing deals.

While you're looking at that canvas, it's saving him $15,000 a month. At 0:22 he shows how he turned $1.50 into 1,000 leads with verified emails. He built this sitting on a terrace. One afternoon. No team. No investor money. No office. Just a laptop, Claude, and n8n stitching everything together on one blue canvas. Each node is a job that used to cost a salary. One scrapes leads. One researches the company. One finds the right person. Two write the email and the DM, personalized based on everything the others found. A startup had 10 people doing this exact work. $15,000/month just in ops salaries. He does it for $200/month. $15,000 saved every month. $180,000 a year. 7 workflows. Zero employees in the loop. You spent 60 seconds watching it. It spent 60 seconds closing deals.

Superior

20,341 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A 22-year-old automated his entire YouTube channel using Claude. $8,000 a month. He doesn't even touch the videos. No camera. No editing. No burnout. Just Claude. He opens it once and tells it what to do. Claude handles everything: > finds trending topics in his niche > writes titles and descriptions built for the algorithm > generates full video scripts > creates tags, timestamps, promotional posts One prompt. One channel. One person. $8,000 a month running on autopilot. The channel works while he sleeps. While he eats. While he lives his life. Most people still think YouTube means filming, editing, grinding for years before seeing a dollar. He just taught an AI to do it for him. And while you're reading this — his channel is already getting views. The craziest part? He's not a developer. Not a tech guy. Not some Silicon Valley genius. He's just someone who stopped overcomplicating it. The tools exist. The opportunity is wide open. The only question is why it's still not you.

A 22-year-old automated his entire YouTube channel using Claude. $8,000 a month. He doesn't even touch the videos. No camera. No editing. No burnout. Just Claude. He opens it once and tells it what to do. Claude handles everything: > finds trending topics in his niche > writes titles and descriptions built for the algorithm > generates full video scripts > creates tags, timestamps, promotional posts One prompt. One channel. One person. $8,000 a month running on autopilot. The channel works while he sleeps. While he eats. While he lives his life. Most people still think YouTube means filming, editing, grinding for years before seeing a dollar. He just taught an AI to do it for him. And while you're reading this — his channel is already getting views. The craziest part? He's not a developer. Not a tech guy. Not some Silicon Valley genius. He's just someone who stopped overcomplicating it. The tools exist. The opportunity is wide open. The only question is why it's still not you.

Shelpid.WI3M

183,317 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Mark Zuckerberg just quietly executed the marketing profession. He didn’t announce it. He described it. Zuckerberg: “The AI is actually probably going to be able to find who is going to be interested in your product better than you can.” He is not pitching a better ad tool. He is telling you that your intuition about your own customer is now inferior to his algorithm. For twenty years, the internet was built on demographics. Age. Location. Income. Founders built careers defending customer personas in boardrooms. Zuckerberg is telling you to burn them. Zuckerberg: “Don’t constrain who we’re going to reach.” When you tell the system who to target, you are not helping it. You are crippling it. Every audience filter a marketer applies is a ceiling disguised as a strategy. Human targeting is no longer a competitive advantage. It is a tax. And the takeover does not stop at the audience. It swallows the creative itself. Zuckerberg: “We’re going to be able to come up with like 4,000 different versions of your creative and just test them and figure out which one works best.” No agency on Earth can test four thousand variations in real time. The machine does not have taste. It has math. And math does not lose to intuition at scale. For a generation, distribution was the skill. When every company on Earth plugs into the same omniscient ad engine, distribution stops being a weapon. It becomes infrastructure. Like bandwidth. Like cloud compute. Nobody wins because they have better access to AWS. Soon, nobody will win because they have a better media buyer. Which leaves exactly one variable on the board. Zuckerberg: “You just focus on building the best product.” For a decade, mediocre products survived on superior distribution. Bad products with great funnels printed money. That arbitrage is dead. When distribution becomes a utility, the product has nowhere left to hide. Marketing was the mask. Zuckerberg just pulled it off. Most companies are about to find out they never had a product. They had a campaign.

Mark Zuckerberg just quietly executed the marketing profession. He didn’t announce it. He described it. Zuckerberg: “The AI is actually probably going to be able to find who is going to be interested in your product better than you can.” He is not pitching a better ad tool. He is telling you that your intuition about your own customer is now inferior to his algorithm. For twenty years, the internet was built on demographics. Age. Location. Income. Founders built careers defending customer personas in boardrooms. Zuckerberg is telling you to burn them. Zuckerberg: “Don’t constrain who we’re going to reach.” When you tell the system who to target, you are not helping it. You are crippling it. Every audience filter a marketer applies is a ceiling disguised as a strategy. Human targeting is no longer a competitive advantage. It is a tax. And the takeover does not stop at the audience. It swallows the creative itself. Zuckerberg: “We’re going to be able to come up with like 4,000 different versions of your creative and just test them and figure out which one works best.” No agency on Earth can test four thousand variations in real time. The machine does not have taste. It has math. And math does not lose to intuition at scale. For a generation, distribution was the skill. When every company on Earth plugs into the same omniscient ad engine, distribution stops being a weapon. It becomes infrastructure. Like bandwidth. Like cloud compute. Nobody wins because they have better access to AWS. Soon, nobody will win because they have a better media buyer. Which leaves exactly one variable on the board. Zuckerberg: “You just focus on building the best product.” For a decade, mediocre products survived on superior distribution. Bad products with great funnels printed money. That arbitrage is dead. When distribution becomes a utility, the product has nowhere left to hide. Marketing was the mask. Zuckerberg just pulled it off. Most companies are about to find out they never had a product. They had a campaign.

Dustin

139,573 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This guy took a brand‑new app to #1 overall in the App Store and 1,000,000 downloads in under 3 days. For the FIRST TIME, he breaks down exactly how he did it, and we’re posting the full, RAW conversation right here on X To be clear, this is his first and only podcast on this playbook... And a little more context: this wasn’t luck. Jibran has taken 4 different apps to #1 in the App Store, including one that did $1.5M in 3 days and outranked ChatGPT He did it with a handful of creators, zero paid ads, and a product philosophy that blew my mind Here’s the core of what he taught me: > Your product and your marketing are not two separate things; they're the same thing. > What goes viral on TikTok is product validation. > What you learn from a hit video should change your UI, your App Store screenshots, your icon He ran that loop obsessively.. For his 2025 Wrapped app, he spent hundreds of hours in Figma asking one question: > “How does this look on TikTok?” Then he tracked: 1. What users screenshotted 2. What they shared to Snapchat 3. What slide they dropped off on The result was a #1 overall app in the App Store. Above EVERYTHING. Now he’s building because he realized he was spending hours every day doom‑scrolling TikTok looking for hooks and formats that worked So he built an AI to do it for him: > You tell it your app. > It tells you what to post, what’s trending in your niche, and what’s wrong with your existing videos. We go deep on all of it in this conversation. If you run a consumer app, this is the most useful 49 minutes you’ll spend this week

Alex Olim

106,690 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

CHINESE GUY SPENT 24 HOURS WITH CLAUDE AND BUILT AN APP THAT NOW PAYS HIM $1,000,000 A YEAR JUST CHARGING $29 TO $99 A MONTH PER SUBSCRIPTION His name is Liu XiaoPai and his never written a line of code in his life. No office, no team, nothing. He just opened Claude, explained what he wanted and 24 hours later had a working app. Design, code, marketing all done. Pause at second 7 in the video that’s the moment you see what he actually typed into Claude and how ridiculously simple it was. Then he did the exact same thing the following week. Here’s what makes it work. Businesses hate generic tools. A dentist will never pay for ChatGPT but will throw $49/month at a video editor made specifically for dental clinics. A realtor will pay $79/month for something built around property listings. A podcaster will pay $29/month for a voice tool that actually fits their workflow. So he just keeps finding these niches, building something specific for them with Claude and collecting subscriptions every single month. One guy. No employees. No code. $1,000,000 a year. You don’t need to code. You don’t even need a big idea. You just need to find people with a problem and use Claude to fix it. Honestly most people are going to read this and do nothing with it which is exactly why this still works. Save this

CHINESE GUY SPENT 24 HOURS WITH CLAUDE AND BUILT AN APP THAT NOW PAYS HIM $1,000,000 A YEAR JUST CHARGING $29 TO $99 A MONTH PER SUBSCRIPTION His name is Liu XiaoPai and his never written a line of code in his life. No office, no team, nothing. He just opened Claude, explained what he wanted and 24 hours later had a working app. Design, code, marketing all done. Pause at second 7 in the video that’s the moment you see what he actually typed into Claude and how ridiculously simple it was. Then he did the exact same thing the following week. Here’s what makes it work. Businesses hate generic tools. A dentist will never pay for ChatGPT but will throw $49/month at a video editor made specifically for dental clinics. A realtor will pay $79/month for something built around property listings. A podcaster will pay $29/month for a voice tool that actually fits their workflow. So he just keeps finding these niches, building something specific for them with Claude and collecting subscriptions every single month. One guy. No employees. No code. $1,000,000 a year. You don’t need to code. You don’t even need a big idea. You just need to find people with a problem and use Claude to fix it. Honestly most people are going to read this and do nothing with it which is exactly why this still works. Save this

AdiiX

15,873 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

He walked into a small shop and made it visible to the entire planet. One afternoon. 170 scans. A free app on his phone. He gets $400 for the scan. $99 every month for hosting. The result: a full 3D virtual tour anyone can walk through in a browser. Every shelf. Every product. Every detail of a store that most people would never find on a map. The owner gets more online visitors in a week than she got in-store visitors in a month. That gap is the business. Month one: $3,500. Month six: $18,000. The same model works for hotels, real estate listings, event venues, car dealerships, museums. Every physical space in every city is an untapped asset. Most owners have no idea this exists. He didn't wait for the right client. He walked into a shop and made one.

He walked into a small shop and made it visible to the entire planet. One afternoon. 170 scans. A free app on his phone. He gets $400 for the scan. $99 every month for hosting. The result: a full 3D virtual tour anyone can walk through in a browser. Every shelf. Every product. Every detail of a store that most people would never find on a map. The owner gets more online visitors in a week than she got in-store visitors in a month. That gap is the business. Month one: $3,500. Month six: $18,000. The same model works for hotels, real estate listings, event venues, car dealerships, museums. Every physical space in every city is an untapped asset. Most owners have no idea this exists. He didn't wait for the right client. He walked into a shop and made one.

Superior

16,952 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Do you actually understand what's happening. He built a personal local AI voice agent that fits in your pocket. Clients pay him $2,500/month to have one. It runs locally. No cloud. No rate limits. No data going anywhere. You talk to it and it acts in real systems, automatically, without a human in the loop. He looked at that device and didn't think about using it himself. He thought about who would pay him to build one for them. $28,000/month ops team. Five agents. $200/month in tools. Client saves $22,000. He earns $2,500/month to maintain it. They never cancel. Canceling means hiring the team back. 8 clients. $20,000/month recurring. Everyone is talking about AI voice agents like they're a personal productivity tool. He turned one into a business. Different outcome.

Do you actually understand what's happening. He built a personal local AI voice agent that fits in your pocket. Clients pay him $2,500/month to have one. It runs locally. No cloud. No rate limits. No data going anywhere. You talk to it and it acts in real systems, automatically, without a human in the loop. He looked at that device and didn't think about using it himself. He thought about who would pay him to build one for them. $28,000/month ops team. Five agents. $200/month in tools. Client saves $22,000. He earns $2,500/month to maintain it. They never cancel. Canceling means hiring the team back. 8 clients. $20,000/month recurring. Everyone is talking about AI voice agents like they're a personal productivity tool. He turned one into a business. Different outcome.

Superior

72,531 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A man who went to prison for talking people out of their money filmed himself doing it live, then sold the method as a course. 7 million people have watched him work. The man is Jordan Belfort. The film about him made him famous. What almost nobody has done is watch the real one, on camera, running the actual technique on a real prospect for 22 minutes with no script and no edit. And the way he does it is the reason to watch. He barely talks about the product. The first minutes are almost entirely questions, and every answer gets used against the person later in his own words. He is not persuading. He is collecting. Then the phrase the comments turned into a meme. He ends his key sentences with four words that make agreement feel like the neutral option and refusal feel like rudeness. Once you notice it, you cannot unhear it, and you will catch it in the next call you take. One viewer broke the whole method into 9 steps in a comment. It got 12 thousand likes, which tells you people are studying this video like a manual. Here is the uncomfortable part. Every technique in it is ordinary sales advice: listen, mirror, remove friction, set expectations. That is exactly what makes it worth studying. The tools were never the crime. The intent was. Learn what is being done to you and it stops working on you. That is the only defense there is. 22 minutes. No script. It is in the video.

A man who went to prison for talking people out of their money filmed himself doing it live, then sold the method as a course. 7 million people have watched him work. The man is Jordan Belfort. The film about him made him famous. What almost nobody has done is watch the real one, on camera, running the actual technique on a real prospect for 22 minutes with no script and no edit. And the way he does it is the reason to watch. He barely talks about the product. The first minutes are almost entirely questions, and every answer gets used against the person later in his own words. He is not persuading. He is collecting. Then the phrase the comments turned into a meme. He ends his key sentences with four words that make agreement feel like the neutral option and refusal feel like rudeness. Once you notice it, you cannot unhear it, and you will catch it in the next call you take. One viewer broke the whole method into 9 steps in a comment. It got 12 thousand likes, which tells you people are studying this video like a manual. Here is the uncomfortable part. Every technique in it is ordinary sales advice: listen, mirror, remove friction, set expectations. That is exactly what makes it worth studying. The tools were never the crime. The intent was. Learn what is being done to you and it stops working on you. That is the only defense there is. 22 minutes. No script. It is in the video.

Silverhand

1,518,546 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

THIS 17-YEAR-OLD SHOWED HIS APP STORE CONNECT LIVE ON CAMERA - $1.14 MILLION IN OCTOBER ALONE - AND HE BUILDS WITH AI interviewer asked him to refresh the page so no one could say it was fake - he refreshed - $1,140,000 in one month sitting right there on screen he's 17 - builds mobile consumer apps - his current one is CalAI - you take a photo of your food and it tells you the calories one idea, one app, one AI feature that solves a problem everyone has - and it scaled to $1.1M/month now Claude Opus 4.8 runs the entire YouTube automation layer on top - clipping, scripting, publishing - $16,567/month from one channel running on autopilot while the app keeps printing TJRmindset pulled 535,276 views in 7 days with the same setup - YouTube estimates $199/month but that's not where the money is - the money is in what the audience does after they watch 17 years old, one camera refresh, one number that changes how you think about what's actually possible right now

THIS 17-YEAR-OLD SHOWED HIS APP STORE CONNECT LIVE ON CAMERA - $1.14 MILLION IN OCTOBER ALONE - AND HE BUILDS WITH AI interviewer asked him to refresh the page so no one could say it was fake - he refreshed - $1,140,000 in one month sitting right there on screen he's 17 - builds mobile consumer apps - his current one is CalAI - you take a photo of your food and it tells you the calories one idea, one app, one AI feature that solves a problem everyone has - and it scaled to $1.1M/month now Claude Opus 4.8 runs the entire YouTube automation layer on top - clipping, scripting, publishing - $16,567/month from one channel running on autopilot while the app keeps printing TJRmindset pulled 535,276 views in 7 days with the same setup - YouTube estimates $199/month but that's not where the money is - the money is in what the audience does after they watch 17 years old, one camera refresh, one number that changes how you think about what's actually possible right now

Noisy

21,788 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A guy runs 3 AI businesses from a chair and one prints $100,000 a month with zero employees. Everyone has the same AI now. Most of it spits out slop because they hand it a prompt and pray. He hands it a brain. Before his agent writes 1 word, it reads everything. A copywriting skill he built himself, a headline swipe file, his own marketing notes, and David Frey's 12-step sales letter system. Then it opens the context folder and swallows the whole company. The full knowledge base, the customer avatar, the exact questions real members ask in the private group. The tool is free and it's called Obsidian. Folders and files, nothing fancy. The skills are his, the context is his, and that's the part nobody can copy. Same model everyone else has. 1 guy builds slop, 1 guy builds $100,000 a month. The difference was never the AI. It was everything you fed it first.

Veltrx

15,691 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A 23-year-old made $5,000 last month from AI. No employees. No office. He didn't write a single line of code. While you're still "thinking about getting into AI," he picked three tiny lanes and quietly took them. Lane 1 — Micro SaaS. He found one thing people pay to do by hand. Built one AI tool that does it in a click. Not a platform. One feature. $19/month, 300 people paying, and he hasn't touched it in weeks. Lane 2 — Productized AI agents. He built an AI agent that answers a dentist's phone, books the patient, and texts the confirmation. Set up once. The clinic pays $1,200 a month to keep it alive. He has nine of them now. He's never met a single patient. Lane 3 — Prompt libraries. He packaged the prompts that actually work "30 hooks that go viral," "50 cold emails that get replies" - into one file. Made it once. Sells it forever. Same file, every day, while he sleeps. Now the part that should sting a little. He didn't invent anything. The tools are free. The skills are free. AI does the hard part now. The only thing left to own is the niche and there are millions of them sitting wide open while everyone fights to build the next big app nobody asked for. He's not smarter than you. He just stopped scrolling and picked a lane. You're still scrolling.

A 23-year-old made $5,000 last month from AI. No employees. No office. He didn't write a single line of code. While you're still "thinking about getting into AI," he picked three tiny lanes and quietly took them. Lane 1 — Micro SaaS. He found one thing people pay to do by hand. Built one AI tool that does it in a click. Not a platform. One feature. $19/month, 300 people paying, and he hasn't touched it in weeks. Lane 2 — Productized AI agents. He built an AI agent that answers a dentist's phone, books the patient, and texts the confirmation. Set up once. The clinic pays $1,200 a month to keep it alive. He has nine of them now. He's never met a single patient. Lane 3 — Prompt libraries. He packaged the prompts that actually work "30 hooks that go viral," "50 cold emails that get replies" - into one file. Made it once. Sells it forever. Same file, every day, while he sleeps. Now the part that should sting a little. He didn't invent anything. The tools are free. The skills are free. AI does the hard part now. The only thing left to own is the niche and there are millions of them sitting wide open while everyone fights to build the next big app nobody asked for. He's not smarter than you. He just stopped scrolling and picked a lane. You're still scrolling.

Rich

11,453 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Do you actually understand what's happening. He built an AI box that costs less than one month of AI subscriptions. He built his for under $200. A Raspberry Pi 5 with a touchscreen and a power bank. He almost didn't bother. It looked too simple to matter. Then he ran two commands, connected six agents, and watched it start handling work he used to pay $250/month in subscriptions for. Month two cost: $3 in electricity. Now he shows people the setup and watches their faces. It still looks like a toy. It stopped being one around the time the first invoice came in.

Do you actually understand what's happening. He built an AI box that costs less than one month of AI subscriptions. He built his for under $200. A Raspberry Pi 5 with a touchscreen and a power bank. He almost didn't bother. It looked too simple to matter. Then he ran two commands, connected six agents, and watched it start handling work he used to pay $250/month in subscriptions for. Month two cost: $3 in electricity. Now he shows people the setup and watches their faces. It still looks like a toy. It stopped being one around the time the first invoice came in.

Superior

41,136 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

elon musk grabbed the source code openai open-sourced by accident, rewrote it in rust over a weekend, and shipped it as a free coding agent that does everything $200/mo chatgpt pro does. why pay $200 to openai and $200 to claude when this runs for $8 the swarm above is one weekend of exactly that: thousands of agents pouring through four endpoints, three paid seats billing $1.80 a task while the free fork bills $0. musk co-founded openai, walked out, and when they left codex on github under a permissive license, he forked it, stamped grok on it, and gave it away what the free version does that the $200 seat charges for: the agent · openai's own engine -> it reads your repo, writes patches, runs your tests, and loops until they pass, exactly like codex -> because under the hood it is codex, just faster and free. you are paying $200 for the paid skin of a tool now sitting on github the license · apache-2.0, un-revocable -> free to use, free to fork, free to ship inside your own product with zero strings -> openai cannot pull it back. musk made sure the license is the kind that never expires the switch · one line, no new tools -> point it at any openai-compatible or claude-compatible endpoint, including an $8 kimi backend -> same terminal, same workflow, gpt-5.6 and opus 5 just quietly lose the seat the bill · $400 down to $8 -> chatgpt pro plus claude max is $400 a month. the free agent plus an $8 kimi key does the same daily work -> that is a 98% cut, built out of openai's own source code, handed to you by the guy suing them here is the part they will fight me on: openai did not lose this to a better model, they lost it to their own license and an enemy with a weekend free. the $200 was never the tool, it was the toll, and musk just put openai's own logo on the road around it drop your $400/mo ai stack to $8. the run above is openai's own agent, rewritten free, doing the job it bills $200 a month for. the full breakdown is in the article below

starmex

111,101 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

A student used AI to cheat his way through an entire Amazon interview. Then recorded himself doing it. Then posted the video online. Amazon saw it. Called Columbia University. Threatened to stop hiring from the school entirely unless they expelled him. Columbia expelled him. He posted about the expulsion on Twitter. VCs saw it. $5 million raised in 24 hours. Roy Lee did not just build an interview cheat tool. He accidentally ran the most insane product launch in Silicon Valley history. Got expelled. Went viral. Raised $5 million. All in the same week. The rules of how to build a company just changed and most people did not notice. The best marketing is not an ad campaign. It is a story so unbelievable that people cannot stop sharing it. Roy Lee did not plan any of this. He just refused to hide what he was doing. And the internet rewarded him with $5 million.

A student used AI to cheat his way through an entire Amazon interview. Then recorded himself doing it. Then posted the video online. Amazon saw it. Called Columbia University. Threatened to stop hiring from the school entirely unless they expelled him. Columbia expelled him. He posted about the expulsion on Twitter. VCs saw it. $5 million raised in 24 hours. Roy Lee did not just build an interview cheat tool. He accidentally ran the most insane product launch in Silicon Valley history. Got expelled. Went viral. Raised $5 million. All in the same week. The rules of how to build a company just changed and most people did not notice. The best marketing is not an ad campaign. It is a story so unbelievable that people cannot stop sharing it. Roy Lee did not plan any of this. He just refused to hide what he was doing. And the internet rewarded him with $5 million.

CyrilXBT

21,052 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

He started using Claude AI and made $25,000 in his first month The guy could not even hide how much it changed his life. He paid for Claude and treated it like a real business partner. Built workflows that automate client work, content and outreach all in one place. What used to take him 12 hours a day now takes 2. He started taking on triple the clients without burning out once. At $5,000 per client and five clients a month, the numbers move fast. That is $25,000 landing in his account from a tool that costs $20. Most people use Claude to write captions and call it a day. He used it to rebuild his entire income from the ground up. Follow if you want the exact workflows he uses to scale this.

He started using Claude AI and made $25,000 in his first month The guy could not even hide how much it changed his life. He paid for Claude and treated it like a real business partner. Built workflows that automate client work, content and outreach all in one place. What used to take him 12 hours a day now takes 2. He started taking on triple the clients without burning out once. At $5,000 per client and five clients a month, the numbers move fast. That is $25,000 landing in his account from a tool that costs $20. Most people use Claude to write captions and call it a day. He used it to rebuild his entire income from the ground up. Follow if you want the exact workflows he uses to scale this.

winkle.

21,373 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A 24-year-old launched a faceless YouTube channel 13 days ago. In the first month, he has already accumulated $4,000, but he has not shot a single frame.. His investment: a $20 subscription to Claude. No camera, no editor, no voice of his own. THE SYSTEM WORKS LIKE THIS: - Claude writes the full script from one topic prompt - an AI voice narrates it - an AI tool generates the animation and the visuals - one template, repeated forever: "the economics of owning an airport" / "…a private jet" / "…a hospital" - it publishes on a schedule while he sleeps The first 12 days, from zero: > "Why a Fan Can Kill You" -> 272,000 views > second video -> 136,000 views in 6 days > subscribers -> 4,300 > month-one pace -> ~$4,000 And it's replicable. One of his students launched "Mr. Finance" on the same template 13 days ago: > 10,800 subscribers > finance-niche RPM -> ~$7 per 1,000 views > one video on the economics of shopping malls -> $500+ on its own He didn't become a creator. He built a press that prints episodes. The whole stack is public. Everyone has the same $20 Claude. He just pointed it at a niche and refused to stop publishing.

A 24-year-old launched a faceless YouTube channel 13 days ago. In the first month, he has already accumulated $4,000, but he has not shot a single frame.. His investment: a $20 subscription to Claude. No camera, no editor, no voice of his own. THE SYSTEM WORKS LIKE THIS: - Claude writes the full script from one topic prompt - an AI voice narrates it - an AI tool generates the animation and the visuals - one template, repeated forever: "the economics of owning an airport" / "…a private jet" / "…a hospital" - it publishes on a schedule while he sleeps The first 12 days, from zero: > "Why a Fan Can Kill You" -> 272,000 views > second video -> 136,000 views in 6 days > subscribers -> 4,300 > month-one pace -> ~$4,000 And it's replicable. One of his students launched "Mr. Finance" on the same template 13 days ago: > 10,800 subscribers > finance-niche RPM -> ~$7 per 1,000 views > one video on the economics of shopping malls -> $500+ on its own He didn't become a creator. He built a press that prints episodes. The whole stack is public. Everyone has the same $20 Claude. He just pointed it at a niche and refused to stop publishing.

Ridark

143,880 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Mark Zuckerberg just described the obsolescence of every institution on Earth and delivered it like a product update. Zuckerberg: “I just think in the future almost everyone is gonna have the power of a 10,000-person organization.” He did not say better tools. He did not say smarter apps. He said the full cognitive output of ten thousand human beings. Packaged into a product. Handed to one person. That is not an upgrade. That is the end of the reason human beings organize at all. Companies exist because one brain is not enough. Governments exist because coordination requires hierarchy. Universities exist because knowledge demands infrastructure. Every institution ever built was a workaround for the same limitation. No single person could do it alone. Zuckerberg is telling you that limitation is about to disappear. The 500-person startup becomes one founder and an AI stack. The law firm becomes one attorney and a system that never sleeps. The hospital becomes one doctor carrying every specialist in their pocket. That is not speculation. That is a deployment schedule. And the man writing it runs a 70,000-person company. He employs 70,000 people and just told the world one person will soon need none of them. That is not a prediction. That is a confession from the man who will be first to act on it. But the part nobody is discussing matters more. This technology does not land on everyone equally. It lands first on the people who already command 10,000-person organizations. Zuckerberg does not get the power of 10,000 people. He already has that. He gets the power of 10,000 organizations. Every revolution in history was sold as liberation. The printing press was supposed to democratize knowledge. It built media empires. The internet was supposed to democratize commerce. It built trillion-dollar platforms. The tool always arrives as liberation. It always settles as leverage. And leverage always consolidates upward. Zuckerberg is not wrong about the capability. One person will do what ten thousand once did. But the question nobody is asking is the only one that matters. If everyone wields the output of 10,000 people, what is a single person actually worth? And then Zuckerberg answered his own question without realizing it. Zuckerberg: “If the intelligence of a 10,000-person company is not greater than the intelligence of a single person, then what are we doing here?” He meant it as a case for AI. That is the most brutal thing a CEO has ever said about the people who work for him.

Mark Zuckerberg just described the obsolescence of every institution on Earth and delivered it like a product update. Zuckerberg: “I just think in the future almost everyone is gonna have the power of a 10,000-person organization.” He did not say better tools. He did not say smarter apps. He said the full cognitive output of ten thousand human beings. Packaged into a product. Handed to one person. That is not an upgrade. That is the end of the reason human beings organize at all. Companies exist because one brain is not enough. Governments exist because coordination requires hierarchy. Universities exist because knowledge demands infrastructure. Every institution ever built was a workaround for the same limitation. No single person could do it alone. Zuckerberg is telling you that limitation is about to disappear. The 500-person startup becomes one founder and an AI stack. The law firm becomes one attorney and a system that never sleeps. The hospital becomes one doctor carrying every specialist in their pocket. That is not speculation. That is a deployment schedule. And the man writing it runs a 70,000-person company. He employs 70,000 people and just told the world one person will soon need none of them. That is not a prediction. That is a confession from the man who will be first to act on it. But the part nobody is discussing matters more. This technology does not land on everyone equally. It lands first on the people who already command 10,000-person organizations. Zuckerberg does not get the power of 10,000 people. He already has that. He gets the power of 10,000 organizations. Every revolution in history was sold as liberation. The printing press was supposed to democratize knowledge. It built media empires. The internet was supposed to democratize commerce. It built trillion-dollar platforms. The tool always arrives as liberation. It always settles as leverage. And leverage always consolidates upward. Zuckerberg is not wrong about the capability. One person will do what ten thousand once did. But the question nobody is asking is the only one that matters. If everyone wields the output of 10,000 people, what is a single person actually worth? And then Zuckerberg answered his own question without realizing it. Zuckerberg: “If the intelligence of a 10,000-person company is not greater than the intelligence of a single person, then what are we doing here?” He meant it as a case for AI. That is the most brutal thing a CEO has ever said about the people who work for him.

Dustin

54,061 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten